Tuesday, May 12, 2026
Home Blog Page 1700

Nome Native corporation sues to remove three directors from board

2

Sitnasuak Native Corporation has filed a lawsuit to remove three of its directors for breaking the law.

The legal move is to preserve election integrity, transparency, and the confidence shareholders have in a corporation that has both profit and cultural preservation as its core missions.

The Nome-based corporation says the three breached their fiduciary duties to Sitnasuak and its shareholders when they coordinated and sent anonymous proxy solicitations to corporation shareholders.

If true that would be a violation of Alaska banking and securities law, and is a felony.

The anonymous proxy mailer misinformed Sitnasuak shareholders and damaged the corporation, the lawsuit alleges. It was sent in advance of the June 3 meeting, which failed to reach a quorum and has been rescheduled to Sept. 30 in Anchorage.

The mailer was sent from “SNC Shareholders for Free Speech” to 1,000 shareholders, and did not identify the persons behind the message that backed candidates Barbara Amarok and Helen Bell, and opposed Jason Evans, who was running for his second term. It also gave the readers false and misleading information regarding voting and how the proxy system works, the lawsuit alleges.

Evans is a newspaper publisher of the Homer Tribune, the Arctic Sounder and the Dutch Harbor Fisherman/Bristol Bay Times, and is part of the business group attempting to purchase the Alaska Dispatch News through the newly formed Binkley Company LLC.

One of the three accused of violating the board election process and attempting to remove Evans is Edna Baker, who is a former Division of Elections supervisor.  Until last year, Baker oversaw elections in Western Alaska. She retired from her position prior to the voting fraud scandal that rocked District 40 and swung the election from Rep. Ben Nageak to challenger Dean Westlake.

The other two that Sitnasuak is requesting being removed for colluding on the election mailer are Barbara Amarok and Charles Fagerstrom Jr.  Chuck Fagerstrom Sr., the former president of the corporation, had been released by the corporation earlier.

“Our number one priority is to protect the rights of all shareholders and we cannot do that if our elections are compromised,” said Sitnasuak Chairman Bobby Evans, who is the brother of Jason Evans.  “Today, we must look to the future and work together to protect our shared legacy while strengthening our values.”

The lawyer from Holland & Knight said it was about complying with banking and securities laws: “In order to comply with state securities law, Sitnasuak Native Corporation needed to take appropriate legal actions to protect shareholders’ rights and the integrity of future elections,” said Howard Trickey of the law firm representing Sitnasuak.

The new date for the Sitnasuak annual meeting is Sept. 30. On the agenda is the election of four directors to the board.

Sitnasuak shareholders number more than 2,800 and most originated in Nome and villages in the Bering Strait region of Northwest Alaska.  The are Iñupiaq, Yup’ik and St. Lawrence Island Yupiks. The corporation paid more than $2 million in  economic benefits to shareholders in 2016, including special elder dividends, bereavement benefits, heating fuel and rent discounts, and regular dividends.

Voices of Alaskans are heard in health care reform

GUEST OPINION

By SENATOR DAN SULLIVAN and
CONGRESSMAN DON YOUNG

After the enactment of the Affordable Care Act (ACA), we began to hear stories from Alaska families and small businesses that were experiencing fewer healthcare choices and paying skyrocketing costs for health insurance.

In the past few years, those stories have continued with greater frequency and urgency, including those we have heard from Alaskans this summer.

These are tragic stories of real Alaskans, desperately hurting as a result of the ACA. Somehow, these people’s voices have been lost in the ads recently run in Alaska and in the larger political discussion across the country centered on the ACA. Helping these Alaskans and so many others throughout the state is the reason we have been fighting to repeal and repair the Affordable Care Act, as we promised to do.

To be clear: The specter of tens of thousands of Alaskans getting kicked off Medicaid, as depicted in these ads and related political commentary, was incorrect. We would have not have voted for a final health care reform bill that had this result.

We have been against the ACA from the beginning because we believed that, in the end, it would not deliver affordable, quality care for Alaskans. While it’s true that more Alaskans are now insured, it’s also true that many Alaskans now can’t afford the very limited insurance options that are available to them.

Here are just a few of their stories:

One of our constituents lives in Eagle River. He’s worked hard, makes a good living and is solidly middle class. He’s paying more than $30,000 a year in premiums and his deductible before he receives coverage. We’ve heard versions of his story over and over again.

Another Alaska small business owner is being forced to pay $32,000 a year for coverage. She makes close to $100,000 a year — too much for much of a subsidy. But she’s supporting her disabled husband, and two sons. We’ve heard versions of her story over and over again.

A chiropractor in Soldotna is losing customers because of the high cost of insurance. His predicament is compounded by the $3,000 a month he must pay for insurance for his wife and three children, plus a $6,500 deductible per-person. “We are HURTING!” he wrote.

We’ve heard versions of his story over and over.

Another Alaskan constituent said that she and her husband used to pay $200 a month in premiums for insurance. Now they pay $2,000 a month. “We’re just working class people,” she said. “Obamacare has taken everything from us. It’s the first time in our lives we’re without health insurance because we can’t afford it.”

The promises made by those promoting the ACA — Alaskans would have more choices, keep their doctors and their plans, see their premiums and deductibles decrease — haven’t materialized.

To the contrary, since 2013, premiums in the individual market in Alaska have increased 203 percent. The average premium in Alaska is close to $1,100 a month for a plan to cover just one person. These are the most expensive premiums in the nation by far. These premium spikes have coincided with the number of insurers in Alaska’s individual market falling from five to just one.

Many Alaskans are being subsidized by taxpayers to pay these crushing costs. But many aren’t and are having to pay exorbitant premiums and deductibles or pay a penalty to the federal government for refusing to do so. Indeed, as of 2014, when the numbers were last available, about 23,000 Alaskans either could not afford health insurance under the ACA, or bristled at the individual mandate requiring them to purchase coverage, choosing instead to opt out of coverage altogether and pay a penalty to their own federal government.

Just as people who before couldn’t get insurance because they couldn’t afford the high cost of what was available in the high risk pools, the many Alaskans who receive little to no subsidy and have to pay the full cost, cannot be ignored.

They are our middle class. Our job creators. Our entrepreneurs. They are the backbone of Alaska’s economy which is already struggling through a recession. We cannot afford to lose more middle class Alaskans and we have not, and will not, stop fighting for them.

Although we are the first to admit that we could have done a better job explaining our health care form efforts, Republicans in Congress did have a plan to repeal and repair the ACA — one that we and our staffs had been working on nonstop for months — and one that we were confident would help Alaskan families who are being financially devastated by the ACA while at the same time protecting those Alaskans who became covered under the ACA.

We want to emphasize that the plan would not have pulled the rug out from under anyone in our state, particularly vulnerable Alaskans in our Medicaid population.

Congress’ most recent effort on healthcare, the Better Care Reconciliation Act (BRCA), included the following provisions, many of which we played a key role in ensuring were in the bill, and ones that we will continue to fight for:

— Retaining key ACA protections, including continuous coverage for those with preexisting conditions, allowing dependents to stay on their parents’ insurance plan until they are 26 years old, and continuing to disallow lifetime or yearly caps on coverage.

— Repealing the ACA’s onerous mandates, like the individual and employer mandates, and burdensome taxes, like the so-called “Cadillac tax,” which will further drive up costs and will have an enormous negative impact on the vast majority of health care plans in Alaska.

— Providing more flexibility to Alaska to design its own health care system and bring down premium costs, while supporting such state-based innovations with billions of dollars of federal support, including specific federal funding set-asides for states like Alaska with the highest premiums in the country.

— Establishing a $45 billion fund to help states, like Alaska, that are struggling with mental health and drug addiction epidemics, like opioids and heroin. Alaska would have received tens of millions of dollars from this BRCA provision to help those in recovery.

— Dramatically increasing funding for Community Health Centers throughout the country, 160 of which are in Alaska, constituting 10 percent of America’s community health centers and serving more than 100,000 Alaskans per year.

— Protecting the significant advances made by the Alaska Native health care delivery system, which has been a bright spot for health care in our state.

Finally, the BRCA would have begun the important process of putting our nation’s Medicaid system on a sustainable and equitable path for America and Alaska, protecting our most vulnerable citizens and future generations who need this vital program. We worked for months on this important and complex topic. We were confident that any final health care reform bill would have protected Alaska’s disabled, blind, low income, and expansion populations under Medicaid and would have brought more, not less, Medicaid funding to Alaska.

Unfortunately, the BRCA did not receive majority support in the U.S. Senate and the ability to continue to move forward with these important reforms means that, for the short term at least, the status quo will remain.

But we haven’t given up. Going forward, we will continue to advocate for many of these provisions included in the BCRA. We will also be examining other ways to address the ever-increasing costs of health care in America, including lowering pharmaceutical prices, dis-incentivizing the practice of excessive defensive medicine, instituting medical malpractice reforms, and continuing to focus on our mental health and drug addiction challenges.

We will also continue working with the heads of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services and the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services to encourage them to focus on the specific challenges we have in Alaska, and to bring much needed relief to spiking premium and deductible costs as best we can through the current law and regulations.

We are confident that the granting of Alaska’s 1332 waiver by the Trump administration, the first of its kind and a model for other states, will bring some relief to our citizens with a decrease in premiums in the individual market for the first time in years.

The healthcare debate over the last nine years has been beset by many promises. When advertising the original ACA legislation, Democrats made extensive promises that didn’t come true. Republicans also made a promise to repeal and repair the ACA. As of now, none of these promises have been kept.

Breaking these promises can breed cynicism in the political process, especially in such politically challenging times. Our promise to Alaskans is to continue to work relentlessly for you, educating others about Alaska, listening, and taking input from all sides and then developing legislative proposals to help address Alaska’s unique challenges.

We still believe that the best course for Alaska and our nation is to repeal and repair the ACA. We fear that without serious reforms to our health care system, chaos and uncertainty will continue. Without reforms, our middle class will continue to suffer. Our state will continue to lose workers and our businesses will be forced to pay increasingly higher health care costs and lower wages to their employees.

“There is nothing affordable about my health insurance options.” – long-time Alaskan

“There is nothing affordable about my health insurance options,” one long-time Alaskan wrote. Her monthly premiums in 2016 would have been $1,441, with a $5,250 deductible. She decided to risk being uninsured.

“Those fees, on top of the $300 a month for the necessary thyroid and statin medications I require, have brought me to the point where I will not be able to afford health care.”

She’s 62 years old. Her husband is 70. They own a small business, hire people and pay taxes. He should have retired by now, but he can’t because they need to save up in case something happens to her health. She’s a tough Alaskan, but for her, it’s infuriating, and it’s frightening. “We’re gambling,” she said. “But there are no other options.”

Doing nothing for this Alaskan, and thousands of others in similar dire circumstances, is not an option that should be acceptable to any Alaskan.

Don Young represents Alaska in the U.S. House of Representatives. Dan Sullivan represents Alaska in the U.S. Senate.

Heads and Tails: Millett running for something

WE HAVE A RACE: Rep. Charisse Millett spent several days fishing on the Kenai Peninsula and then finished it off by filing a letter of intent with the Alaska Public Offices Commission. She’s running for something — either her House seat in District 25 or the Senate seat she expects Sen. Kevin Meyer to vacate as he (possibly) runs for lieutenant governor.

Millett is House minority leader and represents somewhat of a swing district. Rep. Chris Birch, District 26, has already filed his letter of intent, and he indicated he’s running for Senate. Pat Higgins, who ran against Millett in 2016 has filed a letter of intent, without indicating what he’s running for — House or Senate.

The awkward part is that Sen. Meyer has not indicated he is actually running for lieutenant governor. He is still considering it.

Millett has been preparing for her run by looking for a replacement for District 25, and word has it that Josh Revak and Millett have been discussing the District 25 race. Revak is an Army veteran, and if you see him, have him call Must Read Alaska.

DISTRICT 23 PRIMARY CONTEST: Republican Connie Dougherty, a hair stylist who lives in District 23, has filed for the House seat currently occupied by Rep. Chris Tuck. She’s a small-business Republican who understands making payroll. Forrest McDonald, also Republican, had filed for the seat earlier, setting up a primary contest.

Also filing today was Indie-Democrat Dan Ortiz, for his Ketchikan seat. He caucuses with the Democrats running the House of Representatives. Gabrielle LeDoux, who is House Rules Chair, filed her candidate registration report for reelection in her District 15 seat. She caucuses with the Democrats running the House.

LeDoux was officially denounced by the Alaska Republican Party earlier this year, although she showed up at the quarterly meeting to fight the divorce proceedings. She can receive no campaign funds or support from the Alaska Republican Party or its subdivisions at this time. However, she’s still officially registered as a Republican. Awkward.

Maybe she doesn’t need the party. She has her own Gabby’s Tuesday PAC, where she scrapes money out of lobbyists’ wallets. It’s legal, because the legislation that would have stopped her behavior got stranded in … wait for it … her Rules committee.

NAME CHANGE POLL: Must Read Alaska ran a poll on Facebook about whether Alaskans want the “Dispatch” name dispatched under the new owners, and the results — not scientific — were overwhelming: 150 said they want the name changed, and 7 indicated it’s fine the way it is.

SPOTTED: At the Tongass Democrats’ picnic this weekend, copies on the tables of the book, “Why Mommy is a Democrat.” It’s for children. Or it might be a satire for adults. And it’s illustrated by a Russian emigre, because Democrats love irony, too. Available from third-party sellers on Amazon.

Academic freedom: License to shill a politically correct doctrine

It was all the rage earlier this year when a UAA art professor painted an image of Donald Trump’s bloodied, severed head and displayed it on campus.

Now, another UAA professor has put pen to paper to call his own university racist, for simply encouraging students to be tolerant.

Professor Eric “EJR” David has something to get off his chest: “White Supremacy is winning in my university.”

His university is the University of Alaska Anchorage.

In the online Huffington Post, psychology professor David takes UAA to the woodshed for a memo sent out campus-wide after the Charlottesville clash last week that left one protestor dead.

The memo from Interim Chancellor Samuel Gingerich encouraged people to be tolerant, to reject hate, and to welcome all. That was the problem: You cannot welcome all in David’s world.

The wording on the memo, Professor David says, is proof that that “white supremacy is winning” at UAA:

“Dear UAA Community,

In light of events in Charlottesville, Virginia, and in the aftermath that is playing out across our nation, we must affirm UAA’s commitment to diversity, tolerance and inclusion, the values that underpin the University’s Diversity Inclusion and Action Plan.

The UAA community must reject hatred and violence, and be a place that is welcoming to all, including those of different races and ethnicities, national origins, sexual orientations, gender identities, religions and cultural backgrounds. While opposing hatred and violence, and the groups that espouse hatred and violence, we must and will honor and encourage tolerance.

We value and celebrate our diverse community. As a campus, as a Cabinet and I, as Chancellor, honor this commitment. This is inherent in our mission: to maintain a campus where all can teach, learn and serve.

I invite you to join me on Sept. 12, from 1-3 p.m. in the Lew Haines Conference Room, Library 307, to learn more about the Diversity Inclusion and Action Plan and how you can help with its implementation.”

The UAA prof is making a living on the grievance industry, paid for via oil dollars that flow into the State treasury. Race-baiting and gender-baiting has become his stock-in-trade.

One of his works-in-progress is titled,  “The Sexist Microaggressions, Experiences and Stress Scale (Sexist MESS): Initial Scale Development and Mental Health Implications.” 

And because this is Must Read Alaska, here are his publications:  “Brown Skin, White Minds: Filipino -/ American Postcolonial Psychology” and the editor of “Internalized Oppression: The Psychology of Marginalized Groups.” He has two upcoming books, “The Psychology of Oppression” (Springer Publishing) and “We Have Not Stopped Trembling Yet” (SUNY Press).

No doubt some of these are required reading for his classes and textbook sales provide him royalties.

The University system received $317 million in state funding for 2017-18, which was $8 million lower than the $325 million it had in 2016-2017. But it’s still a public dollar contribution of more than $15,850 per student enrolled in the system. That’s one third higher than the national average for public universities.

Heads and Tails: Begich wonders what to do with his life; Mallott forgets his manners

WHAT TO DO WITH MARK: While Mark Begich, one-term Democrat senator for Alaska, mulls a run for governor, he has asked his supports what they think. Should he run?

Some of them think he’d be handing the win to the Republican nominee, whomever that is.

Meanwhile, Begich was the “Sold Out!” keynote speaker at the Democrats’ Lee Hamilton Dinner in French Lick, Indiana tonight. It’s a cooperative fundraiser held with the Indiana Democratic Editorial Association. You read that right: There is such a thing.

ALASKANS FOR INTEGRITY, BROUGHT TO YOU BY JIM LOTTSFELDT? A new independent expenditure group has filed its first report with the Alaska Public Offices Commission.

Alaskans for Integrity, spearheaded by Democrat and campaign strategist Jim Lottsfeldt, shows tens of thousands of dollars in contributions from a liberal Massachusetts firm called “Represent.Us.”

The group wants to end closed primaries (like the Alaska Republican Primary), wants progressive voting (ranking of your preferred winners on the ballot), wants to restructure how redistricting is accomplished (their way is best, surely), and a host of other suggestions.

It’s likely some type of voter initiative will be on the 2018 General Election ballot that will swing the state more to the blue side, as that is the ultimate goal.

Lottsfeldt lobbies for unions, for Anchorage Mayor Ethan Berkowitz, and he ran former Sen. Mark Begich’s super-PAC Put Alaska First, which spent tens of thousands of dollars opposing Dan Sullivan, who eventually beat Begich.

BYRON MALLOTT TO CHARGE COMMISSION FOR VOTING DATA: The Presidential Advisory Commission on Election Integrity can have whatever anyone else can have in the voter database.

Any citizen can get the information from the Division of Elections for $21, so the lieutenant governor going to charge the commission the same. And force the commission to file a public records request for it.

LG Mallott seems unaware that Alaska gets more money from the federal taxpayers than any other state on a per capita basis. Total federal spending per capita in Alaska is $17,762.

But political activist David Nees of Anchorage says, “No problem.” He’s already sent the commission the information it asked for — and didn’t charge a penny.

 

CECIL ANDRUS, RIP: Former Interior Secretary Cecil V. Andrus, who managed the lock-up of millions of acres of Alaska land during the Jimmy Carter administration, has died at 85.

He served four terms as Idaho governor. Halfway through his second term, he resigned to become Carter’s secretary of the Interior and he stayed in that role through Carter’s term, which ended in 1981. Andrus ran for governor of Idaho again, and became the first four-term governor of the state, but was also the last Democrat to serve in that position.

Carter signed the Alaska National Interest Lands Conservation Act (ANILCA), making 104 million acres of land unavailable for resource development. Much of the land was set aside as wilderness over the objections of Alaskans, including the late Sen. Ted Stevens and Congressman Don Young.

DISTRICT 10 HAS A ‘D’ CHALLENGER ALREADY, BUT IS SHE? Patricia Faye-Brazel is a lifelong Democrat living in Houston, Alaska. Last year, she filed to run against Rep. David Eastman, who is her opposite politically. Eastman won.

Faye-Brazel is a Bernie Democrat, and in May, 2017 she filed once again for the Wasilla House District 10 seat, for the 2018 race.

Except now on Facebook she says she’s quit the Democrat party because of what happened during the 2016 primary cycle when the party machine engineered a win for Hillary Clinton over Bernie Sanders. Has she become one of Bill Walker’s new nonpartisans?

 

Super-lobbyist Begich? Governor Begich? Publisher Begich? Which will it be?

5


LETTER OF ‘INTENT’

Mark Begich stepped back into the political ring in Alaska. The Democrat and superlobbyist is making a big play — not only for governor, but for Alaska’s largest newspaper.

In the same week when Gov. Bill Walker filed his letter of intent for the governor’s race, Begich filed his own version of a  letter of intent: He sent a dog-whistle email to leading Democrats who might be planning to write checks to Walker’s campaign at Walker’s Sept. 5 fundraiser, warning them off: “I ask you to keep your powder dry,” Begich wrote.

The fundraiser is being held at the home of Walker’s cabinet member and oil adviser John Hendrix. Chances are, all the commissioners and deputy commissioners will attend with their $500 checks, but no Republicans. And now, no Democrats.

Walker is an unaligned candidate once again and earlier this week Democrat Party Chair Casey Steinau cautioned party faithful that the party is still determined to elect a Democrat. Unlike in 2014, when they backed Walker.

[Read: Democrat Party waffles on Walker-Mallott]

PUBLISHER?

At the same time, former Sen. Begich is behind a group of liberal investors putting together a possible bid to purchase the Alaska Dispatch News. These investors are said to have been combing the financials of the Anchorage-based newspaper in a “due diligence” fashion. They are working with a major Democratic fundraiser: Ultra-left, environmentalist, and hedge fund manager Tom Steyer of San Francisco. Steyer contributed more than $87 million exclusively to liberal candidates during the 2016 election cycle. He’s the George Soros of the West Coast.

[Read: The billionaire on a mission to save the planet from Trump]

Whether the Begich group can be successful in bidding on the Alaska Dispatch News will be seen on Sept. 11, the date of the bankruptcy hearing.

The letter that Begich sent to supporters was leaked to the media early today. It asked for help and he mentioned not a word about the deal he is trying to put together with a group of investors to outbid the Binkley Company when the Alaska Dispatch News goes up for auction:

As I travel around the state working on many issues, I have heard from so many of you wondering what is next in my political future. So, I wanted to send this quick update ­ and ask for your help.

First, Deborah and Jacob are doing great. Jacob just started his sophomore year at West High and Deborah is busy running her successful businesses here in Anchorage. We had another great Alaska summer filled with friends, family, and plenty of fish!

As many of you have heard, I love what I am doing now. We are busier than ever at Northern Compass Group solving problems and building businesses for Alaska and I am enjoying the extra time at home with my family.

Meanwhile, it seems the election season has already started for some and so it comes back to the question everyone is asking ­ are you running for Governor? My passion is and always will be public policy and I love working with Alaskans to solve the many challenges we face as a State. Alaska is at a crossroads and you can be sure that no matter where I am I will do my part to help build a stronger, more secure future for all Alaskans.

I wanted to let you know that in response to many urging me to run, I am considering it, but Deborah and I have not made a decision yet. I hope to make a decision and share that with you in the next few months. In the meantime, I ask that you keep your powder dry.

As I think about this decision, I’d love to hear from you. Should I or shouldn’t I run for Governor? Do you think Alaska is on the right path? What are your biggest hopes and concerns for our future?

Mark

Begich has penned two opinion pieces in the Alaska Dispatch News in recent weeks, and has been raising his profile around Alaska “working on many issues.” He has been making a six-figure salary as a superlobbyist, and some observers say he’s happy with his lifestyle, but many who know him say his political aspirations are baked into his DNA.

Pundits contacted Must Read Alaska, saying they are wagering he’ll wait until 2018 wait to get into the governor’s race, and he’ll bring a lot of funds with him, and maybe a compliant liberal-branded newspaper.

Anyone wishing to send Begich advice about whether he should run for office may reach him at [email protected].

This is not what PETA had in mind

1

The People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals rolled out a new Facebook marketing campaign recently: “Shoot Selfies, Not Animals.”

It didn’t go over well for PETA in Alaska.

Dozens of hunters took PETA up on the challenge, using the nonprofit’s frame to show off their most recent kills.

The hashtag was #ShootSelfiesNotAnimals.

PETA framed that spectacular backfire as a victory, however. “As a result, the hunters have introduced PETA and its anti-hunting message to a whole new audience: More than 250,000 people have now used the frame—and the number of people spreading the anti-hunting messageis growing, as PETA saw more than a 50 percent increase in “likes” of its Facebook page from Tuesday to Wednesday,” the organization announced.

“These trigger-happy trolls didn’t realize that they were helping to spread PETA’s message of respect for wildlife,” said PETA Executive Vice President Tracy Reiman. “Supportive messages are pouring in from people who agree that only bullies or cowards get their kicks from gunning down a beautiful wild animal.”

PETA also frowned upon the number of young children posing in the photos, saying that parents who introduce their children to hunting may be creating killers out of them.

“Nearly every serial killer and school shooter first killed animals. PETA encourages parents to teach their children empathy for others by encouraging them to shoot with a camera instead of a gun,” the organization wrote.

WORD OF CAUTION

While it may be fun for hunters to troll PETA with hunting pictures by using their free social media frame, hunters should know that by doing so, they are giving PETA at least some information about them, and it may expose them to harassment by the organization or its supporters.

But more importantly, PETA is not trying to turn hunters into vegans — the organization knows better than that. Instead, it is aiming at non-hunters, trying to convert them into anti-hunters.

An article in Outdoor Life suggests that hunters develop their own social media frames, such as “I Work Hard for my Dinner.” That message might help nonhunters understand them better.

“By flooding Facebook and Instagram with trophy shots, we’re putting thousands of dead animal photos in front of non-hunters who are not asking to view them. If we’re posting these photos just to troll PETA, we’re stripping away the context of the hunt and the whole point of the photo in the first place. Most of the ironic posts using the PETA frame have little or no information about the challenge or ethics of the hunt, the beauty of the landscape and habitat, or all the healthy wild meat those dead critters provided. They are mostly just dead animal photos with text that pokes fun at PETA,” writers Alex Robinson and Natalie Krebs argue.

In other words, it may be that nonhunters don’t really appreciate the humor that hunters are trolling PETA with.

HUNTING SEASON IS ON: EMPEROR GEESE IN SEASON

Hunting season has started in Alaska, with caribou and sheep hunts already under way. Moose season begins in earnest on Sept. 1, and for the first time in three decades, Alaska hunters will be able to hunt for emperor geese, a bird that has seen a rebound in population. Hunters are limited to one each.

Recreational hunts for emperor geese were closed in 1986, and subsistence hunts were cut off in 1987 after an alarming decline in the population.  Now, the number of emperor geese is believed to be more than 100,000, according to the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, but could be as much as 170,000.

The habitat for the emperor geese stretch fron the Aleutian Islands in the winter to the Yukon-Kuskokwim deltas during mating season.

 

Supremes rule on Dividend cut: Legal to veto unless enshrined in constitution

3

The Alaska Permanent Fund Dividend has been calculated in a nonpolitical formula by tradition since the first checks were cut in 1982. The amount of dividends was always tied to the actual performance of the Permanent Fund.

But when Gov. Bill Walker sliced the dividend in half in 2016, he changed the course of Alaska history. The Permanent Fund Dividend can now be used as a blunt political instrument.

The Alaska Supreme Court on Friday upheld Walker’s right to veto the dividend. In a unanimous decision, the court discarded the arguments made by Democrat Sen. Bill Wielechowski, and former Republican Sens. Rick Halford and Clem Tillion, who had sued the governor.

The judges said that the dividend is like any other appropriation in the budget, which makes it subject to veto. Walker set last year’s dividend at $1022, when normally Alaskans would have received more than $2,050, due to the strength of the fund, which is now worth over $60 billion.

The cut took $650 million out of Alaskans’ wallets in 2016 but the dividend was close to the historical average for dividends, which is $1,150.

This year the Legislature did the cut for him, by setting the amount at $1,100. Alaskans who qualify will receive their checks the first week of October.

The argument made by Wielechowski, Halford, and Tillion was that the 1976 constitutional amendment creating the Permanent Fund gave lawmakers constitutional authority to pass laws dedicating use of fund’s income without need for annual appropriations. Therefore, because the dividend is unlike other appropriations, it is not subject to a gubernatorial veto.

But judges said that even if the constitutional amendment gave the legislature dedication powers over the dividend, the matter is part of the normal appropriation and veto processes that govern the budget.

“We conclude that Governor Walker validly exercised his constitutional veto authority when reducing the transfer amount from the earnings reserve to the dividend fund,” the judges wrote.

THE DANGER WITH THE DECISION

Amy Demboski, who hosts a conservative talk show on KVNT, cautioned, “Well, there you have it. Your PFD will forever more be subject to the political whim of the Legislature and governor. The only way to protect it is a constitutional amendment.”

Sen. Mike Dunleavy, a Republican candidate for governor, has been calling for a constitutional amendment for a while, and he left the Senate Republican majority caucus earlier this because he disagreed with his fellow Republicans over their decision to set the dividend lower than it would be if calculated in the traditional method.

“We need to constitutionalize the Permanent Fund Dividend, sooner, rather than later,” he said today. “That was overlooked when they constitutionalized the Permanent Fund. If we don’t do this, the politicians will spend all that money in the blink of an eye. This coming session, like-minded people will need to work together to protect the dividend for future generations.”

The court decision is here.

Democrat Party waffles on Walker-Mallott

The chair of the Alaska Democrats penned a letter to the party faithful on Thursday, and it might have Gov. Bill Walker watching his back.

Alaska Democrat Party Chair Casey Steinau signaled that Democrats may offer up their own candidate for governor after all.

Walker and Lieutenant Governor Byron Mallott have filed as unaffiliated candidates for the 2018 election. That leaves Democrats in a quandary.

Back in 2014, Mallott was chosen by primary voters to advance to the General Election ballot as the Democrat choice for governor.

But right after the primary, the Democrat Party’s State Central Committee rejected Mallott’s win.

The Democrats’ Central Committee moved Mallott down the ballot to the lieutenant governor’s slot, and moved Walker to the top of the ticket. Walker, in exchange, switched from being a Republican to unaffiliated. The resulting marriage of convenience was called the “unity ticket” with the full support of the Alaska Democrat Party and Big Labor. They went on to defeat Republican Gov. Sean Parnell in the General Election.

But that was then. This year, Democrats are considering all the possibilities, including that a big-name Democrat may be planning to run. Steinau wrote to her email list:

Dear Friend,

As you have heard, the Governor and Lt. Governor have announced that they are running for re-election.  While there are questions about what the campaign will look like since they don’t currently have the institutional support of either party, I want to be clear about what is in the best interest of the Alaska Democratic Party and that is continuing to advocate for a progressive agenda for Alaska. 

I know there are individuals considering seeking the Democratic nomination for Governor and we are ten months away from the filing deadline and one year away from the August 2016 primary — an eternity in politics.  The goal of the Democratic Party continues to be to elect Democrats.  Additionally, the stakes in 2018 when it come redistricting (sic) couldn’t be higher.  We must do everything possible to keep a Republican Governor from being elected in 2018.

Sincerely,

Casey Steinau

REPUBLICANS RESPOND

Tuckerman Babcock, chair of the Alaska Republican Party, said the chickens have come home to roost for the Alaska Democrats’ State Central Committee.

“The Democrats’ party leaders can’t decide if their Democrat-elected governor is Democrat enough for them. They’re spinning around in confusion,” he said.

“This is buyer’s remorse,” said Sen. Mike Dunleavy,  the gubernatorial candidate from Wasilla. “They are hedging their bets. We need to put Alaska back on track. The Democratic party has been about causes like saving the whales and tearing down statues. We’re focused on each and every Alaskan having opportunity, each and every Alaskan having a job. The last thing this state needs is a rerun of the last three years.”

“Gov. Walker is a man without a state,” said former Sen. Charlie Huggins, who is weighing a run for the office. “He was once supported by the Democratic Party, which now has decided to go in a different direction than the ‘unity ticket.’ Goodbye Gov. Walker.”

Scott Hawkins, who has an interest in running for governor, had this to say: “Let’s not kid ourselves. Gov. Walker calls himself an ‘Independent,’ but has been governing very much as a Democrat. The real question is, will there be one Democrat in the race for governor, or two?”