Home Blog Page 651

‘Robert L. Peters’ Biden may have used secret name as vice president

Guest Writer
-
22
‘Robert L. Peters’ Biden may have used secret name as vice president

By PHILIP WEGMANN

While vice president of the United States, Joe Biden allegedly used an alternate email account, and now, House Republicans want to read all his old messages.

Rep. James Comer, chairman of the House Oversight Committee, requested Thursday that the National Archives and Records Administration turn over a tranche of emails from President Biden’s time as vice president.

More specifically, Comer wants “all unredacted documents and communications” to and from the then-vice president and his son, Hunter Biden, and his son’s business associates.

Republicans have been scouring records for months as part of their investigation of Hunter Biden.

The newest wrinkle: a pseudonym that the vice president used to set up an obscure but official government email account, a practice not uncommon among cabinet secretaries at the time.

Biden went by “Robert L. Peters” and, as vice president, could be reached at “[email protected].”

“Joe Biden has stated there was ‘an absolute wall’ between his family’s foreign business schemes and his duties as Vice President, but evidence reveals that access was wide open for his family’s influence peddling,” Comer said in a statement.

The records request to the Archives comes after the Department of Justice appointed a special counsel to investigate Hunter Biden when a plea deal between the government and the president’s son, stemming from two misdemeanor tax charges and a felony gun possession charge, fell apart. Republicans have long argued that the Biden family leveraged their political connections for personal gain and sought to connect the president directly to his son’s business dealings.

White House officials, meanwhile, deny any wrongdoing on the president’s behalf. The administration has alternately said that the president “never discussed” business and was “never in business” with his son.

But the emails House Republicans want completely unredacted show, at a bare minimum, that Vice President Biden’s team looped Hunter Biden into his official schedule, and they point to two emails sent on May 26, 2016, and June 14, 2016.

The May email cited by Comer in his letter was sent by John Flynn, a personal assistant to the vice president, and included a rundown of that day’s schedule. It details how Biden was to call then-Ukrainian President Petro Poroshenko at 9 a.m. before traveling to Rhode Island in the afternoon and eventually returning to the “Lake House” in Delaware.

Hunter Biden was copied on that email via an address associated with his consulting firm Rosemont Seneca. He was also present at an event that weekend with the rest of the Biden family as they gathered in Delaware to commemorate the one-year anniversary of the passing of Beau Biden.

Hunter Biden was also copied on the second email from June, which included a rundown of the vice president’s schedule for then-Ukrainian Prime Minister Volodymyr Groysman’s visit to the White House.

The president’s son served on the board of Ukrainian energy company Burisma Holdings from 2014 until 2019, earning a monthly salary of $83,000 despite having no experience in the natural gas industry. Republicans have noted this fact and pointed to a now infamous clip from December 2015 of Biden bragging about threatening to withhold billions in U.S. aid to Ukraine unless a prosecutor investigating Burisma was removed.

“I looked at them and said: I’m leaving in six hours. If the prosecutor is not fired, you’re not getting the money,” Biden later recalled of his conversations with the Poroshenko government. “Well, son of a bitch. He got fired.”

The prosecutor, Viktor Shokin, was removed at the end of March 2016, two months before Biden’s call with the Ukrainian president, according to the emailed schedule.

Redacted versions of those emails were previously released under the Freedom of Information Act, and  Archives made them publicly available. They are cataloged online under the subhead, “Email Messages To and/or From Vice President Biden and Hunter Biden related to Burisma and Ukraine.” They correspond with emails contained on the laptop which the president’s son abandoned at a repair shop.

The only redaction: Archives appears to have omitted the phone number of Biden’s personal aide. The messages still, however, raise questions about why the president’s son, whom the White House refers to as “a private citizen,” was looped into an hour-by-hour official White House schedule.

Comer has also requested that Archives turn over “any document or communication” which included Hunter Biden or his business associates Eric Schwerin or Devon Archer.

Schwerin previously testified before the House Oversight Committee that he “was not aware” of any involvement by then-Vice President Biden in “the financial conduct” of his son’s business. Archer also testified that he was similarly unaware of any conversations between the vice president and his son.

Archer also testified that Hunter Biden had put his father on speakerphone as many as 20 times during meetings with business associates and that the former vice president met with a Chinese business associate of his son for coffee in Beijing.

Republicans believe that during his time as vice president, Biden used at least three pseudonyms, including Robert Peters, Robin Ware, and JRB Ware, revelations first reported by the New York Post. They are expected to pull at that string in the coming weeks and months. Comer has already requested that Archives turn over any documentation associated with those names as well.

The Associated Press reported that Obama administration officials were in the habit of using “secret government email accounts” to keep their inboxes from overflowing with spam. Then-White House Press Secretary Jay Carney dismissed that characterization at the time, noting that even when officials used pseudonyms, their email correspondence was still archived.

“There’s nothing secret,” Carney said. “It’s about having a public email address, as well as one for internal, you know, workings. But they’re all available for when FOIA requests are made and congressional inquiries are conducted.”

This article was originally published by RealClearPolitics and made available via RealClearWire.

Chilling effect on election observers created as Anchorage Ombudsman refers questions to Department of Law

Suzanne Downing
-
29
Chilling effect on election observers created as Anchorage Ombudsman refers questions to Department of Law

The Anchorage Office of the Ombudsman has officially referred the results of an investigation into the involvement of the city’s Office of Information Technology (OIT) director, Marc Dahl, during a challenge to the April 4 municipal election to the state Department of Law.

Ombudsman Darrel Hess, a liberal partisan who works for the Anchorage Assembly, stated that he “reasonably believes that there may have been a violation of state election statutes” and is recommending that Mayor Dave Bronson terminate Dahl from his position. Dahl has been on administrative leave for several weeks.

This action by the ombudsman, who has shown strong bias against the mayor, could create a chilling effect on anyone who would sign up to be an election observer in the future. Election observers are the only way a citizen can lodge an election complaint, but lodging a complaint now appears to put citizens in peril of a legal claim against them by the Anchorage Assembly or its surrogate, the ombudsman.

The investigation centers around events that unfolded on April 11, when Dahl instructed his IT staff to publish an internal security policy related to USB (thumb) drives being inserted into the city’s intranet’s IT security web page. The thumb drives were not being checked to ensure they were not transferring data to the election equipment, and Dahl wanted to tighten up that procedure.

The new policy, developed during the election, was emailed to election observer Sami Graham. Graham and two other observers cited the content of this policy in a formal challenge to the city’s municipal election, which had occurred on April 4. Hess is concluding that Graham and other challengers were coordinating with Dahl.

Graham and the other observers wanted to ensure that people inserting thumb drives into election equipment were being supervised or that their actions were being witnessed by another employee.

The complaint against the election observers that triggered the investigation was lodged on April 26, following an April 20 public session of the Anchorage Election Commission’s canvass and adoption of the election canvass report.

The complainant expressed concerns about the Anchorage OIT director’s potential role in developing and posting the USB policy with the intent of supporting an election observer’s challenge to the municipal election.

After reviewing documents and conducting interviews with various stakeholders, including Office of Information Technology staff and former staff, the Ombudsman concluded that a longstanding internal thumb drive policy had existed for several years. This policy required OIT staff to scan USB drives before inserting them into Municipal of Anchorage equipment. This policy was solely an internal OIT policy and did not have MOA-wide applicability.

Mayor Rick Mystrom’s MOA Policy & Procedure 1-1, signed on April 8, 1997, mandates a collaborative process involving all department directors, department policy coordinators, and the Office of Management & Budget for the development of policies with Muni-wide applications. The finalized, signed document with an assigned P&P number is supposed to be shared with MOA employees. The investigation revealed that the development and posting of the Office of Information Technology USB policy on April 11 did not adhere to these requirements.

The Ombudsman reported that the OMB Director was unaware of the policy’s existence until contacted by the Ombudsman, and the OIT Chief Information Security Officer confirmed that the posted policy was solely an internal OIT policy and did not hold MOA-wide authority.

The referral of the investigation’s results to the state Office of Special Prosecutions and the recommendation for Mayor Bronson to terminate Marc Dahl’s position mark a turning point in this case that may impact the actions and the public’s confidence of future elections.

Tennessee couple found safe after hiking away from Chena Hot Springs

Suzanne Downing
-
19
Tennessee couple found safe after hiking away from Chena Hot Springs

A Tennessee couple who were reported missing while hiking near Chena Hot Springs were found safe Friday evening.

Jonas Bare, 50 and Cynthia Hovsepian, 37, had left their possessions in their lodging in Fairbanks but failed to check out on Aug. 12. They also failed to make their return flight from Alaska and had not contacted family members. A search was launched by Alaska State Troopers and other rescue organizations, including PAWS rescue dogs.

On Friday evening, two hikers encountered Jonas Bare on a trail approximately 200 yards from Chena Hot Springs Resort.

The hikers brought Bare to the Alaska Wildlife Troopers search and rescue command post within the resort.

Bare was uninjured and told Troopers that he had left Hovesepian to seek help. Bare guided Troopers and rescuers to the general area where Hovesepian was located, which was approximately three miles from the resort.

Hovesepian was located by the search team after calling out for her.

Bare, Hovesepian, and the rescue teams returned to Chena Hot Springs Resort at 8:40 pm, and they were evaluated by medics.

Fidelity Charitable sued after it was caught banning conservative and faith-based nonprofits

Suzanne Downing
-
3
Fidelity Charitable sued after it was caught banning conservative and faith-based nonprofits

Fidelity Charitable, the country’s largest donor-advised fund, is deviating from its pledge to honor donors’ grant requests in a “cause-neutral” manner, according to a new lawsuit filed with Louisiana Attorney General Jeff Landry.

Dawn Manning, an account holder from Louisiana, joined forces with Alliance Defending Freedom attorneys to file the complaint, urging the state’s top law enforcement official to investigate discrimination against conservative nonprofit groups and violations of state consumer protection laws.

Alliance Defending Freedom is the group that defended the Anchorage Downtown Hope Center against a lawsuit by a male dressed as a woman who demanded entry into the women’s shelter. It has also defended a Colorado web designer who didn’t want to make a wedding page for a same-sex wedding.

Fidelity Charitable, which distributed over $11.2 billion in funds for individual donors last year, faces allegations that it is responding to pressure from left-wing organizations, including the Southern Poverty Law Center, the Amalgamated Foundation, and the “Unmasking Fidelity” initiative.

The Unmasking Fidelity coalition, based in Boston with national support, says it “is committed to challenging Fidelity Charitable’s role in funneling millions of dollars through Donor Advisor Funds to organizations that promote and further systemic oppression globally.”

The complaint from Manning says that Fidelity Charitable is hindering anonymous donations to religious and conservative groups, raising concerns about freedom of speech and philanthropic liberty and intent.

Unmasking Fidelity demands that Fidelity Charitable publicly disclose “past contributions to organizations perpetuating white supremacy and fascism.” The group says Fidelity must divest from what it describes as the “violence of white supremacy and fascism by developing a public screening policy.” And it says the charitable fund must redistribute the funds it has already given out. The groups that would get the funds must be “communities most impacted by white supremacist and fascist violence.“

In other words, the group wants to take over Fidelity Charitable and redistribute the funds that individual donors have entrusted to the organization.

Fidelity Charitable allows Americans to set up their own grant-making funds, similar to foundations, and support most qualified 501(c)(3) public charities. But Fidelity Charitable says that “Public charity status alone does not guarantee that a grant recommendation will be approved.” In other words, the company still has the final say.

“Politicizing our culture of giving is dangerous for people of all beliefs. Our freedoms travel together—including freedom of speech and philanthropic freedom,” remarked Alliance Defending Freedom Senior Counsel and Senior Vice President for Corporate Engagement Jeremy Tedesco. He highlighted the 2021 U.S. Supreme Court ruling in Thomas More Law Center v. Bonta, which affirmed the right to privacy in financial giving as part of the First Amendment’s “free association” promise.

The complaint asserts that Fidelity Charitable blocked Manning’s donations to Alliance Defending Freedom, Family Research Council, Center for Security Policy, and Pacific Justice Foundation—groups that have been targeted by “Unmasking Fidelity” and labeled as “hate groups” by SPLC.

However, Manning’s test donations to left-leaning organizations, such as Human Rights Campaign, CAIR Foundation, and Lambda Legal, were processed promptly.

Alliance Defending Freedom, which defended Downtown Hope Center, called hate group by senior Justice official

Documentation reveals that Fidelity Charitable has informed account holders in at least 12 states since 2019 that they cannot direct funds anonymously to ADF.

In the same year, “Unmasking Fidelity” began demanding public disclosure of five years’ worth of contributions to 10 specified organizations, including ADF, Family Research Council, and Center for Security Policy.

The initiative, relying on the widely discredited Southern Policy Law Center, has come under scrutiny for its inclusion of numerous parental-rights-in-education groups in its debunked “Hate Map.”

Unmasking Fidelity also seeks to impose a screening mechanism on Fidelity Charitable to restrict conservative and religious charities as donation options.

Despite public denials from Fidelity Charitable leadership, the complaint seems to indicate that the pressure exerted by the campaign is having an impact.

“Everyone should oppose this name-and-shame censorship,” emphasized ADF Legal Counsel Michael Ross. “Every American should be free to support causes they believe in without fear of harassment or intimidation. That’s why the anonymity provided by donor-advised funds like Fidelity Charitable is so important, and it’s why government officials like the Louisiana attorney general must ensure that people of faith are not treated as second-class citizens.”

Breaking: Supreme Court says web designer can’t be compelled to work on gay wedding project

Federalist Society luncheon: The Founders, money and the Constitution

Suzanne Downing
-
2
Federalist Society luncheon: The Founders, money and the Constitution

The Federalist Society Alaska Chapter announced that Grant Starrett, vice president of acquisitions at Lion Real Estate Group, will address the group’s next luncheon gathering on the topic of the Founders, money, the Constitution, and the size of government.

Amidst concerns over the highest inflation rates in decades, the event at the Petroleum Club in Anchorage at noon on Aug. 21 aims to provide a fresh perspective on how the Founders’ views on sound money were enshrined in the Constitution to explicitly limit the scope of government, and how these principles have been warped over time.

Starrett is the president of Nashville Lawyers Chapter of the Federalist Society. He graduated from Stanford University, where he founded its Conservative Society, and later earned his J.D. from Vanderbilt University Law School. During his time at Vanderbilt, he gained experience working for Sen. Jim DeMint (R-SC), further shaping his understanding of the dynamics between government, the Constitution, and economic principles.

Starrett’s analyses and writings have been featured in prominent national publications such as the Wall Street Journal, National Review, and The Federalist. His regular book reviews on GrantReadsBooks at Substack showcase his passion for intellectual discourse and exploration of ideas.

Tickets are $10 for members and $20 for nonmembers. Lunch is included. The event is open to the public.

The Federalist Society for Law and Public Policy Studies is made up of individuals with conservative and libertarian leanings who have a keen interest in the present condition of the legal system. The organization is established upon the core tenets that the primary purpose of the government is to safeguard individual freedoms, that the division of governmental powers is a fundamental aspect of our Constitution, and that the judiciary’s role is predominantly to interpret the law as it stands, rather than as it ought to be.

The group, active in states across the nation, aims to both raise awareness about these principles and advance their implementation through its various initiatives, which include speaker series.

Take that, Fox News: Tucker and Trump will take to Twitter during GOP presidential debate next week

Suzanne Downing
-
47
Take that, Fox News: Tucker and Trump will take to Twitter during GOP presidential debate next week

Donald Trump said weeks ago he would not attend the Fox News presidential debate on Aug. 23 in Milwaukee, Wisconsin.

On Friday he announced he will instead do an interview with former Fox News host Tucker Carlson. It will be live-streamed on X, the site formerly known as Twitter.

In other words, Trump may have just destroyed the Republican debate’s ratings, and Carlson gave Fox News the finger in the process.

Carlson was fired by Fox News earlier this year for his reporting on the Dominion Voting Systems scandals, which ended with a settlement between Fox and Dominion that totaled $787 million to close out the defamation lawsuit. After taking a brief vacation, Carlson has built a following of millions on Twitter, where he now does his interviews.

Trump wrote today, “As everyone is aware, my Poll numbers, over a ‘wonderful’ field of Republican candidates, are extraordinary. In fact, I am leading the runner up, whoever that may now be, by more than 50 Points. Reagan didn’t do it, and neither did others. People know my Record, one of the BEST EVER, so why would I Debate? I’M YOUR MAN.”

Although the announcement was reported by the New York Times, it was not reported by Fox News as of Must Read Alaska publication time.

On Nov. 2, 2020, Carlson wrote about why Americans love Donald Trump so much, in an endorsement of Trump that was published at Fox News:

“They love Donald Trump because no one else loves them. The country they built, the country their ancestors fought for over hundreds of years, has left them to die in unfashionable little towns, mocked and despised by the sneering halfwits with finance degrees — but no actual skills — who seem to run everything all of a sudden.

“Whatever Donald Trump’s faults, he is better than the rest of the people in charge. At least he doesn’t hate them for their weakness. Donald Trump, in other words, is and has always been a living indictment of the people who run this country. That was true four years ago when he came out of nowhere to win the presidency. And it’s every bit as true right now, maybe even more true than it’s ever been. It will remain true regardless of whether Donald Trump wins reelection.

“Trump rose because they failed. It’s as simple as that. If the people in charge had done a halfway decent job with the country they inherited, if they cared about anything other than themselves, even for just a moment, Donald Trump would still be hosting ‘”‘Celebrity Apprentice.’ But they didn’t. Instead, they were incompetent and narcissistic and cruel and relentlessly dishonest. They wrecked what they didn’t build, and they lied about it. They hurt anyone who told the truth about what they were doing. That’s all true. We all watched.

“America is still a great country, the best in the world, but our ruling class is disgusting. A vote for Trump is a vote against them,” Carlson wrote.

Tucker Carlson’s powerful speech: ‘Herd instinct is the strongest instinct’
Video: Tucker Carlson relaunches on Twitter

Yellowknife, N.T. under mandatory evacuation orders as fire closes in

Suzanne Downing
-
16
Yellowknife, N.T. under mandatory evacuation orders as fire closes in

Thousands of residents are fleeing the capital of Canada’s Northwest Territories. Yellowknife, along with several other communities, is under siege as over 200 wildfires continue to engulf the region, creating hazardous conditions.

The fires are part of a widespread failure of the government to control any of the more than 1,000 fires blazing across Canada this summer, which is the worst fire season on record. Smoke has drifted into the United States at times, creating health conditions, particularly along the Eastern Seaboard earlier this summer.

Evacuation orders were made for Yellowknife, which is home to about 20,000. The advancing flames also threaten a major highway out of the city. Emergency flights are being organized to airlift those stranded by the fires.

All residents, including the families of essential workers, are required to evacuate by today, Aug. 18. The city closed its vacant multiplex as an evacuation center.

“Residents are either sheltering in place in homes, or they have been evacuated,” the territorial government stated. “If your sheltering situation changes, please go to Sir John School to register for an evacuation flight.”

The fires have reached the province of British Columbia, where West Kelowna has seen several homes lost. At 1 a.m. Friday, a state of emergency was declared in the City of Kelowna and residents in the surrounding areas were ordered to evacuate their homes as spot fires flared in the city, which is east of Vancouver, B.C.

Surf’s up: Hurricane Hilary aims at SoCal, may disrupt West Coast travel

Alaska is one of 16 states to support Missouri’s legal defense of ban on sex-change surgeries on children

Suzanne Downing
-
9
Alaska is one of 16 states to support Missouri’s legal defense of ban on sex-change surgeries on children

In a show of unity with other states, Alaska’s Attorney General Treg Taylor has joined forces with 16 other attorneys general in filing a multistate brief to support Missouri’s defense of its ban on experimental and life-altering sex-modification procedures for children.

The brief, co-led by Alabama, Arkansas, and Tennessee, directly challenges the pro-transgender assertions put forth by the World Professional Association for Transgender Health (WPATH) and other medical interest groups, and asserts the states’ responsibility to safeguard the well-being of their youth.

The recent move comes in response to the controversial push by some medical organizations to promote pediatric sex changes as “medically necessary gender-affirming care.”

“In reality, the latest WPATH standards are gender ideology talking points masquerading as medical standards. These so-called standards advocate prescribing some children puberty blockers and having them undergo life-altering surgeries because it is considered ‘medically necessary gender affirming care,’” said Alabama Attorney General Marshall. “Our youth deserve better, and I will never stop fighting to protect our children from these radical and often irreversible medical interventions.”

The multistate brief draws attention to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit’s decision, which upheld a similar law in Tennessee, allowing it to take effect.

The document underscores the belief that states hold the authority and responsibility to ensure the health and safety of children. Drawing a parallel with European healthcare authorities’ more stringent approach to sex-modification procedures for minors based on systematic evidence reviews, the brief criticizes American medical organizations for their advocacy of unrestricted access to such procedures.

In addition to Alaska, Missouri, Arkansas, Tennessee, and Alabama, several other states joined, including Georgia, Iowa, Kansas, Kentucky, Louisiana, Mississippi, Montana, Nebraska, Oklahoma, South Carolina, Utah, and West Virginia.

Surf’s up: Hurricane Hilary aims at SoCal, may disrupt West Coast travel

Suzanne Downing
-
12
Surf’s up: Hurricane Hilary aims at SoCal, may disrupt West Coast travel

Remnants of Hurricane Hilary, now west of Mexico’s Baja Peninsula, are predicted to strengthen and aim at Baja’s coast and California over the weekend. The hurricane is now a Category 4 hurricane, extremely rare for the Pacific Coast.

As a result, many airlines serving the West Coast and Mexico are offering flexible travel policies and are waiving fees and fare differences for those who are booked this weekend to some destinations, such as Cabo San Lucas, Mexico. See the summary at the bottom of the page.

Travel alerts have been issued by airlines for Los Cabos International Airport (SJD) in Baja California. Disruptions in air travel are likely to spread throughout the North American continent; tropical storms with a lot of precipitation can cause flash floods and landslides in the Southwest, can wash out roads and disrupt power and communications.

Friday morning image of Hurricane Hilary approaching Cabo San Lucas, Baja California.

On Friday morning, a first-ever tropical storm watch was been issued by the National Weather Service for Southern California from the border of Mexico, to the San Bernardino Mountains and Catalina Island. Usually when a tropical storm reaches the Southwest, it weakens into a depression, but this one appears to be different, meteorologists say.

The Weather Service predicts the system will retain its tropical storm strength as it advances into Southern California, and even bring rain as far as southern Nevada.

The alert for excessive rainfall and flash flooding includes the the Coachella Valley and the Anza Borrego Desert east of the San Bernardino and San Diego Mountains. Some areas may receive rain equivalent to a normal year’ worth of precipitation during this storm.

Palm Springs, for instance, usually sees four or five inches of rain per year, but the forecast for Saturday to Monday is up to seven inches.

The Las Vegas office of the National Weather Service reported “there is high confidence in the likelihood of significant to historic flooding impacts occurring across much of the region, particularly in Inyo and San Bernardino counties.”

As of Friday morning, heavy surf is battering Cabo San Lucas resort beaches, shown in the photo at the top of the page.

Air travel notes:

Alaska Airlines has a flexible travel policy for passengers at Los Cabos International Airport and Loreto International Airport (LTO). The airline will accommodate changes and cancellations for flights to and from these airports.

American Airlines will waive change fees for customers who purchased their tickets by Aug. 16, and are scheduled to travel between Aug. 19 and 20. Passengers can make changes to their itineraries up until Aug. 20, and complete their travel within a year from the original ticket date. A fare difference fee applies.

Southwest Airlines customers with reservations to, from, or through Los Cabos Aug. 18, through Aug. 20, can modify their travel plans. Fliers may rebook in the original class of service or opt for standby travel within 14 days of their original travel date and between the same airports. No additional charges will be imposed.

United Airlines offers fee waivers for customers flying through Los Cabos through Aug. 23. Rebooked tickets must be in the same cabin and between the same airports as the original ticket was for.

JetBlue will waive change/cancel fees and fare differences for customers traveling to and from Los Cabos from Aug. 18 and Aug. 20. Travelers may opt for a refund if their flights were originally booked on or before Aug. 17.

High drama: Rescue of two sheep hunters from cliff near Tonsina
1...650651652...1,833Page 651 of 1,833