Sunday, September 7, 2025
Home Blog Page 5

David Boyle: Anchorage School District must revise its transgender guidelines to protect all students

We are all terribly saddened by the recent slaughter of two innocent school children and the other 18 injured students and staff at the Annunciation Catholic School in Minneapolis.

Two children were killed while they were praying as the Church of the Annunciation. Why would anyone murder little children?

We hope this never ever happens in our Anchorage Schools or in any Alaska schools, public or private.  

The Anchorage School District has taken proactive measures, such as school entry security portals and school resource officers in most of our schools. But further action must be taken to protect our students.

The Annunciation murderer has been identified as a transgender individual, a boy who identified as a female. This murderer also legally changed his name from Robert to Robin with his mother signing the legal renaming document. Unfortunately, the mother may not have recognized the seriousness of her son’s mental state. If she had been alerted to her son’s mental state, she may have been able to inform school officials and law enforcement, and this terrible tragedy may have been averted.

In the case of the Minneapolis tragedy, a former school teacher, Sarah Reely, says she noticed that the shooter had signs of self-harm and reported it. She said that self-harm can be a sign of someone needing help. She doesn’t know if any action had been taken due to her report.

Children with gender dysphoria often have underlying mental health issues that need to be addressed.

The ASD should take this tragedy as a lesson to update its “Transgender Guidelines,” which leave the parents out of a student’s decision to use different pronouns and names at school. Parents and school staff need to act as a team to protect not only the transgender from bullying, but more importantly, protect all students from tragic actions.

We also know that the Anchorage School District has “Transgender Guidelines” which hide a student’s name change from parents.  This could be the first step in realizing a student may have serious emotional problems.

Here is the specific language on hiding secondary students’ name changes from parents: 

“Secondary students: Generally, notification of a student’s parent about his or her gender identity, expression or transition is unnecessary, as they are already aware and may be supportive. In some cases, however, notifying parents carries risks for the student if the family does not support the student’s desire to transition. Prior to notification of any parent or guardian regarding the transition process, school staff should work closely with the student to assess the degree to which, if any, the parent/guardian will be involved in the process, considering at all times the health, well-being, and safety of the transitioning student.”

It is good that the safety of the transitioning student is considered.  But how about the other students? Their safety should be the primary concern.

If a parent is made aware of a child’s student name change by the district, this could be the first indication that the child is struggling internally and may need to be carefully monitored. Withholding this information from the parent may lead to more serious problems.

We do know that those children who identify as transgender or have gender ID problems have murdered some of their fellow students and teachers at a disproportionate rate. Here is a list of recent student shootings:

The above trend is undeniable. All the above murderers are either transgenders or have gender identity issues.  They all appear to have very serious mental health issues.

This is not a call for the school district to provide even more mental health counselors/psychologists. It is a call for the district to identify those with potentially serious mental health issues and refer their parents to the appropriate mental health professionals in the community.

Providing mental health within the district should not be one of the district’s missions.  Providing excellent classroom education should always be the primary mission of the district.

We ask that the ASD review and amend its “Transgender Guidelines” to ensure parents are included in all areas, especially student name changes and pronoun usage. And we ask that this become a policy of the school board, not merely “guidelines” which are not reviewed by the board.

It is past time to hide so-called “guidelines” from parents. Put these guidelines in school board policy so the public, especially parents, can see them and participate in the discussion.

We must make an all-out effort to prevent tragedies such as happened in Minneapolis.  We must keep all students safe.  

God forbid that the unthinkable happens and only the school district, because of your guidelines, knows about the transitioning student.

Anchorage School District, it is up to you.  You have the power and the tools to make our schools safer.

It’s time to protect all students, not just the transgenders.

David Boyle is an education writer at Must Read Alaska.

David Boyle: ASD employees cruise, a $10 million windfall for school district, your PFD sinks

David Boyle: I ‘DOGED’ the Anchorage School District and uncovered savings to fill its budget hole

David Boyle: The more we spend, the less we get in Alaska’s public schools run by the Education Cartel

David Boyle: Anchorage school superintendent melts down over 0.7% budget gap

Peggy Ann McConnochie: Juneau’s future needs big thinking, not Portland principles

By PEGGY ANN MCCONNOCHIE

When I served on the City and Borough of Juneau Planning Commission, we had to comply with Juneau’s Comprehensive Plan before making decisions about everything from building permits and code compliance to land use, zoning, and historic preservation. 

The Comprehensive Plan is updated every 10 years, and the process takes approximately three years. Juneau contracted with Cascadia Partners of Portland, Ore., to update our plan. It appears that the contract will cost taxpayers roughly $750,000.

According to their website, “guiding principles” for this updated plan were developed from public input received back in the Spring. I missed that, but did recently take the CBJ Comprehensive Plan survey on the “guiding principles.” I encourage residents to take the survey so that Portland contractors can understand whether these guiding principles truly reflect the needs and priorities of the majority of Juneau residents. 

The six guiding principles are:

Lifelong Wellbeing and Family SupportHousing For All; Resilient, Year-Round Local Economy; Environmental Protection and Climate Leadership; Connected Community and NeighborhoodsCulture and Community Identity.

On the surface, it’s hard to disagree with any of those, but some of the assumptions behind those headings raise some red flags for me. How about you?

The guiding principle “Housing for All” refers to compact and small-scale homes, which might be suitable for seniors or young singles. However, as a real estate professional with 43 years of experience, I know that most families want yards and safe streets for their children to ride bikes.  

Another assumption under “Year-Round Local Economy” was this:

“A sustainable future for Juneau includes more stable, year-round jobs, especially in small businesses and local industries like arts and entertainment.”

That assumption is not based on reality. What has sustained Juneau over the years is its foundational industries, which employ a large number of people, including government, mining, and tourism. The Kensington mine was the last major project to come online around 2010. Still, aside from tourism, nothing else has come to mind as foundational since then. 

Take a look at what’s been happening in Juneau. Families are leaving, and we’ve had to close schools. Small businesses have opened, and we have a nice arts scene, but more new businesses in those areas without people here to support them are bound to fail.  

Juneau needs some big things before we need any more little things.  The Huna Totem dock will help, and so will the Goldbelt development on the west side of Douglas.  The icebreaker and second channel crossing are both significant events and also very necessary.  However, the “Guiding Principles” don’t mention any critical points.  Is that on purpose?

This same guiding principle also mentions “… improving infrastructure such as the ferry system.”  We’ve been trying to do that for years. Still, the falling population in the Southeast has made significant improvements to the ferry system uneconomical.  Without a road, the only hope now is Cascade Point, but the guiding principles don’t mention that either.

Under “Environmental Protection and Climate Leadership,” the guiding principles include “…preserving ecosystems like the Tongass National Forest.”  That is not the job of the Juneau Planning Commission, and that should be omitted from the guiding principles of our plan. As far as energy independence is concerned, Juneau already leads the way in the number of electric vehicles and boasts 43 public charging stations, 21 of which are available for free. 

Finally, under the guiding principle “Connected Community and Neighborhoods,” the assumption seems to be that everyone in Juneau wants a “walkable, mixed-use neighborhood with local shops, schools, and green spaces nearby.”   As I mentioned before, many people wish to live in typical suburban neighborhoods!   The City has land near the proposed Goldbelt development on the west side of Douglas that could accommodate family subdivisions that would be attractive to Coast Guard families. That is something the city can easily do to open up options for new housing areas.

This section also says that public infrastructure should “reduce car dependency.”   Good luck getting people to take the bus to get to their boat in Auke Bay or to Eaglecrest to ski.  

My final comment concerns the omission of any mention of Juneau’s historic past or its efforts at historic preservation.  Considering the controversy surrounding Telephone Hill, this oversight may seem purposeful.

In conclusion, if Juneau is to grow and thrive, some of the assumptions in the “guiding principles” will have just the opposite effect and cause us to shrink even more.

PeggyAnn McConnochie is a Juneau resident since 1980 and a member of Capital City Republican Women.

PeggyAnn McConnochie: Make housing affordable again

Labor Day protest in Fairbanks draws small crowd outside City Hall

34

A small group of demonstrators gathered outside Fairbanks City Hall on Cushman Street for a Labor Day protest, carrying signs and flags in support of various causes.

The protest, made up of about 100 who were largely older participants, many of whom appeared to be retirees, featured Palestinian flags, Ukrainian flags, upside-down American flags, a sign in Spanish, and signs with messages such as “Equity for All,” “Due Process for All,” “Welcome the Oppressed,” “Resist Evil,” and “Stop Fascism.”

The event had the feel of a union-driven rally, though the turnout was modest compared to past Labor Day gatherings. Organizers and participants, many of them in their 50s and up, emphasized traditional labor themes mixed with broader social and political causes.

Photos from the scene show demonstrators spread across the steps of City Hall, their messages aimed at both local and national issues.

Photo credit: Robert Lype

Mat-Su Borough releases final candidate slate with party labels

The Matanuska-Susitna Borough Clerk’s Office has released the final, certified list of candidates for the Nov. 4 regular borough election, and, standing out from other Alaskan boroughs, Mat-Su designates candidates with a political affiliation on the ballot, whether registered to a party or noting “nonpartisan” or “undeclared.”

Certified Candidates by Office

Assembly District 1 (Palmer area):

  • Michelle Heun — Undeclared (Certified: August 19, 2025)
  • Michael Bowles — Republican (Certified: August 18, 2025) 

Assembly District 2 (Palmer area):

  • Dana Raffaniello — Undeclared (Certified: August 20, 2025)
  • Stephanie Nowers — Nonpartisan (Certified: August 26, 2025) 

Assembly District 4 (Wasilla area):

  • Maxwell H. Sumner — Republican (Certified: August 22, 2025) 

School Board District 2: Kendal W. Kruse — Republican, Gage D. Saxton — Nonpartisan (Certified: August 29, 2025) 

School Board District 5:

  • Brooks Pitcher — Republican (Certified: August 25, 2025) 

School Board District 7:

  • Lorie A. Colee — Republican (Certified: August 25, 2025) 

Under borough code, candidates may designate a political affiliation on the ballot if they are registered with a party or group, or may choose to appear as nonpartisan or undeclared. In the absence of any designation, “undeclared” is assigned by default.

Assembly races in Districts 1 and 2 feature direct contests between those with (District 1) and without party labels (District 2) in a region that traditionally leans Republican.

Trump says he’ll sign executive order to end mail-in voting, require voter ID

President Donald Trump announced over the weekend that he intends to sign an executive order banning most mail-in voting and mandating voter identification in federal elections.

“Voter I.D. Must Be Part of Every Single Vote. NO EXCEPTIONS,” Trump posted on Truth Social Saturday. “I Will Be Doing An Executive Order To That End!!! Also, No Mail-In Voting, Except For Those That Are Very Ill, And The Far Away Military. USE PAPER BALLOTS ONLY!!!”

Every state allows some form of mail-in voting. In several states, including California, Colorado, Washington, Oregon, Hawaii, Nevada, and Vermont, elections are conducted primarily by mail.

Trump has made election security a central issue since the 2020 presidential election, which was marked by widespread allegations of voter fraud from his supporters. In March, he signed an executive order establishing new voter ID requirements for federal elections and directing the Department of Justice to ensure that mail-in ballots are only counted up until Election Day. That order has been met with numerous legal challenges and is still under review in the courts.

The new executive order Trump is proposing could face similar challenges. While the Constitution grants Congress some oversight of federal elections, states have broad authority to regulate how elections are conducted. Any attempt to override state mail-in voting laws is expected to face immediate lawsuits, particularly from Democratic-aligned groups that favor expanding ballot access.

Alaska is a “no-excuse” absentee voting state. All registered voters can request an absentee ballot without providing a reason. While not a primarily mail-in state like Colorado or Washington, mail-in voting is strongly practiced, particularly in rural and remote communities where in-person voting can be challenging due to geography and weather. There have been numerous instances of voter fraud in rural precincts, linked to things like personal representatives voting for people and an overabundance of ballots being tuned in, in excess of actual number of registered voters.

Alaska Permanent Fund trustees meet Sept. 4, with cybersecurity on the agenda

5

The Alaska Permanent Fund has reached an all-time high, climbing to just under $85 billion, as the Alaska Permanent Fund Corporation (APFC) prepares for a pair of Board of Trustees meetings on Thursday, Sept. 4.

The day will begin with the Board’s Ethics, Audit & Cybersecurity Committee Meeting, which runs from 9 am to 1 pm and will focus on the Fiscal Year 2025 financial statements and external audit results. Trustees are scheduled to hear from audit firm KPMG, review year-end financials, receive updates on legal matters, and consider a cybersecurity audit.

Later in the day, from 1:30 to 4:30 pm, the regular meeting of the Board of Trustees will be held. On the agenda are approval of the FY25 Annual Audit, consideration of the proposed budget for Fiscal Year 2027, and committee reports.

Both meetings will be conducted virtually via Teams Webinar, with dial-in access also available. The public may register in advance online to receive a webinar link, or call in using the teleconference option. Opportunities for public comment are scheduled during both sessions, and written comments can be submitted at any time to [email protected].

The Alaska Permanent Fund, established in 1976 after voters approved a constitutional amendment to save a portion of the state’s oil wealth for future generations, was seeded in 1977 with $734,000 from oil royalties and has since grown into one of the largest sovereign wealth funds in the world, managed by the Alaska Permanent Fund Corporation. Its earnings have been used to help pay for state government services and, beginning in 1982, to provide annual Permanent Fund Dividend payments to eligible Alaskans. The fund’s balance is invested in a diversified portfolio that includes stocks, bonds, real estate, and private equity, with the principal protected by the constitution and only the earnings available for appropriation.

The Permanent Fund’s near-record balance comes as the corporation continues to navigate long-term investment strategies, budget planning, and governance oversight. With the Fund serving as the financial foundation for both the state’s annual Permanent Fund Dividend program and ongoing state services, the outcomes of these meetings will help shape future fiscal policy.

Meeting agendas, registration links, and teleconference details are available at the APFC Board Meetings webpage.

Alaska Permanent Fund sets another new all-time high, second time this month

Alaska’s Permanent Fund hits new peak

Bob Maier: Anchorage needs transparency in tax cap and exemptions to restore public trust

By BOB MAIER

As Anchorage navigates our governance it is increasingly evident that the lack of transparency in fiscal matters has eroded the public trust.  This was evidenced by the discussions resulting in the recent efforts to implement an Anchorage sales tax.  

An effort needs to be made by Mayor Suzanne LaFrance and Assembly Chair Christopher Constant to bolster the public trust by including the annual Tax Cap Calculation and an annual review of all real properties exempted from taxation into the independently audited Anchorage Comprehensive Annual Financial Report – (CAFR).

The Tax Cap Calculation, expressed as a mathematical formula, is a crucial component of Anchorage’s fiscal framework.  The formula is designed to protect property owners from significant tax increases while ensuring that the Municipality can generate sufficient revenue to meet its obligations. The formula starts with the previous year’s tax receipts and then is adjusted for several variables.  Bonds approved by voters, new construction, the Consumer Price Index, lawsuit settlements and changes in population are the factors determining the new taxation amount. 

Having an independent set of eyes review that the numbers being placed in the formula are the correct numbers is long overdue.

Secondly, Property Tax Exemptions must be independently audited on an annual basis. A listing of all exempted properties should be available on the Municipal website.  Exemptions granted for various businesses, non-profits and personal residences should not be granted unless there is a public hearing. The hearing should clearly identify the property ID number, address and the names of the owner(s).  Also needed to be provided is an estimate of the amount of tax that will be avoided both annually and over the term of the exemption.

A recent article in Must Read Alaska dated July 31, 2025 dealing with the process of how the Fire Island Bakery received a tax exemption exemplified the need for this annual independent review of all exemptions.

The primary purpose of including the Tax Cap Calculation and all properties exempted from taxation in the annual CAFR audit is not to find errors or omissions in the financial dealings of the municipality. Rather it is to ensure all residents, city officials, creditors, bond houses and any others interested in the records of the municipality that the items under audit have been prepared with due care and diligence and are in accordance with the appropriate financial standards.

Perhaps these independently audited components will build public trust and allow the conversation about an Anchorage Sales Tax to continue.  But having made these arguments during the debate concerning the Anchorage Alcohol Tax … I doubt it.

Bob Maier is an Anchorage resident and also a property taxpayer and utility ratepayer.

Glen Biegel: Alaska’s GOP governor’s race — early polls, big field, and a long road ahead

By GLEN BIEGEL

Politically speaking, where a week is an eternity, it’s early, and we have a long Republican Governor’s race ahead.  And when I say ‘Republican’, I am including the 10’s of thousands of voters who understand/like the pro-Alaska policies of Trump.  So about 62% of Alaskan voters.  Republicans, Libertarians, independents, non-partisans, and anyone else who understands that our vibrant future is found in the wise use of our lands, in energy and metals development, by maintaining fish and game harvesting, partnering with our federal agencies, and by overcoming our history of underperforming education, broken families, and crime in our largest city.  In other words, we’ve got a lot to talk, think, and pray about between now and voting day.   

Enter a significant number of candidates and mix in a few unscientific polls, and even one scientific poll, along with some great commentary on who is running and what chances they have, all things being equal. All things being equal… 

In politics, the one thing you can count on is that things are never equal. Let me give my “filter” on what things matter to me in a gubernatorial resume. 

  • Have you run for office? Running for office or being appointed is a great equalizer, as it gives the public a chance to review your life and make an informed decision. 
  • Have you made, or can you make, alliances with the bush, southeast, or rural areas? 
  • What is your knowledge of issues, and what are the proposed solutions versus one-liners that sound great but aren’t backed up? 
  • Do you understand how the state operates economically, and specifically the demands made on the State? 
  • Can you reach out to oil companies, builders, shippers, miners, and local dignitaries to contribute to your vision? Public vision always requires sacrifices and a lot of hands pulling in the same direction. 
  • Do you understand how the State operates politically? If you want something done, do you know what battles to fight, how to win that battle, and what all the parties are willing to barter for to get something done? 

OK, I promised a review of the polls, as suspect as they may be. When I say suspect, just know that any online poll is really an insider friends-and-family poll. Remember what Joe Miller got in trouble for on public computers? Seriously, not all the polls are online, and they ARE notable and provide some data. 

Let’s ignore the online poll. The other polls give us some initial data and some fun insights: 

With added awareness ratings of: 

Notes on this poll: 

This was taken exclusively from non-Democrat voters.   

I think that both favorability and awareness are hard to overcome, with favorability the easier of the two, as most people don’t really know what conservative politicians or candidates have said or done. 

The next poll was taken at the Ninilchik Fairgrounds, which I drove by twice on the way to and from Homer for a family reunion.

This may show that the Cygnal poll was somewhat biased or didn’t accurately measure the essential question of ‘who would you vote for?’.   

Let’s then synthesize the results from these two extremely questionable polls: 

  • Being in the current executive branch does not provide any extra brownie points. 
  • Lt. Gov. Dahlstrom is well-known among conservative circles, but how do they grade her time in office, and is there a trust factor that influences the vote? 
  • There are a large number of people in this race, and it will come down to small percentages. 
  • Campaign promises: Concrete, realistic, and deliverable? 
  • Who knows how the ranked choice system will play with the conservative base? The candidate who best plays ranked choice by convincing people to rank them as a trusted second choice may well win.
  • It’s sooo early.
  • I did notice that Shelley Hughes is listed near the top in each poll. I don’t even think she had announced for the first poll.  
  • I appreciate that we will be better informed in various aspects of the Alaska government, with input from legislators, business owners, as well as the former attorney general and the former commissioner of the Department of Revenue. This governor’s race should be educational, at the very least. 

Final thoughts: 

Money and energy become the mother’s milk of politics as they always are. If you are demonstrably conservative and electable, you can get to know the people in a small State like Alaska, e.g., Gov. Mike Dunleavy. However, you need to have experience, heart, soul, wisdom, and a past that can withstand public scrutiny. 

Good luck, all of you. Thank you for running for office, and God bless you and your families.

Glen Biegel is a technology security professional, Catholic father of nine, husband to a saint, and politically active conservative.

Glen Biegel: Dissecting Medicaid’s work requirement

Glen Biegel: Real Fed fight boils down to orthodoxy vs. economic growth

Glen Biegel: Dan Fagan inspired us to be our best selves

Glen Biegel: A conservative’s voting guide

 

Alexander Dolitsky: From whispers in Kiev to shofar blasts in Juneau, it’s been a journey of faith, freedom

By ALEXANDER DOLITSKY

The freedoms for people clearly outlined in the First Amendment of the US Constitution — speech, press, religion, assembly, and petition — are interconnected and foundational to democratic society, personal dignity, and social progress. They enable individuals to think, express, pray, and live according to their conscience and traditional values without government interference.

In our country, freedom of religion protects individual conscience, which includes both the right to practice a faith and the right to have no faith or protects a person’s innermost beliefs. The First Amendment prevents religious discrimination, protects the right of all people of the U.S. land, regardless of their faith by ensuring that the government cannot establish a religion or force citizens to conform to a particular set of beliefs. It also fosters a diverse society by allowing people to live, speak, and act according to their beliefs peacefully and publicly; religious freedom preserves a diverse and pluralistic society. 

During this summer season, I have been signing my books at the Hearthside Books in the Merchant’s Wharf in downtown Juneau — an engaging activity in meeting diverse tourists from all corners of the world. On one occasion, the relatively young orthodox-looking Jewish tourists from New York approached my table, purchased one title of my books, and during our brief communication, recognizing that I am a Russian-born Jew, offered to perform a blessing for me.

Certainly, why to refuse an offer of the sincere blessing. Indeed. Very quickly two young men displayed necessary items for blessing ceremony, secured two leather boxes (tefillins), one on my forehead just above the hairline, and centered between the eyes (tefillah shel rosh), and the other box on the bicep of my non-dominant left arm (tefillah shel yad). The box on my arm was angled toward the heart, and the strap is wrapped nine times down the arm and around the hand. These Jewish prayers are called tefillin. The practice is meant to fulfill the Torah’s commandment to bind the words of God “upon your hand” and “between your eyes.”

Inside each box are scrolls of parchment inscribed by a scribe with four specific passages from the Torah, which express the core tenets of the Jewish faith: 

  • Exodus 13:1–10: Reminds Jews of the Exodus from Egypt and God’s role in their liberation.
  • Exodus 13:11–16: Highlights the duty to teach Jewish values to future generations.
  • Deuteronomy 6:4–9 (The Shema): Declares God’s unity and commands the love and fear of Him.
  • Deuteronomy 11:13–21: Reiterates the rewards for observing God’s commandments. 

The placement of the tefillin on the arm and head symbolizes the devotion of a person’s intellect, emotions, and actions to serving God.

  • Head tefillin: Corresponds to the mind, focusing one’s intellect and thoughts toward God.
  • Arm tefillin: Placed near the heart, representing the submission of a person’s emotions and actions. 

The act of wrapping tefillin binds a person to their core values and traditions, reminding them of the covenant with God established at Mount Sinai. This practice is considered a mitzvah (commandment) for Jewish men starting at their Bar Mitzvah (age 13). A Bar Mitzvah is a Jewish rite of passage for a boy at age 13, marking his transition to religious adulthood, where he is held accountable for observing Jewish laws (mitzvot) and gains new responsibilities within the community. The ceremony, which can include reciting blessings and reading from the Torah during a synagogue service, is followed by a celebration, symbolizing his “son of the commandment” status.

After I was wrapped in tefillin, a young man pulled out from his pocket a small-size Torah, instructed me to repeat after him and recited the prayers from the Torah. Then he loudly blew Shofar that echoed around the Merchants Wharf Mall.

The Jewish horn used during ceremonies is called a Shofar. It is an ancient, sacred instrument, typically made from a ram’s horn. The Shofar’s sounds are considered a spiritual alarm clock, calling people to reflect, repent, and reawaken their connection to God and Jewish tradition. It recalls biblical events such as the giving of the Torah at Mount Sinai and the binding of Isaac. Throughout history, the Shofar was used to announce significant events, signal the start of a jubilee year, and even as a call to arms in battle. 

At the end of the ceremony, the young man asked me if I ever had this experience. I replied that in Juneau I organized a Bat Mitzvah for my daughter in the local synagogue when she was 12 years old, but I never was blessed until now. “Well, this was your Bar Mitzvah,” he acknowledged with a generous smile.

This spontaneous ceremony performed for my benefit by complete strangers from New York in the public place in Juneau brought my thoughts back to Kiev of the former Soviet Union. Being a Jew in the Soviet Union meant navigating systemic discrimination, state-sponsored anti-religious campaigns, and political persecution, particularly under the Stalin regime until the mid-1980s. Jews were labeled “outsiders” with disloyal “cosmopolitan” ties to Israel and faced quotas in education and various professions. While some assimilated Jews lived “normal” lives, religious observance and cultural expression were suppressed and often forbidden by the government. 

The Soviet state exercised anti-religious policies, promoted atheism, leading to the closure of synagogues, the banning of religious teachings, and the suppression of traditional Jewish schools. The state-controlled media often engaged in anti-Semitic propaganda. In short, Jewish cultural and religious life was suppressed under strict policies of discrimination. 

When I turned 13 years old, unexpectedly, my dear aunt Lilya invited me to the restaurant to celebrate my birthday. In fact, it was my first visit to the restaurant.

In the former Soviet Union, privileged individuals dined at a small number of high-end state-run restaurants. These restaurants, favored by the government officials and cultural celebrities, offered a level of cuisine and service unavailable or unaffordable to the public. Access to these exclusive establishments was often gained through connections, special permits, or the ability to pay the exorbitant prices, which could equal a significant portion of an average worker’s monthly wage. 

My aunt helped me to navigate through the menu and ordered appropriate food and beverage items for me. Then she presented to me a birthday gift (a soccer ball), leaned toward me and whispered: “Sasha, son, in a Jewish tradition, today on your 13th birthday, you become an adult.” Her voice was trembling, and tears appeared in the corner of her eyes. “Today is your Bar Mitzvah, a Jewish transition to religious adulthood. Remember this day,” she continued.

As I reminded my daughter during her Bat Mitzvah held in Juneau in 2004, “Elena, in America, we do not whisper our prayers, and we do not hide our faith. If we glow together as a nation and believe in the wisdom of Judeo-Christian values and traditions, our nation will survive and prosper.”

Alexander Dolitsky was born and raised in Kiev in the former Soviet Union. He received an M.A. in history from Kiev Pedagogical Institute, Ukraine in 1976; an M.A. in anthropology and archaeology from Brown University in 1983; and enrolled in the Ph.D. program in anthropology at Bryn Mawr College from 1983 to 1985, where he was also lecturer in the Russian Center. In the USSR, he was a social studies teacher for three years and an archaeologist for five years for the Ukrainian Academy of Sciences. In 1978, he settled in the United States. Dolitsky visited Alaska for the first time in 1981, while conducting field research for graduate school at Brown. He then settled first in Sitka in 1985 and then in Juneau in 1986. From 1985 to 1987, he was U.S. Forest Service archaeologist and social scientist. He was an Adjunct Assistant Professor of Russian Studies at the University of Alaska Southeast from 1985 to 1999; Social Studies Instructor at the Alyeska Central School, Alaska Department of Education and Yukon-Koyukuk School District from 1988 to 2006; and Director of the Alaska-Siberia Research Center from 1990 to 2022. From 2006 to 2010, Alexander Dolitsky served as a Delegate of the Russian Federation in the United States for the Russian Compatriots program. He has done 30 field studies in various areas of the former Soviet Union (including Siberia), Central Asia, South America, Eastern Europe and the United States (including Alaska). Dolitsky was a lecturer on the World Discoverer, Spirit of Oceanus, and Clipper Odyssey vessels in the Arctic and Sub-Arctic regions. He was a Project Manager for the WWII Alaska-Siberia Lend Lease Memorial, which was erected in Fairbanks in 2006. Dolitsky has published extensively in the fields of anthropology, history, archaeology and ethnography. His more recent publications include Fairy Tales and Myths of the Bering Strait Chukchi, Ancient Tales of Kamchatka, Tales and Legends of the Yupik Eskimos of Siberia, Old Russia in Modern America: Living Traditions of the Russian Old Believers in Alaska, Allies in Wartime: The Alaska-Siberia Airway During World War II, Spirit of the Siberian Tiger: Folktales of the Russian Far East, Living Wisdom of the Russian Far East: Tales and Legends from Chukotka and Alaska, and Pipeline to Russia: The Alaska-Siberia Air Route in World War II.

Alexander Dolitsky: When we were allies

Alexander Dolitsky: The West provoked and prolonged the Russia-Ukraine war

Alexander Dolitsky: Why cross-cultural literacy matters more than ever

Alexander Dolitsky: World War II altered the American diet, and we grew larger

Alexander Dolitsky: The Communist Control Act of 1954 and an escape from the Soviet Union

Alexander Dolitsky: It takes courage to confront antisemitism and terrorism