Monday, April 6, 2026
Home Blog Page 1264

Fueled with hate for Trump, Lincoln Project backs Gross with big bucks for Senate

24

HERE COMES THE OUTSIDE MONEY; NEARLY HALF MILLION FOR GROSS

The Lincoln Project, a partisan group that has been called a group of “grifters” dedicated to defeating Republicans, has suddenly decided to back Al Gross for Senate. Gross is running on the Democrats’ ticket against Sen. Dan Sullivan, who has served as one of Alaska’s senators for the past six years.

The group has signaled its intent to play in Alaska’s Senate race by making its initial advertising buy to start running TV ads this week on Gross’ behalf. The Lincoln Project intends to spend $482,000 for TV in Alaska in campaigning on behalf of Gross; it is not allowed to coordinate with his campaign, however.

Gross’s actual campaign has also made a TV buy, to spend more than $800,000 on television ads that will start in September. He is already running ads that refer to Gross as a “renowned orthopedic surgeon.”

This Gross ad buy signals to the national Democrat groups to let them know where he is spending his money — which is mostly in the Fairbanks TV market. And that means the Lincoln Project and other Democrat surrogate groups will take the clue, and run with their efforts in the Anchorage television market, where most of the votes are.

What it all adds up to is that National Democrat groups are here in Alaska now. They’re aiding a candidate who has gained no real ground here. But the media markets are cheap, at least, and they will have an impact down the ballot for the Senate and House races.

The group formed up originally to defeat President Donald Trump but has since branched out to defeat supporters of the president in the U.S. Senate and other Republicans they see as vulnerable.

The group has raised more than $16.8 million and has about 30 employees, according to the Washington Post.

Last week, the Lincoln Project tweeted out Gross’ name and drew tens of thousands of new national followers to Gross’ Twitter account. Presumably that will lead to fundraising for Gross, who has already raised significant funds from national Democrats through the Democrats’ online tool, ActBlue.

Senator Sullivan has a $2 million cash-in-hand advantage and runs on a strong record of success on Alaska priorities. Even Democrat-favored pollster Ivan Moore has Sullivan leading Gross by 13 points. 70 percent of respondents said they don’t know who Gross is.

In another signal to national Democrat groups, Gross loaded stock footage video of himself to YouTube, which will now be lifted by these support groups as they come to his aid. It’s a classic campaign tactic to share information with a third party, when coordination is prohibited by law.

The Lincoln Project has a reputation for being acerbic and at times petty. It likes to ridicule President Trump and get into his head.

But there’s an element of political spite: One of the cofounders of the Lincoln Project was turned down for a role in the 2016 Donald Trump campaign and seems to go where the money is.

“Steve Schmidt, a co-founders of anti-Trump political action group the Lincoln Project, met with then-candidate Donald Trump and tried to join his campaign during a 2016 Manhattan meeting,” according to the Washington Post.

“But the Republican operative — best known for his work on John McCain’s failed presidential bid before becoming one of the faces of the ‘Never Trump’ movement — failed to get the gig because Trump thought he was a ‘total idiot,’ one of the sources said.”

Alaskans recall that Schmidt was responsible for the choice of Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin for McCain’s running mate, another failed campaign move.

Last month, he took credit for a caper in which his daughter and her friends swamped the RSVPs portal for a Trump rally, and blocked actual would-be attendees from going. That, at least, was a success.

The Lincoln Project has been characterized as a group of political grifters who are skimming money to stay in lavish hotels and pay themselves handsomely, but whose main deliverables appear to be a barrage of Twitter messages.

Governor appoints two to redistricting board

0

Bethany Marcum and E. Budd Simpson were named by Gov. Mike Dunleavy to the Alaska Redistricting Board today.

Marcum is the executive director of the Alaska Policy Forum in Anchorage, and Simpson is a Juneau attorney who represents Native Corporation Sealaska.

The redistricting board takes U.S. Census data to reapportion the state’s political boundaries. In areas where population has declined, representatives and senators boundaries get bigger. In places like the Mat-Su Valley, more representatives and senators will be assigned, since the population has grown.

It’s a highly political process and the redistricting board guides the effort, which almost always ends up in court in Alaska. Redistricting takes place every 10 years. In 2011, it took two years for the entire matter to be settled after several court challenges.

Now, Speaker Bryce Edgmon, Senate President Cathy Giessel, and Chief Justice of the Supreme Court Joel Bolger each will make one pick for the board.

The board must be seated by Sept. 1. Sen. Cathy Giessel goes next, then Rep. Bryce Edgmon, and finally the judge.

The picks have to be sensitive to judicial districts — one from each judicial districts. But there are four judicial districts and a five-member board.

Anchorage gay politicos abuse power by taking choice away from parents

Hypothetical: A teenager is raised as a born-again Christian. He has doubts about his faith and would like to see a counselor to help wean him off his religious beliefs. But there’s a problem. Three openly and unapologetic born-again Christians on the Anchorage Assembly passed an ordinance prohibiting any counselors from discouraging teenagers from leaving their Christian faith. If said counselors violated the law, they’d face a $500 fine and be liable for legal action.  

Might that be a problem? Of course. Politicians should never use their power to force their own personal beliefs on minors. That’s a decision for parents alone. 

But three openly gay Assembly members, Christopher Constant, Felix Rivera and Austin Quinn-Davidson are pushing a ban prohibiting counselors from helping teenagers with unwanted same-sex desires.

The ordinance describes this type of counseling as relying on “outdated views of gender roles and identities as well as the negative stereotype that being a sexual or gender minority or identifying as LGBTQ is an abnormal aspect of human development.” 

The ordinance does not carve out an exemption for clergy meaning a pastor would be prohibited from helping a teenager in their congregation wanting help from unwanted same-sex attraction.  

“The use of sexual orientation or gender identity change efforts, also known as ‘conversion therapy,’ is harmful and too often youth are subjected to it and have no say in the decision for its use” the ordinance reads in part. 

The ordinance backers must believe one of two things; There’s no such thing as unwanted same-sex attraction or if there is, such a person should not be allowed to get the help they desire. 

“The Anchorage Press published a three-part series on persons who are homosexual and the difficulties and impression they face growing up in Alaska, “reads the ordinance. 

That’s right, ordinance sponsors are admitting the far-left publication, The Anchorage Press, is influencing public policy. 

Eagle River Assembly member Jamie Allard opposes the ordinance.

“I cannot fathom my child being denied medical help. This goes beyond parental religious or LBGTQ rights. This speaks to the heart of our children looking for guidance from those they trust. If our children seek help for depression, suicide, or bullying, and the topic of sexual orientation comes up, the counseling must stop immediately. Why would we turn our backs on our children who are reaching out?” said Allard. 

Allard says the Assembly is set to vote on the ordinance Tuesday night. She hopes members will at the very least delay the vote and first allow input from the public. 

This type of legislation is typical of the Left. It’s similar to laws allowing children to get an abortion without their parent’s knowledge. It makes you wonder how far hard-core Leftists like Rivera, Constant, and Quinn-Davidson would go in stripping away parental rights if they knew they could get away with it politically.  

It’s reasonable to wonder if Rivera, Constant, and Quinn-Davidson are pushing such radical legislation as an attempt to seek validation and approval for their own lifestyles. Everyone wants to be accepted and nobody likes to be judged or looked down upon. It’s the same idea behind the “Drag Queen Story Hour” held on occasion at the Loussac Library in Anchorage. 

Homosexuality and gender confusion have become more accepted in recent years. But what Rivera, Constant, and Quinn-Davidson must understand is they have no right to demand others condone their lifestyle choices. Just as Christians shouldn’t demand those in the gay community accept their beliefs. 

Truth is some will never condone homosexuality or transgenderism as a healthy lifestyle. This is especially true for Christians. The Bible, the foundation of the Christian faith, could not be any clearer about teaching homosexuality is sin. Just as scriptures are clear about adultery, lying, murder, envy, jealousy, and other destructive behaviors.  

In a free society, Bible-believing Christians and those practicing homosexuality and transgenderism should be able to live at peace with each other. But that’s clearly not what Rivera, Constant, and Quinn-Davidson desire. As sponsors of this ordinance, they’re demanding Christians abandon their faith, values, and parental rights. It’s an obvious abuse of the power voters entrusted to them.  

Dan Fagan hosts a radio show weekday mornings on Newsradio 650 KENI.

Mayor’s vagrant hotel purchase plan postponed

BUT HAS MAYOR ALREADY SIGNED CONTRACT TO BUY GOLDEN LION?

The band of protesters cheered when an unmasked Assembly Member Jamie Allard pf Eagle River arrived at the Loussac Library for the special meeting of the Anchorage Assembly on Monday.

They booed when Mayor Ethan Berkowitz arrived, masked and ready for battle.

And they chanted “Vote No” when the other members of the Anchorage Assembly scurried by in masks to go into the building that the public was not allowed to enter — by order of the mayor.

One by one, six of the Assembly members filed into the chamber out of sight of the protesters.

In that empty chamber, they discussed for five hours Mayor Berkowitz’ plan to establish a web of services for vagrants throughout Anchorage, including shelters in family neighborhoods and drop-in day service centers close to schools where children are present daily.

About 70 citizens with signs and fighting spirit showed up at the library where the Assembly Chambers are located to express their displeasure with a set of ordinances that would use various pots of money to serve the vagrant population in Anchorage.

The money would come from federal CARES Act money, from the sale of Municipal Light & Power to Chugach Electric, and from the new alcohol tax that voters passed this past April.

The total investment includes purchasing four buildings in different neighborhoods, renovating, remodeling, and then establishing various services for the people who sleep on the streets, in doorways, and in encampments in the woods of Anchorage.

After five days of public testimony, Monday night’s discussion of the mayor’s plan went on for another five hours, as Berkowitz’ Chief of Staff Jason Bockenstedt answered questions from Assembly members. His slide presentation was 66 pages long.

[See Mayor Berkowitz’ slide deck on the vagrant plan at this link.]

Assemblyman John Weddleton tried to pull the Golden Lion Hotel on 36th Avenue and New Seward Highway out of the package. That failed 7-3. But Must Read Alaska has learned the Mayor’s Office has already signed a contract with the Golden Lion to purchase that building for $9 million. The Assembly, which is the appropriating body, does not seem to be aware of this. Update: Another source close to the matter says no contract has been signed.

Weddleton eventually said it was clear from the public testimony “…Public has lost confidence in us.”

Assembly Chair Felix Rivera brought in Mike Abbott, who has served as Municipal Manager, to provide special testimony. He now runs the Alaska Mental Health Trust Authority.

That’s when Allard asked for a point of order, to ask Rivera explain why one person was allowed in the chambers, when other people were not allowed.

Assembly member Forrest Dunbar then snapped back at Allard that he thought property was available in Eagle River for a homeless center on Yosemite Drive, across from the Eagle River High School. He was threatening her. Allard didn’t back down; she told Dunbar he should be more worried about his military career.

Late in the evening, the Assembly majority laid on the table an information memorandum that contained the over 700 pages of public testimony. When an item is “laid on the table” means it is not published on the agenda, which makes it harder for the public to access.

In the end, the clock struck midnight and the decision on the vagrant plan was postponed until Aug. 11. The regular Assembly meeting tonight has a host of other controversial items on the agenda, including a ban on any therapies to help young people overcome their homosexual, transexual, or other gender-related behaviors.

Assembly to look at limiting First Amendment rights of therapists and clients

ANCHORAGE COULD BAN SOME FORMS OF THERAPY FOR GAY CLIENTS

On Tuesday, the Anchorage Assembly will take up an ordinance that would prohibit counselors and therapists from helping young clients who are struggling with unwanted homosexual thoughts, gender dysphoria, or other gender identity or sexual variations.

Offered by three gay members of the Anchorage Assembly, the ordinance would mandate that if a minor wants counseling for unwanted sexual urges or expressions, therapists would have to end the counseling session and show their client the door. Families could, of course, travel to Palmer or Wasilla for such counseling, but it would not be available in Anchorage.

Opponents of the measure say the ordinance would infringe on the First Amendment rights of both patients and therapists, and put a chill on therapists who believe a young person is experiencing a temporary identity problem and want to explore what may be going on in that young person’s life.

The ordinance leans on the authority of a three-part story by the Anchorage Press that says persons who are homosexual are discriminated against. In the third part of the series, the Anchorage Press calls gender therapy “Conversion, The real hell,” focusing on two minors who had therapy forced on them by their parents.

The ordinance would not prevent pro-gay counseling and hormone therapies to assist a young person in presenting as the opposite sex or following romantic attractions with the same sex, but would prevent a counselor or therapist from any communication that would discourage that road for their patients.

In an Alaska Family Council workshop for pastors and others concerned that their religious freedoms or patient-therapist relationships are being infringed upon, Peter Sprigg of the Family Research Council warned that sexuality among minors can change as children grow in or out of experimentation phases.

He said that the ban on counseling is a form of “viewpoint discrimination” by a governing body, and that is a constitutional infringement on many levels.

Going to counseling is deeply personal experience that involves viewpoints, perceptions, and emotions, and if therapists think they are going to be sued because they ask questions of their patients, it will make therapists suppress their own viewpoints.

Sprigg added that parents are in charge of the health care and development of their children, something that has been upheld numerous times at the U.S. Supreme Court, and that there are minors who do want to undergo counseling for homosexual urges.

He also faulted the ordinance because it refers to licensed counselors, but doesn’t say who the licensing authority is. In some cases, churches sanction or license counseling services through ordination.

[The entire ordinance in its current form is at this link.]

The meeting starts at 5 pm, but the public is not allowed to attend, per an order by Mayor Ethan Berkowitz. You can find the full agenda and watch the proceedings at this link.

No public allowed: Assembly to meet on purchase of four buildings for vagrants

24

MAYOR BANS IN-PERSON ATTENDANCE BY TAXPAYERS

The Anchorage Assembly will meet today (Monday) at 6 pm at the Loussac Library’s Assembly Chambers to continue the discussion of the use of federal CARES Act funds for the mayor’s plan to purchase four buildings in Anchorage and convert them into a massive network of services for vagrants.

A group known as “Save Anchorage” plans to be at the Loussac Library at 5 pm to greet the Assembly members as they arrive.

But the public will not be allowed inside the building to witness the proceedings because Anchorage Mayor Ethan Berkowitz has banned public presence at Assembly meetings.

Watch the meeting through a link at: http://www.muni.org/Residents/Pages/MuniMeetings.aspx The meeting also will be live on Channel 9.

The Assembly will be taking up the following ordinances:

Ordinance No. AO 2020-66, an ordinance authorizing the acquisition by purchase, or lease with option to purchase, of real property legally described as: Lot 7A Block C Heather Meadows Subdivision (Plat 77-149) (PID 009-161-51), Lots 1 – 6 Block C Rosebud Subdivision (Plat P-224A), (PID 009-161-32, 009-161-33, 009-161-34, 009-161-35, 009-161-36, 009-161-37), Block 4A Central City Subdivision (Plat 76-245) (PID 003-241-29), the improvements on Lot 1 Block 33C USS 408 (Plat 84-374) (PID 003-073-33), and Tract C Green Valley Resubdivision No. 1 (Plat 73-210) (PID 010-193-22) (Properties) with aggregate acquisition and renovation costs not to exceed $22,500,000, Real Estate Department, Assembly Chair Rivera, and Assembly Members Zaletel and Constant.

Ordinance No. AO 2020-66(S), a an ordinance authorizing the acquisition by purchase, or lease with option to purchase, of real property legally described as: Lot 7a Block C Heather Meadows Subdivision (Plat 77-149) (PID 009-161-51), Lots 1 – 6 Block C Rosebud Subdivision (Plat P-224A), (PID 009-161-32, 009-161-33, 009-161-34, 009-161-35, 009-161-36, 009-161-37), Block 4a Central City Subdivision (Plat 76-245) (PID 003-241-29), the improvements on Lot 1 Block 33C USS 408 (Plat 84-374) (PID 003-073-33), and Tract C Green Valley Resubdivision No. 1 (Plat 73-210) (PID 010-193-22) (properties) with aggregate acquisition and renovation costs Not To Exceed $22,500,000., Real Estate Department, Assembly Chair Rivera, and Assembly Members Zaletel and Constant.

Ordinance No. AO 2020-66(S-1), a an ordinance authorizing the acquisition by purchase, or lease with option to purchase, of real property legally described as: Lot 7a Block C Heather Meadows Subdivision (Plat 77-149) (PID 009-161-51), Lots 1 – 6 Block C Rosebud Subdivision (Plat P-224A), (PID 009-161-32, 009-161-33, 009-161-34, 009-161-35, 009-161-36, 009-161-37), Block 4a Central City Subdivision (Plat 76-245) (PID 003-241-29), the improvements on Lot 1 Block 33C USS 408 (Plat 84-374) (PID 003-073-33), and Tract C Green Valley Resubdivision No. 1 (Plat 73-210) (PID 010-193-22) (properties) with aggregate acquisition and renovation costs Not To Exceed $22,500,000, Real Estate Department, Assembly Members Zaletel, Constant, and Kennedy.
(PUBLIC HEARING WAS CLOSED 7-22-2020.  ACTION WAS POSTPONED FROM 7-22-2020.)

Assembly Chair Felix Rivera wrote to Anchorage residents saying he is likely to support the proposal, although the matter may be postponed until Aug. 11. He has questions for the Berkowitz Administration that he wants answered. The questions he provided are:

  • What are the costs of renovations? Does $2-3M seem low? Is the timeline including renovations doable?   
  • What are the expected operating costs and how will we pay for them?   
  • How did you narrow down from the many other potential buildings mentioned?    
  • How many spaces are currently available in existing facilities and what is the current/expected in the fall/winter need?   
  • How does this proposed ordinance fit into the Treasury guidelines for usage of the CARES Act funds?    
  • When will these facilities be up and running?    
  • How will you ensure safe transportation to and from facilities? How much back and forth would there be?   
  • How will you ensure that any possible negative impacts to neighborhoods or businesses are mitigated?    
  • How can we incorporate community feedback during the RFP process?    

“If the administration is unable to address these points to my satisfaction, I will likely support an effort to postpone this item to the meeting of August 11 to allow more time to flesh out this proposal,” Rivera wrote.

“All of this said, I will likely support the proposal, whether on Monday or August 11. As I stated before, the need is undeniable and the opportunity to make live-saving changes to how we handle homelessness within the Municipality isn’t one we can pass up. It should also be noted that this proposal, if carried out correctly, will have tremendous positive impacts on public safety, which is a primary concern I heard from many,” Rivera continued.

The bad plan offered by Ballot Measure 2

OUTSIDE MONEY ENGAGES IN POLITICAL TRICKERY IN ALASKA

By SEAN PARNELL AND MARK BEGICH

The Covid crisis has increased interest in improving America’s election system. But not all election reforms would make things better.

Here in Alaska, a Colorado-based political-action committee, Unite America, spent more than $1 million to place the so-called Better Elections initiative on the November ballot. It’s a bad plan.

The voting process in Alaska, as in most states, is simple: Voters pick one candidate for each office, and the candidate with the most votes wins. The initiative would introduce a confusing new system called ranked-choice voting. Voters would receive a grid to rank multiple candidates. If no candidate receives a majority of “first place” votes, the lowest-ranked candidate would be eliminated. Votes would be retabulated based on second choices—then third and fourth ones until a “majority” emerges.

Jason McDaniel, a political scientist at San Francisco State University, found that ranked-choice voting decreased turnout by 3 to 5 percentage points on average in cities that implemented it. Mr. McDaniel was blunt in his conclusion, telling the New York Times : “My research shows that when you make things more complicated, which this does, there’s going be lower turnout.”

Voters may also be discouraged to learn their ballots may not count at all in the final vote. If you pick only one candidate and decline to rank the others, and your candidate is eliminated, your ballot is thrown out under what’s called “ballot exhaustion.”

2014 study of four cities’ ranked-choice elections, published in the journal Electoral Studies, found that up to 27% of ballots were “exhausted” and thus excluded from the final vote total.

The system also encourages political trickery. In the 2018 San Francisco mayoral race, two progressive candidates campaigned jointly—even cutting a television ad together—to try to game the system against a more moderate rival.

The gambit failed but drew harsh condemnation from the San Francisco Chronicle editorial board, which noted that “theories of elevating turnout and producing more positive, issue-oriented campaigns are not playing out in reality.”

Not surprisingly, several states and locales that experimented with ranked-choice voting—including Ann Arbor, Mich.; Aspen, Colo.; Pierce County, Wash.; and the state of North Carolina—have since repealed it.

Opposition to ranked-choice voting is bipartisan. In New York City, the state NAACP opposed it, and three Democratic members of the City Council’s Black, Latino and Asian Caucus said it hurts “immigrants and communities of color.” Minnesota state Sen. Mark Koran, a Republican, co-sponsored legislation to outlaw ranked-choice voting in his state: “Every vote should count, and every vote should be as simple as ‘I picked my top candidate.’ ”

As former elected officials from different parties, we’ve had our share of disagreements. But we are united in our belief that the Better Elections initiative would be bad for our state. Alaskans shouldn’t have to doubt that their votes count.

Mark Begich, a Democrat, served as a U.S. Senator from Alaska, 2009-15. Sean Parnell, a Republican, served as Alaska’s governor, 2009-14.

Is the Anchorage mask mandate working?

77

30 DAYS INTO THE MANDATE, CASES HAVE SPIKED

Mayor Ethan Berkowitz ordered all people in the municipality to mask up on June 26, 2020 to flatten the curve on COVID-19. If you’re out and mingling about in Alaska’s largest city, you are required to have a covering over your nose and mouth.

More than four weeks later, the number cases of coronavirus has exploded in Alaska, with Anchorage leading the pack. On June 26, there were 14 new cases identified in Anchorage as the mandate was put into effect. On July 22, 60 new cases were identified. Three days later, 158 cases in Anchorage were diagnosed, more than doubling the number of Anchorage cases in just three days.

And yet the compliance has been outstanding in Anchorage, for the most part, according to many observers. In stores, parks, and other public places, nearly everyone wears a mask these days. Some people even wear masks while taking a stroll in the fresh air.

Must Read Alaska has been monitoring this trend since the mandate went into effect and has observed COVID-19 spiking ever since the mandate was put in place. This is not to suggest the mask is useless, but raises the question about whether it’s working or if, indeed, the China virus would have spread even more rapidly without the mask mandate.

It’s possible that people are not taking seriously the other precautions, such as hand washing, staying six to 10 feet away from other people, and washing down surfaces with virus-killing solutions like alcohol, soap, or other sanitizers.

The combination of these precautions may slow the virus’ spread, but also require constant vigilance and the public may have become complacent, believing that masks are the magic bullet.

On Sunday, the Department of Health and Social Services announces the highest number of confirmed cases in a single day since the pandemic hit Alaska in March — 231 newly diagnosed individuals. Of these, 186 are residents and 45 are nonresidents. Of the nonresident cases, 34 are in the seafood industry, one is in the visitor industry and 10 are unknown.

There are four individuals on ventilators due to COVID-19 in Alaska, and 35 in the hospital. One more death over the reporting period brings the total number to 20 since March, and there are 1,687 active cases, which likely means there are many more active but not diagnosed. Some 207,264 COVID-19 tests have been administered in Alaska since March 2.

“Daily cases over 100 will soon diminish our hospital bed capacity. Now is the time for Alaskans to keep their social circles small, maintain 6 feet of distance from others, and wear a face covering when 6 feet can’t be maintained,” said Adam Crum. “Let’s work together to slow the spread, to protect our vulnerable, and to keep our businesses and economy running. It’s critical that Alaskans take this seriously. More announcements on mitigation strategy will be coming over the next couple days.”

Time to pay attention

By ANCHORAGE DAILY PLANET

If you seldom pay attention to the Anchorage Assembly’s antics, you may want to start to this week as it deals with several heated topics.

It will be doing all that, mind you, with the Assembly chambers closed because of COVID-19 worries, and testimony will be restricted to telephone and written comments.

On Monday, after hearing days of sometimes heated testimony against a city proposal to buy two hotels, the Bean’s Cafe campus and an Alaska Club building for $22.5 million in federal CARES Act funding, the Assembly is scheduled to take up the issue in a special session.

Public hearings on the proposed purchases were closed last week after several days of testimony. Many who testified complained about the speed and lack of transparency in the purchase attempt and wondered at the wisdom of putting such facilities in family neighborhoods and spending so much on aging infrastructure.

At the end of the public hearings, Mayor Ethan Berkowitz and his administration were invited to address the Assembly on the issue at Monday’s meeting.

Buying the four properties would remove about $300K from city tax rolls every year and cost taxpayers about $7 million annually in operating expenses, or that is the story. Government is involved. Who knows how much it would cost in the long run? Assembly members wanted to change the zoning ordinance to allow all that – without Planning and Zoning Commission Review – while opening up much of Anchorage to such facilities. They have given up on that idea – for now.

The city would use about 19 percent of its $116 million share of the federal CARES Act funding – supposedly aimed at helping individuals and business in these trying times – using a “lease with potential purchase” dodge to get around the act’s language specifically mandating the act’s funding be used only for temporary, emergency shelter. The city plans to use CARES money until unrestricted revenue from the $1 billion sale of ML&P to Chugach Electric and the new 5 percent retail alcohol tax hit city coffers. ( $1 billion. Unrestricted. Be nervous.)

On Tuesday, the Assembly during its regular meeting is slated to take up Berkowitz’s proposal to set up a city Office of Equity and Justice, led by none other than a Chief Equity Officer appointed by the mayor and confirmed by the Assembly. At $180K a year, no less.

We need it because COVID-19 has exposed “persistent structural inequities that have required municipal response to mitigate the disproportionate social determinants of health and equity facing people of color and low-income residents.” Berkowitz says.

Mind you, the city already has an Office of Equal Opportunity, the Anchorage Equal Rights Commission, the Ombudsman Office and the Resilience Subcabinet, whatever that is. We suggest getting rid of all those functionaries and let the Chief Equity Officer carry the load rather than adding to a meddlesome, expensive bureaucracy. After all, do we really need all those people?

The panel Tuesday also is slated to take up a proposed prohibition on sexual orientation and gender identity change efforts targeting minors, along with a proposed moratorium until September on evictions for failure to pay rent.

This would be a good week to pay attention. Monday’s agenda. Tuesday’s agenda. How to testify on Tuesday.

[More stories at the Anchorage Daily Planet, at this link.]