Saturday, July 26, 2025
Home Blog Page 1414

Rules for Republicans on the ‘hearings war’

17

WITH APOLOGIES TO SAUL ALINSKY

By ART CHANCE
SENIOR CONTRIBUTOR

Over the last decade or so, Republicans have acquired some awareness of Saul Alinsky and his 1971 book, “Rules for Radicals.”

I read “Rules” when it first came out because I was a right-out-of-college, long-haired, dope-smoking, FM-radio-listening liberal in those days.  A few semesters of Life 101 dissuaded me of most of my college education and I tucked old Saul away in the recesses of memory.

There was still enough of my leftist education in me that I could ally myself with organized labor in the Seventies.  I knew and worked around and sometimes with all the major labor leaders of the era. They were often venal and avaricious, but they were loyal and patriotic Americans. When Jimmy Carter wanted to ship grain to the Soviet Union, the AFL-CIO refused to load the ships.

I spent the summer and fall of 1980 assigned by the AFL-CIO to Sen. Mike Gravel’s re-election campaign. That did it for me.   I realized that I’d gotten far enough up the ladder in organized labor to get myself in serious trouble, but not far enough up to get myself out of that trouble. Armed with the courage of my connections, I struck out into the private sector to make some money.

Fast forward a few years and was in Juneau, recently divorced and with custody of a teen-aged daughter. I needed a steady job with benefits in town and the State was looking for a labor relations analyst.

I was a bad fit, but they hired me. I was a hard-living Laborer’s union brawler, and the State’s labor relations staff were a bunch of prissy Juneau bureaucrats, mostly out of the State’s personnel system, and some who’d come over from the Alaska Public Employees Association. Plus, I was from Anchorage and that is good for being hated in Juneau. My resignation got written several times, but they couldn’t bring themselves to fire me and I couldn’t bring myself to quit.

In those days we were all in our 30s or early 40s and the labor arbitrators, mediators, and administrative law judges were in their 60s and 70s; they’d been corporate general counsels, law professors, judges, and the like. They’d gone to Harvard and Yale and such, and if you couldn’t keep up with the literary, and sometimes Biblical, allusions in their rulings and decisions, you got no respect. You learned to win by making your argument by allusion and in the footnotes; your adversary never knew what happened to him.

It was a fairly collegial world; we could pound our chests at each other all day and then join our adversary and the trier of fact at the bar for an after action analysis at the end of the day.  I loved my work in those days; I went to the State Office Building snack bar at lunch, got my sandwich and Coke and sat at the table in the office reading Hardin’s “The Developing Labor Law” or Elkouri’s “How Arbitration Works.”  If you live something, you get good at it.

Fast forward another 10 years: that world was all but gone. The largest group of State employees was now represented by the American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees (AFSCME) and their head was joined at the hip with President Bill Clinton.

They don’t do labor relations, they do guerilla theater. Those leather-bound hornbooks, treatises, and reporters in my office are gathering dust.

I returned to the Executive Branch from the Legislature in 1999 and one of the first things I did was buy a copy of Alinsky’s “Rules for Radicals” for every member of my professional staff.   I had a member of my staff digest it into what was essentially a playbook.  I put out a directive to all the human relations and labor relations staff in the departments that Labor Relations was calling the plays now and they were to take no action against the union mau-mauing supervisors or doing their guerilla theater act unless it was coordinated with labor relations.

Labor relations was no longer a matter of law and contract; it was just political posturing and we put all the books away and put a lot of wear on our copies of “Rules.”   Collective bargaining had simply become politics by other means.

Some conservatives/Republicans posit that we should adopt Alinsky tactics and use them against the left. The short answer is that generally you can’t; it is really hard to get a bunch of middle-aged, middle class Republicans to go to a bean dinner before a public hearing so they can stage a “fart-in.”

The appropriate response to an Alinsky-ite attack is to ignore it. If you ignore them, they’ll keep doing ever crazier things trying to get you to do something stupid and preferably violent. All the while as they do crazy things, they shed supporters.   At some point they do something indefensibly crazy and you smash them like bugs. It just takes patience and discipline.

As the Finance Committee’s recent budget road show unfolded and the naifs with AFP organized Gov. Michael Dunleavy’s tour, I thought of writing a piece on this, but I decided it was better to just let it play out; let the hearings get mobbed by the unions.

This is not a game Republicans can win; you aren’t going to get people with real jobs to turn out for the “hearings;” that’s the whole idea.

Let them have their echo chamber hearings; we won the election.

Art Chance is a retired Director of Labor Relations for the State of Alaska, formerly of Juneau and now living in Anchorage. He is the author of the book, “Red on Blue, Establishing a Republican Governance,” available at Amazon. 

Chmielowski sails through legislative interviews

5
Newly appointed Alaska Oil and Gas Conservation Commission member Jessie Chmielowski flew through her interview with both the Alaska House and Senate Resources committees on Monday, and received no apparent opposition from committee members.
She had been appointed to the seat that is reserved for a petroleum engineer. The committees referred her to their respective floors with a recommendation to confirm.
Chmielowski has replaced Cathy Foerster, who has retired after 14 years on the commission.
Meanwhile, Hollis French has until March 30 to appeal his dismissal to the Alaska Superior Court. Since that’s a Saturday, he’ll likely appeal the decision on Friday.
French occupied the AOGCC position reserved for a member of the public. That seat is currently vacant. French had been appointed by former Gov. Bill Walker as repayment for dropping his candidacy for lieutenant governor in 2014, so that Walker could form up a no-party ticket with Byron Mallott.
The agreement required French to drop his position as lieutenant governor nominee from the Democrat ticket, and lieutenant governor candidate Craig Fleener had to to drop from Walker’s no-party ticket.
French was dismissed last month from the AOGCC by Gov. Michael Dunleavy for poor attendance at work. That seat remains vacant, pending the expected appeal.

MRAK Almanac: Pilot alert, HAARP tests ahead

5

A new feature of Must Read Alaska: An almanac of atmospheric, geological, celestial, and other events around in Alaska, including that which makes our state unique Today’s installment:

  • If you’re heading out on your sled, check your transceiver strength and check the avalanche maps here.
  • Nenana Ice Classic ticketsare on sale through April 5, and the ice is record thin.
  • March 27 is the 55th anniversary of the Good Friday Earthquake of 1964.
  • For the record, we’ve had 9,738 earthquakes in Alaska so far this year.
  • Pilots beware of the FAA flight restrictions near Gulkana this week as HAARP beams go skyward again. The High-frequency Active Auroral Research Program, or HAARP, studies the properties and behavior of the ionosphere. Operation of the research facility was transferred from the United States Air Force to the University of Alaska Fairbanks in 2015, allowing HAARP to continue with exploration of ionospheric phenomenology via a land-use cooperative research and development agreement. HAARP is the world’s most capable high-power, high-frequency transmitter for study of the ionosphere.
  • Today is Seward’s Day in Alaska, in honor of William Seward, the secretary of state responsible for the purchase of Alaska. Our story is here.

 

Cruise lawsuit settlement — no harm, no foul

0

By WIN GRUENING
SENIOR CONTRIBUTOR

The recent agreement to resolve a long-running lawsuit between Cruise Lines International Association and the City and Borough of Juneau was greeted with relief by all concerned. It was approved by the Assembly on March 22.

The lawsuit, filed three years ago, arose from a disagreement over how the City of Juneau spent marine passenger fees collected from cruise ship passengers. After a December court ruling, Juneau decided not to appeal, in the belief that negotiation, rather than further litigation, was the wisest course.

What is most striking about the agreement is that the public will see minimal change from previous practices employed by the city.  Indeed, the settlement agreement essentially returns the litigating parties to their positions prior to the lawsuit, albeit with less acrimony, added guardrails, and a framework to help resolve differences arising in the future.

The agreement makes clear all past sins, if any, are forgiven. Legal expenses, $1.5 million by the cruise industry and $800,000 in direct legal fees paid to outside counsel incurred by Juneau, have been or will be reimbursed through marine passenger fees.

Juneau and the cruise industry jointly acknowledge past passenger fee uses may or may not have survived future legal challenges. But both agree that previously disputed projects and expenses, as well some specified as currently budgeted and planned, can utilize passenger fees, in whole or in part.

Juneau retains local control over downtown marine upland improvements but the cruise lines may rely on guidelines regarding funding uses. To accomplish this, the agreement delineates two geographic areas in downtown Juneau, Zone A and Zone B, where proposed uses would be considered.

Win Gruening

Zone A roughly encompasses marine uplands from the AJ Dock to the Subport.  Zone B includes the area from Gold Creek to Douglas Bridge as well as the core downtown area between Main Street and Franklin Street.

Within Zone A, the cruise lines will not object to and the City of Juneau will be free to propose and budget such capital improvements that further the marine enterprise/operation of cruise ships. Also included are operational services for crew and passengers traditionally provided in the past such as crossing guards, security patrols, and general overhead support.

For proposed passenger fee uses within Zone B, Juneau and the cruise lines agree to discuss these ideas at an annual meeting of the parties.

While it’s possible to fund projects or expenses outside these two zones, the agreement implies this would be a rare occurrence subject to mutual agreement and approval by the Assembly.

Astute observers of the agreement will note the relative absence of definitive language.   Instead, “shall endeavor” or “shall use their best efforts” or “shall discuss” are used throughout.  A paragraph concerning dispute resolution emphasizes “direct discussion” and failing that to proceed to “amicable non-binding mediation”.  As a last resort, either party may file suit in U.S. District Court.

The agreement is remarkable in that, despite past litigation, it’s not primarily based on any judicial ruling, rather it is based on mutual recognition of the value of the beneficial relationship between the community of Juneau and the cruise industry.

The industry’s positive economic impact to Juneau cannot be overstated.  By 2020, the industry will be directly responsible for an estimated $17 million in marine passenger fees, $11 million in collected sales taxes, and over $2 million in property tax. This is in addition to direct economic benefits from related employment, crew spending and cruise line payments for supporting goods and services.

As with any business partnership, there is no legal contract that can prevent its failure if the partners don’t trust and respect each other.

The cruise industry and the City of Juneau both deserve credit for their willingness to consider the needs and priorities of the other and recognize the value each brings to the partnership.

Addressing concerns about impacts of cruise ship visitors requires an honest and collaborative relationship between our community and the industry.

This agreement, in its simplicity, puts the burden on both parties to not only stick to its provisions but also live up to its spirit of cooperation and fairness.

Win Gruening retired as the senior vice president in charge of business banking for Key Bank in 2012. He was born and raised in Juneau and graduated from the U.S. Air Force Academy in 1970. He is active in community affairs as a 30-plus year member of Juneau Downtown Rotary Club and has been involved in various local and statewide organizations.

Happy Seward’s Day, Alaska state government workers!

8

Monday, March 25 is Seward’s Day, the uniquely Alaska day that allows State of Alaska workers a day off on the last Monday of every March to enjoy time with their families and friends. It’s one of the unique benefits afforded to State workers, along with a 37.5 hour work week.

So who is William Seward? Depends on who you ask. For some Alaska Natives, he is the epitome of colonial expansion policy of Manifest Destiny, 19th-century doctrine that the expansion of the United States throughout the American continents was inevitable and proper.

Few remember that Seward, a Republican, was seriously injured and was, indeed, an actual target of the 1865 assassination plot that killed Lincoln.

Seward remained Secretary of State through the presidency of Andrew Johnson, during which he negotiated the Alaska Purchase in 1867, and he was loyal to Johnson during his impeachment.

Here’s the official State Department biography of him:

In 1861, Abraham Lincoln chose his former rival for the Republican presidential nomination Senator William Henry Seward of New York to be his Secretary of State. He served under Lincoln and his successor, Andrew Johnson, until 1869.   Although Seward was at times impetuous – shortly after taking office in 1861 he proposed to Lincoln that the Union be preserved by starting a war with France or Spain – Lincoln blocked his imprudent projects and channeled his brilliance and effervescence into more useful activities.

An outspoken abolitionist, Seward negotiated the Lyons-Seward Treaty of 1862, which put in place new measures to end the Atlantic slave trade.

During the Civil War, he carefully managed diplomatic relations with Great Britain and France. He persuaded the British government to stop British shipyards from building war ships for the Confederacy. And he continually pressed the French and British not to recognize the Confederate states as an independent nation.  His success on behalf of the Union cause was rewarded by an attempted assassination on the same night that the conspirators killed Lincoln.  Fortunately, Seward survived the attack.

Seward was a firm proponent of the Monroe Doctrine and a firm believer in its philosophical underpinning, Manifest Destiny—the inevitability of the United States expanding west to the Pacific Ocean.  As early as 1846, Seward had stated that “our population is destined to roll its resistless waves to the icy barriers of the north, and to encounter oriental civilization on the shores of the Pacific.”

The end of the Civil War in 1865 enabled him to put his beliefs into practice.  Two of his major achievements occurred in 1867.  With the use of restraint, tact, and wisdom, Seward’s efforts over several years to persuade Emperor Napoleon III to withdraw French troops from Mexico came to fruition.

That same year, Seward negotiated the purchase of Alaska from Russia for $7.2 million. He had wisely invited Senator Charles Sumner, the chairman of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, to join him in the negotiation with the Russian minister.  Sumner persuaded the Senate to give its consent to the treaty, 37 to 2.

When the appropriation for the purchase languished in the House of Representatives, reflecting the views of Eastern newspapers which ridiculed the agreement as “Seward’s Folly,” the mostly favorable Western newspapers helped to persuade public opinion and the House to support the purchase.

The sale ended Russian influence in North America, gave the United States access to the northern Pacific Ocean, and added territory nearly twice the size of Texas for about 2 cents an acre. Asked to name his greatest achievement, Seward said “The purchase of Alaska, but it will take the people a generation to find it out.”

Seward also attempted to purchase the Danish West Indies (Virgin Islands) and to annex the Dominican Republic in the Caribbean.  Not content with having reached the Pacific Coast, Seward wanted to move into the Pacific itself, to support both trade with the East and the defense of the United States.  While he successfully appropriated Midway Island, he was not successful in gaining control of the Hawaiian Islands.

How many have voted in Anchorage so far?

As of Monday, March 25, approximately 15,665 Anchorage residents have cast their ballots in the Anchorage Municipal Election. The state’s largest city is in its second mail-in election, after launching the program in 2018.

Last year, 79,275 ballots were cast, of the 218,388 registered voters in the Anchorage bowl. This year, about 216,000 ballots were mailed out by the Muni’s Election Office.

Those ballots were printed in Washington state and mailed the week of March 10; they are due back by April 2. With nine days left, another 63,610 voters will need to get busy in order to match last year’s record.

Going door to door in the Fairview neighborhood are canvassers from the progressive Alaska Center (for the Environment), to boost the liberal turnout. Another group is canvassing conservative voters to make sure they vote down the 5 percent alcohol tax proposed by the city to raise money for homeless services.

Mailing your ballot is not the only option. There are secure drop boxes in locations around the city, and they are being emptied by election workers regularly. You can also vote on April 2 in person at limited locations – check the list here.

[Check this list for a drop box near you]

Need to know more? Check out Must Read Alaska’s previous reports on the municipal election, then go find that ballot in the stack of junk mail — your vote could make the difference.

[Read: List of candidates]

[Read: Five things you should know about the ballot propositions]

[Read: Anchorage voters to decide on alcohol tax]

That time leading Democrats promised evidence would point to ‘collusion’

THEY WILL FACE NO CONSEQUENCE FOR THEIR DISINFORMATION CAMPAIGN

Over the past two years of special counsel Robert Mueller’s investigation into collusion with Russia by President Donald Trump’s campaign, leading Democrats have bet the farm on certain outcomes and hyped the “collusion” theory to all of America, with the help of the mainstream media. They said it was a slam dunk: Collusion and impeachment.

Today, Attorney General William Barr released a summary of the report. The verdict? No collusion. Pure and simple. If Barr’s summary is inaccurate, surely Mueller would have stated that by now.

Here’s a brief sample of what key Democrats have been saying to warp the public dialogue for the past two years. These are but a fraction of the “on message” unfounded allegations from sitting members of Congress in a coordinated effort to destroy public confidence in the president. In other words, actual collusion by Democrats:

COLLUSION HYPE

  • Sen. Richard Blumenthal: “The evidence is pretty clear that there was collusion between the Trump campaign and the Russians.” (MSNBC’S “All In,” 10/17/18)
  • Rep. Adam Schiff: “Well, look, there’s clear evidence of an attempt to collude.” (CNN’s “The Situation Room” 12/14/17)
  • Sen. Ron Wyden: “I think there was clearly an intent to collude.” (CNN’s “Wolf,” 12/15/17)
  • Rep. Adam Schiff: “I think there’s plenty of evidence of collusion.” (“CBS This Morning” 08/05/18)
  • DNC Chair Tom Perez: “Over the course of the last year, we have seen, I think a mountain of evidence of collusion between the campaign and the Russians.” (Fox’s “The Five,” 04/23/18)
  • Rep. Eric Swalwell: “We saw strong evidence of collusion … I think that’s clear collusion.” (CNN’s “Wolf,” 03/16/18)
  • Rep. Jerry Nadler, chair of House Judiciary: “…we know there was collusion with people in the campaign with Russians.” (MSNBC’s “All In,” 10/27/17)
  • Rep. Maxine Waters: “And I am so depending on our special counsel Robert Mueller to connect the dots so that he can prove the collusion.” (MSNBC’s “All In,” 08/04/18)
  • Sen. Richard Blumenthal: “There are indictments in this president’s future,” (MSNBC’s “Morning Joe” March 21, 2019)
  • Sen. Richard Blumental: “Even more so now than ever before, according to the intelligence we’re receiving, we need to understand what Vladimir Putin and the Trump campaign may have done together, but also the obstruction of justice that was done by the president of the United States in real time.” (MSNBC’S “Morning Joe” March 21, 2019)

IMPEACHMENT/WATERGATE HYPE

  • Rep. Adam Schiff: “I think, of a size and scope probably beyond Watergate.” (ABC’s “This Week,” 05/27/18)
  • Sen. Richard Blumenthal: “It may well produce impeachment proceedings.” (CNN’s “Anderson Cooper 360,” 05/10/17)
  • Rep. Jerry Nadler: “I think it shows that Mueller is in the old Watergate sense, following the money.” (CNN’s “Erin Burnett Outfront,” 04/04/18)
  • DNC Chair Tom Perez: “On a certain level, this is worse than Watergate.” (Fox’s “Trish Regan Primetime,” 11/08/18)
  • Sen. Richard Blumenthal: “It’s a Watergate Moment.” (CBS’ “This Morning,” 08/23/18)
  • Sen. Bernie Sanders: “Obviously, the suggestion is it goes back to Watergate.” (CNN’s “The Situation Room,” 05/10/17)
  • Sen. Ron Wyden: “That is almost a Watergate-level effort to interfere with an ongoing investigation.”  (CNN’s “New Day,” 06/08/17)

Unfortunate nature of government: Spending more than we have

30

FEEL-GOOD POLITICS DOESN’T PAY THE BILLS

By REP. JOSH REVAK

Planning and readiness.

They are the most critical elements needed for success in any endeavor. Through six years in the U.S. military and two deployments to the Middle East, I had no choice but to accept that planning and readiness are, in fact, the greatest defenses one has when staring any adversity, or even death, in the face.

When it counts, it is planning and logical thinking – not emotional reaction – that keeps you alive and afloat.

Today, as I sit in Juneau as a member of the citizen Legislature, I am increasingly concerned that far too many Capitol players and influencers have adopted the practice of emotional sensationalism to avoid hard conversations about fiscal planning and readiness.

Over the past month, I’ve watched as special interests launched protests and organized biased public testimony. I’ve overheard community organizers imploring their followers to act like children who are threatened with the loss of a toy rather than rational adults focused on solving fiscal problems.

The fact that special interest groups can get away with using vulnerable people to manufacture crises as a way of avoiding unpopular conversations about real problems is, in my opinion, abhorrent. Nonetheless, this outrage has led to the House Majority’s conclusion that the government must continue to grow.

At what expense, though?

The Majority claims to have a plan to pay for more government spending, so why haven’t they talked about the specifics of it publicly? Is the plan for an income tax? Is the plan for an 80 percent cut to the Permanent Fund dividend, as the rumors have circulated? Alaskans deserve to know what will be asked of their pocketbooks before legislators rush a budget through before the deadline.

House members are right to scrutinize specific elements of the governor’s budget, but to throw it out the window completely in favor of a management plan created by a previous governor of Alaska is a slap to the face of Alaskans. We are sent to Juneau to implement their will – not to tell them that we know better than they do.

Until we address our spending problem and enforce a working spending cap, it doesn’t matter how much revenue we bring in as a state – we will always spend more than we have. That is the unfortunate nature of government. We’re taking a lot of buns out of the oven, but we aren’t putting any dough back in.

The state has a spending and accountability problem. If they are going to take your money to continue feeding the beast, they should at least let you know what their plan is.

While it’s true we need to look out for the needs of Alaskans, emotional sensationalism will not drive good policy decisions – logic and data will. Let’s have the tough conversations, right-size government, and implement a plan to prepare Alaska for decades to come.

Feel-good politics doesn’t pay the bills.

Rep. Josh Revak is a six-year combat veteran and recipient of the Purple Heart. Elected in 2018, he serves Anchorage District 25 as a member of the Alaska House of Representatives.

Mat-Su testifies: Cut the budget

WHILE KETCHIKAN AND BETHEL VOICE GRAVE CONCERN OVER CUTS

The statewide discussion about the state budget is under way this weekend. On Friday, it was Juneau, and Saturday members of the House Finance Committee fanned out to Ketchikan, Bethel, Mat-Su, and Kenai to hear what Alaskans have to say.

Today, the Finance Committee leadership, which is under the control of Democrats, appear in Anchorage, Sitka, and Fairbanks to hear from Alaskans about the size of government and how to pay for it.

It’s a discussion prompted by the proposed budget of Gov. Michael Dunleavy, who downsized the government footprint to be about 78 percent of what it is today– a $1.6 billion cut starting July 1.

MAT-SU IS ‘DUNLEAVY COUNTRY’

Nearly 200 people attended the hearing in Wasilla, and the testimony went about two-to-one in favor of Gov. Michael Dunleavy’s austere budget and constitutional amendments to limit taxes, pay a full Permanent Fund dividend, and put a spending cap in place.

Rep. Tammie Wilson, a North Pole Republican member of the Democrat-led majority, moderated the meeting under the watchful eye of Speaker Bryce Edgmon, a Democrat who changed his party registration to undeclared so that he could form a caucus controlled by Democrats, but with Republican members.

Edgmon was noticeably uncomfortable in the conservative Mat-Su Valley and left about a third of the way through the hearing. He was heading to Kenai to monitor that hearing, which was occurring later in the day.

Some in the Mat-Su who testified expressed concern that education and health service cuts would devastate the state. A few attendees landed in the middle, favoring both moderate cuts and taxes. One person mentioned saving the ferries. But, as one woman put it, “this is Dunleavy country and karma is a b*tch!” She, like many others, said government had grown too large and she didn’t want to pay taxes for more of it.

With 11 pages of people signed up to testify, and about 17 names per page, some people gave up and left before they could be called to give their opinion at the Mat-Su Legislative Information Office.  Not all could fit in the room, so they spilled into the outer office and small meeting room to wait their turn.

The beginning of the meeting trended 90-10 in favor of budget cuts, but as the hours went on, more teachers and health care workers arrived and testified about the need for either a static budget or more funding for programs. Several from the “red for ed” movement came and spoke for saving education from the chopping block.

But teacher Dee McKee, winner of the BP Teacher of Excellence Award (2017) told the panel that education is an area that does have waste.

She pointed to the Nome School District, which receives funding for more than 1,500 students, but that the school only has 674 students. She was referring to the multiplier effect that incentivizes school districts to label students for special education, so the district can get more money.

“We have ghost students. This is insane. If you’re looking at education, and if this is typical, it’s got to get fixed,” she said.

Lisa Shelby, a principal at Susitna Valley Jr/Sr High spoke about how well her students do in graduation rates and test scores, compared to others around the state, and how much the school does for students, including providing a lot of lunches for students from lower-income families.

John Nelson, a financial adviser who ran for Congress in 2018, testified, “We do have a spending problem. We do have to get it under control.”

In Bethel, the testifiers were most, if not all, opposed to spending cuts.

Beverly Hoffman said that she was born in Bethel and was worried, saying even the mention of cuts had created chaos.

“This administration has just wanted to shock the crap out of us,” she said, “It’s deplorable, that’s the word. We know how to live here. We’re grateful for PCE [power cost equalization payments]. It’s ludicrous. I wish he [Dunleavy] came here today. Boy he’d get an earful. We deserve the best in education. The best in public safety, the best in health [care].” Hoffman is a local activist for the failed Stand for Salmon initiative that was on the November General Election ballot and opposes the Donlin Mine.

Meanwhile, back in Wasilla, Tammy Miller was telling legislators that she has learned how to cut her expenses when she’s faced losing a portion of her income “and I also look at how my money is used and I don’t throw good money after bad.” She expects government to do the same.

Berkley Tilton, married to Rep. Cathy Tilton, encouraged lawmakers to use the existing historic formula for calculating the Permanent Fund dividend and to initiate a spending cap, as proposed by the governor, and Lyle Downing (no relation to this writer) testified that the dividend should not be considered a revenue stream for services.

Carol Carman spoke about education funding, but then turned to Speaker Edgmon and addressed him on another matter that has been on her mind:

“Rep. [Matt] Claman has an ethics problem. He is chair of Judiciary, and he is a practicing lawyer. What are you going to do about it?” Under the ethics rules of the Legislature, Claman is not allowed to serve in a position where he has a conflict of interest, and as a trial lawyer, he is handling criminal justice reform legislation as a committee chair.
Rep. Wilson said she would take that comment back to Juneau for consideration.

After nearly three hours in Wasilla, 187 had signed up, 85 had testified, and it was running about two-to-one in favor of budget cuts.

Other legislators who attended the meeting in the Mat-Su included Reps. DeLena Johnson, David Eastman, and Cathy Tilton and Sens. Shelley Hughes and Mike Shower, all from the Valley. They are part of the 15-member Republican minority that was created after fellow Republicans Tammie Wilson, Chuck Kopp, Jennifer Johnston, Bart LeBon, Gary Knopp, and Steve Thompson left the Republican Majority and joined Democrats in a coalition, which already had two putative Republicans in it.

Farther to the south, 150 people in Ketchikan attended their hearing on Saturday and many said they want the ferry system, education, and social services saved. Ketchikan is the headquarters of the Alaska Marine Highway System, yet also was a stronghold for support for Gov. Dunleavy in the recent election. About 50 people spoke during that Saturday hearing, moderated by Rep. Daniel Ortiz.

Hearings continue today:

Anchorage: Sunday, March 24 from 2-5 p.m. at the Anchorage LIO, 1500 W. Benson Boulevard, Anchorage

Sitka: Sunday, March 24 from 2-5 p.m. at Centennial Hall Assembly Chambers, 330 Harbor Drive, Sitka

Fairbanks: Sunday, March 24 from 2-5 p.m. at the Fairbanks LIO, 1292 Sadler Way, Suite 308, Fairbanks

(With apologies to Kenai, this writer was not able to monitor that hearing on Saturday.)