Thursday, October 15, 2026
Home Blog Page 32

Alaska Awards $5 million to Hydro and Solar Energy Projects

The Alaska State Legislature has approved two Alaska Energy Authority (AEA) Renewable Energy Fund (REF) grants totaling approximately $5 million to advance hydro and solar energy projects in areas served by the Alaska Power & Telephone Company (AP&T) headquartered in Ketchikan, AK. The appropriations, included in the State of Alaska’s FY2027 budget recently signed by Governor Mike Dunleavy, provide $2 million for the expansion of the Goat Lake Hydroelectric Project reservoir in Southeast Alaska and $2,953,085 for a solar and battery system serving Allakaket located in the Interior.

Goat Lake Reservoir Expansion – $2,000,000

The $2 million REF grant for the Goat Lake Hydroelectric Project will help fund an expansion of the reservoir. The Goat Lake project has been licensed since 1996 and occupies land in the Tongass National Forrest. The project’s powerhouse uses a Pelton turbine generator with a 4.0-megawatt capacity and generates approximately 15,000 MWh per year. AP&T uses power generated by the Goat Lake project to provide electricity for about 1,000-1,5000 homes, primarily located in Skagway.

Senator Jesse Kiehl (D-Juneau) stated: “This project has it all: low-cost, local electricity that’s fish safe, already plugged in, and prevents burning 7 million gallons of diesel. With benefits more than 6 times the cost, this makes total sense for Alaska. I’m proud to play a role in the Goat Lake Hydro expansion.”

“AP&T’s efforts to develop additional clean energy at Goat Lake are particularly timely as communities pursue greater electrification through heat pumps, electric vehicles, and shore power for marine vessels,” said Representative Andi Story (D-Juneau). “The reservoir expansion presents a unique opportunity to combine public investment with private sector expertise and efficiency to support the region’s energy needs for decades to come.”

Allakaket Solar Project – $2,953,085

Under a proposed independent power producer (IPP) structure, Allakaket Village will own REF-funded solar and battery assets and sell power to AP&T as a lower-cost alternative to diesel generation. ANTHC will serve as the project developer, working in conjunction with AP&T’s engineers.

“Having grown up and lived in rural Alaska, I understand firsthand the challenges created by high energy costs,” said Senator Mike Cronk (R-Tok/ Northway). “Due to the high cost of transporting diesel fuel to the community, Allakaket residents face some of the highest energy costs in the state. This project represents an important step toward reducing those costs and improving opportunities for local families, community facilities, and businesses.”

“Renewable energy projects are essential to rural Alaska,” said Representative Rebecca Schwanke (R-Glenallen). “Being able to bring a solar and battery project to Allakaket with the support and technical expertise of the Alaska Energy Authority could not come at a better time given the high cost of fuel.”

Why Stop Celebrating? MRAK’s 76% Off Sale Extended Through July!

0

Why stop celebrating? For 250 years, Americans have fought to preserve our nation’s principles of freedom from tyranny, equality under the law, and self-governance.

American veterans throughout history have fought valiantly for freedom. American citizens have stewarded the greatest country in the world for a quarter millennium. That is worth celebrating!

It hasn’t been an easy fight and it never will be. It is the duty of every true American patriot to conserve America’s identity and values and resist the ever-increasing efforts to pull America into despotism, anarchy, communism, socialism, and every other structure in enmity with our Democratic-Republic and the American hallmarks of limited government, ordered liberty, and economic opportunity.

Continuing to celebrate the good America has stood for and the evil it has stood against these 250 years, Must Read Alaska is extending our 76% off sale until the end of July.

Get 76% off any MRAK subscription now until July 31st!

To claim your discount:

  1. Click here to view subscription options
  2. Hit “Join Now” and pick your subscription
  3. Use promo code MRAK76 at checkout!

    God bless America, my home sweet home.

First Steel Cut for Arctic Security Cutters to Homeport in Alaska

Bollinger Shipyards quietly cut steal for the first Arctic Security Cutter (ASC) planned for construction in the U.S. According to a report from the U.S. Naval Institute, Bollinger cut first steal two months before the contract was finalized. The Coast Guard finalized a $2.2 billion contract with Bollinger last week for four ASC hulls as well as a $1.1 billion contract for two ASC hulls to be built in Finland by Rauma Marine Constructions.

The U.S. has funded construction of 11 icebreakers, four of which will be homeported in Alaska. An existing icebreaker named the Storis was commissioned in Juneau on August 10, 2025. The next two icebreakers under construction will be homeported in Kodiak and the fourth will be homeported in Seward.

President of Bollinger Ben Bordelon said that Bollinger cut first steel back in April. “We didn’t have a big ceremony because we were working under an [initial contract] that gave us some ability to start early,” he said. “We did some of that at risk anyway— where we went ahead and decided to focus our efforts, and frankly, dollars and resources on the program sooner than later.”

According to Senator Dan Sullivan, who helped secure funding to build America’s icebreaker fleet, the Coast Guard “is really pushing for speed.” Currently, Russia far outpaces America in icebreaker assets. Building up America’s icebreaker fleet has been a particular focus of the Trump Administration. Recognizing the importance of strengthening our national security, the Coast Guard aims to have all three ships operational in Alaska by the end of 2028, which Sen. Sullivan says is “an aggressive timeline” that he will continue to push.

“Homeporting Arctic Security Cutters in Alaska underscores the United States’ leadership as a maritime power in the Arctic,” said Adm. Kevin E. Lunday, commandant of the Coast Guard. “By strategically positioning these state-of-the-art icebreakers in Alaska, the Coast Guard will maximize our ability to defend our northern border and approaches, while reinforcing America’s maritime dominance in a crucial region of strategic importance.”

According to a product sheet from Canadian designer Seaspan, the Arctic Security Cutters will be Polar Class 4 capable of breaking ice about 4 feet thick, with a range of 12,000 nautical miles and a complement of 85 crewmembers.

1,000 Alaskans Join “America Comes Alive” for Weekend of History Exhibits, Declaration of Independence Readings, and Family-Friendly Fun

This past weekend, nearly 1,000 Alaskans attended the “America Comes Alive” event hosted at Mountain City Church. The event featured over 500 historical artifacts, a reading of the Declaration by Senator Dan Sullivan, a presentation on the Christian roots of the Declaration of Independence by Dr. Forrest Nabors, a sermon by Pastor Rob McCoy of TPUSA Faith, and other family-friendly activities.

The event offered several opportunities to hear the reading of the Declaration of Independence as well as a reading of the Gettysburg Address and Lincoln’s 2nd Inaugural Address.

Additionally, there was a presentation by the McKinley Muzzleloaders, an antique car show, a presentation by the Alaska Veterans Museum, and Civil War Stories told by Dennis Tayman.

The event was held July 4th, 12-6pm, and July 5th at 9am, 11:30am, and 1-6pm.

America 250: Declaration of Independence

2

https://www.podbean.com/media/share/pb-sqzxv-1b04c56

Must Read Alaska’s mission is to be Alaska’s trusted source for news and analysis dedicated to America’s founding principles. 

 

On this 250th anniversary of the Declaration of Independence, please listen along as we read the words that started the longest running experiment in history of self-government. America is great because God is good and as the founders of our nation stated:

 

“And for the support of this Declaration, with a firm reliance on the protection of divine Providence, we mutually pledge to each other our Lives, our Fortunes and our sacred Honor.”

 

 

 

MRAK Subscription Special:

Get 76% off your monthly or annual subscription with code MRAK76

– Monthly = $1.20 month / $12 year

– Annual = $2.40 month / $24 year

 

 

The Developing Brain Under Siege: The Science of Screens’ Impact on Young Brains and the Faith-Wellness Connection

0

The human brain undergoes profound development during childhood and adolescence. The frontal lobe— responsible for executive functions like impulse control, decision-making, planning, emotional regulation, and long-term consequence evaluation— matures last, often not fully until the mid-20s. This developmental gap makes young people particularly susceptible to the dopamine-driven, algorithm-fueled world of unrestricted internet and social media use. Without supervision, constant exposure rewires neural pathways in harmful ways, contributing to rising rates of anxiety, depression, attention disorders, and social dysfunction. 

The available research on overexposure in young people paints a concerning picture. A longitudinal UNC Chapel Hill study tracked adolescents aged 12-13 who habitually checked social media 15 or more times daily. Over three years, MRI scans revealed heightened sensitivity in brain regions handling social rewards and punishments, such as the ventral striatum and prefrontal areas. These teens became more reactive to likes, comments, and exclusion, amplifying emotional volatility during an already turbulent developmental phase. Other research links heavy use to changes in the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex, impairing judgment and self-regulation. The American Psychological Association notes that adolescents’ ventral striatum is hypersensitive to social feedback, unlike the more mature prefrontal cortices of adults. 

We do not have to look far to see negative examples play out in everyday life. A teen girl scrolls Instagram, bombarded by filtered ideals, and develops body dysmorphia, restrictive eating, and plummeting self-esteem. Cyberbullying via Snapchat or TikTok escalates into relentless harassment, pushing vulnerable youth toward self-harm or suicidal ideation. Boys gaming or doom-scrolling for hours neglect schoolwork, sports, and sleep, fostering isolation and irritability. “Fear of missing out” keeps devices bedside, disrupting melatonin production and deepening depression. Excessive use correlates with poor sleep, academic decline, social withdrawal, and increased loneliness— despite the promise of constant “connectivity.” 

The U.S. Surgeon General’s advisory highlights these potential harms: altered emotional regulation, impulse control issues, and heightened sensitivity to social feedback. Spending over three hours daily on social media roughly doubles the risk of anxiety and depression in 12- to 15-year-olds. Systematic reviews associate social networking with psychological distress, particularly among girls and youth already struggling with mental health. 

Recent guidance on healthy limits emphasizes moderation over rigid rules. The American Academy of Pediatrics avoids one-size-fits-all restrictions but stresses high-quality, co-viewed content for young children, recreational limits of under two hours for older kids where possible, and individualized family media plans. Experts recommend tech-free zones (bedrooms, dinner tables), no screens one to two hours before bed, and prioritizing sleep, exercise, and in-person interaction. For ages 2-5, the recommendation is one hour or less of educational content daily; for school-age children, the focus shifts from strict totals to overall balance. 

Parents play a pivotal role as the first educators of their children, and society is increasingly holding parents accountable for their children’s online conduct. Parents must model healthy habits, set clear boundaries, monitor activity, and engage in ongoing conversations about online citizenship. Co-creating family media plans, using parental controls, and fostering open dialogue without judgment all build trust. Unsupervised access is akin to handing a developing driver the keys to a high-speed car without training. Proactive parental involvement protects neural development and teaches discernment. 

Throughout these developmental years, godly virtue and prayer offer profound protection. Cultivating habits of prayer, scripture study, service, and moral discipline strengthens the prefrontal cortex indirectly by building self-control, resilience, and purpose. One Harvard study found that children who prayed or meditated daily were more likely to report higher happiness, greater positivity, and lower rates of depression in young adulthood, along with fewer risky behaviors. Personal prayer correlates negatively with depressive symptoms, offering coping mechanisms rooted in faith rather than fleeting digital validation.  

Virtues like temperance, humility, and charity— instilled through family prayer, church involvement, and sound biblical teaching— counter social media’s vices of envy, vanity, and instant gratification. A child raised in daily prayer learns to seek internal peace from God rather than external validation through likes. This practice forms neural pathways of delayed gratification and emotional stability, shielding against disorder into adulthood. Faith communities provide real belonging, reducing isolation far more effectively than virtual ones ever could. 

Healthy, wholesome alternatives abound: outdoor play, sports, reading, music, family meals, service projects, and creative hobbies. These activities build genuine skills, relationships, and a sense of accomplishment that no algorithm can replicate. Nature walks, board games, gardening, and volunteering foster wonder and connection. Replacing scrolling with prayerful reflection or scripture memorization nurtures the soul, while limiting devices creates space for the contemplative silence essential to frontal lobe maturation. 

In a world of algorithmic exploitation, parents guided by faith can reclaim childhood. By enforcing limits, modeling virtue, and prioritizing prayer, they raise well-adjusted adults resilient to modern pressures. Unrestricted digital immersion risks a generation untethered from reality; godly formation anchors young people in truth, purpose, and enduring mental health. The choice is clear: guard the developing mind with wisdom, boundaries, and divine grace for the sake of a flourishing future. 

Sources

Maza, M.T., Fox, K.A., Kwon, S., et al. “Association of Habitual Checking Behaviors on Social Media With Longitudinal Functional Brain Development.” JAMA Pediatrics, 2023;177(2):160–167. doi:10.1001/jamapediatrics.2022.4924 

U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Office of the Surgeon General. Social Media a..nd Youth Mental Health: The U.S. Surgeon General’s Advisory. 2023. 

American Psychological Association. Health Advisory on Social Media Use in Adolescence. 2023. 

Chen, Y. & VanderWeele, T.J. “Associations of Religious Upbringing With Subsequent Health and Well-Being From Adolescence to Young Adulthood: An Outcome-Wide Analysis.” American Journal of Epidemiology, 2018;187(11):2355–2364. 

American Academy of Pediatrics. Media use guidance (updated recommendations); see also AAP policy statement, “Digital Ecosystems, Children, and Adolescents,” Pediatrics, 2026;157(2). 

Rep. Ruffridge Concerned About Gasline Bill’s Focus on “Maximum Government Take;” Senator Stedman Counters with Concerns About “Aggressive” Tax Cut

Today, July 2, 2026, legislators held a conference committee meeting to continue work on HB 381, a bill to provide a workable tax structure for the Alaska LNG project. At the end of the meeting, Representative Justin Ruffridge (R-Soldotna) and Senator Bert Stedman (R-Sitka) summed up their positions on the bill: Rep. Ruffridge expressed concern that the bill attempts to prioritize the State above Alaskans by seeking “maximum government take;” Senator Stedman counterargued that the bill may provide “too aggressive” a tax cut.

Rep. Ruffridge asks the conference committee to start asking how to structure the bill to best solve Alaskans’ energy needs rather than structuring the bill around the question, “How much can we extract from this project?”

On the other hand, Senator Stedman posits that even “if you take the tax rate to zero, it still doesn’t get this project over the line financially.” Rather than arguing for legislation that helps the economics of the project, Senator Stedman places the financial viability of the project firmly on the developer’s shoulders and argues that HB 381 gives a “significant reduction in the tax burden on this gasline” that may be “a little too aggressive.”

Below are transcripts of Rep. Ruffridge’s and Senator Stedman’s remarks at the end of today’s conference committee meeting. The transcripts were produced using AI and then checked and edited by Must Read Alaska for accuracy and readability.

Rep. Ruffridge: But What Is In the Best Interest of Alaskans?

“I believe that there are some items with this conference committee document that are potentially problematic. I understand that the will of the committee is to adopt it as a work draft and a work draft only. But I think we’re headed down a path where— if you think, Mr. Chair, of just a molecule of gas for example, a molecule of gas in this state, if we are to produce a project, it’s going to go through royalty payment. That’s step number one. It’s going to be taxed for its production.

“It’s going to be taxed for its gas treatment, taxed for its transport, taxed for its export, and then also pay sales tax on its use in the state. And, this working document I think proposes that the company or companies or entities developer attempting to make profit, or, you know, a business opportunity off of the sale or transport or export of that gas are then taxed again by our state and then taxed again by the federal government. And I think Mr. Chair, from my perspective, I think our we should ask ourselves on this committee: Is the working document right now headed in the best interest of Alaskans? Maybe it is. I certainly still have some concerns.

“I think that we’ve been hearing from this committee level that time is critical. We have an open window. I know Alaska’s geographically diverse, and maybe some of that critical element isn’t as pertinent to each of the committee members. The gas line project potentially doesn’t affect each of us the same. But I believe we really don’t have the luxury of waiting to deal with some of these issues further, and I believe we need a plan to utilize our stranded natural gas.

“Cook Inlet production— we’ve heard that over and over and over again is not keeping up. Potentially by 2029, our utilities are going to have to make a decision: Do we burn diesel? (And there’s people at this committee table that know a lot about burning diesel. It’s not ideal.) Or we import natural gas. And these are both negative options. Or we have before us a document that I think, Maybe could help us get down the road, a pace where we can have another option. So I think we have a duty at this table. And I think that duty is something that we’ve all taken seriously to help solve that problem. I worry about a few provisions in this bill right now that maybe go a step too far.

“I think that we’re worried about solving a provision that we’ve been worried about for longer than I’ve served in the Legislature— that’s the S-Corp provision. And we’ve known for decades that our property tax system is unworkable for a project of this magnitude. And we’ve had a chance to do that before; we didn’t take it. We have a chance in front of us to do that now, And I think we don’t need to put additional barriers in front of this thing.

“And I see in this bill additional barriers, and maybe that’s the intention. Is to try to find a fine line that we can draw that brings people together on this, but Mr. Chair, I think we’ve heard over and over that we have to protect the state’s interest. That’s what we’ve heard from the table, And I want to ask the question: What about protecting the interest of our constituents who I think have been worried for quite some time about what the answer is going to be to their energy solutions? And we are seeking maximum government take. I think in here, we have asked the question: How much can we extract from this project?

“And I think we’ve missed the fact that we are asking potentially to put on the line jobs, cheap energy, and potentially a boon to Alaska’s economy in the form of revenue. This project brings forward a significant amount of revenue if it’s built. And I think we might be putting some of those things at risk while we’re asking for reports, while we’re asking to meddle in required local contribution as well as talk about S-corp taxes.”

Senator Stedman: Economic Viability is Developer’s Problem; HB 381 Gives Aggressive Tax Reduction

“I have a little different view. We have a property tax established in 1974 for twenty mills of our oil and gas, and that is a significant tax. And it hasn’t been updated, and it particularly deals with the North Slope. We had eliminated that twenty mill rate for the construction of the gasline during the construction phase several years ago. So, there is no property tax. Now, we’re looking at relinquishing most of that tax on a gasline, but the economics of putting the project forward do not work at twenty mils. You cannot get it over the line. We’re talking about a couple hundred million dollars a year more in debt service.

“So, they need some relief through construction and then after first gas to make their economics work, and that’s what we are talking about here. And then we’re scaling down the old twenty mil rate. We’re scaling that down substantially for the first several years, and then we ratchet it back up as their economics become more favorable.

“We are not changing the severance tax. We’re not changing the corporate income tax. We’re not changing the royalty rates. The gas is taxed at the point of production before it goes into the treatment plant. We’re looking at the treatment plant through tidewater. We’re not looking at upstream.

“So, there is a portion in this bill dealing with a pass-through entity tax that we will be working on the next few weeks. But this is a significant reduction in the tax burden on this gasline— any way you cut it. And some of us are concerned maybe we are a little too aggressive in that direction. But if you take the tax rate to zero, it still doesn’t get this project over the line financially. So, there’s more work to be done by the developer to get this project economic.”

Full Meeting Audio

Listen to the full July 2 conference committee meeting here:

Anchorage Assembly to Consider Assemblyman George Martinez’s Removal After APOC Violations, Lying Under Oath

Today, July 2, 2026, Assembly Members Jared Goecker and Donald Handeland introduced AR 2026-192, a resolution asking the Assembly to initiate removal proceedings of Assembly Member George Marinez in accordance with Anchorage Municipal Code Section 2.70.030 and directing the Municipal Attorney to retain outside counsel to investigate the allegations detailed in their accusation document. The resolution sponsors issued the following statement:

“If these facts don’t warrant an investigation, it’s hard to imagine what would. An elected official was found by APOC to have illegally used campaign funds for personal benefit and gave testimony the Commission found not credible, under oath,” said Assembly Member Goecker. “Since then, additional questions have emerged involving taxpayer funded travel to Puerto Rico and an apparent undisclosed business interest. The public deserves answers, not assumptions, not excuses, but answers. A vote for this resolution is not a declaration of guilt. It’s a declaration that no elected official is above scrutiny when public trust is on the line.”

“Mr. Martinez has already shown serious judgment problems when it comes to travel paid for by others. After giving sworn testimony about travel that the facts do not support, similar concerns involving taxpayer-funded Assembly travel cannot be brushed aside,” said Assembly Member Handeland. “Anchorage residents deserve to know whether this was legitimate municipal business or another example of travel abuse. When you combine that with additional questions about undisclosed business interests, this is no longer one isolated issue. It is a broader pattern that demands a serious investigation and a clear answer for the public.”

The resolution will appear before the Assembly for action at the July 7 Regular Assembly Meeting. The resolution and supporting documents are available online as Item 12.B. on the July 7 agenda.  

To share your thoughts on the resolution, email all Assembly Members at [email protected]

Press release provided by Assemblymembers Goecker and Handeland.

Opinion: Celebrating SCOTUS’s Unanimous Ruling That States May Prohibit Men from Competing on Women’s Athletic Teams; Calling Alaska to Follow Suit

2

By Jim Minnery

On June 30, 2026, the Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS) ruled 6-3 in favor of protecting women’s sports. The decision applied to both Little v. Hecox and West Virginia v. B. P. J..

The Court held 9–0 that under Title IX, states may restrict girls’ athletic teams based on biological sex, and 6–3 that they may do so under the Equal Protection Clause. The dissents from the liberal justices on Equal Protection preview the next wave of litigation coming from Minnesota, California, and Connecticut— specifically, whether the Equal Protection Clause requires states to provide separate teams based on biology. That question will be answered another day, but today we celebrate a victory that felt nearly impossible just seven years ago.

This win reflects the grace of God and the faithful, persistent work of family policy councils and other activists across the country.

Alaska Family Council joined thirty‑seven other family policy councils in signing onto the brief with Rep. Barbara Ehardt and 205 female legislators including multiple Alaska legislators. The brief (linked here) tells the story of countless female athletes whose opportunities were protected by Title IX.

In the majority opinion, Justice Brett Kavanaugh wrote, “These cases concern two of those state laws, from West Virginia and Idaho. The question before the Court is: Under Title IX and the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment, may schools maintain women’s and girls’ sports for biological females? In other words, may schools determine eligibility for women’s and girls’ sports based on biological sex? The answer is yes.”

“A man does not have a legal right to compete against women just because he believes that he is a woman,” Justice Clarence Thomas wrote in a concurring opinion.

Background on the Cases

In Little v. Hecox, Lindsay Hecox argued that Idaho’s Fairness in Women’s Sports Act was unconstitutional. This law requires students to participate in sports consistent with their biological sex as determined at birth. Hecox, a biological male who identifies as a woman, sought to compete on women’s track and cross-country teams. Because of this law, he was prevented from participating. Hecox then filed this lawsuit, and the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals ruled that it was likely to violate the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment, prompting the case to go to SCOTUS.

In West Virginia v. B.P.J., a transgender-identifying middle school student identified only by initials (B.P.J.) is challenging West Virginia’s Save Women’s Sports Act. That case also raises a Title IX claim, alleging that the state law discriminates on the basis of sex in violation of federal civil rights protections.

The Implications of this Decision

In the last several years, 26 states have passed legislation protecting women’s sports. SCOTUS’ ruling protecting Idaho’s law will go a long way in protecting the laws in other states from future litigation. Here in Alaska, because a handful of Republicans continue to give power to the Democrats who are opposed to advancing legislation protecting girls sports, we are without a statute protecting girls from having to compete against boys.

However, Alaska Family Council was at the tip of the spear working closely with the Board of Education and the Alaska School Activities Association to encourage them to pass regulations ensuring biology matters when it comes to athletic competition. They did so soundly and today, girls sports are protected because of these regulations. 

If a conservative Governor is elected and Republicans gain control of the Alaska House or Senate, we might just get a law passed like the other states. It would be a difficult push but it is possible. Even without an allied Legislature, a conservative Governor would control who sits on the Board of Education and would most likely keep the regulations in place. No matter what, we keep pushing for fairness and celebrate common sense lifted up from our nation’s high court.