Saturday, July 19, 2025
Home Blog Page 1160

Juneau to take up taxes for onboard purchases on ships

12

The Juneau Assembly’s Finance Committee is considering a proposal that would tax any purchases that cruise ship passengers make onboard their cruise ship while it is docked in Juneau.

Currently, there are not cruise ships in Juneau and there likely won’t be any for 18 months, due to the COVID-19 coronavirus outbreak. Cruise ship onboard purchases are exempt from the Juneau sales tax of 5 percent.

The proposal to tax onboard sales is buried in the 163-page packet that the Finance Committee will consider tonight.

Also in the packet for consideration is a proposal for mandatory disclosure of the sales price of real estate transactions. The State of Alaska does not require mandatory disclosure of the sales price for real estate transactions, but also doesn’t preclude home rule municipalities from their ability to write an ordinance requiring mandatory disclosure.

Sen. Sullivan brings Secretary of the Navy to Ketchikan to tour submarine testing site

7

Three weeks ago, when Sen. Dan Sullivan was hosting a town hall meeting in Ketchikan, the residents of the community asked him to bring the Secretary of the Navy to Alaska’s “First City.”

Sullivan promised he would bring him.

On Tuesday, Sullivan delivered on that promise, as Kenneth J. Braithwaite flew to Alaska and the senator and he toured Ketchikan, which has mission-critical submarine testing facilities about which few Alaskans know.

The visit thought to be the first of any Secretary of the Navy to Alaska, or at the very least, to Back Island.

The two and an entourage that included Sen. Bert Stedman and Rep. Daniel Ortiz toured Back Island, the site of the Southeast Alaska Acoustic Measurement Facility. That’s the Navy’s primary West Coast asset for making high fidelity tests on submarines to measure their acoustic signatures.

With tests that can be done in the 1,500-foot-deep Behm Canal, the site is ideal for this work because of the low ambient noise and lack of other noise interference.

[Read more about the Back Island submarine testing facility here.]

Sullivan was excited about the visit, and says he is on a mission to bring the Navy to Alaska and establish a base here, because with the Arctic and the Pacific Ocean, he believes the case can be made for national security.

Currently, the Army and Air Force have large presences in Alaska, as does the U.S. Coast Guard. But neither the Marines or the Navy have bases in the largest state in the union, which has exposure to Russia, North Korea, and China.

Braithwaite was sworn in as the 77th Secretary of the Navy in May. He is a former ambassador to Norway and was a naval aviator who was once stationed in Adak.

During his confirmation hearings, Sullivan made him promise to visit Alaska very early in his tenure to experience firsthand the state’s strategic location and the communities that support our military.

Dunleavy tells Montana company SITKA Gear to take a hike on its opposition to ANWR oil development

ANCHORAGE DAILY NEWS EDITOR PILES ON WITH UNFORCED ERROR

A Montana-based company called “SITKA Gear” is the latest business to be scolded by Gov. Mike Dunleavy for opposing Alaska’s economic underpinning of resource development.

Dunleavy, in a social media post, told Sitka Gear that he didn’t appreciate its company stance against the leasing of a tiny portion of the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge for oil development.

Dunleavy has also called out some banks and financial institutions, such as Goldman Sachs and JP Morgan, for their refusal to invest in Alaska oil plays on the North Slope. The oil developed in Alaska fuels the state economy and pays for the state services Alaskans enjoy.

Sitka Gear wrote on Facebook that it opposes drilling in ANWR:

“At SITKA, we value ecosystems and believe it’s our duty to speak up when we see steps being taken that threaten priceless wild places such as the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge, the largest remaining stretch of wilderness in the United States. We believe that drilling should not be permitted in an area that sustains 187,000 caribou and so much more. The risk posed by drilling for oil and gas is not one to be taken lightly. Please join us in raising our voices, and speaking up for the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge. This is an ecosystem that must be protected. There’s no bringing it back once it’s gone. Please consider signing the petition at http://bit.ly/Protect_ANWR.

The ironies are rich with this one: Sitka Gear has its outdoor wear manufactured in China, and most of it is petroleum-based. It’s doubtful the the workers constructing the gear are covered by labor agreements or workplace safety regulations. Its parent company is based in Delaware but it has offices in more than 25 countries, with manufacturing operations in the U.S., Germany, United Kingdom, China and Japan.

Gore’s founder Bill Gore was posthumously inducted into The Plastics Academy’s Plastics Hall of Fame in 1990. Plastics, of course, made of petroleum.

Anchorage Daily News Opinion Editor Tom Hewitt piled on, goading Must Read Alaska by saying that Dunleavy is participating in cancel culture against an Alaska company, when in fact the company was founded in California and moved to Montana in 2012. Oops.

Sitka Gear was sold to W.L. Gore & Associates Inc., known as the developer of GORE-TEX® Fabrics, in 2009. It is one of the 200 largest privately held companies in America.

(Dunleavy didn’t point out that SITKA Gear is also culturally appropriating an Alaska Tlingit name, even though the company has no roots in Sitka, and no association with Alaska, but we’ll leave that for ADN’s Hewitt to sort out with his woke advisers.)

One responder to SITKA Gear’s manifesto on ANWR wrote: ” I’m sure glad my friend Grey pointed this out. I was looking at buying my hubby a bunch of new gear, and a few things for myself. The area to be developed is .00010% of 19M acres. I don’t spend my money with companies that lie, so bye!”

Mat-Su Education Assn. threatens to strike over superintendent’s letter to parents in district

55

The Mat-Su Education Association is upset because the superintendent of schools sent an email to all teachers detailing the facts of the contract being proposed by the Mat-Su School Board. The two sides have been bargaining for 18 months with no resolution.

Superintendent Randy Trani sent the letter to teachers so they could evaluate what they are voting on, but the union said that action was “devastating to the bargaining process and detrimental to securing a contract for Valley educators.”

“Last week, the Mat-Su Borough School Board made a ‘last, best offer’ in contract negotiations to the Mat-Su Education Association Bargaining team. Members of the team believed they would have an opportunity to evaluate the proposal, discuss the terms with its membership, and provide an answer, as well as a counteroffer if necessary. Instead, Superintendent Trani short-circuited the process by contacting every single teacher in the MSBSD with the terms of the contract and published editorial pieces in major news outlets with bias opinions,” the union wrote.

Dianne K. Shibe, President of the Mat-Su Education Association noted that the union has been bargaining in “good faith” for 18 months. “These actions erode what little good faith remained between our team and the school board. More than anything, this makes me sad that this new superintendent would blindside the educators he was hired to lead before we even had a chance to work with him.”

“If these are the tactics and practices we can expect from the superintendent and the school board, we are going to have no choice but to take decisive action,” said Shibe. “There is a lot of frustration, anger, and disappointment among our members right now. To be treated this way while also navigating teaching during a pandemic is salt in the wound.”

If the school board stands firm on its offer, the union will call a strike vote for all certificated employees, she wrote.

School board meeting on Wednesday will continue the process of discussing the negotiations. Teachers who have seen the contract should contact their school board members to let them know how they feel about the terms.

18 months of bargaining: Fair offer for Mat-Su teachers is on the table

6

By RANDY TRANI

Over the past week, childrens’ joyous laughter and the calm guiding voices of teachers have drifted on the late summer breezes from school play fields across the Mat-Su. Those voices and laughter were music to my ears. The first days of school bring my two favorite groups of people together: students and teachers.

This first week of school is particularly important to those two groups because we are managing the new reality of learning and teaching in the midst of a global pandemic.

COVID-19 has brought so many challenges to our communities, our state, and our nation. Federal pandemic aid is dwindling, state revenues are down as oil prices remain well below what was anticipated by the state budget, families are struggling to make ends meet in an economy that is faltering, enrollment in Mat-Su schools is down and therefore revenue needed to educate students may be reduced at the state level. Financial resources are scarce, while uncertainty is trading at all-time highs.

In this challenging environment, the Mat-Su Borough School Board is taking on the task of trying to provide predictability to a school district’s most critical employees: teachers.

After 18 months of collective bargaining, the Board has not yet reached a new collective bargaining agreement with the Matanuska-Susitna Education Association.

On Aug. 26, the Board provided MSEA with what I believe to be a fair proposal to teachers so they can focus on the paramount task of educating our students.

To be clear, I don’t think there is any way that teachers can be paid appropriately for the work they do with our children. Teachers literally change people’s lives. I am a product of the good work teachers did on behalf of a homeless kid in Cordova who had never been to school until second grade.

The debt I owe those teachers and the debt society owes teachers in general for all of the stories like mine can never be repaid. Sadly, K-12 funding across Alaska and the country does not provide the compensation our professional educators deserve. I believe the Board’s offer represents a fair middle ground that provides teachers financial stability in an uncertain time.

In recent years, teachers in the Mat-Su have worked under collective bargaining agreements that only offered 0% or 1% salary adjustments; however, those eligible received experience and education increases. Still, those static or small salary schedule adjustments do not keep up with inflation. Teachers donate time and effort every day beyond their contractual hours, and for years, many have done so while their disposable income has decreased. When a new collective bargaining agreement was not reached last year, teachers continued to pay 100% of health insurance premium increases. Although those past histories were agreed to through bargaining, the Board, through its new offer, is endeavoring to more equitably share those health insurance premium costs.

The Board’s last offer to the teachers is fair because it offers a $1,500 lump sum payment in recognition of last year’s service by the teachers. It is fair because it provides a salary adjustment of 1.75% each year for three years; adjustments designed to keep up with inflation. The offer is fair because it increases the district’s contribution towards health insurance with future premium increases being shared equally by the district and teachers. The offer is fair because the district and its teachers will share joint responsibility to explore the health care market to find the most economical health care options for staff. The offer is fair to the entire educational community because with careful management and creative changes to the delivery of instruction, the district can support the approximately $23 million three-year cost of the Board’s offer without major layoffs and, through the use of the district’s $18 million reserves.

Under the Board’s offer, last year’s beginning teacher will receive an increase of $3,600 this school year and receive a $1,500 lump-sum payment. I believe this is fair. A mid-career teacher with a master’s degree will receive an increase of almost $3,900 more this year than last, as well as a $1,500 lump-sum payment. I believe this is fair. Even a teacher with 30 years experience at the end of the salary schedule will receive more than a $2,000 increase in addition to the $1,500 lump-sum payment. I believe this is fair.

Last year, the district paid 83% of the health insurance premium, even for the Public Education Health Trust’s “Cadillac” plan with a $100 individual deductible and $300 family deductible. Yet, the District had no say in the selection of the health insurance provider. Under the Board’s offer, the district will pay 87% of the health insurance premium this year, with future health insurance premium increases shared equally between teachers and the district, and the district can explore and propose other health insurance providers. I believe this is fair.

Boiled down to essentials, my job and responsibility is to look out for the education of the district’s students. Unfortunately, the difficulty of that task is magnified by the fact that the district is almost 100% dependent on funding from the state and Borough, and both entities face a bleak financial’s students. Unfortunately, the difficulty of that task is magnified by the fact that the district is almost 100% dependent on funding from the state and borough, and both entities face a bleak financial outlook. I know that teachers are essential to the core mission of our district. Considering all the adversity faced by the district, the borough and the state, the Board’s offer is fair and I hope that in the court of public opinion, the Board’s offer will be viewed as such and supported.

My overwhelming hope is that the teacher’s union accepts the Board’s last offer. I am confident that together we can make sure our childrens’ laughter and joy will continue to drift on the breezes across the play fields of the Mat-Su.

Randy Trani, Ed.D., is the superintendent of the Mat-Su Borough School District.

John Binkley chairs redistricting board

15

At the first meeting of the Alaska Redistricting Board, well-known Alaska businessman, civic leader, and occasional political leader John Binkley of Fairbanks was elected chair.

The redistricting board is in charge of redrawing the political boundaries for Alaska after the 2020 election. In the background over recent weeks since the board was appointed, the members have been jockeying to see who had the votes to become the chair. Two of the members of the board represent rural Alaska Democrat interests, while the other three represent Fairbanks, Southeast Alaska, and South-central.

Binkley was nominated by board member Bethany Marcum, a move that surprised Nome member Melanie Bahnke. She immediately counter-nominated the other rural representative, Nicole Borromeo. The vote went for Binkley, three to two.

Kanye for Prez? Alaskans have choices for president

5

With just two months away until the General Election, the Alaska election season just got a little more Yeezy. Someone has started putting Kanye West for President signs around Anchorage.

West, a rapper, producer, and fashion designer, is also the husband of Kim Kardashian. He has recently become a Christian and also said that he is bipolar.

In July, West wrote on Twitter that he was running for president under the BDY Party, which he calls the “Birth Day Party.”

In an interview with Forbes about his run, he said that America needs someone special to be president.

“You know? Obama’s special. Trump’s special. We say Kanye West is special. America needs special people that lead. Bill Clinton? Special. Joe Biden’s not special.”

Although many believe it is just a publicity stunt, on July 15 West filed paperwork with the Federal Election Commission and he held his first rally on July 19.

West would have to be a write-in candidate because he is not running with a registered party in Alaska.

There are already numerous write-in candidates registered with the Division of Elections; Kanye West is not one of them. Most of them are from out of state, but have registered as write-ins in Alaska.

West is on the ballot in Minnesota and Tennessee.

Those presidential candidates who are registered with the Division of Elections include:

ROUSE, DEBORAH / CANNON, SHEILA NON-AFFILIATED, write in

WELLS, KASEY / WELLS, RACHEL M. NON-AFFILIATED, write in

HOWARD, SHAWN / HOWARD, ALYSSA NON-AFFILIATED, write in

BODDIE, PRESIDENT R. / STONEHAM, ERIC C. NON-AFFILIATED, write in

TITTLE, SHEILA “SAMM” / WAGNER, JOHN NON-AFFILIATED, write in

BALL, DENNIS ANDREW / SANDERS, RICHARD A. AOA-ANC , write in

CELLA, TODD / CELLA, TIM NON-AFFILIATED, write in

JORGENSEN, JO / COHEN, JEREMY “SPIKE” LIBERTARIAN NOMINEE

BIDEN, JOSEPH R. / HARRIS, KAMALA D. DEMOCRATIC NOMINEE

DE LA FUENTE, ROQUE “ROCKY” / RICHARDSON, DARCY G. ALLIANCE PARTY NOMINEE

BLANKENSHIP, DON / MOHR, WILLIAM CONSTITUTION PARTY NOMINEE

TRUMP, DONALD J. / PENCE, MICHAEL R. REPUBLICAN NOMINEE

JANOS, JAMES G. “JESSE VENTURA” / MCKINNEY, CYNTHIA GREEN PARTY NOMINEE

Ballot Measure 1 is a result of hate and greed; vote no

8

By MURRAY WALSH

I have been watching the initiative process in Alaska for 44 years. Each and every one of them has been based on hate or greed. 

Ballot Measure 1, on the ballot this coming Nov. 3, is based on both. This is the proposal to increase the tax burden on the major oil operators in Alaska. Alaska already has a high tax on produced oil, nearly the highest in the world.

Ballot Measure 1’s sponsors are from two camps: political operators who want the state to have more money to spend and do not believe the golden goose will be overly bothered (the greed side); and, enviro-climate activists who want to terminate the fossil fuel industry (the hate side.)  

The reality that the long-term interests of either group conflict with the interests of the other doesn’t seem to bother these strange bedfellows. The greed side thinks that the industry will just suck it up and keep on going as before. This is not true.

This is far from the first time such a destructive tax change has been proposed. The previous attempt, another initiative-based tax increase, flamed out in the 2014 election but had its roots in an earlier oil tax increase that was actually passed into law in the 2007 session of the Alaska Legislature called ACES. 

Who were the actors?  Why none other than Gov. Sarah Palin in partnership with then-House Minority Leader Rep. Beth Kerttula. Both bragged about “working across the aisle” to get it done.  (Strange bedfellows indeed!)

The result?  Upon passage of ACES, not one more nickel of petroleum exploration money was approved by the industry on the North Slope.  Exploration projects that were already funded and underway went ahead but nothing new was initiated. 

The exploration effort was all but ended by the time Sean Parnell became governor upon Palin’s abdication in mid-2009.  It took Parnell a couple of years to set things right with SB 21 and exploration resumed and continues to this day with lots of good results and new oil headed for TAPS.

We have to remember that Alaska competes with other oil-bearing regions of the world and oil companies have choices about where they invest.  Alaska has some attractions that other places do not, but the most repellant aspects of our treatment of the industry has been tax instability and disrespect.  Instability from the greedy and disrespect from the haters.

I am not saying that we have to do whatever the oil industry wants.  There have been legitimate beefs with the industry – usually tax accounting disagreements – that had to be sorted out, sometimes in court. Occasional bad behavior on their part does not justify massive bad behavior on our part. 

I am saying that Alaska has to be in a responsible partnership with oil.  The two essential ingredients of such a partnership are stability and respect.  

The sponsors of Ballot Measure 1 don’t want us to have partnership with the oil industry.  They want us to be at war where greed and hate have made their nest.  

I am also not saying that we as a society have to be committed to fossil-powered energy indefinitely.  There is a good trend, nation-wide, to battery-based cars and now small trucks and also a trend to generating electricity by non-fossil means. The transition is happening.  Going to war with the fossil energy industry will only slow it down and surely will not speed it up.

The most significant change in modern society – from an air pollution standpoint – was the transition to unleaded gasoline. It happened without riots, mass upheaval or demonstrations. Society agreed on the need and got it done. Climate change activists should take a lesson from that experience.  There don’t have to be losers in order for there to be winners.

Please join me in voting no on Ballot Measure 1.

Walsh is self-employed and has been an observer/participant in Alaska politics and economics since 1976.  He lives in Juneau.

Green Party of Alaska nominates Jesse Ventura for president

21

The Green Party of Alaska is not going along with the national Green Party in its nomination of the party’s standard-bearer Howie Hawkins for president.

Instead, the Alaska Green Party has voted for Jesse “The Body” Ventura for president and Cynthia McKinney for Vice President. Their names will appear on the Nov. 3 General Election ballot.

In a highly unusual but calculated move, Ventura is actually being drafted by the Alaska Green Party. The former governor of Minnesota. who lives half of the year on the beach in Mexico in a house that is “off the grid,” has not thrown his name in the hat for consideration.

McKinney is a Green Party member from Georgia who served in Congress from 1993-2003 as a Democrat, and who was at the heart of several political controversies.

Robert Shields, who chairs the Green Party of Alaska, said part of the thinking was to give Alaska Republicans someone other than President Donald Trump to vote for. He thinks that Ventura’s name will shake things up this political season.

“[Ventura] was an easy choice for independent Alaskans and he is clearly the most competent candidate. Drafting is a proven way to make radical changes to the system.”

Shields said that President Eisenhower was drafted for Republicans in the 1950s and the Green Party of Alaska is using that model.

Richard Idriss, who is in leadership at the People for Jesse campaign, said, “The People for Jesse largely moved on from the Green Party after their national convention to work toward an independent write-in campaign for Governor Ventura, but we had always recognized an internal schism within the state Green parties as a possible outcome of their primary. Tension around presidential nominee selection has led to these sorts of issues within both the Green and Libertarian parties before.”

Shields said he thinks Ventura will drain votes from Trump but not so much from Joe Biden.

“It gives Republicans an out, a quiet way to say they can’t be part of this anymore,” he said.

In 2016, the Green Party ticket led by Jill Stein received over 4,000 votes in Alaska.

Ventura was a professional wrestler before running for governor of Minnesota as a “Reform Party” candidate in 1998.

According to the Freedom From Religion Foundation, he strongly backed gay rights, abortion rights, funding for higher education, mass transit, property tax reform, and opening trade relations with Cuba. He was flamboyant and unpredictable.

He was the recipient in 1999 of Freedom from Religion Foundation’s Emperor Has No Clothes Award for his “plain speaking” against religion and for refusing to proclaim a state “Day of Prayer.” He vetoed a bill that would have required students to recite the Pledge of Allegiance in public schools.

McKinney ran for president under the Green Party in 2008. When she was in the U.S. House as a Democrat, she filed articles of impeachment against President George W. Bush and Vice President Dick Cheney. In 2006, she scuffled with Capitol Hill Police officer after they asked her to show her identification.

The Alaska Green Party polled its members and Ventura won 50 percent of the vote among several choices, which included Donald Trump and the national Green Party’s nominee Howie Hawkins: