Sunday, July 27, 2025
Home Blog Page 583

Art Chance: Alaska at the brink of helter-skelter

By ART CHANCE

The next step in the helter-skelter scenario begins. The Left has demonstrated that it can win pretty much any consequential election in Alaska, especially those in places with built-in voter fraud, excuse me with mail-in voting.

Fundamentally, there is no organized opposition to the Left and the mortal remains of the Republican Party are nothing more than a shell; the Party needs candidates more than candidates need the Party.   

There is almost no meaningful private sector in Alaska and the oil industry might stir itself to look to its own interests but beyond that Alaska is a backwater in which it has little interest.   

Light a candle for the physical health of the pipeline infrastructure, because if they had to spend any significant amount of money to fix it, they probably wouldn’t.

For those of you who don’t know; when the pipeline is no longer transporting oil, it has to be disassembled and the right of way restored, and thus ends the oil industry in Alaska amid dancing in the streets in San Francisco.

Whether with a bang or a whimper, the days of oil are about over. The fondest hope of those who fancy themselves to be Alaska’s ruling elite is that magical day when the corpus of the Permanent Fund is safely over $100 billion. Barring a monumental Biden gaffe, that magical day will come soon.

The magic of $100 billion is that at least in the minds of the proponents of this scheme, at $100 billion in the corpus the Permanent Fund can support ongoing operations of State government and maintain the fund in perpetuity. I believe you are delusional if you believe that, but we’ll discus that later.

At $100 billion, Alaskans become trust fund babies. We don’t really need natural resource or other economic development. We don’t need a private sector other than what is minimally necessary to get our laundry done and our cars and machines fixed. Visualize the Juneau economy statewide. We don’t have to care if they disassemble the pipeline; all we have to do is wait for the check to come from the Department of Revenue.

First, that means we need to lose some population.  We need to get our population down to a minimal service population so we can get our laundry done, our food served, and routine service work done like fixing lawnmowers and the like.

Then we have our healthcare workers, our education workers, and our unionized public employees. Then we have a large, maybe larger than any of the other three, population of government dependents. Our tiny private service population and the government rackets above are the Alaska res publica. The rackets are easy to please; just give them more money, and they can buy politicians who would just love to give them that money. Those who work behind the counters and in the repair shops can just hope for some largesse.   Maybe the Legislature will come up with some extra special stipend for people who repair electric cars.

This is the brave new world the smart people envision. Alaska becomes the longtime greenie dream of a big National Park. Almost nobody does any of that nasty physical work or builds anything; we don’t need to build anything because we have everything we need and our $100 billion to keep it going. 

A third or more of our population does nothing but wait for the check and maybe make babies. It already doesn’t matter what teachers or other unionized employees do; nobody evaluates them and only a few of us mutter in the wilderness about why we spend so much for so little. 

The medical types will shed all of those with private insurance or Medicare. I’ve already learned that it is easier, better, and other than the airfare, cheaper to go to the Mayo Clinic in Phoenix. When they get rid of all us surplus people, it is lefty Utopia!

All that said, I’ve been around government for a long time. I quickly learned that the immutable law of public finance in Alaska is, “however much money there is to spend, will be spent.”  I can point you to a long list of candidates for office who promised to rein in spending only to lose to someone who promised to spend more. Sarah Palin vs. Frank Murkowski is the best example of that.

We flirted with the trust fund baby plan in this budget; we’ve scratched up every dime we could get without borrowing, and some of what we’ve done is technically borrowing, and we’re spending every dime of it. They’ve put up an attractive number for a PFD that will probably keep the masses sullen but not mutinous.

If we try to live on this “spend it all” margin, even at $100 billion, the State will be broke in five years. Alaska’s congressional and legislative delegation will be crawling to Washington, D.C. on their hands and knees to beg for money.

Welcome back to 1960. Much of America wasn’t happy to have Alaska join the union. The US was mostly just responding to Soviet anti-colonial pressure by offering statehood to two of its territories, Alaska and Hawaii. Alaska was just viewed as a welfare burden, and until the Cook Inlet oil discoveries, rightly so. Cook Inlet is all but gone and Prudhoe Bay is badly depleted. There is some opportunity for more development on the North Slope but not so long as the communists, excuse me, Democrats are in charge.

Looking at the operating budget, my “back of the matchbook” estimate is that it would take about 10%/yr just to maintain current service levels. Executive Branch wages alone cost about 4%/yr. to maintain.

State investment accounts in good years have been returning 7% or so. 

The best investment earnings we could expect are not enough to keep up with the incremental cost increases in government operations, and that requires you to assume that the Legislature won’t pile on new expenses “for the children” or some other such foolishness.

It will be 50 years in Alaska this September. I haven’t called the real estate agent or bought the “for sale” signs, but it has been on my mind.

Art Chance is a retired Director of Labor Relations for the State of Alaska, formerly of Juneau and now living in Anchorage. He is the author of the book, “Red on Blue, Establishing a Republican Governance,” available at Amazon.

Art Chance: Palin is finishing what she started, as every Democrat’s favorite Republican

Art Chance: The barbarians have been inside the gates before in Alaska, and they’re back

Art Chance: The 1609 Project and the indentured servitude of immigrants




Jay McDonald: Anchorage School District marred by culture of secrecy

By JAY MCDONALD

There is a controversy stirring around Robert Service High School, but parents eager to make sense of what their children are telling them have been left with more questions than answers by the slow and tight-lipped Anchorage School District. 

While many residents are shocked by this seemingly out-of-the-blue event involving allegations of drug use and sexual impropriety among senior staff, the warning signs were there. Accounts of the goings on at Service paint a picture that raises questions about how ASD is running operations. Internal staff surveys point to deeper systemic problems.

In the School Climate and Connectedness Survey for 2022, only 19% of employee respondents at Service High School believed “the principal and other leaders in the school make good decisions.” Teachers who took the survey clearly rang the alarm bell on Service’s leadership. 

The nearest comparable school was Dimond High with 28% of teachers similarly concerned. Nearly two-thirds of the same respondents at Service High did not believe “decisions are made based on what is best for students” and a whopping 72% did not believe “the principal looks out for the personal welfare of school or staff members.”

The survey results show that there is little hope from Service High teachers that anyone above the principal will step in to help prevent future misconduct.

These surveys are conducted for a reason. Will ASD use the information it has to investigate and be proactive? Or will administrators wait until another outrageous incident occurs and move in quickly for damage control? Based on the experience that one teacher has relayed to me, I believe the latter is the most likely outcome.

Such one-sided results in the survey are indicators of a hostile and dysfunctional workplace,  in which both teachers and students suffer. 

How can we hope to pull Alaska out of our abysmal ranking in education in this environment? We need to ask ourselves what kind of person we require to lead our teachers and set the example for our children. 

Michelle Obama said, “People that are truly strong lift others up. People who are truly powerful bring others together.” Robert Service High School’s principal was neither lifting people up nor bringing them together. 

What happened at Service is a small part of the story. This year alone, several schools in the district have had one or more teachers walk away from their post mid-year because they could no longer take the environment created by administrators. Being “in it for the children” was no longer enough reason to keep taking the abuse, according to one teacher I spoke with, who asked for anonymity. She described a “keep quiet and keep your head down” mentality.

Teachers are afraid to ask questions or speak out for fear of retaliation as well as complete lack of support at the district level. They pay union dues hoping for support because they have no idea how to stand up for themselves in situations involving sexual or other harassment, discrimination, mental abuse, and outright dishonesty.  Unfortunately, in many of these situations, it seems the union sides with senior leadership against lower-level teachers by default, according to my source.

ASD teachers know that more than one principal has been moved across the district to serve at another school when facing misconduct allegations instead of being held accountable, far more often than you can find in a Google search.  

A May 2019 article published in the Anchorage Daily News about the removal of the school district’s chief of Human Resources tells you all you need to know about how ASD feels about releasing such information. 

“In a statement Monday, the school district said it doesn’t comment on personnel matters or ongoing investigations,” the story said. Innocent until proven guilty is the American way, but so is the sixth amendment right to a speedy trial, and this is a right owed to the public as well as to the accused. As the four-year anniversary of that statement bears down on us, few details have been released to the public. 

Teachers, parents and students deserve due process and transparency on “personnel issues” regardless of how uncomfortable it may be.  The culture of secrecy and hiding information from public view has crept into every corner of ASD and it will be no shock if we hear nothing more of what comes next for the Service High School principal.

I urge you to demand answers, transparency, and accountability in these dealings. These injustices create a toxic work environment that alienates our best and brightest teachers. When our children’s safety and education is at stake, parents cannot afford to be left in the dark.

Jay McDonald is an Anchorage parent and US Army veteran. This is the first in a series he is writing with the help of Anchorage School District teachers who are afraid to speak publicly.

Biden slaps at GOP in his reelection launch; RNC launches counter attack

President Joe Biden launched his reelection bid on Tuesday, saying that his first term was about fighting for democracy, and accusing “MAGA extremists” of “lining up to take on those bedrock freedoms.”

His prepared video roll for social media was clipped together with imagery of an America in which he and Vice President Kamala Harris are good and that features Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene, former President Donald Trump, and Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis as bad for the country.

At the same time, the Republican National Committee released a video that uses artificial intelligence and powerful video to darkly imagine what another four years would be like under the “weakest president” America has ever had.

The election is in November of 2024. Already announced Republicans are former President Donald Trump, former South Carolina Gov. Nikki Haley, former Arkansas Gov. Asa Hutchinson, talk show host and author Larry Elder, former Montana Secretary of State Corey Stapleton, and entrepreneur Vivek Ramaswamy.

Democrat candidates include Robert F. Kennedy Jr. and New Age spiritualist Marianne Williamson.

Biden is 80 and by the time he would finish his second term, he would be about 86, as he was born in November of 1942.

His dementia is evident and he slurs his way through his speeches. He has held few press conferences, and is carefully scripted for every occasion. He has given only 54 press interviews, the fewest since Ronald Reagan was in office. Biden’s predecessor gave 202 during his first two years, and Barack Obama gave 275 interviews.

Even the New York Times has taken note of Biden’s lack of accountability: “But as Mr. Biden prepares to announce his bid for a second term as soon as Tuesday, he is accelerating the demise of traditions that have underpinned the relationship with the news media for decades. The president’s strategy of keeping the press at arm’s length is a bet that he can sidestep those traditions in a new media environment. And it is public evidence that Mr. Biden’s political strategists want to protect him from the unscripted exchanges that have often resulted in missteps and criticism.”

An example of what the Biden campaign would like to downplay was evident on Monday. At a White House event for Teacher of the Year on Monday, the clearly feeble president was led by First Lady Jill Biden out of the White House and to the Rose Garden by the hand, as she visibly tugged him along like a child. Once he took the podium, he slurred through his speech, reading from a massive screen set up behind the teachers who had gathered.

Notably, Biden’s campaign launch video shows Vice President Kamala Harris twice, indicating that he intends to keep her as his running mate.

The launch video positions Biden as the defender of democracy and avoids the uncomfortable topic of his economic policies that have led to hardship for so many Americans.

In addition to his radical social agenda that has begun to erase the biological definition of male and female and that has taken aim at the family unit by saying that children belong to the government, Biden has crippled the nation’s economy by increasing federal spending by $10 trillion.

Since he took office, he increased debt projections by $6 trillion over 10 years. National debt is now nearly $32 trillion. His executive orders alone have increased spending by more than $1 trillion over 10 years. His inflation-driving economic policies have increased the Congressional Budget Office’s projection of interest payments on the debt by $3.6 trillion over those 10 years.

In fact, Americans now make 3.6% less a week than they did before Biden took office, and inflation has jumped to 15%. Workers, through inflation eating away at their incomes, have lost the equivalent of $7,400 worth of income in two years.

Under his proposed budget for FY 2023, spending is $73 trillion, or 23.4% of gross domestic product, the highest sustained level in American history. Taxes will be $58 trillion, or nearly 19% of gross domestic product, also the highest sustained level in history. Deficits would be $14.4 trillion, or 4.7% of GDP, the highest sustained level in history.

Biden’s current budget has the debt growing by $16 trillion over 10 years, or $50,000 for every American. By 2032, that debt would be $135,000 per citizen.

Under CBO’s current projections, the gross federal debt would increase from $31.7 trillion today (123 percent of GDP) to $52 trillion (132 percent of GDP) in 2033. The CBO’s most recent projections have the debt growing to $154 trillion by 2053, which would equal more than $1 million per American household ($540,000 after adjusting for inflation) — more than four times current median household net worth.

Under Biden’s budget, however, defense spending would fall to the lowest level as a percent of GDP since before World War II.

Supreme Court rejects oil companies’ attempt to move climate change lawsuits out of local courts

Municipal lawsuits against oil companies filed in state courts will now remain in those courts, as the US Supreme Court rejected attempts by Exxon Mobil, Chevron, BP, and other companies to move the lawsuits to federal courts.

This decision means that cities seeking to hold energy companies accountable for the harms caused by burning hydrocarbons will continue their legal battles in state courts, which are generally seen as more aligned with such claims.

There are numerous climate change lawsuits pending in state courts across the country, and the Biden Administration supports keeping them at the state level, as state courts are typically considered more liberal than federal courts on climate-related issues, and President Biden wants to see more pain inflicted on oil companies, but not pain associated with the White House.

For several years, oil companies have been facing over two dozen climate change lawsuits at various levels of the US court system, seeking damages related to climate change impacts. Many of these lawsuits allege that the oil companies were aware of the dangers of fossil fuels and engaged in fraud and created a public nuisance. Resolving these claims in federal courts has been challenging, according to observers.

In the recent Supreme Court decision, Justice Brett Kavanaugh was the only justice who favored moving a lawsuit filed in Boulder, Colo., to a federal court. Other cases are pending in states such as Maryland, Hawaii, Rhode Island, and California.

The court’s ruling did not indicate how the Supremes would decide the merits of the cases.

Peninsula-Clarion, like Juneau Empire, shrinks to two print days a week next month

The Kenai Peninsula-Clarion is reducing its print editions to two days a week, starting May 3.

The Clarion is owned by Sound Publishing, the same news company that owns the Juneau Empire, which is also moving to a twice-a-week print edition. The newspapers will be focusing more on their online news offerings, as the printed word becomes more expensive to produce and distribute, and as more readers adapt to a 24-hour digital news cycle.

The economics of printing just two days a week are uncertain at best. The fewer the people who subscribe to newsprint editions and the fewer the copies that are printed, the more expensive it becomes maintain staff to print the small number of copies and distribute those papers, as subscribers become spread out and paper deliverers can not make enough money to make it worth doing a route. Eventually, newspapers will shut their presses down altogether. In Juneau and in Kenai, the newspapers will be printed in the Seattle area, and flown up to Alaska, adding weather and flight delays to the mix that may make it increasingly an impractical option.

Some newspapers have not chosen to experiment with this bridge to the future, but to make the leap altogether. For example, on Feb. 26, The Birmingham NewsThe Huntsville Times and Mobile’s Press-Register stopped printing altogether, and moved online.

Biden to parents: Your children are not your children; they belong to the government

In April of 2022, President Joe Biden told American parents that they don’t have authority over their own children. In a speech last year at the Teachers of the Year celebration, he said, “They’re all our children. And the reason you’re the teachers of the year is because you recognize that. They’re not somebody else’s children. They’re like yours when they’re in the classroom,” he said.

Today, Biden stayed on message: “There is no such thing as someone else’s child. No such thing as someone else’s child. Our nation’s children are all our children,” Biden said as he honored the 2023 teacher of the year in the White House Rose Garden.

Those words stung conservatives, who have witnessed government take control of their children by increments. In Washington state, lawmakers just passed a bill that will allow shelters and the government to essentially kidnap children from their parents if their parents don’t approve of gender transition procedures.

Alaska’s Nick Begich was not impressed by the president’s words. The former congressional candidate said on Facebook, “Today Joe Biden said the quiet part out loud. ‘There’s no such thing as someone else’s child. Our nation’s children are all our children.’ Let’s be clear: children are the responsibility of parents. Children are NOT property of the state.”

He then went on to point out Congresswoman Mary Peltola’s record:

“Of course, Mary Peltola proudly OPPOSED the Parents Bill of Rights Act which passed the Republican House just a few weeks ago. Her position in opposition to the basic rights of parents is neither pro family nor pro freedom,” Begich wrote on Facebook.

Departure lounge: FAA facing leadership vacuum as interim chief Billy Nolen announces his exit

The Federal Aviation Administration’s interim administrator Billy Nolen is leaving this summer, and President Joe Biden will have to act quickly to replace the key position. Biden’s first choice withdrew last month when it became clear that he was not going to get through confirmation.

Denver International Airport CEO Phillip Washington’s nomination stalled in the Senate Commerce, Science, and Transportation Committee, because Republicans said he lacked aviation experience.

The Senate Commerce Committee is chaired by Washington State Sen. Maria Cantwell, a Democrat. Ranking minority member is Republican Sen. Ted Cruz of Texas. Alaska Sen. Dan Sullivan also serves on the committee and was instrumental in sealing the fate of the nominee Washington.

Sen. Sullivan, during the confirmation hearing for Washington, told the nominee that his resume didn’t hold up to scrutiny for someone who is to be in charge of the safety of the nation’s airways.

Nolen made his announcement Friday in a memo to staff: “But now it is time for a new captain to guide the FAA. I told [Sec. of Transportation] Buttigieg and notified the White House that I will depart as a new nominee is named this summer.”

The FAA has faced a number of problems, including having its NOTAM computers shut down inexplicably in January, prompting the sudden halt of all flights. The computer system was damaged after a contractor deleted essential files, the FAA explained. More than 1,100 flights were canceled and 7,700 were delayed as a result.

Also of concern are the number of near-misses occurring at airports, where two or more aircraft are cleared for the same runway or taxiway at the same time. By March of 2023, there had been 613 runway incursion incidents in the six prior months according to the FAA.

The agency has been without a permanent leader since March of 2022, when Trump-appointed Administrator Steve Dickson left after serving less than half of his five-year term.

HB 174 reforms state investment policies to focus on financial goals over social-environmental goals

Rep. Kevin McCabe introduced HB 174, a bill to reform the way that state funds are managed in Alaska.

The bill seeks to ensure that fiduciaries of state funds prioritize the financial interests of the beneficiaries above all other considerations when investing public funds.

This means that investment decisions will be made solely on the basis of financial gain, rather than any external social, political, or ideological goals, his office said.

Recently a Biden Administration rule allows fiduciaries to pick and choose between financial or ideological goals, when managing other people’s money. This, without the consent of the people to whom they have a fiduciary duty, including hundreds of millions of Americans whose retirement funds are at risk.

Some of Alaska’ state funds are invested in what’s called ESG funds — environmental, social, governance funds. That includes the retirement funds and the Alaska Permanent Fund.

“This approach is perfectly in line with Alaska’s ongoing efforts to establish a comprehensive and sustainable long-term fiscal plan for the state, especially in light of the current economic challenges facing Alaska,” said McCabe. “This bill will set a new standard for investment management in Alaska, ensuring that the financial future of the state is secured for generations to come, and I am proud to introduce it.”  

By preserving these principles into law, Alaska would join a growing number of states that have introduced or enacted similar legislation, demonstrating a commitment to responsible investment management and fiscal responsibility.

“Through prioritizing financial gain over external considerations, board members of the Alaska Retirement Management Board and the Alaska Permanent Fund Corporation Board will be prevented from taking any actions that seek to advance social, political, or ideological interests concerning investments entrusted to the board,” McCabe said.

The introduction of this bill marks a significant step forward in the pursuit of responsible investment management in Alaska, he added. “With its passage, citizens can continue to enjoy the many benefits of living in this great state, safe in the knowledge that their financial interests are being protected and prioritized above all else,” his press release explained.

Biden threatens to veto U.S. tariffs on Chinese-made solar panels

President Biden issued a warning to Congress on Monday, expressing his intent to use his veto power for the third time. This time, he is prepared to veto legislation aimed at maintaining trade tariffs on Chinese-made solar panels. The Biden Administration had suspended those tariffs.

The president’s first veto was to halt Congress’s efforts to end environmental, social, and governance (ESG) preference policies for retirement funds. His second veto was against Congress’s attempt to block his expansion of the definition of federal government-controlled waterways.

President Biden has made it clear that solar imports from China, even if laundered through other countries, will not be subject to U.S. trade laws. The bill is scheduled for a vote in the House this week, after the House Ways and Means Committee approved the resolution last week.

The president’s budget office has emphasized that halting tariffs on China-produced solar panels is crucial to his green energy goals. The White House stated, “Passage of this joint resolution would undermine these efforts and create deep uncertainty for jobs and investments in the solar supply chain and the solar installation market. The Commerce rule provides a short-term bridge to ensure there is a thriving U.S. solar installation industry ready to purchase the solar products that will be made in these American factories once they are operational.”

But Biden is ignoring the inconvenient truth that the solar panels are being made by slaves. Last fall, Republican lawmakers sent a letter to the Department of Homeland Security’s Inspector General, expressing concerns about solar panels produced in China using slave labor.

China currently dominates global solar panel production, with 78% of solar cells produced in 2019 coming from China, a country considered by many Americans to be an adversary. A Gallup poll in March revealed that 50% of Americans view China as the nation’s greater enemy, with most of the rest (32%) naming Russia.

A 2021 report in The New York Times corroborates that solar products made for the U.S. market are indeed sourced from slave labor and human rights atrocities.