By WIN GRUENING

If you haven’t bookmarked this website, you should:  CovidActNow.org.

It shows that while Alaska is experiencing increasing Covid risk levels, this is mostly due to surging case levels in selected areas.

Each Alaska school district determines its current Covid risk level.  A “one-size fits all” approach makes little sense when Covid-19 statistics vary widely among different regions and communities.

Yet, while Capital City risk levels have remained relatively low, classrooms have remained off-limits to most students for 7 months.  There has been little urgency to get students back.  This, despite CDC guidelines and mounting evidence that the damage to students far outweighs potential re-opening risks from coronavirus.

Some Alaska school districts recognized this, opening with in-person classes while allowing families to opt for distance learning if desired.

Initially, the Juneau School District announced starting school with a hybrid model – a mixture of in-person and distance learning.  Just weeks before school began, those plans were scrapped in favor of all-remote learning.

Juneau’s announcement explained their decision was made in consideration of evolving guidance from state education and city health officials.  Their plan, SMART START 2020, was “designed to be a moving scale with decisions made dependent on current conditions”.   It considers “many complicating factors and will continue to evolve as [it progresses] in the coming weeks.”

This week Juneau school officials began considering a re-opening plan. But, unlike other school districts that have re-opened, JSD’s plan contains no objective criteria for determining when in-person classes will resume.  This leaves parents and students at the whim of district officials who cannot articulate when it’s “safe” to return.

The 44-school Kenai School District re-opened their schools in September.  The district’s own Covid-19 dashboard monitors each community’s numbers across their district and objectively rates its risk environment based on case counts and trends.  

Kenai’s Covid numbers are higher than Juneau’s, however, mitigation measures keep students in classrooms whenever possible.  Occasionally, temporary school closures are necessary, but parents and students at least know why.

Juneau’s teachers union objects to returning to work until it’s absolutely safe. Does that mean when a vaccine is available, and students and staff have been inoculated? That’s unlikely to happen before the end of the 2020-2021 school year, at the earliest.

Can any district afford the damaging social, emotional, and economic effects of keeping students at home indefinitely?

Just this month, after a gathering in Massachusetts, The Great Barrington Declaration, authored by three noted infectious disease epidemiologists and public health scientists, has gained some 15,000 signatures from the world’s medical and health community.  The declaration calls for a smart alternative to lockdowns and social-distancing rules that are crippling our country and preventing our schools from opening.

This last week, The World Health Organization announced that it no longer recommends economic lockdowns to fight the novel coronavirus, effectively reversing its long-held position.

In Anchorage, where Covid-19 cases are surging and in-person classes have been postponed again, School Superintendent Deena Bishop delivered a passionate plea to the school board to consider the negative impacts on students. “We are not doing a good job of educating our young people with distance delivery,” she said.

Bishop said Anchorage likely won’t be at “medium-risk” for coronavirus spread for at least a year and “we cannot wait a year to educate our children in buildings.”  She became emotional when saying, “COVID is killing our children in more ways than one. And we need to stand for children today.”

Bishop’s comments underscore the difficulties inherent in virtual education.  Remote learning, especially for earlier grades, is a lousy substitute for in-classroom instruction. Younger children require monitoring and continuity of instruction as well as help navigating required technology. Parents forced to stay at home with their children are often ill-equipped to provide it.

Parents are finding that virtual instruction is, at best, disappointing, at worst, unacceptable.  

In Juneau high schools, teaching only four days of classes per week, the district may not reach the state-mandated 900 hours of academic year instruction.  Quality of instruction can vary widely depending on the experience and comfort level a teacher has with remote delivery.  Actual instruction may last only 20-30 minutes, after which students are on their own to continue studying.  Teachers sometimes read directly from textbooks, surmising many students won’t complete reading assignments.  Some students have yet to meet their teachers and some “hands-on” classes, like shop, may be just another “study period” with no instruction.

Lacking needed structure and teacher engagement, more students are failing classes.  Thus some families have opted for home schooling, private tutoring, or established correspondence courses. 

Bars, banks, restaurants, hairdressers, and grocery, liquor and marijuana stores are open, all apparently essential.  Even Juneau’s high school football team has been practicing.

Aren’t schools at least as essential as these activities?  

The success of the mitigation strategies of the communities that believe schools are essential demonstrates that students and teachers can be kept safe.  

The sooner we open our schools, the better.

Win Gruening retired as the senior vice president in charge of business banking for Key Bank in 2012. He was born and raised in Juneau and graduated from the U.S. Air Force Academy in 1970. He is active in community affairs as a 30-plus year member of Juneau Downtown Rotary Club and has been involved in various local and statewide organizations.

By DAN FAGAN

After months of virtual silence over major controversial issues facing Alaska, Gov. Michael Dunleavy finally came out from his basement. Dunleavy had put away and stored for safe keeping his bully pulpit, coincidently, at about the same time the recall effort targeting him surfaced.   

Yet the pressure on the absent governor must have grown so intense he decided to come out of hiding. 

What might have been the final straw is when Elizabeth Welsh, the founder of the widely popular and formidable Facebook group, Open Alaska, posted this on Wednesday: 

“Where is Dunleavy? Wake up! Anchorage is in turmoil and he is silent? Write him and call him today. Tell him to end emergency powers. And travel restrictions. Speak to Anchorage. Stand up for them. Keep the assembly accountable for the CARES act money. This hands-off approach is not standing tall for half of Alaska. The travel restrictions are crippling 1/3 of our industry. Villages in long term care facilities are prisons. He likes to say we’re open, but we are not open. “

Open Alaska’s 7,000 plus members are the heart and soul of Dunleavy’s base. They frequently post their frustration over Dunleavy’s sheepishness and reluctance to take on Anchorage Mayor Ethan Berkowitz and his hard Left, rubber-stamp majority enablers on the Assembly. Welsh’s grass roots post must have scared the fear out of Dunleavy and pushed him to act. 

Dunleavy was wise to heed the call of a homeschool mom with no experience in politics who has galvanized, energized, and motivated 7,000 plus people around an issue. 

Back in August, Anchorage Assembly member Jamie Allard, who is always courageous and Trump-like, also called out Dunleavy for remaining silent on the tyranny run rampant in Alaska’s most populated city. 

“Some folks believe you can lead from the rear which we know is not true. I prefer to lead from the front,” Allard said in August. “I can’t speak for the governor, I can only say what I would do and yeah, I wish he would have taken action a lot sooner.”   

Conservative firebrand Bernadette Wilson has been very outspoken on the governor’s silence. She, too, would like to see Dunleavy do more.

“Thousands of Alaskans have been left to battle their government on their own. They’ve sent hundreds of emails and spent thousands of hours attempting to educate themselves regarding the truth about COVID,” said Wilson. “They’ve testified on numerous occasions and have been left out in the cold for countless hours outside Assembly chambers with no one but themselves because Gov. Dunleavy refuses to take a hard line with the municipality of Anchorage and stand with the citizens. I would argue there are things the governor could do to help. At the bare minimum he needs to speak up and be just as vocal as the rest of us have and from the position of someone that has far more influence and reach. We have been standing tall. It’s time for the governor to stand with us.”   

I, too, have been hounding the governor over his silence on Berkowitz’s tyranny and Dunleavy’s refusal to take a stand on Ballot Measure 1 & 2.

Dunleavy advisor Dave Stieren and I got in a rather heated exchange on the radio recently over the governor’s reluctance to take on controversial issues. Stieren claimed it was his job, not the governor’s to take on controversies.  

Wednesday evening, I received a request from Stieren asking if the governor could appear on my show Thursday morning. Stieren added via Facebook message: “He’s breaking news on your show regarding the ballot measures. He’s coming out as a no on both. So, you win.”

You can hear my conversation with the governor regarding Ballot Measures 1 & 2 by clicking on the links below. 

Podcast: Dan Fagan Show/Dunleavy takes stand on Ballot Measure 1

Podcast: Dan Fagan Show/Dunleavy takes a stand on Ballot Measure 2

I also confronted Dunleavy on why he’s remained silent as Berkowitz has destroyed Anchorage’s private sector. 

You can hear that conversation by clicking here.

Some argue there’s nothing the governor could do about Berkowitz’s tyranny, at least not legally. Therefore, Dunleavy would be wasting his time calling the mayor out for ruining the city’s economy using COVID-19 as an excuse. 

But President Trump has been very vocal in calling out Democrat-run cities where mayors have allowed rioting and looting to go unchallenged. 

This is a new age where Leftists like Berkowitz and the majority on the Anchorage Assembly are so radical, dangerous, and destructive, it’s incumbent on all of us to call them out.

Whether it be Welsh, Allard, Wilson, or even “Big Mike.” 

Dan Fagan hosts the number one rated morning drive radio show in Alaska on Newsradio 650 KENI. He splits his time between Anchorage and New Orleans. 

By PETER ZUYUS

As an advocate for senior citizens and a senior myself, this November I will be voting no on Ballot Measure 2. I urge you to do the same.

As seniors, we have long valued our right to vote for the politicians of our choosing. In a state with the highest percentage of veterans in the nation, we all have friends who fought in the wars of the 20^th Century to protect that right. As the most active share of the electorate, we exercise that right more so than any other demographic.

On Nov. 3, we will be asked to eliminate this liberty by enacting “ranked choice voting.”

Instead of our simple and transparent “one Alaskan, one vote” system, Ballot Measure 2 will force every senior to vote for all candidates in order of preference.

Democrats will be forced to vote for Republicans and Republicans will be forced to vote for Democrats.

Independents will have it even worse, losing their ability to petition onto the general election ballot.

The paid consultants shilling for Ballot Measure 2 claim you can simply vote for one candidate and leave the rest of the ballot blank.

What they don’t tell you is that your ballot will be thrown out if the candidate you choose is eliminated when the computer algorithm calculates the winner.

In fact, research shows that 10 to 27 percent of ballots are thrown out during ranked choice elections due to this very problem. 

Even if you play along and rank each candidate, seniors are most at risk of having their ballot thrown out due to voting mix-ups. Many of us have been voting for 50 years or more. Imagine entering a voting booth and receiving a ballot with 15 candidates that you must vote for in order of preference.

That’s exactly what happened in Portland, Maine in 2011 where voters were faced with a 225-bubble ballot. A single mistake – accidently ranking two candidates as your fifth choice or missing a row – could invalidate your entire ballot.

This problem of “spoiled ballots” is well documented. Research from San Francisco, where ranked choice has been used since 2004, shows that seniors are by far the most-impacted class of citizens followed closely by minority voters.

Voting should be simpler, not more complicated. 

But the flaws with Ballot Measure 2 are deeper than thrown out ballots and complicated computer algorithms. Ballot Measure 2 would change the type of politicians who get elected. Because every candidate must work to be your second or third-favorite choice, they will be less willing to take strong positions and defend seniors.

While a politician under our current system might be a vocal advocate for protecting Social Security and Medicare, a ranked choice politician will try to make everyone happy. This does not bode well for seniors who make up a very small portion of the electorate at 13 percent.

History is full of examples of societies and countries that turned their backs on seniors in times of economic stress or political pressure. As we enter a time of historic global unrest and economic distress, electing politicians who care about seniors’ issues is critically important.

This year, New York’s governor forced senior centers to accept COVID-19 patients, resulting in 6,500 senior deaths. The Texas lieutenant governor said seniors should be willing to die to save the economy. Many people believe we should end all pandemic precautions and keep seniors locked up in their nursing home cells until a cure is found.

As Alaskan seniors, we must step up to save our democratic voting system – not just for our own sake, but for those who come behind us.

Our friends and families need to know that the billionaires from New York funding Ballot Measure 2 do not have our best interests at heart. Our children and grandchildren will be proud and thankful that we stood firm and protected democracy in Alaska and the United States.

As we prepare to pass the torch to the next generation of Alaskans and enjoy our well-deserved retirement, let’s make sure our “one Alaskan, one vote” system makes it through the transition intact. Whether you’re voting by mail or in-person on Nov. 3, I urge you to defend our democracy and vote NO on Ballot Measure 2.

Pete Zuyus of Anchor Point is a retired telecommunications executive and Chief Information Officer for the State of Alaska and an advocate for seniors citizens.