Wednesday, July 15, 2026
Home Blog Page 10

Alaska LNG Special Session: HB 381 Volumetric Tax Debate & Hidden Credit Billions – Marcus Moore Analysis

1

https://www.podbean.com/media/share/pb-qgyhq-1aea995

In this episode of Must Read Alaska’s Energy and Business Edition, host Todd sits down with Marcus Moore of Alaskan Rants for an in-depth look at the special session on the Alaska LNG project. Central to the discussion is House Bill 381, which shifts taxation of pipeline infrastructure from traditional property taxes to an alternative volumetric tax based on gas throughput. Marcus provides sharp analysis on the bill’s implications, including potential tax relief worth hundreds of millions for project backers, new flexibility for municipalities, and provisions like community impact funds and the Fairbanks spur line. He questions whether the project will deliver affordable gas and jobs for Alaskans, highlighting the role of data centers in achieving lower prices and the massive potential revenue from carbon and hydrogen tax credits. The conversation explores governance changes at AGDC, liability issues, and the disconnect between public promises and committee realities. A must-listen for informed Alaskans.

 

X: @AlaskanRants

Linktree: https://linktr.ee/alaskanrants?utm_source=linktree_profile_share&ltsid=3be81fcf-fc4e-4c07-bf79-207e49534aeb

Substack: https://alaskanrants.substack.com/

 

SPONSORS:

Must Read Alaska: https://mustreadalaska.com/subscriptions/

Promo Code: energy for 10% off all our annual plans

DRB Productions: https://centertix.com/events/beatles-vs-rolling-stones-musical-showdown

Promo Code: London for MRAK subscribers

UPDATED: Gasline Bill Passes House

Editor’s Note: This story was originally published on Friday, June 12, 2026, and used the most current available information on HB 381 at the time. However, substantial new information was uploaded to akleg.gov after the publishing of this article (and after the House vote on HB 381). The headline for this article was updated, but the article itself remains unchanged for transparency. SEE HB 381 Revenues Recalculated: Sharp Government Revenue Decrease, Lower Energy Costs for Alaskans FOR MOST UP-TO-DATE ANALYSIS OF HB 381 AS PASSED BY THE HOUSE.

Today, June 12, 2026, the House passed the Alaska LNG gasline bill, HB 381, with a vote of 34 yea, 4 nay, 1 excused.

Prior to the vote, representatives highlighted the bill’s price cap provision, Renewable Energy Grant Fund provision, and the importance of pushing the Alaska LNG project forward. Representatives also repeatedly attributed the urgency of passing gasline legislation to supposed natural gas shortage in Alaska’s Cook Inlet. However, Alaska-owned producer HEX, LLC stated in a press release, May 29, 2026: “According to U.S. Geological Survey, the Cook Inlet has 19 Trillion Cubic Feet (Tcf) of natural gas, which is about 244 years of consumption at today’s energy-use rates.1 The Cook Inlet basin has the critical energy infrastructure supplying the 100% of Railbelt natural gas demand.”

SEE HB 381 Revenues Recalculated: Sharp Government Revenue Decrease, Lower Energy Costs for Alaskans FOR MOST UP-TO-DATE ANALYSIS OF HB 381 AS PASSED BY THE HOUSE.

Despite claims perpetuated by Senators Bill Wielechoswki (D-Anchorage) and Scott Kawasaki (D-Fairbanks) that HB 381 gives producers a “90% tax break,” the actual analysis provided by the Department of Revenue’s Acting Tax Director Brandon Spanos and Chief Economist Dan Stickel reveals no more than a 22.8% State revenue decrease and up to a 13.5% revenue increase for municipalities under the version of HB 381 passed by the House.

Here is the math put simply:

State RevenuesRevenue Increase: Current Tax Structure –> HB 381Percent Change
2042-2.3 billion 22.8% decrease
2052-4.2 billion20.2% decrease
2062-4.6 billion15.5% decrease
Municipal Revenues
20420.5 billion7.9% increase
20521.6 billion13.5% increase
20622.1 billion12.1% increase

Senator Kawasaki claims HB 381 gives a “90% tax cut for AKLNG and Glenfarne,” which is not true.

Senator Wielechowski sticks closer to the facts, claiming that HB 381 gives a “90% property tax break for 30 more years;” however, Wielechowski only tells half the story and fails to inform the public of the alternative volumetric tax provided in HB 381 that offsets the property tax break. This is not a tax abatement bill that simply gives corporate producers tax breaks, but a tax restructuring that replaces property tax burdens with an AVT.

The Senate will now consider HB 381.

SEE HB 381 Revenues Recalculated: Sharp Government Revenue Decrease, Lower Energy Costs for Alaskans FOR MOST UP-TO-DATE ANALYSIS OF HB 381 AS PASSED BY THE HOUSE.

Anchorage Republican Women’s Club Hosts Gubernatorial Debate June 18th

5

Thursday, June 18th, the Anchorage Republican Women’s Club is hosting a gubernatorial debate. The debate will be at the Loussac Library, beginning promptly at 6pm.

Must Read Alaska will provide coverage of the debate.

HB 381 Analysis: Conservative Value of Local Governance Plus Progressive Push for Renewable Energy

Yesterday, June 10, 2026, the House Finance Committee moved House Bill 381 version T As Amended out of committee and on to the House floor. If the House passes the bill, it will move on to the Senate for review, possible amendment, and voting before being returned to the House. HB 381 provides a revised tax structure for the Alaska LNG project and related revenue allocations.

HB 381 enables municipalities to “partially or totally exempt from taxation or provide an alternate tax rate for all or some property related to a natural gas project for a designated period.” Municipalities may also negotiate for an equity interest in lieu of property tax. Rather than the State deciding to unilaterally forego property taxes and institute an alternative volumetric tax (AVT) such as suggested in Senate Bill 2001, the House bill allows municipalities to decide the tax structure that works best for them.

According to a presentation by the Department of Revenue (DOR), the “bill is a tax decrease, the magnitude of which depends on municipal decisions, increasing uncertainty.” Although the bill does not provide absolute certainty regarding the tax structure, it does promote local government, placing the tax structuring power firmly in the hands of municipalities.

To be eligible for a potential property tax exemption and AVT, owners of property related to the gasline must commit to the following: 1) deposit $40 million into a designated community impact fund and reimburse impacted municipalities for the impacts of pipeline construction, 2) negotiate a project labor agreement for construction of the gas pipeline, and 3) construct a Fairbanks spur line.

In addition to municipal tax decisions, the State will institute an AVT of $0.15 per 1,000 cubic feet of throughput in place of state property taxes levied on property related to the gasline project. The State would then distribute 100% of the AVT revenue to municipalities, half of which would be distributed in proportion to the miles of pipe laid in those municipalities and the other half on a per-capita basis. The State would retain the unorganized borough’s portion of the revenue, an estimated 31% of the AVT revenue for the pipeline component and zero for other project components.

HB 381 also repeals the Affordable Energy Fund and enables the Legislature to appropriate 20% of certain royalty gas revenue remaining after payment to the Alaska Permanent Fund to the Renewable Energy Grant Fund (established by AS 42.45.045(m)).

The bill potentially creates a new fund, but it would need voter approval: the Alaska Education Fund. The establishment of the Alaska Education Fund would be through a constitutional amendment and therefore requires voter approval. If Alaskans approve the fund, the Alaska Education Fund would receive all remaining state revenue associated with a North Slope natural gas project after payments to the Permanent Fund, to municipalities and communities under the AVT, and to the Renewable Energy Grant Fund.

The analysis provided by Acting Tax Director Brandon Spanos and DOR Chief Economist Dan Stickel estimates state and municipal revenues under current tax law, under HB 381 as introduced, and under the version of HB 381 that passed out of committee. HB 381 as introduced decreased both state and municipal revenues to the same degree as SB 280 as introduced. The version passed out of committee (version T) reduces state revenue, but not as much as the original draft of the bill. Conversely, version T increases rather than decreases municipal revenues.

Here is the math put simply:

State RevenuesRevenue increase with HB 381 as introduced ($)Revenue increase with HB 381 as passed out of committee ($)
2042-2.6 billion-2.3 billion
2052-4.9 billion-4.2 billion
2062-7.2 billion-4.6 billion
Municipal Revenues
2042-5 billion0.5 billion
2052-9.2 billion1.6 billion
2062-13.3 billion2.1 billion

Spanos and Stickel concluded that the bill as passed onto the House floor “would not materially decrease the cost of gas or make the project more attractive to investors,” but it provides “significant benefits for communities.”

With HB 381 version T, the House shows Alaskans a willingness to decrease the State’s own revenues rather than optimizing State revenue as seen in the Senate’s actions with SB 280 during the regular session. Furthermore, the House prioritizes municipal revenues and local government power.

However, the bill also shows the House’s prioritization of renewable energy projects above education funding. The Alaska Education Fund, which requires voter approval, would only receive whatever is left after appropriations to municipalities, the Permanent Fund, and the Renewable Energy Grant Fund. The appropriating of 20% of certain royalty revenues from the gasline project to the Renewable Energy Grant Fund would not require voter approval.

The House Finance Committee includes 5 Republicans, 4 Democrats, and 2 non-affiliated representatives, and the resulting bill passed out of committee reflects a mixture of those political persuasions.

In summary, the bill reflects the conservative priority of local governance mixed with the progressive priority of pursuing renewable energy projects. The bill does not significantly burden investors, but it also does not significantly enhance the project’s attractiveness to investors. If the bill passes, Alaskans will need to consider whether or not the State ought to maintain an Alaska Education Fund, funded by leftover revenue from the gasline project.

Alaska DOT&PF Seeks to Lease Vendor Space in Ted Stevens Concourse C

0

The following is a reprint in full of the public notice available at the State of Alaska’s Online Public Notices.

REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS (RFP): The State of Alaska, Department of Transportation and Public Facilities requests proposals for the non-exclusive rights and obligations to Concourse C Amenities Concession ADA-32658 in the South Terminal of the Ted Stevens Anchorage International Airport.

NATURE OF RIGHTS AND OBLIGATIONS: The Concourse C Amenities Concession seeks the non-exclusive right to redevelop, renovate, lease and management of a service(s), a retail venture, or a food and beverage concession, located in the Concourse C, serving airline passengers, Airport employees, and other users of the Airport. The Premises will be made available “as-is.” 

CONCESSION SPACE: Room SB2040 consisting of 988 sq. ft.. TERM: 5 YEARS (October 1, 2026 to September 30, 2031.)  

FEES: The Concessionaire shall pay the State percentages of the Concessionaire’s monthly gross revenues, based on submitted proposals and subsequent negotiations between the State and the Concessionaire; plus additional rent for the build-out period and for any support space(s). The Airport may also require a Minimum Annual Guarantee from the Concessionaire as part of the negotiated Concession Agreement. 

CAPITAL INVESTMENT: The successful proposer will be required to make a commitment to its proposed investment in the Amenities build-out and as Proposed in the RFP. 

MINIMUM QUALIFICATIONS: Within the past five (5) years, at least twenty-four (24) months of experience in high-volume service(s), retail or food and beverage establishment. Furthermore, all proposers must demonstrate that whether as an individual, an entity, or through an employed/contracted local manager, they possess the knowledge and experience to coordinate and execute any proposed design and build-out of the renovated Amenities Concession in C Concourse.

Request For Proposal (RFP) copies can be found at State of Alaska, Online Public Notice (OPN) website: RFP ADA-32658 – Room SB2040 – Concourse C Amenities Concession – ANC – Alaska Online Public Notices. All addenda and amendments will be posted online to the OPN Public Notice website.

Copies of the RFP, Sample Concession Agreement, and other pertinent documents are available between the hours of 9:00 AM and 5:00 PM (AKST), Monday through Friday, from Nathaniel Zacharzewski, by emailing [email protected] or calling (907) 474-2579. Request for copies of any documents will be subject to a fee, the posted rate of $0.25 per page. All addenda and amendments will be posted online to the OPN Public Notice.

An optional Pre-Proposal Tour will be held at 12:00 PM (AKST) on Wednesday, July 1, 2026. Interested participants will meet at the Airport Staff Offices, 3rd Floor check in desk. The Administrative offices are located in between the North and South Terminals, at 5000 West International Airport Rd, Room C3890, 3rd Floor. Access Door to elevator is located off Tower Road or off the connector hall between North and South Terminal. Parking at the North Terminal is recommended. There is also a $5,000.00 deposit required with each proposal; the Airport will fully refund the deposits of unsuccessful proposers. Comments, questions, and requests for information may be submitted in writing to: Nathaniel Zacharzewski ([email protected]), Leasing Office, Ted Stevens Anchorage International Airport, PO Box 196960, Anchorage, Alaska 99519-6960, and must be received by 4:00 PM (AKST) on or before July 8, 2026Proposals must be received by 2:00 PM (AKST) on or before July 27, 2026.

DOT&PF operates Federal Programs without regard to race, color, national origin, sex, age, or disability. Full Title VI Nondiscrimination Policy: dot.alaska.gov/tvi_statement.shtml. To file a complaint, go to: dot.alaska.gov/cvlrts/titlevi.shtml.

DOT&PF complies with Title II of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990. Individuals with disabilities who may need auxiliary aids, services, and/or special modifications to participate in public meetings or who require special accommodations while gathering information on this file, should contact Nathaniel Zacharzewski at [email protected] or TTY Alaska Relay 711. Requests should be made at least 5 days before the accommodation is needed to make any necessary arrangements.

The Department reserves the right to correct technical defects in lease language, the premises’ description, lease term, or the purposes of the lease, and to reject any or all applications when doing so is in the best interests of the Department.

Public notice provided by Ted Stevens International Airport and posted at https://aws.state.ak.us/OnlinePublicNotices/Notices/View.aspx?id=224171. In accordance with 17 AAC 42.400(a), the notice is to be published June 11, 2026, through August 10, 2026 (60 days) in the Alaska Online Public Notice System.

Fourth Icebreaker Announced for Homeporting in Alaska

0

Due to a coordinated effort by Alaska’s Congressional Delegation, the President, and the U.S. Coast Guard, four Arctic Security Cutters or icebreakers have been secured for homeporting in Alaska. The securement of the first three icebreakers for Alaska was announced April 16, this year. The addition of the fourth icebreaker was announced this morning, June 11th.

The existing icebreaker, the Storis, was commissioned in Juneau, August 10, 2025. The next two icebreakers will be homeported in Kodiak following construction and the fourth will be homeported in Seward.

Congress has secured funding for a total of 11 Arctic Security Cutters for America. The first two to be built will go to Kodiak. The icebreaker to be homeported in Seward will be the sixth or seventh icebreaker built.

“Seward is going to be the next great Coast Guard city,” stated Senator Dan Sullivan during a press conference.

Senator Lisa Murkowski commented: “The investment is long, long overdue… The U.S. was lagging woefully behind.” Murkowski emphasized the need for Alaskans to focus on homeporting preparations related to housing, schools, childcare, affordable energy, shoreside infrastructure, and roads. 

Senators Sullivan and Murkowski both highlighted the need to address the energy needs of new Coast Guard families brought by the homeporting. They also both encouraged Alaskan coastal communities to continue port projects that enable more icebreakers to be homeported in Alaska.

Sullivan stated, “The Coast Guard is really pushing for speed.” Murkowski expressed appreciation for the Coast Guard’s willingness to converse with each member of the Alaska Congressional Delegation and with community leaders regarding the homeporting decision.

U.S. Representative Nick Begich commented in a press release: “Alaska is America’s gateway to the Arctic, and for too long, our nation’s icebreakers have been stationed thousands of miles from the waters they are built to navigate. Homeporting these icebreakers in Seward and Kodiak puts them exactly where they belong, closest to the mission and ready to project American strength across the Arctic at a time when our adversaries are racing to expand their own presence.”

Through the 2025 Working Families Tax Cuts Act (WFTCA), the Alaska congressional delegation secured $4.3 billion for the procurement of two new Polar Security Cutters, with substantial progress toward a third, and $3.5 billion to procure three Arctic Security Cutters, the nation’s next-generation medium polar icebreakers. Additionally, they championed $816 million for more than ten new light and medium domestic icebreaking cutters. They also helped secure over $3 billion for shoreside infrastructure to support the homeporting of these assets, including the $300 million needed for the homeporting of the Storis in Juneau. These investments and announcements mark the most significant expansion of icebreaking capability in U.S. history.

Beyond icebreakers, the WFTCA included major investments across the Coast Guard’s fleet: $1 billion for approximately 10 Fast Response Cutters (FRC), $4.3 billion for approximately nine Offshore Patrol Cutters (OPC), $2.2 billion for approximately 40 MH-60 helicopters, and $1.1 billion for approximately six HC-130 aircraft.

“Let’s Build This Damn Line:” Laborers, Union Leaders, and AK LNG Project Leaders Gather to Sign Labor Memorandum

This morning, June 11, Glenfarne Alaska LNG and Alaska’s Building Trades signed a memorandum of understanding (MOU) regarding labor for the Alaska LNG gasline. According to Joey Merrick, President of the Alaska Petroleum Joint Crafts Council, the MOU ensures Alaskans will be prioritized for jobs created by the gasline project and that every Alaskan who wants to work on the project has an opportunity to do so.

Laborers, union leaders, and project leaders gathered at the Alaska Laborers Training School to announce the signing of the memorandum.

“Today is about opportunity. It is about Alaska workers. It is about Alaska’s future,” stated Merrick. He emphasized the 12,000 jobs that the project creates, which will be filled first by Alaskans with the remaining jobs filled by lower 48 laborers. Merrick commented: “This is what this agreement represents: partnership, accountability, and opportunity.”

Adam Prestidge, President of Glenfarne Alaska LNG, gave a brief speech, stating that Glenfarne is “thrilled by the fortitude and commitment” of Alaskan laborers and leaders. Prestidge said, “today gives a resounding yes” to the question of whether the gasline can be built.

“First and foremost, [the MOU] is about prioritizing Alaska workers,” stated Rex Canon, Co-President of 8 Star Alaska, a subsidiary of Glenfarne Alaska LNG. Canon emphasized that every Alaskan who wants to participate and is qualified will get a chance to work on the project. According to Canon, working with the labor unions will help ensure the project “gets done on time and on budget.”

President of the Fairbanks Building and Construction Trades Council, Lake Williams commented on the current lack of opportunities in the state: “We see outward migration. People are going elsewhere for opportunity. Our kids are leaving.” According to Williams, the LNG project is the answer. He calls for the Legislature to “put their differences aside and do what’s best for Alaska.”

“Let’s build this damn line,” concluded Williams. “It is now or never. Let’s get it done.”

Bronson Frye, President of the Building and Construction Trades Council of Southcentral Alaska highlighted the “once in a generation” opportunity that the project offers and the “simple principle” that the gasline should be built by Alaskans. “That principle matters,” said Frye. “When we build something worthwhile, we build it together.”

Must Read Alaska has requested a copy of the MOU and will share it with readers when it is received.

Fleeting Highs, Layered Heartaches: Sin’s Cause-and-Effect

From the opening pages of Genesis to the digital headlines of the twenty-first century, humanity’s story repeats a single unlearned lesson: separation from God is never the answer. This is not ancient myth or abstract theology. It is the lived experience of every soul. Novels, films, and nightly news echo the same tension: free creatures choosing autonomy over the Creator. The choice is never “one and done.” It is daily, hourly, moment-by-moment. Each person confronts the same three unrelenting enemies: the flesh, the world, and the devil. Beneath every glittering temptation lies a three-letter reality: sin. 

At the heart of every fall lies pride — the root of every sin — and concupiscence, the disordered inclination toward sin inherited from the Fall. St. Thomas Aquinas maps the interior mechanics with clinical precision in the Summa Theologica (I-II, qq. 77–78). Original sin wounds the soul: the intellect darkens, the will weakens, and the passions rebel. Temptation then follows an exact sequence: 1) suggestion, the external lure from the world or the devil; 2) delight, the lower appetites savoring the forbidden; and finally, 3) consent, when the person acts on ungodly desires. Each consent disorders the soul further, making the next surrender easier. This is not metaphor. It is the lived psychology of every human heart since Eden. 

The pattern opens in Paradise. Adam and Eve, offered intimate friendship with God, preferred the serpent’s whisper: “You will be like gods” (Gen 3:5). Pride turned the will from Creator to creature. Cain chose murder over repentance (Gen 4). Noah’s descendants at Babel sought to “make a name for themselves” rather than call upon the Lord (Gen 11:4). Moses descended Sinai to find Israel adoring a golden calf of their own making (Ex 32). Even David, “a man after God’s own heart,” saw Bathsheba, delighted in what the eye suggested, and consented to adultery and murder (2 Sam 11). The mechanism never changes: suggestion, delight, consent, separation. Contrary to every moral lesson history offers, humanity stubbornly insists on knowing better than God and turns from the very boundaries He set for those who desire peace and joy. 

Jesus enters history as the New Adam. In the wilderness He faced the identical triad: flesh (stones into bread), world (all kingdoms for one act of worship), devil (cast yourself down)— and He refused every suggestion (Mt 4). On the Cross He crushed sin at its root, restoring grace and the possibility of rightly ordered desire. Yet the Church He founded was not spared the trial. Early martyrs resisted imperial power, and heresies arose to twist the apostolic faith, only to be put down by faithful saints. By the sixteenth century the disorder erupted publicly. The Protestant Reformation, whatever its grievances, fractured visible unity. Private judgment replaced the Church’s authority; the darkened intellect and weakened will lost their stable guide. Suggestion found easier consent. 

The pattern accelerates. Enlightenment rationalism, industrial materialism, and the sexual revolution armed the world’s allure with technology and artificial contraception. The flesh promised pleasure without consequence; the devil reframed autonomy as liberation. Inside the Church, post-conciliar decades witnessed a subtle erosion: doctrines on the Real Presence, mortal sin, marital indissolubility, and the uniqueness of Christ were psychologized or reduced to “pastoral options.” The same interior sequence operated: suggestion that mercy means accommodation, delight in cultural approval, consent that dilutes truth to avoid conflict. 

Today the separation is measurable. Belief in Christ’s divinity, the Resurrection, and even the existence of hell has plummeted. Families fracture, nations enshrine what Scripture calls abomination, and millions of the baptized live as practical atheists. Screens stimulate the passions around the clock. The intellect calls evil good; the will chooses comfort; the passions clamor for instant gratification. 

Yet the soul knows one thing with crystalline certainty: objective Truth. When the soul aligned with God’s will encounters that Truth, it stands affirmed and experiences peace. But the soul not following God’s will, when confronted with His Truth, recoils like a serpent in the grass and strikes at the bearer. Augustine’s confession names this restlessness: “Our hearts are restless until they rest in You, Lord.” God created humanity male and female and declared it “very good” (Gen 1:27, 31). Jesus reaffirmed the divine architecture: “What therefore God has joined together, let not man separate” (Mt 19:6). St. John names the perennial triad: “the desires of the flesh, the desires of the eyes, and the pride of life” (1 Jn 2:16). Romans 1:24–27 warns that exchanging truth for a lie leads to dishonorable passions and a debased mind. 

The Church Fathers diagnosed the disorder with prophetic clarity. St. Irenaeus condemned those who serve their own lusts while puffed up with pride, rejecting the Creator’s order. St. John Climacus declared, “Pride is the cause of every passion.” Aquinas crowns the analysis: pride is the “queen of all vices,” an inordinate appetite for excellence that elevates self above God (II-II, q. 162), rooted in the same three fountains: concupiscence of the flesh, concupiscence of the eyes, and pride of life. Unchecked, they produce disorder on every level whether spiritual, psychological, relational, or societal. 

Contemporary culture rebrands these vices as identity. When confronted with God’s design for marriage and sexuality, the response is rarely sorrow leading to repentance— it is hostility: “How dare you!” Yet population studies quietly affirm the ancient wisdom. Individuals in disordered lifestyles show significantly higher rates of depression, anxiety, and substance abuse, while stable, lifelong heterosexual marriage correlates with lower psychological distress, greater life satisfaction, and resilience. These statistics do not prove theology; they illustrate its outworking. Disordered passion yields fragmentation, not flourishing. What begins as elation unravels into layered heartache. 

Jesus did not abolish the flesh, the world, or the devil. He conquered them. Through the sacraments He supplies actual grace that heals the wounds Aquinas diagnosed. The sequence that leads to sin can be reversed by vigilance, prayer, and confession. The witness of martyrs and saints proves it is possible. 

Humanity’s story, therefore, is not inevitable decline, but repeated divine invitation. From Eden to this present hour, God cries: “Return to me with all your heart” (Joel 2:12). The deposit of faith has never changed; only our willingness to live it has. The question for our generation is whether we will at last consent to the grace that alone can reorder the human heart. Until then, humanity will chase fleeting highs and layered heartaches— restless, until it rests solely in God. 

10 Republicans File Formal Complaint Against ARP District 25 Chair Steve Johnson

Ten Republicans have filed a formal complaint against Steve Johnson, Chair for the Alaska Republican Party District 25. Steve Johnson is the husband of the current Alaska House Minority Leader, Representative Delena Johnson.

The complaint lists six reasons why the signatories have filed the complaints: 1) false statement regarding knowledge of precinct leaders, 2) refusal to hear a motion to reconsider mishandled endorsements, 3) refusal to properly follow Roberts Rules of Order, 4) refusal to seat present precinct leaders who requested seating, 5) conflict of interest and obstruction of endorsement process, 6) pattern of gatekeeping and exclusionary conduct.

Signatories sent the complaint letter to ARP Chairwoman Carmela Warfield, asking for an “immediate independent investigation into the conduct” of District Chair Johnson and the “temporary suspension of chair duties pending completion of the investigation.” If the investigation substantiates the allegations, the signatories ask that Johnson be removed from his position as Chair and other remedial measures taken.

Must Read Alaska reached out to the principal signatory, Joshua Hanson, to inquire whether a response has been provided by Chair Warfield and whether that response could be shared with the public. Hanson replied that Warfield responded but requested that the information not be shared with third parties.

“At this point I think it is safe to say we are hopeful that the next steps are in motion and will be announced in the near future,” stated Hanson.

Read the full formal complaint below: