Thursday, May 14, 2026
Home Blog Page 829

Meg Zaletel legal fight against her own recall cost city $30,000 in attorney fees, now awarded to recall group

Supreme Court ruling today awarded full attorney fees to citizen advocate Russell Biggs, after the Anchorage Municipal Clerk obstructed and delayed 10 months the release of a recall petition against Assembly member Meg Zaletel.

The blocking of the citizen recall effort against Zaletel cost the city $30,000 in legal fees, as well as another $100,000 for a special election that had to be held, when the delay prevented the recall from being placed on a regular election ballot.

The recall was prompted after Zaletel and leftists on the Assembly improperly closed the Assembly chambers to the public in July of 2020. The public could not witness the diversion of millions of dollars in CARES Act funds that were funneled to special project of the former Mayor Ethan Berkowitz and his Assembly allies.

Zaletel joined the municipal lawsuit in an attempt to block the recall petition. Biggs appealed this issue to the Supreme Court of Alaska, where Zaletel and Clerk Barbara Jones lost. The recall effort went forward, but the delays cause by by the Municipal Clerk Jones and Zaletel, led to the recall having to go to a special election, which gave Zaletel time to get national Big Union money to help her. Because it was a low participation election, she was able to survive. The delays worked.

The Recall process is incredibly difficult, expensive, and time consuming, Biggs said. It should not be made harder by highly partisan meddling of the Anchorage legal team and should not take a court case costing tens of thousands of dollars to work the mechanism that is available to citizens that allow them to hold their Assembly members accountable for clear violations of law.

Anchorage Assembly so fears the people, it doesn’t want them to vote on whether Muni Clerk should be elected

Anchorage Assembly majority leaders Suzanne LaFrance and Chris Constant issued statements on Monday opposing a draft ordinance that would have the people of Anchorage elect the Municipal Clerk, rather than having her appointed by the Assembly.

At the Regular Assembly Meeting on Tuesday, Aug. 23, the Assembly will take up AO 2022-13, an ordinance put forward by Mayor Dave Bronson that would ask voters if they want to amend the Anchorage Charter. With the statements issued by the two leftist leaders of the Assembly, it’s clear that the ordinance will fail.

At least some members of the public would like to take away the power the the Assembly over the Clerk, especially after numerous instances of election irregularities, refusal to release petitions that have been requested, and stonewalling members of the public who make public records requests.

The Municipal Clerk is responsible for a broad range of municipal functions, including clerking Assembly meetings, overseeing municipal business, running municipal elections, administering certain business, liquor, and marijuana licensing, coordinating and staffing the Boards of Adjustment and Ethics, and maintaining Assembly records. 

Assembly Chair Suzanne LaFrance said that if a clerk was elected who had no professional credentials for the position, the clerk could end up being a partisan politician “who is beholden to political leaders and campaign donors to retain their position.”

Currently, the clerk is beholden to political leaders on the Assembly.

“The proposed ordinance is a solution in search of a problem,” said Assembly Vice Chair Constant. “The Clerk’s Office runs efficiently with high ethical standards in service to the public and this proposal could damage that high level of service and proficiency. Given the current events around the mayor’s staffing and human resource practices, he’s not in a good position to make recommendations for how other branches of government should be organized, so we look forward to putting this idea to rest permanently.”

Constant is the politician who delivered an expensive bouquet of flowers to Clerk Barbara Jones during the middle of the counting of ballots last year, while he was working feverishly on the mayoral campaign of Forrest Dunbar. Clerk Jones owes her job to people who can remove her if she does not comply with their instructions or bend to their political pressure.

The ordinance offered by Bronson asks the public if they want the position to be elected by the people. It is not a vote on whether Jones should be the clerk.

Last year, the voters in Carlsbad, Calif. were asked whether or not they wanted their city clerk to continue to be elected or to be appointed. The citizens, allowed to vote on the matter, chose to continue with an elected clerk.

The Anchorage ordinance, which proposes a change to Anchorage Charter, requires a two-thirds affirmative vote by the Assembly. If passed, the change would be presented to qualified Anchorage voters as a ballot proposition in an upcoming election.

Assembly leadership, which has managed the Municipal Clerk in such a way as to sow distrust in the public, submitted an Assembly Memorandum with their position on the item: ancgov.info/AM455-2022.

The Assembly meeting starts at 5 pm on the ground floor of the Loussac Library. The meetings are also live on YouTube, although the video feed is often muted during times when the Assembly chair doesn’t want the public to view what is happening in the chamber.

More information about the meeting is at this link.

Bill Walker once signed MOU for gas contract to China’s Sinopec, which is now delisting from NY stock exchange

In 2017, former Gov. Bill Walker signed agreements with three large enterprises owned by the communist Chinese government; Sinopec was one of them.

The joint development agreement signed by Walker and Sinopec, the Bank of China, and China Investment Corporation, would lead to a China-built Alaska gasline, long a dream of Bill Walker, with contracts for Sinopec.

Last Friday, five of China’s largest state-owned companies, including Sinopec, said they will voluntarily remove themselves from U.S. stock exchanges rather than have transparent accounting, as required. Delisting can be voluntary or involuntary, but usually results when a company ceases operations, declares bankruptcy, merges, does not meet legal requirements, or decides to go private. Sinopec trades on the Hong Kong and Shanghai stock exchanges, as well as New York.

The move by Sinopec, PetroChina, China Life Insurance, Aluminum Corporation of China, and Sinopec Shanghai Petrochemical comes at a time of deteriorating relations between China and the United States. Sinopec is one of the largest oil and gas developers in the world, generating $456 billion in annual revenue and employing 385,691 workers.

But for Walker, the joint development agreement for Alaska’s gasline was nothing but opportunity for Alaska.

“This agreement has all five necessary signatories—the buyer, the lender, the investor, the developer and the state,” Walker said in 2017, as he announced the deal with the communist Chinese. “This is a big project with big players and big benefits.”

Walker, who won his election in 2014, took the gasline in a different direction than former Gov. Sean Parnell had. Parnell wanted private company investment, but Walker dismissed that direction, quickly nationalized the gasline and then started making deals with China and the Chinese-owned companies.

Before taking office, Walker said, “The fatal flaw of what [Parnell] is doing is, again, again, he has put control of Alaska’s future in the hands of companies that have competing projects around the world.”

GOVERNOR BILL WALKER BOWS TO CHINA PRESIDENT XI JINPING AS THE PRESIDENT’S CHINA AIR JET STOPS IN ANCHORAGE FOR REFUELING ON IN 2017.

Communist China President Xi JinPing had visited Walker in Alaska in 2017 in a refueling stopover from a trip to Washington, D.C., after which Walker stated that Alaska’s relationship to China “is almost a personal thing. The time we spent here with President Xi and Madame Peng was a very close experience. It is a really important relationship at this time between the state of Alaska and China and a great opportunity for both.” Walker visited China three times during his governorship, cutting various deals and signing various agreements.

In 2017, Walker had in hand a memorandum of understanding with China that included financing, building, and sales in a trade deal that would sell $1 trillion of natural gas to China over the next 100 years.

“I ran for office because I’m a hunter of opportunities for Alaska. The opportunity with China really fits into my passion and my goals for Alaska,” Walker said in 2018. “I’m looking forward to developing this incredible relationship.”

Gov. Dunleavy canceled all the deals when he came into office at the end of 2018.

Since leaving office, Walker has formed a new company to build a large-volume pipeline to export North Slope natural gas, trying to wrest control of the project from the Alaska Gas Development Corporation, the state-owned entity in charge of the gasline development.

As for Sinopec, according to Barron’s publication, there has been a long-running dispute with the U.S. stock exchanges over the auditing of Chinese companies, “with China pushing back on external regulators examining audits of local firms.”

The communist Chinese cited national security and confidentiality concerns over the independent audits. In 2021, the Securities and Exchange Commission finalized rules stating that foreign companies trading on U.S. exchanges would be required to submit financial statements with their filings, and those reports had to be compliant with U.S. accounting standards. Some Chinese companies refused to do this and are now voluntarily de-listing rather than see their companies forced off the exchanges.

The Holding Foreign Companies Accountable Act was passed by Congress in 2020, after Chinese regulators repeatedly denied requests from the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board to inspect the audits of Chinese firms that list and trade in the United States, according to a story at CNBC. The board was created in 2002 to oversee the audits of public companies, including foreign companies trading on the U.S. exchanges.

Sixteen Thirty Fund is the dark money scaring Alaskans into voting against their constitutional convention

Dark-money political group Sixteen Thirty Fund, an arm of Arabella Advisors, are active in Alaska elections again. This year, it will be Ballot Measure 1 they will try to defeat.

Ballot Measure 1 on the November general election ballot asks voters if they are ready for a constitutional convention to make adjustments to Alaska’s Constitution that the people feel are appropriate. Constitutional convention ballot questions come up every 10 years, and Alaskans have always voted them down.

But after former Gov. Bill Walker destroyed the Alaska Permanent Fund dividend calculation, which was in statute, lawmakers in Juneau have fought over the dividend for months on end every year.

Some would like the calculation of the PFD to be set into the Alaska Constitution and out of the hands of legislators. That could be done through a constitutional convention. Alaskans could also reform how judges are appointed; right now, the Alaska Bar Association has near total control of that process, which has led to an activist judiciary branch.

The leftists and their lawyers of Alaska, after working for over a year to fight a constitutional convention, created “Defend Our Constitution” to scare Alaskans. The top three funders of Defend Our Constitution are the Sixteen Thirty Fund, the National Education Association, and IBEW-Alaska’s political action committee.

“A single, cryptically named entity that has served as a clearinghouse of undisclosed cash for the left, the Sixteen Thirty Fund, received mystery donations as large as $50 million and disseminated grants to more than 200 groups, while spending a total of $410 million in 2020 — more than the Democratic National Committee itself,” The New York Times reported in January.

Last year, the Sixteen Thirty Fund funned money to support Forrest Dunbar for mayor of Anchorage. It was one of many Democrats the group funded with contributions from a Swiss billionaire trying to sway American Elections.

A complaint filed by the Americans for Public Trust said that a $35,000 contribution to a Dunbar-boosting group called “Building a Stronger Anchorage,” was financed with foreign money.

According to Defend Our Constitution, “We don’t want special interests to remake Alaska’s constitution for their own gain. Alaskans across the spectrum are committed to defending our document and keeping it in the best interests of Alaskans. In 1955, dedicated public servants came together to draft Alaska’s state constitution. The document they produced is renown for its thoroughness, protection of individual liberties, and functionality. It’s worked for the last 50 years and been held up as a model to other states, so let’s not let politicians scapegoat our constitution for their dysfunction.”

In reality, the group is made up of special interests instructing Alaskans to vote against the convention, and thus in favor of groups such as the NEA, which stand to gain every dollar taken from Alaskans’ Permanent Fund dividends.

Calling a constitutional convention would open a Pandora’s box,” the group writes on its website. “Calling a constitutional convention would create political chaos, cost millions of dollars, and create negative consequences for Alaskans. If dark money special interest from the Lower 48 were allowed to re-write our founding document, they’d change it to benefit themselves. Our founding document has served us well for over 50 years. If it needs to be amended, there’s a way to do that – and we’ve done it before. Calling a constitutional convention is unnecessary and will create a host of problems for Alaskans for years to come.”

Part of the Sixteen Thirty Fund web of influence

Even Alaska’s biggest political news organization, the Alaska Beacon, is part of an organization founded and originally funded through the same umbrella Arabella Group.

“The nonprofit watchdog OpenSecrets (published by the Center for Responsive Politics) reported in May 2020 on Arabella’s involvement in numerous “fake news sites,” pouring millions of untraceable dollars into advertisements and other digital content “masquerading as news coverage to influence the 2020 election,” wrote InfluenceWatch.

“OpenSecrets identified five Facebook pages (Colorado Chronicle, Daily CO, Nevada News Now, Silver State Sentinel, Verified Virginia) that “gave the impression of multiple free-standing local news outlets,” but are in fact “merely fictitious names used by the Sixteen Thirty Fund,” Arabella’s 501(c)(4) lobbying nonprofit. These pages published Facebook political advertisements that favored Democrats and left-wing causes during the 2020 election. After the report was published a number of these pages were deleted,” InfluenceWatch reported.

States Newsroom, which runs another network of left-wing “fake news” websites, was originally created as “Newsroom Network,” a project of the Arabella-run 501(c)(3) Hopewell Fund,” InfluenceWatch wrote.

“In June 2019, States Newsroom was spun off as an independent nonprofit with its own 501(c)(3) tax-exempt status, but a number of its local affiliates are used by the Hopewell Fund as its own legal aliases,” InfluenceWatch wrote.

According to the New York Times in January, the largest left-leaning non-profits funneling money to Democrats are:

ORGANIZATIONSPENDING IN 2020
Total$1,725,759,799
Adjusted total*$1,513,291,420
Sixteen Thirty Fund$410,038,247
America Votes$250,000,000
Majority Forward$185,000,000
Future Forward USA Action$149,377,966
Hopewell Fund$127,636,237
The Voter Participation Center$100,315,874
Voter Registration Project$74,922,371
League of Conservation Voters Inc.$71,608,762
Priorities USA$70,959,898
Duty and Honor$58,617,637
Everytown for Gun Safety Action Fund Inc.$52,280,883
North Fund$48,780,510
Center for Voter Information$47,188,981
Planned Parenthood Action Fund Inc.$40,914,740
Defending Democracy Together$38,117,693

Alaskans don’t yet know how much the Sixteen Thirty Fund is willing to spend to make sure Alaskans don’t approve a constitutional convention, but it will likely be in the millions.

The Sixteen Thirty Fund recently awarded Alaskans for Better Government, a group pushing a tribal sovereignty initiative onto the ballot, seed money of $250,000. But a law signed by Gov. Mike Dunleavy has removed that ballot initiative from consideration, since the state has now formally recognized tribes through statute. It was because of the funding from the Sixteen Thirty Fund, funneled through the liberal Anchorage-based campaign entity Ship Creek Group, that lawmakers took action and ensured the passage of the look-alike legislation in the Senate and House, thus avoiding a ballot measure that would drive liberals to the polls in November.

Report: TikTok tracks your keystrokes across external websites, could scrape sensitive data from users

The social media platform TikTok has code inside its app that allows the Chinese Communist Party-backed company to track users’ activity on external websites, according a report in Forbes magazine.

The author of the original report on the embedded code is a software engineer who found that TikTok can capture your credit card details, passwords, and other forms of personal information, and the choice to use the special lines of code was purposeful.

“This was an active choice the company made, said Felix Krause, who had also analyzed other popular iPhone applications that use in-app browsers, including Facebook, Facebook Messenger, Instagram, Snapchat, Amazon, and Robinhood. None of the other apps had the code that allowed companies to monitor a phone owner’s activities outside of the app itself.

Tracking keystrokes allows the app to gather all manner of sensitive information, including log-ins, passwords, and more.

“When TikTok users enter a website through a link on the app, TikTok inserts code that can monitor much of their activity on those outside websites, including their keystrokes and whatever they tap on the page, according to new research shared with Forbes. The tracking would make it possible for TikTok to capture a user’s credit card information or password,” according to Forbes. The way to avoid this happening is to not click on any websites from the TiokTok app, such as advertisements.

“This is a non-trivial engineering task. This does not happen by mistake or randomly,” Krause told writer Richard Nieva.

“Tiktok strongly pushed back at the idea that it’s tracking users in its in-app browser. The company confirmed those features exist in the code, but said TikTok is not using them,” Nieva wrote.

TikTok issued a statement, explaining that it does not use the code in the way Krause described: “Like other platforms, we use an in-app browser to provide an optimal user experience, but the Javascript code in question is used only for debugging, troubleshooting and performance monitoring of that experience — like checking how quickly a page loads or whether it crashes,” spokesperson Maureen Shanahan said.

Krause is founder of Fastlane, a service that tests and deploys apps. The company was acquired by Google several years ago.

The Forbes report is at this link.

Murkowski tattles on Tshibaka to FEC for not having ‘paid for’ disclaimer on latest ad

The Lisa Murkowski for U.S. Senate campaign announced today it notified the Alaska’s News Source, the Federal Election Commission and the Federal Communications Commission of a violation of federal communications law by Kelly Tshibaka’s campaign in a recent ad.

In the complaint, the Murkowski campaign cites Tshibaka’s omission of the legally required “paid-for” language as “the latest example of her blatant and repeated skirting of the law.”

In part, the letter reads:

“Tshibaka’s most recent advertisement, titled “Truth,” seeks to pollute an already-toxic political environment while evading responsibility for leveling these attacks at Senator Murkowski. Specifically, the advertisement fails to include any image of Tshibaka during the final four seconds of the advertisement, in violation of Federal law and in breach of her own certification under the law. These requirements of Federal law are not arbitrary nor are they left to the discretion of station managers: they are clear mandates requiring candidates to take responsibility for their negative advertising.”

Anyone may file an FEC complaint if they believe a regulation has been broken. The commission reviews every complaint filed. If the commission finds that a violation occurred, possible outcomes can range from a letter reiterating compliance obligations to a conciliation agreement, which may include a monetary civil penalty. All FEC enforcement matters are kept confidential until they are resolved, according to the FEC website.

But oftentimes candidates will use FEC violations as a way to attack their opponents, as Murkowski is doing in this case, trying to paint a picture that Tshibaka is a scofflaw regarding FEC rules, and pointing out that she also has a fishing violation on her record.

As for Tshibaka, her team had this to say about the Murkowski complaint: “First of all, we’ve never had ad on the air by that name – maybe they’re referring to the one accurately titled ‘Lisa Lies,’ which stopped running almost a week ago. But Murkowski clearly didn’t like the substance of that ad. Notice that she didn’t dispute that she claims to want lower gas prices but voted to confirm Joe Biden’s Interior Secretary who has declared war on Alaska’s energy industries and workers. Or that she criticizes special interests while her campaign is funded by dark money. Or that she’s lying to Alaskans trying to convince them that Kelly Tshibaka is against birth control pills when she’s not. Complaining about technicalities in a TV ad is the last refuge of losing campaigns. If you’re a 21-year incumbent and the best you can do is complain about ads, you’re in big trouble.”

Fauci heads for the exit as president’s medical adviser

Dr. Anthony Fauci, the nation’s top infectious disease official who was in charge of federal Covid-19 policy for President Donald Trump and President Joe Biden, will leave his job at the end of the year. Fauci, 81, said he would “pursue the next chapter of my career.” He will collect $350,000 a year in retirement benefits from the U.S. Treasury.

His departure as the president’s chief medical adviser and from the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases comes on the heels of Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Director Dr. Rochelle Walensky admitting that her agency made “some pretty dramatic public mistakes” handling the Covid-19, and saying the organization must “pivot” to restore the public trust. Some critics ay the organizational pivot should start with Walensky’s resignation.

When Covid-19 was declared a pandemic in March 2020, Fauci became a household name, widely regarded as the expert on Covid and related infectious illnesses. The media accepted his every word as truth, while those doctors and scientists with contrary opinions were dimissed as quacks and conspiracy theorists.

At one point, Fauci characterized himself as the infallible sole arbiter of scientific facts. He told MSNBC, “if you are trying to get at me as a public health official and a scientist, you’re really attacking not only Dr. Anthony Fauci, you’re attacking science.”

Before he told Americans they must wear masks, he was on record saying masks in public were useless, and the Covid virus was less concerning to him than influenza. He also dismissed any suggestion that the virus had escaped from the Wuhan Institute of Virology, (which had been funded by the NIAID, where he worked). Fauci told U.S. senators on the record that he wore a mask in public because it was protective, but later he told ABC News that he wore the mask as a signal, because since he was immunized, he has almost no chance of being infected by the virus. He has since contracted Covid not once but twice, even though fully vaccinated and boosted.

Another time, he provided an estimate on how long it would take for America to reach “herd immunity.” Then, he revised his estimate upward, based on polling data that showed more Americans would take the vaccine.

“Criticisms of Anthony S. Fauci, director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, are likewise rooted in misrepresentations he’s made about masks and in his often changing guidance, unleavened by any willingness to accept responsibility or acknowledge errors,” wrote columnist Hugh Hewitt in the Washington Post in January. Hewitt likened the mistrust Americans had developed for the medical establishment to the mistrust they had had of the Pentagon during the Vietnam War era.

“As McMaster demonstrates in his book, [Robert McNamara, President Johnson’s Defense secretary] maintained complete confidence in his own judgment and his commitment to continually escalating force against the Viet Cong and their patrons in Hanoi. Working with Maxwell Taylor, then the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, McNamara cut the Pentagon’s service chiefs off from Kennedy and then Johnson, and stacked every decision tree with carefully preselected acolytes. Johnson cared only for the politics of the situation, McNamara for his own vindication. But dissent didn’t vanish. It grew in an embittered senior military leadership and eventually broke into public view with publication of the Pentagon Papers. Public quiescence vanished slowly and, as costs escalated, the famous ‘credibility gap’ grew. Disaster awaited with collapse of support for the war and for South Vietnam.” Hewitt wrote.

“We have begun to see a similar deterioration of the public’s trust in public health and education authorities, and a deep, never-before-experienced suspicion of both the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and the Food and Drug Administration. Part of this is the result of misinformation and anti-vaccination points-of-view that unfortunately have taken deep root. I was a strong and early supporter of vaccines and boosters and remain convinced that the best means of persuading the ‘vaccine skeptical’ is engaging with them and calmly reviewing the evidence of effectiveness — not shaming, dismissiveness or caustic declamations.”

It was the the “Fauci as McNamara” comparison that Hewitt was making in his column. In January, a NBC poll asked respondents: “Do you trust what the Center for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) says?” 44 percent said yes; 43 percent said no.

“That’s a crisis of trust in public health authorities, a new ‘credibility gap,’ and it is itself a public health crisis,” said Hewitt.

Former Rep. Dean Westlake of Kotzebue dead, and police say it was homicide by his adult son

Dean Westlake, a legislator from Kotzebue who resigned under scandalous circumstances in 2017, has been killed. Police found him in a pool of blood, with signs he had been pummeled at a home in the 7500 block of Rovenna Street in Anchorage.

The suspect has been identified as his son, 36-year-old Tallon Westlake. After being interviewed by detectives, he was taken to the Anchorage Jail on charges of manslaughter and tampering with evidence. Now the incident is being investigated as a homicide, although cause of death must still be determined by the medical examiner.

Police said that because it is a domestic violence-related crime, they are not releasing the name of the victim, but it’s now known to be former Rep. Westlake.

At 6:51 am on Aug. 20, Anchorage Police Department and medics with the Anchorage Fire Department arrived at the Rovenna Street house to respond to a 911 call by Tallon about his father being dead in the house. Blood on the walls, blood on the floor, blood on the deceased, and blood on Tallon Westlake and his clothing led police to look at the situation as a crime scene. The floor was wet as though it has just been mopped and there was a mop in the bathtub. The washer was running, and there was a strong smell of bleach in the house.

Later, police learned from Dean Westlake’s girlfriend, who is currently out of state, that Dean was planning to evict Tallon from the house because he had not paid rent in four months. The girlfriend said Tallon was hooked on drugs.

Westlake first ran for the House in 2014 against Barrow Rep. Ben Nageak, who was a Democrat caucusing with the Republican-led majority. In 2016, Westlake ran again with the help of John-Henry Heckendorn and Ship Creek Group, Heckendorn’s start-up full-service campaign company that runs campaigns for Democrat candidates and liberal causes.

That year, the election worker in Shungnak allowed voters to cast two ballots — they could cast a Republican ballot so they could vote for Sen. Lisa Murkowski in the primary, and they could cast a Democrat ballot, so they could vote for the House position. There was a court challenge but the Alaska Supreme Court gave the win to Westlake, even with 50 improperly cast. ballots. Westlake was unopposed in the general election that year.

But the following year, women in the Alaska Capitol complained of his aggressive sexual overtures. He apologized publicly but soon information came out about an incident that happened when he was 28, when he got a 16-year-old girl pregnant.

Westlake resigned and Gov. Bill Walker chose John Lincoln to replace him and fill out the rest of his term. That seat is now represented by Josiah Patkotak of Utqiagvik (Barrow).

Meanwhile, a former staffer of his went public with her criticism of the Democratic Party for not taking such incidences seriously.

Jim Crawford: Case for a constitutional convention

By JIM CRAWFORD

Last Saturday I spent in Wasilla talking to forty or so pretty die-hard seniors about the  the next Alaska constitutional convention. Many were not convinced that the convention would actually happen.  I was a speaker along with Sen. Mike Shower, likely the most conservative member of the Alaska Senate. 

Combined, our purpose was to educate folks as to why a constitution convention was necessary.

The Legislature when it addresses constitutional matters must have a two-thirds super majority to pass a bill to add or delete provisions of the Constitution. If I were among those who think the Constitution is perfect, I would oppose the passage by voting no on the November ballot on Proposition #1. I did so for the last four decades. But this year I’m going to advocate and vote yes.

In preparation for the talk, I reread the Alaska Constitution from the first word to the last word. I noted those provisions which could require some amendment and here they are:   

Article I – Declaration of Rights

§ 22. Right of Privacy
§ 22. Right of Privacy

The right of the people to privacy is recognized and shall not be infringed. The legislature shall implement this section. [Amended 1972]

Article IV – The Judiciary

§ 8. Judicial Council

The judicial council shall consist of seven members. Three attorney members shall be appointed for six-year terms by the governing body of the organized state bar. Three non-attorney members shall be appointed for six-year terms by the governor subject to confirmation by a majority of the members of the legislature in joint session. Vacancies shall be filled for the unexpired term in like manner. Appointments shall be made with due consideration to area representation and without regard to political affiliation. The chief justice of the supreme court shall be ex-officio the seventh member and chairman of the judicial council. No member of the judicial council, except the chief justice, may hold any other office or position of profit under the United States or the State. The judicial council shall act by concurrence of four or more members and according to rules which it adopts.

Article VII – Health, Education and Welfare

§ 1. Public Education Public Education

The legislature shall by general law establish and maintain a system of public schools open to all children of the State and may provide for other public educational institutions. Schools and institutions so established shall be free from sectarian control. No money shall be paid from public funds for the direct benefit of any religious or other private educational institution.

Article VIII – Natural Resources

§ 1. Statement of Policy

It is the policy of the State to encourage the settlement of its land and the development of its resources by making them available for maximum use consistent with the public interest.


§ 2. General Authority

The legislature shall provide for the utilization, development, and conservation of all natural resources belonging to the State, including land and waters, for the maximum benefit of its people.


§ 3. Common Use

Wherever occurring in their natural state, fish, wildlife, and waters are reserved to the people for common use.

Article IX – Finance and Taxation

§ 7. Dedicated Funds

The proceeds of any state tax or license shall not be dedicated to any special purpose, except as provided in section 15 of this article or when required by the federal government for state participation in federal programs. This provision shall not prohibit the continuance of any dedication for special purposes existing upon the date of ratification of this section by the people of Alaska. [Amended 1976]

§ 13. Expenditures

No money shall be withdrawn from the treasury except in accordance with appropriations made by law. No obligation for the payment of money shall be incurred except as authorized by law. Unobligated appropriations outstanding at the end of the period of time specified by law shall be void.

§ 15. Alaska Permanent Fund

At least twenty-five per cent of all mineral lease rentals, royalties, royalty sale proceeds, federal mineral revenue sharing payments and bonuses received by the State shall be placed in a permanent fund, the principal of which shall be used only for those income-producing investments specifically designated by law as eligible for permanent fund investments. All income from the permanent fund shall be deposited in the general fund unless otherwise provided by law. [Amended 1976]

§ 16. Appropriation Limit

Except for appropriations for Alaska permanent fund dividends, appropriations of revenue bond proceeds, appropriations required to pay the principal and interest on general obligation bonds, and appropriations of money received from a non-State source in trust for a specific purpose, including revenues of a public enterprise or public corporation of the State that issues revenue bonds, appropriations from the treasury made for a fiscal year shall not exceed $2,500,000,000 by more than the cumulative change, derived from federal indices as prescribed by law, in population and inflation since July 1, 1981. Within this limit, at least one-third shall be reserved for capital projects and loan appropriations. The legislature may exceed this limit in bills for appropriations to the Alaska permanent fund and in bills for appropriations for capital projects, whether of bond proceeds or otherwise, if each bill is approved by the governor, or passed by affirmative vote of three-fourths of the membership of the legislature over a veto or item veto, or becomes law without signature, and is also approved by the voters as prescribed by law. Each bill for appropriations for capital projects in excess of the limit shall be confined to capital projects of the same type, and the voters shall, as provided by law, be informed of the cost of operations and maintenance of the capital projects. No other appropriation in excess of this limit may be made except to meet a state of disaster declared by the governor as prescribed by law. The governor shall cause any unexpended and unappropriated balance to be invested so as to yield competitive market rates to the treasury. [Amended 1982]

Rather than have a debate based upon fear of consequences of change, let’s debate and cost out each of the sections.  According to the rules we will operate under, each provisional change will require the positive vote of 50% + 1 to pass the convention delegates.  After that passage, all the voters of Alaska will then have to vote in a majority to pass the amendment.  

My list is a beginning, not an end.  Others may want other changes.  I trust Alaska voters to know the right from the wrong.  What I’ve heard from Alaska voters for decades, is that Alaskans want less government in their lives.  Here’s your chance.  When special interests replace the will of the people, the people must react and correct those errors.

The Constitutional Convention gives each of us the opportunity to bring the operations of government back to its Constitutional mandate.  As stated in Section Two of the current Constitution “Source of Government – all political power is inherent in the people.  All government originates with the people, is found upon their will only, and is instituted solely for the good of the people as a whole.”   

If you want to understand if we need a convention, just look at one example, the Alaska Permanent Fund. Legislators made a futile quests for a solution to the dividend. Each failed. 80% of Alaskans, as owners, want the dividend protected and calculated under the existing statute: earnings averaged over five years divided by the number of Alaskans who qualify. Instead, convention opponents, led by former Sen. Cathy Giessel, Rep. Bryce Edgmon and former Gov. Bill Walker espouse the special interests mantra “whatever is left over is what the people get for their dividend.”  

The only way to beat the special interests and take back the power for the people is to pass a constitutional amendment to give Constitutional protection the people deserve.

Let’s let the great debate begin.

Jim Crawford is the former President of Permanent Fund Defenders, pfdak.com, an Alaska based educational nonprofit corporation.  Jim is a third generation, lifelong Alaskan who co-chaired the Alaskans Just Say No campaign to stop the raid on the Permanent Fund in 1999.  He also served Governor Hammond as a member of the Investment Advisory Committee which formed the investment and corporate strategy of the Alaska Permanent Fund Corporation in 1975.