Monday, October 20, 2025
Home Blog Page 641

Dunleavy’s parental rights bill gets no love from LGBT Alaskans or teachers during committee hearing

During the first House Education Committee hearing for House Bill 105, the governor’s Parental Rights Act, there was a long line of people testifying — and nine out of 10 of them opposed the bill. The phone lines were packed, with 154 calling in, and 125 getting through to testify. The committee also got 226 emails opposing the bill, and about 125 emails supporting it.

Educators from across the state told the committee that they are the ones who deserve to be able to keep children’s sexual secrets from their parents, because parents cannot not be trusted, and parents may even be harmful for children who are not heterosexual. LBGTQ children could be abused if their parents know about their sexual identity, the teachers said. Educators also said they are the only safe place for these children.

A few of the testifiers who object to House Bill 105, which protects children from aggressive sexual identity politics of schools.

Some of the testifiers roamed the halls of the Capitol and took photos of themselves giving vulgar hand signs intended for the governor. Mainstream media reporters have chosen to call it the “don’t say gay” bill or the “anti-trans bill.”

LGBTQ Alaskans, many who spoke to trauma they had experienced as children, including sexual abuse, also said the bill is wrong. One after another, they told the Education Committee that boys should be able to use girls’ bathrooms and locker rooms if they identify as girls. They may not have actually read the bill, which provides for an any-gender single-use bathroom in schools to handle the needs of children who are gender confused.

Most of the testifiers were polite, and for the most part respected the committee’s role in hearing the public’s viewpoints on the bill. The committee hearing was chaired by Rep. Jamie Allard, who will bring the matter back for more public testimony in coming weeks.

Some of the testifiers at Thursday’s HB 105 hearing.

HB 105 would require that schools grant parental access to school records, such as secret names and pronouns that teachers are currently, in some instances, keeping from parents. The bill requires that districts get parents’ permission before instructing them on matters of sex, and gender identity. Currently, there are opt-out laws, but this bill would require an affirmative opt-in by parents before these highly controversial subjects are discussed.

Such debates are taking place all over the country, as parents have been alerted to the changing curricula that is incompatible with many family values.

Dunleavy appoints new members to boards of Fish, Game

Gov. Mike Dunleavy has made several appointments to two important boards in Alaska — the Board of Fisheries, and the Board of Game:

Board of Fisheries

Gerad Godfrey (Eagle River) is a chairman of the FirstNet Tribal Working Group, a board member of Kizhuyak Oil Sales Inc., the treasurer of Native Public Media, a council member for the Native Village of Port Lions, and a director of the Connecting Alaska Consortium. 

Greg Svendsen (Anchorage) is a third-generation Alaskan, avid hunter, and fisherman. He is a member of the Barker Ranch Board of Directors, and leads sponsored duck hunts for combat veterans. 

Mike Wood (Talkeetna) is a commercial fisherman in the Upper Cook Inlet and the Matanuska-Susitna Borough Fish and Wildlife Commission chair, and is the vice chair of the Alaska Department of Fish & Game Upper Susitna Advisory Committee.

Retiring from the Board of Fisheries on June 30 are McKenzie Mitchell, John Jensen, and Mike Heimbuch.

David Lorring

Board of Game

Jake Fletcher (Talkeetna) owns and operates a small guiding operation on Kodiak National Wildlife Refuge and the Kenai National Wildlife Refuge. He is being reappointed and has served on the Board of Game since 2020. 

Stanley (Stash) Hoffman (Bethel) is reappointed and has served on the Board of Game since 2008 and had his Assistant Guide License from 1997 to 2017 and his Commercial Fishing Permit from 1983 to 2014. 

David Lorring (Fairbanks) is an active hunter and fisherman for subsistence. He is a licensed falconer and president of the North American Falconers Association. In addition, he is a commercial pilot with Wright Air Service in Fairbanks. He is a North American Versatile Hunting Dog Association member and hunts upland game birds with his three German Wirehair Pointers.

Retiring from the board on June 30 is Lynn Keogh.

Downing: Anchorage, vote for your homes, wallets, and most of all, your values

By SUZANNE DOWNING

There is no sugarcoating the truth: Anchorage has for the last 10 years declined. Crime has risen. Homelessness is greater, more visible, and more damaging to the city than at any time in living memory. Anchorage taxpayers are paying more to a municipal government that returns less.

This week, residents can stop bellyaching and do something about it.

How did this decline happen? The reasons are many, and require a telling too long here. Suffice it to say, we must face a hard truth: The people of Anchorage voted for the leadership that degraded Alaska’s largest city on every visible measurement worth tallying.

Ethan Berkowitz was elected, then overwhelmingly reelected, to run City Hall in the image of his hometown in California, and his legacy, aside from his ill-advised selfies, will be downtown Anchorage being ground zero for a metastasizing population of vagrants who harry law-abiding residents and visitors.

Berkowitz is gone, but he did not act alone. The former mayor enjoyed a supermajority bloc on the Anchorage Assembly that enabled a litany of questionable activities to happen, running roughshod over due process and any legitimate concerns the people of this town had. 

Small businesses were shuttered after years of being clobbered by the virtue signaling city leadership trying to look tough on Covid. The leaders were tough on diners and bar patrons, and tough on virtually anything and anybody, other than a homeless vagrant conducting bodily functions on city sidewalks or parks trails. 

We now have just one electrical company through a sketchy buyout; we have a gasoline tax imposed on anyone foolish enough to drive and fill up within the boundaries of Anchorage. We have a tax on alcohol that is diverted to a host of pet projects, including funding for jobs held by elected members of the Assembly. We have a growing inventory of former hotels, health clubs, and facilities to house people, but no plan to pay for any of its operations. 

Changes occasionally happened, sure. The surprise victory of Mayor Dave Bronson upset the planned coronation of heir-to-be Forrest Dunbar in 2021. Bronson, riding the Save Anchorage wave of anger at an Assembly and Berkowitz who went too far, was able to claw back City Hall, at least.

The past two years have been a demonstration of the old adage “‘”democracy is best kept from the voters.” A hostile Assembly, angered that their interrupted plans for continuing business as usual, went to war with the mayor, and Bronson occasionally did himself no favors (when fighting a city machine, backed by the hostile press, you can’t afford to mess up, even a little bit.)

So here we are, with ballots for our local mail-in election once again out to hundreds of thousands of voters. And this year, a majority of the Anchorage Assembly’s seats are up before the people. 

Some are not running again: Suzanne LaFrance, who defied political gravity by being a crypto-liberal in conservative South Anchorage, is stepping down, some say, to look at taking on the mayor next year.

Austin Quinn-Davidson, another of Berkowitz’ loyal foot soldiers and as Acting Mayor issued the final closure of businesses during COVID, is retreating into a retirement of simple political activism.

Both seats are open with strong, commonsense candidates. Their strength is evidence by the massive firepower the liberal bastion of the ADN is unleashing on both Brian Flynn and Rachel Riess.

Riess’ chances to reclaim a traditionally conservative seat are being assaulted by Democrats who were playing footsie with Ries’ opponent, who has pretended to be a non-partisan, while enjoying almost every penny of donations and volunteers coming from the good old Democratic machine. If conservatives actually vote, Riess should have that seat.

Flynn is the candidate most disruptive to the establishment because his opponent appeared ordained for what was perceived as a “safe” liberal Assembly seat. Both Flynn and his wife have been smeared by the press, by the most liberal members of the Assembly, and by activists for baseless accusations. They are using another page in the old politics playbook: When neither truth nor logic is on your side, simply yell. And judging by the yelling, West Anchorage Democrats are scared of Flynn. 

Finally, there is a challenger in midtown named Travis Szanto. Politics lately has been the fortress of the connected, the wannabe politicos. Szanto is none of that: He is a carpenter who made a name for himself with his hands. Szanto is trying to unseat one of Berkowitz’ leading lieutenants. And humble, respectful Szanto has momentum. 

But none of this matters unless action is taken. For the past decade, conservatives and even moderates have pitched and moaned about the liberal takeover of this city; about the lack of good candidates to vote for; about a lack of momentum.

Those complaints are now moot. Good men and women have stepped up to the plate and are catching hell for it. If Anchorage has any hope in stopping the Assembly from ramming more bad laws down the throats of its residents, voters have to stop whining, and do what winning teams do: take the field and let the scoreboard do the telling. Get out and vote. Return your ballot by mail, or vote in person at the designated locations. 

Whatever you do, vote. If the name Riess, Flynn, or Szanto (or Leigh Sloan, Scott Myers, or Spencer Moore) is on your ballot, mark it, remembering the businesses that went under, the gas taxes you are paying, the shelters that never are enough, the crime that never ends, and the price you will continue to pay otherwise for liberals’ dreams of creating San Francisco of the north.

Have I said it enough? Vote. 

Suzanne Downing is publisher of Must Read Alaska.

Allen Hippler: Repeal the ’80th Percentile Rule’

By ALLEN HIPPLER

Alaskans have a huge opportunity: We can eliminate an unnecessary regulation that has caused price inflation and turmoil in the healthcare market in Alaska. This regulation was put into place as a well-intentioned consumer protection but has quickly evolved into a major factor driving up costs for healthcare, impacting virtually all Alaskans.

We are speaking of the so called 80th Percentile Rule, which is a regulation enacted in 2004 that is unique to Alaska. It sets a minimum reimbursement level for “out of network” claims. The purpose of this minimum price is to protect consumers against “surprise billing.”  The way this works is that insurance companies must pay medical providers at the 80th percentile of charges.

Unfortunately, one can imagine how rates would be set if a provider controls at least 21% of the market, thereby automatically setting the 80th percentile. As it turns out, many specialists in Alaska actually do have that level of control over their areas.  

As early as 2011, the Milliman report concluded: “Since many providers have over 20% of their market share, this implies that those providers can ensure that their charges are below the 80th percentile…”  

In such a scenario, what would one expect to happen, particularly with specialty areas such as cardiology, urology, or orthopedics? In Alaska, we have seen these specialty areas command a vast premium compared to any other place in the world. Consider what the 2019 Oliver Wyman study showed:  In 2017, cardiology reimbursement was 627% of Medicare fee for service standards, compared to Seattle’s 165%. Compare that with areas where no single provider controls over 20% of the market, such as ophthalmology for example: reimbursement in 2017 was 192% of Medicare, compared to Seattle’s 120%.

Such an off balance system in Alaska for specialty services has outsize impact. Even though the impacts of this rule are concentrated in a few specialties, those high costs put a drag on the entire system. In 2018, an ISER study here in Alaska concluded that, “The share of the overall increase in expenditures that we attribute to the 80thpercentile rule is between 8.61% and 24.65%.”

Finally, now that the Federal No Surprises Act is in place, there is a better solution to address the “surprise billing” issue. This federal law starts at the 50th percentile, which softens the price distortions that we have seen in Alaska by using the 80th percentile.

The solution to all this is simple.  Repeal the 80th Percentile Rule. The special interests are out in force to protect their high margins. We can stand against the special interests by undoing the damage we have caused ourselves, and reversing this harmful regulation.  

Allen Hippler is a former member of the Alaska Health Care Commission.

Top officials face scrutiny over drag queen story hours, burlesque shows on military bases

Defense Secretary Lloyd Austin told the House Armed Services Committee on Wednesday the military does not fund drag queen shows on military bases. Such drag shows are increasingly occurring around military bases, along with events for children such as Drag Queen Story Hour.

During a committee hearing on the Pentagon’s budget Wednesday, Rep. Matt Gaetz, R-Fla., grilled both Austin and Gen. Mark Milley, chair of the Joint Chiefs, to address these events.

The $842 billion Pentagon budget was the topic of the hearing that brought questions from Gaetz about how ready the military is and what its priorities actually are.

“How much taxpayer money goes to fund drag queen story hours on military bases?” Gaetz asked.

“Listen, drag shows are not something that the Department of Defense supports or funds,” Austin replied.

But Gaetz listed off a number of drag activities around bases, starting with one that had been planned in Germany, but was canceled after public condemnation. “Then also at Malmstrom Air Force Base outside of Great Falls, Montana, you had a drag queen story hour for kids. At the Joint Base Langley-Eustis, you put on a drag queen story hour on a Saturday for the first-ever kid-friendly “Diversity-Equity-Inclusion Summer Festival.” And at Nellis Air Force Base, you had the “Drag You Nellis” on June 17.”

“Why are they happening on military bases?” Gaetz asked. “I just showed you the evidence. Why are they happening?”

“I will say again,” Austin said, with strained patience. “This is not something we support or fund.”

“So you think ‘hosting’ a drag queen story hour on a military base isn’t ‘supporting’ the drag queen story hour?” Gaetz continued.

“I stand by what I just said,” Austin said.

“You may stand by it but it’s belied by the evidence over and over again,” Gaetz said.

Milley had a different response than Austin: “I’d like to take a look at those myself and find out what actually is going on there because that’s the first I’m hearing about that kind of stuff. I’d like to take a look at those because I don’t agree with those. I think those things shouldn’t be happening.”

Milley didn’t admit to knowing about it raises a concern about whether he was honest with the committee. In 2021, Nellis Air Force Base near Las Vegas hosted a drag queen show to demonstrate its commitment to diversity and inclusion. The event was well publicized by Newsweek and other publications two years ago.

A spokesperson for the base told Newsweek the base “is committed to providing and championing an environment that is characterized by equal opportunity, diversity, and inclusion,” and said “base leaders remain supportive of events and initiatives that reinforce the Air Force’s emphasis on diversity and inclusion toward recognizing the value every one of our airmen brings to the team.”

According to a report in the blog Task and Purpose, “The event was planned by the Nellis Air Force Base Pride committee, which is composed of volunteers from across the base focused on diversity and inclusion initiatives. It was sponsored by the Nellis Top 3, a private group meant to “enhance the morale, esprit de corps, of all enlisted personnel assigned to the [99th Air Base] Wing and to facilitate cooperation between members of the top three enlisted grades, according to the group’s Facebook page, which is now a private page.

Military readiness has become an increasing concern, as enlistments are not keeping up. The Army missed its recruiting target last year by about 15,000, according to Stars and Stripes. The Army sought 60,000 new recruits in 2022 but enlisted only 45,000. For 2023, the service is aiming even higher — for 65,000 new members.

“Fewer than 25% of all young Americans between the ages of 17 and 24 qualify academically and physically to serve in the military, according to recent Pentagon data. Many of them can’t pass the Armed Services Vocational Aptitude Battery, a test that measures potential recruits’ aptitude and fitness to serve,” the publication said in February.

Prosperity map: Alaska GDP grew in fourth quarter of 2022

Real gross domestic product increased in 46 states and the District of Columbia in the fourth quarter of 2022, with the percent change in real GDP ranging from 7.0% in Texas to –4.3% in South Dakota, according to statistics released Friday by the U.S. Bureau of Economic Analysis.

Gross domestic product is a calculation of the total market value of all the finished goods and services produced within a jurisdiction’s borders. The United States has the highest GDP in the world, at $20.89 trillion, followed by China at $14.72 trillion, and Japan at $4.9 trillion. Russia is far down the World Bank’s GDP list, coming in 11th at $1.7 trillion.

Alaska’s GDP increased by 4.1% in the fourth quarter, among the higher range of all 50 states for the quarter. But annually in 2022, Alaska saw a real GDP decrease of -2.4%, the lowest in the nation. Across the nation, the annual rate was 2.1% growth.

Annual GDP changes from 2021 to 2022.

Real GDP increased in 15 of the 23 industry groups for which the agency prepares preliminary annual state estimates. Professional, scientific, and technical services; information; and real estate and rental and leasing were the leading contributors to the increase in real GDP nationally.

  • Professional, scientific, and technical services increased in 49 states and the District of Columbia. This industry was the leading contributor to the increase in 13 states and the District of Columbia, including Colorado and New York the states with the seventh and eighth-largest increases.
  • The information industry increased in 47 states and the District of Columbia. This industry was the leading contributor to the increase in eight states including Texas, the state with the fifth-largest increase.
  • The real estate and rental and leasing industry increased in 43 states and the District of Columbia. This industry was the leading contributor to the increase in six states including Idaho and Florida, the states with the first and third-largest increases.
  • The mining industry decreased in 28 states. This industry was the leading contributor to the decreases in Alaska, North Dakota, Oklahoma, and Wyoming, the states with the first, fourth, fifth, and sixth-largest decreases, according to the Bureau of Economic Analysis report released on Friday.
Personal income growth fourth quarter 2022.

Personal income, in current dollars, increased in 48 states and the District of Columbia in the fourth quarter of 2022, with the percent change ranging from 15.3% in Massachusetts to –2.5% in Colorado. Alaska’s personal income grew 6.1%. For the entire year, current-dollar personal income increased in 49 states and the District of Columbia.

Facebook murder: Two young adults, one juvenile indicted for brutal killing of elderly Alaskan in Klawock

A Ketchikan grand jury has indicted two young adults and one 17-year-old on multiple charges Thursday for the death of 80-year-old Lincoln Peratrovich on March 21 in Klawock on Prince of Wales Island, 56 miles from Ketchikan.

Alaska State Troopers found Peratrovich, known locally as “Bingo,” dead in his Klawock mobile home.

Moses Scott Blanchard, 22, and Blaise Andrew Dilts, 21, are being charged with first-degree murder, second-degree murder, manslaughter, and first-degree burglary. Gonzalo Sanchez, 17, is being charged with second-degree murder, manslaughter, and first-degree burglary.

The men reportedly told investigators they had read a Facebook post stating Peratrovich had catcalled at a 13-year-old girl, and had chased her with an ax. The young men then beat Peratrovich to death with their hands, feet, and objects from around the house.

Another version of the incident was that Peratrovich talked to the girl and invited her to come inside for a bite to eat, while he was chopping firewood wood next to his home, but he continued to chop wood when she continued on her way.

The men told investigators they didn’t know if the allegations posted on Facebook were true. But comments on the Facebook post about the victim had urged violence against the elder.

“My uncle has been killed over gossip,” wrote Pamela Huteson on Facebook.

On March 21, after 1 am, the door to Peratrovich’s trailer was broken in. The three men reportedly entered and assaulted Peratrovich, while he was in bed.

Sanchez was arraigned Friday. Dilts and Blanchard are scheduled to be arraigned on Monday in Ketchikan Superior Court. 

All the defendants could face up to 99 years in custody as a maximum sentence. All are in custody and held on the same bail amounts- $500,000 100 percent cash performance and $100,000 appearance bail with 10 percent to post. 

Peratrovich family is well known in Southeast and around Alaska. Frank Peratrovich, who died in 1984, was the mayor of Klawock, and also served in the territorial legislature. Frank’s brother Roy married Elizabeth Peratrovich; the two would fight for civil rights for Alaska Natives and Elizabeth Peratrovich Day is now a nationally recognized day of honor on Feb. 16.

In 2009, the late Lincoln Peratrovich and the Shakan Kwann Tlingit band of rural residents sued the Secretary of Interior Kenneth Lee Salazar, Secretary of Agriculture Tom Villas, and chairman of the Federal Subsistence Board Tom Toward over a matter relating to subsistence fishing. His case was consolidated with the famous Katie John case, which became a pivotal case for Alaska Native subsistence rights.

Money mules: O’Keefe shows how ActBlue gets massive political donations from elderly, fixed-income Democrats

Journalist James O’Keefe, who parted ways with Project Veritas earlier this year and started O’Keefe Media Group, has rolled out his first project: Research shows that the behemoth Democrat fundraising platform known as ActBlue is using senior citizens who clearly don’t have the means to make large political donations, but are somehow mysteriously donating thousands of times a year and in many cases tens of thousands of dollars to Democrat candidates.

ActBlue acts like a fundraising clearinghouse for small-dollar donations. Every year it has to report to the Federal Election Commission where it got each and every dollar. The dollars go through ActBlue, and are funneled to various Democrat candidates or Democrat causes.

Nearly all Democrat candidates use the ActBlue fundraising mechanism, which is tied to the Democratic Party.

“We are a mission-based organization, which is why only Democrats and progressive organizations (not Republicans) can use our tools to fundraise,” the organization says on its website.

What O’Keefe was able to determine by combing the ActBlue donor lists is that some elderly, fixed-income donors are making thousands of donations a year. They tend to be people who can say they have made one or two donations, but no more.

When O’Keefe interviewed them, they had no idea that they were being used by what may be a program that uses their identities as mules for funneling dollars to candidates.

ActBlue has experienced significant growth in recent years. From 2004 to 2007, the platform raised $19 million. In the 2005-2006 campaign cycle, ActBlue raised $17 million for 1,500 Democratic candidates, with $15.5 million going to congressional campaigns. By August 2007, ActBlue had raised $25.5 million.

In the 2018 midterm elections, ActBlue raised $1.6 billion for Democratic candidates, with notable politicians such as Conor Lamb, Beto O’Rourke, and now-former Democrat Kyrsten Sinema benefiting from the platform.

In 2019, ActBlue raised approximately $1 billion, bringing in $420 million between January and mid-July 2019 from 3.3 million unique donors, dispersed to almost 9,000 Democratic campaigns and organizations.

One woman was listed by ActBlue as having given $18,000 to the campaign of Joe Biden for president. She was shocked by the revelation and said that she would certainly have made such a donation, had she had that kind of money, but she did not have that level of disposable income.

In 2020, ActBlue set multiple fundraising records, raising $19 million in the week following the death of George Floyd, and then breaking that record with $20 million raised on June 1.

Over half of the donations in the week following Floyd’s death went to non-political charitable causes, with one ActBlue page devoted to a bail fund for violent protesters that raised over $1.5 million from over 20,000 donors.

ActBlue also broke the single-day fundraising record when over $30 million was donated in the day following the death of Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg in 2020.

In 2022, ActBlue raised $20.6 million on the day the Supreme Court issued its opinion in Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization.

What is surprising is the number of individual donations from people who told O’Keefe that they had only made a couple of small donations.

Kyle Corrigan, a private investigator in Wisconsin, also discovered people in his state had been used as fundraising mules for ActBlue.

Peltola votes against lowering energy costs for Alaskans

Voting with hardline Democrats in Congress, Rep. Mary Peltola said the Lower Energy Costs Act just was not quite right for the country. She voted against H.R. 1, which passed anyway.

H.R. 1 addresses persistent high inflation that is caused in part by high energy costs and returns America to energy independence, as it was under the administration of Donald Trump. It does this by:

  • – Increasing domestic energy production 
  • – Reforming the permitting process for all industries 
  • – Reversing anti-energy policies advanced by the Biden administration 
  • – Streamlining energy infrastructure and exports 
  • – Boosting the production and processing of critical minerals 

The bill:

  • – Prohibits President Biden from banning hydraulic fracturing
  • – Repeals all restrictions on the import and export of natural gas, including LNG
  • – Prevents liberal states from blocking interstate infrastructure projects
  • – Repeals President Biden’s $6 billion natural gas tax that would increase energy bills for families
  • – Rolls back President Biden’s $27 billion EPA slush fund for Democrat special interests
  • – Disapproves of President Biden’s canceling of the Keystone XL pipeline
  • – Requires the Department of the Interior to resume lease sales on federal lands and waters
  • – Repeals harmful royalties and fee increases imposed on energy production that drive up prices for families
  • – Ensures parity in energy revenue sharing for states with onshore and offshore energy development
  • – Requires publication of the 2023-28 offshore oil and gas lease sales plan/sets deadlines for future 5-year plans

On Fox’s Faulkner Focus on Friday, Sen. Dan Sullivan praised H.R. 1 said he and his colleagues are working on a similar bill in the Senate, “to bring more American energy to Americans by American energy workers, the best workers in the world.”

“Republicans are prioritizing the American people over the Democrat’s radical climate agenda. On his first day in office, President Biden started the war on American energy. He has revoked the permit for the Keystone XL pipeline, imposed a moratorium on oil production on federal lands, directed agencies across the Federal government to impose punitive and burdensome regulations, and made us more reliant on China. Predictably, gas prices skyrocketed to the highest levels in American history. People are counting on us to improve their quality of life. H.R. 1 delivers on that promise and will ensure America continues to lead the world at reducing emissions. I commend the passing of this package, which will boost energy production, lift regulatory burdens for the construction of more energy infrastructure, cut China out of our critical materials supply chains, and lower costs across the board. H.R. 1 is how we build a better and more secure future for all Americans,” said House Committee on Energy and Commerce Chair Cathy McMorris Rodgers of Washington state.

But for Alaska’s Rep. Peltola, it was just another partisan bill. She said that the country needs to transition to a renewable-focused economy. She said H.R. 1 does not resolve permitting issues, of which she did not specify. She said that “we need a roadmap to the future that lowers costs for Americans, not another partisan bill that adds to the national debt.”

House Speaker Kevin McCarthy had a different take than Peltola: “In House Republicans’ Commitment to America, we promised the American people that we would work to reduce energy costs and make it easier and more affordable to build in the U.S. I’m proud to say that H.R. 1, the Lower Costs and Energy Act, will deliver on that promise by increasing energy production and instituting comprehensive permitting reform to speed the construction of critical infrastructure in our country. As our nation continues to recover from the highest inflation in generations, this bill will help stimulate our economy and bolster our national security while making us more competitive on the world stage against Russia and China. I am grateful for the leadership of Leader Scalise, Chairman Westerman, Chairwoman Rodgers, and Chairman Graves who all played a crucial role in getting H.R. 1 across the finish line. The need for permitting reform is something that Republicans and Democrats alike can get behind, and I encourage my colleagues in the Senate to do right by the American people and swiftly take up this bill.”

The Lower Energy Costs Act is a rebuke of President Biden’s war on affordable energy. If it reaches Biden’s desk, he will certainly veto it.

Four Democrats voted in favor of the bill, and one Republican voted against it. It passed 225-204. It will now be sent to the Senate, where it may be sidelined in a hostile committee, as the Senate is run by Democrats.