Tuesday, July 21, 2026
Home Blog Page 1519

Rep. Zack Fields gunning for Public Safety commissioner

DEMOCRAT POSSE ATTACKS SECOND WOMAN NOMINEE

The House State Affairs Committee was a rough neighborhood for Public Safety Commissioner nominee Amanda Price on Friday.  The Democrat-led committee co-chairman and his posse had come loaded for bear.

The first clue was when Rep. Zack Fields asked Price to go to the unusual measure of swearing herself in under oath before the committee. No commissioner in a confirmation interview has to swear on a Bible. It was a gotcha.

Price demurred taking part in the theater that Fields wanted to create for the cameras. Fields asked her to explain why, and she responded that since no other commissioner designee has ever been asked to do so in Alaska history, she’d take a pass.

Price is the second female commissioner designee that Fields has attacked with an intent to kill her appointment. His first victim was Kelly Tshibaka, commissioner designee of Administration. Tshibaka’s fault was being a Christian, although Fields says he was talking about her beliefs about homosexuality being a disqualifier for employment with the State.

[Read the Zack Fields  ‘I meant homosexuality’ transcript here]

Rep. Adam Wool served as Field’s wingman, and opened the salvos against Price on Friday with a line of questions about how Price’s work with the Walker Administration ended. He was warming her up for the battering to follow.

Price, who had served as Walker’s crime policy and prevention advisor, said that her challenges with the Walker Administration came in part because she was not a proponent of SB 91, the omnibus criminal justice reform package that Walker signed into law.

Amanda Price

Since that law passed, crime has become epidemic and criminals were cycling in and out of jail under the liberalized provisions of the law, which has since been somewhat reined in.

“We were not on the same page with regards to public safety, and several of the proposals that Gov. Walker made to me I vehemently did not support, and so it stopped making sense,” she said, describing her tenure in the Walker Administration as challenging.

Wool’s verbal probing continued, as he said that her concern seemed to be before SB 91 was even signed into law, inferring that she had been too hasty in her judgment of the law. Wool is on record as a proponent of SB 91.

Rep. Fields then piled on: “Ms. Price, did you leave the Walker Administration under your own volition?”

“I’m going to say no,” Price said. “It was clear that it wasn’t working. I had already packed a box in my office and knew that I was going to be leaving. The governor and I had had many challenging conversations. I was not happy there. I don’t think they were happy with me at that time.”

She was let go by Gov. Walker’s Chief of Staff Scott Kendall about three months after Kendall came on board, replacing Jim Whitaker. Price described the conversation in which they agreed it was time for her to go as polite and professional, and that he gave no specific reason for their decision.

Fields challenged her, saying that in another committee she said she left the Walker Administration because of differences over SB 91.

Price said that her statement was not inconsistent, because her role of trying to provide the governor with information from law enforcement professionals she had heard from who were opposed to SB 91 put her in an adversarial position. “It was one of the reasons that I failed to be influential in that administration.”

Fields then brought in what he thought was his big gun.

He asked Price if it was because she didn’t share Walker’s vision or if it was work ethic and other work performance issues.

Price noted that former Deputy Chief of Staff Marcia Davis and former Chief of Staff Whitaker, both prior to Kendall, had both given her positive recommendations.

Fields then asked her if she had ever presented work that was not her own as her own work.

“To the best of my ability to answer that question, no,” she said.

Fields wouldn’t let up. He referred to public records requests by the media “regarding allegations of plagiarism, absenteeism, and misleading members of the Legislature about why you departed the Walker Administration. Are you aware of why the Administration has not complied with the requirements of the Public Record Act and still has not substantively responded to these requests?”

She wasn’t aware of those because she’s not a party to those discussions, she said.

“You were not aware that a member of the governor’s staff had corresponded with at least one member of the media repeatedly stonewalling in response to a public records act request that occurred over two months ago?” Fields asked.

“Rep. Fields, that feels like a very opinionated statement.” she said, adding she was aware of a public request but not about Fields’ list of allegations. The two spoke over each other briefly before Price asked if she’d be allowed to answer his question.

During the public testimony section of the hearing, several people spoke on Price’s behalf.

That’s not enough for Fields, who wants former Chief of Staff Scott Kendall to be brought into the committee to discuss his views of Price. And if he won’t come in, Fields might subpoena him.

Kendall has said he would not discuss a personnel matter with the committee unless Price waived the confidentiality requirement afforded to state employees.

[Read Scott Kendall’s letter to the committee]

Price has said she won’t waive any of her rights.

Fields pressed onward, and asked her about a foreclosure that appears on the court record. Price responded that after her husband was injured in an accident as an Anchorage firefighter, the family experienced financial hardship and their home was foreclosed on.

Price worked for the Muscular Dystrophy Association, the Heart Association, and Standing Together Against Rape. Her grandfather, father, and husband are all in public safety. Members of the committee seemed particularly concerned that she has never worked as a police officer or trooper.

Must Read Alaska has obtained the letter written by Price’s former direct supervisor, Walker’s Deputy Chief of Staff Marcia Davis and the one from former Chief of Staff Jim Whitaker.

Although Kendall’s letter was entered into the committee’s document page online, these letters were not admitted by the committee chairs to be included as part of the record:

DAVIS LETTER:

Dear —

I served as Governor Walker’s deputy chief of staff during the same time period that Jim Whitaker was chief of staff.   I interviewed Amanda Price prior to her hiring as a Policy Analyst and was extremely impressed with her professionalism and commitment to the fight against sexual abuse in our state in her position as Executive Director at STAR.

I was her direct supervisor during her time with Governor Walker.   Amanda was an outstanding worker.  She worked hard, smart and with intense focus.   She was strongly motivated to achieve our policy objectives of reducing sexual assault crimes and she tackled the problem strategically.  She  created alliances with law enforcement at all levels within the state and gained their buy-in to improve the speed of processing sex crime kits.  She helped DOS improve standards and processes at the crime lab to lessen their bottleneck in kit processing.  She did all of the heavy lifting to put together a federal grant application which brought the state over a million dollars to pay to speed up that processing.  

Amanda’s personal and professional ethics were beyond reproach.   I fully support her appointment as DPS commissioner and  know that she will move the Department forward into the 21st century quickly and efficiently.   We citizens are extremely fortunate to have her at the DPS helm.  

WHITAKER LETTER

 

Black Rifles Matter: Buscaglia gets 15 days on the beach

By ART CHANCE
SENIOR CONTRIBUTOR

“Days on the beach” is labor relations slang for somebody being suspended without pay. Alaska Human Rights Commission Director Marti Buscaglia was suspended without pay for 15 days, starting Monday.

[Read: Human Rights Commission to meet on personnel matter]

The seven commissioners might have let Buscaglia cash in personal leave so she had money for the pay period, but if they’re telling us the truth, she lost a couple of weeks of pay.

In the public employment world, 15 days without pay is a big deal. Where you have a statutory or contractual requirement of progressive and corrective discipline, 15 days off without pay means your string has about run out.

If you’ve had a 15-day suspension without pay and you screw up again, not many arbitrators or administrative law judges are going to have much sympathy for you if you get fired.

[Read: Some Rights Matter: Commission retains executive director]

In the Human Rights Commission executive director’s case, the commission has no obligation to observe the progressive and corrective discipline rules since she is not a classified or union employee, but rather an appointive employee. If the commission wanted to, they could do nothing to her or they could dismiss her. It’s not quite that simple, but close.

The Human Rights Commission is an artifact of The Great Society, a series of domestic programs with the goal of total elimination of poverty and racial injustice. The 1964 Legislature took time off from dealing with the Good Friday Earthquake to enact it. It can and has been used to shakedown employers with claims from poverty pimps, but mostly it just exists to provide sinecures for minority supporters of an administration.

So, it isn’t surprising that the holdover appointees from the Walker Administration wouldn’t want to take decisive action against one of their own over the “Black Rifles Matter” event.

Executive Director Buscaglia doesn’t work for the governor; she works for the commission. The commission works for the governor and the members, according to AS 18.80.020, are “appointed by the Governor for staggered terms of five years, and confirmed by the legislature.”

They can be removed for cause, but removal of a Democrat appointee for cause by a Republican governor is usually a fight to the Supreme Court. Why bother with a nothing agency and a nothing appointee? This is one of those things that you just let go.

A phone call will make sure that the plumber whose truck decal offended Buscaglia doesn’t get 86’d from work in the building. And make sure the commissioners understand that what goes around, come around.

Art Chance is a retired Director of Labor Relations for the State of Alaska, formerly of Juneau and now living in Anchorage. He is the author of the book, “Red on Blue, Establishing a Republican Governance,” available at Amazon.

House Finance budget leaves $1,400 for dividends

FINAL NUMBER FROM COMMITTEE IS $700 MILLION LARGER THAN GOVERNOR’S BUDGET

The House Finance Committee completed its work on the State budget on Friday. It goes next to the floor of the House of Representatives for consideration and possible amendments.

Here are some of the highlights, keeping in mind that the budget that the committee was working off of was not the one offered by Gov. Michael Dunleavy for 2020, but was former Gov. Bill Walker’s FY 2019 adjusted budget:

The committee cut $114 million from agency operations and $143 million from statewide items for a total of $257 million total net cuts from the adjusted 2019 budget.

The total state-funded spend in the House Finance proposed budget is $5.3 billion, nearly $700 million more than Dunleavy’s $4.6 billion proposed budget.

[Read: House Finance budget detail]

The only identified source for that level of undesignated general fund spending is the Alaska Permanent Fund dividend, and indeed, the budget approach by the House Finance Committee from the outset was to fund programs first and then calculate dividends for Alaskans based on what is left over.

The plan currently leaves a dividend for eligible Alaskans of about $1,400, which is $1,600 less than Gov. Michael Dunleavy’s $3,000 dividend. Dunleavy has $1.9 for the dividend for the budget.

House Finance cuts include:

  • $13.5 million from the Department of Corrections
  • $72 million from the Department of Health and Human Services
  • $13.8 million from the Department of Transportation
  • $10 million from the University of Alaska system, less than one tenth of what Gov. Michael Dunleavy proposed cutting ($134 million)
  • $2.6 million from the Legislature’s budget
  • $1 million from the Office of the Governor

The current House budget holds steady spending for the Pioneer Homes and the Senior Benefit program, and funds K-12 education for 2021 at $1.324 billion, but does not fund education for 2020.

Why is FY 2020 education not funded? The committee leadership appears to be relying on advice that the 2018 Legislature had already appropriated money for education for 2020 when it forward funded education.

Under AS 14.17.300(b), funds may be expended from the Public Education Fund without further appropriation. The amount in the Public Education Fund appears to come up a bit short, however, at $1.17 billion. Education’s budget was forward funded last year for FY 2020.

The current House budget also increases Public Safety funding by $10 million, and makes no cuts to the Village Public Safety Officer program.

When the budget reaches the House floor, it will once again be the subject of lengthy debate. And the dividend amount will surely be part of that debate.

To be fair, the House Finance Committee did not set a dividend amount, but it also did not say where the money will come from to pay for the budget.

Dunleavy’s proposed budget was built from the ground up and ended up being $1.6 billion less than Walker’s 2020 budget, because it was based on actual revenues. So the House and the governor are working from different budgets.

In total spend, including all funds, the House Finance proposal is $10.2 billion.

Voting in favor of the budget in House Finance were Co-Chairs Tammie Wilson and Neal Foster, Reps. Daniel Ortiz, Bart LeBon, Gary Knopp, Jennifer Johnston, and Andy Josephson.

The Republican minority voted against it: Reps. Cathy Tilton, Kelly Merrick, Ben Carpenter, and Colleen Sullivan-Leonard were all no votes, as they were looking for deeper cuts.

In years past, the Finance Committee has released packets of amendments ahead of the hearing to allow for transparency and for the Administration to review them for technical accuracy. This year, that did not happen.

Another new practice this year is that the Administration’s subject experts were told to not be in the Finance Committee room to help answer questions members may have about implementing a proposed amendment or if funds are available based on the funding source proposed in the amendment.

In years’ past, the Administration was always asked to be in the room to help answer questions.

This was a committee making multi-million dollar decisions without experts in the room. The result may be that there will be a lot of cleanup work to do in the Senate Finance Committee when the budget arrives in that body.

House Finance will meet Monday at 1:30 pm to hear from the Department of Education on a plan for the school bond debt reimbursement program and HB 106. Members will also take up HB 41, shellfish enhancement public testimony.

DOT moving ahead on Cascade Point ferry terminal

ADVANCES S.E. TRANSPORTATION PLAN

The money has been set aside, and the Department of Transportation has the authority to use it.

Now, Must Read Alaska has learned that rather than fight for a road to Katzehin, which is on the other side of Berner’s Bay, DOT has given the go-ahead for the new ferry terminal at Cascade Point and improvements to the short road to reach it.

Juneauites wanting to take the ferry to Haines or Skagway will need to drive 30 miles past the Auke Bay Ferry Terminal to the new terminal at Berners Bay. That 30-mile extra drive will cut two hours off of their travel time. Because of the design of the Alaska Class Ferries, boarding times are less than 20 minutes, rather than the current up-to-two hours.

The $27 million facility and road improvements will serve the new Alaska Class Ferries as they go from there to Haines and Skagway. They can still make those runs within the 12-hour timeframe that is needed to keep costs down.

The project includes 3.24 miles of expanded roadway construction from the end of Glacier Highway (Veterans Highway) at mile 40, Echo Cove, to the beach at Cascade Point.

Goldbelt owns approximately 1,400 acres of land completely surrounding Echo Cove and has worked on developing a marine facility at Cascade Point, which it owns, to transport mine workers across Berners Bay. A terminal at Cascade Point would allow both the day ferries to operate, and serve the Kensington Mine transportation needs.

The solution is far from the Juneau Access Project’s ambitions to cross Berners Bay with a bridge and continue the road to Katzahin, where shuttles could go back and forth from Haines and Skagway. But it does meet some of the Southeast Alaska Transportation Plans goal of not running ferries where there are roads. Right now, the ferry to Haines and Skagway runs parallel to the highway for 30 miles.

The new Cascade Point terminal will also meet the 12-hour rule, which means that workers can go home to their beds at night and not be sleeping on board. This will save substantial costs for the Northern Lynn Canal run, which should be able to do multiple trips a day serving Juneau, Haines and Skagway. The project will shave off eight hours of travel time round trip from Juneau to Haines, for instance, and allow about four trips a day during the summer season.

As for the original road to Katzehin, the 2014 Draft SEIS was released in 2014 for public comment with the East Lynn Canal Highway to Katzehin, and shuttles to Haines and Skagway selected as the preferred alternative under the Parnell Administration.

After the public comment period ended, former Gov. Bill Walker chose the “no-build” alternative in 2016.

Facts not ferry tales

By WIN GRUENING
SENIOR CONTRIBUTOR

In recent “battle of the budget” town hall meetings across the state, there have been few surprises. Budget-cutting resisters really know how to pack a room with emotionally charged testimony. And many people seem determined to “kill the goose that laid the golden egg,”  insisting that Alaska’s largesse-fueled services are not just a benefit but a permanent entitlement.

Many testified, that along with the Permanent Fund Dividend program, generous government services are sacrosanct and, if they were to be reduced, economic dislocation, widespread suffering, even death, would ensue.

Never mind that residents living in Alaska 50 years or more got along just fine before receiving government gifts like the PFD, Medicaid expansion, Pre-K programs, hefty union-negotiated retirements, 1 percent for art, and ferries to any community that asked — just to name a few.

Win Gruening

Anguished testimony about the Alaska Marine Highway System has been particularly intense. The Alaska House Majority shamelessly produced a video featuring a child weeping over the possibility she might never again see her cousins in a neighboring community.

It’s understandable people are upset over potential cuts to our ferry system. Coastal towns in Southeast, Prince William Sound and Southwest Alaska rely on subsidized ferries because of the lack of inexpensive alternatives. But if we ever hope to justify continuing ferry operations, it’s important to recognize why we’re in this fix.

Some testimony compared AMHS to Alaska’s road system saying that “roads don’t make a profit” and reducing ferry service would be like “shutting down the Parks Highway.”  This faulty comparison ignores the fact that 99.5% of Alaska’s vehicular traffic occurs on roads but historically over 80% of the highway operations/maintenance budget is offset by users through gas taxes and other fees.  Ferries move less than 1% of vehicular traffic with only 30% of the cost paid by users.

Yet, total AMHS expenses run about $150 million annually, almost double the cost of maintaining all Alaska’s highways.

Environmental activists and ferry unions have deliberately stalled meaningful road projects that would have made AMHS more efficient and sustainable. In 2000, after ample public process, former governor Tony Knowles rejected the DOT announced Preferred Alternative for a Lynn Canal highway – instead spending almost $70 million on two untested fast-ferries.  Both ferries turned out to be unreliable, gas-guzzling albatrosses that have since been removed from service.

For decades, ferry boosters ignored the reality of decreasing ridership and thwarted commonsense transportation planning.  Alaskans are now saddled with a system rife with inefficiency, runaway operating costs, maintenance issues with aging vessels, and a state subsidy of about $100 million in FY2017.

For every dollar of passenger revenue, the State of Alaska contributes two dollars to keep the ferries afloat.  Now we face more vessel layups, increasingly unaffordable vehicle fares, and service cutbacks.

That’s what happens when emotion and politics inform our decisions.

But it didn’t need to be that way.

George Davidson, former ferry system manager in the 1980’s, describes in his own words why.

“While on the Southeast Conference (SEC) board, I proposed a plan in 1977 to ensure the future of AMHS that SEC endorsed unanimously. The plan eliminated double crews on most vessels by operating mostly shuttle ferries.  A mainline vessel would run north to Ketchikan then on to Juneau and return south.  Shuttle ferries would then run from Juneau and Ketchikan to outlying communities. This “hub and spoke” system, combined with extending roads where possible, promised to greatly improve flexibility and reduce costs.”

Unfortunately, the concept of a sensible, integrated transportation system was never implemented except in a limited way with ferry service between Ketchikan, Prince of Wales Island and Metlakatla.

The Dunleavy administration is clear-eyed about what needs to be done.  Their proposed day-boat shuttle ferry service in northern Lynn Canal will be a welcome enhancement that will improve reliability and reduce costs.

The administration is also analyzing ten other cost-saving “optionsavailable for reshaping the system.”  These include raising rates, privatizing services, dropping or reducing high-cost/low-volume runs, and even selling vessels and facilities to allow municipalities to operate their own service.

Some of these ideas may seem far-fetched and may not be implemented.

But this is where the facts have finally led us.

Win Gruening retired as the senior vice president in charge of business banking for Key Bank in 2012. He was born and raised in Juneau and graduated from the U.S. Air Force Academy in 1970. He is active in community affairs as a 30-plus year member of Juneau Downtown Rotary Club and has been involved in various local and statewide organizations.

 

Lisa, Dan, Don unite on side of cannabis, states’ rights

7

DELEGATION SAYS IT’S ‘HIGH TIME’

U.S. Senators Lisa Murkowski, Dan Sullivan, and Congressman Don Young have added their support for legislation to protect states, like Alaska, that have legalized marijuana.

Sens. Cory Gardner (R-CO) and Elizabeth Warren (D-MA) reintroduced bipartisan legislation, The Strengthening the Tenth Amendment Through Entrusting States Act, to remove the threat of federal intervention and prosecution in states that regulate marijuana use and sales.

Reps. David Joyce (R-OH) and Earl Blumenauer (D-OR) reintroduced the STATES Act in the House.

The bill aims to ensure states’ right to determine how they want to regulate marijuana within their borders.

Murkowski said that the act balances the interests of states that want to regulate pot for recreation or medical uses, and those that do not. “It establishes that stringent state marijuana regulatory regimes, like those which exist in Alaska, have supremacy over federal drug control laws,” she said.

“At the same time, it does not impair the effectiveness of federal marijuana prohibitions in states that have elected not to legalize,” Sen. Murkowski said. “By reinforcing that the states have supremacy when it comes to marijuana regulation, we are eliminating confusion, and more importantly empowering and protecting states’ rights.”

Sullivan called it an urgent matter of states’ rights: “The STATES Act – legislation supported by lawmakers from both sides of the aisle – offers a state-based solution to areas where state and federal marijuana laws are in conflict, including issues relating to production, sale, distribution, and enforcement, and longstanding challenges surrounding banking and the lack of access to financial institutions for marijuana-related businesses.”

Congressman Don Young is the co-chair of the Congressional Cannabis Caucus and has been supporting states’ rights in cannabis policy for years, “and it is high time Congress acts to get the Federal government out of the way,” he said. “Frankly, our archaic laws urgently need to be reformed. I am proud to be cosponsoring the STATES Act because it not only helps defend states’ rights — a central promise of our Constitution — but protects the decision made by my constituents to legalize recreational marijuana in Alaska. As more states continue to reform their cannabis laws, the Federal government must keep up to provide stability to entrepreneurs, financial institutions, patients, and others. I am pleased that Alaska’s Congressional Delegation is now united on this issue, and I pledge to keep working with friends on both sides of the aisle to bring our laws into the future.”

BILL DETAILS

  • Amends the Controlled Substances Act (CSA) so that – as long as states and tribal nations comply with a few basic protections – its provisions no longer apply to any person acting in compliance with State or tribal laws relating to the manufacture, production, possession, distribution, dispensation, administration, or delivery of marijuana.
  • Continues to apply the following federal criminal provisions under the CSA by prohibiting:
    • Endangerment of human life while manufacturing a controlled substance; and
    • Employment of persons under age 18 in marijuana operations.
  • Prohibits the distribution of marijuana at transportation safety facilities such as rest areas and truck stops.
  • Bars the distribution or sale of marijuana to persons under the age of 21 other than for medical purposes.
  • Instructs the Government Accountability Office to conduct a study on the effects of marijuana legalization on traffic safety, including whether states are able to accurately evaluate marijuana impairment, testing standards used by these states, and a detailed assessment of traffic incidents.
  • Addresses financial issues caused by federal prohibition by clearly stating that compliant transactions are not trafficking and do not result in proceeds of an unlawful transaction.
  • Contains common-sense guardrails to ensure that states, territories, and tribal nations regulating marijuana do so in a manner that is safe and respectful of the impacts on their neighbors.

Background: A fact sheet about the legislation is available here, and the full bill text is available here.

 

Rare cockpit footage from an F-22 Raptor over Alaska

Breathtaking footage of the pilot’s view from an F-22 Raptor Stealth Fighter over Joint Base Elmendorf Richardson.

The F-22 Raptor is the Air Force’s newest fighter aircraft that combines stealth, maneuverability, super cruise, and fighting capabilities. It is designed to project air dominance rapidly and at great distances.

 

UA Prez: Time to close UAA teaching programs

11

In a memo to the University of Alaska Board of Regents, President Jim Johnsen says it’s time to close the University of Alaska Anchorage educator preparation programs that lost their accreditation earlier this year. The regents meet on Monday.

“Based on assessment of the review provided by UAA, input from UAS and UAF, and the opinion of the General Counsel regarding the legal risks associated with seeking accreditation and, specifically, the State Board of Education approval process, at the April 8 Board of Regents Meeting, I will recommend the following changes, drawing upon accredited programmatic resources already in place elsewhere in the statewide system:

 

Read President Johnson’s recommendation to the Board of Regents here:

President Johnsen recommendation final 4-1-19

Some rights matter: Human rights commission votes, retains executive director

The Alaska Human Rights Commission board came down on the side of the agency’s executive director, allowing her to keep her job, but requiring a brief suspension and a public apology for her misdeeds.

Marti Buscaglia was the subject of a state investigation because she harassed and subtly threatened an Alaskan over his truck decal, which she decided was “hate speech.” It was, in fact, the truck owner’s commentary on the Second Amendment of the Constitution.

Buscaglia also bullied the truck owner on Facebook, using the State of Alaska’s official Facebook page for the Human Rights Commission.

Many Alaskans have called for the resignation of Buscaglia, because she violated the First Amendment rights of the truck owner, who had parked his vehicle in the Human Rights Commission parking lot, and she abused her authority. Buscaglia put her state-issued business card on his truck and ordered him off the property.

[Read: Human Rights director thought she was regulating ‘hate speech’]

[Read: Human Rights Commission vs. First, Second Amendment]

The vote, Must Read Alaska has learned, was 5-2. Buscaglia’s suspension starts Monday and ends April 26.

Brenton Linegar, the owner of the truck, issued this statement on Friday:

“If A bumper sticker can incite a call to ban one from a parking lot, cost them their livelihood and ostracize them as an outcast. I can only imagine the anger that someone has to be carrying to follow such a path about a total stranger. This is who she is and a slap on the wrist is not going to change her ideology. When she was hired or appointed, she wasn’t even qualified for the job.

“She has lied in the past to get hired and has been fired before. From an internal source, she has been weaponizing this department and she will continue to do so. This cannot be tolerated at this level and is a dangerous precedent to set if she is allowed to continue in this job. She has willingly wasted taxpayer money, willingly infringed on my 1st and 2nd amendment rights, she willingly tried to cost me and my employees their livelihood and ostracize me in a small community.

“She then went on to speak to the press and continue to lie about her intentions. If she wanted to simply have a conversation with me, then a note to that effect could have been left on my windshield.

“Instead, she saw fit to write a different type of note, put my truck on Facebook on the State page and email my client from her state provided email, all the while using the full weight of her title along with her cohort, the chief of parole officers to intimidate me and my client.

“She also did this all on tax payer paid time, taxpayer-provided business cards and so on.

“The Governor was elected to do many things, and one of those things was to get rid of this type of abuse of position and to stop this type of behavior.

“The only way to stop people like this is to get them out of these positions where they can willingly damage others, while pushing their personal agendas and purposefully operate outside of their job scope and directive. This is dangerous and Alaska is watching. The world is watching as this situation has been seen all the way in India. Future voters are watching.”