Wednesday, August 27, 2025
Home Blog Page 274

Robert Seitz: Legislative action still needed to get Cook Inlet gas production increased

By ROBERT SEITZ

I have in the past expressed hope the Alaska Legislature would encourage production of Cook Inlet gas.

I was, however, very disappointed when a legislator could not move forward a bill to reduce royalty payments on Cook Inlet gas because he could find no certainty it would work to increase production.

This much is clear: It can’t work if not passed. Whether or not it would work is not the point, but that it might work is worth a try.  

From Nathaniel Herz article published Aug, 27 in the Alaska Beacon, the results of legislative inaction seem clear: “With time running out before a shortfall in local natural gas production forces Alaska’s urban utilities to import more expensive supplies from outside the state, two small companies say they have reserves that could help fill the gap. But executives from the two privately owned oil companies, BlueCrest Energy and HEX, say they won’t be able to drill wells to access the gas on their state-leased lands without government help.”

The positions that these and other oil and gas producers find themselves is the result of actions of previous administrations in Alaska; of the actions of the  federal regulatory agencies and of the ESG (Environmental, Social, Governance) influence on financial institutions. There needs to be some reversal of the previous actions to get them back to a position they should have been at without interference of outside agencies.

The utilities are setting up to sign contracts and install facilities to receive LNG from a non-Alaskan source which with significantly increase the price of electricity and fuel gas for the foreseeable future.  

Senate Bill 194 and House Bill 223, both of which were introduced, would have temporarily reduced the royalty rates on production of new Cook Inlet Gas.  This is one solution asked for by at least one Cook Inlet gas producer.   

For the legislator who could not move the bill forward because he was not certain it would achieve the desired result, he must think that work in the Legislature is a game and not serious business.  The game of politics can seriously hurt Alaska and Alaskans if the concern for the results in not considered more important than a perceived political posture. Is there a leader in the crowd?  

I have been saying for years that renewable energy will not be able to provide the type of reliability and resilience that is needed for the Railbelt utiiites to ensure the safety and survivability of the citizens of this state that Cook Inlet gas can provide.  

Pumped hydro could have helped if those in charge had worked harder to find a way to make it work, but it seems hopeless if Eklutna Power Plant can’t be kept in production. This is indicative of the seriousness with which Alaska energy is considered.  Paying to import LNG from a foreign source is embarrassing for an energy-rich state.

My investigation shows that Alaska is not warming 2- to 4-times as fast as the rest of the planet. The past 2 or 3 years have brought back some of the more extreme cold that we did not have for a few years during the last decade. The fear of greenhouse gas-caused global warming is proving to be not founded on good science. The extreme weather issues that are promoted so vigoursly in the news appear to be effects of a shifted jet stream, resulting from the recent warming of the Arctic waters. 

The Arctic waters have cooled considerably over the past few years and the subarctic waters are almost back to last-century norms. We need to have our experts research what really is going on and not be so concerned with decarbonization, which may be a useless endeavor.

I worked on the Flour/Northwest natural gas pipeline project in 1978 in Fairbanks. Forty six years later there is still no natural gas flow from the North Slope into Fairbanks. If that much of the gas pipeline had been installed even 30 years ago we would have been able to fuel gas turbine generation in Fairbanks to feed the north end of the Railbelt and would have slowed the rate of consumption of Cook Inlet gas.  Maybe we have been looking at huge projects instead of more realistic projects that would better benefit Alaska. It all goes back to leadership and a long term energy plan, which still does not exist.

Starting today, how long will it take to get actions and policies in place to get that Cook Inlet gas production increase started?  Can we do it by next week? Surely someone can work out a plan on a napkin, like some of the deals for the haul road and TAPS were done.  

Sense the urgency of another cold winter in Alaska and get some desire to make it happen. We have an energy crisis, not a climate crisis. We have an economic crisis, not a climate crisis. Termination dust will be on the surrounding mountains very soon.

Robert Seitz is a professionally licensed electrical engineer and lifelong concerned Alaskan.

Chase Spears: Walz lied about his military service record. This makes him unfit for office.

By CHASE SPEARS | REAL CLEAR WIRE

There is a saying among veterans that we’re hard on one another, but that we’ll circle the wagons when civilian outsiders attack. Perhaps in another time that was truly the rule. If so, such a tradition expired long before my enlistment in the fall of 2003.

Regardless, one rule remains intact for generations of veterans: Lie about your military service record at your own risk. Governor of Minnesota and vice-presidential candidate Tim Walz is learning that lesson. It’s one he should have known long ago as a retired senior noncommissioned officer.

In the Army, the noncommissioned officer (NCO) leads troops directly. Officers command, plan, and make policy. NCOs make it happen. Good NCOs are the repository of common sense in the ranks, the ones who know their troops well. Having worn the rank of Sergeant, and then becoming an officer myself, I often spoke of the importance of officers having NCO supervision. There’s a reason most U.S. Army officers have an enlisted counterpart, wisdom that was baked into the system long ago. They are integral to a healthy balance of leadership in the military setting.

It is against this backdrop that Tim Walz’s behavior stands out in such stark relief to the Creed of the Noncommissioned Officer, which states, “I will not use my grade or position to attain pleasure, profit, or personal safety.”

The problem is not Master Sergeant Walz moving on to a political career as a civilian. He is following in the wake of many who have come before him—all the way back to the nation’s early years. In the U.S., doing time in the military is frequently a catalyst for one’s political ambitions given the favorable view the public has toward the troops. Consider John Glenn: he was recruited to run for senate specifically for being a Marine and an astronaut. The same can be said of Senator Mark Kelly. Though Americans do not often elect veterans as presidents, they routinely elect them to Congress.

Had Walz retired, gone back to civilian life, and been honest about his military record, this discussion would not be happening. Had he spoken of himself as a “retired Master Sergeant, and former Command Sergeant Major of the 1st Battalion, 125th Field Artillery,” that would have been fine.

I retired last year having been selected for promotion to Lieutenant Colonel. But I chose to depart as a Major rather than waiting months for the date of promotion and completing an additional three years to maintain the higher rank in retirement. Walz himself made a deliberate choice not to complete the requirements to remain a Command Sergeant Major and was returned to the rank of Master Sergeant in retirement.

Everyone in the military leaves eventually, one way or another. Originally planning for a 30-year career, I chose to leave at 20 years for reasons of conscience and a desire to be more present with my family, after having served tours in combat zones. It seems Walz timed his retirement out of a desire to avoid combat deployment altogether, despite claims of reenlisting specifically to fight in the Global War on Terrorism. There were plenty of reasons why one would dislike the idea of deploying to Iraq, a war the Bush Administration never should have started.

Having completed the initial requirements that he signed up for, Walz had every legal right to drop out of the Sergeant Majors academy and retire, instead of continuing to lead his battalion. It is fair to debate the associated honor or dishonor of Walz stepping away as a senior leader when his unit needed him and going behind the back of his immediate supervisors to do so. But the fact remains, it was his choice to make as a free citizen. Many others have made the same choice.

But choosing to step down and then create a false war hero identity for political benefit is deserving of the loudest contempt. Walz attempted to cast himself in the likeness of Rambo, but proves to be more of an emasculated, dancing retired Master Sergeant on the political stage.

Once freed of the shackles associated with his military status, Walz falsely branded himself a combatveteran, a claim debunked by the same left-leaning press that’s doing all it can to ensure he and Harris win in November. Every bit as lacking in ethical prowess, the acolytes running Walz’s public relations effort claim that he merely “misspoke.” That is a lie. Veterans know if they served in a designated combat theater and if they carried a weapon in a war zone. These are not distinctions taken lightly. Suggestions otherwise spit in the faces of those who have been on the ground in dangerous places, putting their lives on the line in America’s defense.

One can criticize Walz for his myriad of insane policy choices, a short list of which includes: tampons in boys’ bathrooms, setting up COVID snitch hotlines, letting Minneapolis burn in 2020, joining Minnesota to a list of states that aim to disregard the electoral college, enthusiastic homosexual grooming of children in public schools, and signing legislation that stripped the rights of children who survive an abortion attempt. He deserves condemnation for playing the “military defender of the nation” card while also saying that there is no right to free speech in that pesky Constitution he pledged allegiance to as a soldier.

Walz’s record as an elected official is reprehensible. Even without bringing his time in the National Guard into the conversation, he is unqualified for leadership at any level.

But since he lied about his military service for personal gain repeatedly over the years, it is right to add that to Walz’s long list of actions that render him unfit for political office.

Chase Spears served as a U.S. Army public affairs officer for 20 years, retiring as a Major-Promotable in 2023. Among other pursuits, he enjoys writing about courage, civil-military relations, communication ethics, and policy. Chase holds a Ph.D. in leadership communication from Kansas State University, where his research focused on the political realities of military norms and actions. He can be found on X, LinkedIn, YouTube, and Substack at @drchasespears.

Democrats in charge of ballot access won’t let RFK Jr. off the November ballots, even though it’s August

18

By ELYSE APEL | THE CENTER SQUARE and MUST READ ALASKA

The North Carolina State Board of Elections narrowly voted against a request to remove Robert F. Kennedy Jr. from the ballot, as has been requested. RFK Jr., formerly a Democrat, has suspended his campaign and has attempted to drop from swing state ballots, as he has now endorsed Donald Trump for president.

The board called the last-minute meeting on Thursday to consider removing the We the People party, which nominated Kennedy as its pick for the presidential election.

The meeting was heated, with the board split down party lines. Chairman Alan Hirsch, and members Jeff Carmon and Siobhan Millan, all Democrats, voted against striking Kennedy from the ballot, while Kevin Lewis and Stacy Eggers, both Republicans, voted to approve.

“The statutory deadline of Sept. 6 can’t be ignored just because of the capricious behavior of one party’s candidate, one party, one person,” Millan said in the meeting. “I’m just going to be real blunt and say I think this whole episode has been a farce, and I feel bad for anyone who’s been deceived.”

The decision follows a summer of controversy for the board, which included multiple lawsuits and a federal investigation.

In early July, the We the People party was first denied access to the ballot, a decision that was later reversed on July 16.

Kennedy announced his decision to suspend his presidential campaign on Aug. 23, less than 24 hours after the Democratic National Convention wrapped. In the press conference, he blamed “shadowy DNC operatives” for fighting his campaign’s access to the ballot at every turn in states across the country.

On Wednesday, We the People party officially requested that Kennedy be removed from their ticket in North Carolina.

Democrats on the board cited the “impracticality” of reprinting ballots as a key factor in their decision; mail-in ballots are supposed to be sent out in the state starting Sept. 6 and many counties have begun printing.

“The decision was made for us when the party didn’t remove him weeks ago,” Carmon said.

The Sept. 6 deadline makes North Carolina one of the first states in the nation to send out its ballots.

Kennedy also can’t get off the ballots of Michigan and Wisconsin, also swing states, after Democrat election officials made the decision in those states. The strategy appears to be to split the Trump vote so he cannot win the states electoral college votes. Kennedy has not been taken off of Alaska’s November ballot, where he is listed as a candidate who got onto the ballot via petition.

Alaska will use ranked-choice voting in November. There are seven presidential tickets who will be listed on the Alaska ballot, including Harris/Walz, Trump/Vance, Kennedy/Shanahan, Chase/Mike ter, West/Abdullah, Stein/Ware, and Terry/Broden.

Elyse Apel is an apprentice reporter with The Center Square, covering Georgia and North Carolina. She is a 2024 graduate of Hillsdale College.

Dunleavy stands: GOP governors say they will not comply with Biden-Harris global health control

All Republican governors, including Alaska Gov. Mike Dunleavy, joined together to state that they will not comply with the World Health Organization’s attempt at one global control over health policy.

The Biden-Harris Administration has been participating in negotiations with the World Health Assembly as part of the intergovernmental negotiating body, and the WHO released a second draft of the WHO Pandemic Treaty in October of 2023.

Twenty-six Republican governors signed a letter this week stating, “if adopted, these agreements would seek to elevate the WHO from an advisory body to a global authority in public health. Under the proposed amendments and treaty, the WHO’s Director- General would supposedly gain unilateral power to declare a ‘public health emergency of international concern’ (PHEIC) in member nations, extending beyond pandemics to include a range of perceived emergencies.”

The governors said the WHO could “erode state sovereignty by granting the WHO’s Director- General the authority to dictate responses to a declared PHEIC, stripping elected representatives of their role in setting public health policies and compelling citizens to comply with WHO directives, potentially including mandates regarding medical treatments.”

“Additional concerns arise regarding the establishment of a global surveillance infrastructure and requirements for member states to censor speech related to public health, potentially facilitating the proliferation of biological weapons,” the governors wrote.

“As governors, we affirm that public health policy is a matter reserved for the states, not the federal government, and certainly not international bodies like the WHO. We are committed to resisting any attempts to transfer authority to the WHO over public policy affecting our citizens or any efforts by the WHO to assert such authority over them,” the letter reads.

Read the full letter here.

Young gun: NRCC names Nick Begich to powerhouse campaign-building program

The National Republican Congressional Committee, which endorsed Nick Begich for Congress last week, has now awarded him help through the organization’s 2024 Young Guns program, to help him build out his campaign ahead of the 2024 general election.

“Extreme House Democrats will all be rubber stamps for San Francisco liberal Kamala Harris’ dangerous far-left agenda if elected this November,” said NRCC Chairman Richard Hudson. “Our Young Gun candidates are building winning campaigns that will help grow Republicans’ House majority and ensure the Harris-Biden administration’s destruction of the American dream is reversed.”

The Young Gun program mentors and supports candidates in races across the country and provides them with the necessary tools to run successful, winning campaigns against their Democratic opponents. It’s similar to what the local Alaska Democratic Party does for its candidates through its candidate support program., but at a much bigger scale.

“Alaskans are united in the effort to put our great state first, defend the Alaskan way of life and control our own future. Today’s recognition builds on this momentum,” Nick Begich said. “Together, we will defeat the agenda of the radical left and make Washington D.C. work for every day Alaskans once again.”

The program helps candidates reach specific goals and benchmarks throughout the election cycle to ensure their campaigns are competitive, well-funded, and are able to communicate their messages. The NRCC’s Young Guns program stared in the 2008 election cycle.

The full list of Young Gun candidates include:

Nick Begich (AK-AL)

Caroleene Dobson (AL-02)

Kevin Lincoln (CA-09)

Scott Baugh (CA-47)

Matt Gunderson (CA-49)

Jeff Hurd (CO-03)

Gabe Evans (CO-08)

George Logan (CT-05)

Joe McGraw (IL-17)

Randy Niemeyer (IN-01)

Prasanth Reddy (KS-03)

Austin Theriault (ME-02)

Tom Barrett (MI-07)

Paul Junge (MI-08

Joe Teirab (MN-02)

Laurie Buckhout (NC-01)

Yvette Herrell (NM-02)

John Lee (NV-04)

Alison Esposito (NY-18)

Derek Merrin (OH-09)

Kevin Coughlin (OH-13)

Monique DeSpain (OR-04)

Mike Erickson (OR-06)

Ryan Mackenzie (PA-07)

Rob Bresnahan (PA-08)

Rob Mercuri (PA-17)

Mayra Flores (TX-34)

Derrick Anderson (VA-07)

Joe Kent (WA-03)

Win Gruening: Amid Juneau disaster recovery, attention turns to mitigation of future floods

By WIN GRUENING

By now, most Alaskans have heard of a jökulhlaup, a phenomenon where unstable lakes are formed from retreating glaciers that can result in a glacial outburst. The Mendenhall Glacier in Juneau has created such a lake, Suicide Basin. Hydrologists estimate it contained 14.5 billion gallons of water before it burst on Aug. 5 and flooded nearly 300 homes and hundreds of vehicles in the Mendenhall Valley.

The outpouring of support for flood victims has been heartening. Local volunteers and nonprofits, state agencies, and the National Guard have all pitched in to aid in clean-up and recovery. 

But, as those efforts continue, the calls for action to prevent this from occurring again become more urgent. Hundreds of Juneau homeowners face a dilemma. Why rebuild if their homes will be flooded again next year? The economic consequences of delaying a community-wide solution are unthinkable.

According to the National Weather Service, the likelihood of a similar event next August remains high. Indeed, as serious as this year’s flood was, it happened when the Mendenhall River was relatively low. If the flood had been preceded by heavy rain, raising river water levels, the consequences could have been more disastrous, possibly with loss of life.

At their August 19 meeting, Borough Assembly members listened to gut-wrenching stories from Juneau residents whose homes were flooded. Also discussed were possible preventative actions.

An initial list of conceptual approaches to reduce or eliminate the impact of future floods came with the caveat that they would require further study and regulatory exemptions (possibly even Congressional action) were they to be accomplished on the most optimistic timeline.

Suggestions include:

  • Suicide Basin: Relieve glacial pressure gradually by tunneling underneath Mt. Bullard allowing the basin to drain naturally into Mendenhall Lake. Another option is blasting rock into the basin to decrease the amount of water it holds.
  • Mendenhall RiverIncrease the capacity of Mendenhall River by digging channels along the river and/or dredging the river to increase its depth.
  • Mendenhall Lake: Use the lake as a reservoir to hold potential flood water. This would require dredging the lake, lowering the lake level with pumps, or building levees around the lake to hold more water until it can be safely released gradually.

Some options may be considered fanciful or unworkable. Certainly, the Suicide Basin alternatives should be eliminated because other basins could appear later as the glacier retreats even further.

However, there seems to be less skepticism about other possibilities among local contractors who believe that it is feasible to design a fix in a reasonable amount of time. One of them, Dave Hanna, testified that side channel excavations and levee constructions are common and effective ways of mitigating flood hazards throughout the United States. Furthermore, local expertise and capability for that work exists in Juneau.

Mendenhall Lake levees could be integrated into the trail system now being planned with the proposed large expansion of U.S. Forest Service facilities and improvements at the Mendenhall Glacier.

All these mitigation solutions will be expensive and would require a 35% local match if federal funding can be obtained. However, any federal assistance, including funding, is dependent on FEMA designating this flood as a federal disaster. FEMA officials visiting Juneau this week will evaluate and make that determination. It will require a high level of diplomacy and negotiation skills from city officials to convince them of the need for disaster funding.

Regardless of the plan ultimately chosen or any other possible funding sources, it may not be possible to construct a major project before Juneau faces another flood. Therefore, a two-pronged approach that includes short-term measures should be considered. For instance, raising riverbanks with rip-rap, installing temporary inflatable levees along the lake, and stockpiling sand for community use for sandbags all could be implemented before next August.

Regulatory permitting requirements notwithstanding, the Juneau community has the right to defend itself against any potential natural disaster and should invoke whatever emergency measures are necessary to protect its citizens.

A community task force must begin working on solutions immediately. It cannot rely solely on state or federal help. Local knowledge and expertise need to be included.

Time is critical. The clock is ticking.

After retiring as the senior vice president in charge of business banking for Key Bank in Alaska, Win Gruening became a regular opinion page columnist for the Juneau Empire. He was born and raised in Juneau and graduated from the U.S. Air Force Academy in 1970. He is involved in various local and statewide organizations.

Radical review: Fairbanks school board member calls for ‘civility’ after he crashed opponent’s event and was escorted out

Fairbanks North Star School Board member Bobby Burgess, husband of radial leftist Kristen Schupp, shared a post on social media calling for civility and asked all elected officials to decry the “lack of decorum,” at recent Fairbanks North Star Borough Assembly meetings.

He included a link to an article in the Fairbanks Daily News Miner, which discussed the lack of decorum at recent Assembly meetings that focused on a resolution that would have created mail-in elections in Fairbanks. 

The irony was deep.

This call for civility from Burgess comes after Aug. 6, when Burgess drove all the way to Two Rivers to an event held by Republican Rep. Frank Tomascewski, candidate for State House 34.

Burgess, a supporter of Tomascewski’s radical opponent, tried to goad Tomascewski and yelled loudly at the representative. Burgess eventually was escorted out of the venue by several attendees from Two Rivers. 

Around the same time Burgess was calling for civility, his wife, Kristen Schupp, posing as “Erin Kae” on social media, was stating that North Pole small businessman Keith Fons was a “dumbass.”  Fons had called out Schupp for name calling on social media through a pseudonym, “Erin Kae.”

Kristen Erin Schupp, on social media.

Indeed, Schupp’s official voter record lists her as Kristen Erin Schupp.

Schupp repeatedly engages in name calling on social media. She also had crashed Republican women events and has tried to to disrupt meetings of the Republican women in Fairbanks. 

Schupp is a major contributor of thousands of dollars to the Senate campaign of Savannah Fletcher; so is Bobby Burgess.

If Burgess is interested in civility, the newspaper editorial that he cited had some advice that might fit. It’s behind the paywall, but here’s an excerpt:

“Elected officials, like anyone else, deserve a baseline level of respect. When public forums are dominated by hostility, fewer people are willing to step up and participate in civic life. Stop and ask yourself: If you were on the receiving end of endless emails telling you to be fruitful and to go multiply with oneself, would you run for public office? The public sphere has become a toxic battleground of insults and personal attacks, egged on by the anonymity of social media which only serves to inflate one’s ego.

“To be clear, this is not to say that elected officials should be immune from criticism. Holding public figures accountable is a vital aspect of a healthy electorate. There is a significant difference, however, between constructive criticism and hostile attacks that leave public officials fearing for their wellbeing. It is entirely possible to disagree with someone’s policies and decisions without resorting to demeaning behavior. The focus should be on engaging with ideas and actions, not attacking people personally.

“So, how can we express our frustrations and disagreements without descending into hostility? First, we need to cultivate a culture of respect and empathy in our discourse. This means recognizing that behind every policy and political stance is a person with their own experiences, beliefs and motivations. Before launching an attack, consider whether your criticism addresses the issue at hand or if it’s merely a personal attack in disguise.

“Second, we should encourage open dialogue and debate grounded in facts and reason. Constructive criticism can be powerful when it’s focused on policy rather than personality. This approach opens the door for discussion and compromise — things that make good government work.

“Lastly, lead by example, both in public and private spheres. This means fostering environments where different perspectives can be expressed respectfully. It means encouraging others, especially younger generations, to engage in civic life with a mindset of collaboration rather than confrontation.”

The editorial cited statements made by Fons, who was not at the meetings involving the question of mail-in voting, referenced by the newspaper.

An example of the type of post that Fons has made on social media critical of Burgess and Schupp:

While some people, such as David Leslie, live tweet assembly meetings on the left in a ribald fashion, Fons sometimes does so on Facebook from a conservative lens. No one, including the newspaper, appears to want to censor Leslie. Fons, however, lives in the heads of the Left, rent free.

Members the North Pole community have expressed outrage at how some members of the Assembly treat conservative testifiers. For instance, Some Assembly members continue reading their phones during testimony or get combative and attempt to argue or belittle the members of the public, some of whom drive 45 minutes to attend meetings. This is similar to how Anchorage Assembly Chairman Chris Constant treats members of the public with whom he disagrees.

Missile diversion: More Russian oil tankers avoid Suez, head to Russia’s Arctic, Bering Strait route

With an increase of the risk of Iranian-fueled missile attacks by Houthi terrorists from Yemen, some oil tankers are being diverted away from the Red Sea route that leads to the Suez Canal. According to GCaptain.com, crude oil shipments from Russia via the Arctic Ocean may reach a new high point in coming weeks.

That means residents of Alaska’s Little Diomede, Wales, Brevet Mission, Point Hope, Nome, and other coastal communities may see a few more Russian oil tankers passing through the Bering Strait before freeze-up, as tankers race against winter. Late September is considered to be the lowest ice floe level before winter takes over. There are a few oil tankers that are designed for light ice conditions. The biggest one to ever take the northern route is on its way.

“The largest oil tanker to venture onto Russia’s Northern Sea Route, the 164,565 dwt Prisma, began its icy transit over the weekend bound for Tianjin in China,” the website reported.

Tianjin, Xingang, formerly called the Port of Tanggu, is the largest port in Northern China and serves as the gateway to Beijing. The Suezmax-class vessel Prisma can carry around one million barrels of oil, roughly same volume as the Sounion, which was blown up by Houthis last week in the Red Sea.

The tanker is said to have departed the port of Ust-Luga on Aug. 10, and should complete its trip to China in about 35 days. The Prisma is due there on Sept. 15, which puts it in the Bering Strait within a few days. That, in turn, will probably mean an increase of U.S. Coast Guard patrols.

The shorter-but-icier and possibly stormier transit time compares to 45 days for the Suez Canal route and 55 days for going around the Cape of Good Hope in South Africa. Many other ships are taking the Africa detour due to Houthi terrorists.

Prisma will likely be followed by up to a dozen more Suezmax and Aframax tankers this summer. Just in the past two weeks four Suezmax and Aframax tankers have received permission to travel along the route, including tankers Galaxy and Voyager. They join more than a dozen large carriers who were granted permits earlier this summer,” the website reports.

Rick Whitbeck, Alaska director of Power The Future, said “While the Biden/Harris/Walz team continues to hamstring Alaska’s resource development opportunities, our sworn adversaries, China and Russia, continue to enrich and empower each other. Alaska could be exporting LNG to the Pacific Rim, thwarting the emerging Russia/CCP advantages in the Arctic. Instead, Democrats in power wage a war against American energy and national security.”

Whitbeck called for a change in policy and leadership in Washington. “It shouldn’t be this way. A change in federal leadership is needed. If we get it in November, we’ll see the U.S. reclaim its place as the world’s leading energy provider,” he said.

More details are at this link.

Big endorsement rolls in from Rep. Jim Jordan for Nick Begich for Congress

Rep. Jim Jordan, chairman of the House Judiciary Committee, endorsed Alaskan Nick Begich today for Congress.

“Nick Begich is a proven conservative, a successful businessman, and a passionate advocate for Alaska’s future. In Congress, Nick will be an America First champion. This race is critical to keeping the House and growing the Republican Majority. Now, more than ever, we need principled conservatives in Congress to take on the radical left’s dangerous ideas,” said Jordan, who serves Ohio in Congress.

Begich, who has the endorsement of the House Republican Majority, is taking on Rep. Mary Peltola, the far-left Democrat who now represents Alaska. His list of endorsements continues apace, and includes Speaker Mike Johnson, Rep. Byron Donalds, Rep. Elise Stefanik, Rep. Steve Scalise, Rep. Scott Perry, and Sen. Mike Lee.

Jordan has been one of Donald Trump’s most outspoken allies. He is a founding member of the House Freedom Caucus, which he chaired from 2015 to 2017. The House Freedom Caucus was an early endorser of Begich when he stepped into the race.

Peltola voted against Jordan for speaker in 2023, and voted instead for New York’s Rep. Hakeem Jeffries. She ended up casting 18 votes for Jeffries, who is the leader of the Democrats in Congress.

Jordan has been a fighter, while serving as chair of the Judiciary Committee, investigating social media companies for censoring conservatives and conservative accounts. Recently, Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg sent a letter to Jordan, admitted that the Biden Administration had pressured Facebook and his other properties to censor people who wrote about Covid, if their opinions went against the government party line.

He has been a fighter against the weaponization of the government against everyday Americans.