Sunday, July 6, 2025
Home Blog Page 10

Ryan McKee: Give families the power to protect children online

By RYAN MCKEE

As app stores continue to expand, advance, and integrate social features, their potential to contribute to technology dependency among minors also increases. It is far too easy for children to stumble across applications that, despite having in-app restrictions, can really be used by anyone, of any age.

The primary concern with this blatant lack of age-related limitations is the fact that many applications meant for people 18 and older are social media sites. This means that young children can be readily consuming content and messages posted by adults. The US Surgeon General found that almost 95% of Americans between the ages of 13 and 17 use a social media platform, highlighting the need for increased regulation surrounding social media use amongst teenagers.

The App Store Accountability Act, introduced by Sen. Mike Lee (R-UT) and Sen. John James (R-MI), aims to address concerns about excessive underage social media use. This legislation would require app stores to provide parents with the ability to approve or reject any application their child wishes to download. By mandating parental review of these applications, the bill offers parents more thorough insight into their children’s online activities and expands the digital safety net.

As former President of the Alaska Young Republican Federation, I cannot help but fear the implications of the exponential rise in social media use in children and teens. Senator Lee said it best, “For too long, app stores and developers have prioritized profits over the safety of our children.”

I am calling on my fellow Alaskans, policymakers and parents alike, to support the App Store Accountability Act and keep our young people safe in their digital explorations.

Apps like Instagram, TikTok, and X (formerly Twitter) have catered to younger generations since their founding, allowing users as young as 13 years-old to sign up for an account. According to a Gallup poll, American teenagers spend an average of 4.8 hours per day scrolling on social media, meaning that almost one-fourth of the typical day for a teen in the US is used to compare themselves to others and interact with online strangers.

This extensive engagement with social media has raised concerns about its impact on mental health and well-being, prompting discussions around the need for more stringent regulations to protect young users.

Unlike many pieces of legislation proposed in an attempt to regulate technology use, the App Store Accountability act is accepted amongst both policymakers and parents. A recent Morning Consult poll found that 79 percent of parents support a law requiring children 16 years-old and under to get permission from their legal guardians prior to downloading an application. With multiple different parties advocating for full parental control over their children’s actions within app stores, there is no reason that a simple, one-click, app-store-level method of approving or denying a download should not materialize.

The rapid evolution of app stores and social media platforms has heightened minors’ vulnerability to inappropriate content exposure and social media addiction. The App Store Accountability Act is an essential measure addressing these concerns by granting parents greater control over their children’s digital activities.

Age verification and parental approval mechanisms at the app-store-level is the future of child online safety. This legislation not only enhances young users’ safety but also promotes responsible technology use within families. Widespread support for this bill highlights Alaska and America’s collective understanding that stronger digital safeguards are non-negotiable.

Ryan McKee was born in El Salvador and raised in Wasilla. He earned his Bachelors in Political Science from UAA. McKee previously worked as state director for Americans for Prosperity and now works as chief of staff for Sen. Yundt (R-Wasilla) in the Alaska State Legislature.

Assemblyman Constant denies mouthing expletive at member of public, says he’s victim of ‘extraordinary gaslighting’

Anchorage Assembly Chairman Chris Constant became defensive on Tuesday during the regular Assembly meeting after a video surfaced last week that appears to show him mouthing an obscenity — “F— you” — at a woman preparing to testify during a committee meeting pertaining to the homelessness crisis in Anchorage.

The incident, captured on official video, has prompted widespread public concern, with a chorus of voices calling on Constant to take responsibility for his unbecoming behavior.

The woman, Amber Brophy King, is a member of the “Save Anchorage” group, a frequent critic of Assembly policies and members. It’s a group that Constant openly despises.

Twitter commentary from Assemblyman Chris Constant shows his disrespect for Save Anchorage.

In the footage from last week’s committee meeting, Constant is seen turning his head to look directly at her, doing a double take as he appears to recognize her, and then clearly mouthing the two-word expletive about 15 minutes before her public testimony began.

Despite what appears to be clear visual evidence, Constant forcefully denied making the remark. During Tuesday’s regular Assembly meeting, he addressed the controversy from the dais, claiming, “What happened was gaslighting of an extraordinary type.” He asserted that he was not speaking to Brophy-King at all, but rather indicating that a seat was available for another individual by saying “For you.”

Constant also told the audience that he left the room during the woman’s testimony to take a phone call regarding his ailing mother, an explanation that some members of the public have viewed skeptically.

Brophy King, who remained composed during her committee testimony about the vagrancy crisis, stands by her account. He looked at her dead in the face and said “F— You,” she said.

The video in question, first made public at Must Read Alaska, has been widely circulated on social media and speaks for itself. Roll tape:

The incident has renewed accusations that the Assembly majority, particularly Constant, is hostile toward public input — especially from citizens who dissent from their agenda. The chairman’s behavior is emblematic of a broader culture of intolerance for opposing views. In the past, Constant was caught making the “L” for “Loser” sign at a member of the public during an official meeting, something he also denied.

It is not likely that the Assembly will take any formal action, though public pressure is mounting. At least two members of the body have privately acknowledged the video raises ethical concerns.

As for Constant, he has given no indication that he plans to apologize.

The public is invited to review the video footage and decide for themselves. But for some who watched Tuesday’s meeting, the chairman’s defensiveness did little to extinguish concerns.

Video: Sen. Sullivan’s Golden Dome Act has Alaska at center of national missile defense strategy

Alaska’s strategic position as the cornerstone of America’s missile defense system was reaffirmed Tuesday as US Sen. Dan Sullivan and congressional colleagues introduced the GOLDEN DOME Act, a $23 billion legislative effort to modernize and expand the nation’s missile defense infrastructure. In short, it will enhance the ability to intercept incoming missiles from enemy nations or terrorists.

The “Ground and Orbital Launched Defeat of Emergent Nuclear Destruction and Other Missile Engagements (GOLDEN DOME) Act” was unveiled during a press conference in Washington, DC with co-sponsors Senators Kevin Cramer of North Dakota and Representative Mark Messmer of Indiana, who will carry the bill on the House side.

The legislation advances the missile defense vision laid out by President Donald Trump in his January 2025 executive order, which called for a layered, open-architecture defense shield capable of countering threats from adversaries such as Iran, Russia, and China.

Sen. Sullivan emphasized Alaska’s critical role in the new defense posture.

“The great State of Alaska has been — and will continue to be — the cornerstone of our missile defense system,” said Sullivan, pointing to Fort Greely’s interceptor fields near Delta Junction and the state’s expanding infrastructure.

“The escalating missile threats we’ve witnessed from the Iranian terrorist regime and the rapidly evolving threats from Russia and China demonstrate why we need this now,” he said.

The bill authorizes funding for a nationwide, layered missile defense shield integrating space-based sensors, new intercept technologies, and significantly expanded ground-based infrastructure.

For Alaska, this means continued investment at Fort Greely, already home to the country’s Ground-Based Midcourse Defense interceptors, and likely additional military construction to support expanded capabilities. The Golden Dome plan builds on such defenses, by creating, maintaining and/or revitalizing other sites as well, including the Cobra Dane — a land-based “passive electronically scanned array” radar system positioned in the Aleutian Chain.

The legislation also dovetails with the $25 billion already included in the reconciliation bill as a “down payment” toward this effort.

The bill is backed by a host of Senate Republicans, including John Hoeven (ND), Tim Sheehy (Mont.), Katie Britt (Ala.), Tom Cotton (Ark.), Marsha Blackburn (Tenn.), Tommy Tuberville (Ala.), Jim Banks (Ind.), and Tim Scott (SC).

The legislation also aims to accelerate US defenses against emerging threats, including hypersonic missiles and advanced cruise missile systems, and improve all-domain awareness, integrating land, air, sea, space, and cyber systems to provide faster detection and tracking.

With its northern latitude and proximity to potential threats from Asia and the Arctic, Alaska has long been central to America’s missile defense strategy. Fort Greely’s interceptor fields already play a pivotal role, and the GOLDEN DOME Act appears to lock in and potentially expand that role for decades.

The bill’s sponsors said they plan to move quickly to pass the GOLDEN DOME Act and deliver it to President Trump for signature.

“Alaska is a big part of [missile defense] because the location is sort of perfect,” President Donald Trump has said. Alaska is both the most western and the most eastern part of the nation, with the tip of the Aleutian Chain crossing the into the Eastern Hemisphere at Semisopochnoi Island.

Anchorage Assembly set to approve major city lobbying contract with former Mayor Mark Begich’s firm

The Anchorage Assembly at Tuesday’s meeting is set to approve a new lobbying contract with a firm that employs former US Senator and former Anchorage Mayor Mark Begich, raising questions about transparency in city government.

According to Assembly meeting documents, the firm Brownstein Hyatt Farber Schreck, LLP was selected from seven applicants to provide federal and state lobbying services for the Municipality of Anchorage. The initial contract runs from July 1 through Dec. 31, at a not-to-exceed cost of $90,000. Two optional one-year renewals at $200,000 each could bring the total contract value to $490,000.

Begich, who also owns hotel properties periodically leased by the city for use as homeless shelters, is named in the contract as the “Lead Lobbyist.” Though he is not a registered lobbyist, his involvement in municipal matters is ongoing. He arranged for the sale of Municipal Light & Power when Mayor Ethan Berkowitz was in office, and his contracts with the city to house homeless individuals in his hotel properties has been worth hundreds of thousands of dollars.

The lobbying contract outlines specific safeguards to address potential conflicts of interest, requiring Mark Begich to disclose whether he is acting on behalf of the city in any meeting or communication with municipal officials. If no such disclosure is made, it will be presumed that he is not representing the city. Likewise, failure to disclose a conflict of interest will be taken to mean none exists.

The firm’s responsibilities include engaging with Alaska’s congressional delegation, monitoring and influencing key legislation, and pursuing federal funding opportunities on behalf of the city. Brownstein is also required to provide at least two briefings per year to both the Administration and Assembly, as well as regular written reports detailing its lobbying activities.

The contract comes at a time when Mayor Suzanne LaFrance and the Assembly are working to increase Anchorage’s influence in Washington, DC, and Juneau amid shifting federal and state funding priorities.

Also notable is that LaFrance’s chief of staff, Susanne Fleek-Green, formerly served as state director for Sen. Begich during his tenure in the US Senate and she served as former Mayor Ethan Berkowitz’ chief of staff, as well as her job in the Biden Administration running Lake Clark National Park and Preserve.

While Mark Begich is the Democrat uncle of Rep. Nick Begich III, a Republican currently representing Alaska in Congress, there is no indication that the contract would involve any lobbying directed at his nephew, the congressman. But the contract is awkward and does not acknowledge that conflict of interests that Mark Begich has.

The Assembly is scheduled to vote on the contract during its June 24 meeting. The agenda for the meeting is at this link.

Two hospitalized after small plane crash at Big Lake

Two men were seriously injured Tuesday morning when a small plane crashed at Big Lake Airport, prompting an emergency response from Alaska State Troopers and local first responders. The Big Lake Airport is essentially a 2,400-foot-long airstrip one nautical mile southeast of the central business district of Big Lake in the Matanuska-Susitna Borough.

The crash was reported at 9:36 am on June 24. According to the Alaska State Troopers, the aircraft involved was a Piper PA-32R-300, a single-engine plane commonly used for private flights.

Both the adult male pilot and an adult male passenger sustained serious injuries in the crash and were transported to a Mat-Su area hospital for treatment. Their current conditions have not been disclosed.

The National Transportation Safety Board has been notified and is expected to lead the investigation into the cause of the crash.

Senate parliamentarian axes Sen. Lee’s land sale provisions from Big Beautiful Bill

A sweeping federal land sale proposal by Sen. Mike Lee of Utah has been struck from the Senate version of President Donald Trump’s signature tax and immigration budget package following a ruling by Senate Parliamentarian Elizabeth MacDonough.

Lee’s plan would have opened millions of acres of Bureau of Land Management and Forest Service land for sale across 11 Western states.

The proposal, which was part of the Senate Energy and Natural Resources Committee’s budget reconciliation bill, targeted the sale of 0.5% to 0.75% of BLM and Forest Service lands in Alaska, Arizona, California, Colorado, Idaho, Nevada, New Mexico, Oregon, Utah, Washington, and Wyoming. In all, about 82 million acres in Alaska alone were eligible for consideration under this plan, although the total mandated sale across all states was capped at 2.2 to 3.3 million acres over five years.

The parliamentarian, who is the rules arbiter of the Senate, deemed the proposal incompatible with the strict requirements of the budget reconciliation process. Elizabeth MacDonough ruled on Monday that the provision violated the “Byrd” rule, which mandates that reconciliation measures must have a direct impact on federal spending, revenue, or the debt limit.

Lee signaled he is not backing down.

Lee wrote on X, “Housing prices are crushing families and keeping young Americans from living where they grew up. We need to change that. Thanks to YOU—the AMERICAN PEOPLE—here’s what I plan to do: 1. REMOVE ALL Forest Service land. We are NOT selling off our forests. 2. SIGNIFICANTLY REDUCE the amount of BLM land in the bill. Only land WITHIN 5 MILES of population centers is eligible. 3. Establish FREEDOM ZONES to ensure these lands benefit AMERICAN FAMILIES. 4. PROTECT our farmers, ranchers, and recreational users. They come first. Yes, the Byrd Rule limits what can go in the reconciliation bill, but I’m doing everything I can to support President Trump and move this forward. Stay tuned. We’re just getting started.”

A revised proposal has already been reportedly submitted to the parliamentarian for consideration, removing Forest Service lands from the sale plan and limits eligible BLM parcels to those within five miles of existing population centers, among other restrictions.

In total, MacDonough has ruled 32 provisions out of bounds under reconciliation, including several other energy and resource-related items. Among them are the fast-tracking of offshore oil and gas development, the undoing of Biden-era fee reductions for renewable energy projects on federal land, and forcing a full vote on the Ambler Road in Alaska.

Anchorage Assembly moves to silence critics with new discretionary limit on public testimony

The liberal majority on the Anchorage Assembly is moving forward with yet another restriction on public participation, with a new rule that would allow the chair to block individuals from testifying more than once per quarter.

The proposed change, which is embedded in a broader package of procedural rules, states:

“If the person requesting an appearance has submitted multiple appearance requests within a 90-day period, the chair may, at their discretion, limit the speaker to one appearance every quarter. The clerk shall provide written notice to the speaker on behalf of the chair prior to denying a request pursuant to this subsection.”

In other words, it will depend on whether the chairman of the Assembly likes the testifier.

This latest proposal is just the newest layer in a pattern of measures adopted by the Assembly that are designed to suppress dissent and limit public participation..

The Assembly already enforces several restrictions on how and when residents may testify:

  • Time limits: Individuals are limited to three minutes of comment per agenda item.
  • One chance to speak: Residents may only testify once on each item, even if the item spans multiple meetings or amendments.
  • Mandatory sign-ups: Testifiers must sign up in advance, often online, and in some cases are required to summarize their comments in writing ahead of time.
  • Content restrictions: Comments must remain on-topic, and rules prohibit any “criticism or attacks” on individuals — even public officials.

The rule barring criticism has been inconsistently applied and has drawn fire from residents who view it as a way to shut down legitimate grievances. The chair, currently Assemblyman Chris Constant, retains wide discretion to cut off comments for what he deems inappropriate behavior or language.

Several high-profile incidents have fueled concern that Assembly leadership is more interested in silencing the public than hearing from them.

In one recent incident, Assembly Chair Chris Constant was caught on camera mouthing an expletive (“F— you”) at a woman waiting to testify during a heated meeting. The moment was captured on video. Watch the clip here.

In another case, a young Anchorage man spoke passionately during public comment about his decision to leave the city due to deteriorating conditions. After respectfully calling out the Assembly’s decisions, Chairman Chris Constant lashed out at the man and audience, calling them “disrespectful.” Watch the exchange here.

Both instances sparked outrage among citizens who say Assembly leaders show open contempt for the people they serve.

The proposed quarterly limit is yet another mechanism to insulate the Assembly from accountability and avoid difficult conversations. While proponents claim the move is about “efficiency,” the real motivation is to stifle frequent critics and prevent ongoing scrutiny from the public.

The rule change would grant the Assembly chair nearly unilateral power to decide who gets to speak and how often.

In recent years, residents have noted that the Assembly has become less welcoming to public participation. With meetings dominated by procedural formalities, a limited window for public input, and an overt hostility toward criticism, the suppression has worked, as public attendance at Assembly meetings has dropped dramatically.

The ordinance can be found at this link under the new public hearings agenda item. The Anchorage Assembly meeting begins at 5 pm on the ground floor of the Loussac Library in Anchorage. Agenda and agenda packet are at this link.

Anchorage Assembly chairman sabotages vagrant crackdown with $15 million ‘poison pill’ tax

An ordinance aimed at clearing illegal encampments from Anchorage parks and playgrounds faces a dramatic twist at tonight’s Anchorage Assembly meeting.

Assembly Chairman Chris Constant is introducing a substitute version — or “S version” — that would attach a $15 million tax-funded price tag for enforcement, in a move designed to kill the proposal from within.

The original ordinance, backed by conservative Assembly Members Scott Myers, Jared Goecker, and Keith McCormick, seeks to prohibit unauthorized camping, squatting, taking over and criminal activity on public lands. The gained public support from residents frustrated with rising crime, drug use, and organized theft rings operating out of makeshift encampments in municipal green spaces.

However, the core ordinance faces opposition from the Assembly’s liberal majority, who have resisted similar enforcement-first approaches in the past.

Now, with Constant’s “S version,” the ordinance would require the city to raise $15 million from taxpayers to fund enforcement efforts — an amendment that could turn the tide of public sentiment against it and force the ordinance’s own sponsors to vote against it.

The sudden fiscal attachment is a “poison pill,” designed to sink the original ordinance without appearing to oppose it outright.

The maneuver comes after weeks of increasing crime and arson in vagrant encampments, with growing demands from Anchorage residents for visible action on the city’s drug and mental illness crisis, particularly in neighborhoods like Fairview and Spenard, where residents have reported encampments overtaking public spaces.

Last week, when the city began abatement of the Davis Park “SLAZ” encampment, the squatters lit numerous fires in the park and created a public safety crisis. While that camp has been cleared (and burned), the vagrants seem to be edging back into it.

The original ordinance would have authorized law enforcement to remove illegal campers from parks, trails, and playgrounds, and impose fines or criminal penalties for repeat offenses. It also sought to prevent areas from being re-occupied once cleared.

Assembly Chair Constant’s S version, added to the meeting agenda just hours before the scheduled public hearing, shifts the focus from enforcement to cost without offering a concrete plan for how the $15 million would be spent or what departments would administer the funds.

Constant is weaponizing the budget process to undermine serious public safety legislation.

That section of the S version effectively proposes creating a new tax — subject to voter approval — specifically earmarked to fund the enforcement and social services related to illegal encampments and displaced homeless individuals. But in doing so, it raises a serious question:

Why create a new tax for something the existing Alcohol Tax was already supposed to fund?

When voters approved Anchorage’s Alcohol Tax in 2020, they were told the funds — roughly $12 to $15 million annually — would go toward public safety and law enforcement support, substance misuse prevention and treatment, mental health services, and homelessness response, including shelter, case management, and outreach.

The Alcohol Tax was sold to the public as a long-term solution to reduce vagrancy, substance abuse, and the visible impact of homelessness on public spaces.

Now, by proposing another tax levy dedicated to exactly those same goals — “addressing prohibited campsites” and “providing for the management and care of displaced homeless persons” — the S version duplicates the stated purpose of the Alcohol Tax, implying those funds are either misallocated, insufficient, or mismanaged. It also creates a political trap: If conservatives vote for the ordinance, they’re effectively endorsing a new tax. If they vote against it, they kill their own anti-crime measure. The new tax effort shifts the focus from enforcement to taxation, and would delay immediate action on public safety while punting the solution to a future election.

    The Anchorage Assembly meeting begins at 5 p.m. tonight at the Loussac Library, with the encampment ordinance set for public hearing. A large turnout is expected.

    The agenda and documents can be found at this link.

    Surprise $75K for free rides for Fairview hits Anchorage Assembly agenda for Tuesday vote

    The Anchorage Assembly is set to consider a $75,000 spending proposal at its Tuesday meeting that would fund weekend shuttle service to grocery stores for residents of the Fairview neighborhood. The proposed spending is a surprise “laid on the table” agenda item placed at the last minute in order to prevent public participation.

    Proposed by Mayor Suzanne LaFrance, the spending aims to address the community impact of the recent closure of the Carrs grocery store on Gambell Street, which shut its doors on May 10.

    The store, for 50 years a neighborhood grocery and pharmacy for Fairview residents, has long been a hang out for inebriates, thieves, and vagrants. It closed due to financial losses from chronic shoplifting and due to broader public safety issues for both employees and shoppers in the area. Rather than addressing lawlessness, LaFrance and the liberal Assembly are providing shuttle services.

    The mayor’s proposal would provide free rides to grocery stores located approximately two miles away in Midtown Anchorage, including Fred Meyer and Carrs at the intersection of New Seward Highway and West Northern Lights Boulevard. The service would run on Saturdays and Sundays through October 27, when Anchorage’s transportation department is expected to implement adjustments to broader transit services.

    The weekend shuttle program would be operated by NeighborWorks Alaska, a local nonprofit organization. If approved, the temporary service would serve as a stopgap solution, but could continue indefinitely.

    The Assembly is expected to vote on the measure during its June 24 regular meeting that begins at 5 pm at the Loussac Library ground floor meeting room. The spending is a “laid on the table” item, which is supposed to be reserved for emergencies but is used by the Assembly when it does not want to give the public advance warning about an action. The public can watch the meeting at this link.

    The agenda is at this link.