Thursday, May 8, 2025
Home Blog Page 948

Memo: Anchorage health chief warns that licensing homeless shelters could mean more will be unsheltered in Anchorage

Heather Harris, the director of the Anchorage Health Department, says the proposed ordinance that would require homeless shelters to be licensed by the municipality comes with a number of risks that need to be addressed first.

In a memo to Assemblywoman Meg Zaletel and the acting mayor’s chief of staff, Harris warned about several of the unintended consequences of requiring licenses for nonprofit shelter operators, including:

Provider burden: Although it may not be the intent of the ordinance, licensing may burden shelter providers with additional costs, including employee costs, Harris said.

Timeline and costs of process: Harris pointed out that regulatory compliance such as background checks will increase the costs of running a shelter, and such background checks can take a lot of time, which can additionally burden the shelter operators, who are not generally operating with a lot of excess staff or funds.

“Has the Assembly investigated costs shouldered by providers to go through the Conditional Use Permit (CUP) process?” Harris asked. “Are the insurance requirements in alignment with threshold norms, or will this licensing process increase costs?

“If there are costs on either side, what level of risk are we asking providers to take and are they going to be willing to take those risks to provide a public service?” she asked in her memo.

Unintentional decrease in shelter system capacity: “… space limitations and the burdensome nature of these regulations could minimize the amount of people experiencing homelessness served,” Harris wrote.

Fiscal risk: “Compared to other business ventures, like alcohol and marijuana distributors, who stand to make a significant profit at the end of their licensing process, shelter providers are not in a profit-seeking structure. The initial capital investment has a financial benefit once achieving licensing that bears a cost/benefit analysis. This may not be true for future providers.”

“Some providers currently providing services (some outside of their core service) may decide to stop delivering services. In October 2020, at least two providers publicly stated that they would stop sheltering this population if required to comply,” Harris wrote.

While the municipality is working to get homeless out of the Sullivan Arena, “increasing the risk of decreasing the shelter system capacity is a significant concern,” Harris added.

Background checks: In addition to potentially being slow and/or fiscally burdensome, the ordinance could threaten removing the ladder for employment opportunities that many providers allow for in having previous participants become staff. This means as people become more functional, they can be paid to take on duties in the shelter, and this provides them with structure, work experience, and a sense of purpose, all important to finding other work in the future. Requiring a background check for client-to-staff members would create a barrier to overcoming homelessness.

“Are the background check requirements for all facilities and all clients? Clarification about the motivation for background checks could be helpful. Moreover, weighing out that motivation to the benefits of staff with lived experience (who may be barred from employment by currently drafted license requirements) would be important,” Harris noted.

Human capital: Harris said that two or three municipal staff will be required to start a shelter licensing program and maintain it over time. She said that the initial investment to establish processes at the municipality and the workflow would be substantial.

“Therefore, there needs to be at least a supervisor and a coordinator to do this work, though two coordinators would be more realistic,” she wrote. She added that the relationships required to be an effective compliance officer are time intensive and that providers need to trust that the compliance officer understands them and their services to actively work with them on improvement plans as needed.

“When there are problems, they are incredibly time-intensive, be that inspection, re-inspection, improvement planning, investigations, revocation processes, etc.,” she wrote.

Harris on April 21, 2021 also made a formal request for an economic impact summary as it relates to the added work burden at the municipality.

Harris also noted that public hearings about homeless shelters are “extremely volatile” and “politicized.” Rather than the Anchorage Assembly having public hearings about possible licensing of shelters in Anchorage, she recommended that “making hearings of this nature public, rather than running it through the Administrative Hearing Office, potentially provides a platform for ridicule and rancor. It would be recommended to explore alternative options.”

Read: Targeting faith-based shelters, Assembly plans to require a license to operate

An ordinance to require licenses for shelter providers is being discussed by the Anchorage Assembly, and those providing shelters, such as faith-based groups, are concerned that the regulations that follow the ordinance will be burdensome and are intended to put them out of service.

The ordinance has been the subject of two town hall meetings this week and will be on the Tuesday agenda of the Anchorage Assembly, whose meetings start at 5 pm at the Loussac Library ground floor Assembly Chambers.

Best high school in Alaska? Petersburg

2

U.S. News and World Report says that Petersburg High School in Southeast Alaska is ranked Number 1 within Alaska.

The advanced placement participation rate at Petersburg High School is 30%, the total minority enrollment is 32%, and 50% of students are economically disadvantaged. Petersburg High School is ranked #904 in the National Rankings. Schools are ranked on their performance on state-required tests, graduation and how well they prepare students for college. 

The rest of the top 10 schools in Alaska, according to the annual report, are:

2. Mat-Su Career & Tech Ed High School

3. Homer High School

4. South Anchorage High School

5. Cordova Jr/Sr High School

6. Polaris K-12 School

7. Eagle River High School

8. Juneau-Douglas High School

9. West Valley High School

10. Chugiak High School

Thomas Jefferson High School for Science and Technology in Virginia is No. 1 in the publication’s national ranking of best high schools, as well as among magnet schools. BASIS Chandler in Arizona is at the top of the list for charter schools, and High Technology High School in New Jersey is the No. 1 STEM school.

Slide show: Over 200 attend memorial for former Speaker Gail Phillips

2

The political leaders of Alaska turned out en masse to remember former House Speaker Gail Phillips, who died in March.

Among those who attended were former Gov. Sean Parnell and former First Lady Sandy Parnell, U.S. Sen. Lisa Murkowski and Congressman Don Young. Lt. Gov. Kevin Meyer, Senate President Peter Micciche, and Anchorage Mayor-elect Dave Bronson and his wife Deb.

Alaska Republican Party National Committeewoman Cynthia Henry attended, and former Rep. Larry Baker was spotted, as was senatorial candidate Kelly Tshibaka. State Sen. Natasha Von Imhof and former State Sen. Ben Stevens were in the crowd, as was Nick and Dharna Begich.

Hobo Jim sang a ballad in Phillips’ memory outside of Kincaid Chalet under partly cloudy skies.

An open house continued after the memorial service until early evening. The family accepted donations to the newly created Gail Phillips leadership fund, a scholarship at University of Alaska Fairbanks. More about her life can be found at https://gailphillipsalaska.com.

Read: Passing Gail Phillips, former Alaska House Speaker

Born on May 15, 1944, to Lois and Wallace McIver in Juneau, Phillips was the oldest of seven girls and grew up in Council and Nome, Alaska. She spent her early summers in Council at the mining camp owned by her father and grandfather.

Phillips worked for Senate President Tim Kelly before she was sworn into the 25th Alaska State Legislature in January 1991. In 1993, Rep. Phillips became House Majority Leader before being elected Speaker of the House in 1995, a position she held for four years. She served on many boards and councils throughout her life, many with the University of Alaska, Alaska Aviation Museum and resource development causes. Phillips was an active member of the Homer United Methodist Church, and served on its Board.

Speaker Phillips won many awards and recognitions throughout her life. She is survived by her husband of 56 years, Walt; daughter, Robin Phillips; daughter, Kim Griffith; grandsons, Scott and Jace Griffith; her sisters, Barbie, Kay, Janny, Cheryl, Susan and Karen and their families; and many more grandnieces, grandnephews, cousins and friends.

Raffle: Trip to McNeil River to see the bears

The Alaska Department of Fish and Game and the Outdoor Heritage Foundation of Alaska have a raffle for anyone wishing to visit the McNeil River State Game Sanctuary this summer.

Viewing the world’s largest congregation of brown bears at McNeil River is a highly sought-after privilege. The 2021 season lottery has concluded, and all permits have been issued; however, to provide an additional opportunity and to raise funds to help support Fish and Game’s programs, two additional permits are being offered through a raffle conducted by OHFA.

One winner will be selected and entitled to assign the two permits to whomever they wish (certain limitations will apply). The permit holders will also be provided lodging in Homer, Alaska, and seaplane transportation to the sanctuary.

Further information and online ticket purchases are available at OHFA’s website at www.OHFAK.org. Individual raffle tickets cost $20, or 6 for $100, and 40 for $500.

Revenue generated from this raffle will help support wildlife conservation including projects in Alaska state sanctuaries and refuges, and education in outdoor traditions.

Denali Commission announcement in 3-2-1

Garrett Boyle, a legislative aide to Sen. Lisa Murkowski, and Gretchen Fauske, of the University of Alaska, are the two finalists for the federal co-chair of the Denali Commission, according to sources who say that the announcement will be made this week.

Former State Sen. John Torgerson serves as the acting federal co-chair; he was appointed after the resignation of Jason Hoke of Glennallen, who came under scrutiny after an employee filed a sexual harassment complaint against him.

Read: Hoke out at Denali Commission after complaints filed

The Secretary of Commerce appoints the co-chair after consultation with the federal delegation.

The Denali Commission came as a result of legislation championed by the late Sen. Ted Stevens in 1998 and has since been a catalyst for rural development across the state. It helps fund transportation facilities, clinics, fuel storage and assists communities being harmed by coastal erosion.

The appointment is political in nature.

Fauske is the associate director for the University of Alaska Center for Economic Development. She is responsible for leading the entrepreneurship, marketing, and outreach efforts of CED as well as providing strategic leadership for both CED and the UAA Business Enterprise Institute. Prior to joining CED, she worked in the State of Alaska Division of Economic Development, for U.S. Senator Lisa Murkowski, and in the private sector.

Boyle oversees the drafting of legislation and drives the policy initiatives for Murkowski. He also advocates for Murkowski’s legislative and policy agenda and is considered her lead subject expert on Medicare, Medicaid, FDA, Social Security, private insurance, the Affordable Care Act, and all other health related issues. He has helped her vet various judicial nominees, including two Supreme Court nominations.

.

Dunleavy reappoints Craig Richards to Permanent Fund Corp. board

Alaska Gov. Mike Dunleavy today announced the reappointment of former Attorney General Craig Richards to the Alaska Permanent Fund Corporation Board of Trustees for the term of July 1, 2021 to July 1, 2025. Richards served on the Board of Trustees from 2015 to 2016 and was reappointed in 2017.

“As a Trustee, Craig has a proven record of professional stewardship of the Alaska Permanent Fund. Following a year of record growth, I am fully confident in his continued efforts with the Board to wisely manage and protect the state’s most valuable asset,” Dunleavy said.

Craig Richards majored in finance at the University of Virginia, received his Masters in Business Administration from Duke University and Juris Doctorate from Washington & Lee University. After serving as law clerk for Judge Beistline, Richards worked in private practice with a focus on oil and gas. He served as Attorney General for the State of Alaska from 2014 to 2016 and has since reentered private practice in Anchorage.

The Alaska Permanent Fund was established in 1976 via a constitutional amendment approved by the voters, and today has a balance of $80,719,900,000. A State-owned corporation, its earnings help pay for state government and a portion of the earnings are returned to the people of Alaska as their share of oil royalties, also known as Permanent Fund dividends.

Alaska deserves a senator who will unleash fullness of our energy potential

By KELLY TSHIBAKA

In many ways, Alaska’s lands are sacred; they have been blessed with rich resource endowment, which have always been the key to our subsistence and economy.

The problem is that environmental extremists, now given renewed power by President Joe Biden’s administration, have prevented us from realizing our true potential of rising prosperity, self-sufficiency, and economic independence, balanced with environmental conservation. 

Alaskans deserve a U.S. senator who will fight for an Alaska-centric agenda that will unleash our enormous energy potential to create jobs and lower our fuel costs, not one who bows down to extremists and enables a radical D.C.-based agenda that wants to turn our state into a national park for the rest of the country. My energy platform will promote environmentally responsible growth and job creation in the energy industries which drive the Alaska economy.

Permitting processes for oil and gas leases on public lands are onerous and time consuming, taking years to complete. In the case of access to the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge (ANWR), federal regulatory restrictions were in place for 60 years before President Trump cleared the way for energy production. Biden then suspended oil and gas leases in ANWR on his first day in office.

When bureaucrats don’t support something, they love to drag out the process. “Go slow” means “no go.” It costs our companies a lot of time and money, which often makes projects cost prohibitive, preventing Alaska workers from earning money to support their families. When I’m your senator, I will call for permitting processes to be completed within a defined time frame.

As your senator, I also will advocate for Alaska and First Alaskans—not the federal government—to own a majority of the land in Alaska. Alaskans should have the right to access and develop resources on the federal land within our state. President Trump was in the process of transferring 28 million acres of land to Alaska before Biden took office and promptly stopped the plan.

To make matters worse, Biden’s Interior Secretary Deb Haaland has started the process of seizing 44 million more acres, trying to take more land from Alaskans and federalizing nearly 73% of the state. 

We are owed land by the federal government, it’s as simple as that. Alaskans know best how to manage and responsibly develop our land and resources. No D.C. insider cares about the Alaskan environment more than the Alaskans who live and work here. We also develop resources in a more environmentally responsible way than the other countries from which the U.S. imports when the Biden administration prohibits Alaskan energy production. As your next senator, I will fight for timely completion of environmental and other regulatory reviews required for us to access and develop federal land. I also will demand the timely and orderly conveyance to Alaska of its public lands for potential development of natural resources.

Additionally, I will oppose carbon taxes on energy industries because it will increase costs on hard-working Alaskans who struggle to pay their bills. Carbon capture and sequestration technologies are much preferable to a carbon tax, because the private sector can develop and employ them to better deal with pollution, rather than simply making energy more expensive for Alaskans.

Our incumbent Sen. Lisa Murkowski has expressed openness to a carbon tax, as recently as October 2020, and it’s not the only area where she is failing us.

President Trump’s policies were demonstrably beneficial to Alaska, but Murkowski openly opposed him, both in his first election in 2016 and in his re-election campaign in 2020. This open antagonism of a president who was good for Alaska is not the kind of leadership our residents want. Nor does it help Alaska for Murkowski to openly support the Biden administration that is anti-mining, anti-oil and gas, and anti-Alaska.

Worse, Murkowski was the deciding vote in the Senate committee which advanced Haaland’s nomination for Interior Secretary. This means Murkowski is personally and singularly responsible for the imposition of the radical environmental agenda relentlessly targeting Alaska and opposing fossil fuel development in America. 

A senator’s real value is in the big moments, the critical votes, and Haaland’s nomination was one of those crucial times. Murkowski’s approval of Haaland will cost Alaska billions of dollars. It may make her popular with the D.C. cocktail party crowd, but it seriously hurts us back here at home. 

Murkowski also has failed to gain Alaska’s entry into an offshore revenue sharing agreement. Under the Gulf of Mexico Energy Security Act of 2006, Alabama, Louisiana, Mississippi, and Texas share hundreds of millions in revenues annually, which also support environmental conservation programs. Alaska has never been included in such an arrangement, which would have provided much-needed incentive for offshore exploration and production in Alaska. An energy revenue sharing pact for Alaska, similar to the one enjoyed by Gulf of Mexico states, would have grown the state’s economy, created jobs, and protected the environment.
 
All Alaskans ever want is fairness and the opportunity to access what is rightfully ours. The Gulf compact has been in place for 15 years and Lisa Murkowski has been in the Senate that entire time. Why was Alaska never brought to the table?

Alaska was once a place that afforded people abundant opportunity, but those days seem distant because of federal government overreach and overregulation, something our current senator has failed to adequately address. I have a fire in my heart to rebuild Alaska, and I believe that embracing the blessings of our bountiful natural resources is the key to that future.

Kelly Tshibaka is a Republican candidate for the United States Senate in Alaska.

Supreme Court rules tribal police can detain non-Natives on reservation land

In a case sure to reverberate in Alaska at some point, the U.S. Supreme Court has ruled that tribal police officers have authority to search and detain non-Indians who are suspected of breaking federal or state law on reservation land.

The case is United States v. Cooley, which concerns an arrest of a non-Native who was parked on the right of way of a federal highway that cuts across the Crow Indian Reservation in Montana. The tribal police offer found evidence on the man, Joshua James Cooley, including two semi-automatic weapons on the front seat. Subsequently, tribal police found methamphetamine in his truck.

Alaska has 229 federally recognized tribes, many of which have tribal police officers, but few of which are actual reservations.

Metlakatla in southern Southeast is a traditionally structured historic Indian reservation, the only one in Alaska that remained after the Alaska Native Claims Settlement Act was completed and Native corporations took the place of reservations. But since then, the Obama Administration allowed Alaska tribes to apply for “trust status” for their land, contrary to ANCSA. In 2017, an acre of land in Craig, a fishing community in Southeast Alaska became “Indian Country,” as the land was placed into federal trust status at the request of the tribe.

Read: One acre of Craig township becomes Indian Country

In 2018, the Trump Administration reversed the rule that allowed Alaska Natives to put land into federal trust. Now, a bill working its way through the Congress could reinstate the land-into-trust program.

Read Interior Department withdraws opinion on Alaska Native land into trust

Justice Stephen Breyer’s opinion this week appears to expand on the court’s 1981 decision in Montana v. United States, which gave limited law enforcement power to tribes in circumstances where a non-tribal member poses a threat to the “political integrity, economic security or health or welfare of the tribe.”

“To deny a tribal police officer authority to search and detain for a reasonable time any person he or she believes may commit or has committed a crime would make it difficult for tribes to protect themselves against ongoing threats,” Breyer wrote. “Such threats may be posed by, for instance, non-Indian drunk drivers, transporters of contraband or other criminal offenders operating on roads within the boundaries of a tribal reservation.”

In Alaska, the impact of the ruling may be drug-related in the near future in places adjacent to where village police officers are located. Eventually, the law may also be interpreted to cover things like fish and game management: In areas where the Federal Subsistence Board says only tribal subsistence users can harvest fish and game, will tribal enforcement officers go onto federal lands to enforce the law? That would be a matter that could end up in court in the future if a tribe says a non-tribal person fishing in an area posed an economic threat to the tribe.

Seafood favorite? Division of Elections launches mock election to help Alaskans learn how to vote confusing ballot in 2022

With Alaska’s new Ballot Measure 2 having passed in November, confusion reigns about how the elections will be conducted in 2022. Ask the average Alaskan who voted for Ballot Measure 2, and you’ll get a mangled description of how it actually works.

But the Alaska Division of Elections has set up an easy-to-use mock election that can help Alaskans better understand how they’ll be voting in the primary, and then how they’ll vote in November, 2022.

To see for yourself, you can click on this link and vote on the “best Alaska seafood.”

You’ll have a choice of everything from king salmon to geoduck clams — there’s a list of 18 Alaska seafood choices. You can pick just one in the “primary” that is going on right now.

Then, you can opt to look at the preliminary results and see the top four primary winners that will go on to the “general election.” The mock election has a feature that lets you see how many votes the current top four got in this first “final four” round.

The seafood primary will last two weeks, and then you’ll be able to take part in the ranked-choice general election for seafood.

The current top candidates advancing to the final four are Halibut, King Salmon, Sockeye Salmon, and King Crab, but only a few votes have been cast in the 24 hours since the game started.

Rankedchoice.co also allows interested persons to set up their own accounts and then create their own mock elections using their desired criteria. Must Read Alaska set one up at this link to rank the most biased mainstream media in Alaska.