Wednesday, July 29, 2026
Home Blog Page 270

Congressman Begich named vice chairman of House subcommittee on energy and minerals

Nick Begich III is moving on up.

Congressman Begich has only been in Congress for two weeks, but has already been appointed to three committees — one more than most members serve on. Now, he’s been named vice chairman of the House Subcommittee for Energy and Mineral Resources. The subcommittee focuses on issues critical to Alaska and the nation, including national security concerns.

The appointment was announced by House Resources Chairman, Rep. Bruce Westerman of Arkansas, who has been a strong ally of Alaska’s economy.

In the position, Begich will be better able to advocate for commonsense policies on oil, gas, alternative energy, mining, and access to resources.

“I want to thank Chairman Bruce Westerman for this appointment and the opportunity to serve as Vice Chair of the Subcommittee for Energy and Mineral Resources. I consider this appointment both an important responsibility, and an opportunity, specifically for the state of Alaska, which hold some of the richest energy and mineral resources in the world,” said Begich.

“Unlocking Alaska’s resources is crucial for creating jobs, driving economic growth, and strengthening America’s energy security. As Vice Chair, I am ready to get to work advocating for policies that encourage investment, rationalize regulations, and support the development of Alaska’s vast resources,” Begich said. “By harnessing Alaska’s potential, we will put America on a path to reestablishing the United States as a clear leader in energy and mineral production and the downstream manufacturing that results from these industries.”

Chairman Westerman expressed confidence in Begich, who he supported in 2024’s election cycle: “Alaska is home to a vast swath of our nation’s energy and natural resources and holds one ofthe keys to making our nation energy dominant once again. I’m confident that Rep. Begich will be the voice for all of Alaska on our committee and a strong advocate in getting our priorities across the finish line.”

Last week, Westerman sent a letter to President Joe Biden and Department of the Interior Secretary Deb Haaland regarding their decision to jeopardize American energy, economic, and conservation interests by withdrawing 625 million acres of federal coastal waters from future oil and gas leasing, including in Alaska.

“Your withdrawal of these areas betrays decades of progress and abandons the workers and communities relying on offshore energy development for their livelihoods. By ceding ground to OPEC, Russia, China, and other foreign adversaries, you have put American energy security and economic stability at risk for the sake of fleeting-political optics. This decision is not just a misstep–it is a willful act of sabotage against the American people and our future,” Westerman wrote.

“For two years, the American people waited for the release of the 5-Year National OCS Program, only for it to become the most pathetic in history — delayed, underwhelming, and maliciously drafted,” Westerman wrote. “The December release of a Draft Programmatic Environmental Impact Statement (PEIS) was far too late to prevent delays to Lease Sale 262, which BOEM officials have openly admitted will not take place in 2025, as your own plan required. With this withdrawal, your administration has effectively slammed the door on future development in critical regions, including the Gulf of Mexico, the Atlantic, the Pacific, and the Northern Bering Sea of Alaska.”

Confidence in military returns, Army recruitment soars as Trump becomes president again

In a remarkable turnaround for the U.S. Army, the force is already halfway to meeting its fiscal year goal of recruiting 61,000 soldiers. And it’s only three months into the new fiscal year. Recruitments are up 25% over last year.

The Army barely met its recruiting goal last year, which was substantially lower than this year’s goal of recruiting 55,300.

The Army already has 30,000 enlistments for this year, an increase over the 24,000 that had enlisted by this time last year. The federal fiscal year starts Oct. 1.

Under President Joe Biden, the military has seen the worst recruitment numbers since the Vietnam War, which ended 50 years ago, on April 30, 1975.

Challenges facing military recruitment include a vast majority of American youth who are fat, out of shape, and have related medical issues resulting from diet and lack of exercise.

According to the Centers for Disease Control, About 16.1% of American children and adolescents ages 2–19 are overweight, and 19.3% are obese. The health agency says one in every three American youth are overweight or obese.

Another challenge has been perceptions of the military as being “woke,” more concerned about equity politics than warrior competencies.

Biden’s disastrous decisions surrounding the pulling of troops from Kabul ended in the deaths of 13 US military servicemen. He executed that operation agains the counsel of his top military advisers who predicted the collapse of the country’s government to the Taliban. The Taliban took control before the last US military jet had left the Kabul airstrip on Aug. 30, 2021, stranding at least 1,000 American citizens, and abandoning tens of thousands of our Afghan allies, who were hunted and killed by the Taliban. Biden left behind at least $7 billion in US military equipment that the Taliban took control of.

It was the beginning of an inauspicious four years for the military, which saw recruitments drop dramatically.

Pete Hegseth, President Donald Trump’s nominee for Secretary of Defense, has said that recruitment will be a top priority, and has alluded to the new Biden military culture of political and racial grievances had been part of the military’s difficulty in getting people to join.

Democrats oppose and are attacking Hegseth’s appointment for all kinds of reasons, mainly that he is likely to carry out Trump’s goal of “Make America Great Again.”

Greenland, USA: What are Alaskans saying about Donald Trump bringing in a new territory?

In the weekly “Question of the Week” poll that is a feature of the Must Read Alaska newsletter, Alaskans are favorable toward the idea of Greenland becoming a new United States territory.

78% of the nearly 600 respondents so far are supportive of President Donald Trump’s idea of purchasing the island of Greenland from Denmark.

Midway through the poll at the Must Read Alaska newsletter, the favorability for Greenland, USA is strong.

Must Read Alaska’s newsletter is published Monday, Wednesday, and Friday. The question of the week always ends Thursday mornings and results are published in each Friday’s edition.

You can subscribe to the newsletter at this link.

Greenlanders are also in favor of joining the United States, according to a recent poll by Patriot Polling.

Patriot Polling surveyed 416 people in Greenland, which has an adult population of only around 32,000. It’s the first poll to ask Greenlanders what they think.

Trump has for months floated the idea of buying Greenland from Denmark. His idea has gotten traction in recent days.

Not everyone is onboard. Alaska Sen. Lisa Murkowski is on record saying the idea is “offensive.” She is in the never-Trump, anti-Trump camp. Congressman Nick Begich III called it “history defining.”

Americans hired Trump to be president because he has big ideas and is a change agent. Buying more territory for the USA is something a change agent would do. Why would Americans hire a change agent and then tell him he can’t be a change agent?

Americans may be ready for some big ideas after the Biden years. According to a recent Gallup poll, Americans give a negative assessment of President Joe Biden’s time in office,

“Majorities of Americans think the U.S. has lost ground in six areas over the past four years, including the federal debt (67%), immigration (64%), the gap between the wealthy and less well-off (60%), the economy (59%), the United States’ position in the world (58%) and crime (51%). Pluralities also say the nation has fallen behind in six other areas: education, terrorism, trade relations with other countries, race relations, the nation’s infrastructure and energy,” according to Gallup.

Trump would not be the first to try to add Greenland to US territory. Secretary of State William Seward wanted to buy Greenland in 1867 and President Andrew Johnson considered it, as did President William Taft in 1910.

Greenland is especially rich in minerals and has been a mining province since the 1700s. First populated by Vikings, it went into Danish control and in 1953 Denmark formally added it as part of its kingdom.

Congressman Nick Begich III of Alaska seems open to the idea of a Greenland, USA territory:

“In 1868 US Secretary William H. Seward, the architect of the Alaska Purchase, identified Greenland as an acquisition target that could stabilize our nascent supply chain w/critical minerals like cryolite, while bolstering US naval reach. Today, we know that Arctic routes in the waters off Greenland are more crucial than ever and that a strengthened US presence in the region enhances global security. Further, an inclusion of Greenland as a U.S. territory would substantially expand the national portfolio of critical minerals and other important resources while enhancing the way of life for local Greenlanders. Concepts like these are history defining, and despite being ridiculed at the time, Alaskans are thankful for the vision of William Seward in architecting the Alaska Purchase,” Begich wrote on X last week.

Pro-Alaska Kate MacGregor is added to Trump Administration at Interior Department

President Donald Trump named Katharine MacGregor as his deputy secretary of the Interior Department.

MacGregor served I that role in the Department of Interior during the first Trump Administration and is known for her effectiveness in pro-energy and pro-hunting policies on public lands.

Joe Balash, a well-known Alaskan who was Interior assistant secretary of lands and minerals (BLM) in the first Trump Administration, gave his unvarnished opinion on MacGregor, when called by a reporter from POLITICO.

“I don’t want to be too flippant about it, but they’re not f—ing around,” said Balash, who served with MacGregor in the department during Trump’s term. “Kate’s been there. She knows how it works. She’s there to make things happen. … This is no time for on-the-job training.”

MacGregor assumed office in February 2020, succeeding David Bernhardt, who was being promoted to secretary of the Interior. Bernhardt is now on Trump’s transition team for the Interior Department. North Dakota Gov. Doug Burgum is the Trump nominee for secretary.

MacGregor knows how the department works. She staffed the United States House Committee on Natural Resources from 2011 to 2017, where she earned high praise from Rep. Don Young and the Congressional Western Caucus.

She served in several positions at the Department of Interior after Trump took office in 2017, including Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary – Lands and Minerals Management.

MacGregor worked on issues such as improving responsible domestic energy and mineral development, combating missing and murdered American Indians and Alaskan Natives, and enhancing rural broadband, all issues important to Alaskans.

Burgum as secretary of Interior will have someone backing him up who has deep experience in Washington and who has the bonafides to advance the Trump America First priorities.

Raw deal: Medicare out-of-pocket costs have soared under Inflation Reduction Act

By ANDY MANGIONE | AMAC

America’s seniors won’t be fooled. The Biden Administration and its congressional allies passed the ironically named Inflation Reduction Act (IRA) in 2022 without attracting a single Republican vote, touting the legislation as a win for bringing down drug costs for Medicare beneficiaries. What its backers didn’t say is that the law would cause seniors’ out-of-pocket Medicare costs to dramatically increase and irresponsibly limit drug access while siphoning Medicare off to other Democrat pet projects. 

Seniors know that the IRA dealt them a raw deal and they’re furious, as a recent AMAC Action-sponsored poll conducted by ProMark Research reveals. The broad consensus among seniors over the IRA’s impact on Medicare costs, drug access, and green energy subsidies is significant given that the survey is drawn from a diverse group of 800 participants, with political affiliations spanning 39% Republican, 33% Democrat, and 25% Independent and which is 46% men and 54% women. 

Respondents were particularly outraged over the IRA’s changes to Medicare’s prescription drug coverage program (Part D). A staggering 83% expressed concern about rising premiums. Now, keep in mind that the IRA’s backers promised to make the Medicare Part D beneficiaries better off by mandating caps on out-of-pocket expenses and limiting base premium increases. And part of that plan meant shifting costs to insurance companies serving Part D. As a result, Part D premiums in some cases increased by over 400% in just two years. Some companies have left the Part D market, leaving Medicare beneficiaries with fewer plan choices and restricted access to care. 

Adding to their frustration, respondents viewed subsidies to insurance companies meant to hide the rising cost of premiums (in an election year) as a misuse of taxpayer money. An overwhelming 78% of the senior voter respondents opposed ongoing government subsidies to insurance companies. These subsidies were part of an 11th hour “demonstration” gimmick the Biden administration cobbled together to rescue the act from some of it’s most damaging, but predictable, consequences. 

For seniors on fixed incomes, even small increases in healthcare costs can be devastating. Respondents frequently cited fears of being priced out of their plans and losing access to critical medications. The narrowing of prescription drug plan options—down 11% in 2024 and projected to drop another 26% in 2025—compounds their concerns. 

Major drug companies have already cited the IRA as the reason for pulling back on their development of new drugs, because with price controls, they don’t have the money for research. It can cost more than  $2.5 billion just to develop a single drug. This is going to hurt seniors, who  take more prescription medications  than the general population. There has been a reported 36% decline in new drug trials just since the Act’s passage. And 135 curesfor diseases may never be developed as a result of the IRA, according to University of Chicago economist Tom Phillipson. Seniors are justly alarmed over delayed or lost advancement in life-saving treatments and cures, with 86% of seniors in the survey agreeing that efforts to reduce costs should not hinder access to essential medications. 

The survey revealed that seniors are particularly incensed about taxpayer-funded green energy subsidies. The poll reveals that 83% of respondents are either “very concerned” or “somewhat concerned” about billions of taxpayer dollars benefiting a small, wealthier segment of Americans. They’re understandably upset that the IRA is diverting hundreds of billions of dollars from Medicare programs toward green energy schemes such as electric vehicle credits, which almost exclusively benefit people with substantial incomes. The policy could scarcely be more out of touch with the everyday struggles of average Americans, particularly seniors living on fixed incomes. 

One of the strongest takeaways from the AMAC Action poll is the overwhelming support among seniors for reallocating IRA funds back to Medicare. Across the political spectrum, fully 85% of respondents agreed that Congress should redirect funds diverted from Medicare for green energy subsidies and other initiatives to reduce Medicare costs for seniors. Many argued that these funds should be used to lower premiums, reduce out-of-pocket expenses, and expand coverage options—critical priorities for their financial and physical well-being. 

The AMAC Action poll underscores the growing consensus that the current trajectory of Medicare under the IRA is unsustainable and requires immediate attention. Seniors are united in calling for the realignment of federal spending priorities to better serve their healthcare needs. In fact, a decisive 70% of respondents support pausing or suspending the IRA’s implementation to address its flaws or consider a repeal.  

At a minimum, the incoming Trump administration should pause execution of this harmful program long enough to gather feedback and implement needed reforms to mitigate its damaging consequences. Better yet, the Trump administration should use the pause to navigate the law through full repeal. 

Andy Mangione is senior vice president at AMAC Action, the advocacy affiliate of AMAC – Association of Mature American Citizens, an organization representing Americans who are age 50-plus. This column provided courtesy of Real Clear Wire.

Phil Izon decides to drop his ranked-choice voting repeal petition, allowing second group to take lead

Phil Izon, who spearheaded the first campaign to repeal ranked choice voting in Alaska, said today that he is withdrawing his petition to avoid confusion, since there is another group trying to do the same thing.

In a statement to Must Read Alaska, Izon said:

“I have made the decision to withdraw my petition to repeal Ranked Choice Voting.

“For the past two years, I’ve dedicated myself to the fight against Ranked Choice Voting (RCV), working tirelessly to protect the integrity of our election systems. Together with incredible grassroots support, we’ve made remarkable progress: helping six states prevent the adoption of RCV, debating three Alaska legislators, three Oregon legislators, the father of RCV in Oakland and San Francisco, and even Presidential Candidate for the Libertarian Party Chase Oliver.

“Despite being outspent 100 to 1 by out-of-state interests pouring $15 million into defending RCV, we stood strong, losing by only a fraction of a percent after two weeks of counting. We fought not only in the court of public opinion but also in Alaska’s legal system, where we successfully defended our ballot measure with unanimous victories in both the Alaska Superior Court and the Alaska Supreme Court.

“Though we fell just short this time, I firmly believe RCV is on life support. Momentum is building across the nation, and I’m already offering my support to efforts in Maine and here at home in Alaska to continue this important work. This isn’t the end—it’s another step in the fight to ensure fair, transparent elections for all. Thank you for standing with me in this journey; together, we’ll keep moving forward.

“With the formation of a new group dedicated to repealing Ranked Choice Voting (RCV), I have made the difficult decision to withdraw my application. I believe it’s important to avoid duplicating efforts and the potential confusion of having two repeal measures on the ballot simultaneously. My hope is that this new group can achieve their goal—it’s not an easy task, but I fully support their mission and wish them success in this important endeavor.

“I will finish my two new petitions soon and I look forward to having everyone’s help on those,” Izon said.

At the same time Izon was filing his application on Dec. 16 for a petition to try to repeal RCV at the ballot box for the second time, a second group was also filing, and it has people such as Bernadette Wilson, Judy Eledge, and former Rep. Ken McCarty involved.

Their petition to the Division of Elections, also filed Dec. 16, is under review and they should be getting an answer back by mid-February, along with petition booklets so they can start the process of getting enough signatures to get the question on the next general election ballot.

The second group, which is yet to adopt a name, believes they have the political muscle behind them to get the repeal passed and they believe they can raise the money to fight the Outside dark money referred to by Izon, who is now turning his attention to his other petitions — requiring photo ID at the ballot box and a move to paper ballots.

Bernadette Wilson, who is the spokesperson for the other group, said, “We are excited to take another shot at ending ranked choice voting as one united front. Ranked-choice voting disenfranchises, and discriminates against voters and Alaskans are ready to repeal. Even after $15 million was spent lying to Alaskans about what a repeal would do, the repeal failed by less than 700 votes. We feel very optimistic heading into 2026 that Alaskans will refuse to be duped again.”

Wilson was the manager of the last conservative ballot measure to pass in Alaska — the 2010 parental notification law that pertained to minors receiving abortions without their parents’ knowledge.

Pete Hegseth faces first committee in confirmation hearing for Defense Secretary

Pete Hegseth faces his first Senate confirmation hearing on Tuesday, before the Senate Armed Service Committee at 5:30 a.m. Alaska time.

He will make his case for becoming the Secretary of Defense in the Trump Administration in a committee that Sen. Dan Sullivan, a Marine veteran, serves on. Legacy media says the hearing will be “grueling.”

In advance of the hearing, at 9 a.m. Eastern time, a group of supportive Navy SEALs will meet at the Vietnam Memorial Wall and march to some of the war memorials around Washington, D.C., concluding their march near the U.S. Capitol, where they will hold a rally for Hegseth. Some 500 Navy SEALs are signed up to attend the event to support Hegseth, who is a combat veteran, author, public speaker, and Fox News contributor.

Pete Hegseth, who has met recently and separately with Sen. Dan Sullivan and Sen. Lisa Murkowski of Alaska, was accused of sexual assault years ago in a case that is difficult to prove. The local prosecutors chose not to prosecute it due to flimsy evidence. Hegseth has also been accused of abusing alcohol. He says that was years ago and he is a different person now.

SEALS and other veterans will fill the room where the first confirmation hearing will take place.

Sen. Roger Wicker of Mississippi is the Republican Chairman of the committee and Sen. Jack Reed of Rhode Island is the leading Democrat. The Democrats are expected to launch a full-scale assault on Hegseth over the sexual assault allegations, as well as his commitment to the Trump agenda, which they oppose.

Some of the leading Democrats include Massachusetts Sen. Elizabeth Warren, a foe of Trump, and Sen. Mark Kelly of Arizona. The full committee membership is at this link.

Watch the hearing at this link.

Royal flush? Mayor LaFrance’s big gamble on casinos

Quietly at the New Year, Anchorage Mayor Suzanne France issued a letter of support for a proposed Native-operated gambling casino in Eagle River, on land owned by the Eklutna Native village. She wrote it on behalf of all of Anchorage.

LaFrance’s Jan. 3 letter to the federal Bureau of Indian Affairs said it’s the municipality’s official position to support the gambling casino:

“The Municipality of Anchorage values and respects our government-to-government relationship with the Native Village of Eklutna.

“The Native Village of Eklutna’s goal to develop a gaming facility on its land is clearly within its right to facilitate self-sufficiency, self-determination, and economic development under the Indian Gaming Regulatory Act.

“The Native Village of Eklutna has a long history of excellent stewardship of the land and water in the Municipality, including salmon streams, and the project’s Environmental Assessment reflects that, raising no significant concerns.

“The Environmental Assessment also shows the project will create shared economic benefits, including more than 450 jobs during construction that will add $45.8 million to our local economy. Once operating, the project will support 419 workers and generate $67.6 million in economic value. Positive economic spill-over effects would boost surrounding businesses, hotels, and workers.

“We’d like to formally share our support for the Native Village of Eklutna as it exercises its sovereignty and pursues economic development.”

The casino would be the first in Alaska and would open the door to casinos in places that don’t seem like “Indian Country,” such as small parcels of land in Juneau and Craig.

Residents of the Birchwood neighborhood near Peters Creek have filed a lawsuit to stop the casino that has already been given the OK by the National Indian Gaming Commission. They are concerned about traffic and other pressures on their residential neighborhood.

Los Angeles Fire Dept DEI video that’s rocking the world. Short version: Need rescuing? It’s your fault

A diversity-equity-inclusion video from the Los Angeles Fire Department has surfaced, in which the deputy chief, an overweight woman, says if you need to be rescued, it’s your fault: You we’re “in the wrong place.”

Deputy Fire Chief Kristine Larson says the department priority is that residents in crisis are rescued by first responders that “look like” them.

“You want to see somebody that responds to your house, your emergency—whether it’s a medical call or a fire call—that looks like you,” Larson says.

“It gives that person a little bit more ease, knowing that somebody might understand their situation better,” Larson continues. “‘Is she strong enough to do this,'” Larson asked, rhetorically answering criticism she has heard. “Or ‘You couldn’t carry my husband out of a fire.’ Which my response is, ‘He got himself in the wrong place if I have to carry him out of a fire.'”

In other failures of the Los Angeles emergency response, an official text message went out on Thursday to nearly all Los Angeles residents, telling them to evacuate immediately. The message was received by people in Long Beach to the south and Dodger Stadium neighborhood.

“This is an emergency message from the Los Angeles County Fire Department,” the notice read. “An EVACUATION WARNING has been issued in your area.”

The message was only intended for people near the Kenneth fire near Woodland Hills.

In a related breakthrough, the Kenneth fire is considered an arson incident and a homeless man has been taken into custody for intentionally starting the Kenneth fire.