Final hurdle: CDC says go ahead and shoot the kids with Pfizer Covid vaccine


The head of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, the last hurdle to using the Covid vaccines on young children, has given its OK. As expected, CDC Director Rochelle Walensky on Tuesday gave her blessing to the Pfizer-BioNTech Covid-19 vaccine for children ages 5 to 11 years.

“As a mom, I encourage parents with questions to talk to their pediatrician, school nurse or local pharmacist to learn more about the vaccine and the importance of getting their children vaccinated,” Dr. Walensky said Tuesday.

Last week, another top health official in the Biden Administration referred to her trusted status as a mother in recommending the vaccine for children:

“As a mother and a physician, I know that parents, caregivers, school staff, and children have been waiting for today’s authorization. Vaccinating younger children against COVID-19 will bring us closer to returning to a sense of normalcy,” said Acting FDA Commissioner Janet Woodcock, M.D. “Our comprehensive and rigorous evaluation of the data pertaining to the vaccine’s safety and effectiveness should help assure parents and guardians that this vaccine meets our high standards.”

The approval process went exactly as planned, with the FDA giving its approval quickly last Friday after its advisory panel gave the agency the thumbs up.

There are 28 million children between the ages of 5 to 11. The vast majority of them who get Covid experience the mildest of symptoms, although future variants of the virus could effect them differently. According to the FDA, 146 deaths have occurred due to Covid in this age group.

The shot for kids is given in two doses, three weeks apart, and it is a lower dose than the adult versions. The dosage is based on age, not on size.

The state of Alaska has ordered 33,000 pediatric vaccine doses.

But not everyone is onboard. Last week, at a summit in Anchorage, leading doctors from around the country took the contrarian point of view and warned Alaskans to not use this vaccine on children — at least not now.


  1. An FDA vaccine advisory panel on Tuesday voted unanimously 17-0 in favor shooting up kids aged 5-11 with Pfizer’s experimental mRNA injection with panelist Dr Eric Rubin stating, “we’re never going to learn about how safe this vaccine is unless we start giving it.”

    Kind of like Pelosi’s, “We have to pass the bill to see what’s in it…”.


  2. Quite the genius plan;

    Release a bio-weapon. Whip up the fear. Promote a product to “protect” from the bio-weapon. Keep the fear going with statistics and constant media doom-saying. Spread more infection through vaccination. Tell parents that their child is at risk. Convince the parent that the ‘right thing to do’ is to get their kid jabbed. Fearful parents line up for their booster and kids for their first shot.
    Deny any adverse affects.
    Profit off the vaccine. Profit off the injuries caused by the vaccine. Profit off the health issues down the line. Convince the sheep that the issues they have with their health is “hereditary” and continue to profit off them throughout their whole life with medicine and medicine to counteract the side effects of the first medicine.
    If I were an evil man, this would be how I profit off the bleeding hearts.

    • So wait, I thought COVID was no worse than the common cold. Are you saying some evil entity went to all this trouble to release a cold on the world?

      If you were an evil man, you’d be in jail. Because you would not be able to come with an intelligent plan to not get caught.

      • If it were true, it could be that they did a crappy job, it is designed to mutate (possibly with the help of the ‘ vaccine’), or the real weapon is the ‘vaccine’.
        But I dig the cut of your snark.

  3. “As a mother and a physician, I know that parents, caregivers, school staff, and children have been waiting for today’s authorization. Vaccinating younger children against COVID-19 will bring us closer to returning to a sense of normalcy,”
    Sooo, when enough people are vaxxed all restrictions come off? No more masking if you’re vaxxed because you have complete protection? And if you’re vaxxed you can no longer shed the virus?
    Except that these are all falsehoods. Vaxxed shed as much or more virus. Vaxxed get the same or higher breakthroughs. And the limited protection for those at risk (of which healthy children are not) lasts just a few months.
    And they have no idea whatsoever of long term health effects.
    Some parents must really hate their children to subject them to becoming guinea pigs in this experiment. Of course these are likely the same ones who aborted other children, so it makes sense.

    • Discuss it with your physician. If your physician tells you your child should get the ‘vaccine’, get a new physician.

  4. “The head of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, the last hurdle to using the Covid vaccines on young children, has given its OK.”
    A disgusting characterization.

    No ine is “using vaccines on children”. Children are to be “given the vaccine.”

    Also disgusting: “CDC says go ahead and shoot the kids “
    Just disgusting.

    • Paid off CDC deciders? I wonder if any of them are the same ones at the CDC that participated in performing the Tuskegee experiments? Nah, probably all dead and in hell by now.
      A rare moment for you though, Dan s. You got something right.
      It is disgusting. Using dangerous ‘vaccines’ on children is disgusting.

  5. Why would a parent allow a shot/vaccine that offers no protection to be given to a child who is not at risk from the virus?

    Of equal importance, why is the State of Alaska buying this poison snake oil?

  6. Is the headline a direct quote or your editorial spin? Did you get the vaccine Susanne Downing? Your readers would like to know.

    • Hi Brian. Yes, readers of MRAK and listeners to the podcast already know that I am fully vaccinated including a booster shot. I received my first shot in January, second in February, and booster in October. And I recommend people in the over-60 age group give very serious consideration to the pros and cons. I did, because I’ve long had an interest in health issues, and I’m fairly certain — but not positive — it was the correct move for my age. Thank you for your question. – sd

      • “I’m fairly certain — but not positive” is honest, common sense, and another reason why I trust MRAK more than MSM.
        Any absolute opinion on Covid, in any direction, expressed by anyone, even the so called “experts” is speculation, based on conjecture, re-enforced by supposition. Anyone claiming to “know” some pro or con of Covid thinks much more highly of themselves than they ought to. I think, or I believe, is the only honest position any of us can take.

        • Not really. There is now plenty of data out there to show that HCQ and Ivermectin are effective and safe, the China virus is not that deadly for an overwhelming percentage of the population, the experimental gene therapies are largely ineffective, they are unproven, they are dangerous and especially to young men, natural immunity is better, masks do basically nothing, lockdowns don’t do squat, and ‘vax’ mandates are unconstitutional tyranny.

    • Everybody knows the answer to this question already why are you picking on Suzanne? What happened to my body my choice or does that only apply to people who don’t want to get a shot?

  7. Australia Is Now Threatening Citizens With Seizure Of Homes & Bank Accounts Over Covid Violations

    Multiple reports out of Australia over the past days have confirmed that state and territory governments are threatening to seize the homes and bank accounts of citizens over unpaid “COVID violation” fines. This as much of the country’s population are now living under vaccine mandates linked to employment: take the jab or face termination, many Aussies are being told.

    For example, a new report in Daily Mail has reviewed fresh government data compiled by the Queensland health authority. It found that “Queenslanders who received fines for breaking Covid-19 rules risk having their homes seized and bank accounts frozen in a government crackdown to collect $5.2 million in repayments.”


  8. less than 200 children have died in this age group, which is still tragic beyond words, but these lunatics will pump 28 million of our children with an experimental shot. Has humanity always been this crazy? Asking for a friend….

  9. The wording in the headline of this story is incendiary and irresponsible. This is not responsible journalism.

    • I think what the editor is referring to as the final hurdle was that all the boosters have been approved and this is the final age group to be approved to get the shot. There are plenty of hurdles to still jump over one of them being a 100% cure rate or nobody has to die rate but you trying to twist things doesn’t help your cause.

      • A zero percent mortality with a virus like this is not possible. Never has been. Never will be.
        The only question is how much individual liberty leftists and their useful idiots can destroy in our society trying to reach utopia.

  10. The obvious and increasingly apparent lack of efficacy for the vaccines are creating problems for the CDC and the pharma corporations who now own the CDC and FDA.
    Instead of the CDC requiring quality, effective and safe medicines that are being forced on the public, and creating vaccine resistant viral mutations, they simply changed the definition of “vaccine” on the website on September 1st for the public.
    Pre August 31 original website CDC definition of vaccination:
    “The act of introducing a vaccine into the body to produce IMMUNITY to a specific disease.”

    After Sept 1 CDC website definition of vaccination:
    “The act of introducing a vaccine into the body to produce PROTECTION from a specific disease.”

    For concerned parents and public who might have questions for these officials here are the specific CDC names:
    Valerie Morelli.
    Alycia E. Downs.

    • Sadly, that was given almost half a century ago, courtesy of the Supreme Court’s 1973 Roe v. Wade decision.
      This latest is just taking that to one of its logical extremes.

  11. 66 kids die every year from covid. I guess they’re trying to get that number down to zero. Some people say that kids aren’t infected by the covid and 99.99% of them survive if they do get it and even one death is an acceptable number.

    • They should get the number of kids dying from lightning strikes down first. For one year, all children are locked down. If a child goes outside, the parents should be incarcerated.

        • Agreed! Lock everyone down and destroy economies until that number is zero.
          A nice aside, then the government can fight poverty to save the starving kids.
          America’s war on poverty is a shoe-in for success.


    Pfizer is telling young children that their experimental mRNA covid injection will make them “superheroes” and give them “superpowers.”

    Did Maddie De Gray get superpowers after being enrolled as a guinea pig for Pfizer’s experimental injection?

    She’s just one of many “superhero” children the supervillains at Pfizer used to test their experimental mRNA injection and then hung out to dry after suffering from horrible side effects.


  13. Taken directly from the FDA, there are 28,000,000 children in this target group. Of those, 146 have died from COVID. What’s that death rate? .0005% Approximately the same as being killed by lightning, .0007%
    Show of hands, how many here obsess about their kids being struck by lightning day by day? We’d call that crazy, right?
    Just sayin’

    • We need to get those lightning strike deaths to zero! Forget our freedoms (including the freedom of children). No more children can die.

      • Can’t happen. Has never happened. Won’t ever happen.
        How many lives are you willing to destroy to attempt to get there?
        It’s like socialism. You can’t equally distribute prosperity, but you can make everyone nearly equal in misery in the attempt.

      • And they would’ve had better chances if they were treated with HCQ or ivermectin than with the clot shot.

  14. Is it true that the formula has been changed for the kids’ shot? I read that Tromethamine has been added, a heart attack medicine that has a whole additional list of side effects.

    • Page 14 in the Pfizer paperwork submitted to the FDA


      Authorization is being requested for a modified formulation of the Pfizer COVID-19 Vaccine. Each dose of this formulation contains 10 μg of a nucleoside-modified messenger RNA (mRNA) encoding the viral spike glycoprotein of SARS-CoV-2 that is formulated in lipid particles and supplied as a frozen suspension in multiple dose vials.

      To provide a vaccine with an improved stability profile, the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine for use in children 5-11 years of age uses tromethamine (Tris) buffer instead of the phosphatebuffered saline (PBS) as used in the previous formulation and excludes sodium chloride and potassium chloride.

      Tromethamine is a blood acid reducer which is used to stabilize patients with heart attacks.

      Side Effects — Respiratory depression, local irritation, tissue inflammation, injection site infection, febrile response, chemical phlebitis, venospasm (vein spasms), hypervolemia, IV thrombosis, extravasation (with possible necrosis and sloughing of tissues), transient decreases in blood glucose concentrations, hypoglycemia, and hepatocellular necrosis with infusion via low-lying umbilical venous catheters.

      • Says Greg – that I can totally trust – quoting big pharma – that hasn’t lied about any of this – even on camera several times.

        • One thing that you can trust in is that after doing research, I do believe what I say. It might not always be right, but at the time of posting it’s what I truly believe. Sometimes my warped sense of humor clouds the unsuspecting reader.

          • We may have all of this in common… but I’m right on this.
            I truly hope you survive your clot shots for the next 10 years.

  15. Thank Dunleavy for his recent stand against federal mandates. In the next breath ask him to stop bringing the shots through the State and distributing is to the Anchorage School District. Don’t use the Covid relief money this way!

  16. It is clear that the sheep didn’t hear or went to the symposium Senator Reinbold and her sister put together with the top leading scientists and PHd’s from all over the country including the virologist defector from WUHON China who was there as this was developed and stated how Fauci and the current administration with Bill and Malinda gates funded the entire thing and warned everyone not to take it, and that it was a designed weapon. So go get your 2nd and 3rd shots, soon the depopulation will take place and all you liberal sheep will be gone. Funny how other Dr’s from Anchorage are now trying to take credit FALSLY for what the Senator did, not to worry you will be exposed soon enough.

  17. We have learned that children are likely to recover very quickly with early treatment and then then have immunity. Also, the wuhan ailment is not the one circulating always but the injection is designed for the wuhan illness. Also, we are learning that the injectjon contents go to the undeveloped reproductive systems perhaps with interference with ability to start families later in life which might be heartbreaking. We find that the injections are expected to continue for the foreseeable future for the wuhan ailment as the disease continues to mutate among tthe many varieties of humans on earth rendering the injections as imprecise instruments. We find that the injections seem to allow the ailment to break through after injection with resulting hospitalizations. So is it wooth it? To you?

    • The vast, vast, vast majority of children recover with no treatment.
      The rest would recover with better chances than with the clot shot if they were treated with HCQ or Ivermectin.
      Parents that get their children this clot shot are monsters.

  18. For some reason, I keep coming back unto this statement….

    “As a mother and a physician, I know that parents, caregivers, school staff, and children have been waiting for today’s authorization. Vaccinating younger children against COVID-19 will bring us closer to returning to a sense of normalcy,” said Acting FDA Commissioner Janet Woodcock, M.D.”

    “Returning to a SENSE of normalcy.”

    NOT ‘returning to normalcy’…or even ‘returning to a past normal environment or existence’, but as a SENSE of normalcy, within that the supposedly ‘normalcy’ indicated is not actually attained, but the SENSE of it is….well, what exactly, is that SENSE, and how does that actually work?

    Is ‘normality’, or past ‘normality’ actually achieved, or is the SENSE of said ‘normality’ simply a message of confirmation by capitulation as unto the ‘NEW’ normal that is being so actively pushed unto society by those, especially within supposed ‘power’, that the individuals ‘SENSE’ of normality has overridden what was, and still should be, ‘normal’?

Comments are closed.