Tuesday, May 12, 2026
Home Blog Page 369

Shape-shifting: Peltola denies her support for Biden, waffles on Kamala, dodges questions

It’s anything for a vote at this point. Mary Peltola on Tuesday abandoned her endorsement of President Joe Biden during a private press conference with selected members of the mainstream media. She said she never endorsed him. And she dissed the Democratic Party by not publicly committing to its nominee for president, now that Biden is out.

But facts are harder to abandon. To the Anchorage Daily News in April of 2023, Peltola said, “We don’t always see eye to eye, but President Biden has impressed me with his support for Willow and his commitment to civil, constructive discussions. I’ll support him as long as he continues to include Alaskans in those discussions.”

In December, she is on record saying that Biden was one of the sharpest people she had met in Washington, D.C.

By July, she was singing a slightly different tune. She said Trump would win Alaska by a landslide. This, even while the chairman of the Democratic National Committee said that ranked-choice voting could deliver Biden a win in Alaska.

“Alaska is not in play in the presidential race and that last I heard, Biden was 33 points behind Trump in Alaska,” Peltola told the Fairbanks News Miner. “The last presidential election cycle, it was 10 points above for Trump.”

She said in early July, “I don’t think there is any benefits to Alaskans weighing in on this issue,” Peltola said. “My opinion is irrelevant.”

But today she decided she was relevant once again and weighed in on campaign issues with reporters — but on a Zoom call.

Having endorsed Sen. Lisa Murkowski in 2022, and Biden in 2023, Peltola now has left the door open to vote for Trump, she said – depending on who Kamala Harris picks as her vice presidential candidate.

Although she won’t endorse Harris for now, she must vote for her in August. Peltola is the top-elected Democrat from Alaska who will be a delegate to the Democratic National Convention, where the formal nomination takes place. The delegation has endorsed Harris.

Also as Alaska’s top-elected Democrat and darling of the party since she beat Sarah Palin in 2022, she would normally be given the honor of announcing the delegation’s vote on the floor of the convention. But now, she has insulted her fellow Democrats by not committing to supporting the Democrat chosen to replace Biden.

She told reporters today, ““Looking at this presidential race, my position is whoever the president is, that is the person that I am interested in working with to help Alaska move forward,” Peltola said. “Whether that president is Donald Trump, or if that president happens to be Kamala Harris … there will be a lot of common ground. There will be a lot of things that we collectively agree on,” according to Alaska Public Media, while refusing to say who she will vote for.

What will also matter next January is who Peltola will vote for for House Speaker. Her record shows she voted for Hakeem Jeffries, the radical Democrat from New York, 18 times in 2023. Jeffries lost to Kevin McCarthy, the Republican.

Peltola’s campaign and political action committees are spending millions of dollars on ads supporting her campaign, but the National Republican Congressional Committee political action committee has just ramped up spending against Peltola.

David Eastman: American history will move faster going forward

By DAVID EASTMAN

In the beginning of a change the patriot is a scarce man, and brave, and hated and scorned. When his cause succeeds, the timid join him, for then it costs nothing to be a patriot.” — Mark Twain

If you were waiting for a signal to get right with God, let July 13th’s foiled assassination be that moment. There is nothing more important.

With the passing of each minute, history marches slowly on, but the progress of individual nations can unfold at a truly alarming pace. We are currently experiencing such a time in America.

It has now been a full 15 years since Barack Obama promised to “fundamentally transform the United States of America” and Michelle Obama declared “we’re going to have to change our traditions, our history; we’re going to have to move into a different place as a nation.”

That “different place” is now coming into focus. Based on the recent guilty verdicts against Trump, Harvard Law Professor Alan Dershowitz believes it to be somewhere in the vicinity of South America. He may not be far off.

Likewise, Michelle and Barack’s public commitment to “change our traditions”, once abstract, is now as tangible as the bag of cocaine found at the White House, the classified documents found in Joe Biden’s garage, and the certain knowledge that no one will ever be prosecuted for either crime.

Fifteen years on, Washington, D.C. now looks a lot more like the place that Barack and Michelle Obama called home just before moving into the White House. As it has for many years, Chicago continues to rank first in public corruption convictions per capita. In addition to being the place the dead go to vote, Chicago will soon be home to a presidential library. No less than four of Illinois’ last ten governors have served time in federal prison, most of them from Chicago.

When Michelle Obama spoke in 2008 of the need to change “our history“, only a few Americans envisioned the toppling of George Washington statues, the removal of national monuments from places like Arlington National Cemetery, and the cancelling of Memorial Day Ceremonies that have been faithfully observed there for more than half a century. Our history is under attack by the left today precisely because it is this history that ties us to the words of the Declaration of Independence; both at the outset of the American Revolution, and again at the close of the Civil War.

After World War I, President Calvin Coolidge gave fitting homage to the Declaration of Independence with these words:

“If all men are created equal, that is final. If they are endowed with inalienable rights, that is final. If governments derive their just powers from the consent of the governed, that is final. No advance, no progress can be made beyond these propositions. If anyone wishes to deny their truth or their soundness, the only direction in which he can proceed historically is not forward, but backward toward the time when there was no equality, no rights of the individual, no rule of the people.”

We have, for a time, been moving backward as a nation, away from these seminal truths. It is time we made an about-face.

Crossing the Rubicon

On January 10th, 49 BC, Julius Caesar flaunted Roman law by publicly crossing the river Rubicon and marching his legions into Rome itself. For more than a century, Roman law checked the ambition of any Roman general who might be tempted to use the Roman military against the city. With that single fateful act, Caesar made clear that he was no longer a military general subordinate to the Roman Senate, he meant to rule it.

Despite the unparalleled power of serving as commander-in-chief of the most formidable military force in human history, no U.S. president has permitted himself to be seen as supporting the arrest and prosecution of another party’s presidential nominee, or denying them adequate protection—until now. It takes the breath away, or should, if we stopped long enough to reflect on where we are in the story of our nation. Let’s not mince words. A government that stakes its legal authority on decisions made by an individual who cannot be legally prosecuted (due to his declining mental health) is—by definition—above the law.

Our justice system now functions as a weapon with which to wage political war

It was from Danbury Prison that Steve Bannon, former White House Chief Strategist under Trump, learned of the most recent assassination attempt against President Trump. I spoke with Bannon after his conviction. His focus was on the nation and not on himself. He is a patriot at a time when it costs you dearly to be one. Former White House trade advisor, Peter Navarro, also learned of the assassination attempt from behind bars at FCI Miami. Both Bannon and Navarro were imprisoned by the Biden Administration at the behest of the January 6 Committee.

Former White House National Security Advisor, General Michael Flynn, was to have been locked up as well, until it was discovered that he only cooperated with the charade because the deep state had threatened to put his innocent son in jail unless he went himself. The documentary of what happened, Flynn, is top-notch and should be required viewing for every American. It is pivotal to understanding the threat that America currently faces from Washington, D.C.

Of course, Donald Trump wasn’t supposed to be in Pennsylvania on Saturday either. He, too, was supposed to be in prison by now, after having been indicted more than 16 months ago. All told, he was indicted on more than 90 charges, and has now been convicted of 34 felonies. Not long ago, Americans reading the headline “Former U.S. president convicted of 34 felonies” would look to see whether the trial had taken place in North Korea or Iran, or some place even more obscure. Not today.

Author Naomi Wolf pulled no punches in her recent op-ed “What time it is: The imprisonment of Steven K. Bannon“. One of the loudest dissident voices against the Biden Administration, the host of Bannon’s War Room, is now legally permitted phone calls of no more than 15 minutes, and totaling no more than 5 hours each month until his release, timed to coincide with the November election. Other dissenting media voices such as One America NewsThe Gateway Pundit, and Free Speech Systems are currently facing legal assaults designed to shut them down. That place you and I were hoping we would never get to as a nation; we’ve now arrived. This is a point of no return.

No Neville Chamberlain or other politician looking to appease the left will be able to lead us through the current storm. Many of our current political leaders rose to prominence in a system that rewarded their every effort to pacify the left. The days ahead now call for exactly the opposite. As that early American Samuel Adams declared in his own day, for those who cannot make this transition, who love wealth better than liberty, “go from us in peace.”

We now need men and women who are willing to be, in the words of Mark Twain, “brave, and hated and scorned.” We are going to need our Trumps and Bannons and Navarros and Flynns and many others like them whom we do not yet know. The current storm has left us no other choice.

David Eastman is a state representative for Wasilla House District 27.

Fairbanks leftists seek to quash free speech of conservatives through bogus ethics complaints

By SUZANNE DOWNING

The use of ethics complaints as free speech suppression is taking place in the Fairbanks North Star Borough Assembly, where efforts to stifle the opinions of conservative members are underway. Think of it as ethics “law fare.”

At the July 25 Assembly hearing, the Assembly will take up an ethics complaint brought against Assemblywoman Barbara Haney by pro-Hamas activist Kristin Schupp, who is the wife of school board member Bobby Burgess.

The ethics allegation involves the words and opinions regarding an actual official position of the borough Assembly.

Borough code is clear on what is an official statement of the Assembly in 3.04.130. It states that (A) The official position of the Assembly is that taken as a result of debate and vote, with the prevailing majority forming the official position.  Provision (B) states that Views and Opinions of individual members of the Assembly are not the official views of the Assembly.  

Thus, anytime an individual is giving an opinion, it is simply that, an opinion. One would think that this is particularly so if it is in an opinion column that is clearly labeled, “opinion.” 

An opinion column by Assemblywoman Haney in the local newspaper apparently spurred the complaint.

It started back on Feb. 20, when a column by Haney was published by the Fairbanks Daily News Miner. It referred to the events around the vote for a special election to raise the tax cap and spend more taxpayer money. In that vote, Assemblywoman Liz Reeves Ramos cited capital projects, such as crumbling stairs at Lathrop High School and asbestos contamination at Tanana Middle School as projects that needed to be addressed and required raising the tax cap.

The projects had not been vetted by the Assembly, nor were they part of the Capital Improvement Project list. Tanana Middle School asbestos abatement was suppose to be part of a remodel project a few years ago and Assemblymember Haney wondered how that could still be an issue. 

Haney further asked why there was no stairwell replacement program at Lathrop High School in the Capital Improvement Project list, and if the stairs were indeed faulty, why were classes still being held at Lathrop. 

The Assembly then voted to hold the Special Election on May 7, and the proposal was resoundingly rejected by voters of the borough.

The story does not end there. 

According to the Schupp complaint, the column written by Haney in the News Miner failed to use the specific phrase “in my opinion as a private citizen,” in an opinion column and did not clearly state she was not writing on the behalf of the Assembly. 

Borough code 3.04.130 is very clear: “Views and opinions of individual members of the assembly are not the official position of the assembly.” Haney wrote the opinion piece from her private email and signed it, “Barbara Haney, North Pole, Alaska.” The newspaper is the entity that added that she was an member of the Assembly.  

By borough code, the matter should never have even been referred to the ethics committee by the borough clerk.  Curiously, a part of borough code that is aimed at public testimony, 6.12.010(O)(2) was applied to the opinion writer even though this had never been done before.

In a subsequent editorial by Assemblywoman Haney regarding the animal shelter, she began the piece with “In my opinion as a private citizen.”  Schupp then wrote a response:

“In Ms. Barbara Haney’s recent community perspective she states that she is commenting in her capacity as public citizen. However, Ms. Haney is still an elected official on the FNSB assembly. Which means that she should still act as would be fitting for a representative, with decorum and truthfulness. Ms. Haney however seems to relish being dramatic and bombastic. She repeatedly demonstrates that she is either willfully ignorant to facts or willfully misleading the public. Both are unacceptable in her position,” Schupp wrote in the Fairbanks News Miner in May.

Schupp is intent on silencing Haney.

The Ethics Committee, with new members appointed by Presiding Officer Savannah Fletcher (now running for state Senate), determined that Haney violated borough ethics, but recommended no punishment.  However, Haney will now have that ethics violation on record. 

Under the new interpretation of borough code given by the ethics committee, several current members of the Assembly have also failed to include the “in my opinion as a private citizen” language, and that none of the training materials of Assembly members included coverage of the need to use that language in opinion pieces as well as in public testimony. The Assembly majority can impose any punishment they want, and the seven member majority will do as they wish. 

But it’s clear that only Haney was selected for enforcement of this provision and is selected for ethics violation. 

Presiding Officer Fletcher could have chosen to leave the matter and move on to matters that are important to citizens. Instead, Fletcher decided to give the phony charge oxygen at the Assembly in order to give Schupp and her allies an opportunity to bash Haney publicly.

This is the same Savannah Fletcher who prosecuted Rep. David Eastman and attempted to remove him from office, and the same Savannah Fletcher who prosecuted Sen. Lora Reinbold and who ridiculously litigated the Mat-Su library book review case. 

Ultimately at issue is the right of free speech.

Under the recent Supreme Court decision of Linke v Freed, elected officials do not lose their rights to the first amendment.  Another Supreme Court decision, Houston College, also codifies the right of public officials to write, publish editorials and opinion pieces. That ruling clarified that censure and other measures are reserved for actions at the dais, and not for expressions of public sentiments. 

While it may be that stating something is an opinion is appropriate for testimony before a board or commission or press releases, it is pretty clear that opinion pieces in an opinion column in the opinion section of the newspaper are simply that, opinions.  

Members of the public can submit comments on this matter at the next borough assembly on July 25. Emails can be sent to [email protected] or one can testify in person or electronically. 

To testify, a person can sign up by calling the clerk at 907-459-1401, sign up at the assembly chambers, or can sit through the Thursday evening testimony and wait for an opportunity to speak.

Peltola refuses to endorse Kamala Harris publicly but will vote for her at Democratic National Convention in August

Rep. Mary Peltola told a CNN reporter that she will make no endorsement for Kamala Harris for president.

“Rep. Mary Peltola, the congresswoman running in a tough reelection in Alaska, among the small number of Dems yet to endorse Kamala Harris,” wrote Manu Raju, a senior political reporter for CNN. To date, there are five Democrats in Congress who have demurred, as Kamala Harris, the presumptive Democrat nominee, may be unpopular with their constituents.

“As a human being I do support her. I do not make any endorsements, though, politically,” Peltola falsely told Raju. Last year, she endorsed President Joe Biden, while Republicans like Vivek Ramaswamy said keeping Biden propped up as a candidate was “elder abuse.”

Polling in Alaska shows that President Donald Trump is all but assured to win the state in what could be a landslide. Peltola is calculating that endorsing Harris would damage her brand and risk her own reelection campaign.

And yet, Peltola is a senior member of the Alaska Democratic Party nominating delegation and the delegation will vote in August for Harris as the party’s nominee. The state delegation, which includes Peltola, quickly already endorsed Harris on Monday, shortly after a national phone call among all state delegations, which have unanimously endorsed Harris immediately after President Joe Biden was said to have signed a letter saying he will not run again.

As of publication time, Biden has not been seen in public for six days. First Lady Jill Biden has also not been seen. President Biden is reportedly returning to the White House on Tuesday and is scheduled to speak to the American public from the Oval Office on Wednesday about why he dropped out of the race.

Watch video: Republicans’ new TV ad exposing Peltola’s bald-faced lies about Biden’s brain

A new television ad is running in Alaska, sponsored by the National Republican Congressional Committee, and it’s directly focused on the dishonesty of Rep. Mary Peltola, who told Americans on national television that President Joe Biden was mentally fit to be president.

White House records show that Peltola met with the president in private on three occasions last year, in addition to the many large-group functions she attended where the president was the host. She also met with Vice President Kamala Harris in private last September.

Screenshot of White House visitor logs

This is the second ad that the NRCC has done pointing out that Peltola has lied to Alaskans about Biden, but this is the group’s first television ad. Alaska was chosen to have the first television ad produced by the NRCC in any campaign this year, showing that the political action committee intends to prioritize Alaska’s congressional race.

The NRCC has not run TV ads against Peltola in any significant way in the past. It stayed out of Alaska’s mixed-up congressional election in 2022, which included both a special primary, special general, regular primary and regular general, after the death of Rep. Don Young.

Thus, Inside Elections, a poll analytics group, has now shifted the race from “lean Democratic” to “tilt Democratic” in a move toward Republicans, because Peltola is facing her first serious push back through television ads. The shift is also an acknowledgement that Donald Trump will likely carry Alaska easily.

Alaskans will go to the polls in August to determine the top four congressional candidates who will appear on the November ballot. Alaska, since 2022, has held an open primary and a ranked-choice general election. The open primary means that it’s likely that three Republicans and Democrat Peltola will go to the general election ballot, something that may give her an advantage, as it did in 2022.

The ad the NRCC ran previously this summer was on digital platforms only:

Breaking: Secret Service Director Cheatle resigns

The Associated Press reports Tuesday that Secret Service Director Kimberly Cheatle has resigned, following her disastrous testimony before the House Oversight Committee on Monday, and following the agency’s lack of accountability during the assassination attempt against Donald Trump.

The pressure had mounted on Cheatle, with an impeachment charge filed against her on Monday by a representatives and with congressional members from both parties demanding her resignation or firing.

According to AP, she wrote her resignation to the staff in an email:

“I take full responsibility for the security lapse. In light of recent events, it is with a heavy heart that I have made the difficult decision to step down as your director.” 

Update: A statement was just released by the White House and attributed to President Joe Biden, who has not been seen for six days:

“Jill and I are grateful to Director Kim Cheatle for her decades of public service. She has selflessly dedicated and risked her life to protect our nation throughout her career in the United States Secret Service. We especially thank her for answering the call to lead the Secret Service during our Administration and we are grateful for her service to our family.

“As a leader, it takes honor, courage, and incredible integrity to take full responsibility for an organization tasked with one of the most challenging jobs in public service. 

“The independent review to get to the bottom of what happened on July 13 continues, and I look forward to assessing its conclusions. We all know what happened that day can never happen again. As we move forward, I wish Kim all the best, and I will plan to appoint a new Director soon.”

Geo-location project: Phone associated with would-be assassin tracked to locations in D.C.

A cell phone associated with the home and work locations of would-be assassin Thomas Matthew Crooks was tracked by private investigators to a building in Washington, D.C., that houses both the Gallery mall and offices of the FBI, the Heritage Foundation’s Oversight Project reported on Monday.

The Oversight Project began a geo-location investigation soon after the July 13 attempted assassination of Donald Trump at a fairground in Butler, Penn.

Crooks was killed by a Secret Service counter-sniper after shooting at Trump and the crowd just after 6:11 p.m. Trump avoided death by turning his head slightly as he was speaking. A man behind him was killed and two others injured in the spray of bullets.

Read the report and see the maps of the Oversight Project’s geo-location investigation into the phone in question at The Blaze.

The Oversight Project reported on X, “For those that are tracking this type of data, we identified devices that were located at Crook’s home and his work within the past year. There were at least 9 devices linked to these AD-IDs We are willing to cooperate with legitimate investigations and share further information. For the protection of whistleblowers and our investigation, we will not be sharing further information with the congressional task force due to the connective tissue between that entity and FBI, USSS, and other entities.”

Judge upholds petitions in repeal of ranked-choice voting, which means it will be on the ballot in November

A judge has denied election attorney Scott Kendall and his Alaskans for Better Elections group in their efforts to disqualify the repeal of ranked-choice voting from the November ballot by lawfaring the petition booklets submitted to the Division of Elections.

The decision, granted on Friday, ended up in favor of the group that worked to collect tens of thousands of signatures over the course of a year.

Alaskans for Better Elections deployed paid spies to check on the people who were circulating the repeal petitions, to make sure they were not violating statute or regulations that govern petitions. The Alaskans for Better Elections group, with a trio of plaintiffs, challenged dozens of petition booklets and produced videos showing that sometimes the booklets were left unattended, which would be a violation of regulations governing initiative petitions.

But in the end, only a couple of dozen petition books were disqualified by the judge, and enough remained to exceed the minimum required to ask voters if they really want to stick with open primaries and ranked-choice general elections — the type of voting method ushered in by 2020’s Ballot Measure 2, a product of Outside dark money playing in Alaska’s election system.

One claim made by Alaskans for Better Elections is that one of the persons who notarized over 60 booklets had allowed her notary seal to expire. The Division of Elections had decided that this was the kind of error that the petitioners — Alaskans for Honest Elections — could fix. Alaskans for Better Elections objected to the Honest Elections group being able to repair that problem.

In another example, the plaintiffs said there was no way a person could collect over 500 signatures in one day. That was ruled unfounded because Alaskans for Honest Elections was able to show video of the busy venues they went to, including the Alaska State Fair and an event at the Palmer Train Depot, where former Gov. Sarah Palin was the star attraction.

Another example was when business owners who were in charge of petition booklets left them unattended while they left the room. Some of the instances of unattended booklets were caught on video or in photographs by the paid spies of Alaskans for Better Elections; some of those spies embedded themselves into the Alaskans for Honest Elections volunteer group to build the case and the Honest Elections activists had no idea at the time that there were double agents.

Attorney Kendall bought an expert witness from California who advises people on initiative packages before they are filed. That man told the judge that many of the petition booklets were very suspicious. He said that he found one incident where a petition book sponsor had three books going at one time.

But, during deposition he was asked if that is against the law. It is not. The man’s accusations, like this one, fell apart one at a time.

The judge ended up throwing out 27 booklets for various reasons, but in the end, over 34,500 signatures in 33 House districts were acceptable to the judge — more than enough to qualify for November’s ballot.

Congressman files article of impeachment against Secret Service Director Kimberly Cheatle

Republican Florida Rep. Greg Steube said today he has filed articles of impeachment against Secret Service Director Kimberly Cheatle, who dodged questions during an intense hearing today in the House Oversight and Accountability Committee. During that hearing, members from both parties demanded Cheatle resign, which she refused to do.

Last year, Steube was one of a handful of congressional representatives who filed impeachment articles against President Joe Biden; these were not taken up by the Senate, however.

The article of impeachment against Cheatle is for dereliction of duty by failing to ensure the safety of Donald Trump, who is the leading 2024 Presidential candidate. The Secret Service made decisions that enabled a shooter to target and injure President Trump in an attempted assassination, and to kill an American citizen who was behind Trump.

“The Secret Service calls themselves ‘one of the most elite law enforcement agencies in the world’. What happened under their watch in Butler, Pennsylvania was an international embarrassment and an inexcusable tragedy,” said Steube. “Today I’m exercising our Congressional authority of oversight by filing an article of impeachment against Director Cheatle for her dereliction of duty as it relates to the assassination attempt on President Trump’s life. As she said herself in a recent interview, the “buck stops with me.” Multiple confirmed reports show that the Secret Service Sniper had the would-be assassin in his sights for almost 20 minutes. How was the would-be assassin not neutralized before he shot? Every supervisor in that chain of command should be fired immediately and that starts with the Director.  An American hero is dead and several severely wounded as a result of the Secret Service failure to protect President Trump. There are also multiple reports that Trump’s detail had repeatedly requested additional resources for safety and were denied.  All in the chain of command including the Director should be held responsible,” Steube wrote in his statement.

“Particularly after her abysmal testimony today before the Oversight Committee, where little to no questions were properly answered and she doubled down on her refusal to resign, we have no choice but to impeach Director Cheatle,” he said.

It’s been widely reported that the Secret Service knew of a threat to President Trump before he went out on stage, and that agents had identified the shooter as a person of interest over an hour before the shots were fired.

A Secret Service counter sniper had spotted the shooter on the rooftop with a direct line of sight to President Trump’s stage 20 minutes before the shots were fired.

“By Providence alone, President Trump survived the attempt on his life while being grazed by a bullet that injured his ear. Tragically, a rally attendee, Corey Comperatore, was fatally struck by a bullet in the attack and other rally attendees were injured,” Steube said.

View the Impeachment Article linked here

In his impeachment articles against Biden in 2023, Steube listed crimes of bribery, extortion, obstruction of justice, fraud and financial involvement in drugs & prostitution as reasons to impeach Biden.

Steube said the president had undermined the integrity of his office, brought disrepute on the Presidency, betrayed his trust as President, and acted in a manner subversive of the rule of law and justice at the expense of America’s citizens. The evidence continues to mount by the day – the Biden Crime Family has personally profited off Joe’s government positions through bribery, threats, and fraud. Joe Biden must not be allowed to continue to sit in the White House, selling out our country.”

Those articles of impeachment were as follows:

Article 1: “Robert Hunter Biden (Hunter Biden) and James Biden sold access to then Vice President Joseph Robinette Biden, Jr. (Joe Biden) while he was in office from 2009 to 2017 and sold promised access to a future Biden Presidential Administration while he was out of office from 2017 to 2021. Hunter and James appear to have promised official actions by Joe Biden in return for payments and business opportunities from foreign and domestic business partners. Joe Biden assisted by making appearances, phone calls, meeting with the ‘business partners,’ and knowingly allowing his family members to promise access to him and actions by him in furtherance of these schemes. Hunter Biden threatened business partners that official actions could be taken against them if they did not meet terms or make payments. In at least one instance, Hunter implied that Joe Biden was aware of these threats and willing to assist in enforcing the threats, potentially through official actions. Hunter Biden attempted to enrich himself and the Biden family by threatening official actions from his father, who he claims was willing to assist in the scheme. These acts are abuses of power as well as the following federal crimes or conspiracy to commit the following federal crimes: Bribery of Public Officials, 18 USC § 201; Hobbs Act Extortion ‘Under Color of Official Right,’ 18 USC § 1951; Honest Services Fraud relating to use of official position, 18 USC § 1346.”

Article 2: “According to testimony from IRS whistleblowers, members of the Biden campaign improperly colluded with Justice Department (DOJ) officials to improperly interfere with investigations into tax crimes alleged to have been committed by Hunter Biden. These acts constitute an abuse of power as well as Obstruction of Justice, 18 USC §§ 1505, 1510, 1512.”

The Senate, run by the Democratic Party, refused to take up the articles last year. Still run by Democrats, with Vice President Kamala Harris as a spare vote if there was a tie, it’s unlikely this article of impeachment will proceed.