Sunday, April 26, 2026
Home Blog Page 1138

Setting the narrative: San Francisco news group labels Save Anchorage ‘right-wing’

29

MOLE FROM ‘SAVE ANCHORAGE’ IS SLIPPING INTEL TO CANDIDATE DUNBAR

“At the same time that Anchorage’s fringe right-wing groups have been organizing, the city’s Democratic Party has been falling apart,” wrote The Appeal, an online newspaper in San Francisco, which has taken a sudden interest in the mayor’s race in Anchorage. It’s so worried that the Democratic Party is falling apart, that the Bay Area news organization has jumped in to save candidate Forrest Dunbar.

This is how the narrative is shaped: Leftwing candidates reach out to leftwing writers to give them an assist with the voting public, getting them to damage their opponents. In this case, it appears that “Save Anchorage” is mayoral candidate Forrest Dunbar’s opponent. He is trying to tie candidate Dave Bronson to the group, which has someone funneling information out to Dunbar.

It’s possible that his deeps association with the Anchorage Press and Blue Alaskan are not helping Assemblyman Dunbar enough. Now he’s had to get San Francisco, the home of former Mayor Ethan Berkowitz, to lend a hand.

It would not be the first time that Dunbar sought to damage the 8,000 members of the Save Anchorage group, which is comprised of a lot of normal moms and a few wild-eyed people who are mad at city government. Dunbar recently mentioned Save Anchorage and Must Read Alaska as his enemies in a fundraising letter to all Anchorage super-voters.

A reporter for The Appeal in San Francisco interviewed Dunbar, and characterized him as worried about “Save Anchorage,” which organized last year after a series of radical decisions to shut down the city’s businesses, purchase hotels for vagrants, and ban a practice called “conversion therapy.” Save Anchorage was a constant presence at protests during the summer, fall, and winter at Assembly meetings, as members tried to save the city’s economy.

The Appeal is funded in part by the wife of Mark Zuckerberg, who is the CEO of Facebook.

Dance protest in front of the locked Anchorage Assembly meeting last fall.

The Appeal has been reaching out to readers in Anchorage through a public relations wire service to try to get them to read the story, in which they characterize Save Anchorage as the real radicals. The story, appearing as the lead item in the current edition of The Appeal, refers to Anchorage Daily News, the Anchorage Press, and Alaska Public Media stories as its sources its summary of the political environment in Anchorage. It is a textbook case of parachute journalism.

“On March 21, 2020, the city began using its sports arena and other large venues as temporary shelters. Over the summer, the city proposed using $22.5 million in federal CARES Act funds to buy four properties to house homeless people. Public health advocates and progressives applauded the decisions, but for a set of right-wing Anchorage residents, the decisions amounted to a rallying cry,” the news organization wrote. It then went on to say the group threatened violence and that a Facebook user named James Mileur “stormed the U.S. Capitol” on Jan. 6.

The Appeal then revealed the existence of a mole in Save Anchorage: “At least 8,000 people have joined the group, which has since been made private. But one person has ensured that its message stays in the public discourse.”

In addition to Zuckerberg money, The Appeal is funded by several radical left-wing nonprofit organizations. With a staff of dozens, it is essentially an unregistered field organizing team that appears to be putting the target on Save Anchorage as the Anchorage mayoral race heats up.

The story also swiped at mayoral candidates Dave Bronson and Mike Robbins. The author paints Bronson as being anti-homeless, while painting Robbins as someone associated with a dating website called Romanian American Matrimonial Introduction Services, and also a supporter of Donald Trump’s presidential campaign in 2016.

Suzanne Downing is the publisher of Must Read Alaska. She is a former business owner, longtime journalist, and political adviser who worked for Gov. Jeb Bush of Florida and Gov. Sean Parnell of Alaska.  Raised in Juneau, Alaska and based somewhere in Alaska, she was the editor of the Juneau Empire and now writes on current events and politics.

Vaccine passport: Mayor eases up mask orders for those on the job who got the jab

Acting Mayor Austin Quinn-Davidson says people can remove their face masks — sometimes. In workplace settings, vaccinated individuals may remove their masks under limited circumstances. Those who are not vaccinated may not.

The mayor has revised Emergency Order 13: Those who are fully vaccinated against Covid-19 no longer need to wear a mask when separate from the public and unvaccinated coworkers. But if they are around coworkers, the mask must go on.

Fully vaccinated means someone who is two weeks past his or her full series of vaccine: Two weeks after the Johnson & Johnson vaccine or two weeks after the second dose of Pfizer or Moderna.

Masks are still required indoors when in public settings or communal spaces outside of the home and at outdoor gatherings in public, the mayor said.

The mayor’s emergency powers are given to her by the Anchorage Assembly, which votes on renewing them once again at Tuesday’s Assembly meeting. At every Assembly meeting, Assemblywoman Jamie Allard makes a motion to remove the emergency powers from the mayor. At every meeting of the Assembly for the past six months, it is voted down by the progressive Assembly.

Suzanne Downing is the publisher of Must Read Alaska. She is a former business owner, longtime journalist, and political adviser who worked for Gov. Jeb Bush of Florida and Gov. Sean Parnell of Alaska.  Raised in Juneau, Alaska and based somewhere in Alaska, she was the editor of the Juneau Empire and now writes on current events and politics.

Graduation limits: Only two attendees per student allowed in Anchorage

17

The Anchorage School Board has ruled that high school graduations will have attendance limits: No more than two attendees per student are allowed to accompany graduating seniors for the big day.

Graduations will be held outdoors beginning May 5 and continuing through the month at Anchorage high schools. The school board says that due to the current emergency order from the acting mayor of Anchorage, attendance must be limited.

Some parents are unhappy with the decision.

“This is an outdoor event,” wrote one parent. “It will be easy to spread out. We have families making plans to travel to Alaska to celebrate with us and now we can’t have them at the ceremony.”

Over 30 percent of Alaskans have received at least one dose of the Covid vaccine; 372,157 vaccine shots have been given in Alaska so far. Another 60,000 Alaskans have had the illness within the last year.

Last year, graduation was canceled due to the mayor’s policies surrounding the Covid-19 pandemic. This year, the ceremonies are taking place in the football stadiums of the various high schools, as listed at this Anchorage School District link.

The Muni perks — four hours leave to get a vaccination? It ain’t chicken feed

By ANCHORAGE DAILY PLANET

The Assembly at this evening’s meeting is slated to consider a resolution, AR 2021-87, agreeing to a deal with city employee unions to get up to four hours of leave time to get COVID-19 vaccination shots.

The resolution, proposed by the city’s mayor-select, Austin Quinn-Davidson, could cost the city as much as $135,000 if all the city’s union workers take advantage of the deal.

You might think city workers, like the rest of us, would get the vaccine on their own to keep from getting or spreading the virus, or to avoid being crippled or killed themselves. Apparently our mayor-select sees it differently, or has found a way to slip another benefit to the city’s unions.

Instead of costing Anchorage money, why does the city not simply set up vaccination stations at workplaces? Why? Because city unions support the left-leaning members of the Assembly and this is a nice little payback at taxpayers’ expense.

Let’s face it, $135,000 out of a bloated, half billion-dollar annual city budget is not really a big deal, but it ain’t chicken feed either.

Interview with Russell Biggs: The journey to recall Felix Rivera from Anchorage Assembly

5

Russell Biggs didn’t see himself getting embroiled in an effort to recall the chairman of the Anchorage Assembly. But last summer, when the Assembly Chair Felix Rivera locked the public out of meetings, but allowed his chosen friendlies to attend and testify in violation of the mayor’s emergency orders, Biggs had seen enough.

He had been watching the Assembly meetings on television and online with interest, because a certain ordinance, A066, was going to impact his neighborhood.

To summarize that ordinance, the Assembly was preparing to purchase the Golden Lion Hotel and turn it into some kind of service for addicts. It was unclear whether it would be a shelter or a treatment center.

Information coming from the Berkowitz Administration was full of mixed messages, and the progressives on the Assembly were preparing to go around the planning commission process and simply approve the purchase of buildings around the city to create a network of services for homeless, vagrants, and addicts. Four buildings were part of the plan — the America’s Best hotel, the Tudor Road Alaska Cub building, and Beans Cafe.

The public was outraged. Their voices were not being heard by the Assembly, which had locked its doors to people wanting to testify against the proposal. But Rivera made an exception. Mike Abbott, executive director of the Alaska Mental Health Trust, was invited inside to give expert testimony, while the Assembly chambers remained locked to everyone else. That move violated the Berkowitz emergency order because with Abbott and another person in the room, the Assembly was breaking the law. When Assemblywoman Jamie Allard brought the violation to the attention of Rivera, he ignored it and continued to exceed the gathering limit that the rest of Anchorage residents were ordered to observe.

Biggs, who spoke to Suzanne Downing on the Must Read Alaska Show, explained to listeners how the recall unfolded from there, and how it’s going now, just two weeks before all the mail-in ballots are due at the Anchorage Election Division. The election ends April 6.

Listen to the show at YouTube, or a podcast host from this list.

How do Alaskans remove their names from Recall Dunleavy petition? Follow these steps

Over 57,000 Alaskans have signed the petition to recall Gov. Mike Dunleavy, but some are having buyer’s remorse. In response to multiple queries to Must Read Alaska about how people can remove their names, we have the following information from the Division of Elections:

Here is the link to the signature withdrawal form at the Division of Elections.

The request to have your name removed must be received prior to the date the petition booklets are filed. You may choose to complete this withdrawal form and submit it to the division by mail, fax or email as an attached PDF, TIFF, or JPEG file or you may submit an email to the division that contains the same information listed.   

If sending an email with the form attached, it would help if senders use a common subject line such as: “Notice to Remove Recall Signature“. This will help the Division sort these requests quickly.

Once the signatures are turned in, it’s too late to remove your name. Those names become part of the public record and are publicized in various ways. The names are also incorporated into campaign and political party databases to add to voter profiles.

This is not what signers are being told by the paid signature gatherers, who have promised them their information will be kept confidential.

For those who have second thoughts about recalling the governor, they have a very small window of opportunity to remove their names; it’s believed that the Recall Dunleavy Committee is working to get all of the signatures it needs by the end of the month and will be filing those names with the Division of Elections shortly after.

PDF Form for withdrawing signature:

Alaska GOP chairman moving to Virginia

Alaska Republican Party Chairman Glenn Clary and his wife Debbie will be moving to Lynchburg, Virginia, he announced today in an email.

Clary has accepted a position with Liberty University, which is led by former Anchorage Baptist Temple Pastor Jerry Prevo. Clary is a pastor at Anchorage Baptist Temple, but has announced his retirement to take up leadership of Liberty University’s “Standing for Freedom Center” as vice president of Strategic Partnerships and Alliances.

“Debbie and I would appreciate your prayers as we transition into this new assignment God has directed us to accept. Thank you for your faithfulness to our Lord Jesus Christ and the New Life Community Class. I will miss this chapter of our life,” he wrote in an email.

Clary took over as chairman of the Alaska Republican Party at the end of 2018. The party’s vice chair, Ann Brown, will take over and the vice chair will be vacant. Debbie Clary, the party secretary, will also be vacating her position.

Clary has not announced his resignation from the party itself, but that is an action that can be anticipated. The next State Central Committee meeting is when the new vice chair and new secretary will be elected. That meeting is in June.

Did your ballot arrive at the Election Office? Ask MRAK’s Ballot Integrity Desk

12

Once again, Must Read Alaska is providing a service to Anchorage voters who want to know if their ballot was received by the Anchorage Municipality’s Division of Elections.

With mail-in and drop-box elections, many voters lack confidence that their ballot was actually received. If you’d like us to check for you, email us at [email protected] with your name and street name.

Must Read Alaska will check the “ballots received” list from the Elections Division at the Muni, which we receive daily, and get back to you in a timely way.

MRAK has provided this service to Anchorage voters since 2019.

Day 60 fail: House still operating without adopting Uniform Rules

20

A disagreement in the Alaska House of Representatives left the body politic operating without the use of Uniform Rules for yet another day, after the floor session ended on Saturday.

Monday is the 61st day of the legislative session.

House minority member Rep. David Eastman and others said the House is supposed to adopt the Uniform Rules first, and then amend them.

Instead, the House Rules Chair and the House Speaker are allowing the rules to be amended before they are adopted. It seems arcane, but the Legislature is a rule-based organization, and the Uniform Rules and Mason’s Manual are the Bible for orderly operations.

In the forward of the Uniform Rules, the book informs readers how the Uniform Rules are required to be adopted:

Sec. 24.05.120. Rules. At the beginning of the first regular session of each legislature, both houses shall adopt uniform rules of procedure for enacting bills into law and adopting resolutions. The rules in effect at the last regular session of the immediately preceding legislature serve as the temporary rules of the legislature until the adoption of permanent rules.

Rule 53 seems to reinforce the importance of adopting first, amending later.

Rule 53. Adoption and Amendment of Rules. The Uniform Rules of each legislature shall be adopted in joint session by a majority vote of the full membership of each house. Thereafter the Uniform Rules may be amended only by the adoption of a concurrent resolution by a two-thirds vote of the full membership of each house. When the rules are affected by constitutional and statutory changes, the Legislative Council will effect the necessary formal revision in the next printing of the rules and inform the Rules Committee of the changes made.

Rep. Matt Claman, an Anchorage Democrat argued that this is how it’s always been done — amending the Uniform Rules before voting on their adoption. He added that the Legislature needs to show the public “we’re here to get the business done of the people and show that we can come together and move forward.” He urged a yes vote.

But the Uniform Rules needed a two-thirds vote to pass, and with 26 yeas and 6 nays, it failed to pass the House on Saturday and will be up for a reconsideration vote, probably on Monday, when eight absent legislators are expected to return.

The Uniform Rules needed to be adopted and updated because Mason’s Manual, the handbook for parliamentary procedures in the Legislature, had been updated and the Uniform Rules needed to accept the new version.

All of Saturday’s in-the-weeds debate came on the heels of Friday’s death-match between Speaker Louise Stutes and Rep. Chris Kurka, who had worn a “Government Mandated Muzzle” to the House floor, only to be told he needed to remove his political statement mask and replace it with a plain one. Stutes, as the presiding officer, is granted that authority by Uniform Rules and Mason’s Manual.

So it was no surprise that when the adoption of those governing rules came up on Saturday, the conservative caucus of Eastman, Kurka, Ron Gillham, Ben Carpenter, Kevin McCabe and Sarah Vance would drive home their point that the presiding officer is breaking the rules.