Saturday, December 27, 2025
Home Blog Page 1449

My story: Heart trouble on a plane

By KEVIN CLARKSON

The last thing I wanted was to draw attention to myself. The idea of causing a fuss weighed on my mind. But, the signs and symptoms were screaming at me. Pain and tightness spread across my chest and upper shoulders and radiated down my left arm, cold sweat formed on my forehead, shortness of breath, indigestion and nausea.

I walked the airplane aisle to the bathroom and splashed water on my face. Didn’t help. I walked back to my seat. Decision time.

“This cannot be happening to me; I’m the guy who runs or walks 3 to 5 miles every day.”

I looked up at the call-button, hesitated — I thought, “We’re only 30 minutes out of Seattle, maybe this will get better.”

But something inside my head said, “Stop fooling yourself.” I reached up and hit the button, an act that likely saved my life.

Because I did, the Alaska Airlines crew was able to identify a nurse on the plane to take my blood pressure — her eyes got really wide when she saw the result — and to call paramedics near SeaTac to come and wait at the gate. The paramedics came on the plane while other passengers stayed seated — a big thanks to everyone for their patience — and I walked out to the gate with them. They performed an EKG, looked at it and said, “Yeah, you’re not going home tonight” and then called medics to transport me to the nearby hospital.

As a result of my decision to risk embarrassment and hit that call button, minutes later when I went into cardiac arrest I had five medics/paramedics standing around me. I remember looking up at them from my back on the floor and realizing what had happened. Those guys saved my life and I owe them my thanks, even if they did cut open my favorite shirt.

I had a myocardial infarction, or, in laymen’s terms, a heart attack. It was caused by a sudden blockage of blood flow in my right coronary artery. Apparently I had a partial blockage due to a buildup of plaque — think cholesterol. It was small enough that I had no prior symptoms and had easily walked my 3 miles that very afternoon before I boarded my flight home. But that small buildup of plaque ruptured and became a full blockage.

I now have two stents in my heart to keep the coronary artery open and I currently get around a little slower. And, sadly, I had to give up my Jolly Ranchers as well as ice cream. But I am alive and feeling very blessed. I celebrated my 60th birthday that very night. On arrival at the operating room the staff kept asking me “How old are you” and I kept answering “What time is it?” This repeated a couple times. I think they thought I was delusional until I finally said, “Look, if it’s after midnight, then I’m 60.” They wished me a happy birthday. What a party.

So what are the lessons to be learned?

Take care of your heart. Get checked regularly by your doctor. Have your blood sugar, cholesterol, and blood pressure checked, and eat healthy; cut back on sugar and consume less carbs and salt. Pay attention to what your body is telling you. Know the symptoms of a heart attack: discomfort, pressure, or heaviness in the chest, arm or below your breastbone; discomfort radiating to the back, jaw, throat or arm; fullness, indigestion, heartburn, or choking feelings; sweating, nausea, vomiting or dizziness; extreme weakness, anxiety or shortness of breath; and rapid or irregular heartbeats.

If you experience these symptoms, don’t worry about making a fuss, let someone know or call for help. Better to experience a little embarrassment than to risk losing your life.

And for goodness sake, remember to smile, lose the frowns, love on your family, spread some happiness, appreciate your friends, and keep your lists and ledgers short — seek and offer forgiveness quickly and often.

Life is fragile and very short. So make it count while you can and enjoy the ride. God bless!

Kevin Clarkson is Alaska’s Attorney General.

Honor Flight takes veterans to DC, brings back memories

The Honor Flight of veterans from World War II, the Korean War and Vietnam conflict visited Washington, D.C. last week, where they were welcomed by Sen. Dan Sullivan.

Among those traveling was former state Sen. Clem Tillion accompanied by his son-in-law, former Rep. Sam Cotten.

Clem Tillion, center, and Sam Cotten to his left, wave flags with 21 other veterans as they take off for the nation’s capital. They returned home on Saturday after five days.

Alaska Airlines and the Last Frontier Honor Flight organization flew them to the nation’s capital in a new patriotic-theme 737-800 aircraft, whose paint job was conceived by a group of the airline’s maintenance technicians.

On the side, an inscription reads: “Honoring those who serve,” and “To those in uniform serving today and to those who have served in the past, we honor you today and every day.”

Arriving in DC, the plane was greeted with a water cannon salute as it pulled up to the gate at the Ronald Reagan Washington National Airport.

The group visited the memorials dedicated to the men and women who have served the nation in uniform during recent wars.

Upon their return, the group stopped in Portland, for an overnight rest, and then continued on the next day to Alaska, where the veterans were greeted at the Ted Stevens International Airport by Gov. Michael Dunleavy.

It’s the first of two Honor Flights that Alaska Airlines will be assisting with this year. The airline has taken part in the program since 2014, when it brought 45 Alaska veterans from World War II to the nation’s capital.

So you want to live off the grid. How about Mount Rich?

A PIECE OF RUGGED, REMOTE PARADISE FOR CHEAP

The Alaska land sales are underway once again. As with most of the land the State of Alaska auctions off, many of the parcels are accessible by bush plane — sometimes — and by snow machine. There are a few parcels along paved or dirt roads, such as the Elliott Highway in the Interior, and near Coffman Cove on Prince of Wales Island.

Perhaps you picture your homestead or cabin at the location above, near Mount Rich, accessed from the historic Iditarod Trail. It’s over 5 acres located 125 miles northwest of Anchorage, 100 miles southeast of McGrath, and situated at the confluence of the South Fork of the Kuskokwim River and Hartman River north of Hellsgate. Minimum bid is $11,000.

[Read all about this parcel at the DNR land sales website]

But it’s buyer beware: These are not all easy places to reach, and building a summer cabin in remote Alaska is not for the faint of heart.

The history of Alaska land sales goes back to Statehood, when outcry auctions were first held, and that practice continued through 1975. In 1977, the state started the homesite program, which allowed Alaskans to develop a parcel into a homesite that they would occupy for a number of years to qualify for a much reduced price on the original parcel. Back-to-the-landers and hippies tried their hand at living the life of the early pioneers, mud, ice, bears included. It was logistically difficult but a few succeeded, and some still have those parcels in their families.

Denise Caldwell wrote about her family’s learn-as-you-go experience proving up land near Talkeetna in a 1985 article in Mother Earth News.

The land lottery program started the next year, with the Department of Natural Resources subdividing land and selling it off by lottery to Alaskans, who were required to attend the lottery sales in person and pay the appraised fair market value if they won.

Although land sales were put on hold during the economic crash of 1988, they resumed in 1999 with sealed-bid auctions and in 2000 with over-the-counter sales of unsold a foreclosed parcels.

This year’s land auction started March 22 for the sealed auction bids, which can be placed through June 28 for over 215 parcels around the state. It’s a sale limited to Alaska residents.

The bids will be opened and winners announced on July 10 beginning at 10 am at the DNR offices in Anchorage. Attendance is not required.

After that, the over-the-counter sales, open to both Alaska and non-Alaska residents, will begin on July 24 at 10 am. Those sales must be done in person or online.

The department also has ongoing over-the-counter sales that can be viewed at this link.

Are we investing in solutions, or just spending more?

By WIN GRUENING
SENIOR CONTRIBUTOR

As deliberations on Alaska’s budget approach the Legislature’s constitutionally mandated deadline — the session’s 121st day — the struggle to maintain full funding for existing programs is ramping up.

In many cases, this struggle comes in the form of emotional pleas to not cut Medicaid, education or fill-in the blank because to do so means we are failing to fulfill government’s “obligation” to be all things to all people.

We are told these expenditures are an “investment” in our future and that, absent such investments, our quality of life and even life itself, is at risk.

Couched in these terms, it is difficult to argue against these claims. After all, we believe, and our state constitution requires, that our students must be educated. And health care is critical to everyone.

But these are not binary decisions. It’s not education or health care (regardless of cost) versus zero education or health care. Decisions about the level of service should fall somewhere in-between.

All investments require expenditures. Could we possibly admit that not every expenditure is an investment?

Win Gruening

In the real world (outside the confines of political la-la land), an investment is an expenditure of funds that promotes a profitable return or an appreciation in value, or both. As wise stewards of our state’s resources, using this definition, if we judged every government program against the amount of money “invested” in it, how many programs would actually qualify as a prudent “investment?”

Most people understand the basic concept of investing and the importance of making good investments.

For instance, according to CNBC calculations, if you had invested $1,000 in Microsoft in 2009, that investment made on April 25, 2009, would be worth nearly $8,000 as of April 25, 2019, for a total return of almost 700 percent.

That’s a measurable outcome.

Admittedly, measuring outcomes of government programs can be difficult — especially in monetary terms. But, are we even trying?

Increasingly, we are asked to “invest” handsomely in pre-K, K-12 education, our university, solving homelessness, reducing crime, drug addiction, ferry systems, etc.

Many of these programs and services produce statistics each year about how many Alaskans are served and how many interactions have transpired. But does this really tell us anything about their effectiveness or whether they are delivering measurable beneficial results?

How many programs and services actually have real performance measurements and, if they do, is anyone paying attention to them?

Let’s take education. Is our “investment” in education helping to grow the knowledge and skills of Alaska students and make them self-sufficient contributing members of our society?

In some schools, the answer is yes.

Yet, Alaska ranks consistently at the bottom in national and state testing. Recently released Alaska statewide math testing (Performance Evaluation for Alaska’s Schools) show 47.5 percent of students performing at grade level in fourth grade but only 29.7 percent are proficient in eighth grade and 22.5 percent in ninth grade.

Over time, educational reform has focused less on academics and more on social and cultural issues that teachers are not equipped to address.

If our sex education classes are any indication, these “non-academic” requirements aren’t very effective either. For almost 20 years, Alaska has ranked among the highest nationally in sexually transmitted diseases statistics. A recent state of Alaska Department of Health and Social Services bulletin indicates STD numbers are continuing to increase — especially in the 15-24-year-old group.

By these objective measurements, the dollars “invested” in education have not been well-spent.

Education advocates insist more money is needed. The latest costly proposal is a statewide pre-K program to prepare our kids for kindergarten.

Why would we expand an ineffective system that has failed to deliver?

We have great teachers who genuinely care for kids and work hard in our schools. But more and more of their time is spent on unnecessary paperwork. The current system doesn’t reward them or allow them to excel. Students are often promoted to the next grade regardless of proficiency level.

The solution to every problem isn’t always spending more money on another program. It’s imperative to establish metrics and priorities and hold the system, parents and students accountable. We need to recognize success, not failure.

Alaskans should expect government dollars to be treated like their personal investments — and, likewise, expect an increase in value.

Win Gruening retired as the senior vice president in charge of business banking for Key Bank in 2012. He was born and raised in Juneau and graduated from the U.S. Air Force Academy in 1970. He is active in community affairs as a 30-plus year member of Juneau Downtown Rotary Club and has been involved in various local and statewide organizations.

Sen. Tom Begich: A legislating and litigating household

As reported in Must Read Alaska last week, Sen. Tom Begich’s wife and the 501(c)(3) nonprofit organization she leads are suing the Dunleavy Administration over what they say are “impounded” funds appropriated for education.

Begich, in the Senate Minority, has little real influence in the upper chamber of the Legislature.

But he makes up for it by having a spouse in Sarah Sledge, who will litigate, win money through the courts for her nonprofit, and use that money to underwrite her organization and support herself and her husband, who brings in far less as a legislator.

The lawsuit she has filed concerns $20 million the Department of Education has not yet released to school districts around the state. Gov. Michael Dunleavy wants to claw those funds back because state government is spending beyond its means.

It’s doubtful he’ll be able to do more than get an A for effort, but he gave it the “old college try.”

It’s also doubtful the lawsuit will proceed, since the Administration has until June 30 to disperse the funds. It could release those funds any day.

Sen. Begich issued a statement in January blasting the governor for cutting the funds. Weeks later, Begich’s wife filed the lawsuit:

Sarah Sledge lawsuit for Coalition for Educational Equity

A BRIDGE TOO FAR IN CONFLICT OF INTEREST?

Having the spouse of a lawmaker suing the governor has raised questions about Sen. Tom Begich’s conflict of interest, how deeply he is still associated with the group for which he lobbied for many years, and whether the Coalition for Educational Equality, is actually primarily a lobbying entity, rather than a 501(c)(3).

The group was formed in the 1990s and was run by Charles Wohlforth in its early years. Its goal is to improve education in rural Alaska. It does this by finding weaknesses in the State’s education funding decisions, suing the state for more money, all the while claiming constitutional issues.

And it wins in court. The coalition was a lead litigant in the Kasayulie case, which was settled by the Parnell Administration and led to several school capital construction projects in rural communities.

The organization won another large case, the Moore Settlement, from the State of Alaska, and was able to keep for itself some $450,000 of the settlement, the rest going to schools and to pay lawyers.

With those hard-won funds, the coalition was to set up an educator capacity building website, which it did with spectacularly dismal results.

The site is not regularly used by educators, according to sources who were promised anonymity by Must Read Alaska.

14.08.04 Moore Settlement Amendment No. 1 – executed 2

The coalition collects membership fees as well. Those fees are paid for by school districts; they are recycled public dollars.

In fact, 95 percent of the funds that the organization gets are public dollars in one form or another, and it uses those dollars primarily to sue for more tax dollars for rural schools.

What rural legislators aren’t achieving in appropriations for rural school districts, the Coalition for Education Equity will.

As for Begich, as late as October, 2016, he was that group’s government relations director. Then, Begich won his race for Senate to fill the seat vacated by former Sen. Johnny Ellis. He was sworn in in January, 2017. He’s on the Education Committee.

Sarah Sledge reported to the IRS that only 10 percent of her time was spent on lobbying the Legislature.

Now that her husband is in elected office, it’s a poorly kept secret in the Capitol that Sledge uses Begich’s Room 11 office as her own, and also bunks for free with her husband-senator during her time lobbying in Juneau. This close economic association is only partially listed on his financial disclosure filings with the Alaska Public Offices Commission. By reading the disclosure, the public has no idea just how financially linked Begich and the Coalition for Education Equity really are.

Read: Coalition for Educational Equity Tax Returns

FOLLOW THE MONEY

The salaries for Sledge and her employee total $149,000, exceeding the public money received in the most recent IRS filing, which showed $141,000. Membership dues and assessments bring in another $170,000 — this is State money going to rural school districts, and funneled back to the coalition in dues to sue for more money.

In a state like Alaska, it’s common for husbands and wives to have work roles that overlap, but when it comes to conflicts of interest, there’s no power couple that more deeply defines the problem than Tom Begich and Sarah Sledge.

Begich blasts away from one side: In his February newsletter, he discussed the education legislation he is sponsoring, writing a thesis on the constitutional mandate of providing an education to Alaska’s youth.

He wrote, “That is also why I will do everything in my power to stop the $20 million in cuts Governor Dunleavy proposed in his FY 19 Supplemental Budget, $20 million the Legislature promised to school districts last year.”

Sledge sues from the other side: In her lawsuit, she inventoried “the executive branch’s failure to dutifully execute the law of the State of Alaska by ‘impounding’ appropriated funds has caused and will cause harm to Alaska school children and impairs the ability of Alaska school districts to provide the system of public education mandated by Article VII, section 1 of the Alaska Constitution.”

Is this the kind of conflict of interest that legislators were trying to prevent when they passed the anti-corruption legislation HB 44? Or was HB 44 only designed to discourage those with ties to resource extraction industries from running for public office?

Is Eagle River ready for a divorce?

By DONN LISTON
CONTRIBUTOR

While many residents of the Railbelt from Eagle River to Eklutna were enjoying a cold one in their taxed-to-the-max Municipality of Anchorage home on Friday, other locals gathered at Lion’s Park Clubhouse to talk about quality of life — with and without Muni.org.

Happy folks who obviously knew and respected each other were sharing free pizza and water or coffee and talking about Eagle River detaching from the Municipality of Anchorage. Some 400 have already taken an on-line survey to express interest in the topic and they were ready to learn more about Eaglexit.

Kind of like a thinking about a divorce while you can still talk to each other.

Following a Powerpoint presentation by Michael Tavoliero, former Anchorage Assembly member Dan Kendall reported on his experiences dealing with the Muni in various positions regarding a number of issues.

One guest speaker expressed surprise at how many people filled the room.

“When they asked me to talk about the requirements to detach from the Municipality of Anchorage and form your own local government, I thought it might be a handful of people, as is typically the case,” said Edgar Blatchford, a former commissioner of two state departments dealing with local government and economic development.

“Our constitution was written to encourage government decision-making at the level closest to the people so this is an appropriate discussion,” he said. Blatchford teaches at the University of Alaska.

Has the Anchorage Municipality become too unwieldy to address the needs of JBER, Eagle River, Chugiak, Birchwood, Peters Creek, and all points north to Eklutna?

Muni District 2 does not align directly with legislative districts of this area. Rather, those who live in the area elect two Anchorage assembly members through mail-in ballots on an election date that is not aligned with any other government election time. Five other Anchorage election districts also have two people each on the Assembly.

Anchorage School Board members are elected at-large.

District 2 Assemblyman Fred Dyson wasn’t in attendance, but newly elected Assemblywoman Crystal Kennedy was.

Organizers who have put time and some personal resources into the Eaglexit effort are Michael Tavoliero, Matthew Hickey, Gordon Banfield, Thomas Williams, Wayne DeVore, Benjamin Westveer, and Kimberly Collins. They say the pump has been primed and now they need to know if we need a garden hose or a fire hose.

According to the organizers, the District 2 population is approximately 50,000. By detaching from the Municipality of Anchorage, District 2 would become the second most populous municipality in Alaska. The City of Fairbanks, for comparison, has 35,000 people.

These are local people who want more say in local government decisions impacting their own neighborhoods. Their mission is to discover the social, political, and financial costs associated with the development of a municipality (city or borough). Anyone who ever thought they might like to become active in politics could learn a lot by getting involved.

Is this feasible? Didn’t Eagle River pull out of the Muni before and was it not sent back into it tail-between-its-legs by a judge? Who will pay for this new effort?

A 2007 Anchorage commissioned study of detaching this part of Anchorage found that the MOA will experience little to no significant economic hardship as a result of detachment and that there may even be a reduction in costs for the Muni. This is because some budget categories for 300,000 people will likely not be shared with a municipality of 50,000.

This region has some resources the Muni.org depends on, too. The Eklutna Lake water reservoir, the landfill, Chugach State Park access, a prison, and a variety of amenities people in Anchorage visit.

Here are the detachment talking points as described in a white paper written by the Eaglexit board:

“Smaller is Better,” an Eaglexit would:

  • Provide improved local involvement and control of land-use.
  • Maintain and operate a smaller and more accountable school district.
  • Allow for a locally controlled public safety sector.
  • Protect community tax base through a smaller taxing district and greater local community involvement in tax decisions.
  • Limit government to local constituency enabling home-grown representation of the people and creating collaboration between citizens and elected officials.
  • Mitigate over-zoning, excessive fees, high density housing, parking, traffic and unnecessary services.
  • Simplify the permitting process.
  • Eliminate unnecessary taxes.
  • Attract small business.
  • Promote a general scaling back of nonessential government functions.
  • Establish shared interest between business interests based on common philosophies toward matters such as low taxes, fewer regulations and expanding economic growth.
  • Produce an effective and responsive small municipal government.

How many checkmarks can residents of this area put on that list?

This isn’t about that tired and trite idea of “starting a conversation.” This is about people who have had enough, and are ready to take action to address a dysfunctional relationship.

Tavoliero estimates it will cost a million dollars, and require a lot of involvement by people who live in this region, because the best part of living here is it isn’t really Anchorage.

Donn Liston has lived in Alaska since 1962 and in Eagle River since 2010. He was a reporter for the Anchorage Daily News during pipeline construction and is a retired teacher. He was named a BP Teacher of Excellence in 2013.

Anchorage homicides by the number: 14 so far this year

Anchorage is gaining on the record-setting homicide year of 2017. After a slight reprieve in violent deaths in 2018, the numbers are on the rise again in Alaska’s largest city, already considered one of the more crime-ridden municipalities in the country. Police have made arrests in seven of the homicides; one of the deaths was believed to be a murder-suicide. .The first on the list below was deemed to be a negligent manslaughter, through mishandling of a hand gun

HOMICIDES IN ANCHORAGE IN 2019

  • Jan. 22, 12:33 am, at the 1200 block of LaTouche Ave. Victim: Omar Mandour. (Later classified as negligent manslaughter, shooting death.)
  1. Jan. 24, 12 pm, at 600 block of West 34th. Victim: Steven John, 36. Body trauma.
  2. Feb. 3, 2:01 am at 5900 block of East Sixth Avenue: Victims: Danny Smalley, 61, and Brenda Smalley, 46, murder-suicide.
  3. Feb. 4, 11:03 pm on East 12th, Victim: Salisa Loucks, 30. Shooting.
  4. Feb. 16, 8:53 pm, 46th and Spenard. Victim: Javon Diggs, 40. Shooting.
  5. Feb. 17, 12:12 pm, 1300 block West 36th, Ryan Cannon, 31, body trauma.
  6. March 7, 5:23 am, 1000 block of West 26th. Victim: Katelyn Sours, 22, body trauma, domestic violence.
  7. March 13, 6:42 pm, Point Woronzof, Victim: 3-year-old girl stabbed to death by her mother.
  8. March 30: 11:55 pm at 300 block of Oklahoma Street. Victim: Tion Price, 19. Shooting.
  9. April 1, 5:42 pm at West 16th at A Street. Victim: Tony Susook, 27. Body trauma.
  10. April 7, 2:08 am, 5100 block of Strawberry Road, Katherine Schmidt, suspicious house fire.
  11. April 8, 10:40 pm on Taku Drive. Victim: Navarrow Andrews, 23. Shooting.
  12. April 26, 4:29 pm at 1000 block of East Third. Victim: Veronique Long, 59. Intentionally run over by vehicle.
  13. April 28, 10:12 pm on East 20th. Victim: Laron Roberts, 36. Shooting.
  14. May 3, 1:30 am, on Debarr near Patterson. Victim: Not identified yet. Body trauma.

HOMICIDES: HOW THEY COMPARE WITH RECENT YEARS

  • 2016: 34, or 2.8 per month
  • 2017: 35, or 2.9 per month
  • 2018: 28, or 2.3 per month
  • 2019: 14 as of May 3, or 3.5 per month

OFFICER SHOOTINGS

  1. April 1, 1:13 am at 31st and A Street, Bishar Hassan, 31, shot by police after pointing gun (turned out to be BB gun).
  2. March 7, 2:11 am, Columbine Street, officers shot prowler Dylan Aikey, 23, who shot at officers first.

Legislature now in 24-hour rule mode

After the House vote on the Senate budget today, and when the Senate appoints its members to the conference committee on Monday, the “24-hour rule” will be in effect.

Hearings on remaining bills relating to crime, the Permanent Fund dividend, and constitutional amendments, can be scheduled with just 24 hours notice, as the House and Senate rush to complete their business.

While this makes if harder to follow the legislative process, you can always track your legislation of interest by using the Bill Tracking Management Facility and set notifications that can be sent to your email when bills are moving.

The House floor session will gavel in at 11 am Monday and the Senate will gavel in at 2 pm. The budget conference committee is expected to begin its negotiations on Tuesday.

Locomotive 557 will ride again

By ART CHANCE
SENIOR CONTRIBUTOR

One of my very earliest memories is sitting on my grandfather’s shoulders watching the departure of a Wadley Southern steam locomotive and train from Swainsboro to Wadley, Georgia in 1953 or ’54.

I was only four or five and it was probably the most impressive thing I’d ever seen.

The Wadley Southern was about a 20-mile rail link between Swainsboro and Wadley, which was on the mainline of the Central of Georgia Railroad; it was the link to the world if you lived in rural Southeast Georgia.

The Wadley Southern hauled some general freight, especially fertilizer, cement, livestock, and other bulk commodities from the mainline to the industries and businesses on its route, and it hauled bulk timber, pulp wood and some finished lumber back to the mainline along with a few passengers to catch the Central’s “Nancy Hanks” passenger train to Savannah, Atlanta, and the world.

And, yes, it was the South in the 1950s, and the passenger car on the Wadley Southern was what is known as a Jim Crow car, a combination coach and baggage car that had a front and rear passenger compartment separated by a baggage, and sometimes mail, compartment. The whites had one passenger compartment and the blacks had the other.

Leaving out uniquely Southern things like Jim Crow cars, most shortline railroads ran pretty much like the Wadley Southern in the days of small towns and steam locomotives.

In the days of steam, the Alaska Railroad hauled general freight to individual customers all along its route. I don’t know when the last time that siding that goes to Alaska Mill and Feed was used, but it was the typical operation of a local train; bringing a load of feed or fertilizer to some “feed and seed” store in a small town.

During World War II, the Alaska Railroad became a military railroad in all but name. Military railroads had standard design locomotives for use all over the world; track widths varied, bridge loads varied, tunnel clearances varied, fuel availability varied, but the U.S/ came up with standardized locomotives that could be easily adapted to local conditions.

The most common locomotive was the S-160, a “Consolidation” or “2-8-0” locomotive. The 2-8-0 wheel arrangement for steam freight locomotives was perhaps the most common freight locomotive in the U.S. and gave good power as well as the ability to handle tight curves and poor trackage.

The U.S. sent thousands of them around the world and 12 of them to Alaska. The Alaska Railroad’s S-160s were the mainstay of railroad’s power through the war and thereafter until the diesel revolution began in the late 1940s.   The diesel locomotive had been supplanting the steam locomotive even before Word War II, but the production capability was in place to produce and maintain steam locomotives, so the US railway system remained almost entirely steam powered through the war.

With the end of the war and the end of government control, the railroads abandoned their by now largely worn out steam locomotives as quickly as they could.

Even after it dieselized in the early 1950s, the Alaska Railroad kept a few steam locomotives on its roster because of annual flooding between Nenana and Fairbanks. The electric traction motors of diesel-electric locomotives didn’t handle submersion in water very well, so the steam locomotives were kept around to get through the spring floods. By the early 1960s, the steam locomotives were no longer thought necessary and the railroad disposed of them.

The last was Locomotive 557, which was sold to a collector and museum operator in Washington. While 557 was not kept in operable condition, she was well cared-for and remained in good condition.  A few years ago, a group of Alaskans had the opportunity to bring her home.

With the help of the Alaska Railroad and many generous benefactors, the 557 is installed in an “engine house” in Wasilla and is being restored for operation.  Almost all work other than certain professional consultation is being done by volunteer labor.   Everything on her is being paid for by private or foundation/philanthropic donations — she’s no welfare queen.

The U.S. bought her from the American Locomotive Works in 1943 for $50,000. When she moves under her own power again, some millions will have been invested, even if all the labor is volunteer. I bought the “number 3 flue” in her firebox.

Those of us who don’t change our spark plugs, oil, or tires anymore don’t really have any comprehension of what it takes to work on machines like the 557.  The tools to work on them don’t exist anymore, so you have to salvage and repair them or make them from scratch.

Fortunately, there are still some guys around who know how to use a metal lathe and can machine a tapered bolt that can stand 800 foot pounds of torque. For reference, if you’ve ever changed a tire, tightening the lug nuts is about 80-100 foot pounds. The guys restoring the 557 had to make the sockets to attach to the wrench to tighten those bolts.

Everything has to be made using skills that hardly exist in America today and are mostly possessed by guys, yes, guys, who have gray hair and sometimes curmudgeonly attitudes towards people who don’t understand their work and their world.

In a couple of years the last steam locomotive of the Alaska Railroad will be the first to operate again. I can’t wait to ride behind her to Seward; we don’t have the amazing wooden climb anymore but even the switchbacks are pretty impressive.

The modern Alaska Railroad diesels have 5,000 horsepower, and Locomotive 557 has maybe 1,500, but she can lug a decent sized passenger train over that hill even if she has to do it one cylinder stroke at a time.

That is the drama of steam locomotives. Those of us of a certain age remember the “little engine that could,” and “I think I can, I think I can;” those are the rhythms of the cylinders of a steam locomotive; one cylinder stroke at the time as it forces itself up the grade.

Art Chance is a retired Director of Labor Relations for the State of Alaska, formerly of Juneau and now living in Anchorage. He is the author of the book, “Red on Blue, Establishing a Republican Governance,” available at Amazon.