Saturday, May 9, 2026
Home Blog Page 1635

Sara Rasmussen: No better reason, no better time

8

By SARA RASMUSSEN
CANDIDATE HOUSE DISTRICT 22

She’s just a mom. And pregnant – how could she ever be successful legislator? Her hormones must be going crazy. Look at her, with that blonde hair – she looks like a pageant w**re. She’s just a stupid little girl.

Those words, spoken about me since I stepped out to run for office, are written on sticky notes, attached to my bathroom mirror. Every morning, they motivate me to press on and remind me that nothing worth doing is easy.

She’s a Republican and I won’t vote for her. (Kind of closed-minded, but predictable.)

She’s too young. (Not as true as I might like to think, but I get it.)

She’s conservative and I’m not. (A fair reason not to give me your vote.)

She’s a mom. Seriously?

My name is Sara Rasmussen. I’m a residential real estate appraiser, a lifelong resident of my district, a wife, an entrepreneur, and I also just happen to be mother of a sweet little boy with a little girl on the way. When my husband and I made the decision that I would run for public office, I knew that the path would be riddled with obstacles and difficulties.

To newcomers, the financial and time commitments to a campaign create barriers to entry that are high and unforgiving; this reality all too often keeps many good men and women from running for office at all.

I expect, given the current nature of our country’s politics, to have a door or two slammed in my face. But, I have to admit that I find it alarming — at a time when politicians from across our state and our nation stand accused of sexual harassment and assault, extramarital affairs, and corruption – that any person would dismiss my candidacy simply because I’m a mother of small children.

I mean really, what better reason could I possibly have to run for office?

Moms possess an amazing ability to solve complex problems. They’re among the best negotiators in the world (have you ever tried to convince a toddler to do something?) and they’re naturally inclined to protect everyone around them. Moms are observant, dedicated, and passionate – the qualities that just about everyone, of every political affiliation, wants in their elected officials.

Being a mom shouldn’t be seen as a handicap to accomplishing great things in society.

Anchorage’s Kikkan Randall just won a GOLD medal for team USA, and she’s a mother of a toddler.

Marie Curie, who won a Nobel Prize and whose work led to the development of the X-ray scanner, did so as a single mom of two daughters.

Kathy Headlee, a mother of seven, started Mothers Without Borders to help orphaned children around the world.

I could go on and on. Moms are a cornerstone of a healthy society, and we can’t continue to force them out of the public square.

I can’t stomach any more news stories about people being shot on our streets or kids hit by stolen cars. My heart still aches for families of Alaskans who have been made twice a victim; first, by the crime itself, and then, by the injustice of watching the perpetrator walk away without penalty because of a bad bill called SB 91.

I can’t stand by while the leaders of our state take away the PFD bit by bit, stealing away parents’ opportunity to invest in their child’s college education, and then threatening new taxes in the very next sentence.

I won’t sit quietly while the budget deficit continues to grow and grow, forcing ordinary, hardworking people to bear the weight of a government that is addicted to spending money.

These aren’t abstract problems. They’re right in front of our faces and we can’t ignore them any longer.

We need new, strong, and independent leaders to break the cycle of bad government, and I want to earn your trust as one of those leaders.

I don’t want to talk bad about my opponents – I know them both and they’re nice people. But they’ve also both already had a shot to solve problems in Juneau, and honestly, I don’t think either of them have earned another term by their actions. It’s nothing personal, but I feel less safe today than I did before they were elected, and judging by the messages I’ve received so far in my campaign, I’m not the only one who feels that way.

Being a legislator and a mother isn’t going to be easy – I know that. But I’m willing to make whatever adjustments necessary to give my neighbors, my family, and my friends a representative in government who has their best interests at heart. I am so fortunate to have an amazing and supportive husband to serve alongside me on behalf of our community, and our family is so excited for the opportunity to go to Juneau together to fight for all Alaskans!

Chances are, you may catch me waddling down your street in the coming weeks, before my daughter’s birth.  I’ll be back out as quickly as I can after she’s born, as I’m committed to getting out there and learning what issues matter to you.  I’d love the chance to meet you and your family.

I’m only going to make one campaign promise this year, and I hope it’s a strong start on the journey to earn your vote: I will fight with everything I have, as only a mom can, for my children and for yours.

And if that commitment makes me a “stupid little girl” – well, I’m okay with that.

Sara Rasmussen is a candidate for State Representative in District 22 (Sand Lake, Anchorage). You can learn more about her and her campaign at SaraForHouse.com.

 

Murkowski: Gasline construction costs will be impacted by tariffs

7

Higher steel tariffs imposed on China by President Donald Trump will add up to a half a billion dollars to the proposed AK-LNG project, said Sen. Lisa Murkowski last week.

Murkowski was on a panel with Sen. John Cornyn of Texas, who is Senate Majority Whip. The two spoke during CERA Week, a Houston energy conference.

Murkowski was asked if her constituents had raised a concern about the unavailability of certain kinds of steel.

“This is a big deal up north, as we’re trying again to build out so much of this that we’ve been waiting for. Again, whether it’s actual  pipe itself or the infrastructure that is going into these drilling operations…A lot of discussion about Alaska’s LNG and the opportunities that we will have, looking to build an 800-mile pipeline. Where are we going to get that pipe?

“The back-of-the-envelope numbers is that with these tariffs, we might be in a situation where it’s not only hundreds of millions, it might be as much as a half a billion dollars added on to the most expensive infrastructure project that we have seen in this country. So these are real numbers. This has real impact,” Murkowski said. “This is not coming at a good time for us.”

Last week, Keith Meyer, the head of AGDC, brushed off reporters’ questions about the impact of increased tariffs, saying it would not add much to the massive project, which is estimated to cost between $43-60 billion.

[Watch the panel discussion about energy and trade]

Also last week, Alaska Sen. Dan Sullivan joined six other Senators, including John Barrasso of Wyoming, Joni Ernst of Iowa, and Lamar Alexander of Tennessee, who signed a letter to Trump in which they asked him to consider alternative measures and withdraw his tariff order.

[Read the letter to President Trump]

More job losses, population leaving state

0

Alaska’s employment was down 0.5 percent in January, 2018 compared to a year ago.

That represents another 1,600 jobs the state has lost, or an average of 133 jobs lost per month, according to the Alaska Department of Labor.

Oil and gas employment was down by another 5.9 percent, with a loss of 600 jobs, and the construction sector lost 2.5 percent, or 300 jobs.

Federal employment was down 2.1 percent, or 300 jobs, while state government was down by only 0.8 percent, or 200 jobs, and local government by 0.5 percent, 200 jobs.

The only two industries to add jobs were health care, which was up  3 percent,  or 1,100 jobs, and transportation, warehousing and utilities with an increase of 0.5 percent, or 100 jobs.

Alaska’s seasonally adjusted unemployment rate increased one-tenth of a percentage point to 7.3 percent, up from 6.5 percent in January of 2017. The comparable national rate for January was 4.1 percent.

Alaska’s not-seasonally adjusted rate was 8.1 percent, up eight-tenths of a percentage point from December.

Unemployment rates rose in all areas except Dillingham and the Aleutians, where winter fisheries buoyed employment. Aleutians East and West also had the lowest unemployment rates in the state, at or near 3 percent. Rates were highest in areas that depend on summer tourism, such as Denali Borough and Skagway, and rural areas with few jobs, such as the Yukon-Koyukuk and Kusilvak census areas.

In January, the state released estimates showing that over the past two years, Alaska has lost nearly 9,000 people, and 2017 was the fifth year in a row for net migration loss, the longest losing streak ever for the state.

Alaska has the highest population turnover of any state. Forty one percent of the population of Alaska was born in the state, compared with 32 percent in 1980, but the population is highly migratory, according to the Department of Labor.

In Alaska there is a remarkably stable out-migration rate as people leave the state for jobs, higher education, military transfer or other personal reasons. What varies most is the in-migration rate, which plummets during economic downturns and does not sufficiently offset the steady annual outflow. Conversely, in-migration leaps during times of strong job growth, which combined with the natural birth rate leads to periods of overall population growth.

[Read former Gov. Sean Parnell: Alaska needs to bring jobs back]

Should the PFD be enshrined in Alaska’s Constitution?

HOUSE DEMS SAY YES, GOVERNOR SAYS MAYBE, SENATE GOP SAYS ‘SLOW DOWN’

The Alaska House Democrat-led majority is looking at enshrining the Permanent Fund Dividend into the Alaska Constitution.

But not a full dividend, just some portion of what it might have been under the original formula.

Public testimony will be taken on HJR 23 at 1:30 pm on Monday, March 12, and again on Tuesday. 

[Read details of HJR 23 here.]

Paul Seaton, co-chair of House Finance, is likely to reveal more details of the plan this week. HJR 23 is sponsored by Rep. Chris Tuck, Gabrielle LeDoux, Bryce Edgmon, Paul Seaton, Neal Foster, Scott Kawasaki, Jonathan Kreiss-Tomkins, Harriet Drummond, Ivy Spohnholz, Justin Parish, Geran Tarr and Andy Josephson, all Democrats.

Democrats face an uphill climb, as they’ll have to have two-thirds of the House and Senate approve the proposed constitutional amendment. Then it would go to the voters. 

But the mood of the Republican-led Senate is to not create a constitutionally protected payment until there’s a solid fiscal plan for the state.

The Senate majority has so-far declined to advance a bill by Sen. Bill Wielechowski, an Anchorage Democrat. Wielechowski has asked the Senate to bypass the Senate Judiciary Committee, which is holding his PFD Constitution bill. 

The Permanent Fund is currently in statute, and is not constitutionally guaranteed. The constitutional language dating from 1976 that established the Permanent Fund calls for all realized cash earnings to be deposited in the state’s General Fund.  Later, in the early 1980s, the Alaska Legislature created the dividend program in statute.

Now, for the first time, the Walker Administration is also thinking about the idea of putting the PFD in the Constitution. Lt. Gov. Byron Mallott signaled that the Administration is open to discussing it during an interview on APRN’s Talk of Alaska on March 2:

“The Dividend absolutely needs to be a key aspect of the Alaska economy into the future. And that was the reason that the governor made his veto. It was to protect the dividend going forward and to remove it hopefully from legislative table such that they would then act to protect the dividend. And whether or not it should be placed into the constitution is a valid policy debate — very much so,” Mallott told the host of Talk of Alaska.

The Alaska Republican Party State Convention delegates debated a similar measure over the weekend, but in a close vote ultimately rejected adding it to the party platform.

It may turn out that the most vigorous policy debate centers not on whether the dividend should be constitutionally protected, but rather, at what level?

Should it be set near Gov. Bill Walker’s politically set level of approximately $1,200, or should the formula the legislature adopted in the early 1980s be retained?

The so-called “original formula” would yield dividends for Alaskans above $2,500 initially.

The language of HJR 23 would have 33 percent of the income of the fund available for distribution as dividends to residents, as provided by law. The remaining income would be deposited in the general fund and the distribution of dividends would bypass the legislative appropriation or gubernatorial veto process.

Gov. Walker famously vetoed the dividend in 2016, and the Legislature did not fully fund it in 2017. The amount that would be guaranteed by the Alaska Constitution would be not less than $1,250 each year.

HJR 23 contains a provision to recalculate how money is used from the Permanent Fund Earnings Reserve Account, and adds a “Percent of Market Value” provision that would tap the fund in the same way and at a level similar to that of other large foundations such as large university endowments and sovereign wealth funds.

Parnell: Alaska needs to bring jobs back

In remarks to a banquet hall filled with Alaska Republican delegates and guests, former Gov. Sean Parnell delivered a strong message on Friday night: Alaska needs to bring jobs back. Here’s an excerpt from some of his keynote address:

Before I address Alaska’s economic challenges, let me answer another question. Why am I speaking now, when I’ve been mostly silent for the past three years on state policy issues?

[Parnell then told the story of how he and Sandy were at a meeting with President George W. Bush and heard him describe why he refrained from criticizing his successor for a time, out of respect for the will of the people and respect for the office.]

We both thought George Bush was a class act in the years following his departure from office, and Sandy and I both told each other after hearing him, that when our turn came to leave office, that we were going to follow his example, for the same reasons—out of respect for the voter’s choice and out of a desire to give the new administration a chance to succeed.

Now that they’ve had a chance to succeed, and need a help out … the time has come for me to re-enter the public discussion, as an Alaskan, and as an American, because staying silent is not an option where Alaska is so far off-track.

I say, let’s fix Alaska.

Number one on that fix it list — Let’s bring back our jobs.

In the last three years, about 11,000 jobs have gone away. Driven by our economic losses, job losses, GDP losses, and our shrinking population, Alaska came in dead last in a new ranking of state economic stability by U.S. News & World Report and McKinsey & Company. Both U.S. News and 24/7 Wall Street listed Alaska at 50th–out of 50 states for crime and public safety.

Thousands of jobs were lost first in the oil industry, and it took some time for the job losses to spread, but spread they did. Alaskans and companies began leaving the state.

We’ve said good bye to many stores—both large and small. In the oil patch, Apache’s, gone. Pioneer, gone, Shell, gone. StatOil, gone. In the Mat-Su Valley, we have seen the mom and pop businesses under strain, pulling up stakes and leaving.

In 2014, after leaving office, I had 20 years of commercial law experience in my past, and I still work in that area–representing buyers and sellers of businesses. I see the erosion of Alaska’s economy every day in the stories of my clients. It’s a tough time to be in business in Alaska.

But it does not have to be this way.

Alaska’s economic wounds have been self-inflicted and can be undone.

Let’s start with the oil industry and the governor’s decision not to pay tax credits that were earned.

Let’s say you and your spouse saved some money and you want to earn some interest on it.  You decide that one particular bank offers the best rate of interest on your savings, so you go into the bank, sign a contract, open an account, and deposit your money. A year later, you go back to the bank to collect your money plus interest, but here’s the thing. The bank says you can’t have it. Neither your original deposit nor any interest.

That’s what happened to the small oil explorers.  They sank, in some cases, $150 million or more into their first exploration wells, thinking that they would get the tax credit payments back—because that’s what Alaska law said.  When they didn’t, some went into bankruptcy and some postponed further exploration, killing off thousands of Alaska jobs across the last three years of missed exploration seasons, because they didn’t have the money to go forward.

So, you say, what’s the big deal?

Well, let me ask it this way…in my story, the next time you have some money you want to earn interest on, are you going to park it in the same bank—the one that didn’t pay back your money or the interest you had earned on your initial deposit.

Alaska has, in the last three years, earned a deservedly bad reputation among job creators.  People and companies with money are unwilling to make significant investments in Alaska due to the risk and uncertainty.

Other states work hard to get new business. Our state punishes business—we’ve become more like California in this sense.

The administration’s motto seems to be, “We love jobs, but we hate business.” The truth is, Alaska needs more businesses, large and small, because we need the opportunities and jobs they create.

These herky-jerky policies have eroded the ecosystem creating Alaskan jobs—and Alaskans are worse off today because of it.

Policy matters to jobs.

Stability matters to jobs.

And, credibility matters to jobs.

The good news is that we’ve faced similar challenges in the past, and we have overcome them. We have the resources and the people—many in this room—to bring back the jobs we’ve lost and rebuild our economy. We understand that a healthy economy matters to Alaskans’ future.

So, what are our guiding principles to foster a healthy economy?  How do we bring back Alaskan jobs?

  1. First, we bring Alaskan jobs back by restoring stability. Put the state’s budget on a firmer foundation, get spending under control; and, when you use the earnings reserve, make sure there are side boards and dividends. Measure every state fiscal policy change by whether it replaces uncertainty with stability.  Stability’s byproduct is opportunity for Alaskans.
  2. Second, bring Alaskan jobs back by restoring the state’s credibility. Don’t pay the tax credits in part; pay off the state’s debt in full. Don’t let the state be the debtor that didn’t make good on what it owes. Choose to restore the state’s credibility.
  3. Third, bring our jobs back by telling the world that Alaska is once again open for business—and implement policy to prove it; Because we want a future here for our children and grandchildren, we know who we are fighting for…and we know why. Policies that bring Alaskan jobs back, keep our children meaningfully employed here, and, they keep our families close. More Alaska jobs get created when we have a competitive investment climate, rather than a punitive one. More Alaska jobs get created when we reduce the cost of doing business. [State and local government property taxes have gone up on certain properties by 133% in one case I know of, 160% in another—the notices just came out.] Bring our jobs back by competing well.
  1. Fourth, we bring Alaskan jobs back by fostering entrepreneurialism and welcoming start-ups. We support a friendly environment for job creation among start ups by repairing infrastructure, by incentivizing the build-out of tech solutions, by streamlining government tax and fee collections and by addressing the high cost of health care and health insurance.

The next governor and this legislature need to be laser-focused on growing Alaskan opportunity by bringing back Alaskan jobs. Every policy must be measured by whether it will create Alaskan job opportunity or destroy it. If a proposed policy before legislators even leans in the direction of job destruction, even one scintilla—stop it!

That’s my message: Restore stability; restore our credibility; and, fix Alaska by bringing our jobs back!

So how can you help? What’s your part in all this!

  1. Our greatest need…we need good candidates in the state house and senate races. If you have ever thought that one day you might serve, then I’d ask you to consider that this could be the hour. [I’m willing to talk with you, to counsel you, to tell you what to expect.]
  2. Attend public forums and ask every candidate what they will do to create jobs and keep us safe. Do not cede those two issues. We have the high ground and the right policy answers to get our economy on track and to keep us safe.
  3. Volunteer on campaigns – in our first campaign for the State House, when I was 29 years old, it was my House District 17 Republicans and the Republican women who were vital to our victory – a victory that ultimately led to four years in the State House, four in the State Senate and ultimately to Lt. Governor and Governor.

You, here, have the ability to fix Alaska, and to bring our jobs back.  Together, we will do that!

(Excerpt from a speech delivered by former Alaska Gov. Sean Parnell on March 9, 2018, to delegates and guests at the Alaska Republican Party Convention in Anchorage, Alaska.)

Legislative: No regs in place for catch-and-release tool

2

The pretrial risk assessment evaluation being used by the Department of Corrections to let prisoners walk free while awaiting trial has no regulatory framework to support it.

A memo from Legislative Research Services says that the Walker Administration has not adopted required regulations to govern the new pre-trial assessment tools, and will probably not adopt them until December, 2018, a year after the tools have been in effect.

According to the memo, “regulations would be in place one year following the start of the program to work out issues, make adjustment, and validate the program and tools being used for Pretrial Services.”

The pretrial tools being used by the Department of Corrections have become known as “catch-and-release,” as violent and repeat offenders are being released immediately by judges who say their hands are now tied.

The lenient arm of the law: More ‘catch-and-reoffend’ car thievery

In the case of repeat offenders Shane Muse, 28, and Crystal Tui, 25, who were nabbed in Anchorage earlier this month for yet another car theft, the new bail system qualified them for release, although as of this writing they are both housed in prison — Muse had also been on the lam for a prior forgery case where he skipped his court date. He is housed at the Anchorage jail, while Tui is at Hiland Mountain Correctional Center.

BACKGROUND

In 2016, Alaska enacted SB 91, a comprehensive criminal reform bill, which, among other things, adopted “evidence-based pretrial reforms” and created a pretrial services program (AS 33.07).

A key part of SB 91 is a new pre-trial unit called the Pretrial Enforcement Division in the Department of Corrections. The Division required an additional 40 state workers and supervises defendants placed in the community while waiting for a resolution of the charges against them.

Pretrial officers perform a risk assessment for each defendant who is arrested and booked in jail. Known as the “Alaska 2 Scale” or “”AK-2S,” the new pre-trial system became effective on Jan, 1, 2018.

In the Muse and Tui case, Muse scored a 2 on a scale of 1-10, and Tui scored 0, meaning she is no risk for reoffending.

RISK ASSESSMENT TOOL IS BEING BETA TESTED

But if Legislative Research is correct, then the pre-trial scoring system being used today isn’t based on solid evidence; the risk profile tool is essentially undergoing testing this year on real offenders.

“The DOC has not adopted any regulations for the pretrial program at this time,” wrote Susan Haymes, manager of the Legislative Research Services.

The Correction Department said in the fiscal note on SB 91 that the regulations would be in effect by Dec. 31, 2017.

Gov. Bill Walker is asking for further changes to SB 91, jumping over the regulatory process to fix aspects of the assessment tool that are letting dangerous felons back out on the street.

Under SB 91, the AK-2S tool doesn’t take into account a person’s out-of-state criminal history.

HB 295 would give the court flexibility to consider that criminal history for some of those being arrested.

A memo from Attorney General Jahna Lindemuth has asked the House and Senate Judiciary Committees to hasten hearings on HB 295. Neither has held a hearing on the bill.

[Read the full text of HB 295 here]

Criminal round up, release, repeat

In the story linked above, Shannon Perkins is still out on community supervision, and yet another of the suspects has been released, bringing the total to six out of eight who are not in jail.

Senator Sullivan: Alaskans making big impact in DC

Sen. Dan Sullivan drew on a well of good will and optimism before a crowd of 350 at the Alaska Republican Party’s State Convention in Anchorage on Saturday, where he was the keynote speaker along with Congressman Don Young.

Sullivan’s message reflected the mood of the delegates who greeted him warmly at the Anchorage Hilton ballroom: He spoke of optimism, and opportunity, which has been a running theme during his travels across Alaska lately.

A LOT IS GOING RIGHT

Alaska’s senator, now in his fourth year, pointed out that with the Trump Administration in the White House, and with Republicans in control of the House and Senate, there has been a positive shift in the fortunes of the 49th state.

Alaskans have every reason to be optimistic, and have already been beneficiaries of the sea change that took place in 2016, he said.

Where the Obama Administration did everything in its powers to lock up Alaska’s economy, the Trump Administration and the Republican Congress have undone much of the damage, including rolling back an 11th hour executive order that put all fish and wildlife management in the refuges of Alaska under federal control. Using the Congressional Review Act, the Alaska delegation was able to muster the 51 votes needed to rescind that order.

He spoke about how the military readiness is being restored after the Department of Defense lost 25 percent of its budget between 2010 and 2016 under the Obama Administration.

“You saw how we had a dramatic decline in readiness in terms of our military forces. Alaska is destined to play a critical role in the front line of freedom,” he said.

OPENING THE 1002 AREA DUE TO SCRAPPY ALASKANS

Sullivan brought several rounds of applause, mentioning victories such as the progress made o the King Cove Road and opening the 1002 area of the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge (ANWR).

“The national media hated this issue and they did not want us to get it done,” he said. “They said it was all hidden. It wasn’t hidden. There were a lot of votes, 12 total ANWR votes,” Sullivan said.

“There was also this false narrative that this was Big Energy, Big Oil spending all this money to get ANWR open. Big Energy, Big Oil didn’t really lay a finger on it. The big money was the radical extreme interest groups that were spending millions to try to stop us.

“It was grassroots Alaskans, scrappy Alaskans, three members of the congressional delegation, and all of you….That was it! The millions, the media, and even the government of Canada — our friends — actively lobbying members of Congress and the Senate to not open ANWR. So don’t believe the narrative.”

Sullivan also recalled Washington Democrat Sen. Maria Cantwell’s numerous speeches on ANWR that “drip with this attitude that ‘Alaska — you don’t know what’s good for you and for your future and your economy.’ So when I heard that during the battle we had two Democrats in our state hosting a fundraiser for her — in our state — I didn’t think charitable thoughts.”

REXFORD — AN ALASKAN WHO MADE AN UNFORGETTABLE IMPRESSION

Matthew Rexford testifies in front of the Senate Natural Resources Committee, with Gov. Walker looking on from the left, and a former Obama official and former member of the Knowles Administration on the right.

Sullivan recalled the story of Matthew Rexford of Kaktovik, who came to Washington, D.C. to testify on opening ANWR. He spoke in front of Sen. Lisa Murkowski’s Natural Resources Committee.

“He is a strong young Alaska Native man. It was the first time he had been in front of Congress. I’m sure it was very intimidating. But Matthew told the senators in front of him, both Republican and Democrat, that he and his people refused to be ‘conservation refugees.’

“He said, “We do not approve of efforts to turn our homeland in to one giant national park, which literally guarantees us a fate with no economy, no jobs, and no hope.

“Matthew looked those Senators in the eye and told them because of responsible oil and gas development, his village and villages across the area were able to claw their way out of third-world conditions.

“He talked about how they have the right to continue to use their resources, on their lands, to create jobs, for schools, for hospitals, for the things that most Americans have in abundance and take for granted.”

Sullivan also noted how many Alaskans are now in positions of influence in Washington, singling out Joe Balash, who is now Assistant Secretary of Interior.

Just the mention of Balash’s name always gets a round of applause, Sullivan noted, and Saturday’s naming of him was no different, as man people know Balash as the former commissioner of the Department of Natural Resources in the Parnell Administration and then Sen. Sullivan’s first chief of staff.

Balash now reports to Sec. Ryan Zinke at Interior and its well known in political circles that his rise is a particular irritant to Gov. Bill Walker, as Balash is in charge of the Bureau of Land Management, the Bureau of Ocean Energy Management and other areas that impact Alaska.

Sullivan ended his remarks with a quote from President Theodore Roosevelt, about the importance of being involved in the worthy struggle to make the world a better place:

“It is not the critic who counts; not the man [or woman] who points out how the strong man stumbles, or where the doer of deeds could have done them better. The credit belongs to the man who is actually in the arena, whose face is marred by dust and sweat and blood; who strives valiantly; who errs, who comes short again and again, because there is no effort without error and shortcoming; but who does actually strive to do the deeds; who knows great enthusiasms, the great devotions; who spends himself in a worthy cause; who at the best knows in the end the triumph of high achievement, and who at the worst, if he fails, at least fails while daring greatly, so that his place shall never be with those cold and timid souls who neither know victory nor defeat.”

Republican ‘sense of the convention’ voting results for governor

5

Nearly 300 people in the Alaska Republican Party State Convention voted today whether to recommend candidates for governor and lieutenant governor to the 2018 Republican Primary.

The vote was not binding, but came after delegates heard stump speeches and presentations from the candidates. Delegates from across the state had a chance to meet the candidates personally over the course of three days. Then, they were offered the opportunity to vote one at a time whether to recommend candidates; they could recommend all or none, or recommend some and not others.

They needed to achieve 35 percent approval or higher to be considered a “recommended” candidate.

The results were:

GOVERNOR

Mike Dunleavy

76.9 percent YES

23.1 percent NO

Scott Hawkins

76.4 percent YES

23.5 percent NO

Mike Chenault

42 percent YES

57 percent NO

Michael Sheldon

27 percent YES 

72 percent NO


LIEUTENANT GOVERNOR

 

 

Kevin Meyer

78 percent YES

21 percent NO

Lynn Gattis

69 percent YES

30 percent NO

Edie Grunwald

59 percent YES

40 percent NO

Stephen Wright

22.5 percent YES

77. 5 percent NO

The illogic of cultural appropriation

3

By WIN GRUENING
SENIOR CONTRIBUTOR

Melting pot: a place where a variety of races and cultures assimilate into a cohesive whole that often results in invigoration or novelty – Merriam-Webster Dictionary

The bulk of my life experience has been centered around two highly regulated and regimented careers – the military and the banking industry.  It goes without saying that neither tolerated much diversity of opinion or creative flair.

For that, we have the arts.

That is, until some in the arts community decided artists had to ask permission to be creative, take risks and be provocative.

I’m, of course, referring to the recent dust-up involving the Wearable Art Show sponsored by the Juneau Arts and Humanities Council (JAHC).  Titled a “Spectacular Celebration of Creativity”, artists were encouraged to “explore, experiment, and showcase.”

Despite this glowing promise, one entry this year caused considerable controversy and was ultimately removed from the show.  The entry, by artist Beth Bolander, “Doragon,” was heavily influenced by Asian artwork and fashion. The piece included a silk kimono-like garment with a dragon-inspired theme and facial makeup reminiscent of a geisha.

When Dani Gross (who has Alaska Native ancestry) modeled Bolander’s creation, it was roundly cheered and won third-place.  Yet, some said it promoted Asian stereotypes.  This sparked a heated debate about cultural appropriation that led to its removal and several apologies by the JAHC Board.

Additionally, JAHC promised to hold meetings about cultural appropriation, implement policies for next year’s Wearable Art Show, and provide “equity” training for staff and board members.

Fordham law professor Susan Scafidi defines cultural appropriation as “taking intellectual property, traditional knowledge, cultural expressions or artifacts from someone else’s culture without permission including…… dance, dress, music, language, folklore, cuisine, traditional medicine, religious symbols, etc.”  (Neither Bolander nor Gross are of Asian descent.)

The issues involved generated a firestorm of criticism of JAHC from all sides – from those believing “Doragon” was not only insensitive but racist – to those believing JAHC’s response was caving to “political correctness” and was an example of reverse racism.

As the apparent arbiter of all things cultural, JAHC should have realized what a slippery slope this can be.

While waiting to learn what the limits of free expression will be in our community, here are a few questions the JAHC Board could consider before diving headlong into this quagmire.

  • Will there be separate committees monitoring every featured art form?  Who will give permission from the appropriate culture, if needed?
  • Will these new policies apply to artwork, jewelry and merchandise sold by the JAHC?  What about food served at events?
  • Will information be requested on the ethnicity of artists?  How will that information be verified?

I don’t dispute there are instances of artistic insensitivity (intentional or not) that mock, marginalize, or exploit other races and cultures. Those are never okay.  But that isn’t the intent of “Doragon” – which celebrated the beauty and artistry of Asian culture.

Most art organizations, in the name of artistic expression, have had no problem defending other “offensive” works of art such as “Immersion (Piss Christ)” that depicts the crucifixion of Christ submerged in a small glass tank of the artist’s urine.  Despite the controversy it generated, it was a National Endowment of the Arts-sponsored award winner.

It’s illogical that any arts organization advocating freedom of expression would yield to the tyranny of the cultural-appropriation crowd.

Creative collaborations, and yes, cultural appropriation, can enrich our lives.  Conversely, guarding cultures to preserve them stifles creativity and prevents the free exchange of ideas, styles, and traditions – which should be the hallmark of any multicultural society.

In a larger context, our culture of freedom is slowly being erased by increasingly militant groups: oversensitive critics offended by anyone coloring outside the lines, speaking their mind or straying across some arbitrary boundary of political correctness.

Juneau, like many communities across our state, is a true melting pot.  Only 50% of children in our schools are Caucasian – with the other half mostly Alaska Native, Asian, Hispanic, or an ethnic mixture.

Why deny anyone the full richness of sharing of cultures by telling them they “can see but not touch”?  For over 200 years, this has never been the inspiration that brought people to America.

Juneau can do better.

Win Gruening was born and raised in Juneau and retired as the senior vice president in charge of business banking for Key Bank in 2012. He is active in civic affairs at the local, state, and national level.