Wednesday, May 6, 2026
Home Blog Page 1581

Labor Day’s traditions and transitions

0

In which our senior contributor considers the eight-hour day and the three-day weekend that celebrates it, at least for white-collar workers.

By ART CHANCE
SENIOR CONTRIBUTOR

The first Monday in September has been the Labor Day federal holiday since 1894, although many states had a labor day before that.

In labor and leftist circles, activists pushed for a May holiday to commemorate working people, but business interests and the government itself resisted a May labor day because of the association with the Haymarket Riots, in which several police officers and civilians were killed and for which several anarchists/socialists were hanged or imprisoned.

Largely because of the Haymarket Affair, the politically correct way to refer to the riot, May 1 has become Labor Day in many socialist and communist countries.

Since the US Labor Day was designated as the first Monday in September, Labor Day became the first of the three-day weekend holidays, at least for those who got Saturday and Sunday off, a small minority of workers, mostly white collar.

Labor Day weekend over time became the symbolic end of summer and the time to put away your white and seersucker clothing, though that standard has been relaxed in recent years.

Art Chance

Organized labor likes to brag that they’re the people who brought you the weekend; they aren’t.   Even today the only unionized employees who routinely get every Saturday and Sunday off are white collar and professional public employees and in the non-union workforce only professionals and some white collar employees can routinely expect every Saturday and Sunday off.

In the 1890s, the standard for labor and trades workers was a work week of six 10-hour days, Monday through Saturday with Sunday off for those operations that weren’t 24/7.  Most “inside” work, retail, office workers, etc. worked eight- or 10-hour days with either five and a half days or six days in the workweek.

Much of the retail industry and some service companies gave a half day off mid-week, usually Wednesday or Thursday afternoon, and then were closed on Sunday.  Much manufacturing, railroading, mining, the most highly unionized sectors in those days ran 24/7 and workers had irregular days off.

In the late 19thCentury the big push from organized labor and their allies on the Left was for the eight-hour day.  A demonstration in support of the eight-hour day is what led to the police shooting of workers at the McCormick farm machinery plant and a protest over that shooting led to a bombing and the Haymarket Riot.

For those who get a weekend, the traditional Saturday and Sunday, it can be attributed first to custom in the professional and managerial classes and second to the 1938 federal Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA).   While the FLSA didn’t formalize labor’s long-held desire for the eight-hour day, it did set the standard of the 40-hour week at straight time pay and “time and a half” for work over 40 hours in a week and an administrative work period, a work week, of seven consecutive days, usually Sunday through the next Saturday.

This led to five eight-hour days with two days off in the work period becoming the standard, though two consecutive days off even today is far from universal.

The real impetus behind the 40-hour week and overtime pay over 40 hours was to get more people employed. Benefits were a very minor part of payroll costs in the 1930s so putting a 50 percent premium on work over 40 hours was to incentivize employers to have more employees rather than work the employees more hours.

Today when putting out a “Help Wanted” sign is akin to putting out a “Please Sue Me” sign. Benefits and taxes can be well over 40 percent, so employers would often prefer to pay the overtime.

Only Alaska and a couple of other states have daily overtime, though the State of Alaska exempts itself from the State’s Wage and Hour Laws and the daily overtime requirement.

Most of the rest of the Fair Labor Standards Act was aimed at the abysmal working conditions in rural areas and particularly in the South and the racially motivated death spiral of wages in the South. Child labor, at least for those under 14, was outlawed altogether except for family businesses and on farms; most agricultural and small retail labor was exempt from the Fair Labor Standards Act anyway.

Whenever workers complained of working conditions or a union organizer showed up all the Southern employer had to do was threaten to hire black labor. Then the union organizer couldn’t find anyone who’d talk to him and the workers were told they should be happy with the wages and working conditions they had.

The minimum wage was instituted to stop the downward spiral in wages as southern employers would routinely cut wages and threaten to replace white workers with blacks if the white workers objected. The minimum wage had little if any effect on the more industrialized and unionized north and middle West, but had a significant effect on the agricultural areas of the Country, particularly the South.

Even today agricultural and fishing employers go to great lengths to avoid state and federal wage and hour laws, as do other employers in areas where the economy is dominated by agriculture and fishing.

In Alaska if you process fish in a cannery onshore, you’re subject to Alaska’s draconian wage and hour laws.   Move it 12 miles offshore and you’re subject only to federal wage and hour laws, and many of the employees would be considered agricultural employees and exempt from most federal wage and hour laws. Move the processor outside 200 miles and you aren’t subject to any laws at all.

I spent much of my adult life across bargaining tables and in hearing rooms arguing with unions over wages, hours, and terms and conditions of employment. The unions, some of them anyway, like to accuse me of being anti-union, but I’m not anti-union in their role of representing employees in matters of wages, hours, and terms and conditions of employment.

But I am very anti-union when they assume the role of a Socialist workers’ party with the right to compel political contributions.

I grew up in The South and I’ve seen how employers will behave in a friendly legal environment and with a labor surplus. I wouldn’t want to be an hourly worker non-union, even in Alaska.

Today, much of America’s unskilled and semi-skilled workforce would love to have an 8-hour day rather than the 4- or 6- hour day and two jobs that Obamacare has sentenced them to.

This Labor Day is a good time to think about the deteriorating Alaska workforce and working conditions.   Every time Pomp and Circumstance gets played, Alaska gets dumber. Our best and brightest go Outside to college and the only ones who come back for more than a visit are those with a family situation that they can step into. We are graduating kids who are at best semi-literate and who have zero work skills. Throw in the amount of drug use and we’re producing a workforce that lacks fundamental work habits and skills and because of drug use cannot be employed in any safety sensitive job.

Employers willing to put up with the low-quality workforce can hire at the minimum wage and those with some concern for workers compensation costs can pay a dollar or two more and require drug testing.

You cannot live on the minimum wage or even a dollar or two more anywhere in Alaska except in your parents’ house or piled in with a bunch of others similarly situated in an apartment in a bad part of town.   And, no, the answer isn’t to raise the minimum wage.

At this time of celebrating those who labor, we should be concerned that the labor force participation rate in the US was last so low in the early 1970s before large numbers of women began to enter the workforce. I’ve never looked at Alaska-specific workforce participation rates, but it must be abysmal statewide and disastrous in rural Alaska.

And it isn’t going to get any better unless we take steps to produce a more skilled workforce. If you’re an entry level or low/semi-skill worker, only your personal pride causes you to take the jobs that are available to you in the private sector. If you can’t get an entry-level government job, and the competition is intense, you’re better off on welfare than working two or three lousy jobs to try to support yourself.  Frankly, if you go to college and come out with some general studies/liberal arts degree, you’re still a entry level or low/semi-skilled applicant and they’re a dime a dozen, though the degree might give you a little advantage in getting a government job.

There really isn’t much to celebrate about labor in Alaska unless you are a high-skill worker or have a unionized government job.  The unions, particularly the building trades unions that were once the most powerful force in Alaska politics, have all but abandoned doing anything other than protecting their niche. They should be desperately concerned about their diminishing ability to send a qualified employee when one of the few remaining unionized employers calls the hall.

Young people are trying to enter the workforce with no skills and no clue as to what is expected from an employee.  Just as the University of Alaska has to provide remedial courses before Alaska’s high school graduates can even take college level classes, themselves dumbed down already.

Meanwhile, unions that have apprenticeship programs have to teach their apprentices what work is before they can teach them the actual skills of their trade.

Unions need to do something about it, but so far they seem content with the status quo of a poorly educated workforce. And they’re allied with the teachers’ unions in maintaining that status quo.

Art Chance is a retired Director of Labor Relations for the State of Alaska, formerly of Juneau and now living in Anchorage. He is the author of the book, “Red on Blue, Establishing a Republican Governance,” available at Amazon. He only writes for Must Read Alaska when he’s banned from posting on Facebook. Chance coined the phrase “hermaphrodite Administration” to describe a governor who is simultaneously a Republican and a Democrat. This was a grave insult to hermaphrodites, but he has not apologized.

With friends like these…

As bona fide, card-carrying kibitzers in the upcoming November political silliness, we cannot help but wonder what Mark Begich must be feeling about unions right about now. With friends like them, he must be thinking, who needs enemies?

The AFL-CIO has decided it will hang onto its current meal ticket, Republican-cum-independent-cum-undeclared-cum-independent again Gov. Bill Walker in the upcoming general election and kick Begich to the curb. No money. No help. No Love.

Read the editorial at…

http://www.anchoragedailyplanet.com/130842/with-friends-like-them/

McCain was torn down by the same press that savages Trump

2

How quickly we forget.

John McCain, who was presidential material and would have made a good president in 2008, was being victimized by the liberal media exactly 10 years ago this month.

But the news media waved the patriotic flag frenetically this week upon the announcement of the Arizona senator’s passing.

Those who shape the mainstream narrative have made him into a lion beyond reproach, someone who would fight the media bogey-man named Donald Trump until his last breath.

In 2008 the mainstream press rather enjoyed McCain as a primary candidate, at least initially, because the man was sympathetic toward the Democrats’ positions and could never be counted on by his party as a solid Republican. In fact, he seemed to fight his own party as much as he’d battle the opposing one.

But the moment he chose Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin as his running mate, the media turned its fire-breathing dragons on him.

Facts back up this unhappy allegation:

The Pew Research Center found that McCain received four times as many negative stories as positive ones after his nomination.

Barack Obama, on the other hand, was the subject of twice as many laudatory stories as McCain.

Coverage of McCain was lopsidedly unfavorable, and became even more so over time, the research shows, as the nation prepared to vote in the General Election that November.

For Obama during this period, a third of the stories were clearly positive, a third neutral, and 29 percent were mixed.

Conversely, 75 percent of the stories about McCain were negative.

The media does the same savaging day after day to President Trump, and yet he seems to just keep on being himself, and being president.

McCain clearly never liked Donald Trump, and swiped at him at every opportunity; the president swiped back. McCain likely could not understand how the country could elect a man with a bad comb-over and a New York businessman’s brashness, while not allowing a true war hero like himself to lead the country.

Both men were alpha males, both full of themselves, both regarding their own talents as extraordinary.

Trump didn’t take lightly to the insults and said some regrettable things about McCain. The grudge stuck, on both sides, and it never seemed to ease.

Today, the bitterness of the McCain family toward the sitting president spilled over to the ceremonies that featured a eulogy by his daughter, Meghan McCain, which carried the grudge match forward into the next generation, even while she mourned her beloved father:

“We gather here to mourn the passing of American greatness. The real thing, not cheap rhetoric from men who will never come near the sacrifice he gave so willingly,” she said, emotionally.

“The America of John McCain has no need to be made great again, because America was always great.” The crowd roared its approval.

“We live in an era where we knock down old American heroes for all their imperfections when no leader wants to admit to fault or failure. You were an exception and gave us an ideal to strive for.”

No one should speak ill of the dead, but this is the Hatfields and McCoys of the political realm. It was sad to see the family lose their loved one, but it was also sad to see the lack of restraint; instead, the McCains made it about Trump, who went to play golf and tweeted about Canada today. Trump had added to the drama earlier in the week by only lowering the flag over the White House for just a day to mark McCain’s passing. Public pressure finally prevailed and he ordered the flag back to half-staff until the senator is in his final resting place.

The remarks of former President Barack Obama during the memorial service were also pointed criticisms of Donald Trump, and spoke of McCain in ways that were entirely opposite to how he portrayed him in 2008, when he unleashed a series of attack ads that even the New York Times said were false.

At McCain’s apparent request, his former running mate Sarah Palin was disinvited to the memorial services, as were several members of his campaign staff from the 2008 failed presidential run. But the Obamas were there.

Families are entitled to bury their dead in the way they see fit, but this memorial week has devolved into a bit of theater that will make many Republicans glad when it’s all over. For many, McCain was a man they admired for many attributes, who they tolerated for other attributes, and who they wanted to like.

The late Sen. Ted Stevens understood these mixed feelings toward McCain better than most. He and McCain were often at odds on policy issues, especially Alaska spending programs, and their personal rapport was none too warm, either.  It was Sen. McCain who popularized the “bridge to nowhere” description of the proposed Ketchikan bridge and, to the enduring dismay of the entire Alaska delegation, made it a rhetorical centerpiece of his 2008 presidential campaign.

Like Trump, McCain often made liking him a difficult task. His memorial service only scratched the scab on that dichotomy of the patriotic desire to honor the hero, yet wanting the drama between McCain and the president to — for the love of all things holy — be put to rest.

[Watch the memorial service here on CSPAN.]

 

LeDoux extends her lead; will State certify fraudulent election?

3

INVESTIGATION COULD INVOLVE HER ENTIRE STAFF

House Rep. Gabrielle LeDoux, in a reputation crisis over an alleged vote-buying scheme, now has 116 more votes than her primary challenger, Aaron Weaver.

In a matter that has been referred to the Department of Law for investigation of potential fraud in the LeDoux votes, the absentee ballots coming in late last week at the Division of Elections give LeDoux an easy win. Earlier absentees had her up by 87.

It’s a turnaround for the history books: On the first count after the polls closed, she was down by three votes.

LeDoux may have been stunned on election night by her opponent’s strength, but she already knew she had at least 100 absentee votes that had not been counted — those were the votes that a California man named Charlie Chang had acquired for her, and she’d paid him more than $10,000 for his services. These were her “insurance” votes, and now, it appears, many of them were fraudulent, perhaps criminally so.

It’s now been shown that even Chang voted in her district, although there’s little evidence he lives there. Chang is a Democrat operative in Fresno, California, where he serves on the Fresno County Democratic Party committee for Hmong voters.

It’s only one of dozens of irregularities, which include seven instances where dead people requested absentee ballots to vote in District 15.

In the counting of all the absentees, the Division of Elections set aside 26 for further review. There were just too many questions. And although the Department of Law will likely not pursue the matter, due to the Attorney General answering to Gov. Bill Walker first, this has become a federal criminal matter because there were federal candidates on the ballot in the U.S. House race.

That may have caught the attention of the U.S. Department of Justice and FBI, although neither has issued a statement.

It now appears that LeDoux will “win”, but will be busy for months answering the questions of investigators and reporters who will want to know what she knew and when she knew it, whom she directed to get votes and in what manner she directed them.

LeDoux is famous for keeping records on her district and every voter in it, and she has now told the media she has no idea who the voters are or why there are 17 voters registered with their listed address in one small trailer.

But her days of speaking to the media are coming to an end. LeDoux will clam up during an active investigation, and she’ll need to get a lawyer, too.

During an investigation, which would span California and Alaska, state and/or federal investigators would likely subpoena documents from her, Chang, and even her legislative staff who helped her during her campaign. Often legislative staff take official leave to help their bosses get re-elected.

That could sweep into an investigation of her long-time chief of staff, confidante and Juneau roommate Lisa Vaught, who may expect to have her phone records, emails and text messages to and from Rep. LeDoux and Chang scanned into the record. Vaught is handling LeDoux’s reporting to the Alaska Public Offices Commission of campaign income and expenditures.

It could also entangle Courtney Enright, her Rules Committee staff and Greg Smith, her legislative aide. All three of them have been paid by LeDoux to perform campaign work during the past few months.

The investigation could widen from there and sweep in close associates, such as lobbyists who advise her on a regular basis. It could extend as far as her donors.

And if there’s one thing about an investigation that includes the FBI it’s this: You don’t want to be telling agents anything that isn’t absolutely true.

The certification of the Primary Election is set for Tuesday, which is also the last day candidates can drop from the General Election ballot.

Election officials will likely be working through the weekend to prepare for Sept. 4, the day when the field for the General Election ballot will be set and the ballots can be printed.

But questions continue about how many illegitimate ballots were cast in the district.

After extensive reporting by news media, Alaska Republican Party Chairman Tuckerman Babcock wrote to the director of the Division of Elections Josie Bahnke and asked her to delay the certification of District 15 until an investigation is completed.

“They are grappling with pre-meditated corruption and have never faced that challenge before,” Babcock said. The fact that dead people requested absentee ballots is proof that the corruption was planned.

Where is Byron Mallott?” Babcock said, referring to the silent lieutenant governor, whose job it is to oversee elections in Alaska.

Assuming the state moves ahead to certify the District 15 results on Tuesday, this will be the second flawed primary election in two years blessed by the Alaska Division of Elections. The first was the blatantly erroneous House District 40 election in 2016 that ended up ousting Rep. Ben Nageak in favor of the now disgraced Dean Westlake.

Coincidentally or not, both of these tainted races will have been decided in a manner that favors the political fortunes of the Walker-Mallott Administration.

THE GENERAL ELECTION

All of this bodes well for LeDoux’s Democratic opponent, Lyn D. Franks, who won 45 percent of the Democrat ballots cast and now proceeds to the General Election.

The Alaska Democratic Party will likely recalculate its plans for the district and see that seat as a “pick up” for Democrats, leaving LeDoux without any party at all, since the Alaska Republican Party has sanctioned her as unacceptable.

Raising money for LeDoux’s General Election effort will be tough under the current circumstances, with donors unlikely to want to write a check to someone who may ultimately face corruption charges.

The Democrats have pounced already. Franks wasted no time in putting out an invitation for a fundraiser for her campaign, in which she identified LeDoux as “vulnerable,” as shown below:

Sen. Sullivan helping Kavanaugh prepare for Tuesday hearing

DETAILS: HEARINGS WILL BE LIVE ON CSPAN

Sen. Dan Sullivan and a small group of other high-ranking supporters have been working with Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh to ready him for the Senate Judiciary Committee hearings that start on Tuesday.

Exercises like these are known as “murder boards,” or “scrub downs.” Typically in these mock proceedings, attention is paid to every detail, from microphones, to seating arrangements. The person rehearsing is coached and critiqued on everything from attire to how they sip water, to how they answer the questions.

Along with Sullivan, Sen. Orrin Hatch of Utah, Lindsey Graham of South Carolina, and Rob Portman of Ohio have gathered in a room in the Eisenhower Executive Office Building, and conducted mock hearings with Kavanaugh this week. Hatch is a former Judiciary Committee chairman and current member of the committee, and he played the role of committee chairman during the mock exercises.

The four-day hearing starts at 9:30 a.m. on Sept. 4. The 21-member committee has 11 Republicans and 10 Democrats and is chaired by Sen. Chuck Grassley, an Iowa Republican. Sen. Dianne Feinstein of California is the ranking Democrat.

Viewers can watch the live proceedings on CSPAN.org 

Live video may also be seen on the Senate livestream here.

The proceedings take place in the Hart Building, Room 216, with an introduction of Kavanaugh by former Secretary of State Condoleeza Rice, Sen. Rob Portman of Ohio, and Lisa Blatt, a DC attorney, followed by opening statements by each member of the Judiciary Committee, which will take nearly three hours to complete — if each sticks to his and her 10-minute limit.

Kavanaugh will not say much until Wednesday, when he will deliver his own opening statement and begin to answer questions. Senators have 30 minutes for their first question(s) and 20 minutes for each round that follows.

Republican members of the committee, in addition to Grassley, Hatch, and Graham, include John Cornyn of Texas, Mike Lee of Utah, Ted Cruz of Texas, Ben Sasse of Nebraska, Jeff Flake of Arizona, Mike Crapo of Idaho, Thom Tillis of North Carolina, and John Neely Kennedy of Louisiana.

The Democrats on the committee, in addition to Feinstein, are Kamala Harris of California, Cory Booker of New Jersey, Patrick Leahy of Vermont, Dick Durbin of Illinois, Sheldon Whitehouse of Rhode Island, Amy Klobuchar of Minnesota, Chris Coons of Delaware, Richard Blumenthal of Connecticut, and Mazie Hirono of Hawaii.

The committee membership and other details are linked here.

Rehearsal for a judicial confirmation is common, but one nominee to the U.S. Supreme Court famously did not take part in them. Robert Bork attended just one murder board and then cancelled the rest of them.

He was not confirmed to the Supreme Court in 1987, but his name became a political verb: To “bork” means to obstruct a candidate by any means possible, especially through systematic defamation and vilification.

Fun facts: Primary election, by the numbers

3

WHO WON THE MOST VOTES IN THE STATEWIDE RACES?

During the August Primary Election, 111,473 ballots were cast in Alaska. Which candidates in the statewide races pulled in the most?

Top Republican vote winners statewide:

1. Don Young, incumbent U.S. House: With 47,948 votes, the Dean of the House wins the prize. Again.
2. Mike Dunleavy, Republican candidate for governor: 42,233
3. Kevin Meyer, Republican candidate for lt. governor: 23,074
4. Mead Treadwell, Republican candidate for governor 22,078
5. Edie Grunwald, Republican candidate for lt. governor: 17,478
6. Thomas Nelson, Republican candidate for U.S. House: 10,512

The difference between Young’s count for U.S. House and Dunleavy’s count for governor was 5,715 votes, but Young had no strong Republican opponent, while Dunleavy faced Mead Treadwell.

But how is it that Sen. Kevin Meyer, running for lieutenant governor in a crowded field of six Republican candidates, was able to muster nearly 1,000 more votes than gubernatorial candidate Treadwell, who is both the former lieutenant governor and former U.S. Senate candidate with big name recognition?

Possibly because Treadwell jumped in the race for governor so late, which meant he never had time to make his case to voters.

Treadwell only did better than Dunleavy in three Alaska districts: In District 20, he won 41 more votes than Dunleavy; in District 32, he won 80 more votes; and in District 35, Treadwell won 98 more than Dunleavy.

Dunleavy swept every other district on the Republican side, including District 33, downtown Juneau, with Dunleavy winning 596 to Treadwell’s 515. (To be clear, on the Democrat ballot, Begich won 1,982 votes because District 33 is Begich country).

Dunleavy also won 92 percent of the precincts in Anchorage.

Top Democrat vote winners:

1. Debra Call, Democrat candidate for lt. governor: 32,880; in 2014, Hollis French was the top Democrat vote getter for lieutenant governor with 40,271.
2. Mark Begich, Democrat candidate for governor: 32,069; in 2014, Byron Mallott won 42,327 in the Democratic primary.
3. Alyse Galvin, Democrat candidate for U.S. House: 20,961, less than half of Rep. Don Young’s votes.

Wait, what? How did Debra Call get more votes than Begich on the Democrat ballot?

A possible explanation is the Libertarians had no person in the lieutenant governor’s slot, so likely those Libertarian voters simply put Debra Call in as their choice, since there was no one else on the ballot. Libertarians vote on the same ballot as the Democrats — the open ballot.

WHICH COMMUNITY HAD THE HIGHEST TURNOUT?

The precinct in Alaska with the highest turnout was Nikolai in District 37.

With a population of 94, and 73 people registered to vote, 39 votes were cast in Nikolai, for a stunning primary turnout of 53 percent.

Also doing well for turnout was Hughes, in District 40. Hughes has a population of 77. All but four of them — 73 people — are registered to vote, and 32 ballots cast for a turnout of 44 percent.

Following Hughes was Diomede, in District 39. The turnout there was 42 percent, with 32 of the 62 registered voters casting a ballot. Diomede’s population is 118.

WHICH COMMUNITY HAD THE LOWEST TURNOUT?

At this point, it’s Stevens Village, the one precinct in Alaska that has not reported its results to the Division of Elections. No one knows if Stevens Village even conducted an election at this point. There are 76 potential votes in Stevens Village, but no sign of them, and the village phones are not being answered.

The second lowest precincts for participation was a tie between Eielson Air Force Base in District 6, and JBER #2 in District 15, which both had a 1 percent turnout.

JBER is one of five precincts in District 15, where now a controversy over fraudulent voting has led to the Division of Elections turning over ballots to the Department of Law for investigation.

[Read: Criminal investigation underway, LeDoux up by 87 votes]

Alaska Supreme Court explains its Nageak v Mallott decision

1

TWO YEARS LATER, JUDGES SAY MISTAKES HAPPEN IN ELECTIONS

In the summer of 2016, the Primary Election went sideways across several communities in the rural north. In Shungnak, the election supervisor allowed every voter to vote two ballots — a Republican ballot and a Democrat ballot. In Ambler, votes went missing, and in Browerville, the election officials made Republicans vote a Democrat ballot if they were voting a questioned ballot.

The Division of Elections certified Westlake as the winner that September by an eight-vote margin, something that was not appropriate, according to critics. A lower court reversed it, but the Supreme Court upheld it in October of 2016 and said it would publish its opinion later.

It published its reasoning two years later, on Aug. 31, 2018. In the majority opinion of the court, the situation in Shungnak was an error on the part of the election worker, and such an error should not disenfranchise voters of their rights.

The voting anomaly was first identified by Must Read Alaska in 2016, when we noticed that 102 ballots had been cast by 51 people. We also reported that a similar anomaly occurred in Kivalina, and in Buckland, far too many “special needs” ballots had been cast — far more bedridden voters cast ballots than in all of populated Wasilla.

It appeared to this writer that voter fraud was occurring throughout District 40, and it had changed the outcome of the election, and thus, the power balance in the House of Representatives.

Nageak’s investigation, with the aid of the Alaska Republican Party, uncovered much more, and it was all given to the court.

But the judges wrote that mistakes happen:

“It is undisputed that all voters in Shungnak received and cast both the ADL and the Republican ballots. This was an error by Shungnak election officials. Nageak argues that we should not count any of the 51 votes from Shungnak, or alternatively, that we should proportionately reduce the number of Shungnak votes as the superior court did in the election contest. We conclude that challenges to elections based on election official error that go beyond the facial validity of the votes cast may not be brought under Alaska’s recount statute and therefore decline to discard the Shungnak votes on this basis.”

[Read the entire opinion and the dissenting opinion here.]

THE BEAT GOES ON

In 2016, the campaign manager for Dean Westlake was John-Henry Heckendorn, who is now the campaign manager for Gov. Bill Walker in his bid for re-election.

Heckendorn was the main witness to defend Westlake’s illegitimate win in District 40, while Randy Ruedrich spoke on behalf of the Nageak position.

In happier times, Gov. Bill Walker poses with Reps. Zach Fansler and Dean Westlake. Walker and his campaign manager John-Henry Heckendorn worked to replace two family men who served in the Legislature with the “swinging singles.” Fansler and Westlake both resigned within a year for misconduct with women.

Westlake took office and went on to be accused by a woman in Juneau of sexual harassment.  He was forced to resign after just one year in office. That woman, who was a legislative aide at the time, stated to a meeting of the Alaska Democratic Party that the party had not listened to her and others prior to the election, when the party was told that Westlake was a known harasser of women going back well before his time in public office.

Time for a grand jury for LeDoux votes

THE ANCHORAGE DAILY PLANET

While state officials are not saying much about whether they will investigate the shenanigans discovered in the House District 15 race that has incumbent Rep. Gabreille LeDoux the presumptive winner, it is clear somebody broke the law.

Who that “somebody” is remains to be seen.

LeDoux, trailing by three votes to political unknown Aaron Weaver in early tallies, has pulled ahead by 113 votes as counting of questioned and absentee ballots continues.

Elections officials report finding irregularities in the balloting, including seven absentee ballot applications under the names of dead people, and absentee votes cast in the name of at least two individuals who said they had not voted.

Continue reading here…

http://www.anchoragedailyplanet.com/130838/time-for-a-grand-jury/