Monday, November 10, 2025
Home Blog Page 14

Foodies and Foragers: Tomatoes Fresh Off the Vine

10

By BRENDA JOSEPHSON

Nothing compares to the burst of flavor from a homegrown tomato, freshly picked from the vine and savored in its pure, raw perfection. This experience allows its essence to shine undiminished by cooking or baking.

Tomatoes are an excellent complement to a fresh catch, whether enjoyed in salads or alongside mozzarella in a caprese. They also shine in a classic bacon, lettuce, and tomato sandwich. Their vibrant colors and rich flavors enhance any dish, making them a seasonal highlight that many eagerly anticipate each year. Whether savored on their own or incorporated into a larger recipe, homegrown tomatoes truly celebrate the essence of the season.

BLT, Zesty Alaskan Garden Medley, Balsamic-glazed Halibut with Tomato and Fresh Mozzarella Salad

Recipes for Zesty Alaskan Garden Medley, Caprese, Salad, and Balsamic Dressing are provided below.

Homegrown tomatoes often taste better because they are typically picked at peak ripeness, which allows their natural sweetness to shine. Furthermore, when you grow them yourself, you can control the growing conditions, ensuring they are free from pesticides and full of flavor. This personal touch enhances their taste and creates a sense of satisfaction and connection to the food you consume.

If you have the time and interest to grow vegetables, you may discover that it deepens your appreciation for the effort involved in cultivating food. Each harvest serves as a celebration of your hard work and commitment, promoting a healthier lifestyle and increasing your awareness of seasonal produce. The joy of consuming food that you have personally harvested can make each meal feel uniquely special.

In Alaska, our short growing season and cold temperatures present challenges when cultivating tomatoes. To achieve successful crops, Alaskan gardeners address these challenges by carefully selecting early-ripening tomato varieties, starting seeds indoors, and utilizing greenhouses and hoop houses for growth.

On a recent trip to Skagway, I visited Skip Elliott’s garden and greenhouses and was impressed by the wide variety of tomatoes he was growing. Skip is an avid gardener known for his successful harvests of kohlrabi and fava beans. My initial motivation for the visit was to check on his fava bean crop. I interviewed Skip last spring and wrote about the success he was having with his Alaska-grown fava beans in Foodies and foragers: Fabulous Alaska fava beans from garden trellis to table.

Skip Elliot

Despite a cold, wet start to summer and an infestation of little woolly bear caterpillars, his fava bean crop was thriving. However, as impressive as the fava beans are, his tomatoes—the real stars—were beginning to show their potential. The vibrant green vines were full of clusters of bright red and golden fruits in various sizes, ranging from cherry tomatoes to large slicers.

This was intriguing to me because each year, tomatoes are planted in my greenhouse with the hope of a bountiful harvest. However, recent seasons have led to disappointing yields. Consequently, I was eager to learn about the strategies that had worked well for Skip.

He mentioned that he is not an expert in growing tomatoes; however, for the past four years, he has embarked on a scientific quest to identify tomato varieties that thrive in our climate with a short growing season while also delivering desirable flavor. He evaluates desirability by conducting personal taste tests, where he compares the flavors of various tomato varieties in his growing conditions.

Skip’s tomato taste testing line-up

His research is ongoing, but in the hopes of improving next year’s tomato crop in my greenhouse, I asked him to share which varieties he has identified as top performers.

Skip discussed his method for narrowing down his top picks by evaluating them from multiple perspectives, including production costs, exceptional flavor, and harvest yields. He remarked, “It is hard to find a variety that tastes good and can be grown in abundance.”

Based on his research at this time, Skip identifies his top picks for cherry tomatoes as Artemis, Sungold, Sun Orange, and Esterina. Artemis is his favorite due to its vibrant red color, ease of growth, and uniquely delicious smoky flavor. Sungold performs well with a pleasant flavor profile. Sun Orange is similar to Sungold, but according to Skip, it has less tang and is a bit sweeter with the extra bonus of bearing more fruit per plant. Esterina makes the list with a note of caution regarding its tendency to grow excessively; however, Skip says it offers a fabulous flavor, and a benefit of its vigorous growth is that it continues to produce fruit into October.

When it comes to sauce tomatoes, Pilu is Skip’s top choice. He explains, “Pilu tomatoes are excellent for soups and sauces; they are cold-tolerant and yield well.”

Skip also holds Oregon Spring and Siletz in high regard, stating, “They are nearly identical; both are determinate, cold-tolerant, short-season varieties that grow in a small area. It’s amazing to see a plant that is only four feet high produce ten to twelve large fruits. You don’t need to do much work to grow them, and they thrive in greenhouses. They are not perfect slicers for sandwiches, but they are close.”

While in Skagway I also met with John McDermott, who has been growing tomatoes for over thirty years. When asked about his favorite slicer tomato, he was quick to mention the Mortgage Lifter. He explained that it is a well-established heirloom variety known for producing large fruits that are ideal for sandwiches.

Prepared with a plan to focus on specific tomato varieties for next year’s growing season, the final question was where to obtain the seeds. John emphasized the importance of sourcing from seed producers in the Pacific Northwest that have varieties that can thrive in our climate, which include Territorial Seed and Osborne Quality Seeds.

Other suppliers in the Pacific Northwest include Adaptive Seeds, One Green World Nursery, Uprising Seeds, Siskiyou Seeds, and a few additional companies. Some suppliers source their seeds from various regions, so it is essential to investigate the origins of the seeds before making a purchase.

Johnny’s Selected Seeds, located in Maine, sources some of its seeds from the Pacific Northwest, which are well-suited for Alaska’s climate. Tomato Growers in Florida have a strong track record of providing both seeds and supplies and also offer short-season tomato varieties that are productive in Alaskan greenhouses.

To achieve optimal results, take the time to research which seed varieties will thrive in your specific conditions and ensure you obtain them from reputable suppliers. This careful selection can result in a more abundant harvest of fresh tomatoes to enjoy.

Here are a few recipe ideas that showcase the fresh and vibrant flavors of vine-ripened tomatoes, highlighting their versatility in various dishes. You might enjoy preparing a Zesty Alaskan Garden Medley, creating a classic Caprese salad with fresh mozzarella and basil, or mixing up a simple balsamic vinaigrette to enhance a fresh garden salad topped with tomatoes.

Zesty Alaskan Garden Medley

Zesty Alaskan Garden Medley

This refreshing cold dish features seasonal vegetables sourced from Alaskan gardens and is drizzled with a zesty lemon vinaigrette. Draw inspiration from your own garden to explore seasonal variations.

Medley Ingredients:

1 head of cauliflower (or substitute broccoli), cleaned, dried, and cut into florets

1 fennel bulb, cleaned, thinly sliced, and stored in water with lemon juice

(Alternatively, you can substitute one bulb of kohlrabi and add ½ teaspoon of ground fennel in the vinaigrette.)

2 to 3 ounces of lemon juice (as needed for fennel bulb lemon water)

8 ounces of green beans (or substitute snow peas or sugar snap peas),

cleaned, cut, and blanched

1 ½ cups of cherry tomatoes, halved (or cubed tomatoes)

½ cup parsley, chopped (for the garnish)

Zesty Lemon Vinaigrette Ingredients:

2 lemons, zested and juiced (or substitute 5 of ounces lemon juice)

1 tablespoon minced shallots (or substitute 1 small garlic clove, minced)

1 teaspoon Dijon mustard

1 teaspoon fresh thyme (or substitute ½ teaspoon dried thyme)

5 ounces olive oil

¼ teaspoon salt, more or less to taste

½ teaspoon freshly cracked black pepper, more or less to taste

Yields approximately 8 servings.

Preparation:

The lemon vinaigrette is made by mixing together lemon juice, lemon zest, minced shallots, Dijon mustard, and thyme. Use a whisk or immersion blender to blend the ingredients until the mixture is smooth. Then, slowly drizzle in the olive oil to help the ingredients emulsify. Season with salt and pepper to taste. Set the vinaigrette aside while you prepare the vegetables.

Next wash all the vegetables under cool water, then trim and cut them as indicated above. To prepare the fennel bulb start by cutting the bulb in half and then slicing it very thinly. Have a bowl with lemon water available to transfer the fennel slices. Store the fennel in the lemon water while blanching the green beans.

Blanch the green beans by placing a large pot of water on the stove over high heat, ensuring there is enough water to fully submerge the beans. Add salt to the water at a rate of approximately 1 teaspoon per quart. While waiting for the water to boil, prepare a bowl filled with ice water for an ice bath. Once the water reaches a boil, add the green beans and allow it to boil again. Boil the green beans for one minute. After boiling, drain the green beans and immediately transfer them to the ice bath to stop the cooking process. The goal is to have the green beans blanched but still crisp. Once they are chilled, drain the beans again and refrigerate them while you prepare the other ingredients.

When all the vegetables are prepared, drain the fennel and combine all the vegetables together in a large bowl and gently toss together while drizzling with the lemon vinaigrette taking care to evenly coat the vegetables. Garnish by sprinkling the chopped parsley on top.

Store under refrigeration, serve cold to enjoy this crisp and fresh seasonal garden medley.

Caprese Salad

Classic Caprese Salad

It doesn’t get any easier to enjoy vine-ripened tomatoes than with a Caprese salad. This recipe is quick and can be easily adjusted to make use of just one tomato at a time as they ripen. You likely already have balsamic vinegar and olive oil in your pantry; if that’s the case, all you need to add to your shopping list is some fresh mozzarella from the market.

Ingredients:

2 cups of balsamic vinegar

3 to 4 tomatoes, sliced

12 ounces fresh mozzarella cheese, sliced

1 bunch of fresh basil leaves

1 ounce olive oil, more or less for drizzling

Salt and freshly ground black pepper, to taste

Yields approximately 4 servings

Preparation:

Place the balsamic vinegar in a small saucepan over medium-high heat and bring it to a boil. Then, reduce the heat to medium-low and let it simmer for about 15 minutes, or until it has reduced by half and has thickened to a glaze that coats the back of a spoon. Remove the saucepan from the heat and transfer the glaze to a separate container to cool.

Just before serving, layer the tomatoes, fresh mozzarella cheese, and fresh basil on a serving dish, alternating each ingredient. Drizzle the arrangement with olive oil, followed by the balsamic glaze. Finally, sprinkle with salt and freshly ground black pepper.

Enjoy the Caprese salad by itself or paired with crispy bread.

Balsamic vinaigrette topped Caprese-style garden salad with balsamic-glazed halibut

Balsamic Vinaigrette

This recipe is an excellent go-to for dressing a wide range of salads. It is simple to prepare, and the inclusion of Dijon mustard aids in the easy emulsification, resulting in a smooth consistency that coats the lettuce without being too thick. You can adjust the flavors to suit your preferences by varying the amount of olive oil and finishing the dressing with your desired level of salt and freshly cracked black pepper. Additionally, this dressing keeps well in the refrigerator for several days; just remember to stir it thoroughly and let it reach room temperature before using it on your salad.

Note: The balsamic-glazed halibut shown in the picture above was prepared by spooning a light glaze of balsamic reduction over pan-seared halibut just before removing it from the sauté pan.

Ingredients:

½ cup balsamic vinegar

1 tablespoon minced shallots (or substitute 1 small garlic clove, minced)

1 teaspoon Dijon mustard

1 teaspoon fresh basil (or substitute ½ teaspoon dried basil)

1 cup of olive oil

¼ teaspoon salt, more or less to taste

½ teaspoon freshly cracked black pepper, more or less to taste

Preparation:

Combine balsamic vinegar, minced shallots, Dijon mustard, and basil in a bowl or mixing container. Using a whisk or immersion blender, mix the vinegar, shallots, mustard, basil, until they are fully incorporated. Slowly drizzle in the olive oil to allow for emulsification. Season with salt and pepper to taste. Add more of the olive oil if the flavor is too tangy for your taste preference. Set the mixture aside while preparing the vegetables.

Enjoy the bold and sweet flavor of this dressing, which beautifully complements grilled seafood or chicken, adding a delightful tang to your meal. Additionally, this dressing works well as a substitute for drizzling over sliced tomatoes and fresh mozzarella in a Caprese-style dish.

Brenda Josephson is a Haines resident. She enjoys spending time fishing, foraging, and savoring Alaska’s abundance of natural and wild foods with her family. Brenda serves as a board member of Alaska Gold Communications, Inc., the publisher of Must Read Alaska. You can contact her by email at [email protected].

Roadless Rule Repeal Empowers Local Land Management

9

By SARAH MONTALBANO

On June 23, Secretary of Agriculture Brooke Rollins announced the repeal of the 2001 Roadless Rule. The Clinton-era rule had restricted timber harvesting and road construction on 58 million acres of U.S. Forest Service (USFS) lands, about a third of U.S. forest lands. Closing off access to public, working USFS lands has stifled responsible forest management and halted economic opportunity for local communities.

In Alaska’s Tongass National Forest, the Roadless Rule restricted access to 9.2 million acres of the forest, which spans 16.7 million acres total. The first Trump administration briefly made a small portion of the Tongass eligible for timber harvesting and road construction in 2020. The result? Only 186,000 more acres of timber harvest would have been eligible, and only 50 more miles of new roads could be constructed over the next 100 years. President Biden announced a review of the Roadless Rule within hours of his inauguration and subsequently reinstated the 2001 limits.

Sustainable forest management entails the selective cutting of some trees to thin the forest and decrease the fuel load, reducing the risk of catastrophic wildfires. For forests within the inventoried roadless areas, the restrictions limited the ability of the USFS to undertake prescribed burns, mechanical thinning, and other timber harvesting activities, as well as impeded access for firefighters.

Secretary Rollins said that the rescission of the rule removes “absurd obstacles to common sense management of our natural resources” and that “properly managing our forests preserves them from devastating fires and allows future generations of Americans to enjoy and reap the benefits of this great land.” The press release also estimates that of the acreage impacted by the Roadless Rule, 28 million acres are in areas at high or very high risk of wildfire.

The Roadless Rule has also harmed local communities. The USDA’s press release states that “Utah alone estimates the roadless rule alone creates a 25% decrease in economic development in the forestry sector.” More than 70,000 people live within the boundaries of the Tongass. Southeast Alaskans who depend on the timber industry near the Tongass have seen employment decline to fewer than 400 jobs in 2020, a tenth of the jobs available in 1990.

Chairman of the House Committee on Natural Resources, Bruce Westerman (R., AR), said that the decision “acknowledges that we cannot lock up our forests and throw away the key.” Utah Governor Spencer Cox said of the rule, “A good forest is like a garden. You actually have to tend it and take care of it. If we do this the right way, we can prevent fires and improve production.”

Kudos to the administration for tending to the gardens that are the working lands of the U.S. Forest Service.

Sarah Montalbano is an energy policy fellow at Center of the American Experiment and a senior fellow at the Independent Women’s Forum Center for Energy and Conservation. This column was originally published at IWF on July 1, 2025.

Alexander Dolitsky: Pro-Palestine activism is not the cause; it’s a far-left death cult.

20

By ALEXANDER DOLITSKY

“Pro-Palestine activism” in the West has turned into an anti-Semitic cult-like witch hunt. Indeed, it is less about social progress and more about brutal punishment, harassment and violence. Ironically, its political activism is dressed up as a moral conviction and social compassion, while holding a “Molotov cocktail” in hand.

Most people believe cult members are mentally unbalanced or are misfits who live in remote places, like the doomed devotees of Jim Jones and David Koresh; or various far-left cult members, including “Climate Change” activists, “Black Lives Matter,” “ANTIFA,” and some “World Peace” organizations that are calling for cease-fire in Gaza.

We take comfort in the fact that the influences of cults are far removed from our everyday lives. Nothing could be further from the truth. In her book, Cults in Our Midst: The Hidden Menace in Our Everyday Lives (1995), Margaret Thaler Singer (MTS for short in this article), outlined several key categories of cults and their followers. Here are some excerpts from her book, with my editorial comments:  

“Today, nearly 20 million people have joined about 5,000 cults in the United States. Often a cult is disguised as a legitimate organization, and anyone, especially our young, could be susceptible to the covert and seductive nature of a cult. During periods of traumatic life changes, people are especially vulnerable to these masterful manipulations.” (MTS).

It is imperative, therefore, to prevent the spread of cults’ influence the way our society prevents the spread of racism, neo-Nazism, anti-Semitism, and discrimination of minorities. To prevent the spread of cults’ influence, one must clearly understand the characteristics cults have in common.

“There are several major types of cults in the United States: (1) Neo-Christian religious; (2) Hindu and Eastern religious: (3) Witchcraft and Satanist; (4) Spiritualist: (5) Zen philosophical-mystical orientation; (6) Racial orientation; (7) Flying-saucer phenomena orientation; (8) Political.” (MTS).

…and, more recently: (9) Climate Change; (10) Black Lives Matter; and (11) pro-Palestinian activism.

“The label cult refers to 3 factors: (1) The origin of the group and role of the leader; (2) The power structure or relationship between the leader and the followers; (3) The use of a coordinated program of brainwashing.” (MTS).

… and (4) Indoctrination of our youth by far-left social activists, media and progressive educators in our public schools, universities and other academic institutions.

“Cults and cultic groups normally refer to any one of many groups that have sprung up in our society and that are similar in the way they originate, in their power structure, and in their governance. Cults range from relatively benign to those that exercise extraordinary control over member’s lives and use brainwashing to influence and control members. Cult denotes a group that forms around a person who claims that he or she has a special mission or knowledge, which will be shared with those who turn over most of their decision making to that leader. The process of brainwashing or mind control is the route by which the cult leader gains control.” (MTS).

This process of brainwashing is strikingly like the strategy and information’s manipulation of the far-left media, which is controlled by a powerful elite class (e.g., George Soros and his son).

“Eventually, cult leaders and their most close followers’ subject other members to mind-numbing treatments that block critical and evaluative thinking and subjugate independent choice in a context of a strictly enforced hierarchy. A cult leader’s motivation is to harass, to financially destroy, and to silence criticism. Cult leaders keep the focus of love, devotion, and allegiance on themselves. In many cults, for example, spouses are forced to separate, or parents are forced to give up their children as a test of their devotion to their leader.” (MTS).

As a rule, cult leaders claim to be breaking with a tradition, offering something novel, and instituting the only “viable” system for change that will solve life’s problem or the world’s challenges—e.g., advocating for neo-Marxist ideology, White Privilege doctrine, Critical Race Theory, Black Lives Matter standings and, most recently, anti-Semitic pro-Palestinian movement.

“Cults tend to require members to undergo a major disruption or change in lifestyle. Many cults put great pressure on their members to leave their families, friends, and jobs to become immersed in the group’s major purpose. In this closed system of logic, one is not allowed to question or doubt a tenet, or rule, or call attention to information that suggests some internal contradiction within the belief system, or a contradiction with what one has been.” (MTS).

Indeed, cults very much resembling a totalitarian regime, with a brutal dictator and an “inquisition-type “of justice system in charge of the masses; like the Soviet socialist-style of governing. 

Certainly, the First Amendment of the U.S. Constitution guarantees freedom of speech and beliefs to all citizens. But it also guarantees minors the rights to choose their own ideological and spiritual path. Our educational and legal system should recognize that minors should not be subjected to any forms of intense indoctrination or brainwashing by the far-left progressive educators in our public schools and academic institutions.

“Pro-Palestinian death cult” is attached to the neo-Marxist cause of destroying Western Civilization and the Sate of Israel. The people who spit rage and fury and refuse to think or even see reality are obviously not liberals. They are anti-Western and neo-Marxist radicals.

In terms of Israel, pro-Palestinian activists have fully internalized the destruction of the Jewish state as a mandatory precursor of the larger “revolution” that envision to bring down the Western World. They have no interest in factual truth or diplomatic discussions, or peace resolution; they swim in the sea of “useful idiots,” most of whom are being indoctrinated on college campuses by neo-Marxist academics.

Considering how pro-Palestinian “protests” began even before Israel had a chance to respond to October 7 massacre, these people are not only keffiyeh cultists, but well-organized army funded by far-left neo-Marxist organizations, such as George Soros’ “Freedom Foundation.” Clearly, no far-left propaganda campaign in history rivaled what is sweeping the world today; it is much worse than what George Orwell could have imagined in his novel “1984.”

Certainly, we cannot be expected to contribute to the general good of the humanity at the expense of our committing “collective suicide” and witness a decline of the Judeo-Christian moral values.

Alexander Dolitsky was born and raised in Kiev in the former Soviet Union. He received an M.A. in history from Kiev Pedagogical Institute, Ukraine in 1976; an M.A. in anthropology and archaeology from Brown University in 1983; and enrolled in the Ph.D. program in anthropology at Bryn Mawr College from 1983 to 1985, where he was also lecturer in the Russian Center. In the USSR, he was a social studies teacher for three years and an archaeologist for five years for the Ukrainian Academy of Sciences. In 1978, he settled in the United States. Dolitsky visited Alaska for the first time in 1981, while conducting field research for graduate school at Brown. He then settled first in Sitka in 1985 and then in Juneau in 1986. From 1985 to 1987, he was U.S. Forest Service archaeologist and social scientist. He was an Adjunct Assistant Professor of Russian Studies at the University of Alaska Southeast from 1985 to 1999; Social Studies Instructor at the Alyeska Central School, Alaska Department of Education and Yukon-Koyukuk School District from 1988 to 2006; and Director of the Alaska-Siberia Research Center from 1990 to 2022. From 2006 to 2010, Alexander Dolitsky served as a Delegate of the Russian Federation in the United States for the Russian Compatriots program. He has done 30 field studies in various areas of the former Soviet Union (including Siberia), Central Asia, South America, Eastern Europe and the United States (including Alaska). Dolitsky was a lecturer on the World Discoverer, Spirit of Oceanus, and Clipper Odyssey vessels in the Arctic and Sub-Arctic regions. He was a Project Manager for the WWII Alaska-Siberia Lend Lease Memorial, which was erected in Fairbanks in 2006. Dolitsky has published extensively in the fields of anthropology, history, archaeology and ethnography. His more recent publications include Fairy Tales and Myths of the Bering Strait Chukchi, Ancient Tales of Kamchatka, Tales and Legends of the Yupik Eskimos of Siberia, Old Russia in Modern America: Living Traditions of the Russian Old Believers in Alaska, Allies in Wartime: The Alaska-Siberia Airway During World War II, Spirit of the Siberian Tiger: Folktales of the Russian Far East, Living Wisdom of the Russian Far East: Tales and Legends from Chukotka and Alaska, and Pipeline to Russia: The Alaska-Siberia Air Route in World War II.

Greg Sarber: There Are Two Sides to Every Story

20

By GREG SARBER

Recent events have reminded me that there are two sides to every story and of an interesting historical parallel.

The McDonald’s fast food chain is one of the largest corporations in the United States, with over 40,000 franchise restaurants worldwide and a market capitalization of over $200 billion. However, it wasn’t always this way, and there was a great deal of controversy about how the restaurant chain got started.

The McDonald’s corporation began with a single restaurant founded by two brothers in California back in 1948. Maurice and Richard McDonald founded a restaurant in San Bernardino to sell hamburgers and milkshakes.

They produced food quicker than their competitors and prided themselves on being able to sell it for half the price and in half the time as other restaurants. They called this their Speedee Service System, and credited Henry Ford with the idea, saying they modeled their restaurant after the assembly line that he created for the automobile industry.

The restaurant was so successful that in 1954, the brothers hired an individual named Ray Kroc to help them franchise their business in other locations. Some franchise restaurants were opened over the next 6 years, but the expansion did not proceed as fast as expected since the brothers were more concerned about operating their existing restaurant than managing a corporation.

Kroc saw the potential, and he convinced the brothers to sell him the franchise rights to McDonald’s in 1961. He paid them $2.7 million, which is equivalent to $32.8 million in today’s dollars. The deal allowed them to keep the ownership and operate the original location independent of the new McDonald’s corporation.

The brothers agreed to the deal, which was very favorable for them at the time, given the lack of success of the initial franchise attempts. They were able to get a significant payoff for their efforts. Had Kroc failed, the brothers still retained their original restaurant and were not taking any financial risks in accepting the deal.

Ray Kroc was able to make a rapid expansion of McDonald’s, establishing franchises around the country. As the new corporation became very successful, the brothers began to complain about the terms of the original deal. They alleged that they had a handshake agreement with Kroc to share profits in the new enterprise with them, but he had failed to do so. Kroc’s position was that no such agreement was made, and that he had treated the brothers equitably, complying with the original contract they had agreed to.

It is impossible to say who was right in the matter, but afterwards, there were hard feelings between Kroc and the brothers.

Some people tell the story of the McDonald’s corporation, and portray Ray Kroc as the villain, but it is impossible to say if he did anything wrong. The brothers were well compensated for the deal they signed, and willingly agreed to it. It was only later did they have a case of seller’s remorse. The complaints the brothers made appeared to be a case of sour grapes.

What does this history lesson have to do with anything? Sorry to leave it there and be intentionally vague.

Greg Sarber is a lifelong Alaskan. He is a petroleum engineer who spent his career working on Alaska’s North Slope. Now retired, he lives with his family in Homer, Alaska. Greg serves as a board member of Alaska Gold Communications, Inc., the publisher of Must Read Alaska.

Northern Air Cargo announces launch of a new Seattle to Anchorage route

3

Alaskan businesses and several rural communities are expected to benefit from a new air-cargo route designed to deliver freight more quickly, reliably, and economically.

Northern Air Cargo (NAC) has announced a new direct freight route from Seattle-Tacoma International Airport (SEA) to Ted Stevens Anchorage International Airport (ANC). This service is scheduled to begin the week of October 5, 2025, with flights departing three times a week on Sunday, Tuesday, and Thursday evenings from Seattle. The flights will arrive in Anchorage early the following mornings on Monday, Wednesday, and Friday.

NAC’s route provides same-day freshness by connecting shipments from Seattle directly to its statewide network. The communities of Nome and Kotzebue could receive freight within 12 hours, while Utqiagvik and Bethel may expect deliveries in approximately 18 hours. For southbound shipments, Alaskan businesses, especially those in the fresh seafood industry, will enjoy affordable and timely access to markets in the Pacific Northwest.

In a press release, NAC President Dave Karp stated, “This new route provides our customers with a vital resource,” adding, “We’re offering a tool for businesses and communities to partner with an experienced Alaskan cargo carrier that puts customer service first. Many NAC employees grew up in rural Alaska, so we understand the need.”

NAC’s new service will streamline shipping with a single Air Waybill that covers the entire journey from Seattle to rural communities. Customers will not need to establish an account and can expect support from real people whenever they contact NAC to arrange shipments. Additionally, NAC has a proprietary cold chain system that is climate-controlled and specifically designed for transporting essential items such as groceries and healthcare supplies.

For more information, click the link below to view a copy of the press release.

NAC Press Release: Fresh. Fast. Alaska Bound!

Bob Bird: The Blood of Martyrs

32

By BOB BIRD

The Church’s foundation is built upon the blood of martyrs. So said Tertullian, in the 2nd Century. It converted not only the pagan Roman Empire, but also, much later, the Norsemen.

The unintentional martyrdoms have already begun, in Nashville and Minneapolis. It comes because the teachings of religious institutions of authentic Christianity are well known, and therefore angers those who have been victims, not of Christianity, but of the unnatural values of a soulless and hopeless culture.

That is what I wrote in my last column. What I meant by “unintentional” martyrs were the innocent children killed in Nashville and Minneapolis, like the children devoured by lions in the Roman era. They were killed because their parents were bearing witness to Christ, themselves too young to fully understand what they were dying for. They were in Christian education because of the love their parents had for them, as they were only beginning to learn what it meant to be a Christian.

But now we have an authentic martyr, Charlie Kirk. He did not die because he wanted to, but because he loved his enemies, and considered them worth the risk for the sake of their eternal souls.

The word “martyr” means “witness”, and this man was bearing witness to Christ, overtly, persistently, charitably … and annoyingly. The word “annoying” usually means that someone was getting under the skin of someone else, and bears the blame because of their personality.

But not so fast. The Pharisees and the Romans found Jesus overt, persistent, charitable … and annoying. That His was the most perfect life ever lived meant that He was annoying not because of a whiny voice or abrasive personality, but because He proclaimed the Truth.

All Christians are called to perform An Imitation of Christ.  The Thomas à Kempis classic booklet by that name is still as popular as ever. Charlie Kirk’s “crime” was to imitate Christ. He waded right into hostile territory and had the cost counted beforehand. Very likely he had discussed the possibility with his wife of someday being a victim of murder.

Riley Gaines had faced an overt and dangerous hostility simply for declaring the most glaring and obvious truth about being a woman. Locked inside a “safe room” for hours, her life was endangered every moment that she dared to speak at San Francisco State. That she came away with only minor physical harm does not diminish her courage.   

An excerpt from Kempis is quite telling:

My son, thou art never secure in this life. As long as thou livest, thou hast need of spiritual arms. Thou art in the midst of enemies, and are assaulted on the right hand and the left.

Moreover, if thou dost not fix thy heart on me with a sincere will to suffer all things for my sake, thou canst not support the heat of this warfare, nor attain the victory of the saints.

Thus wrote author Kempis, who although spoke fictionally on behalf of Christ, certainly was inspired to capture the very essence of self-denial and … martyrdom.

But now let us take Christ’s very words as applying to our times:

 “Blessed are you when people insult you, persecute you and falsely say all kinds of evil against you because of me. Rejoice and be glad, because great is your reward in heaven, for in the same way they persecuted the prophets who were before you.

“You are the salt of the earth. But if the salt loses its saltiness, how can it be made salty again? It is no longer good for anything, except to be thrown out and trampled underfoot.

“You are the light of the world. A town built on a hill cannot be hidden. Neither do people light a lamp and put it under a bowl. Instead they put it on its stand, and it gives light to everyone in the house. In the same way, let your light shine before others, that they may see your good deeds and glorify your Father in heaven.’

Charlie Kirk embodied this godly advice, and waded fearlessly into the very nest of trouble. Yet he did not scold, he engaged. He reminded his adversaries that, like him, they bore the image and likeness of God, and thus deserved respect — a respect that they often did not return.

It did not matter. Christ did not say to go hide if things got ugly. Christ first delivered His unpopular messages, and then withdrew — to pray and rest elsewhere — until His time was fulfilled.

Kirk was in mid-sentence, delivering a message, when the Crown of Martyrdom was awarded him — likely by a professional assassin, acting on behalf of the Deep State.

I recall a political cartoon from 1968, from the immortal Bill Mauldin, after Martin Luther King was cut down by an assassin. King had his flaws which are still largely suppressed by courtier historians, but his message was godly. Mahatma Gandhi also was a flawed human being, but was also senselessly murdered. I do believe that what I heard from a Christian pundit, embodies Mauldin’s cartoon. He said, “A million new Charlie Kirks were created today.”

Bob Bird is former chair of the Alaskan Independence Party and the host of a talk show on KSRM radio, Kenai.

Jon Faulkner: Why Senator Robb Myers is Right About the Permanent Fund

25

By JON FAULKNER

Joshua Church is likely a great investment advisor. His writing is clear. But his rebuttal to Senator Myers fails to account for several core expectations Alaskans have of their elected representatives.  

First among these addresses why Alaskans created the Permanent Fund in the first place: to prevent the legislature from robbing every penny of revenue from the people. Alaskans are tired of our wealth being squandered. Inadequte inflation proofing is a prime example.    

 Second, Mr. Church ignores the majority of Alaskan’s desire—and defensible right–to a FULL PFD under the original statutory formula.

Third, he dismisses a vital concept underpinning the Permanent Fund. It is not an endowment belonging to a board of money managers or to Government. It is a sovereign wealth fund deriving from, and serving the interests of, all Alaskans.  

These ideas need to sink in. Those who oppose these concepts use all manner of deception to obtain control over the Permanent Fund. It is time to shine a bright light on our elected officials and the factions who influence them.   

Alaskans need to know Governor Jay Hammond’s purpose for creating the Fund.  Youth need to read Governor Walter J. Hickel’s book “Who Owns America?” to understand that our citizens are sovereign entities whom he described as shareholders in an “Owner-State”. Native sovereignty and land claims derive from an identical proposition: That government of, by and for the people does not own our resources, or decide by its ultimate authority our rights. Such rights and titles derive from the people whom government serves. Government is not the originator of sovereignty; it is the custodian and protector of it.

The concept of taking annually a “percent of market value” (PMV) sounds wonderful to politicians who want more of our hard-earned income. But recent history proves it doesn’t work. The simple truth is that the concept obligates the people to pay out money for government that it may not have.

Historic market returns may indeed be net positive over time, but a policy based on a certainty that our economy will grow and average a fixed return is dangerous. Who among us takes—regardless of our annual income—a fixed percent of our total wealth annually to fund our living expenses? This concept is a ruse to spend more money than we should.  

Alaskans embrace sustainability—especially our youth who inherit the future , and our Native brethren who rely on the land.   And yet, nothing is sustainable about POMV and our current level of spending. Contrast POMV with the original statutory formula for the PFD that is 100% sustainable because it takes for dividends only 50% of what was actually “earned” from only 25% of natural resource revenues. This equates to a 12.5% royalty on our income—a formula used by oil and gas producers to pay land owners that has proven sustainable for 100 years. 

Once Alaskans understand the simple–who is taking from whom, how and why—other things become clear. Those who wish to protect the Fund and the original PFD want to keep two accounts—the constitutionally protected Principal and the separate Earnings Reserve Account (ERA). Senator Myers is right that merging them into one account weakens legislative safeguards and invites overspending.

Those who wish to syphon 100% of fund earnings into government generally favor merging the two accounts, bypassing legislative compromise, and avoiding budget cuts.   

Alaska’s youth and Native community should wake up to this systematic pillaging by the Legislature of the Permanent Fund Dividend. Back only candidates for office who promise to protect Hammond’s unprecedented gift to all future generations.

The same greed that robs Alaskans of their royalty share fuels the impulse of politicians to spend at unwise and unsustainable levels. This is already eroding our democracy, our middle class and free enterprise.  

The argument that our Permanent Fund doesn’t function like most “model” endowments or trusts misses the point completely. This is OUR money—the peoples fund. We accept the uncertainty that opposition party politics provides. We accept fluctuating dividends. What we don’t accept is duplicity, and select power-brokers, funded by unions, undermining the will of the people. Alaskan’s PFD is being re-directed into wasteful programs and entitlements that undermine our economy.  Politicians complain about revenue uncertainty and “last minute” budgeting. And yet, few embrace forward-based budgeting based on proven income—which, were politicians serious about it—could be easily structured.

The majority of Alaskans embrace a “hands off” policy for the Fund, and full dividends, and yet our representatives reject a popular vote on these issues. Unions intervene to frustrate the will of Alaskans.  We should question those who favor RCV-like referendums, fueled by outside money, but who deny Alaskans a voice in their own Permanent Fund.

To address Mr. Church’s conclusions directly:     

Concern 1: “The Fund hasn’t been managed well enough to deserve more trust.”
This is not a separate issue; this is the main issue. The Board needs to hold open meetings and feel accountable to all Alaskans.  

Concern 2: “A 5% draw is too high.”
Most Alaskans agree, but the reality is, there is no completely “safe” number. Being conservative means basing Fund draws—and the PFD—on actual earnings.

Concern 3: “We should only spend earnings, not principal.”
As to Mr. Church’s chicken and eggs analogy: First, live on only the eggs the chickens lay each month. Next, grow more chickens; finally, never eat more chickens than are necessary to sustain your egg diet.   Further, there is no “outdated” method of investing. Alaskans want to limit spending by government, and not unduly restrict Fund managers from investing in the long term.   

Senator Myers is right. Mr. Church’s prescription will cut the dividend and the value of the corpus, and lead to more government spending because legislative checks and compromise will be removed.    

Jon Faulkner is the president of Alaska Gold Communications, the parent company of Must Read Alaska.

BREAKING: New Alaska AG Cites “Compelled Speech” as Basis For Objection to Chugach Plan

11

Alaska’s new Attorney General, Stephen Cox, asked the Regulatory Commission of Alaska today to intervene on behalf of Chugach Electric Association (CEA) ratepayers in the matter of Chugach’s new “Cents of Community” program.

Although fewer than ten percent of Chugach’s members proactively opted into the program, the rollout automatically signed up all 90,000 members and then required members to take additional steps to opt out.  Such requirements cannot substitute for positive affirmation, according to the AG.  

Cox asked the RCA to force CEA to redesign the program to avoid violations of constitutional rights.

“This is a compelled-subsidy problem,” said Attorney General Cox. “Because Chugach’s members are captive customers, the automatic round-up requires them to fund speech they may not agree with. That raises serious First Amendment concerns. Alaskans should not be put in the position of supporting organizations or advocacy they disagree with just to keep the lights on.”

A press release issued by the Dept. of Law cites the Janus v. AFSCME case as authority supporting the RCA request, which “makes clear that compelled subsidies of private speech are inconsistent with the First Amendment and that opt-out mechanisms do not cure the problem”

 One element of the controversial plan is CEA’s yet-to-be disclosed plan on who will manage CEA’s newly formed Charitable Foundation, and how proceeds in the Trust will be distributed.  Ratepayers are thus deprived of information to make an informed decision. According to Cox, this could lead to ratepayers subsidizing undisclosed causes they do not support.

“Protecting Alaskans’ First Amendment rights is central here,” AG Cox said. “Voluntary generosity is commendable, but giving should be a matter of choice. Opt-in programs like Anchorage Water and Wastewater Utility’s ‘Coins Can Count’ show that member donations can be encouraged without compromising individual rights.”  

Chugach retains the option to re-design the program voluntarily, or to risk RCA action to compel such a move. According to Chief Assistant Attorney General Jeffrey Waller, a lead attorney for the Regulatory Affairs & Public Advocacy Section,  RAPA has historically opposed automatic enrollment programs by utilities.

Here is the link to the full filing:  https://law.alaska.gov/pdf/press/250910-Comment.pdf

Jon Faulkner is the president of Alaska Gold Communications, the parent company of Must Read Alaska.

Joshua Church: Why Senator Robb Myers is Wrong About the Permanent Fund

25

By JOSHUA CHURCH | Investment Adviser Representative, Arbor Capital Management

I like Senator Robb Myers. He cares about Alaska and he’s thoughtful about policy. But on the Permanent Fund, he’s wrong.

Robb argues we should keep two accounts—the constitutionally protected Principal and the separate Earnings Reserve Account (ERA)—because that structure supposedly creates a “hard floor” of protection. He says merging them into one account would weaken safeguards and tempt the Legislature to overspend.

Here’s the truth: merging the accounts, with a constitutional Percent of Market Value (POMV) rule, would actually make the Fund stronger, more efficient, and better protected.

Right now, Alaska manages the Permanent Fund in a way that almost no serious endowment or trust in the world does. We keep “earnings” in a side account, separate from the principal, and let the Legislature draw directly from that pot. This creates uncertainty. Because lawmakers don’t know how much they’ll need until the last minute, fund managers are forced to keep billions in short-term, low-yield holdings to cover potential withdrawals. That drag reduces long-term returns and prevents the Fund from growing as much as it could.

In money management, this is the opposite of best practice. Many major endowment—from Ivy League universities to the largest sovereign wealth funds—use a single-fund model. All assets remain invested together in one pool, and a fixed percentage is withdrawn each year. That structure allows the portfolio to stay fully invested, which maximizes compounding returns over decades. It also stabilizes withdrawals so policymakers can budget with confidence.

This isn’t theory—it’s how the most successful funds in the world operate. Commonwealth North, Alaska’s most respected nonpartisan civic group, studied the issue in detail and unanimously recommended merging the accounts into one endowment with a fixed, constitutionally protected draw of 4–5% per year.

Still, some Alaskans are understandably cautious about change. Let’s take their concerns seriously.

Concern 1: “The Fund hasn’t been managed well enough to deserve more trust.”
That’s a separate issue and if the fund isn’t managed well enough than the legislature needs to hire new managers and do a better job on their reviews. This reform doesn’t give up accountability. In fact, it adds more structure. A single-account model removes the guesswork, locks withdrawals to a predictable rule, and allows managers to focus on long-term growth instead of short-term liquidity. And nothing prevents us from demanding stronger oversight or performance reviews. Those are separate conversations.

Concern 2: “A 5% draw is too high.”
I agree. While 5% may be nice, it’s aggressive if we want to protect long-term value. A safer number is 4% to 4.5%. That’s still high enough to support services and the dividend, but conservative enough to ensure the Fund’s purchasing power is preserved for future generations.

Concern 3: “We should only spend earnings, not principal.”
This one sound sensible, but it reflects an outdated view of investing. Many of the best investments today—think Apple or Amazon—don’t pay large dividends. Their value comes from growth, not “earnings.” By contrast, companies like Ford or Sears returned plenty of dividends but delivered far less wealth over time. Limiting ourselves to only what shows up as “earnings” is like tying one hand behind our back.

A better way to think about it is like a farmer with chickens and a cornfield. Should he only live on the eggs the chickens lay each month? Or should he also plan for the annual harvest, budgeting carefully so it lasts until the next season? The Permanent Fund works the same way. With smart management, we can responsibly draw a small, fixed percent of the Fund’s total value each year, regardless of whether those returns are labeled “earnings” or not.

This reform doesn’t cut the dividend. It doesn’t grow government. What it does is modernize the Fund, align it with global best practices, and lock in protections that keep politicians from raiding “extra” cash.

A unified endowment model brings three benefits:

  • More reliable growth – less idle cash, more strategic investing.
  • Stable, predictable budgeting – lawmakers can plan with greater confidence.
  • Stronger long-term protections – the Fund stays intact and continues to grow.

The Permanent Fund is Alaska’s crown jewel. We owe it to future generations to manage it wisely. Fear of change should not keep us from making improvements that every other successful endowment in the world already uses.

I respect Robb, but on this one, he’s wrong. Merging the accounts under a constitutional draw rule won’t weaken the Fund—it’s the best way to protect it for decades to come.