Wednesday, February 18, 2026
Home Blog Page 118

Just in: Anchorage listed on Department of Homeland Security’s ‘sanctuary city’ list

The US Department of Homeland Security has released its first official list of sanctuary jurisdictions under “Executive Order 14287: Protecting American Communities from Criminal Aliens,” and among the names is Anchorage.

The designation comes as part of a sweeping directive from President Donald Trump requiring DHS to identify local and state governments that, in the department’s view, obstruct the enforcement of federal immigration laws. The list, published publicly for the first time on Wednesday, includes dozens of cities, counties, and states accused of limiting cooperation with U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) or providing legal protections to individuals in the country illegally.

Anchorage has positioned itself as a “welcoming city,” a term of art used by former Mayor Ethan Berkowitz in 2017 to emphasize that city services, including police protection, are available to all residents regardless of immigration status.

This stance, while not explicitly declaring sanctuary status, mirrors sanctuary city policies by ensuring illegal immigrants feel safe and protected by the city from immigration officials.

In addition, the Anchorage School District has recently made a policy to prevent immigration enforcement officers from entering any school district property without a fully vetted warrant.

In a sharply worded statement, DHS said sanctuary jurisdictions “deliberately and shamefully obstruct the enforcement of federal immigration laws,” and accused them of “endangering American communities” by refusing to cooperate with federal authorities. According to the department, Anchorage’s policies restrict communication with federal immigration officers and limit local law enforcement’s ability to comply with ICE detainer requests. This may be in reference to the school district.

“Sanctuary cities protect dangerous criminal aliens from facing consequences and put law enforcement in peril,” the DHS release stated. Each jurisdiction on the list, including Anchorage, will receive a formal notice of non-compliance and a demand to revise policies to conform with federal law.

The Municipality of Anchorage has in recent years adopted measures intended to limit local involvement in immigration enforcement, citing concerns about civil rights and community trust.

In particular, city guidelines have restricted police from inquiring about a person’s immigration status or holding individuals solely on federal detainer requests without a judicial warrant.

The list published by DHS is subject to regular updates and may change as jurisdictions modify their policies. According to the department, the inclusion of Anchorage means the city could face administrative consequences, including potential restrictions on certain federal funds if compliance is not restored.

Local officials had not yet issued a response to the designation as of Wednesday evening. The DHS directive makes clear that jurisdictions wishing to be removed from the list must demonstrate full cooperation with immigration enforcement going forward.

Anchorage’s inclusion places it squarely in the national spotlight and in the same category as California, which identifies as a sanctuary state for illegals. Importantly, even Juneau, as liberal as it is, was not included on the list.

Read the list at this link.

Murkowski speaks at luncheon in Fairbanks, while outside, Trump supporters show the flag

While it was a Chamber of Commerce and University crowd inside the event center in Fairbanks to hear from Sen. Lisa Murkowski on Wednesday, outside there was another event going on — about 30 people had arrived with Trump flags to send a message to Murkowski that Donald Trump won the presidency again, and still has their support. We have photos:

Room with a view: A multi-media tour of scenic Mayor Suzanne LaFrance Autonomous Zone (SLAZ)

When tourists arrive in Anchorage and check into one of the downtown hotels, they’re often greeted with two starkly contrasting views. On a clear day, they might catch a glimpse of majestic Mt. McKinley on the horizon. But every day this summer, without fail, what greets them closer to ground level is another sprawling homeless encampment, just steps from where the Saturday Market sets up and directly beneath the Ramada by Wyndham.

As part of our continuing series on Anchorage’s worsening vagrancy crisis, we invite you on a photo and video tour of what has become the city’s unofficial welcome mat. This is the reality visitors encounter in downtown Anchorage — a visual story of what life looks like under Democrat leadership in Alaska’s largest city.

Below the video and images, you can find links to our tours of other vagrant encampments around Anchorage in recent weeks, as Mayor LaFrance continues to oversee the decay of the largest city in Alaska.

Palmer’s Arthur Keyes appointed Farm Services Agency director

Arthur Keyes has been appointed by the US Department of Agriculture to serve as Alaska’s executive director of the Farm Service Agency.

Keyes, owner of Glacier Valley Farm in Palmer, has years of Alaska agricultural experience, including serving as the director of the Alaska Division of Agriculture from 2016 to 2019.

Keyes was a produce manager for the Carrs supermarket chain until 2002, when he began working as a full-time farmer.

The Farm Service Agency serves a number of programs, including loans, price support, and commodity programs to stabilize farm income and promote agricultural productivity. The work includes direct and guaranteed loans for farm ownership, operations and emergency loans and disaster relief programs to help farmers recover from natural disasters or economic losses.

Politicized? Permanent Fund dividend amounts now track higher during election years

The amount of this year’s Permanent Fund dividend has been set by the Alaska Legislature at $1,000. The governor is not allowed to add back the funds taken by legislators and used for state services, so even if he vetoes part of the budget, he cannot restore the dividend to its statutory amount, which was the $3,900 he put in his proposed budget last fall.

Since Gov. Bill Walker vetoed half of Alaskans’ dividends in 2016, the Legislature has set subsequent dividends by negotiations, not a fixed formula as directed by statute, making them subject to the political whims of election years.

During election years for the past five years, the dividend has tracked higher. In 2024, there was a moderate increase with the “energy relief” portion of the dividend, which occurred during the election year.

2022’s high PFD aligns with the election and high oil prices, suggesting political motivation to boost dividends. 2024’s moderate increase also occurred during an election year.

If the trend continues, Alaskans might expect that the Permanent Fund dividend in 2026 will trend higher, as it will be another election year.

The PFD payments are typically disbursed in early October for online applicants with direct deposit, just three weeks before the general election, which makes it especially tempting for legislators to be more generous to constituents, as in vote buying.

Trump promised lower prices. Gas prices are now down across Alaska’s major communities

As of May 29, gas prices in Alaska’s major cities have seen a notable decrease compared to the same period last year, aligning with national trends of declining fuel costs.

In Anchorage, the average price for a gallon of regular gasoline is currently $3.58, down from $4.25 a year ago, a decrease of 67 cents, according to GasBuddy, a blog that tracks fuel prices. 

That is a nearly 20% drop in prices since last year, when Biden was president. We found gas at Circle K on Old Seward Highway as low as $3.46.

The reduction reflects a broader national trend, with the US average price of gasoline at $3.13 per gallon, which is 43 cents lower than a year ago.

Current GadBuddy prices here.

The highest gas price ever recorded in Anchorage history was during the Biden Administration on June 20, 2022, at $5.56, with diesel selling at $6.07.

Fairbanks residents are currently paying an average of $3.69 per gallon for regular gasoline, compared to $4.21 at this time last year, a 52-cent decrease, according to AAA.

Juneau drivers are paying an average of $3.62. It’s higher in Ketchikan, at $4.76, according to AAA.

Statewide, the average is $3.66, compared with $4.26 one year ago. Check the AAA chart at this link for your area.

“While the national average didn’t fall quite as far as anticipated for Memorial Day, it was still one of the most affordable since 2021 — and, when adjusted for inflation, among the cheapest in nearly a decade,” said Patrick De Haan, head of petroleum analysis at GasBuddy in a blog post. “As we move into the heart of summer, I believe we’re likely to see a relatively stable stretch for gas prices as refinery maintenance wraps up. Don’t expect the national average to rise above $3.30 per gallon, nor drop much below $3 for now. While refining issues on the West Coast are beginning to ease, several factors could still influence prices in the weeks ahead — including growing uncertainty around the upcoming hurricane season. We’ll also be watching OPEC+’s meeting this week to see if they boost oil production again for July as well.”

The US Energy Information Administration reported that the national average price for regular gasoline was $3.16 per gallon as of May 26, down 41.7 cents from the same time in 2024.

According to the EIA’s short-term energy outlook released in May, the average US regular gasoline retail price is projected to be $3.09 per gallon in 2025, down from $3.31 in 2024.

“The national nightmare that was Biden’s war on American energy is over,” the White House wrote last week.After President Donald J. Trump declared a National Energy Emergency on his first day in office, his administration has taken relentless action to revive the nation’s energy capabilities and undo the Biden-era stranglehold on American energy production.”

In October of 2022, Democratic state Sen. Bill Wielechowski and Sen. Scott Kawasaki sent a huffy demand letter to Alaska Attorney General Treg Taylor, reiterating their unfounded claim that Alaska gasoline prices were high due to collusion and price gouging.

Elon Musk retires from federal service

Elon Musk, the head of the Department of Government Efficiency, says his time has come to an end in service to the federal government, where he was in charge of cutting waste, fraud, and abuse, and where he battled the political machine that was bent on out-of-control spending.

“As my scheduled time as a Special Government Employee comes to an end, I would like to thank President @realDonaldTrump for the opportunity to reduce wasteful spending. The @DOGE mission will only strengthen over time as it becomes a way of life throughout the government,” Musk wrote on X.

The change was planned for weeks due to his status as a special, unpaid government employee, which limits employment to 130 days.

He announced his departure on May 28 and said he will focus more on his companies, particularly SpaceX and Tesla, though the White House and Musk have indicated that DOGE’s cost-cutting efforts will continue without his daily involvement.

Musk may still influence policy indirectly, despite scaling back his political involvement.

Sitka voters sink cruise ship limits in landslide vote

Voters in Sitka have overwhelmingly rejected a citizen-led ballot proposition special election aimed at regulating large cruise ship traffic, dealing a blow to those advocating for tighter limits on visitor numbers and port calls during the summer tourist season.

In a special election held Wednesday, preliminary results show that roughly 2,000 voted against the initiative, and 800 voted for it — 72% to 28%.

After polls closed at 8 pm, only about 100 absentee votes were outstanding, insufficient to change the outcome. The remaining ballots are to be counted June 2.

The measure would have implemented sweeping restrictions on large cruise ships, defined as vessels carrying 250 or more overnight passengers. If passed, the ordinance would have gone into effect for the 2026 cruise season and established the following limits:

  • Confined cruise ship port calls to the period between May 1 and September 30;
  • Limited port calls to six days per week, requiring one cruise-free day;
  • Imposed an annual cap of 300,000 scheduled passengers ashore;
  • Enforced a daily cap of 4,500 scheduled passengers ashore.

In addition to passenger and scheduling restrictions, the proposition required the City and Borough of Sitka to create a permitting and scheduling system for all cruise ships, large and small, and to impose penalties—including fines, permit revocations, or yearlong suspensions—for noncompliance. It also would have mandated that cruise operators report visitation data to local authorities.

Supporters of the measure, clearly in the minority, said it was necessary to preserve Sitka’s quality of life, natural environment, and infrastructure.

Opponents, including many in the local business community, argued the restrictions were too rigid and could have significant economic consequences for a city that depends heavily on summer tourism.

Win Gruening: Juneau government spending depends on cruise visitors spending

By WIN GRUENING

The recent failure of activists in Juneau to gain sufficient signatures to put yet another anti-cruise initiative on the ballot in October is evidence that local residents recognize the economic value of the industry. 

This latest effort, to place a hard cap on cruise visitors, had legal, even constitutional issues, and undercut voluntary agreements between the city and the industry that were reached after years of citizen involvement and fruitful negotiations.

It wasn’t that long ago many believed there was no way Juneau could possibly support more cruise visitors, and that the community had finally reached an absolute limit. Since then, cruise visitation has more than doubled. Through technological improvements that limit ship emissions and voluntary mitigation strategies such at Tourism Best Management Practices, the City and Borough of Juneau has become a leader in managing visitor impacts.

Anti-cruise ship crusaders’ mantra has been that passenger numbers are unsustainable and will creep even higher. That simply isn’t possible. The five-ship limit, the rule against “hot-berthing,” and agreed-upon daily passenger limits, will prevent that. Furthermore, Juneau’s dock infrastructure and Gastineau Channel’s restricted maneuvering area cannot support the larger ships being built. 

City and industry collaboration is the best way to enhance the benefits to our community while mitigating any social and environmental impacts.

The economic benefits of cruise visitors have become so embedded in the community that many residents may be unaware of them or just take them for granted. But they are significant and the Assembly ‘s penchant for spending can’t be satisfied without those dollars.

In 2023, Juneau commissioned a study by McKinley Research Group that outlines the economic impacts of cruise visitors. In that year alone, the cruise industry accounted for $375 million in direct spending in Juneau, $320 million of which is attributable to passenger spending; $39 million to cruise line spending; and $16 million to crew member spending. Expenditures were approximately evenly split between tour activities and retail/hospitality sectors.

Including direct and indirect impacts, Juneau’s cruise industry supported 3,850 jobs, $196 million in labor income, and total spending of $490 million in 2023.

But that isn’t all.

CBJ collected an estimated $22 million in cruise-related fees such as moorage and head tax revenues in 2023. The Assembly just approved a significant increase in docking fees that will raise an additional $2.5 million per year.

While some dock fees and head taxes are slated for cruise-related bond retirement and port improvements, a significant amount supports CBJ operation and administration. The CBJ FY26 draft budget includes millions of cruise dollars allocated to municipal departments such as Fire/EMS ($781,000), Parks & Rec ($862,000), Police ($1.3 million), and City Transit ($1.0 million) with lesser amounts to the Mayor’s Office, City Manager’s Office, Finance, Streets, and city harbors.

Additionally, an estimated $18 million in sales tax revenues resulted from overall cruise industry spending. Even though cruise ships visit only half the year, they now account for 25% of all sales taxes collected annually in Juneau. 

While Assembly members can spend sales tax dollars on anything they choose to fund, it is unfortunate that they have done so, in some cases, contrary to wishes of voters. Voters have taken notice and have until May 30 to sign petitions now being circulated for three initiatives designed to restrain Assembly spending.

Not included in these numbers is the sizable amount of property taxes that are collected from visitor-related businesses that cater to the ships. Restaurants, tour companies, retail stores, and more pay property tax and, in many cases, would not be open year-round, if not for the visitor industry.

Indeed, the increase in revenues from cruise ship visitors has far outpaced Juneau’s population growth. So why must the CBJ Assembly now increase debt and taxes on its residents? 

It’s past time to look at the fallacy of the Assembly’s method of basing its annual budget on last year’s expenditures as a starting point. A critical review would find that CBJ doesn’t have a revenue problem, it has a spending problem.

At the very least, it would confirm that the cruise industry has earned and proven its value to the Juneau community.

After retiring as the senior vice president in charge of business banking for Key Bank in Alaska, Win Gruening became a regular opinion page columnist for the Juneau Empire. He was born and raised in Juneau and graduated from the U.S. Air Force Academy in 1970. He is involved in various local and statewide organizations.