Sunday, May 10, 2026
Home Blog Page 330

Ballot Measure 2, the repeal of ranked-choice voting, is the subject of a pair of required public hearings

7

As required by Alaska law, the Office of the Lieutenant Governor will hold a public hearing on ballot initiatives that will appear on the Nov. 5 ballot. The hearing is perfunctory because the matter is already approved for the ballot.

According to Alaska Statute: “At least 30 days before the election at which an initiative is to appear on the ballot, the lieutenant governor or a designee of the lieutenant governor shall hold two or more public hearings concerning the initiative in each judicial district of the state.”

The hearings for Ballot Measure 2, “An Act Restoring Political Party Primaries and Single-Choice General Elections,” is scheduled for Sept. 23 and Sept. 24 from 2-4 p.m.

Each public hearing will consist of a statement of support from the proponents of the ballot measure and follow with a statement of opposition from a group opposing the measure. The public will then be allowed to call in for the remainder of the hearing to leave public testimony.  Meetings may conclude early if there are no remaining members of the public signed up to testify. 

To allow for all residents of the state to participate via teleconference, the following call-in lines are assigned:

  • Juneau-prefix callers 586-9085
  • Anchorage-prefix callers 563-9085
  • All others 844-586-9085 (toll free)

Individuals may listen live at the above numbers, or online at akleg.gov

Members of the public may also view the hearings live at the following Legislative Information Office locations:

Anchorage Legislative Information Office
(907) 269-0111
1500 W. Benson Blvd.
Anchorage, AK 99503
TDD: (907) 269-0260
[email protected]

Bethel Legislative Information Office
(907) 543-3541
460 Ridgecrest Drive Ste. 215
Bethel, AK 99559-0866
[email protected]

Fairbanks Legislative Information Office
(907) 452-4448
1292 Sadler Way Suite 308
Fairbanks, AK 99701
TDD: (907) 456-5076
[email protected]

Juneau Legislative Information Office
(907) 465-4648
State Capitol, Terry Miller Building, Suite 111
Juneau, AK 99801-1182
TDD: (907) 465-4980
[email protected]

Kenai Legislative Information Office
(907) 283-2030
145 Main Street Loop, Suite 217
Kenai, AK 99611
[email protected]

Ketchikan Legislative Information Office
(907) 225-9675
1900 First Ave, Suite 310
Ketchikan, AK 99901
[email protected]

Kodiak Legislative Information Office
(907) 486-8116
305 Center Ave. Suite 1
Kodiak, AK 99615-6431
[email protected]

Matsu Legislative Information Office
(907) 376-3704
600 E. Railroad Avenue
Wasilla, AK 99654-8135
[email protected]

Nome Legislative Information Office
(907) 443-5555
103 Front Street, State Office Bldg
Nome, AK 99762-1630
[email protected]

Seward Legislative Information Office
(907) 224-5066
302 Railway Ste. 119
Seward, AK 99664
[email protected]

Sitka Legislative Information Office
(907) 747-6276
201 Katlian Street, Suite 103
Sitka, AK 99835
[email protected]

Teamsters poll members and it’s a landslide for Trump (so no endorsement for president this year)

The International Order of Teamsters has polled its members, and the result is that greater than 58% of the membership favors Donald Trump for president. It’s just the union bosses that don’t.

As a result of that polling, the union will not be endorsing either Kamala Harris or Trump.

“After reviewing member polls for President Trump and Kamala Harris, we found insufficient support for either candidate, thus we will not endorse a presidential candidate for 2024,” the union wrote.

The Teamsters are reliably Democrat-endorsing, so sitting out an endorsement opportunity is a huge change for the union. The last time the union didn’t endorse a Democrat in the presidential race was in 1988, when George H.W. Bush defeated Democrat Michael Dukakis.

One of the main reasons cited this year is that Trump, although supported by the membership, has not committed to vetoing “right to work” laws, a major issue for the union, which represents 1.3 million American workers.

Before the Democrat coup that took Joe Biden out of the race, Biden had polled 44.3% to Trump’s 36.3% with Teamsters rank-and-file members.

Watch video: Supporters of Democrats are stealing, vandalizing Republican campaign signs in Fairbanks

39

The campaign signs of conservatives in Fairbanks have been targeted by leftist vandals. Perhaps they took to heart Sen. Scott Kawasaki’s request that they “Be Gay. Do Crime.”

Signs posted for Mike Cronk for Senate, Leslie Hajdukovich for Senate, and even Tammie Wilson for Assembly have been destroyed in what looks like a concerted and coordinated campaign of destruction. Reports have been made to the police.

In the case of Hajdukovich signs that were loaded up and hauled away from a private business, there are videos of the signs actually being stolen by thieves. Republican House candidate Bart Lebon’s sign was stolen along with Hajdukovich’s; they had been placed next to each other at that location.

Enhancement of man driving truck with the stolen Hajdukovich sign in the back.

A portion of Hajdukovich’s sign was found on the side of the Richardson Highway on Sunday. Wilson’s sign was found on the side of the Steese Highway.

Here’s one video of the crime in action:

Alex Gimarc: The desperate lie being told about how military voters must have ranked-choice voting

By ALEX GIMARC

Polling for repeal of the open primary-ranked-choice voting must be going in favor of repeal, as the anti-repeal side cranked up the rhetoric a couple notches last week. 

This time around, they express their concern for Alaska military members who they claim will be denied their right to vote for a candidate of their choice should the repeal be successful.

Before the discussion, I want to remind readers that in addition to the road to a very hot place being paved with good intentions, we have the Samuel Johnson’s observation from April 1775 that “Patriotism is the last refuge of the scoundrel.”  

The leftist pro-ranked-choice non-profits from outside the state are now wrapping themselves in the flag and professed love for military members stationed here in Alaska. Perhaps we need to take a look at their newest claim.

The claim is that a voter has to be a registered party member in order to vote for a candidate of that party.  This, is at best, a half-truth and at worst another lie, as under Alaska Statute at the time RCV was passed (AK Stat 15.25.0606 (2019)):

(b) A voter may vote only one primary election ballot. A voter may vote a political party ballot only if the voter is registered as affiliated with that party, is allowed to participate in the party primary under the party’s bylaws, or is registered as nonpartisan or undeclared rather than as affiliated with a particular political party and the party’s bylaws do not restrict participation by nonpartisan or undeclared voters in the party’s primary.

Before 2019, state law allowed registered non-partisans or undeclared voters to vote in any party’s primary as long as that particular party did not restrict participation by non-partisans or undeclared voters in the primary. Neither the Republican Party nor the Democratic Party restricted undeclared or nonpartisan registrants.

Sounds like our Outside pro-RCV “friends” with $7.5 million to spend on ads are making it up as they go again, claiming that military members are somehow victimized by a requirement to declare they are something, anything before voting in the primary. Note that no such requirement exists for voting in the general election.  

Once again, we are left with the question: If RCV is such a great thing, why are its supporters continuing to spew increasingly hysterical, fraudulent claims? 

At this point they are either flopping around like a well-hooked Russian River red or simply tossing stuff against a wall trying to find out what sticks. Either way, it looks like their internal polling isn’t nearly as positive as they let on, as they’ve changed their story at least three times since ads started running.  

You would think that a side with the massive spending advantage they currently hold ($7.5 million to $60,000) would at least get the messaging down correctly via focus grouping like they did in 2020. 

Trouble in RCV-land?  We can only hope.  

Alex Gimarc lives in Anchorage since retiring from the military in 1997. His interests include science and technology, environment, energy, economics, military affairs, fishing and disabilities policies. His weekly column “Interesting Items” is a summary of news stories with substantive Alaska-themed topics. He was a small business owner and Information Technology professional.

Kroger chair confident merger with Albertsons will prevail in court

14

Kroger Chair and CEO Rodney McMullen told SeafoodSource news that he is confident about the retailer’s position in its pending merger with Albertsons, as final arguments were starting Tuesday in the federal court case to decide whether it moves forward. Kroger merged with Fred Meyer in 1998, and Albertsons merged with Safeway in 2015, and had previously merged with Carrs in 1999.

McMullen said that the position of the companies is strong in their battle against Big Labor and big government, as they fight the U.S. Federal Trade Commission.

Rep. Mary Peltola has come out vocally against the merger of the grocery companies, which are trying to compete against a growing presence of Amazon and Walmart in Alaska’s food retail system. She has taken credit for stopping the companies from combining into one. Albertsons has already agreed to spin off Safeway/Carrs stores in Alaska in order for the merger to go through, but Democrats and labor unions still object.

“As we near the close of the FTC’s preliminary injunction hearing, we are confident in the facts and the strength of our position,” McMullen told the publication. “The food industry has always been competitive and will continue to be after this merger. We are committed to closing this merger because bringing Kroger and Albertsons together will provide meaningful and measurable benefits – lower prices, secure jobs and expanded access to fresh, affordable food – for customers, associates, and communities across the country.”

In lower court hearings, the companies claimed the merger would allow them to lower prices and more effectively compete with retail giants like Walmart, Costco, and Amazon, the Associated Press reported.

Read the rest of this story at SeafoodSource.com.

Alex Gimarc: Relentless ranked-choice voting ads are increasingly filled with bald-faced lies

By ALEX GIMARC

A new round of pro-ranked choice voting ads have been running for at least a week. The ads exhort the listener to vote against the repeal in November. The new arguments are all wrapped around supposed “loss of freedom” to vote for whomever you want to vote for in the primary election.

Who are the perpetrators of this repeal of ranked-choice voting? The ads blame usual punching bag — political insiders and shadowy political bosses.  

The ads are backed by same three entities as the previous round, Unite America InstituteFinal Five Fund, and the Action Now Institute. The three organizations continue to be outside non-profits using dark money to meet their political goals in Alaska. 

The difference this time around is that they finally managed to find a local Alaskan to chair their effort: Lesil McGuire, former Republican state senator, who frankly ought to know better.

Note the disconnect here. After running and winning multiple elections as a proud Republican, McGuire is now arm-in-arm with a group of outside non-profits who believe Republicans, Democrats, Greens, AIP, and Libertarians should not be able to select their own party candidates. This is a mistake, an unforced error.

The biggest claim the pro-RCV crowd is making is that Alaskans who want to select their own candidates are somehow pawns of party elite, insiders. Is there any truth to that?

Given that RCV was brought to Alaska by “Team Lisa” Murkowski, after her far-too-close reelection in 2016, one can fairly easily demonstrate that the real shadowy political elite were actually the people who brought RCV into Alaska and deceptively sold it to an unsuspecting electorate.

Note that Alaska law allows anyone to get his or her name on the primary ballot. Before RCV, every single candidate who won a party’s primary made it to the general election as long as it was a recognized political party. Normally, this included Republican, democrat, Green, Libertarian, Alaskan Independence. 

The Republican Moderate Party was a player for a couple election cycles. Over the years, Green, Libertarian, and Republican Moderates lost the ability to field a candidate because they received insufficient votes in the general to make the next general election ballot. 

As usual, independents and registered non-partisans could make the general election ballot based on signatures gathered.  

Under the old regime, we regularly saw 5-8 possible candidates for the statewide offices, with smaller numbers for more local legislative seats. But now, RCV eliminates our choices by only sending the top four candidates to the general election, doing what they accuse their current punching bag of doing.  

The most important thing the current jungle primary does is minimize the ability of political parties to select their preferred candidates. Joining a party is relatively easy. You work within the party structure to select your candidate, let them sort it out in the primary with the winner going on to the general election. Should nobody get a majority in the general, they go to a runoff.  

The pro-RCV crowd is of the opinion that Alaskans aren’t sufficiently intelligent to select their own party candidates, blaming all pushback on some mythical group of party insiders and elites. But we see quite clearly that the only elites involved are those connected with Team Lisa who gave us RCV and who are today furiously defending this thing.  

The pro-RCV political elite continue to rail against the political choices of not so well-connected Alaskans, those who do not have the resources to bring in multiple Outside non-profits with millions of dollars of dark money to defend their new election system by blanketing the airways with ads.

In fact, the repeal effort is a completely grass roots effort. Calling it an inside job is committing fraud on the Alaskan citizens, just like they committed with the promise four years ago that RCV would eliminate Outside money, dark money from Alaskan elections, a promise conveniently dropped from the current round of ads. They lied before. They are lying today.  

Fool me once, shame on you. Fool me twice, shame on me. Don’t let them get away with it again.  

Alex Gimarc lives in Anchorage since retiring from the military in 1997. His interests include science and technology, environment, energy, economics, military affairs, fishing and disabilities policies. His weekly column “Interesting Items” is a summary of news stories with substantive Alaska-themed topics. He was a small business owner and Information Technology professional.

Learn more about ranked-choice voting at Foundation for Government Accountability.

How did Peltola vote on bill to prevent Communist Chinese money from interfering in U.S. elections?

15

After missing 40% of her votes in Congress over the summer, Alaska Rep. Mary Peltola showed up to work on Tuesday to vote against the “No Foreign Election Interference Act,” a bill to crack down on foreign money influencing U.S. elections.

Every Republican voted in support of suspending rules and passing H.R. 8314, which prohibits tax-exempt organizations that receive funding from foreign nationals from contributing to political committees for eight years from the date that entity received a contribution or gift from a foreign national.

Congresswoman Nicole Malliotakis, a member of the House Committee on Ways and Means, introduced the No Foreign Election Interference Act. Currently, the Federal Election Campaign Act prohibits foreign nationals from donating money directly to U.S. campaigns. However, there are no laws or regulations preventing foreign nationals from influencing U.S. elections by directing funds to 501(c)(3) and 501(c)(4) organizations or other tax-exempt organizations.

Under this bill tax-exempt entities would be barred from contributing to a political committee eight years from the date it received a contribution or gift from a foreign national. The first two disqualified contributions would be punished by a fine totaling 200% of the donation amount. A third contribution would result in the automatic revocation of tax-exempt status for the organization making the political committee donation.

Last month, Ways and Means Committee Republicans wrote to Internal Revenue Service (IRS) Commissioner Daniel Werfel raising concerns about foreign adversaries exercising influence over American-based tax-exempt organizations after recent reports shed light several U.S.-based tax-exempt organizations, including the Energy FoundationThe People’s Forum, and the Berger Action Fund that have been funding far-left advocacy groups, promoting Chinese Communist Party propaganda, and fueling antisemitic protests to influence America’s political landscape.

The Energy Foundation claims to be headquartered in California, however, tax forms show the group refers to itself as “Energy Foundation China,” and reports suggest the majority of its operations are conducted in China with a staff that has substantial connections to the CCP. The group contributed $3.8 million to promote “green” energy policies that would increase our country’s dependence on Chinese minerals and materials.

Roy Singham, a self described socialist who’s based in Shanghai, owns and operates a complex network of America-based nonprofits and has funded the The People’s Forum which has been at the center of a number of antisemitic incidents since the October 7 attacks in Israel. Singham has provided hundreds of millions of dollars to groups that mix progressive advocacy with CCP talking points, and its reported that he works closely “with the Chinese government media machine and is financing its propaganda world wide.” To date, it remains unclear how Singham, his entities and the U.S.-based individuals he’s associated with are being funded.

The Berger Action Fund, a nonprofit funded by Swiss billionaire Hansjörg Wyss, recently funneled $60 million to 13 left-wing advocacy groups focused on issues ranging from voter engagement to environmental initiatives. Among those subgroups he funds is the Sixteen Thirty Fund, which finances campaigns such as ranked-choice voting, Forrest Dunbar for Senate, and other leftist causes and candidates.

Peltola refused to join the 16 Democrats who voted in favor of the bill, which had 218 yeas and 181 nays. The bill needed two-thirds votes to pass, because it was considered a “suspension of the rules bill,” used for bills that typically pass easily because there is broad agreement. All of the “no” votes were Democrats.

Division of Elections was among many around country that was target of suspicious envelopes

7

The Division of Elections was notified Monday that several Secretaries of State and election offices across the country received suspicious packages or envelopes containing an unknown substance via U.S. mail, with no immediate reports that any of the packages contained hazardous material. 

The division was alerted later that same day by the US Postal Service that, indeed, an envelope matching the description of the suspicious packages was en route to the Division of Elections office in Juneau.

On Tuesday, the Division of Elections was notified that the Postal Service was able to intercept the suspicious envelope before it reached its intended destination. The suspicious envelope and its contents have been turned over to authorities for further investigation.

“This incident was quickly and safely resolved due to the swift and proactive actions of the US Postal Service, the Dept. of Homeland Security’s Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency, FBI, and Division of Elections staff,” the Division of Elections said.

“Our democracy is founded on the principle that every voice matters and every vote counts. Acts of intimidation, harassment, or violence undermine these core values and erode the trust in our electoral process. We are committed to protecting our election workers and ensuring a safe and secure environment for them to carry out their duties. I urge everyone to respect the election process and those who make it possible. Threatening behavior, in any form, will be addressed swiftly and with the full force of the law,” said Lt. Governor Nancy Dahlstrom.

Murkowski announces Christmas essay contest for fourth-grade Alaskans

29

U.S. Sen. Lisa Murkowski announced an essay contest for fourth graders in Alaska to celebrate the 2024 U.S. Capitol Christmas Tree, which comes from Alaska’s Tongass National Forest.

The Tongass National Forest is where the Democratic Administration of federal government has made logging uneconomical since the Clinton White House, and now the Biden White House.

“The time-honored tradition of the U.S. Capitol Christmas Tree is something I look forward to every holiday season, particularly when it comes from Alaska,” said Sen. Murkowski. “I look forward to selecting one young Alaskan to flip the switch and turn on the lights for the national Christmas tree when it arrives from the Tongass National Forest and graces the west lawn of the Capitol.”

Fourth grade students are invited to write no more than 250 words on what they would like the country to know about Alaska’s Christmas tree this year, and why it is so special, she said. Sen. Murkowski will select one student’s submission, and invite them and their family on an all-expenses paid trip to Washington, DC in early December to play an integral role in the tree-lighting ceremony alongside members of Congress and the public, as well as enjoy Christmas festivities throughout the District. Read Anna DeVolld’s winning submission from 2015 here.

Additional information for the essay contest:

  • Handwritten
  • No more than 250 words
  • Submission must include parent or guardian contact information, and can be scanned and emailed to: [email protected], or mailed to Anchorage office at: 510 L St. Suite 600, Anchorage, AK, 99501
  • Submissions must be received, or postmarked by, Oct. 4, 2024.