Tuesday, April 29, 2025
Home Blog Page 5

Alexander Dolitsky: Cold War missed opportunities and misguided policies led US and Russia to the brink

By ALEXANDER DOLITSKY

In early Spring of 1990, Mikhail Gorbachev, then-president of the Soviet Socialist Republic, was awarded an honorary doctorate in humanities from the University of Alaska Southeast. Chancellor of UAS Marshall Lind invited Yuri Dubinin, then the Soviet ambassador to the US to accept this award on Gorbachev’s behalf. 

Dubinin arrived at Juneau with an entourage of six Soviet officials. Back then, I was teaching Russian studies and archaeology at UAS and was assigned to accompany the Soviet delegation. In fact, Dubinin was the first Soviet ambassador to visit Alaska in the post-World War II era.

Dubinin became ambassador to the US in 1986 after serving a short stint as the Soviet envoy to the United Nations and he was the Soviet Union’s ambassador to the United States during much of the turbulent 1980s’ perestroika period. In his Washington embassy post, Dubinin described himself as a “popularizer of perestroika” — the radical reform efforts of the Soviet leader Gorbachev. Dubinin also oversaw opening the Russian embassy to news conferences under Gorbachev’s initiatives.

In Alaska, the mid-1980s through 1990s was an enthusiastic period of the Soviet/Russia–Alaska relationships in almost all cultural, educational, and governmental spheres. Yes, I was a busy person, translating almost daily for all involved in the Russia-Alaska affairs; the enrollment in my Russian language classes at UAS was over the limit, with a long waiting list. Indeed, it was a promising hope to end Cold War tensions and begin a new era of mutually productive and friendly relationship between two great nations.

Nevertheless, whether under Soviet/Russian leadership of Khrushchev, Brezhnev, Chernenko, Andropov, Gorbachev, Yeltsin, or Putin, the US never stopped its Cold War policies of undermining USSR/Russia. In the late 1970s, President Jimmy Carter provided military and logistical support to the Afghan Mujahideen, the precursor to the Taliban, therefore, provoking Soviet invasion of Afghanistan in 1979.

In fact, every successive US president continued covert and overt interference in countries on Russia’s southern borders, including former Soviet Central Asian republics of Kazakhstan, Uzbekistan, Kyrgyzstan, Turkmenistan and Tajikistan.

The ideological architect of the strategy to contain the Soviet Union during Carter presidency was Zbigniew Brzezinski, national security advisor and antagonist of the Soviet regime. Indeed, Ukraine played a pivotal role in the so-called Brzezinski Doctrine, which identifies it as the key to preventing Russian–European economic and political integration. Still today, the US foreign establishment is rife with Brzezinski proteges and anti-Russian Cold War ideology.

With Ukraine, because of Brzezinski’s anti-Russian ideology, the West made a major strategic bet that eventually failed. The crippling sanctions against Russia since 2014 should have cratered the Russian economy, resulting in a popular uprising and leading to the replacement of Vladimir Putin with a pro-Western leader.

As a result of this wishful dream and false expectation of this hostile strategy, another pro-Western globalist in the Kremlin would have been a boon for Wall Street, as Russia is the richest country in the world in terms of natural resources. With the growing importance and demands for natural resources, Russia represents a rich investment opportunity for the unforeseen future. In fact, the Western sanctions against Russia completely and undeniably failed—in 2024, European Union’s GDP grew 1.7 percent, while Russia’s GDP grew 4.2 percent.

Soon after the dissolution of the Soviet Union, as early as 1993, President Bill Clinton started pushing for NATO expansion in Europe, including Ukraine, to which many strategically thinking American sociologists and historians strongly objected; and this is how the slippery road to the current crisis might escalate into potential nuclear WWIII.

After gaining its independence in 1991, Ukraine could expect a bright future. At that time, Ukraine (with exception of Russia) was the largest country (territory) in Europe, with a population of 52 million citizens, and sixth largest GDP in Europe. Having vital industrial and agricultural sectors, a favorable climate, and fertile land, the country needed effective anti-corruption reforms, a certain level of autonomy for the regions with large Russian ethnic populations, and, most importantly, neutral status with no membership in any military blocs to become one of the most prosperous European states within its 1991 borders.

Instead, billions from the US, Canada, other Western countries, and George Soros were poured into Ukraine; not to boost its economy but to reformat public opinion, which overwhelmingly favored neutral status and against joining NATO. This money and political influence from the West helped to instigate the regime change of “Orange” revolution in 2004 and then “Maidan” in 2014, which was directly coordinated by then-Vice President Joe Biden with Victoria Nuland from the White House in Ukrainian capital Kyiv.

The new Ukrainian government that Washington and West selected immediately declared its intention to join NATO. In fact, if not for this coup in Ukraine in 2014, there would be no annexation of the Crimean Peninsula by Russia in 2014, today’s war in East Ukraine, and no risk of potential nuclear World War III.

In short, the US and Western policies of using Ukrainians as cannon fodder to inflict a strategic defeat on Russia denigrates and contradicts the fundamental spirit and soul of America itself. The country that claims its adherence to Western, or in broader terms Judeo-Christian, values provoked and keeps funding to prolong a war between two Christian nations that have lived together for over three centuries and are bound together by close historical, religious, economic, cultural, and family ties.

Currently, no one can predict how the Russian-Ukrainian/West war will end, but as the drums of World War III keep banging, those who are not among decision-makers or on the battlefields should at least try to clear the smog of this war.

Alexander Dolitsky was born and raised in Kiev in the former Soviet Union. He received an M.A. in history from Kiev Pedagogical Institute, Ukraine in 1976; an M.A. in anthropology and archaeology from Brown University in 1983; and enrolled in the Ph.D. program in anthropology at Bryn Mawr College from 1983 to 1985, where he was also lecturer in the Russian Center. In the USSR, he was a social studies teacher for three years and an archaeologist for five years for the Ukrainian Academy of Sciences. In 1978, he settled in the United States. Dolitsky visited Alaska for the first time in 1981, while conducting field research for graduate school at Brown. He then settled first in Sitka in 1985 and then in Juneau in 1986. From 1985 to 1987, he was U.S. Forest Service archaeologist and social scientist. He was an Adjunct Assistant Professor of Russian Studies at the University of Alaska Southeast from 1985 to 1999; Social Studies Instructor at the Alyeska Central School, Alaska Department of Education and Yukon-Koyukuk School District from 1988 to 2006; and Director of the Alaska-Siberia Research Center from 1990 to 2022. From 2006 to 2010, Alexander Dolitsky served as a Delegate of the Russian Federation in the United States for the Russian Compatriots program. He has done 30 field studies in various areas of the former Soviet Union (including Siberia), Central Asia, South America, Eastern Europe and the United States (including Alaska). Dolitsky was a lecturer on the World Discoverer, Spirit of Oceanus, and Clipper Odyssey vessels in the Arctic and Sub-Arctic regions. He was a Project Manager for the WWII Alaska-Siberia Lend Lease Memorial, which was erected in Fairbanks in 2006. Dolitsky has published extensively in the fields of anthropology, history, archaeology and ethnography. His more recent publications include Fairy Tales and Myths of the Bering Strait Chukchi, Ancient Tales of Kamchatka, Tales and Legends of the Yupik Eskimos of Siberia, Old Russia in Modern America: Living Traditions of the Russian Old Believers in Alaska, Allies in Wartime: The Alaska-Siberia Airway During World War II, Spirit of the Siberian Tiger: Folktales of the Russian Far East, Living Wisdom of the Russian Far East: Tales and Legends from Chukotka and Alaska, and Pipeline to Russia: The Alaska-Siberia Air Route in World War II.

Alexander Dolitsky: What America can learn from the decline and fall of world empires

Alexander Dolitsky: Proof positive that life experience is an author’s greatest asset

Glenfarne won’t need the $50 million guarantee from state agency for gasline; will do it with private funds

Glenfarne, the company that has an agreement with the Alaska Gasline Development Corporation to move a gasline forward for Alaska, will not be needing the $50 million guarantee that the Alaska Industrial Development and Export Authority had offered.

That news was relayed in a House committee today by AGDC President Frank Richards.

Glenfarne, the new majority owner and lead developer of the Alaska LNG project, will proceed without the previously approved $50 million financial backstop, a development that takes that off the table as criticism of the project. Some critics had said that Glenfarne didn’t have enough skin in the game, if that guarantee was in place.

Glenfarne had inherited that $50 million backstop guarantee from an agreement with an earlier pipeline builder, a builder that was only interested in doing the narrower building portion of the project, which had a lot more financial risk associate with it.

Richards told the House Resources Committee that Glenfarne is going to seek private financing for the entire project and won’t need to be reimbursed for the front-end engineering and design portion if the project does not reach a final investment decision.

The Alaska LNG project has received all major federal permits, and may eventually deliver up to 3.3 billion cubic feet of gas per day, some for Alaska and some for export. With Glenfarne’s leadership and financial commitment, the project is moving quickly toward that prized “final investment decision.” That decision is expected later this year.

Bob Bird: How to vote for a pope

By BOB BIRD

Time now to discuss “papabili.” Or, Catholic cardinals who might be the next pope.

Pronounced, pa-PA-bee-lee. Please do not offend my sensitive Italian ears by mispronouncing this, like so many do in regards to a favorite pizza cheese. (It is NOT “provolone” with a Long O and Silent E, but pro-vo-LO-nay.)

Alexander Dolitsky, a superb conservative columnist whose essays have regularly appeared here, has revealed his Russian biography to the readers. I will now do so briefly here.

Despite my last name, I am very Italian. My mother Hedda was a spy and scout for the Italian underground, known as partisans. My Uncle Mario, as a teen, blew up a truck of SS troops with a grenade, on its way to slaughter a village that was hiding partisans. 

My dad, Robert was an American GI, an Intel & Recon officer. He met Hedda while he was on patrol, in the final six weeks of the war. I have his pocket diary with many details. He became the commander of the CID/Mediterranean Theater and remained in Italy for two years after the war, prosecuting Americans soldiers who were guilty of crimes. 

They were married in Pisa. My Mom was quadri-lingual. On my first trip to Italy, I sailed on the ill-fated Andrea Doria in 1955, and remember it well. A year later, the ship was T-boned in fog, and sank. I myself speak Italian quite well. I visited many Catholic shrines in Italy with my wife in 2023. We saw the Shroud of Turin in 2010.

The media will come out with various and contradictory assessments about who the next pope might be. All of us will have to chew and digest them, and think for ourselves. But what difference should it make? This is not something the world gets to vote on, right?

Catholics and non-Catholics might all have similar reactions. “Nothing I can do about it, so whatever happens, happens.” Or perhaps, “Who could care, anyway?” This might be fitting responses for atheists and agnostics, but not for Protestants, Evangelicals, Catholics, Jews and Moslems, all of whom pray to the God of Abraham, our “Father in Faith.”

They might even detest or fear the Catholic Church, misunderstand it or ignore it, but none can deny its importance. It is the world’s largest religion. And despite its apparent loss of influence, that influence is still there, and admitted to be so, even by its open enemies, who have long wanted to destroy it.

And while millions have left it, there is an awareness, backed by solid data, that a new seed is sprouting once again. The Church is ever-ancient, and ever-young. This renewal is visible, and depending on your perspective, it is either a new hope or a new threat.

Only a fool thinks that a man who will claim to be “The Vicar of Christ on Earth” does not possess influence. He does. He will. And another confused and contradictory pope will serve the entire world ill.

My stomach has turned in reading the characterizations in the mainstream media regarding the legacy of Pope Francis.

He was anything but humble. He was crude, impulsive and contradictory. Like so many Catholics, he was poorly instructed in Church dogma, and the long-established limits on his own power. He was a tool of globalists. He gave man-made climate change, anti-Americanism, leftist sympathies and Covid-vaxing his priorities, all of which are propped up by the diminishing influence of the globalists, who controlled him.

His confusion was ignored and his better comments emphasized, by priests and bishops who actually knew better, but they played along, mostly out of fear. He banished the truly humble and tradition-minded priests and bishops to the Church attic, suppressed religious orders and institutions who were founded on the same plane, and appointed those who shared his false compassion that would pander to the sins of adultery and homosexuality.

The smart money is that his intentional packing of the College of Cardinals will ensure that this sort of papacy will continue. But smart money is often wrong.

So, how does the humblest worshipper of the God of Abraham, Catholic or not, vote for pope? Well, all of them understand that you can pray. And prayer is effective. Just how it works is a mystery, but there is an old saying that says, “Prayer is man’s strength, and God’s weakness.”

To keep this column short, here is a list of papabili. The first list would be Cardinals who would continue the Francine Legacy of confusion and destruction. 

  • Pietro Parolin, Vatican Secretary of State.
  • Mario Grech, from Malta.
  • Sergio Rocha, from Brazil. An Odds-on favorite.
  • Luis Tagle, Philippines. Another favorite of the odds-makers.
  • Carlos Retes, from Mexico.

Next is a list of those who would make the cleansing and corrections needed to reform the Church and its tarnished reputation. They belong to the Pope John Paul II and Benedict XVI school of adherence to timeless truths. None of them are favorites in the sense of the odds, but odds are often wrong.

  • Pierbattista Pizzabella, Patriarch of Jerusalem.
  • Peter Erdo, Hungary.
  • Freddin Besungo, Congo.
  • Robert Sarah, Guineau.
  • Gerhard Muller, Germany.

The list is incomplete in both categories, and of the 266 popes, the dark horse has often been selected.

So, whether you are Catholic or not, if you want a good pope, pray for it. There is no Dominion voting machine, or paper ballots. My guess is that the Almighty will be even more impressed with prayer emanating from non-Catholics than from Catholics.

And do something that only cheaters do, and in this case, is perfectly legit:

Vote early, and vote often.

Bob Bird is former chair of the Alaskan Independence Party and the host of a talk show on KSRM radio, Kenai.

Passing: Service this week for William ‘Bill’ Sharrow, longtime state director for Congressman Don Young

William “Bill” Sharrow, a decorated brigadier general in the Alaska National Guard and the longtime state director for the late Congressman Don Young, died April 11, 2025, with Margaret, his beloved wife of 69 years, by his side. He was 92.

Born Aug. 19, 1932, in the iron mining hamlet of Witherbee, NY, Bill’s life was defined by duty, service, and deep commitment to both his country and community.

After working as a hard-rock driller in an iron mine following high school, he was drafted into the Army during the Korean War and stationed in Anchorage in 1952 with the 867th AAA Battalion. Alaska would capture his heart, and shape his future.

While in Alaska, a sergeant enlisted Bill and three fellow soldiers to help build a log cabin near Palmer. It was there that he met Margaret, who was a nurse at the Palmer Hospital. The connection would define the rest of his life. After his discharge in 1954, he returned briefly to New York and joined an Army Reserve unit, but soon realized Alaska, and Margaret, were where he truly belonged.

He returned to Alaska, joined the Alaska Army National Guard, and was commissioned as an officer in 1956. Over the next two decades, Bill rose through the ranks, serving in an array of vital roles including radio repairman, supply officer, personnel officer, and Command Administrative Assistant to the Adjutant General. His leadership culminated in his appointment as Chief of Staff for the Alaska National Guard in 1972, and later that year, his promotion to Brigadier General.

In 1974, after more than 20 years of distinguished military service, Bill transitioned to a new kind of public service as the state director for Congressman Don Young, a position he would hold for 24 years. He served the state through the heady days of the building of the Trans Alaska Pipeline System, the boom and bust economic turns, and during the Exxon Valdez oil spill, and the signing of the Alaska National Interest Lands Conservation Act (ANILCA) into law by President Jimmy Carter.

In a 2007 Congressional Record tribute, Rep. Young called Bill Sharrow “a truly great American” and praised his unwavering dedication to the people of Alaska. “When I was unable to attend an important function or meeting,” Young said, “it was Bill that I always trusted to represent me.”

Read the Congressional Record entry about Bill Sharrow at this link.

Congressman Nick Begich noted that his family played a large role in all of this.

“Bill Sharrow served the state of Alaska for nearly a quarter of a century as Don Young’s trusted right-hand man in the state. It takes a team to be Alaska’s only US representative, but it takes a team at home, as well. Thank you to Bill’s family for allowing him to serve all Alaskans for so much of his life,” Begich said.

Bill Sharrow and Chad Padgett shake hands in this 2019 photo. Padgett followed Sharrow as state director for Congressman Don Young from 2009 to 2019, when Padgett joined the Bureau of Land Management. Sharrow was attending Padgett’s swearing in ceremony at BLM in Anchorage.

Outside of his professional life, Bill was committed to his community and faith. In 1958, he helped found St. Bartholomew’s Episcopal Church in Palmer, and later became deeply involved at St. Mary’s Episcopal Church in Anchorage after the family relocated there.

Chad Padgett wrote this tribute to him:

“Just before his passing, I had the opportunity to speak with him. I was undergoing cancer treatment in Houston, TX and was feeling a bit down. I heard Bill was having a serious health issue so I called him to say hello. As always, Bill was strong. He knew his fate was sealed but because of his faith in God, he was not sad about passing as he absolutely knew where he was going, to heaven. Once again, as Bill had done many times throughout the 30 years I have known him, he cheered me up, made me laugh, and I forgot all about my woes. So even from his literal deathbed, there was Bill, guiding me and making me stronger in my belief in God and humanity. Since that day, not only do I have an even stronger faith in God, but know that Bill is by his side, likely arguing (in a good way), as he was known to do, with Congressman Young. Now with Bill, Congressman Young and Ted Stevens all in heaven, we have many Titans watching what we do with their legacies.

“Bill Sharrow wasn’t just a boss—he was a mentor, a friend, and a rare kind of leader who left a lasting imprint on everyone lucky enough to know him. He led with quiet strength, unwavering kindness, and an innate sense of humanity that shone in both big decisions and small, unnoticed moments.

“One memory that stays with me is on a cold (subzero) day in January Bill saw a woman who was cold and, without a second thought, took off his own coat and handed it to her. That was Bill: always paying attention, always ready to help, no matter the circumstance. It wasn’t for show—it was just who he was.

“And then there was his laugh—deep, warm, and unmistakable. You could hear it from down the hall or across a crowded room, and it had a way of making everything feel a little lighter. His presence brought comfort; his humor brought joy.

“Not many people know that Bill played a quiet but pivotal role in helping bring the Alaska Military Youth Academy to life. He believed deeply in the potential of young people and was always looking for ways to help them build full, productive lives. Whether it was creating new opportunities or encouraging service to the community, he understood the power of investing in the next generation.

“Bill’s legacy lives on in the people he believed in, the lives he touched, and the way he made all of us feel seen, heard, and valued. He will be deeply missed—but never forgotten.”

A devoted husband, father, and grandfather, Bill took immense pride in his family. He and Margaret raised three sons — David, Philip, and Steven — and delighted in their six grandchildren and two great-grandchildren. After retirement, Bill and Margaret cherished their time together traveling, particularly enjoying river cruises and warm holidays in New Zealand with family.

A celebration of Bill’s life will be held at 4 pm on April 24, at St. Mary’s Episcopal Church in Anchorage.

Bill Sharrow served with honor, humility, and heart, and he leaves behind a legacy of leadership and familial love that will be remembered by all who knew him.

North Dakota is 15th state to ban ranked-choice voting

Last week, the governor of North Dakota signed into law a ban on the use of ranked-choice voting in state elections.

North Dakota is now the 15th state to disallow the practice, which is used in Alaska elections after a 2020 ballot initiative passed with the backing of tens of millions of dollars in outside dark money.

“Now more than ever, we need a consistent, efficient and easy-to-understand voter experience across our entire state to maintain trust in our election system,” Gov. Kelly Armstrong said. “This is one more in a series of proactive, common-sense steps our Secretary of State and Legislature have taken to support election integrity.”

As a second attempt at repealing ranked-choice voting is under way in Alaska, here are the 15 states that have banned the novel voting system that was created by liberals to help Sen. Lisa Murkowski keep her seat in the Senate:

  1. Alabama
  2. Florida
  3. Idaho
  4. Kentucky
  5. Louisiana
  6. Mississippi
  7. Missouri
  8. Montana
  9. North Dakota
  10. Oklahoma
  11. South Carolina
  12. South Dakota
  13. Tennessee
  14. West Virginia
  15. Wyoming

North Dakota, West Virginia, and Wyoming are the latest additions, with their bans signed into law this year. Only three states — Alaska, Hawaii, and Maine — use ranked choice voting, as does the District of Columbia.

In Alaska, the petition to repeal RCV and jungle primaries was certified on Feb. 17, allowing sponsors one year to collect over 34,000 signatures for a 2026 ballot measure. To get on the 2026 primary ballot or general election ballot depends on when the Legislature adjourns in 2026.

To get onto the 2028 ballot, the group has until the first week of March, 2026 to turn in the needed signatures.

The new Alaska effort, Repeal Now, follows the narrow defeat of the first repeal effort in November, which lost by just 743 votes, despite millions of dollars in dark money from liberal entities outside the state fighting to convince Alaskans that ranked-choice voting gives them better results.

The two main political parties in Alaska are split on the voting method, with the Alaska Democratic Party supporting it and the Alaska Republican Party opposed.

Pedro Gonzalez: 907 Initiative hits Kenai voters

Kenai Peninsula residents recently received a letter addressed to Rep. Sarah Vance, urging them to contact her about increased funding for public schools. 

“Even if the legislature passes a modest funding increase, the school district is looking at increasing class sizes, taking away extracurricular sports support, reducing staff, closing pools, and reducing support to homeschool families,” the document states. “This is why we can’t understand why our representative, Rep. Sarah Vance, is one of the leading voices in the legislature against supporting our schools.”

The letter was paid for by the 907 Initiative, a dark-money political group known for championing progressive causes. The group has a history of organizing aggressive campaigns across the full spectrum of media and advertising to attack politicians in a way that avoids tripping over finance laws.

As a 501(c)(4), its donors do not need to be disclosed, but it is also restricted from engaging in primarily political activity, such as attempting the influence the outcome of an election.

In 2023, the 907 Initiative went to the mat against Dave Bronson, then the mayor of Anchorage, deploying a flurry of hostile ads. Earlier this month, it also produced ads against Anchorage House Rep. Mia Costello for the same reason it attacked Vance. 

The line between influencing public opinion and electioneering is fine, but the 907 Initiative knows just how to avoid crossing it amid its latest campaign.

On April 17, Gov. Mike Dunleavy vetoed a proposed $680 increase to per-student funding. In a column for Must Read Alaska, Vance said she supported that veto because the bill “did not include the necessary reforms to improve education outcomes for Alaskans.”

However, Vance noted that she was open to supporting additional funding for education and raising the BSA under the right conditions.

“The question isn’t just how much we’re spending but whether we’re getting the best results for our investment,” she wrote.

Proponents of raising the BSA argue that the per-student amount has not kept up with inflation. They also point to low academic outcomes that show Alaska lagging behind the rest of the nation, a problem that they say boils down to insufficient funds.

But it might not be that simple. Alaska spends more than any other state on K-12 education as a percentage of taxpayer income and is sixth in the nation for per-student spending. 

Republicans who are willing to boost spending on education, like Vance, say that there are tough choices ahead and have proposed measures such as school consolidation. Above all, they stress the importance of deliberation in navigating the challenges confronting Alaskans. In contrast, dark money groups prefer to simplify narratives while concealing their own agendas.

Pedro Gonzalez writes for Must Read Alaska.

Montana Republican Party censures nine Republican senators for abandoning party’s legislative majority

The Montana Republican Party formally censured nine Republican state senators for repeatedly aligning with Democrat lawmakers during the 2025 legislative session, which undermined the elected Republican majority in the state Senate, just as some Republican lawmakers have done in Alaska.

According to a statement released by the Montana Republican Party, the party’s executive committee voted unanimously to censure Sens. Jason Ellsworth, Butch Gillespie, Gregg Hunter, Joshua Kassmier, Gayle Lammers, Denley Loge, Wendy McKamey, Russel Tempel, and Shelley Vance. The censure vote took place during a meeting on March 27.

The rogue Republicans had had advance warning. The party issued a press release on March 13 criticizing the nine, stating that the senators “frequently aligned with Democrats, creating obstacles for the Republican majority in the Senate.” The release referenced actions beginning on Jan. 6, the first day of the 69th Legislative Session, when the senators joined Democrats to overrule Republican leadership and create a coalition government.

“The MTGOP calls on these senators to cease obstructing key Republican priorities and return to the faithful representation of their constituents and the Republican platform. If their actions continue to damage the integrity of the Republican majority, the party will consider additional steps to address the situation,” Montana GOP wrote in its warning. The nine ignored the warning.

As a result of the censure, the party said it would no longer recognize the senators as Republicans and would not provide them with political funding in future campaigns.

In response, eight of the nine censured senators — all except Sen. Jason Ellsworth — issued an open letter to the citizens of Montana, which said, in part, “We were elected to serve you, not to follow orders from political insiders… Let’s be clear: this censure is nothing more than a distraction — meant to cover up the fact that party leaders have failed to deliver on the core priorities you sent us here to address… This censure changes nothing. We’ll keep showing up. We’ll keep delivering. And we’ll keep putting Montana first.”

The coalition in Montana mirrors Alaska Legislature’s problems. Although Alaskans elect a majority of Republicans, since 2023, the Alaska Senate has been governed by a majority-democrat coalition, with a few Republicans joining in — Sen. Cathy Giessel, Sen. Bert Stedman, and Sen. Gary Stevens, and Sen. James Kaufman, who eventually left the Democrat coalition and rejoined the Republicans.

In the Alaska House, a couple of rogue Republicans joined with the Democrats to create a majority. They are Rep. Louise Stutes and Rep. Chuck Kopp.

Michael Tavoliero: Alaska’s carbon reality and why we must reject the green fallacy

By MICHAEL TAVOLIERO

Let’s start with a simple but uncomfortable truth: If you believe that carbon dioxide (CO₂) is an existential threat to the planet, Alaska isn’t the problem — Alaska is the solution. And yet, in a breathtaking act of self-sabotage, some members of our Legislature are trying to make us the scapegoat anyway.

Let’s break it down in numbers that even a Washington, D.C. bureaucrat could understand:

  • The average mature tree absorbs about 48 pounds of CO₂ every year.
  • Alaska has roughly 31.75 billion trees.
  • That means our forests soak up about 691 million metric tonnes (MT) of carbon annually.
  • Alaska’s total carbon emissions? About 42 million MT per year.
  • That’s right — we clean 16 times more carbon than we create.

Globally, Alaska contributes just 0.1% of total CO₂ emissions while removing 1.65% of global emissions — and our people make up a mere 0.009% of the planet’s population.

By any honest metric, Alaska isn’t the climate criminal the environmental left makes it out to be. We are the unsung heroes of carbon capture. Yet rather than celebrate that, radical activists and their political enablers want to strap Alaska’s economy to the wrecking ball of Renewable Portfolio Standards (RPS) and a suicidal obsession with wind and solar projects that don’t work, don’t pay, and don’t serve the people they’re supposed to help.

Where Is the Logic?

The premise is straightforward: we are told that human CO₂ emissions are heating the planet to catastrophic levels, and that every ton emitted must be urgently offset. Fine — let’s assume that’s true. By that logic, Alaska should be heralded as a global champion. We should be receiving billions in carbon credits annually — not fines, not penalties, and certainly not regulations designed to cripple our industries and impoverish our people.

But that’s not what’s happening. Instead, we’re being punished, bullied, and coerced into adopting unreliable, expensive, and destructive energy policies. All while the real carbon mega-emitters — China, India, and even the industrial giants of the Lower 48 — churn out pollution at staggering rates with zero accountability.

This isn’t science.
This is religion.
And it’s a false religion, complete with its own commandments, high priests, indulgences, and heretics.

At its heart, this obsession with Alaska’s “carbon footprint” isn’t about saving the planet. It’s about control — political, economic, and social control — over what was once the freest and most resource-rich frontier in America.

The Government Is the Problem, Not the Solution

Consider what’s happening right now:

  • The Legislature is pushing two RPS bills that would force Alaska utilities to buy unreliable non-firm energy like wind and solar — despite decades of evidence that these sources raise costs and weaken grid reliability.
  • Fire Island Wind, hailed as Southcentral Alaska’s green miracle, is now the most expensive regularly used power source in the region — and that’s based on a decade-old contract. New wind generation would likely cost 140% more.
  • Hydroelectric expansion projects like the Dixon Diversion and Watana Dam — proven, stable, and cost-effective — are being sidelined in favor of ideologically driven, federally subsidized solar and wind experiments.
  • Coal resources west of Skwentna, once eyed for strategic development, are left buried while activists demand more expensive imports from out of state.

Meanwhile, the federal government, under the banner of “carbon reduction,” continues to lock up Alaska’s lands, kill projects, and deny permits — all while depending on Alaska’s trees to quietly scrub their carbon emissions for free.

This is not environmental stewardship.
This is economic sabotage under the false flag of climate virtue.

The Logical Fallacy: Sacrificing Alaska to Save the World?

Let’s expose the fallacy clearly:

If Alaska already removes vastly more CO₂ than it emits, then further “reducing” our emissions would have no meaningful impact on global carbon levels. None. Zero. Zilch.

Yet we are being told — over and over — that we must “do our part” by sabotaging our own economy, raising energy prices, and turning our communities into powerless eco-serfs.

It’s like asking the janitor who already mops the entire building to also pay for the building’s cleaning supplies out of his own pocket — while the actual polluters and litterbugs get tax breaks.

It’s insane.
It’s immoral.
And it’s deliberate.

Alaska Should Be Paid, Not Punished

If carbon capture is worth anything, then Alaska’s forests represent about $33 billion annually in global carbon offsets at the going market rate of $51 per metric tonne. That’s $33 billion that could fund our schools, our roads, our energy infrastructure — and yes, even meaningful, targeted environmental stewardship.

Instead, we get lectured by environmental lobbyists who think Anchorage should look more like Portland, and Fairbanks more like Berkeley.

They want Alaska to be a theme park — a pristine, undeveloped playground for the green elite — while our people live under economic bondage, high energy costs, and a suffocating regulatory regime that kills jobs and hope in equal measure.

If the green left wants to turn Alaska into their personal carbon sink, then it’s time we asked: What’s the price of admission?

A Rallying Cry for Alaska’s Future

Alaskans, it’s time to wake up.

We cannot allow our state to be sacrificed on the altar of a false environmental gospel. We must reject the green colonialism that seeks to chain our future to someone else’s guilt.

We must:

  • Reject any Renewable Portfolio Standard that sacrifices reliability and affordability for ideology.
  • Defend our right to develop our natural resources — responsibly, sustainably, and in service of our own people.
  • Demand payment for our carbon capture instead of accepting federal dictates that punish prosperity.
  • Hold politicians accountable — every lawmaker who votes to raise your energy bills in the name of “carbon reduction” needs to be exposed, challenged, and removed from office.

Alaska is not a problem.
Alaska is a gift — to America, to the world, and to the future.

But if we don’t fight for it, they’ll bury us under lies, regulations, and false promises until there’s nothing left but a hollowed-out memory of the Last Frontier.

The time to act is now.
Defend Alaska.
Defend the truth.
And defend the right of Alaskans to build a future rooted in freedom, not fear.

Michael Tavoliero writes for Must Read Alaska.

Breaking: Dan Fagan, columnist at Must Read Alaska and radio host, has passed

It’s with great sadness that we report that Dan Fagan, legendary longtime journalist and radio host in Alaska and Louisiana, has passed after a few months of heart-related issues.

This story will be updated as more information becomes available.

Update: KVNT has set up a message line at 907-802-8812 so that Dan Fagan’s friends and admirers can leave message, share memories, or make tributes to Dan, and the messages will be shared with his family.

The family said that they know he was loved in Alaska, but they are asking for privacy and will hold a private service for the family.

Fagan wrote columns at Must Read Alaska in recent years and was the host of a radio show for KVNT, and before that he hosted a show for 650 KENI. He was a reporter for many years for Channel 2, and he wrote columns for the New Orleans Times Picayune News, NOLA.com, and the Advocate, Louisiana newspapers. He was the originator of The Alaska Standard news blog.

He moved back to New Orleans a few years ago from Anchorage to be closer to his aging mother and care for her in her final years. After her death, he moved to Biloxi, Miss., where, after an 18-month break from broadcasting he returned to radio, broadcasting his show from his home to the KVNT audience in Southcentral Alaska.

He could leave Alaska, but Alaska would never leave him.

He had been struggling with health issues in recent weeks and told this writer that his heart was going out on him but he was not afraid of dying because he knew where he would end up.

“He was a man of strong faith, his whole family was that way,” said Charisse Millett, a close friend in Anchorage.

Fagan was born May 12, 1960 and grew up in Metairie, Louisiana, which is in the New Orleans metropolitan area.

He died in his sleep over the weekend.