Friday, April 24, 2026
Home Blog Page 1378

Homer group gets court date for challenge of council member’s residency

31

Did the Homer City Council do right by the citizens of the Cosmic Hamlet when it seated Storm Hansen-Cavasos as a voting city council member?

A judge will weigh the matter. Dec. 3 is the first court appearance for a group of Alaskans who believe that Hansen-Cavasos didn’t meet the requirements to be a candidate, much less a council member, because she lived in the Kenai Peninsula Borough, not in the city.

Cavasos filed for office on Aug. 9 for the October local election, but it wasn’t until after she was elected that some people in the area began questioning whether she met the residency requirements when she filed for office. People knew she lived on Rolling Meadows Road, about six miles out East End Road beyond the city limits.

One of those people questioning the candidate was the incumbent who lost to Hansen-Cavasos — Tom Stroozas, who took fourth in an election for two seats on the council.

Some say it’s sour grapes. But Stroozas has said he knows he’s out of the running, yet he still believes rules are rules — and that there’s ample proof Cavasos didn’t live in the city limits for the year leading up to the election. Stroozas believes the person who received the second most votes should be seated instead. That person was Shelly Erickson.

The Stroozas group has raised over $12,000 and hired an Anchorage law firm, which last week requested an expedited hearing with an Anchorage Superior Court judge, and an emergency injunction to prevent Hansen-Cavasos from serving until the matter is resolved.

The Homer City Code is clear that candidates must live in the city for the year prior to the election date. When Cavasos filed for office on Aug. 9, she listed an in-town address. But she had had a lease on a home outside the city limits that had gone through March of 2019, and then she extended it on a month-to-month basis, while she was evidently making a transition to a new residence in town. Because she is a life-long residence of the area, she is known as a local, but in fact, may have been living at her Rolling Meadows Road location, six miles outside of the city limits in 2018 and through much of 2019.

East End Road “feels like” Homer, but isn’t. You’re back in the borough once you cross McClay Road.

Rolling Meadows Road is another six miles past McClay Road. Critics say that distance would be the same as a candidate living in the Old Sterling region of the Sterling Highway, going the other direction. Or it would be as if someone living on Trunk Road in the Mat-Su Borough served on the Palmer City Council.

[Read: Homer City Council votes to investigate Cavasos]

The Homer City Council looked into the matter, had an investigation conducted on its behalf, gave Hansen-Cavasos a pass because she’s a well-known life-long resident of the area, and swore her in.

“This case involves constitutional rights of the highest order—the right to vote, and to have one’s vote counted. It also involves the companion right, equally important, to have representation in government by a person of one’s choice. Revolutions have been fought over such rights,” wrote the lawyers for Stroozas.

“Stroozas and other residents of the City are entitled to elect an eligible candidate of their choosing. Stroozas is therefore entitled to an order directing the Homer City Clerk to swear in the next eligible candidate with the highest percentage of the votes. The City must obey the law which it failed to do when it seated ineligible candidate, Hansen-Cavasos on the City Council,” the attorneys wrote.

The group believes the scenario could come up again and again in Alaska, thus feels their cause is precedent-setting. They’re asking for financial help to pursue the question of “what constitutes a city resident” in Anchorage Superior Court. Checks may be directed to Reeves-Amodio LLC, ‪500 L Street, Suite 300,‬ ‪Anchorage, AK 99501‬, with Attn: Stroozas Defense Fund in the check memo line. The Stroozas Defense Fund needs to raise another $11,000.

What the judge — or likely the Alaska Supreme Court — decides will be considered case law and will be referred to in future cases that could come up in Anchorage, the Mat-Su Valley, and the Fairbanks area, where municipalities and boroughs are side by side.

On Monday, the Homer City Council will meet in executive session to discuss how the city will pay for the defense of its decision to seat Hansen-Cavasos.

Homicide 27: Murder, arson

2

Trevor Babcock, age 42, is custody as a suspect in a homicide that left a person dead in a burning car early in the morning of Nov. 22.

Babcock was remanded at the Anchorage Jail booked him into the Anchorage Jail on two counts of Murder II, Arson I, and Tampering with Physical Evidence. It’s the 27th homicide recorded in Anchorage in 2019, one shy of the total homicides in the city in 2018.

The dead person was found in the light-colored SUV after firefighters put the fire near E. 22nd Avenue and More Street, near Cheney Lake Park, which is east of Boniface Parkway. The identity of the deceased has not yet been released.

Babcock has a long string of prior contacts with the Alaska Court System, dating back to when he was just 20 years old and popped for shoplifting. In 2016, he was found guilty of Harassment 1, and in 2018 and 2019 he faced eviction from different dwellings.

One of his recent addresses was in the Malaspina Trailer Park in East Anchorage.

Fake lawsuit: Attorney General says delayed PFD was already in process

13

MILITARY SPOUSE KNEW HER CHECK WAS SCHEDULED, BUT SUED ANYWAY

Denali Nicole Smith and her attorneys had already been informed that Smith’s Permanent Fund dividend was scheduled to be paid — and they knew it before they filed a lawsuit that has made national news.

The lawsuit by Smith claims was she denied a dividend because she is married to an Alaska woman military member who is stationed in Florida, and thus the couple is living out of Alaska. The lawsuit claims discrimination against same-sex couples.

Gov. Mike Dunleavy, Attorney General Kevin Clarkson and others named in the lawsuit were unaware that any permanent fund dividend had been denied based on the same-sex marital status of an applicant, until they read stories in the media on Thursday, according to a press release from the Attorney General’s Office.

Dunleavy immediately asked his staff, in consultation with the Department of Law and the Department of Revenue, to look into the incident to determine what occurred and how to fix it.

But Dunleavy’s staff discovered the issue had already been remedied and the plaintiff’s attorney had been notified of the remedy long before the lawsuit was filed.

The PFD Division is in the process of updating its manual to ensure this inadvertent mistake does not happen again, the statement said.

“I was only made aware of this yesterday,” said Gov. Dunleavy. “I immediately wanted to get to the bottom of it. The PFD should go to all eligible Alaskans regardless of their marital status. We are examining our regulations and processes to ensure those who are qualified get their PFD.”

According to the Department of Revenue, the PFD division recognizes same-sex spouses. 

Individual’s spouses who are living out of the state for allowable reasons will be paid under AS 43.23.008(13): “accompanying another eligible resident who is absent for a reason permitted…as the spouse, minor dependent, or disabled dependent of the eligible resident.”

A question had been raised this summer based on the Division’s Statutes and Regulations Booklet that still included the requirement from statute that same-sex marriages are not recognized—mirroring the Alaska Constitution’s definition of marriage that was struck down by the court as unconstitutional in 2015.

The applications that could have been denied based on this statute were supposed to be put on hold, while the PFD Division sought advice from the Department of Law to ensure it was properly complying with the law.

Smith’s application inadvertently was denied instead of being placed on hold. The Division remedied this denial in October, following legal advice that the statute was unconstitutional and should not be enforced.

Early in November, the Division communicated to the applicant and her attorney that she was eligible to be paid a PFD.

“No one disagrees that the denial letter never should have been sent,” said Attorney General Kevin G. Clarkson. “But the Division promptly remedied the action once it figured out its mistake. As an attorney, I am appalled that Ms. Shortell would file a false lawsuit knowing full well that the Division had already changed course and had in fact informed her that her client’s dividend was scheduled for payment before the lawsuit was filed. Attorneys have an ethical duty to not file false factual statements with a court.”

The PFD Division said it will work with the applicant to ensure her PFD gets paid. To the Division’s knowledge, there is no one who is similarly situated to Smith. The Division will continue to investigate to verify that this is indeed the case and take corrective action if necessary, the AG’s office said.

As for the lawsuit, the Department of Law will be filing a motion to dismiss, since the remedy requested—a 2019 PFD—was fulfilled before the lawsuit was even filed.

“Aside from the facts provided in this press release to clarify what occurred, there is no further information that will be provided prior to the motion to dismiss,” the Attorney General’s press release stated.

State says Juan Camarena committed rape, sex trafficking, assault

20

Juan Camarena, a person of interest in a triple homicide in Wasilla, has been charged with two counts of rape in Palmer, sex trafficking, and two counts of assault.

Troopers had put out a notice asking the public’s help in locating the 51-year-old Californian, after three bodies were found off of KGB and Knik Knack Mud Shack Road. They had been shot to death on Nov. 2.

Juan Camarena

[Read: Who is this Juan Camarena? Wanted in connection with triple homicide]

Camarena turned himself in and was later charged by U.S. District Attorney Bryan Schroeder with felon in possession of ammunition.

A grand jury on Nov. 20 issued an indictment for rape, sex trafficking, and assault. Troopers said the investigation related to the homicides in the Mat-Su Valley led to evidence that supported the charges that Camarena sexually assaulted a victim in the living room of a camper and later forced the victim to engage in prostitution by tying her up and forcing her to perform sexual acts while others were observing, in exchange for illegal drugs.

The charges also allege Camarena hit the victim’s head with a rock and discharged a gun next to her head.

Camarena is currently being held at Cook Inlet Pre-trial.

[Read: Camarena turns himself in]

[Read: Camarena charged with felon in posession]

Camarena is from Colton, Calif., where he was associated with gang activity, drug trafficking, and other criminal enterprises.

They’re legally married in Florida and she wants her Permanent Fund dividend

21

IT’S COMPLICATED BY ALASKA STATUTE

UPDATE: IT’S A FAKE LAWSUIT

A lawsuit is claiming the State of Alaska is denying a woman an Alaska Permanent Fund Dividend because she is in a same-sex marriage to a member of the military and is out of state.

Denali Nicole Smith, whose Alaska voter address is in District 20 in downtown Anchorage, says she was told by someone at the Permanent Fund Division that she would have qualified for her oil wealth dividend if she had been married to a man, rather than a woman.

Smith is said to be in a marriage with Miranda Murphy, a member of the military who is stationed in Jacksonville, Fla. The two evidently married in Florida this year, although MRAK is not able to verify when.

Alaska’s constitution defines marriage as a sanctioned relationship between one man and one woman. That provision was struck down as unconstitutional in 2015 by the U.S. Supreme Court, which effectively legalized same-sex marriage in all 50 states.

Spouses who are with their military husbands or wives while stationed out of state are entitled to their dividends. Smith wants to be treated the same as a heterosexual spouse, and is asking that the state not only pay her the dividend from this year, but also pay the dividends of any other same-sex Alaskans in the same situation, essentially treating those marriages the same as heterosexual marriages.

But it’s unclear if the two were actually married during the relevant timeframe in 2018. In a First Coast News segment in Jacksonville in June of 2019, her spouse Miranda Murphy tells the reporter that she’s at the firing range because she’s the only woman in her house.

[View that news segment at this link]

The two are, in fact, listed as co-owners of a house in Jacksonville, Fla. as of March, 2019, when they purchased it from a management holdings company.

“The State of Alaska denied Plaintiff’s eligibility for the 2019 Permanent Fund Dividend because she is a woman married to a woman who is a member of the Armed Forces of the United States who would, if married to a male member of the Armed Forces of the United States, be categorically eligible for the 2019 PFD,” according to the lawsuit.

“PFD Division representatives also verbally explained to Denali that if she were married to a man, she would not be denied her PFD,” her lawsuit states.

The story was reported first by Steve Quinn at KTVA.

What’s this? Don Young heads into White House?

6

That’s the unmistakable square-shouldered profile of Alaska Congressman Don Young heading through security to enter the White House grounds this afternoon, as caught by a loyal MRAK reader.

But what was the Dean of the House doing visiting the White House? Did he have a meeting with President Donald Trump? We’re digging to find out.

Legal opinion: Education initiative is ‘aspirational,’ has no measurable standards

7

‘WELL INTENTIONED, POORLY EXECUTED’

A legal opinion provided to the Anchorage Superintendent of Schools last month points out a number of flaws in the current self-identified “Education Bill of Rights,” which is in the signature-gathering stage. Proponents hope to get the ballot initiative onto either the Primary or General Election ballot this year.

An opinion from the law offices of Holland & Knight point to a number of problems with the initiative — everything from funding, to actual measurable standards to legal disputes between school boards and the State of Alaska.

[Read: Sweeping education initiative approved for signatures]

Some of the main points of the Holland & Knight legal opinion include:

  • “The Initiative seems not to appreciate or understand the current relationship between DEED and local school districts, and in several places, it potentially usurps the control and authority of local school boards.”
  • “Without any funding mechanism, the Initiative establishes aspirational goals but is imprecise as to how those goals will be achieved, which entities will be responsible for those goals, and how programs designed to meet these objectives will be funded.”
  • “The Initiative contains a number of aspirational statements … the challenge is how to convert these aspirational statements into actual policy, practices, and expenditures, and in determining which entities are responsible for these tasks.”
  • “The Initiative proponents describe their proposal as establishing ‘an education standard’ … but a ‘standard’ is typically something that can be measured or defined. It might be more accurate to describe the Initiative as proposing ‘goals’ or ‘aspirations.’”
  • “It seems likely that the Initiative, if enacted, could diminish the role of school boards, could create room for conflict between school boards and DEED, and could lead to other unanticipated legal disputes.”

Although the opinion was released to the school district in October, it had not been made public until obtained by and posted this week at the Alaska Policy Forum.

The costs of the initiative are unknown, as described in an opinion from the Office of Management and Budget, which said, “Without additional detail, an accurate cost estimate cannot be developed at this time. Further, the impact of the additional detail required is an unknown variable. The department recommends the Alaska Legislature as the appropriate body to undertake the public process of defining the additional detail and direction required to prepare an accurate cost estimate for this comprehensive ballot initiative.”

The opinion of OMB on the cost of the measure can be found at this link.

Who in America will be counted first in 2020 Census?

2

IT’S ‘LIZZY’ FROM TOKSOOK

The Wall Street Journal today reports the first person to be counted in the U.S. Census will be Lizzy Chimiugak of Toksook, when the 2020 Census starts in January in the village.

The elders wanted the village’s oldest person to be counted first, but no one knows if the oldest is Alois Lincoln or Lizzy Chimiugak, who both might be 89 years old, although they aren’t sure. Back when they were born, precision on their birthdate wasn’t a priority.

“They guessed back then,” resident Charles Moses told the reporter from the Journal.

The first person to be counted will be Lizzy Chimiugak, the newspaper reveals.

Chimiugak was born in a nearby village and moved to Toksook in the mid-1960s. She is considered an elder who passes down both cultural history and the Yugtun language,.

The story, behind the newspaper’s paywall, advances the process for how the count will take place in Alaska’s remote villages — a very old-fashioned process that is done by hand.

And the person who will conduct that first count in Toksook is Steve Dillingham, the director of the Census Bureau, who will travel to Nelson Island in the Bering Sea, where “residents still catch herring, hunt musk-ox and pick berries to eat,” wrote Janet Adamy for the Wall Street Journal.

Ms. Chimiugak was featured in August in the Delta Discovery, an online publication.

[Read: The art of the wooden passin.]

Pushback: Dunleavy speaks against campaign to keep Tongass locked down

GOVERNOR REMINDS DEMOCRATS ABOUT STATE SOVEREIGNTY

Anti-timber forces are so bent on keeping Southeast Alaska’s economy locked down, they are shaking their fist over a $200,000 grant from the Department of Natural Resources to the Alaska Forest Association to study what areas might be of economic value for timber, tourism, camping, and hunting in the 9.5-million acre Tongass National Forest.

The Southeast Alaska Conservation Council wants the Tongass preserved as a carbon bank for the rest of the world, an offset for climate change, if you will. The group has been calling on lawmakers from Michigan and Arizona to help stop any roads from being ever built in the forest.

Under the Trump Administration, the U.S. Forest Service proposed a new rule that would open some areas up for human use. After all, the national forest is considered a multi-use forest, but people can’t use it if they can’t access it.

Gov. Mike Dunleavy is all for the change conceptually, and he wants the State to provide the best input possible into the six alternatives for the new federal rule. The public comment period ends Dec. 17.

SEACC, a radical environmental group based in Juneau, doesn’t want the Dunleavy Administration to provide that informed comment. It’s objecting to the use of funds to study the six alternatives. It filed a public records request about the small grant the State gave, and passed its information onto willing allies in Congress.

At the behest of SEACC, Rep. Raul Grijalva, an Arizona Democrat who chairs the House Resources Committee, and Sen. Debbie Stabenow of Michigan are asking for an investigation into that grant.

But Gov. Dunleavy is having none of it. He issued a blistering statement this week taking aim at uncalled for meddling by SEACC and the Outside Democrats from states where forests are managed for multiple uses.

Here’s how Dunleavy explained the grant: After the Alaska Division of Forestry received $2 million from the Forest Service in 2018, it approved a subgrant of up to $250,000 to the Alaska Forest Association to conduct an economic analysis of the six alternatives in the environmental impact statement.

The analysis “is both important and necessary to determine where harvesting may take place while using the best available industry practices,” the governor wrote.

“Lifting the Roadless Rule also creates new recreational opportunities in the Tongass like kayaking and hiking for Alaskans and visitors from around the world and can increase connectivity between communities in the Southeast region.” – Gov. Mike Dunleavy

“This is another example of extreme environmentalists deliberately cherry picking information to distort and mislead the American public and members of Congress. The grant was appropriate and legal, all the information anyone needs to reach the same conclusion is readily available to the public.” – Gov. Mike Dunleavy

“I respectfully suggest Congressman Grijalva and Senator Stabenow do their homework before asking a federal agency to conduct a costly, time consuming and ultimately pointless investigation into a grant that will provide essential information about lifting the Roadless Rule. Exempting the Tongass from the Roadless Rule will create new jobs and economic activity in a region hard hit by the misguided policies of a previous administration,” Dunleavy said in his statement.

“As Alaskans we continually need to remind the Washington D.C. establishment that Alaska is a sovereign state. As Governor, I will continue to use our resources and assets to the benefit of all Alaskans.” – Gov. Mike Dunleavy

SEACC wasn’t the only group that raised its fist over Alaska’s study of the alternatives in the EIS.

Working hand-in-glove with the environmental operatives, Alaska Public Media’s Energy Desk asked for the same records in September, and published a news story to show that DNR had made a grant to the Alaska Forest Association, while pointing out it had not made a grant to tribal governments.

[Read the Energy Desk story: Why was fire prevention funding used on the Roadless Rule process in Alaska? Congress members want to know.]

The Tongass National Forest is the largest national forest in the United States, with 16.8 million acres.

Established in 1907, only 400,000 acres have been harvested to date, or 4 percent of the 9.4 million acres that is forested.