Wednesday, August 27, 2025
Home Blog Page 514

Paulette Simpson: It’s Groundhog Day on a vote for a new Juneau City Hall

By PAULETTE SIMPSON

On Sept. 13, 2022, the Juneau Empire published the following opinion piece about building a new city hall in Juneau. One year later, Juneau voters are again being asked to approve a bond proposition to build that same new city hall.  

By PAULETTE SIMPSON

For far too long, without first consulting taxpayers, Juneau’s elected officials have poured millions into premature plans for shiny new things.  

Improved quarters for city government may well be necessary.  I simply question the stipulation of building brand new instead of re-purposing surplus square footage, of which Juneau has plenty.

Re-purposing, however, would require an objective, comprehensive inventory of potential locations, an acknowledgement of Juneau’s demographic reality, and an admission that absent a growing population, our local tax base can’t support constructing and maintaining another expensive public building. Rather than conduct that painful “big picture” analysis, city officials instead create distractions and commission spiffy designs. 

It’s been happening for years. 

Unbeknownst to most current Assembly members, who either lived elsewhere or were teenagers at the time, in 2003, Mayor Bruce Botelho convinced the Assembly to spend over $500,000 on an international design competition for a new age 174,000 sq. ft. Capitol to replace the current 96,000 sq. ft. building. 

Juneau would issue municipal bonds to construct this $100 million Capitol on Telephone Hill, which the state would then lease for $7 million annually.  

Four Outside architectural firms were selected and paid to submit designs to the mayor’s Capitol Planning Commission that in 2005 chose the winning proposal from a Santa Monica, CA firm. The design featured an egg-shaped translucent dome with glass wings; renderings suggested the sci-fi dome would dominate and dwarf the downtown historic district. 

“I think the [jury members] have lost their freaking minds,” wrote Rick Tyner in a letter to the editor of the Juneau Empire. “I would rather move the capital to Anchorage than look at one of these eyesores the rest of my life.”

Roundly rejected by the state’s residents, the new capitol was not included in Gov. Frank Murkowski’s budget for fiscal year 2006. 

After the design competition collapsed, the existing capitol’s problems became a critical issue. The modest six-story brick office building, originally built in 1929-30, was out of date and seismically unsound; the masonry was decaying, and moisture had leaked into the walls.  

In 2006, a wise and responsible Legislature began setting aside funds to repair and upgrade the Capitol. Renovation commenced in 2013. By January 2017, the majority of the work had been completed at a cost of around $36 million. The state paid most of the costs and the Juneau Community Foundation contributed about $1 million. Juneau’s Art Deco treasure was saved.

Discussions surrounding the 2005 ($500,000) fiasco focused primarily on the avant-garde design.  Few questioned how the deteriorating old building would be backfilled, or if the structure would be boarded up or torn down once the new Capitol was built. 

The “Juneau 2006 Economic Overview” had warned that Juneau’s public-school enrollment had declined to its lowest level since 1992 and that Juneau had, “at least temporarily – stopped growing.”  And this, exactly, is what is happening now in 2022 as city mothers and fathers promote the construction of a new City Hall while our tax base continues to shrink.

Arguing for its construction, Rich Moniak wrote, “A new City Hall is an investment in democracy” (Juneau Empire, Sept. 2, 2022).  

Comparable hyperbolic claims were made in 2005 when the egg-dome architects cooed that, “The new Capitol Campus encourages democracy,” going so far as to label their creation a “physical manifestation of democracy.” 

The 2005 concept for a new Capitol Campus in Juneau.

The Assembly’s cheerleader in chief for the current project, Wade Bryson, spouts similar blarney, suggesting a new City Hall is the “single largest loudest action that we can take against capital creep.” 

Earth to Wade: Affordable housing, a road, and an attitude of accommodation and hospitality are probably a better bet.

Bryson also declares that “Every aspect of Juneau life will improve by us doing city hall correctly.”

So, if we gift government grand new quarters, will Juneau magically become more affordable, taxes go down, and the dump no longer stink?

In 2005, Gov. Frank Murkowski spared Juneau a 96,000 sq. ft. vacancy at the corner of 4th and Main. 

Now, 18 years later, City leaders continue to delight in new designs while school enrollments drop. Juneau voters get the final say on a new city hall when we vote on Proposition No. 1 in our Vote-by-Mail election occurring now through October 3.  

Paulette Simpson is a resident of Douglas.

David Boyle: Leftists attempt to take over Fairbanks School Board

By DAVID BOYLE

The Oct. 3 Fairbanks school board election is critical for keeping parents in charge of their children. 

If the leftists win, Fairbanks will be getting a board that welcomes Critical Race Theory, DEI, and the belief that they know better than parents or guardians.  

The three leftist candidates are Bobby Burgess, Meredith Maple, and Tim Doran.

The moderate/conservative candidates are April Smith, Maggie Matheson, and Michael Humphrey.

And once again, money is flowing into the state from Outside interests to affect the election results. The leftist candidates have outraised the more moderate and conservative candidates by $40,819 to $26,547.

Much of the funding for the left-leaning candidates has come from the “Putting Alaskans First Committee,” which is funded mostly by government union PACs, including the NEA-PACE teachers union.  The contact person and treasurer is Joelle Hall of the Alaska AFL-CIO labor union.

Here is its most recent APOC report:

“Putting Alaskans First Committee” sounds like a good organization, right? But most of the funding for the “Putting Alaskans First Committee” comes from Outside Alaska organizations. Here is a quote from its website where it even says that “A majority of contributions … came from outside the state of Alaska”: 

Paid for by the Putting Alaskans First Committee, 3333 Denali St. Ste. 125 Anchorage, AK 99503. I, Kim Hays, Chair approved this message. Top three contributors are UNITE AMERICA PAC of Denver, CO, LIUNA Political Fund of Washington, DC, and NEA Advocacy Fund of Washington, DC. This NOTICE TO VOTERS is required by Alaska law. I certify that this advertisement is not authorized, paid for, or approved by the candidate. A majority of contributions to Putting Alaskans First Committee came from outside the State of Alaska.”

Why do Outside organizations from Denver, Colo. and Washington, D.C. have such an interest in the Fairbanks school board election?  

Why are the campaigns of Burgess, Meredith, and Duran funded by these Outside interests?  

It appears as if the leftist candidates are running a pretender campaign, hiding the values they really represent. Their campaign pages are plain vanilla and say very little about their values and beliefs.

Do you want your children to be masked in class? Candidate Burgess would probably push to mask your children. If you had seen him at the latest school board meeting, that would have to be your conclusion:

April Smith is Burgess’ opponent and has opposed the masking of students and the closure of schools during the pandemic.  All three leftist candidates running now criticize her for that stance. Smith has also opposed Critical Race Theory, Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion policies in the school district. Most of the opposition to April Smith has come from the transgender/gender identity community, which favors hiding a student’s gender transitioning from parents.

The conservative candidates are being attacked for their “focus on culture wars” and not academics, when in fact, the Left has brought the culture wars to the classroom in its attempts to indoctrinate our children. 

And their attempts to replace parents with radical leftist ideas have awakened mama bears.

The Fairbanks Education Association, which is the teachers’ union associated with the NEA, has endorsed Burgess, Doran, and Maple. That’s because the union believes the focus of schools should be on equity and inclusion and most of all, increased funding. The ABCs seem to be buried somewhere in their agenda.  

Even the radical environmental organization The Alaska Center (For the Environment) has endorsed the three leftist school board candidates.

Fairbanks voters, do you want these three teacher-union endorsed candidates negotiating union contracts and raising your taxes?

Burgess, who is running against incumbent April Smith, believes the only way to improve K-12 education is more funding. He believes the Alaska Reads Act is okay but there is not enough money to implement it. He quotes the usual “flat funding” complaint that the teacher’s union has pushed for the past few years, without acknowledging that extra funding is awarded to schools year after year, outside of the base student allocation.

Meredith Maple is running against Maggie Matheson.  She is married to Kell Gitter who was a female in 2013.  Here is a quote from article from the Fairbanks Daily News-Miner, May 1, 2013: “Kelly Gitter’s shoelaces were frozen, and her socks were wet after she played for the first time in the Springfest Rugby Tournament on Saturday afternoon at the University of Alaska Fairbanks”. Having transitioned to a male, Gitter and her/his wife Maple are raising their adopted child.  

Meredith Maple states on her web site that “Pre-K programming not only prepares students for Kindergarten, but also improves their lives permanently. “  Apparently, Maple believes it is the responsibility of teachers to “program” children in their values, not parent’s values. 

Michael Humphrey is a conservative candidate running against Tim Doran. Tim Doran is currently on the board and is a retired teacher/principal.  Humphrey states on his website that, “Children have the right to be secure in their bathrooms and private spaces, in their sports, and in the values imparted to them by their parents without facing new values proposition from positions of authority at school.”

Humphrey also believes in the teaching of core subjects and a rigorous focus on academics.

So, it’s up to Fairbanks voters: Do you want boys who identify as girls to use girls’ bathrooms?

Fairbanks, do you believe a student’s pronoun usage and transgenderism should be hidden from parents?

Do you believe diversity, equity and inclusion are more important than teaching a child how to read?

You have a clear choice.

Here are the moderate/conservative candidates:  Michael Humphrey, April Smith, and Maggie Matheson.

Here are the leftist candidates: Bobby Burgess, Meredith Maple, and Tim Doran.

Remember, elections do have consequences. 

Electing these leftists will dramatically change the education of your children.  

You need to get out and vote.  

Vote for your children and grandchildren. They are depending on you!

David Boyle is the education writer for Must Read Alaska.

Alaska, American Airlines flight attendants could strike over holidays

58

Traveling this holiday season? Plan for chaos, just in case flight attendants decide to strike.

After a vote by participating flight attendants went heavily toward a strike two weeks ago, over 26,000 flight attendants are set to sit out their shifts if the contract negotiations with Alaska Airlines and American Airlines are not resolved by November.

A strike might not be not on every flight, but on random flights, which would cause airline management to be unable to adapt. It’s a type of asymmetrical labor warfare that would give flight attendance the upper hand.

Some 99.47% of participating flight attendants voted to authorize a strike, and more than 93% of eligible flight attendants participated in the vote.

The Association of Flight Attendants, the AFL-CIO union representing the flight attendants, are asking to be paid during boarding and deplaning, and a 40% overall increase in pay and benefits. They say that current wages for flight attendants make them qualify for federal food stamp assistance during their first year of work for Alaska Airlines.

Currently, flight attendants are not on the clock until the boarding door is closed, the brakes are released, and the plane is pushed back. If there is a long delay in boarding, due to mechanical issues or runway congestion, flight attendants can be on board but not paid for many minutes or hours.

Negotiations, scheduled through November, could lead to a holiday strike during the busiest travel season of the year. The union cannot call the strike until at least the end of September, which marks the end of the 30-day cooling off period that is a labor rule of the National Mediation Board.

Picketing by Alaska Airlines attendants took place in August in major airports of the west coast, including Anchorage, with some flight attendants holding signs that said, “PAY US OR CHAOS.”

Air Force will miss recruitment goal, first time since Bill Clinton presidency

21

The Air Force will miss its annual enlisted recruiting goal across all three components for the first time since 1999, according to the head of the recruiting division.

The active duty Air Force reached 90% of its goal of 26,877 enlisted recruits, about 2,700 short of what it needs, according to Air Force Times. The Air Force Reserve and Air National Guard fared are also short, with 30% shortfalls in each component. The Reserve had set a goal of recruiting 9,300 and the Guard aimed at enlisting 11,745 airmen.

It’s not a complete surprise to the top brass. In March, Air Force Secretary Scott Kendall told a group that the Air Force would miss the goal by 10%, and six months later he appears to be spot on.

“We are swimming upstream against a reduced propensity to serve nationally across the board and a limited percentage of qualified candidates,” Kendall said in March.

Kendall continued to soften the news throughout the year. In June, he said the Air Force was working on ways of managing the situation.

“We have things that we can do to manage our way through this, so we’re not in any kind of crisis,” Kendall said at the Center for New American Security on June 22, according to Air & Space Forces Magazine

According to some, young people have more economic opportunities right now, with a job market begging for anyone willing to work. Eligible recruits are in shorter supply than in past generations, as many young people are obese, have been on psychotropic or therapeutic drugs, use illegal drugs, or have a history of breaking the law.

Leftists say the military is racist and does not promote females.

Those on the right say the military has become too focused on identity politics, and does not value the fighting and patriotic traits of warriors.

Trust in institutions in general is also at a low point in America. Some potential warriors do not trust the government and won’t join a military that has become politicized with woke politics and suspect leaders.

Rep. Jordan subpoenas reluctant FBI agent to Judiciary to testify about government censorship of Hunter Biden laptop story

19

House Judiciary Committee Chairman Jim Jordan has subpoenaed FBI Agent Elvis Chan after he and the FBI tried to outmaneuver the committee as he was scheduled to testify.

On Friday, the Ohio Republican released the subpoena against Chan, in which he says that the executive branch colluded with social media companies to censor a story about Joe Biden’s son’s laptop, which Hunter Biden had dropped off at a Delaware computer repair shop in 2019 and never retrieved.

The Department of Justice, in a last minute attempt to take control of the hearing, said that agent Chan would only testify if he could have a second lawyer with him.

The committee is investigating how the Hunter Biden laptop news was downplayed and even censored by social media companies. Chairman Jim Jordan, in his investigations, believes that Chan lied about the computer.

Get caught up on the Hunter Biden laptop story and how social media giants suppressed it before the election at this link:

“The Committee on the Judiciary is conducting oversight of how and to what extent the Executive Branch has coerced and colluded with companies and other intermediaries to censor speech,” Jordan wrote. “As the primary liaison between the Federal Bureau of Investigation’s (FBI) Foreign Influence Task Force (FITF) and social media companies, you are uniquely positioned to aid the Committee’s oversight.”

Jordan noted that a trove of documents now publicly available “reflect the weaponization of the federal government’s power to censor speech online directly and by proxy. It is necessary for Congress to gauge the extent to which FBI agents coerced, pressured, worked with, or relied upon social media and other tech companies to censor speech. The scope of the Committee’s investigation includes understanding the extent and nature of the FBI’s involvement in this censorship. For example, through its investigation, the Committee has uncovered evidence that appears to contradict several statements in your deposition in Missouri v. Biden, particularly as they relate to your communications with social media platforms.”

Of interest to the committee is how the FBI labeled “disinformation” reporting by the New York Post, which aggressively covered the Hunter Biden laptop story in 2020 and was “deplatformed” by Twitter, which means it lost access to its account at the social media company on Oct. 14, just before the 2020 presidential general election.

“The Committee was ready and willing to proceed with your transcribed interview under the Committee’s established protocols. After the Committee repeatedly requested that you voluntarily appear for a transcribed interview, the FBI agreed to schedule your interview for September 15, 2023, with full knowledge of the Committee’s longstanding protocol for conducting transcribed interviews. Then, only three days before your scheduled interview, you and the FBI requested special treatment to deviate from this protocol, which the Committee repeatedly and clearly denied. Just one day before your scheduled transcribed interview, you threatened to withdraw your appearance due to this disagreement and today you failed to appear for your interview,” Jordan wrote in his explanation of the subpoena.

“It is necessary for Congress to gauge the extent to which FBI agents coerced, pressured, worked with, or relied upon social media and other tech companies to censor speech. The scope of the Committee’s investigation includes understanding the extent and nature of the FBI’s involvement in this censorship,” he wrote.

The FBI says the Department did not block Chan from testifying.

“Agent Chan chose to be represented by both agency and personal counsel. He went to the Capitol this morning to testify and, instead of asking him questions, Committee staff turned him away and threatened to throw agency counsel out of the room,” the FBI reported to the Daily Mail.

By bringing in an additional counsel to the hearing, Chan and the FBI likely knew that they would trigger a conflict with the committee as they attempted to set their own rules of engagement for the congressional committee hearing.

Earlier this year, Rep. Matt Gaetz has entered the entire contents of the Hunter Biden laptop into the Congressional Record, making it a public document. The documents show the FBI took possession of the laptop in December of 2019. Read about that here:

Texas Senate acquits state attorney general on all impeachment charges

By BETHANY BLANKLEY | THE CENTER SQUARE

The Texas Senate acquitted Attorney General Ken Paxton Saturday of all charges levied against him by the House in an impeachment trial that lasted 10 days.

A conviction on any article would have resulted in Paxton being removed from office and being barred from serving in any public office in Texas again. 

The senators voted on 16 out of 20 article filed; four were held in abeyance. A vote of 21 was needed to sustain each article of impeachment and convict Paxton of the charge. No article received more than 14 votes to convict. Senators also voted to dismiss the remaining four articles held in abeyance.

Sixteen Republican senators who voted to acquit Paxton on all articles were Sens. Paul Bettencourt, Brian Birdwell, Donna Campbell, Brandon Creighton, Pete Flores, Joan Huffman, Bryan Hughes, Bob Hall, Phil King, Lois Kolkhorst, Mays Middleton, Tan Parker, Charles Perry, Charles Schwertner, Kevin Sparks and Drew Springer.

Two Republicans who consistently voted with Democrats to convict Paxton were Sens. Kelly Hancock of Richland Hills and Robert Nichols of Jacksonville.

Paxton was not in attendance. 

Article 1 failed by a vote of 16-14, resulting in an acquittal. Hancock and Nichols voted with all Democrats to convict. 

Article 2 failed by a vote of 16-14, resulting in acquittal. Hancock and Nichols voted with all Democrats to convict.

Article 3 failed by a vote of 16-14, resulting in acquittal. Hancock and Nichols voted with all Democrats to convict.

Article 4 failed by a vote of 28-2, with all Republicans and 11 Democrats voting to acquit. 

Article 5 failed by a vote of 17-13, resulting in acquittal, with Hancock voting with Democrats. 

Article 6 failed by a vote of 16-14, resulting in acquittal, with Hancock and Nichols voting with Democrats. 

Article 7 failed by a vote of 16-14, resulting in acquittal, with Hancock and Nichols voting with Democrats to convict. 

Article 8 failed by a vote of 22-8, resulting in acquittal, with Nichols joining Democrats to convict. Seven Democrats joined nearly all Republicans to acquit. 

Article 9 failed by a vote of 18-12, with all Republicans voting to acquit. 

Article 10 – a key charge that Paxton committed bribery, failed by a vote of 16-14. Republican Sens. Hancock and Nichols voting with Democrats to convict. 

Article 15 failed by a vote of 16-14, resulting in acquittal, with Hancock and Nichols voting with Democrats to convict.

Article 16 failed, by a vote of 16-14, resulting in acquittal, with Hancock and Nichols voting with Democrats to convict.

Article 17 failed by a vote of 16-14, resulting in acquittal, with Hancock and Nichols voting with Democrats to convict.

Article 18 failed by a vote of 16-14, resulting in acquittal, with Hancock and Nichols voting with Democrats to convict.

Article 19 failed by a vote of 16-14, resulting in acquittal, with Hancock and Nichols voting with Democrats to convict.

Article 20 failed by a vote of 16-14, resulting in acquittal, with Hancock and Nichols voting with Democrats to convict.

Assembly to vote on hired-gun law firm for Demboski vs. mayor lawsuit, for $230,000

46

The Anchorage Assembly will take up a recommendation on Monday on a monetary award to a legal firm to fight a lawsuit filed by former City Manager Amy Demboski against Mayor Dave Bronson and his administration for wrongful termination.

The award is being recommended to be made in the amount of $250,000 to Sedor, Wendlandt, Evans and Filipi. The meeting on the 18th is a special meeting of the Assembly and only this item is listed on the agenda, so far.

Demboski sued earlier, saying her firing by the mayor was an act of gender discrimination, defamation, and retaliation for her raising concerns about some of the actions of the Bronson Administration.

Demboski has accused the mayor of unethical and illegal actions and says she is a whistleblower. In a letter from her attorney Scott Kendall, she is claiming repetitional and financial damage.

Earlier this year, the Assembly rejected a proposed $550,000 settlement, which would have avoided court proceedings. Demboski earned over $219,000 a year as municipal manager.

“This letter is an attempt to educate you regarding the unfortunate, and potentially grave, repercussions of your actions and to provide an opportunity to resolve this matter short of extensive discovery and costly litigation,” the Jan. 11 letter written by her lawyer said.

But the attempt to resolve it without going to court was rejected by the hostile Assembly, which plans to use the taxpayer funded litigation as a form of campaign drama against Bronson as he runs for reelection, keeping him in the public eye in an unfavorable light. The majority of the Assembly is in the “anyone but Bronson” camp for the election that begins in March and ends in April or later, depending on whether there is a runoff.

School Board says Anchorage will have $95 million shortfall next year

57

A massive school funding shortfall — perhaps the biggest ever for Anchorage — was the topic of a joint meeting held between the Anchorage Assembly and the School Board this week. The district’s elected leaders said schools will be short by $95 million in the next budget year.

The general fund school budget for fiscal year 2025 would be about $649 million to maintain some version of the status quo. But the total budget, including grants and federal passthroughs, is over $900 million. Projections are that the district will have about $554 million to work with.

The shortfall is reminiscent of 2021, when the district faced a $68 million funding gap in its $549.5 million general fund budget.

It’s reminiscent of 2020, when it announced it had $28 million budget shortfall for the 2021-22 school year.

It’s reminiscent of 2015, when the district had a $566 million operating budget and came up $23 million short of the funds the district reportedly needed.

In other words, the budget shortfall is an annual topic in Anchorage schools, where funding is never enough to meet the school board’s needs.

But while costs go up, students performance has gone down. And also going down is enrollment. The Anchorage School District has lost students steadily for decades. In 2002, approximately 50,000 were enrolled. This year the student count — still unofficial until October — is about 42,000, the lowest it has been since 1991. The school district has lost more than 14% in the past three decades.

The school board has so far taken no action to close any schools to consolidate, as the demographics change, however. In fact, it has about $30 million set aside in a pot to pay for repairs to Inlet View Elementary — money that could be used to plug the funding gap. There is also a huge stash of CARES Act money that has to be spent by Sept. 30, 2024, which could be used to plug the gap.

The school district also has numerous unfilled and arguably needed positions that it keeps on the books, and that artificially inflates the budget.

School Board President Margo Bellamy said inflation and inadequate state funding support are the primary reasons the district is in tough financial straits. She wants the base student allocation (BSA) formula increased.

Currently, the state provides a base amount of $5,900 per student, and the school board president says she needs another $1,200 per student. She did not acknowledge that in addition to the BSA funding, the state has regularly provided additional funding outside the formula except in 2016 and 2017. The base student allocation formula is an annual tug of war between union-run schools and the people who fund them.

Per-pupil spending in Alaska exceeds $19,000, with some estimates as high as $21,000. The U.S. average is $14,347, according to the U.S. Census.

State, local, and federal funding for K-12 education in Alaska is $2.9 billion for 115,000 of students in average daily attendance. Of course, 21,000 of those students are in correspondence programs, and those students get only state funding, and no local or federal dollars. The total per student actually attending brick-and-mortar schools in Alaska is about $28,000 per student.

Inflation has affected all government budgets, as well as the household budgets of taxpayers. Since 1990, the U.S. dollar had an average inflation rate of 2.57% per year between, for a cumulative price increase of 125.42%. Today’s prices are 2.25 times as high as average prices since 1991, according to the Bureau of Labor Statistics consumer price index.

Next door in the Matanuska-Susitna Borough School District, there are 19,319 students, closing in on half the number attending in Anchorage. Mat-Su has 47 school locations, compared to the 97 school locations in Anchorage. While its budget of $266 million is adequate to meet expenses this year, it anticipates a shortfall of $10.8 million in 2025, due to rising costs, such as health insurance going up 8% per year, salaries increasing, and utilities costing more.

Although Mat-Su schools are absorbing students whose parents are fleeing the Anchorage School District, the district has no current budget shortfall, and its upcoming expected shortfall is still a fraction of the Anchorage School District’s budget gap.

New Mexico’s governor backs down on gun ban, limits it to playgrounds and parks

By DAVID MASTIO | THE CENTER SQUARE

At a Friday press conference, New Mexico Gov. Michelle Lujan Grisham announced that she is amending her controversial gun ban order to allow open and concealed carry, except in parks and playgrounds “where we know we have high risk of kids and families,” she said.

The move comes a day after a federal judge temporarily blocked the order and fellow Democratic politicians denounced her plan as unconstitutional. Local law enforcement had refused to enforce the order and the state’s attorney general had refused to defend it in court.

Lujan Grisham, citing recent shootings, had declared a public health emergency centered on gun violence. The executive order signed September 8, included an “action plan” that banned carrying a loaded weapon off of private property in Bernalillo County, which includes Albuquerque. The governor’s office threatened fines of up to $5,000 for violations.

The governor made the changes to the order after “listening to the debate in court,” according to ABC

“I want to point out that the conversation in that court was pretty clear that we are not wrong about this emergency, or about the issues related to violence, gun violence and public safety generally,” Grisham said.