Friday, May 8, 2026
Home Blog Page 1626

Alaska a ‘top pick up’ for Republican Governors Association

The Republican Governors Association will buy advertising air time for the six weeks leading up to the November general election. It could spend up to $1.5 million on the ads for whomever the Republican nominee is.

So far, the major candidates include former Sen. Mike Dunleavy, business entrepreneur Scott Hawkins, and Rep. Mike Chenault. Michael Sheldon of Petersburg is also running.

They face an incumbent who doesn’t officially run under any party banner and who now has two gubernatorial runs under his belt — one as a Republican, which failed, and one as an undeclared candidate running with the support of the Alaska Democratic Party. That campaign allowed Gov. Bill Walker to win against incumbent Republican Gov. Sean Parnell in 2014.

The Republican Governors Association clearly wants the seat back. The RGA spent $1.4 million helping Parnell in 2015, by donating to the political action committee that opposed Walker.

The total number of voters in Alaska is 531,819, up from a year ago, when 516,119 were registered with the Division of Elections. The automatic registration of people filing for their Permanent Fund dividends could be driving the numbers higher, even though the state’s population is dropping.

Of those registered, Republicans are now 139,357 strong, while Democrats claim 74,869 voters and undeclared or nonpartisan voters number 289,888, up from 272,397 a year ago. People appear to be registered as Us or Ns more now than in the past, a quick analysis of the records show.

Those U and N voters, along with the other minor parties in Alaska, will be highly sought after by the major campaigns and political parties. Meanwhile, Walker may be forced by the Democrats to run in their primary now that they have won an important case at the Alaska Supreme Court.

The General Election is Nov. 6.

 

 

First the restrooms, now the prayer room

19

INDECENT EXPOSER PROWLING WOMEN

A video and photo circulating on Facebook capture the image of a man in the Fifth Avenue Mall downtown on Sunday, who appears to be peering over the stall into the next stall in the women’s restroom. In the video, the man then exits the restroom

Anchorage Police are asking for anyone who has information about this man and the incident to contact police on the non-emergency dispatch number 3-1-1, option 1. The case number is 18-14195.

Earlier Sunday, police were contacted by a woman who reported that while praying at Holy Family Cathedral, she could sense someone had walked up behind her in the small prayer room. She smelled a foul odor and turned around to see a man standing with his pants and underwear pulled down below his knees, genitals exposed.

“The victim stated the suspect also had some type of object in his right hand that she believed may have been a weapon although she could not specifically identify what it was. The victim fled; she and the suspect did not make physical contact,” the report from Anchorage Police Department said. The man was described as black male in his early 30s, approximately 5’7” tall, and possibly homeless.

The photo released by the police has at least some resemblance to the man photographed in the women’s bathroom in the mall, which is just a few blocks away. The hat, shirt, vest, jacket, pants, and shoes are all similar to the video shown here.

Although the incident in the church may be a crime of indecent exposure, there is no evidence that anything can be done about the man in the women’s restroom.

With Prop. 1 passing with voters during the recent municipal election, men are entitled to enter women’s restrooms in Anchorage and may not be confronted without causing a possible civil rights lawsuit against the complainant. It’s unlikely that the city can prove the man was doing anything wrong — although the woman who recorded him said he was masturbating while watching a woman use the toilet.

Bail or jail? Help legislators grow a spine on crime

An excerpt from the Must Read Alaska Monday Newsletter (subscribe on the right side of the page. It’s free):

Must Read Alaska readers make a difference. Last week we learned that over 400 readers weighed in with the Alaska Parole Board and helped ensure that murderer Cordell Boyd stayed behind bars.

Today, we tackle of one of the most troubling aspects of SB 91 — the controversial criminal justice reform bill signed into law by Gov. Bill Walker in 2016.

Your help is needed to move an important set of fixes.

This is not wholesale reform of SB 91, but takes care of a disastrous loophole.

SB 150 and HB 295 strengthen the pretrial process, giving judges back some of the discretion they had in determining if a suspect should be held or released, and under what conditions.

The current process doesn’t even take into account a criminal’s out-of-state arrest record, something these bills seek to remedy. Alaska has gang members arriving from other states, committing serious crimes here, and getting released quickly because they have no prior Alaska arrest records. Yes, 80 percent of the criminals in this category are in Anchorage, but it is spreading across the state.

THE PROBLEM: THE CATCH-AND-RELEASE CLUB

SB 91 changed how courts set bail and release conditions, creating a “Catch-and-Release Club.”

Since Jan. 1, release decisions have been based on “risk level,” as determined by a pretrial services officer and an off-the-shelf risk assessment tool that the Department of Corrections must have found at the Dollar Store.

The officer’s bail and release decision limits judges’ discretion in setting bail amounts in some cases. Many career criminals are walking free.

THE SOLUTION

SB 150 restores judges’ flexibility in considering a person’s out-of-state criminal history for those persons who fall into certain categories of serious crimes, but not for crimes like DUI.

SB 150 and HB 295 must be heardin their respective Judiciary Committees so this law can get signed before the summer crime season is upon us.

SB 150  was introduced by the governor in January and referred to Senate Judiciary. Sen. Coghill is chair of the committee.

HB 295is the same legislation that is dying in Rep. Matt Claman’s Judiciary Committee.

TAKE ACTION TODAY!

Contact [email protected] and [email protected] and ask them to move the bills.

Type the word “Support” in the subject line.

BACKGROUND

This is an anti-crime swat team effort being spearheaded by Rebecca Logan, former candidate for Anchorage mayor, who gathered a group to get Anchorage, Mat-Su, Juneau, Fairbanks, and Kenai the help they need now.

“It’s critical to get this legislation passed and give the judges the discretion they need to make a good decision. If an MS-13 gang member comes before a judge covered with gang tattoos, and he or she has just been arrested for armed robbery, the judge needs to be able to make a decision on whether that person should be out on the street before trial, whether they will show up for their trial.” said Logan, who started “Advocates for Anchorage.”

“This would solve one of the hardest-to-understand parts of this mess. It would allow judges to be judges,” said Randy Ruedrich, who was among the 16 attending the organizational meeting Sunday night.

The group is concerned that although the city has three lobbyists, none has been tasked by Mayor Ethan Berkowitz with working on crime prevention law. It’s time for citizens to advocate for their own safety.

Pick. Click. Give. program sees another drop in charitable donations

3

The Permanent Fund dividend application deadline was March 31.

An early look shows Alaskans are giving less through the Pick. Click. Give. program than they did last year — or in the three years before that.

Just 24,155 Alaskans made pledges totaling $2,533,575 to 634 nonprofits during this year’s filing season, according to the Alaska Community Foundation, which manages the program.

Pick. Click. Give. encourages Alaskans to donate all or some of their annual dividend to nonprofit organizations. The program started 10 years ago.

Percentage-wise, it means for every 100 Alaskans who participated in 2015, only 72 chose to participate this year, a 28 percent drop. It’s also a 24 percent decrease in dollars pledged.

The decline in Pick. Click. Give. participation shows a trend that follows the recession Alaska is experiencing:

  • 2015: 33,421 Alaskans pledged a record $3.3 million to Alaska nonprofits. The dividend was $2,072, paid to 641,561
  • 2016: 29,543 Alaskans pledged $3.1 million for Alaska nonprofits. The dividend was $1,022, paid to 638,178 people.
  • 2017: 26,128 Alaskans pledged $2.7 million to Alaska nonprofits. The dividend was $1,100, paid to 615,590 people.
  • 2018: 24,144 Alaskans pledged $2.5 million to Alaska nonprofits. The dividend may be $1,600 this year, and will likely be paid to about 600,000 Alaskans, if the trends continue as they have since 2015.

The Permanent Fund Division usually knows by the end of April how many people have applied for the dividend. Usually tens of thousands apply who are not eligible for a variety of reasons. For example, in 2017, some 670,706 applied but only 615,590 received dividends, a difference of 8 percent.

The Pick. Click. Give program had expected about 26,000 Alaskans to participate, according to a March 29 press release. It anticipated $2.5 million in donations. While total participants fell short of program forecasts, actual dollars donated came in right on target.

This year’s top pledge recipients include public broadcasting, charities assisting the poor and those in emergency situations, and organizations devoted to animals.

WHAT IS PICK. CLICK. GIVE.?

Pick. Click. Give. is the option given to Alaskans who qualify for a dividend, which is a share of the State’s earnings on its Permanent Fund, which has been built largely through deposits of State oil royalties over the past 40+ years. Participants can choose from a number of prequalified charities with which to share some of their dividends.

Alaskans can still make a pledge or adjust their current pledges until Aug. 31, 2018 at pfd.alaska.gov. Dividend checks are disbursed in October.

 

Jonesville: Rauscher bill finally heard, passed House

It was beginning to look like the House majority would never allow a vote on creating a safer Jonesville. The Jonesville Public Use Area bill — House Bill 6 — was offered more than a year ago by Rep. George Rauscher of Sutton.

But after being parked on the desk of Rules Chair Rep. Gabrielle LeDoux since April, 2017, the legislation to formalize a public use area allowing for recreation, off-roading, hunting, and other uses finally made it to the floor, where it passed unanimously on April 6.

What was once a favorite recreation area near Sutton had started becoming notorious a few a years ago. There were just too many people using the area and some uses were creating conflicts, such as those who were shooting at targets they set up in areas where off-roaders were riding. At times, bullets seemed to fly from everywhere over Slipper Lake, a place where waders and swimmers head on a hot summer day.

Stray bullets sometimes hit homes nearby. And the place was being trashed with … trash.

Rep. George Rauscher

The historic coal mining district, owned and managed by the Alaska Department of Natural Resources, is what prompted Rauscher to get more involved in the political process in his hometown as he and his neighbors looked for a solution.

Creating a formal public area and — importantly — a management plan out of what was becoming a “Mad Max” theater was the best answer. That had worked at Jim Creek, where unstructured target shooting had become a public safety concern until a shooting range was set up on Maud Road. Jim Creek became the model for Jonesville.

Federal funds from mining reclamation will continue to come into the area, where the state can use the funds to make improvements.

LeDoux, who was apparently irritated that Rauscher had beat her friend and collaborator Jim Colver in the 2016 primary, had used Rauscher’s key legislation to punish him for taking out the leader of the Muskox Caucus, the group that had conspired to roll the House Republican leadership and turn the keys over to the Democrats. Rauscher was having no part of making that kind of deal for conservative District 9.

HB 6 has now reached the Senate, where it was read into the record on Friday and referred to Rules. That signals the Senate is likely to put it on a speedy path for a vote.

This weekend, Rauscher was optimistic about the legislation getting passed by the Senate.

“This year, the Legislature is finally addressing the safety needs of the people who use the Jonesville area,” said Rauscher. “It’s always been about safety and families.”

While you tune up your ATV for the coming recreation season, check out this epic rollover in a YouTube video posted by Jukin Media:

Shifting attitudes make Juneau access road inevitable

16

By WIN GRUENING
SENIOR CONTRIBUTOR

The results of a recent poll commissioned by First Things First Alaska Foundation in partnership with the City and Borough of Juneau focused attention once again on our capital city’s transportation priorities.

The McDowell Group study surveyed 402 Juneau residents in January about three community transportation issues – the Juneau Access Project, Alaska Marine Highway service, and the North Douglas Crossing.

Nearly 80 percent of Juneau residents indicated support for a North Douglas Crossing – primarily for access, easing traffic congestion, and improving safety and emergency response.

Questions about ferry service and Juneau Access were more revealing.

Building another ferry terminal farther north on the existing road system to provide more frequent day-boat ferry service was supported by 53 percent of respondents.

Win Gruening

A “gradual transition to day-boat service wherever possible” was supported by two-thirds (68 percent) of residents, while only 19 percent opposed it.

Slightly more than half of respondents (54 percent) support or strongly support the construction of a road along the east side of Lynn Canal to a shuttle ferry terminal at the Katzehin River.  Only 39 percent opposed construction (with slightly less than half of those being strongly opposed).

A quarter of those opposed would be more likely to support the road if it went beyond Katzehin to Skagway.  In other words, if the road was built all the way to Skagway – as I believe will eventually happen – support would increase to over 60 percent.

This project, designated Juneau Access Preferred Alternative 2B, will allow travel between Juneau and Haines via eight daily roundtrip shuttle ferry rides (27 minutes-long and less than $20 for vehicle and driver each way).

This compares to the existing Juneau-Haines service of several weekly ferry trips taking up to 4 hours (not counting 2-hour check-in time) and costing several hundred dollars each way.

Unlike previous unscientific polls and anecdotal reporting, this survey reflects strong support for the Juneau Access Project and increased use of “day-boats” allowing the ferry system to transition to more efficient operations.

Survey results reinforce the pro-road resolution passed 6-3 by the CBJ Assembly in January 2017 after Governor Walker halted the project.

The resolution asked Juneau’s Legislative Delegation to support the previously appropriated funds and asked the Alaska Legislature to maintain funding for the project to allow it to proceed at a later time.

Apparently, some legislators were listening. During a recent budget vote, Rep. Lance Pruitt, R-Anchorage, offered an amendment to restore $21 million of road funding lost last year. All Republicans and Independent Jason Grenn of Anchorage supported the amendment.

Ironically, the motion was defeated 20-19 because both Juneau House members, Sam Kito and Justin Parish, voted against it – completely disregarding the regional importance of this transportation project.

Contrast this out-of-step thinking with the elections of Juneau’s mayor, Ken Koelsch, and state senator, Dennis Egan – unabashed supporters of Juneau Access who won their races by huge margins.

Declining ridership, ballooning subsidies, schedule reductions and higher fares now define our ferry system.   Ferry breakdowns and stranded passengers continue to make headlines.

Since the need for improved transportation options in Southeast Alaska is undeniable, it’s hard to understand continued resistance to a project that increases vehicle capacity and frequency of service; lowers costs to travelers and the state; and provides economic benefits to Juneau and neighboring communities.

Shortening routes by building roads wherever possible will increase ferry system flexibility and mitigate its burdensome financial difficulties.

CBJ Finance Director, Bob Bartholomew, recently noted that our community has “…lost 800 residents, 500 jobs, and total gross wages are flat,” making the economic benefits of the road even more necessary.

Despite the short-sighted actions of the current governor and Juneau’s own House members, the Lynn Canal Highway remains a viable project that will be restarted when the stars are realigned.

Opponents can cite exaggerated environmental, safety, and cost objections ad nauseum, but most Juneau residents and many in the Legislature prefer real progress to a status quo that exacerbates the economic and demographic challenges facing our region.

Eventually, as this project moves forward – and it will – access to and from the Capital City will be meaningfully improved for all Alaskans.

Win Gruening was born and raised in Juneau and retired as the senior vice president in charge of business banking for Key Bank in 2012. He is active in civic affairs at the local, state, and national level.

 

 

Crime bill pressure hits boiling point in Senate Judiciary

9

HOW SEN. COSTELLO WON A BATTLE BUT…

The men and women of the Alaska Legislature are feeling the heat on crime, but some are feeling it more than others.

Anchorage, Mat-Su, Juneau, and parts of Kenai are experiencing an unprecedented crime wave, while Fairbanks has not been as affected.

Thus, it’s no surprise that the author of the major crime reform bill, Sen. John Coghill of Fairbanks, wants to keep SB 91 in statute and continue to refine it as needed. SB 91 was a sweeping criminal justice reform bill that was signed by Gov. Bill Walker in 2016.

And it’s equally no surprise that Sen. Mia Costello of Anchorage (Sand Lake, Jewel Lake), wants a wholesale repeal of the law that is seen by many in her district as the reasons criminals are running amok in Anchorage.

Costello is going into an election season and expects that her constituents will hold her accountable for her original vote, which was in favor of SB 91. Hitting the reset button on crime legislation is a way of reassuring her base that she gets the message and wishes to make the needed changes.

So when Coghill, who chairs the Judiciary Committee, dragged his feet on Costello’s repeal bill and didn’t schedule hearings, Costello formed an alliance with Sen. Mike Shower of Wasilla and Sen. Bill Wielechowski, a Democrat representing East Anchorage. They forced the issue.

Wait…what? Two Republicans joined in with the arch Democrat of the Senate to roll the committee chairman?

That’s what it came down to this week.

Costello and Shower signed a letter with Wielechowski to move the repeal bill to a hearing. Senate rules say that with three signatures from committee members, a chairman must either put a bill up for a hearing or it will get bounced to the next committee or to the Senate floor.

Part of getting the three names needed on the letter required giving Wielechowski something he wants: A hearing on his resolution —  SJR 1 — to put the Permanent Fund dividend in the State Constitution. The third item in the letter pertains to teen dating violence. The law is informally known as Bree’s Law, but the bill would name it that officially.

The unlikely alliance of a moderate Republican (Costello), a conservative Republican (Shower) and a radically left Democrat determined to torpedo the Republican majority has raised more than a few eyebrows, however. Any deal with Wielechowski is likely to be of concern to most GOP politicos, because his ultimate goal is not limited to a higher Permanent Fund dividend, but also enacting a broad-based tax on working Alaskans and higher oil taxes on producers.

Every chance he gets, Wielechowski will try to harm the Senate majority.

For example, today after the Judiciary Committee met, Wielechowski issued a press release stating that Chairman Coghill had refused to take public testimony on the three bills, when Coghill had made it clear at the beginning of the hearing and again at the end that the nature of the first hearing on the bills was to hear them and allow committee members to ask questions and offer amendments.

Public hearings are never held on the first reading of a bill. That comes on the second and subsequent hearings.

And yet, Wielechowski had spun it as though no testimony was ever going to be taken and said in a statement that he would move to bounce the bill to the Senate floor.

Doing so would actually ensure that no public testimony is heard, but this is how the union lawyer works: Sowing confusion and anger is part of the Wielechowski plan, and he has executed it.

COULD SHE LOSE THE WAR?

For his part, Coghill won his reelection in 2016 with over 53 percent of the vote, even after sponsoring SB 91, which has proved to be a hazard to any politician’s future election.

Like Wielechowski and Costello, Coghill is a veteran of the political process and will now need to find a way to forgive Costello for rolling him as a chairman and undermining trust between caucus colleagues.

(Overlooking Wielechowski’s hijinks is something Coghill is much more accustomed to doing.)

What will happen to Costello, who has been a rising star and one of the original sponsors of SB 91? Is she alienating the majority caucus in order to force her bill to the floor or are there other goals, as some in the capitol building have speculated?

Probably not. It is quite likely that we are simply witnessing some late-session, election-year drama around a very critical subject matter near and dear to voters’ hearts: the crime wave.

The political stakes are high. as the disagreements in the Senate Republican caucus on this issue are deep. So it may not be pretty. Stay tuned.

[Watch the Senate Judiciary Committee hearings today and decide for yourself.]

Propositions drove voters more than mayoral race

2

WELL-HEELED ACLU SPENT $25 PER ‘NO’ VOTE ON BATHROOM BILL

More Anchorage voters marked yes or no on “the bathroom bill” question than for all of the candidates for mayor during the municipal election that ended Tuesday.

With just 1,000 ballots remaining to be counted, Prop. 1 didn’t pass muster with 40,378 voters (52.7 percent), compared to the 36,234 (47.3 percent) who favored restoring bathrooms and locker rooms to respective male and female gender norms.

More than $1 million was spent by the ACLU-Fair Anchorage group to convince voters that public bathroom and dressing facilities need to be gender-neutral. That means they spent $25 per vote against the question.

Some 1,754 more votes were cast on that question than were cast in the mayor’s race.

Candidates for mayor attracted 74,858 votes, with incumbent Mayor Ethan Berkowitz taking 55.1 percent of the vote to Rebecca Logan’s 37.1 percent. Seven other candidate split the remainder. If they had not been on the ballot, Logan likely would have received 32,972 votes, but still lost.

The ACLU-Fair Anchorage effort, supported by Planned Parenthood and national LGBT organizations, contributed to the comparatively solid turnout with their voter ID and massive get-out-the-vote operations.

[Read: Man exposes himself to child in Target store in Chicago]

Ballots were mailed to voters on March 13 and, after a first rush of ballots, the numbers received dropped off until the last four days, when 40 percent of the ballots flooded into the city’s Ship Creek election office.

A few hundred more people also voted on the other propositions than voted for mayor.

Prop. 10, the sale of the city’s utility to Chugach Electric Association, received 74,885, and the question passed comfortably by 65.2 percent.

Prop. 11, to give greater property tax exemptions, passed with 72.5 percent of the vote with 75,124 total votes cast, again slightly more than those voting in the mayor’s race.

BLUE WAVE? 

There was no wave of Democrats voting, even though some of the results of the election went decidedly liberal, with all bond measures passing and a leftist mayor re-elected.

Of three liberal candidates running for school board, only one was elected: Deena Mitchell. The others, Alisha Hilde and Elisa Snelling, are more conservative.

That indicates there was no block voting occurring. People who were motivated to vote on Prop. 1 did not necessarily vote for liberal school board candidate Tasha Hotch, for instance, even though she ran joint campaign ads with Deena Mitchell, who captured 70 percent of the vote.

And since both of the leading candidates for mayor came out in opposition to Prop. 1, it was not a campaign issue for either of them.

FRAUD? HARD TO SAY

No evidence has emerged of widespread voter fraud, although one voter that Must Read Alaska spoke with had someone fill out her ballot at her request and sign it because she was out of town and unable to meet the deadline. That ballot and signature were accepted by the election office, even though the signatures did not match what was presumably on file. It’s impossible to know how many such ballots were accepted.

MAILED BALLOTS

Forty-seven percent of voters (36,295) used the U.S. mail to send their ballots in, which meant they had to provide the first-class stamp. Others used voting assistance centers and strategically placed drop boxes, which were emptied each day by election workers.

VOTING ASSISTANCE CENTERS BY THE NUMBERS

Ballots returned in person to Voting Assistance Centers:

O’Malley Golf Course Voting Assistance Center – 1,461

Eagle River Voting Assistance Center 634

Election Office at Ship Creek – 688

City Hall – 1,737

Loussac Library – 6,784

DROP BOXES BY THE NUMBERS

Ballots dropped into secure drop boxes:

Fairview – 738

Clark Middle School – 830

Bartlett High School – 940

South High School – 2,029

Service High School – 2,396

Dimond High School – 3,122

Eagle River High School – 5,700

Loussac Library – 8,099

Girdwood – 432

UAA Campus – 1,744

Anchorage School District on Boniface/Northern Lights – 3,941

OTHER BALLOTS

Anchorage Pioneer Home – 27 votes cast

Anchorage Senior Center – 36 votes cast

Chugiak Senior Center – 14 votes cast

Number of ballots that came in postmarked too late – approximately 200

Number of ballots with no signature or unverifiable signature – approximately 300 (letters are being sent to those voters)

Number of votes that came in during the last four days – approximately 40 percent.

Number of people voting who had not voted for several years (including newly registered voters): approximately 5,300

 

Government comrades go after oil workers again

COMMENTARY

House Democrats introduced their second job-jacking tax increase of the session, HB 411. 

HB 411 is a complete overhaul of HB 111, which was supposed to put an end to oil tax changes — at least for a while.

This new bill is a $300-700 million hike in taxes being introduced during the last 9 days of session. The end of the voter-mandated 90-day session is supposed to be next Sunday, but House Democrats have already publicly stated they intend to ignore the deadline as they did last year. Introducing fresh and controversial oil tax legislation this late is proof that they mean what they say when it comes to running late and taxing more.

Politicos will recall this wasn’t supposed to happen. An oil tax working group was established upon the passage of HB 111, and Rep. Geran Tarr — a committed tax-and-spend Democrat — is co-chair of it.

Working group members from the House are Reps. Andy Josephson (D-Anchorage), Dean Westlake (D-Kiana, who resigned after being charged with sexual harassment), Jason Grenn (U-Anchorage), and Dave Talerico (R-Healy). Senate members include Sen. Cathy Giessel (R-Anchorage, co-chair), Bert Stedman (R-Sitka), Natasha von Imhof (R-Anchorage), Peter Micciche (R-Soldotna), and Bill Wielechowksi (D-Anchorage).

The working group was designed to evaluate Alaska’s fiscal system for oil and gas under House Bill 111, a bill that reformed Alaska’s tax credit program for oil and gas companies. The bill was signed into law in July of 2017, after passing both the House and Senate.

Shall we just call it a day on that working group since the tax hits just keep coming? Was Tarr’s insistence on the working group just cover for her so she could vote for HB 111, even though she vehemently opposed it?

Must Read Alaska can’t figure out why the bill was not referred to Rep. Tarr and Josephson’s House Resources, but only referred to Finance. Odd.