Saturday, July 26, 2025
Home Blog Page 71

Voice of Arctic Iñupiat opposes Democrats’ attempt to restrict activity in ANWR

SEN. DAN SULLIVAN RIPS OF COPY OF BILL

The Voice of the Arctic Iñupiat (VOICE), a coalition representing the majority of North Slope local governments, Alaska Native corporations, tribal non-profits, and federally recognized tribes, has announced its opposition to a new congressional proposal seeking to restrict activity in the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge (ANWR).

The legislation, introduced by California Democrat Rep. Jared Huffman, who was an ally of former Rep. Mary Peltola, was met with firm condemnation from North Slope Iñupiat leaders, who say the bill was developed without their input. The co-sponsor in the Senate is Sen. Ed Markey of Massachusetts, who has never visited the Arctic communities but has repeatedly signed on to legislation that impacts the people of the Arctic.

The legislation would limit development and access within ANWR’s 19-million-acre expanse, including the Coastal Plain, a region that is culturally vital to the Iñupiat people of Kaktovik, the only community that is actually located within the refuge’s boundaries.

In Washington, DC today, Sen. Dan Sullivan, while meeting with a group of Alaskans, took a copy of the bill and ripped it up to show his disapproval of the legislation that would harm Alaska Native communities.

“It is deeply concerning that, once again, legislators in Washington are attempting to advance policy to interfere with Kaktovik’s future, without any opportunity for our people to engage in the process,” said Charles Lampe, President of the Kaktovik Iñupiat Corporation.

Mayor Nathan Gordon, Jr. of the City of Kaktovik also voiced strong opposition to the bill, calling it a “misguided attempt by outsiders to regulate our homelands” without local consultation.

The North Slope Borough, which encompasses ANWR’s Coastal Plain, was established to allow local communities to benefit from and guide regional development.

The Borough’s tax base, composed almost entirely of infrastructure development, funds essential services including schools, healthcare, water and sewer systems, and wildlife management.

These services have had measurable impacts: In 1969, the average life expectancy for residents was 34 years.

Today, the lifespan of residents has more than doubled to 77 years, an increase VOICE points out is the largest of its kind in the US during that time span.

VOICE President Nagruk Harcharek criticized the lack of consultation in the bill’s development and expressed frustration with what he sees as selective support for Indigenous voices. “These individuals are beholden to so-called progressive organizations, the lot of whom only care about the Indigenous perspective when it is aligned with their policy priorities,” he said. “As stated by the 2023 Arctic Peoples Conference, ‘climate change cannot be an excuse to infringe on our distinct rights as Indigenous Peoples.’ As such, we overwhelmingly reject Representative Huffman and Senator Markey’s bill.” 

The opposition signals a deepening divide between Democrats and Indigenous communities regarding land use and self-determination in the Arctic. Huffman and Peltola worked closely together during her two years on office.

Poll on polls: Majority of Americans think media-sponsored polls are weaponized

A growing number of American voters are expressing deep skepticism toward public opinion polls following the 2024 presidential election, according to a new Rasmussen Reports national survey. The poll shows that just 10% of likely US voters say they have “a lot” of trust in polls sponsored by major media outlets, while more than half say they have little to no trust in them.

The findings come in the wake of widespread polling failures ahead of the 2024 election, where most major polls projected a win for Democrat Kamala Harris. In contrast, Rasmussen Reports stood out as one of the few pollsters to correctly predict a victory for Republican Donald Trump.

The survey, conducted over three days last week among 1,083 likely voters via telephone and online interviews, asked three questions relating to trust in media-sponsored polling and the perceived motivations behind inaccurate predictions.

When asked how much trust they have in polls from TV networks and other major media organizations, 34% of respondents said they had “not very much” trust, and 17% said they had “no trust at all.” Another 33% indicated they had “some” trust, while only 10% expressed high confidence in such polls.

The survey also probed deeper into public skepticism, with 59% of respondents saying it is at least somewhat likely that many public pollsters adjust their results to fit media political narratives. A significant portion believes these polls may have been used to influence public perception rather than reflect it.

In a particularly pointed question, voters were asked which scenario they found more believable: That some pollsters were deliberately adjusting their numbers to support Kamala Harris, or that most pollsters simply lack the ability to accurately predict elections.

A plurality agreed with the former, suggesting a widespread perception that polling may have been weaponized for political ends during the campaign.

The Harris campaign, after the election, acknowledged that their internal data never showed her leading Trump, contradicting public polling that frequently put her ahead. This discrepancy has only fueled voter suspicion and eroded trust in the polling industry.

With the 2024 election still fresh in voters’ minds, these numbers signal a credibility crisis for mainstream pollsters.

Rasmussen Reports voters if they think the checks and balances of the US Constitution are still working. In the responses, nearly 75% of Democrats said they believe President Donald Trump is a “fascist” dictator. 

Heads up: What you need to know about May Day protests planned for Alaska this week

Partisan protests are ahead for this week in Alaska and across the nation.

Alaska’s socialists, progressives, never-Trumpers, and Democrats will be part of the nationwide wave of May Day demonstrations, repurposing the traditional socialist labor holiday into another in the series that have taken place in opposition to the Trump White House.

Organized under the banners such the “50501” and “Hands Off!” movements, the rallies are part of a broader national mobilization involving over 150 progressive, labor, and civil rights organizations.​

For those traveling to Seattle or other major cities in the Lower 48, be aware that freeways may be blocked and traffic in town centers to be impeded, as the May Day protests may be the biggest yet in the series that started immediately after Donald Trump was sworn in. Owners of Tesla vehicles may want to garage them for the day to avoid vandalism.

In Alaska, events are scheduled in multiple communities, including Anchorage, Fairbanks, Sitka, Valdez, Skagway, Haines, Wasilla, Talkeetna, Girdwood, and Gustavus. 

Most of these gatherings are set to take place Thursday and feature marches, chanting, speeches, and the same kinds of cardboard signs used in recent weeks that call for the impeachment and imprisonment of Trump, calling for the removal of Elon Musk from his role in creating more government efficiency. And protesters will stand up for waste, fraud and abuse by the government.

The “50501” movement, named for “50 protests, 50 states, one movement,” has been coordinating many of these efforts. In Anchorage, the Party for Socialism and Liberation is among the local groups spearheading the May Day events. Their outreach emphasizes opposition to what they describe as the administration’s “far-right billionaire agenda.

In Alaska, there are events planned in these communities (not a comprehensive list):

Fairbanks, 5 pm, May 1, Veterans Memorial Park, 700 Cushman St,

Wasilla, 5:30 pm, May 1, Newcomb Park Wasilla Lake , 891 E Parks Highway

Juneau, 5 – 6:30 pm, May 1, in front of State Capitol

Sitka, 12 pm, May 1, Crescent Harbor Net Shed, 330 Harbor Dr.

Gustavus, 2 pm Saturday, May 3

Skagway, 5:30 pm, May 1, Centennial Park

Petersburg, 12-1 pm, May 1, Bushmann Park, Main Street

Haines, 12 pm, May 1, Third and Main St.

Valdez, 5 pm, May 1, State Court Building

Girdwood, 2 pm, May 1, Alyeska Highway & Hightower Road Intersection

Anchorage, 5 pm May 1, Delaney Park Strip, W 9th Ave.

5:30 pm, May 1, Talkeetna Village Park, East Main Street & Talkeetna Spur Road

Trump signs order taking action against ‘sanctuary’ jurisdictions. What does it mean for the Anchorage School District?

President Donald Trump signed a new executive order: “Protecting American Communities from Criminal Aliens.” He directed federal agencies to identify and take action against state and local jurisdictions that obstruct federal immigration enforcement. 

In Alaska, the Anchorage School District has implemented policies that may come under federal review due to the new executive order. 

The executive order directs the Departments of Justice and Homeland Security to publish a list of such “sanctuary” jurisdictions and to consider withholding federal funding from them. ​

The Trump Administration’s stance is that sanctuary policies, in which local governments limit cooperation with federal immigration authorities, pose a threat to national security and public safety. These jurisdictions may be violating federal laws, including those related to obstruction of justice and harboring unauthorized immigrants. 

While Anchorage is not officially designated as a sanctuary city, it does have aspects of one, using different language adopted during the Ethan Berkowitz Administration, whereby “Welcoming” replaced “Sanctuary” to avoid the legal consequences during the first Trump Administration.

The Anchorage School District, however, has declared its schools as off-limits to federal immigration officers. Superintendent Jharrett Bryantt stated that the district requires immigration officials to present a judicially signed warrant before entering school property and that such warrants will be reviewed by the district’s legal counsel to ensure they meet legal standards. The superintendent did not specify how long such legal review would take. This would give him time to ensure that any illegal alien on school grounds has a chance to escape before authorities could enter a campus.

ASD’s policies rely on Bryantt’s unique interpretation the federal Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act (FERPA), which protects student privacy by prohibiting the sharing of student-specific information without parental consent, except in specific legal situations. The district has a varying interpretation of this act but it maintains that it is complying with all applicable laws.

The executive order is expected to face legal challenges, as have previous attempts by the Trump administration to withhold federal funding from sanctuary jurisdictions.

In 2018, the 9th US Circuit Court of Appeals ruled that such actions exceeded presidential authority, emphasizing that only Congress has the power to control federal spending. 

A full list of sanctuary cities and other jurisdictions can be seen at this link at the Center for Immigration Studies.

Small plane crashed in on Kenai Peninsula; two dead, one medevaced in critical condition

Update: Investigators say the accident was likely due to a dog on the runway, forcing the plane to abort the landing.

Alaska State Troopers are responding to a small plane crash near the south end of the Kenai Peninsula.

Two people perished and one is in critical condition. It appears from photos shared on social media that the plane, a small commercial commuter, crashed on the beach at about 2 pm.

The injured passenger has reportedly been medevaced to Anchorage.

On Tuesday morning, Gov. Mike Dunleavy released a statement that said the pilot, Dan Bunker, and passenger Jenny Miller were the two who died in the crash.

“The First Lady and I are heartbroken by the tragic plane crash near Nanwalek. We send our deepest condolences to the families of Daniel Bunker and Jenny Miller, and we’re praying for the recovery of the injured passenger,” he said.

Bunker is a well-known pilot and bear-viewing guide. A tribute to him can be seen here:

https://www.facebook.com/share/p/1DaCBC7DsP

Miller was a young professional photographer originally from Nome and a shareholder in Bering Straits Native Corp.

The crash site is near the Nanwalek, which is a hamlet formerly known as English Bay where there is a short gravel air strip. It is south of Homer, southwest of Seldovia and near Port Graham.

The plane was a regularly scheduled flight from Smokey Bay Air, which is a commercial air charter service out of Homer. The tail number of the plane is N91025, and the same plane crashed in Nanwalek in 2016, and was brought back into service.

Read about the previous crash at this link.

At AirNav.com, these conditions exist at Nanwalek:

Dimensions: 1850 x 50 ft. / 564 x 15 m
RY 01/19 N 1000 FT CLSD INDEFLY; RMNDR 850 FT SOFT.
Surface: gravel, in poor condition
RY SOFT, RUTS & 4 IN DIAM LOOSE ROCKS ON SFC.
RY SOFT AFTER HARD RAIN, RUTS AND LOOSE ROCKS ON SFC.
Runway edge markings: RYS 01 & 19 END & EDGES NOT MKD, DUE TO HIGH WINDS & WATER EROSION.
Operational restrictions: THE RY IS ARC SHAPED WITH A MAGNETIC HEADING OF 010 DEGS ON ONE END OF THE RY AND A HEADING OF 190 DEGS ON THE OTHER END OF THE RY. WIDTH CHANGES BTWN 75-80 FT LENGTH OF RY.

– BE ALERT DURING EASTERLY CROSSWINDS DUE TO STRONG DOWNDRAFTS AND GUSTY CONDITIONS.

– WX CAMERA AVBL ON INTERNET AT HTTPS://WEATHERCAMS.FAA.GOV

– RWY 01/19 NORTH 1000 FT CLOSED INDEF, ENTIRE RWY SFC SOFT WITH LOOSE GRVL.

– RWY 01/19 NORTH 1000 FT CLOSED INDEF, ENTIRE RWY SFC SOFT WITH LOOSE GRVL.

– RWY CONDITION NOT MONITORED, RECOMMEND VISUAL INSPECTION PRIOR TO USING.

– RY 19 APCH RSTRD BY VILLAGE ON HILLSIDE. RY 01 APCH RSTRD BY ABRUPT MOUNTAIN FACE .21 NM OFF RY END.

– LIMITED TNST ACFT PARKING FACILITY.

– DAY VFR ONLY.

– FREQUENT ALL TERRAIN VEH TRAFFIC ON RWY.

– TURBULENCE DUE TO VARIABLE WINDS AND CLOSE IN HIGH TERRAIN AT EACH END OF RUNWAY. NO OVER RUN AT END OF RWY 19.

The NTSB reported Tuesday that they have opened up an investigation. Aviators in the area said the weather was mild and did not appear to be a contributor to the crash.

Typical landing in Nanwalek:

Check back for updates.

Oopsie: Senate will have a do-over on education funding bill because, well, it’s unconstitutional

No sooner had the Senate passed House Bill 57, which suddenly added $184 million to school districts in Alaska, than the Senate asked the House to send the bill back. Someone spotted a provision in it, added by Sen. Rob Yundt of Wasilla, which was clearly unconstitutional.

Yundt had worked with Democrats Sen. Loki Tobin and Sen. Bill Wielechowski to pass an amendment that would provide some $23 million in reading grants. That amount used to be a rounding error in the state budget, but these days it’s a lot of money.

The way the amendment is worded makes the reading grants dependent upon passage of Senate Bill 113, by Sen. Wielechowski, which taxes businesses that are conducting internet sales in Alaska. Apparently, Yundt had made a deal with the Democrats to support that tax, and his amendment dedicated some of that expected revenue to the reading grants. That bill has passed the Senate but not yet passed the House.

That addition of dedicated funds made the bill unconstitutional.

During the “sausage-making” process that all bills and amendments go through, the constitutionality aspect was overlooked by the lawyers who work in Legislative Legal. Someone pointed it out to the Senate Majority after the vote had already been taken on Monday.

House Bill 57 has had a twisted life. It started out as a simple bill by Anchorage Democrat Rep. Zack Fields that would get school districts to ban the use of cell phones by students during school hours.

But then it became the mule for what is now about $200 million in more spending for education, and a hefty increase to the Base Student Allocation formula. Once the Senate got ahold of the bill, it became tarted up with all kinds of wants and desires, with no fiscal notes. Yundt fell into the trap and Democrats did him no favors.

During floor remarks on Monday, Sen. Yundt effusively praised the Democrats for helping him get his amendment passed. He noted that he is not an education expert, but more of someone who makes deals and looks for the “soft spots.”

“This is what teamwork looks like,” Yundt said, after thanking the Democrats for their cooperation.

The bill is now been bounced back to the Senate Rules Committee and will return to the floor on Wednesday for repair.

The fix may be that the word “shall” can be changed to “may,” in Yundt’s amendment, but if that happens it means there is no real funding source for the $23 million he wants, and that makes it unpalatable to many in a year where funds are scarce. The fiscal support for the amendment has all but collapsed.

Meanwhile, there’s another aspect to the bill that has constitutional questions and makes it vulnerable for a lawsuit on down the road.

HB 57 has a provision that mandates the Department of Labor and Workforce Development track Alaska high school graduates for 20 years to see what happens to them in their lives. There are no specific parameters to the tracking, which may involve their careers or may involve other things, such as personal data; it’s just a general tracking provision in law that keeps tabs on Alaskans until they turn 38 years old. Critics say this is a severe violation of the Alaska Constitution’s privacy provision.

Congressman Begich’s latest bill would ban ranked-choice voting in federal elections

Alaska Congressman Nick Begich knows all about ranked-choice voting. He’s been through the process twice — once in 2022 and again in 2024. He’s had to explain it countless times to thousands voters both in Alaska and Outside.

On Monday, Begich filed a bill to outlaw ranked-choice voting in federal elections. Cosponsoring the bill is Congressman Abraham Hamadeh of Arizona, a Republican.

The Preventing Ranked Choice Corruption Act is intended to protect the integrity of America’s elections by amending the Help America Vote Act, and reversing the growing voter confusion and disenfranchisement with emergent RCV systems, which vary from state to state and county to county where they are being used.

“The nation does not need more uncertainty and confusion injected into the federal election process,” said Congressman Begich. “One person, one vote’ is a proven, tried and true method that is easy to understand, easy to audit, and quick to report. Experiments with our national election systems risk disenfranchisement of voters and lead to outcomes that do not represent the true will of the American people.”

President Donald Trump has also expressed strong opposition to ranked-choice voting and has advocated for its ban. He called it a “fraudulent joke” and “one of the greatest threats to democracy” in posts on TruthSocial and during his Anchorage, Alaska rally in 2022 he criticized the complicated voting method that had just gone into effect.

So far, 14 states have banned ranked-choice voting statewide and another 11 are in the process of banning it.

Congressman Hamadeh emphasized the dangers Ranked Choice Voting poses to election integrity nationwide.

“The same Democrat pawns who support allowing non-citizen voting without voter ID and same-day voter registration also want to turn our Democracy into a rank choice voting scheme,” Hamadeh said. “Their motives are clear – they do not want to help Americans vote – they only want to help corrupt politicians win.”

Three states use RCV in statewide elections — Alaska, Hawaii, and Maine.

Alaska’s new Repeal Now group is circulating a petition to repeal the ranked-choice voting used in Alaska.

“In Alaska, ranked-choice voting has led to a delay and lack of transparency,” said Bernadette Wilson, one of the sponsors of Repeal Now. “It’s added to voter confusion and disenfranchisement. This is why we are actively collecting a new round of signatures to repeal this convoluted system in November of 2026.”

Wilson added, “We know voters were deceived and we feel confident they will vote yes to repeal this time.”

David Boyle: What about constitutional right of privacy for high school graduates?

By DAVID BOYLE

The state legislature is considering House Bill 57, a bill that raises the Base Student Allocation, restricts cell phone usage in schools, and tracks student graduates for 20 years following graduation. Here is the bill section on tracking students:

“The Department of Labor & Workforce Development shall (8) gather data on the progress of each high school graduating class in a district by collecting career, postsecondary education, and residency data on each student in the graduating class; the department shall gather the data required under this paragraph HB57 every five years for 20 years after the high school graduation date of each high school graduating class; the department shall publish a biennial report on the data gathered under this paragraph;” 

Supposedly, the intent of tracking students until they are 38 years old is to determine if our K-12 education system is successful late in life. Are they employed? Are they on welfare? Are they elected officials? Are they employed by the government or private sector? Are they incarcerated? Are they still in Alaska? Are they lobbyists?  Are they nonprofit CEOs?

How will they track these graduates? Will they implant chips in the students?  Will they require the student graduates to inform the State of Alaska whenever they change jobs or move to another state?

This legislation would appear to fly in the face of the Alaska Constitution’s Right to Privacy clause. Alaska Constitution, Article I, section 22 says:

§ 1.22 – Right of Privacy

“The right of the people to privacy is recognized and shall not be infringed.”

Apparently, the Senate believes that Alaska’s Right to Privacy does not apply to high school graduates.

Sen. Shelley Hughes (R-Palmer) offered an amendment to change the student graduate tracking from 20 years to the more recent 3 years. That amendment was defeated 14-6.

Those who voted to track students for 20 years: Senators, Stevens, Giessel, Bjorkman, Claman, Dunbar, Gray-Jackson, Hoffman, Kawasaki, Kiehl, Merrick, Olson, Stedman, Tobin, and Wielechowski.

Sen. Jesse Kiehl (D-Juneau) stated that three years alone would not give future legislators the needed information.

Sen. Robert Myers (R-North Pole) asked what do we do with the data we collect now. Do we do anything with the data we already have?  He went on to say, “If a 38-year-old person is not doing well, I have to figure out if it’s actually the school that caused that”.  

It’s a little late to determine a causal relationship after 38 years.

Sen. Matt Claman (D-Anchorage) tried to compare collecting 20 years of data of a high school graduate to 5 years of victimization data that is collected. He said that the collection of this student data would help show the legislature and K-12 system how well they are doing.

Sen. Mike Shower (R-Wasilla) supported the amendment and had serious concerns about protecting the collected data. He said there is no way we can protect the information we already have as has been shown by hacks to the state’s data.  He said, “The more we get the more we cannot protect.”  “The easiest way to protect it is to not collect it.”

There was really no mention of the Alaska Constitution Right to Privacy clause.

Maybe we should collect 20 years of data on legislators following their initial election. That way we may be able to determine the causal relationship of their votes.

Will we see high school graduates marching across the stage to get their diploma while being implanted with a chip? 

David Boyle is an education writer for Must Read Alaska.

Alaska graduate surveillance legislation passes Senate under guise of ‘cell phones in schools’

An Alaska House of Representatives bill that was originally about cell phone use in schools has passed the Senate after being decorated with numerous amendments having nothing to do with cell phones.

One of those amendments to House Bill 57 has the State of Alaska tracking Alaska high school graduates for 20 years — until they are 38 years old.

That amendment came from the Senate Finance Committee last week. For many Alaskans, it means the State of Alaska will be tracking them and collecting data on them for half of their natural lives.

Sen. Jesse Kiehl reassured the Senate that the information would be kept strictly confidential, a claim that was disputed by Sen. Mike Shower, who said data leaks happen all the time and with greater frequency; it wasn’t that long ago that election files were hacked and the state had to issue credit repair benefits to thousands of Alaskans.

Sen. Shelley Hughes, a Republican from the Mat-Su, tried to reduce that tracking of Alaskans to three years, out of concern for people’s privacy, but the Democrat-led majority voted her idea down.

Here’s how the vote went on Hughes’ amendment to reduce the amount of data-gathering that the state would conduct on its citizens:

Amendment No. 8 failed; it would have limited the data collection of Alaska high school graduates to three years.

Nearly all the amendments offered by Republicans on Monday to improve the bill were rejected.

In addition to monitoring Alaskans for 20 years after high school, the bill adds about $184 million in funding for schools, including an additional $700 per student to the Base Student Allocation.

The Base Student Allocation additional funding would become an ongoing expense into future years, locking legislatures into an automatic increase.

Senate Education Committee Chairwoman Loki Tobin said that it’s not the entire answer for the funding needs, and indicated that the Democrats will be back for more next year.

The bill also expands, ever so slightly, the ability of charter schools to get approved by local school boards.

The bill will now return to the House for concurrence.