Wednesday, August 27, 2025
Home Blog Page 644

Steve Goreham: Green energy — the greatest wealth transfer to the rich in history

By STEVE GOREHAM | MASTER RESOURCE

We are in the midst of history’s greatest wealth transfer. Government subsidized support for wind systems, solar arrays, and electric vehicles overwhelmingly benefits the wealthy members of society and rich nations. The poor and middle class pay for green energy programs with higher taxes and higher electricity and energy costs. Developing nations suffer environmental damage to deliver mined materials needed for renewables in rich nations.

Since 2000, the world has spent more than $5 trillion on green energy. More than 300,000 wind turbines have been erected, millions of solar arrays were installed, more than 25 million electric vehicles (EVs) have been sold, hundreds of thousands of acres of forest were cut down to produce biomass fuel, and about three percent of agricultural land is now used to produce biofuel for vehicles. The world spends about $1 trillion per year on green energy. Government subsidies run about $200 billion annually, with more than $1 trillion in subsidies spent over the last 20 years.

World leaders obsess over the need for a renewable energy transition to save the planet from human-caused global warming. Governments deliver an endless river of cash to promote adoption of green energy. The Inflation Reduction Act of 2022 provided $370 billion in subsidies and loans for renewables and EVs. But renewable subsidies and mandates overwhelmingly favor the rich members of society at the expense of the poor.

Wind systems receive production tax credits, property tax exemptions, and sometimes receive payments even when not generating electricity. Landowners receive as much as $8,000 per turbine each year from leases for wind systems on their land. Lease income can be quite high for a landowner with many turbines. In England, ordinary taxpayers pay hundreds of millions of pounds per year in taxes that are funneled as subsidies to wind companies and wealthy land owners.

In the US, 39 states currently have net metering laws. Net metering provides a credit for electricity generated by rooftop solar systems that is fed back into the grid. Solar generators typically get credits at the retail electricity rate, about 14 cents per kilowatt-hour. This is a subsidized rate, which is more than double the roughly five cents per kilowatt-hour earned by power plants. Apartment residents and homeowners that cannot afford to install rooftop solar pay higher electricity bills to subsidize homes that receive net metering credits. Rooftop solar owners also receive federal and state tax incentives, another wealth transfer from ordinary citizens.

US federal subsidies of up to $7,500 for each electric car purchased, along additional state subsidies, directly benefit EV buyers. The average price of an EV in the US last year was $66,000, which is out of reach for most drivers. A 2021 University of Chicago study found that California EV owners only drive 5,300 miles per year, less than half the mileage for a typical car. Most electric cars in the US are second cars for the rich.

A mid-size electric car needs a battery that weighs about a 1,000 pounds to provide acceptable driving range. Because of battery weight, EVs tend to be about 50 percent heavier than gasoline cars, which causes increased road damage. But EVs don’t pay the road tax included in the price of every gallon of gasoline. EVs should pay higher road taxes than traditional cars, but today this cost is borne by everyday gasoline car drivers.

Renewable systems require huge amounts of special metals. Electric car batteries need cobalt, nickel, and lithium to achieve high energy density and performance. Magnets in wind turbines require rare earth metals, such as neodymium and dysprosium. Large quantities of copper are essential for EV engines, batteries, wind and solar arrays, and electricity transmission systems to connect to remote wind and solar sites.

According to the International Energy Agency, an EV requires about six times the special metals of a gasoline or diesel car. A wind array requires more than ten times the metals of a natural gas power plant on a delivered-electricity basis. The majority of these metals are mined in developing countries.

Almost 70 percent of cobalt is mined in the Democratic Republic of the Congo. Indonesia produces more than 30 percent of the world’s nickel. Chile produces 28 percent of the copper. China produces 60 percent of the rare earth metals. These nations struggle with serious air and water pollution from mining operations. Workers in mines also suffer from poor working conditions and the use of forced labor and child labor practices. But apparently no cost is too great so that rich people in developed nations can drive a Tesla.

To top it off, the European Union recently approved a Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism (CBAM). The CBAM will tax goods coming from poor nations which aren’t manufactured using low-carbon processes. CBAM revenues will be a great source of funds for Europe’s green energy programs that benefit the wealthy.

In January, California, Connecticut, Hawaii, Illinois, Maryland, New York, and Washington proposed a wealth tax on billionaires. It’s interesting to note that all seven of these states mandate and heavily subsidize wind and solar arrays and electric vehicles, which transfer wealth from poor and middle-class residents to those same billionaires.

Steve Goreham, a policy advisor to The Heartland Institute, is a speaker, author, and researcher on environmental issues as well as an engineer and business executive. This column first ran at his own blog, Master Resource.

Tim Barto: The details that separate men from women

By TIM BARTO

Men can menstruate, give birth, and win NCAA women’s swimming championships, but the true test that differentiates between the sexes is in the details of conversation and observation.

A few days ago, I had lunch with a friend who announced his fourth grandchild had just been born. Patriarchal displays of congratulations ensued, and happiness abounded. The lunch was delicious and the conversation great. All well and good . . . until I reached home. I told my wife about the nice conversation, the jaeger schnitzel that was just like they have in Germany, the great things our friend was doing in his ministry, and, oh yeah, his daughter gave birth again yesterday.

“She did? Boy or girl?” my wife asked.

“Umm.”

“You didn’t ask him what sex the baby was!”

“Sure, I did,” I responded. And I did, in fact, ask that question. The answer just wasn’t stored in the memory banks. “It was a girl, I think.  Or a boy.  One or the other.”

“How do you not remember if the baby was a girl or boy?” Incredulous my wife was, although, honestly, she should know better by now.  We’ve been married 32 years. 

It was an all-too-familiar replay of last week’s conversation. Again, it stemmed from me having lunch, this time with a young man smitten with our daughter. I was there to make sure he was worthy of her, but I went alone. (Having passed the test, he soon gets to meet Mama for the real trial.)

“Is his hair color light or dark?”

“Umm.”

A slightly cocked head and terse lips were my wife’s only response to my lackluster reply. 

“Sort of a, you know, light-dark mix. Brownish in a blonde kind of way.”

“What was he wearing?”

A look of frustration greeted my wife’s stare, then she just turned and walked away. I gotta’ give her credit for a rather noteworthy act of restraint. Either I need to quit having lunches with guys, or I need to quit reporting on the lunches I have with guys, or I need to learn to remember the details, like colors. Colors are evidently at the top of the women-folk’s important details list — hair, eyes, house, coat, shoes. Names are up there, too – nieces, nephews, children of friends, that couple we met four months ago when visiting a new church. 

“So, I saw Kim at Fred Meyer yesterday … “

“Who is Kim again?” I was the one asking the question this time.

“You know, Dalton’s wife. We met them at that new church back in November?”

“We went to a new church in November?”

Only the whites of her eyes were visible, they were rolling so violently upwards. “She was wearing a long beige sweater. He had a vest and tie on.”

“Heh heh. Yeah, so how is Kim?”  

The detail minefield is exacerbated when your wife happens to be from a culture that calls every female friend over 18 “aunty” and where all the children of our friends earn the title “cousin.” We’ve visited people on no more than five occasions and my wife gets frustrated because I don’t know what their relationship to us is. So I practice.

“Aunty Liane is Aunty Wendy’s sister, right?”

“Wow, I’m proud of you, Honey.” My wife was, indeed, proud, but such success comes with a heavy price: more details. “And they have another sister – Aunty Lisa.”

“Right, Isao’s Mom,” I said confidently.

“No, Wendy is Isao’s Mom. Lisa’s son is Max. He’s the one attending the merchant marine academy.”

“Cool. I didn’t know that.”

“Yes, you did. You talked with him last visit. Wendy’s youngest son is attending there, too. They’re roommates.”

And on it goes. I have to fill out a scorecard each time we take a vacation.

Part of the problem, though, is that I simply forget to tell her the things I actually remember, such as my mom was discharged from the hospital, our nephew is getting pinned as a Warrant Officer, our friends’ kid (a cousin, of course) made All-American at UCLA. That kind of stuff. Eventually, I get around to it, but it just doesn’t impress me as something I should immediately yap about after I hang up the phone. My wife differs. 

And I know it’s a female thing. My guy friend – Ernie or Frank, or something like that – told me his wife does the same thing. And my newly married daughter commiserates with her mother about how our new son-in-law, Aaron (or Elijah, or Nebuchadnezzar – one of those Old Testament names), always forgets to give her details of their conversations.  

Women have this penchant for details, a biological need for bits of information about people and a desire to strangle us guys who don’t share the same penchant. So, if a man wants to claim himself a woman, he’d better master the art of expecting detailed information but being eternally disappointed when those expectations are shattered. 

Tim Barto is a former Naval intelligence Specialist who used to always try and anticipate questions his skipper would ask at the end of the brief. He is not so skilled at anticipating his wife’s questions when returning from lunch.

Russell Biggs: Anchorage Assembly has passed more than 30 emergency orders in three years. It’s time for change

By RUSSELL BIGGS

Between 1989 and 2019, the Anchorage Assembly passed five emergency ordinances. That was over the course of 30 years.

In the approximately three years since the outset of the Covid pandemic, the current lockstep Assembly members passed more than 30. 

The most recent “emergency” is related to a series of allegations made by the former municipal manager that resulted in the Assembly moving to grant special powers to the ombudsman. 

This is of particular concern because it grants, under emergency authority, the ombudsman immunity from lawsuits, while also altering the rules of attorney-client privilege (among other ”temporary” emergency modifications).

Usually, the reason for enacting emergency ordinances must be set out for specific reasons, yet the current allegations being made by the Assembly do not meet the definition of emergency in any form or fashion, and instead begs the question of why a regular, non-emergency ordinance was not created that allowed for public input?

The Assembly’s emergency ordinance implies that municipal code in regards to the ombudsman is currently in the process of being updated, arguing that “this internal matter regarding employees is really important” and that debatable urgency is somehow meant to be equivalent to an unforeseeable condition harming the public welfare on the scale of a global pandemic or natural disaster.

The Assembly’s ordinance also shows a clear level of detail and specificity that goes far beyond what is reasonable or necessary, by amending code to state: “A civil action may not be brought against the Ombudsman or a member of the Ombudsman’s staff for anything done, said, or omitted in performing the Ombudsman’s duties or responsibilities under this chapter.” 

Does that sound reasonable?

It is questionable, at best, whether the Municipality is legally capable of granting such immunity. It is also not necessary; the ombudsman is protected from personal liability already. Navigating that protection can be done through normal public processes and no adverse effects would be felt in the interim except to the political expediency the Assembly currently enjoys through a voting bloc that may change significantly in April. 

More important than the legal validity of an exclusive and broad immunity granted on an emergency basis is how the ordinance, discussed primarily in executive session, hamstrings the public in favor of the limited few in the legislative branch that have historically shown an astounding lack of transparency in producing records as required under the Alaska Public Records Act. As of this writing, Clerk Barbara Jones has settled two lawsuits for failure to provide the assembly’s records as required by law. 

The Assembly has also abused the executive session privilege by failing to release even the “reason why” their communications involving the formerly anonymous Alaska Democrats communications director were somehow protected under deliberative “privilege.”

By eliminating the normal two-meeting requirement required for changes to municipal code, the Assembly bypassed, again, the normal public process requirements which are designed to provide transparency and allow people to voice their opinions. That change invested publicly unvetted powers in one individual, and subsequently removed that power and oversight from the public.

By attempting to grant immunity to the ombudsman above and beyond what other municipal officials enjoy, the Assembly also restricted access to the courts while compromising public access to both the legislative and judicial branches of government. 

Anchorage citizens deserve better than a perpetual state of emergency, or rule by emergency decree. Without a change in April, at some point in the near future there will be no public process left, as this group of legislators have worked consistently to remove any of the public’s input (and even the public’s physical presence) from the government of Anchorage.  

Russell Biggs is a citizen watchdog keeping an eye on the Anchorage Assembly.

Bob Bird: Of treaties and the U.S. Constitution

By BOB BIRD

            “This Constitution, and the laws of the United States which shall be made in pursuance thereof; and all treaties made, or which shall be made, under the authority of the United States, shall be the supreme law of the land; and the judges in every state shall be bound thereby, anything in the constitution or laws of any state notwithstanding.”

So reads Article VI of the U. S. Constitution. Right now, the very sovereignty (which means “no higher authority”) of the United States is at risk, and Article VI is at the center of it.

The traitorous and lying dolt currently exercising the powers of the presidency, is negotiating a deal with the World Health Organization through an “executive agreement” over health powers that would have America submit to the dictates of global “health” bureaucrats. 

And, as usual, the fight of “original intent” v. “current interpretation” continues to rear its ugly head, causing disunity and confusion. Any fair reading of American history would tell a careful historian that the federal Constitution was never much of a unifying factor, and right from the beginning. The fact that the union of states endured numerous crises, both before and after the failed War for Southern Independence, is proof enough that the document’s interpretation, whether proper or phony, could lead to great trouble. 

And, of course, the misnamed “civil war” itself demonstrated that this disagreement of interpretation had the ability to lead to massive self-destruction still unmatched in our bloody history. After all, the South, along with many northern politicians, editors and even three former presidents, contended that secession was perfectly constitutional, and Lincoln just the opposite. 

A fair reading of Article VI would know the operative phrase: the laws which shall be made in pursuance of the Constitution. Ergo, laws made in defiance of the Constitution would be null and void, something Jefferson, Madison and Calhoun certainly understood with the doctrine of state nullification, which all three famously advocated.

But consider the obvious absurdity: would any constitution write into itself a mode of self-destruction, one that would forfeit the sovereignty not only of the federal but the state governments? And at the time (in 1788) when states were justly jealous of their sovereignty and fearful of a newly created central power?

What then, was the “original intent” of Article VI?

In the Treaty of Paris that ended the War for Independence, the British were extremely generous, not contending ownership of the lands west of the Appalachians, that they had won by conquest in the French and Indian War in the 1760s. The western American boundary was to extend to the Mississippi River.

In exchange the Americans conceded that the properties seized from American Loyalists (Tories) by state governments and torchlight mobs would be compensated to the survivors and their estates. Certainly, popular wisdom completely understood that to keep such neighbors in their midst would be directly harmful to not only the cause of independence, but to their own peace and safety. But just as certainly, the loss of the Loyalists’ property rights, if not their very lives, was also unjust.

This, however, led to tremendous difficulties. Many states refused to be party to such a compensation. Not all confiscations were authorized, but a result of mob rule. The states had already been greatly pressed, in blood and treasure, to win independence, and compensating the losing side in a war seemed ridiculous. In fact, the people would certainly resist local taxation done for this object, and so states wrote into their constitutions, charters and laws the guarantees that no such thing would be allowed to happen.

And how could it ever be collected, anyway? Many Tories had gone west into the Ohio Valley and were eager to keep their previous loyalties to the crown a secret. Others had found refuge in maritime Canada and even England. How would they be identified? Who were their rightful descendants, entitled to estate compensation? And where were they now?

The failure to compensate Loyalists contributed to the next war with England in 1812. Because of this failure, the British — playing tit-for-tat — kept possession of American soil and the forts in the Great Lakes, trading with the western tribes, and ostensibly using the wealth from this resource to compensate the estates of the Loyalists, a full generation after independence.

Thus, Article VI was a noble, if failed, effort for the federal government to abide its treaty obligations contracted under the Articles of Confederation. It was a signal sent to the potentates of Europe that America would be a responsible member of the world community. Just as likely, the federal government knew all along that it would never be enforced, but as the Constitution acknowledged that all acts and laws made under the Articles would be honored, it had to do so with treaties.

It would be bad enough if the health powers were surrendered to an international entity even after a treaty was approved by the U.S. Senate, which requires 67 of the 100 members. In a culture that still possessed common sense, the states would rightly resist such a nefarious treaty, and right down to counties and municipalities, where the authentic health powers exist. But now local government has been compromised by the federal inflation purse, with a trillion dollars’ worth of “free” money that they are fully aware has become a vital source of revenue. 

With this confidence, even if unfounded, the charlatans in Washington would tell us that a mere “executive agreement” would have the same power, simply because, well, that is how the American presidency has morphed into a dictatorship.

The Covid Capers are not over. We face a looming nightmare of the first order.

Bob Bird is chair of the Alaskan Independence Party and the host of a talk show on KSRM radio, Kenai.

Bob Bird: Morphing of the pro-life movement

Willow decision: Will Biden fumble the ball?

15

Next week, the Biden Administration is expected to announce one of the most important decisions for the economic viability of Alaska: Will the Department of Interior allow the ConocoPhillips project known as Willow to develop an oil field in the northeastern corner of the National Petroleum Reserve–Alaska?

The final supplemental environmental impact statement was released on Feb. 6, which means the Administration can announce its final decision 30 days later. Must Read Alaska sources say the decision is probably not going to be announced this week, for scheduling reasons, but could be revealed by mid-March.

Interior Secretary Deb Haaland has expressed concerns about the carbon impact of the Willow project, even though the Bureau of Land Management, a division of the department, recommends the three-drilling-pad option called “Alternative E.” That was a reduction from the ConocoPhillips proposal, but still economically viable. Haaland was signaling that she is in the “not inclined to approve” camp.

The Biden Administration could, at its discretion, OK just one or two drilling pads, and thus make the entire project uneconomic. However, it would be unusual for President Biden, Secretary Haaland, and the Interior Department to select a different alternative than the one proposed by one of its own agencies.

Last week, Sen. Lisa Murkowski, speaking to the Alaska Legislature, took a cautious approach on Willow. She seemed to be trying to lower the expectations of Alaskans for an expected Record of Decision that would be adverse to the state.

If the decision goes against ConocoPhillips and Alaska, then it’s because politics took precedence over the scientific process, Murkowski told the Legislature.

While Congress has been out for the past two weeks, Environmentalists have been swarming Washington, where they have a lot of friends in the various agencies that will meet with them at the drop of a hat. Much of the Department of Interior is run by Biden appointees brought over from organizations such as EarthJustice, the Sierra Club, the Wilderness Society, the Center for Biological Diversity, and the Audubon Society. Environmentalists from nonprofits now run the Interior Department as an extension of their work outside of government — they cycle in and out of these jobs depending on who is in the White House, going from the environmental nongovernmental organizations back into government and then back again to the ENGOs.

These environmentalists call the Willow Project a “carbon bomb” and say all the work they have done to take down petroleum development would be undone by this one project, which would undo the Biden progress on their climate goals.

Rep. Mary Peltola of Alaska has tried to play to the environmentalists by calling the Willow Project “gap oil,” a way to fill our energy needs until America can get to a 100% renewable energy future.

ConocoPhillips first acquired the Willow leases from the federal government in 1999. After nearly two decades, the project was announced by ConocoPhillips in 2017 and the permitting process began in 2018.

At its peak production, Willow is estimated to produce 180,000 barrels of oil per day to strengthen America’s energy security, with 600 million barrels of oil equivalent over the life of the project. It’s still a modest amount, considering that about 500,000 barrels a day now flows through the Trans Alaska Pipeline System

Willow is expected to create as many as 2,500 jobs during construction and 300 permanent jobs. The Bureau of Land Management says that Willow could bring between $8 billion and $17 billion in new revenue for the federal government, the State of Alaska, the North Slope Borough, and communities in and around NPR-A.

It’s been a long time coming for Alaska, which hasn’t seen a project this big in 20 years. ConocoPhillips acquired the first Willow-area leases in 1999 and began the development permitting process in 2018. The project, which has spanned five presidential administrations, has had more than 215 days of public comments, 25 public meetings, and has survived various lawsuits from environmental groups — some of which have people now running the Department of Interior.

Willow, proponents argue, is the most environmentally friendly oil project on the planet. Oil from Venezuela is 18 times dirtier than an average American oil project, and yet the Biden Administration is allowing 100,000 barrels per day to be shipped from Venezuela to the United States. chevron is now shipping 100K a day from Venezuela to the u.s. the willow project is 180,000 a day. the truth is, if they don’t pass the project.

March is the month when Alaska will learn if the Biden Administration will honor the 49th State’s economy, or will continue to suppress it, in favor of the Green New Deal promises made by the administration to the environmental industry lobbyists and campaign bundlers.

Puck drop: Congressional hockey match Wednesday will raise funds for charity

It’s the Lobbyists vs. the Lawmakers on Wednesday, as the Congressional Hockey Challenge takes to the ice in Arlington, Virginia.

The match, which is a benefit event for charity, is in its 13th year. One team comes from the lobbyist world, representing a spectrum of interests, this year mainly in the private sector. The other team is made up of lawmakers, congressional staffers, and members of the Biden Administration. Each team has 20 players.

Congressman Tom Emmer of Minnesota will be on the congressional team, as will Alaskan Truman Reed, former staffer to Congressman Don Young, and now an aide to Rep. Monica de la Cruz of Texas. Emmers played in college for the University of Alaska Fairbanks. Reed played NCAA hockey for Providence College.

A reception on Tuesday night will feature the Stanley Cup, a few players from the NHL, and Must Read Alaska has learned that Willie O’Ree (the Jackie Robinson of hockey), will be playing a role on game night. Will he drop the puck? The Congressional Hockey Challenge puck drops at 7 pm, March 1 at the Medstar Capitals Iceplex in Arlington, Virginia.

The hockey match has raised over $1 million for charities since the tradition started in 2008. This year’s charity recipient is the Tampa Warriors, a group of disabled and wounded war veterans who play hockey.

Tickets can be purchased at this link.

The roster for the Lawmakers team, so far:

Hon. Mike QuigleyIL-05
Hon. Tom EmmerMN-06
Hon. Larry BucshonIN-08
Garett DonovanRep. Keating
Rob WagenerRep. Fitzgerald
Amber MooreSen. Durbin
Nick LunnenborgRep. Fischbach
Will BensurSen. Marshall
Will NeitzelCommittee on House Administration
Rob MacGregorCommittee on Natural Resources
Tim ReganClerk of the House
Joe GollingerRep. Harshbarger
Ian BennittCommittee on Armed Services
Joel BrubakerSen. Capito
Kevin RodgersRep. Malliotakis
Austin YagerRep. Vasquez
Truman ReedRep. de la Cruz

For the Lobbyists, the team includes:

Trevor HangerForbes Tate
Max FenkellJoby Aviation
Nick LewisUPS
Brian CohenCohen Strategic Alliances
Andrew MillsAudubon
Matt MikaTysons
Michelle MacGregorOrrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe
Justin WoormesterBNSF
Jon JukuriNCSL
George LoweAmerican Gas Association
Dan MartiniBank of America
Tory MazollaOrsted
Robert LandJet Blue
Chris GullotBridgestone
Matthew FlynnBradley
Ben MarterAPI
Andy EmersonCorvias
Matt SatterleyNACTA
Matt GehlmanMicrosoft
Rick MurphyForbes Tate
Jeff BurtonBurton Strategies
Air LiquideJoe Fawell
Patrick OttenhoffVISA

Who has Don Young’s old office in the Rayburn Building?

For over a decade, the late Alaska Congressman Don Young held the spacious Room 2314 in the Rayburn House Office Building, a short distance from the Capitol, accessible by the Capitol subway.

After the death of the Dean of the House on March 18, 2022, the office remained assigned to Alaska’s at-large seat, which was then vacant, except for orphaned staff, until September, when Rep. Mary Peltola was sworn in to complete Young’s term, and then she was able to remain in that office for the remaining months.

Then came the new term in January, and Peltola was assigned to Room 153 in the Cannon Office Building, where she has the House minimum of three rooms and a storage room, all of about 800 feet, and a shared bathroom down the hall.

Young’s office, 1,800 square feet with a much-coveted conference room and its own bathroom, has been turned over to Democrat Rep. Sheila Jackson Lee of Texas, one of the most ardent gun-rights opponents in the House. Jackson Lee, who has served since 1995, has proposed a gun control bills that would create a national firearm registry, and set a minimum gun purchase age of 21. She has an 8% rating from the National Rifle Association.

The irony in that is Congressman Young was on the board of the NRA and in 2014 earned the organization’s highest rating — A+, for protecting Americans’ Second Amendment rights.

Rep. Sheila Jackson Lee

While Congressman Young was known for his bipartisanship in the House, Rep. Jackson Lee votes with the Democrat Party, as does Rep. Mary Peltola of Alaska. Peltola and Jackson share almost identical voting records.

Before Young had decorated the Rayburn office with all kinds of Alaskana, including the heads of animals he had killed and a brown bear hide, 2314 was the place to find Wisconsin Democrat Rep. David Obey, who served 40 years in the House, from 1969 to 2011.

The current Dean of the House, Congressman Hal Rogers, a Republican from Kentucky, has served in the House since 1981. His office is 2406 Rayburn House Office Building, just down the hall from 2314.

Alaska went from having one of the largest offices in capitol complex, to a diminutive office on the main hallway of a building that is undergoing a massive renovation. But everyone in Washington, D.C. has to start somewhere, and Peltola, starting as a freshman Democrat lawmaker in a Republican-run House, is starting at the bottom.

Ground Zero: Energy Department changes mind, says Covid-19 was probably from a China lab leak

You can call it a Chinese spy balloon, but for years, the American public was discouraged from calling Covid-19 the China Virus. That was racist, the elites said.

But the federal government is coming around. The Wall Street Journal reported Sunday that another agency has changed its position on the origin of Covid-19, which was probably starting to spread in China as early as November of 2019. A new classified report provided to the White House and key members of Congress says the virus was a leak from a research lab.

The Department of Energy had earlier labeled its position on the Wuhan lab theory as “undecided.” Now, both the Energy Department and the FBI conclude the lab leak from a Chinese research facility is most likely the correct theory. Four other agencies are still saying that the virus was the result of natural transmission, and another two agencies are still in the “undecided” category, according to the Wall Street Journal.

“The Energy Department’s conclusion is the result of new intelligence and is significant because the agency has considerable scientific expertise and oversees a network of U.S. national laboratories, some of which conduct advanced biological research,” the newspaper wrote.

“The Energy Department made its judgment with ‘low confidence,’ according to people who have read the classified report.

“The FBI previously came to the conclusion that the pandemic was likely the result of a lab leak in 2021 with ‘moderate confidence’ and still holds to this view.

“The FBI employs a cadre of microbiologists, immunologists and other scientists and is supported by the National Bioforensic Analysis Center, which was established at Fort Detrick, Md., in 2004 to analyze anthrax and other possible biological threats.”

The FBI, which came to the conclusion a year earlier, has a wide network of microbiologists, immunologists, and scientists on its staff, and is also sharing information with the National Bioforensic Analysis Center, established in 2004 to research anthrax and other possible biological threats, the Journal reported.

Over the past three years, social media, academicians and others have said the theory that Covid was leaked from a lab in China constituted misinformation, disinformation, xenophobia, and yes, racism.

The Yale University School of Medicine even published a list of do’s and don’ts for people, which encouraged professionals to not have honest conversations about Covid. The list included:

DO: Talk about the new coronavirus disease (COVID-19)”
DO NOT: Attach locations or ethnicity to the disease; this is not a “Wuhan Virus,” “Chinese Virus,” or “Asian Virus.” The official name for the disease was deliberately chosen to avoid stigmatization.”

By warning people from even referring to it as the Wuhan Virus, the academic and government ruling class put its stamp of disapproval on legitimate inquiry as to the origins. Those who called it the Wuhan Virus or China Virus were routinely shamed by the Left and called, at a minimum, racist.

NPR, where much of the ruling class of America get its news, said it was virtually impossible for the virus to have been leaked from a lab. In NPR’s report in 2020, the government-sponsored news organization wrote:

“Virus researchers say there is virtually no chance that the new coronavirus was released as result of a laboratory accident in China or anywhere else.

“The assessment, made by more than half-a-dozen scientists familiar with lab accidents and how research on coronaviruses is conducted, casts doubt on recent claims that a mistake may have unleashed the coronavirus on the world,” NPR reported. Then it said that President Trump was peddling a false theory.

“The accident theory has been advanced by the Trump administration in recent weeks. Earlier this month, a set of State Department cables leaked to The Washington Post pointed to U.S. safety concerns at labs in Wuhan, the city where the virus emerged. Intelligence agencies are currently assessing the possibility of an accident, and last Wednesday, President Trump promised “a very thorough examination” of events.

“‘I will tell you, more and more, we’re hearing the story,”‘ Trump said on April 15 [2020] of the theory that the virus came from labs in Wuhan.”

But Trump Derangement Syndrome had set in in newsrooms across America and NPR was no exception:

“But after corresponding with 10 leading scientists who collect samples of viruses from animals in the wild, study virus genomes and understand how lab accidents canhappen, NPR found that an accidental release would have required a remarkable series of coincidences and deviations from well-established experimental protocols,” NPR wrote.

NPR receives less that 1% of its funding directly from the federal government, but about 10% of its funding from federal, state, and local governments indirectly, according to InfluenceWatch.org.

Facebook, one of the largest distributors of current event news, removed or edited millions of comments that linked the virus to Wuhan, China. Finally, in 2021, the company changed its policy:

“In light of ongoing investigations into the origin of COVID-19 and in consultation with public health experts, we will no longer remove the claim that COVID-19 is man-made or manufactured from our apps,” a spokesman for Facebook said. Just a year earlier the company bragged that it put warnings on 50 million “pieces of content related to Covid-19.” The damage had already been done, with millions of users in the shadow-ban category, without even knowing their posts were not being seen on Facebook. Twitter had similar policies for sharing information.

“When people saw those warning labels, 95% of the time they did not go on to view the original content,” Facebook reported, explaining its successes in censorship. Whenever Facebook labels an article false by its company or its independent “fact checkers,” the social media platform will hide the content from everyone, without the author of that consent even being aware that no one is seeing their post.

Read how Facebook suppresses points of view at the company’s own explainer page.

Read the Director of National Intelligence unclassified report on Covid origins from August, 2022, at this government link.

Read the 2020 report from NPR that debunked the China lab leak theory.

Read MedPageToday’s 2021 editorial discrediting of former CDC Director Dr. Robert Redfield’s theory that the virus was the result of gain-of-function research in China.

Read the summary of the research commissioned by Sen. Richard Burr, R-N.C., released in October by the minority oversight staff of the U.S. Senate Committee on Health, Education, Labor & Pensions, which concludes that the COVID-19 pandemic was “more likely than not, the result of a research-related incident.”

Anchorage’s Identity Inc. is engaged in puberty blocker treatments, but a Senate bill may put group in legal peril

41

In Anchorage, Identity Inc. is leading the charge to convince children to transition from one gender identity to another.

In material published on its own website, the gender identity group says that although hormone treatments are “off label” for gender transition purposes, they have been used safely for years, a claim that is disputed by some who have gone through the treatments and suffered long-term consequences.

Identity Inc. is an Alaska nonprofit community center and health clinic that provides resources, programs, and health care for the LGBTQIA2S+ and allied community, according to its website.

Identity Inc. recently posted consent forms for various chemical treatments for gender dysphoria.

But its hormone treatments for youth may put the group in legal jeopardy.

Missouri Sen. Josh Hawley has introduced a Senate bill that would allow people who were harmed by gender-transition procedures as minors to bring lawsuits against the participating individuals and entities.

The bill, “Protecting Our Kids from Child Abuse Act,” holds medical professionals and clinics liable for damages until 30 years after a patient turns 18.

“”What the American people are seeing take place at pediatric gender clinics in St. Louis and across the nation is appalling. Children who are harmed by these dangerous procedures, which are often irreversible and sterilizing, will now be able to fight back against those who perpetrated their abuse. And federal taxpayers will no longer be forced to foot the bill for abusive treatment,” Hawley said in a press release.

Identity Inc, has published consent form on its website to assist pre-teens in their gender identity change, starting with hormone treatments. The consent form presents itself as an authoritative document that has several places for youth and guardians to sign.

The consent form asks youthful patients to acknowledge that “using this medication to block puberty in transgender youth is an off-label use. This means it is not approved by the Food and Drug Administration for this specific use. However it has been used for many years to block puberty in children who started puberty earlier than is healthy. I know that using a puberty blocker is based on the judgment and experience of our health care provider and is supported by the Society of Pediatric Endocrinology.”

The Identity Inc group also asks youthful patients to sign that they understand that, “I know that the side effects and the safety of these medicines are not completely understood. There may be long-term risks that are not yet known.”

View the consent forms at this Identity Inc. link.

The Senate bill, Protecting Our Kids from Child Abuse Act may put groups like Identity Inc. out of the gender-affirming business. The bill would allow a person to sue a gender-transition procedure performed on them when they were minors. The bill also would prohibit federal funding to any pediatric gender clinic, to any university or hospital that is affiliated with a pediatric gender clinic, and for any gender-transition procedure performed on minors.

Already, one well-known young person who went through a gender transition has “de-transitioned,” and is now suing the medical providers who did the procedure on her when she was younger.

Chloe Cole, 18, calls herself a “former trans kid” who de-transitioned after undergoing years of puberty blockers and a double mastectomy at age 15. She now travels the country on a mission to stop the transitioning of kids, a practice that Identity Inc. is now assisting in.

“I’m planning to keep doing this until it stops,” Cole told Catholic News Service.

Earlier this month, Sen. Hawley announced an investigation into whistleblower allegations of child abuse and potential malpractice at The Washington University Transgender Center at St. Louis Children’s Hospital.

View the full bill text here.