Monday, November 10, 2025
Home Blog Page 13

Alaska Legislative Council allocates $100,000 of taxpayer funds to sue Gov. Dunleavy over Ag Dept. Executive Order

14

By BRENDA JOSEPHSON

The Alaska Legislative Council voted 9-2 on September 10th to allocate up to $100,000 to fund a lawsuit challenging Governor Mike Dunleavy’s executive order to establish Department of Agriculture.

Rep. Chuck Kopp (R-Anchorage) and Rep. Mike Prax (R-North Pole) were the only members of the council to oppose the lawsuit, with Prax arguing that the legal basis for it is weak and advocating dialogue with the governor instead of pursuing litigation.

The controversy began on December 20, 2024, when Dunleavy announced executive order 136 to elevate the Division of Agriculture—currently within the Department of Natural Resources—into a cabinet-level agency to bolster Alaska’s food security. The order, would have moved current staff and budgets to the new agency starting July 1, 2025.

In March 2025, lawmakers voted 32-28 to reject the order, citing concerns over costs and a lack of legislative input.

Dunleavy reintroduced the order during an August 2025 special session, prompting objections from legislative leaders. In a letter dated August 29, 2025, Senate President Gary Stevens and House Speaker Bryce Edgmon argued that it was a violation of constitutional rules to resubmit a rejected order, especially in a special session focused on education funding.

The governor’s office has not directly addressed the letter, stating only on September 10, “The governor’s position remains unchanged.”

The council’s vote authorizes hiring legal counsel, with Stoel Rives, a firm with an Anchorage office, as the likely choice, pending contract approval. The lawsuit aims to clarify whether Dunleavy can implement the order by treating legislative inaction as approval.

Rep. Prax, one of the dissenters, opposed the lawsuit based on his interpretation of Alaska’s Constitution: A Citizen’s Guide, which he shared with council members in a memo. Citing Article III, Section 23, Prax emphasized the provision’s “plain language,” which states that the legislature has 60 days during a regular session or the entirety of a shorter special session to disapprove an executive order.

Prax contended that the lawsuit’s premise—that reintroducing a rejected executive order in a special session is unconstitutional—is on “shaky ground.” His argument is that the constitution addresses special sessions differently, permitting disapproval only within the 30-day duration and scope of that session.

The August special session focused on education, which leads Prax to believe that the governor’s reintroduction does not violate the constitution; it does not explicitly prohibit resubmission across different types of sessions. The guide shows that this rule, based on the federal Reorganization Act of 1932, generally benefits the governor by making it easier to reorganize without needing a complete legislative bill.

When reached for comment, Rep. Prax emphasized a collaborative approach, stating, “It would be much better if we worked this issue out by talking to the governor and not in a court suit.” He expressed concern that litigation escalates tensions unnecessarily when negotiations could resolve the dispute, aligning with his view that the constitutional ambiguity might not favor the legislature’s case.

Rep. Kopp, the other dissenter, argued that the administration appeared to have paused its push for the department outside legislative channels, suggesting the lawsuit could be premature.

Alaska, one of only two states without a dedicated agriculture department, has two stalled legislative bills to create one through standard processes.

Brenda Josephson is a board member of Alaska Gold Communications, Inc., the publisher of Must Read Alaska. You can contact her via email at [email protected].

The University of Alaska Board of Regents Proposes Cutting Affirmative Action Language for Merit-Based Hiring

20

By BRENDA JOSEPHSON

The University of Alaska (UA) Board of Regents has proposed revisions to Regents’ Policy 04.02, which would eliminate affirmative action language to align with federal mandates and emphasize merit-based hiring. The board introduced these changes during its meeting in Juneau on September 5-6. The revisions aim to ensure fairness and compliance while securing access to essential federal funding.

The current Regents’ Policy 04.02 commits the university to equal employment opportunity and outlines an affirmative action program designed to recruit and promote “protected classes.” It mandates that major administrative units develop their own affirmative action programs and appoint affirmative action officers to oversee and monitor progress. 

The proposed amendments would eliminate these provisions and introduce a clear focus on “merit-based advancement opportunities” and “equal opportunities and access in employment to all individuals, free from any unlawful discrimination based on legally protected status.” The role of “affirmative action officer” would be changed to “human resources officer,” indicating a move toward more streamlined and impartial hiring practices.

This move is in response to a January 2025 executive order from President Donald Trump, which rescinded Executive Order 11246, a 1965 mandate that required federal contractors to implement affirmative action programs. By aligning with Trump’s federal directive, UA seeks to protect millions in federal grants that are essential to its operations.

In a news release, the university claims that the elimination of affirmative action language will not change its practices. The release states, “As a practical matter, if adopted by the board in November, the policy updates will not result in changes to UA’s current hiring or admission practices, which remain consistent with long-standing federal guidance barring discrimination.”

This development builds on other changes in 2025 that updated university practices. In February, the board voted to eliminate diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) terminology from websites, publications, and job titles, a move that clarified UA’s commitment to fairness and compliance with federal expectations.

In June, further updates eliminated references to “affirmative action” in favor of language that emphasizes equal access and merit. These modifications, reviewed alongside updates to public records policies during the September meeting, demonstrate an effort to keep UA competitive and financially secure.

The proposed revisions, presented as a first reading, are scheduled for a final vote in November. University officials emphasize that these updates will safeguard UA against potential funding losses while strengthening a hiring process that prioritizes qualifications over quotas. This approach reflects a broader national trend toward policies that emphasize individual merit, ensuring fairness and opportunity.

For more details on the policy revisions and board activities, visit alaska.edu/bor.

Brenda Josephson is a board member of Alaska Gold Communications, Inc., the publisher of Must Read Alaska. You can contact her via email at [email protected].

Palmer Gathers for Charlie Kirk Vigil at Church on the Rock

9

By BRENDA JOSEPHSON

Community members filled the Palmer Church on the Rock for a vigil honoring Charlie Kirk, the late founder of Turning Point USA and a notable conservative activist. The event, organized by the Republican Party and local pastors with considerable assistance from Rep. Cathy Tilton, emphasized Kirk’s significant impact on faith, truth, and civic engagement.

The vigil, which took place without music or food, filled the church’s sanctuary to capacity, leaving only standing room available. Overflow attendees gathered in the lobby and outside to pay their respects. The evening fostered a spirit of unity and introspection, as attendees prayed for strength, protection, and the ongoing faith revival that Kirk passionately advocated.

Palmer Church of the Rock Lobby during the vigil

Local pastors, Vic Fonov, Josh O’Donnell, Joelle Sanchez, and Patrick Napier delivered heartfelt remarks that emphasized Kirk’s dedication to sharing his faith and promoting conservative values.

Several legislators were present, including Reps. Rauscher, McCabe, Tilton, Underwood, and Johnson, along with Sen. Shower and Mat-Su assembly member Dimitri Fonov. Alaska Republican Party Chair Carmela Warfield addressed the crowd, sharing messages of hope and resilience.

Alaska governor candidate Adam Crum captured the significance of the event by stating, “The overwhelming support that showed up clearly demonstrates that Charlie Kirk’s impact cannot be overstated. Almost 1,000 people came together to pray for strength, protection, and the ongoing faith revival across our nation. In this way, we honor Charlie, who devoted his life to spreading the Gospel and truth.”

Josh Hanson, Vice Chair of ARP District 25, shared his thoughts: “It was good to see the community come together in the face of online criticism to honor Charlie Kirk, a person of deep faith and conviction, who made significant contributions to the conservative movement. I hope Charlie’s life inspires us as Christians and especially members of the Alaska Republican Party to boldly and courageously stand for the truth and our values.”

Senator Shelley Hughes, who was unable to attend due to her travels in Israel, sent her campaign coordinator to represent her at the vigil. In a statement shared on Facebook, Hughes expressed her condolences, stating, “My heart goes out to his dear wife and sweet children for this unjustified tragedy. I hope that, as his legacy, we can follow the path he modeled, emphasizing civil discourse and critical thinking skills, regardless of where individuals fall on the political spectrum.”

Pastor Josh O’Donnell offered words of consolation and encouragement, stating, “Evil didn’t win this week. While we grieve the heartbreaking loss of one of the most faithful, courageous, and brilliant Christians we’ve ever had the privilege to witness in this generation… Evil didn’t win. This hateful act may seem like a victory for darkness, but we already see it sparking a fire within countless others, inspiring them to rise up tenfold in his passion for Jesus and this nation.”

The vigil, largely organized through the dedicated efforts of Rep. Cathy Tilton, served as a poignant reminder of Kirk’s significant influence. Alaskans came together, filling every available space, to mourn his loss and commit to advancing his mission of promoting truth and unity.

Brenda Josephson is a board member of Alaska Gold Communications, Inc., the publisher of Must Read Alaska. You can contact her via email at [email protected].

Greg Sarber: Charlie Kirk – American Martyr

9

By GREG SARBER

It has taken me a couple of days to gather my thoughts on the assassination of Charlie Kirk.  After giving it some consideration, I believe that the radical left will very much regret this man’s death.

In the immediate aftermath of his assassination, a few left-wing ghouls expressed joy that Mr. Kirk had died.  The leftist blogosphere had some insane commentary, some blaming Charlie for his own murder, some inexplicably blaming President Trump, saying that the president’s previous comments amounted to a threat that forced a violent left-wing response.  Only an individual possessed by evil can take joy in another man’s assassination, and by blaming conservatives for the acts of violence committed against them, the leftists are making twists of logic that only a Democrat could understand. 

However, Charlie Kirk’s death may become an inflection point in history that will not stop his message; it will work to make the ideas he supported more powerful than ever.  Two historical examples illustrate why.

The first example is from the book of Acts in the Bible.  Stephen, who is an Apostle of Jesus in the early church, is described as having wisdom and an ability to speak so compellingly that his opponents couldn’t win an argument against him.  Stephen sounds a lot like Charlie Kirk.  Stephen was considered a threat and was condemned to death by stoning.  Stephen is considered the very first Christian martyred for his faith.  As he was about to die, Stephen prayed for forgiveness for his executioners. 

One man present at his execution was Saul, who was a Pharisee and an avid persecutor of Christians. Soon after the execution, Saul left for Damascus, where he encountered Jesus on the road and underwent a profound transformation in his beliefs, changing his name from Saul to Paul. He became one of the most important members of the church and a man who spread Christianity throughout much of the known world.  We would not have a Christian church today were it not for Paul.  Who knows how witnessing Stephen’s execution affected him?  Perhaps Stephen’s death was God’s plan in action, and perhaps Charlie’s death is also part of God’s plan, in ways that we cannot comprehend right now.

There is also the example of Abraham Lincoln after the Civil War.  Before he was assassinated, Lincoln had proposed a generous and non-punitive plan to return the former Confederate states speedily to the United States.  His magnanimity demonstrates that when a celebration was held at the end of the war, Lincoln asked the band to play the southern anthem, Dixie, to honor the southern troops that had fought so gallantly. 

However, it was not to be.  Four days later, Southern sympathizer John Wilkes Booth assassinated Lincoln, and the path of Reconstruction changed radically.   The American public was outraged and angered at the South for this act of betrayal.  They demanded collective accountability for all southern states because of the act of one lone assassin.  The new president, Andrew Johnson, decided that the South should be punished for seceding from the Union and famously remarked that, “Treason is a crime and must be…made infamous, and traitors must be impoverished.”  He accomplished all of that and more.  The South was occupied by Union troops for over a decade and endured much more onerous terms than they would have received had Lincoln lived. 

Charlie Kirk’s death may inspire something similar to these two historical examples.  Some on the left may not want to be associated with radicals willing to kill their political opponents and may turn away from them like Saul did.  Or perhaps, like in Lincoln’s example, the resolve of the country may harden against the political left.  Maybe the public will demand justice and accountability, and reject any politician sympathetic to their radical leftist agenda.  It might become unfashionable to support the delusional woke ideas the left has been feeding us.

Kirk’s assassination may accomplish just the opposite of what his murderer intended.  Instead of stopping him, maybe his death will hasten the spread of Kirk’s ideas.  They would have been far better off by listening to what Charlie had to say instead of killing him.   

Greg Sarber is a lifelong Alaskan. He is a petroleum engineer who spent his career working on Alaska’s North Slope. Now retired, he lives with his family in Homer, Alaska. Greg serves as a board member of Alaska Gold Communications, Inc., the publisher of Must Read Alaska.

Yukon Quest Alaska unveils 750-Mile all-Alaska Route for 2026 Dog Sled Race

4

The Yukon Quest will return to long-distance racing in 2026 with a new 750-mile route that will be entirely in Alaska’s rugged Interior. On September 11, Yukon Quest Alaska announced the details of the course. The traditional 1,000-mile international route from Fairbanks to Whitehorse, Yukon, last took place in 2020, marking the first long race since then. This announcement has sparked excitement among mushers, fans, and adventure enthusiasts for the event scheduled for February 2026.

In 2025, the Yukon Quest sled dog race featured two distinct, shorter races instead of the traditional 1,000-mile international course. On the Canadian side, the Yukon Quest 450 consisted of a 425-mile loop that began and ended in Teslin, Yukon. Several Checkpoints, including one as far north as Faro, were part of the route. Additionally, the Yukon Quest Alaska hosted a 250-mile race that ran from Fairbanks to Tok, Alaska. Full recaps and standings are available at www.yukonquest.com and www.yukonquestalaska.com.

The 2026 Yukon Quest will feature a circular trail that starts and ends in Fairbanks. This course will showcase Alaska’s stunning wilderness and its historic mushing communities. Spanning 750 miles, the route will include checkpoints that are spaced far apart, such as Nenana, Tanana, Rampart, Beaver, Fort Yukon, Circle, Central, and Two Rivers. Organizers designed the route to honor the legacy of sled dogs while also addressing contemporary challenges, such as warmer winters, which have made traditional paths less dependable due to ice conditions on rivers and lakes.

In addition to the main event, Yukon Quest Alaska will also host its 80-mile Fun Run. This race is designed for novices and aims to help participants develop new skills while promoting community involvement.

Details regarding checkpoints, required gear, and race rules are still being finalized, with updates expected soon. The organization has emphasized its commitment to ensuring the safety of mushers, their 14-dog teams, and volunteers.

Since 1984, the Yukon Quest has gained international popularity for testing the endurance and athleticism of both humans and dogs. The organization established this event to honor the Klondike Gold Rush and the crucial role sled dogs played. Unlike other races, the Quest requires mushers to be self-sufficient, as they must carry all their gear and food across vast, frozen terrains, often in frigid temperatures that can plummet to -50°F.

Mushers are preparing for what is expected to be a challenging race, with a prize pool that has historically exceeded $100,000 for the top finishers. Fans can follow the action through live GPS tracking, leaderboards, and updates on social media. Fairbanks will be the ideal location for spectators to watch in person, as it hosts both the start and finish lines.

If you want to stay up-to-date, you can find news on the Facebook page for Yukon Quest Alaska. More information will soon be available at www.yukonquestalaska.com.

Brenda Josephson is a board member of Alaska Gold Communications, Inc., the publisher of Must Read Alaska. You can contact her via email at [email protected].

Ben Carpenter: A Turning Point for This Generation – After Charlie Kirk’s Assassination, What Comes Next?

24

By BEN CARPENTER

I remember exactly where I was on the morning of the September 11 attacks. I was in college in Utah, watching the second plane hit the World Trade Center. The air was thick with shock, fear, and uncertainty—but what came next was unity. We rallied. We chose to stand together.

This week, I watched the assassination of Charlie Kirk unfold in real time. The shock felt familiar, but the national reaction did not. Instead of unity, I saw division and even celebration from some corners of the internet. This was not just the killing of a man. It was the moment many Americans confronted real, naked evil for the first time. And unlike 9/11, it has left us fractured, not united.

The First Real Encounter With Evil

For older generations, national trauma—political assassinations, civil unrest, terrorist attacks—is horrific but familiar. They remember the killings of John F. Kennedy, Robert F. Kennedy, and Martin Luther King Jr. My generation, Gen X, watched 9/11 and went to fight in Iraq and Afghanistan.

But for many Millennials and Gen Z Americans, the most “traumatic” collective event until now was the COVID-19 pandemic—fearful, but not violent. They had never seen evil strike in real time, in public view, aimed at someone they admired.

The footage of Charlie Kirk’s assassination was not just shocking—it was visceral and morally offensive. It forced millions to watch the extinguishing of a human life up close. It shattered assumptions about the safety of public discourse and the sanctity of life.

Charlie Kirk was their contemporary. To watch him cut down on screen was, for many, their first visceral taste of real evil. And that matters. As C.S. Lewis observed, every choice shapes who we become. How this generation responds to its first confrontation with evil will shape not just its future, but its soul.

The Rise of an “Assassination Culture”

Months before his death, Kirk warned of what he called an “assassination culture.” He cited data from the Network Contagion Research Institute (NCRI), which tracks ideologically motivated threats.

NCRI found rising glorification of political violence, growing tolerance for assassination attempts, and a disturbing normalization of violent rhetoric. One of their studies showed that 48% of self-identified liberals justified violence against Elon Musk and 55% against Donald Trump. After the assassination of a healthcare CEO earlier this year, online searches for “assassination tools” spiked 300%.

After Kirk’s death, NCRI’s director Joel Finkelstein told Newsweek that the killing reflected the exact warning signs they had identified—and that what was once taboo has become acceptable.

That is chilling. A culture that tolerates assassination is not just sick—it is on the verge of collapse.

The Real Crisis Is Moral Decay

But political violence is not the root problem. It is a symptom.

The deeper crisis is moral decay—a collapse of the spiritual foundation that once held our culture together. We live in a time when vengeance is celebrated, self-gratification trumps self-sacrifice, and too many Americans see politics as warfare rather than stewardship.

Our founders understood this danger. In 1798, John Adams wrote, “Our Constitution was made only for a moral and religious people. It is wholly inadequate to the government of any other.” He was right.

No law, no executive order, no regulation, and no police force can hold together our nation that has abandoned God. The collapse we are witnessing is cultural, not legal or regulatory—and it will not be fixed by legal or regulatory means.

The only path back is to once again become a moral and religious people: to fear God, to obey God, and to place Him first in our homes and in our hearts.

Rejecting Evil, Choosing Virtue

That means the responsibility is ours—personally and collectively.

We must lead our families and communities in reverence for God. We must teach our children His commandments and model what it means to live under His authority. We must put the needs of others ahead of our own and choose the narrow path of obedience when the world tempts us toward vengeance or self-interest.

Do not look to Washington, D.C. or your state legislature to heal this country. They can’t. Only God can. And He will—if we repent and return to Him.

Otherwise, the alternative is unthinkable: a future where might makes right, where those with the most guns or the loudest mobs rule, where our children inherit a country defined by vengeance instead of virtue.

A Rallying Cry for a Generation

Charlie Kirk was right to name his organization Turning Point USA. Because this truly is a turning point.

We can either descend further into moral chaos—or we can honor Kirk’s legacy by rejecting violence and embracing virtue. We can choose to fight evil not with more evil, but with faith, with courage, and with selfless leadership.

If this generation can make that choice, if it can rise to this moment, then Charlie Kirk’s death will not be the spark of collapse. It will be the spark of renewal.

Let this be our turning point, let it be toward courage, not chaos—and toward morality, not murder.

Ben Carpenter is a former Alaska state legislator, combat veteran, small business owner, and host of the Must Read Alaska Show.

Fat Bear Week 2025: Katmai’s Bears Prepare for Alaska’s Beloved Wildlife Showdown

3

The brown bears of Katmai National Park and Preserve are bulking up, and the world is eagerly watching as preparations for Fat Bear Week 2025 ramp up. This annual celebration, taking place from September 23 to September 30, invites fans from around the globe to vote for the chubbiest bear, ultimately crowning the champion of pre-hibernation weight gain. The National Park Service, along with explore.org, organizes this wildlife spectacle.

Fat Bear Week showcases the incredible transformation of bears as they indulge in salmon from the Brooks River, gaining weight to prepare for the long Alaskan winter. Live webcams streaming from Brooks Falls allow viewers to observe fan favorites such as Otis, Grazer, and Chunk as they fish and pack on the pounds. The event features a bracket-style tournament in which the bears compete head-to-head for public votes. The structure of the tournament is expected to be announced in late September, generating excitement across social media platforms like X.

You can join the fun and tune in to live bear cams and cast votes through official channels:

Katmai National Park Website: www.nps.gov/katm – Offers event details, bear profiles, and voting instructions. Webcams can be viewed at this link: Katmai Fat Bear Webcams

Explore.org, offers bear profiles and detailed instructions for voting.

Fat Bear Week page: https://explore.org/fat-bear-week. This page includes live webcams, updates on the tournament bracket, and options for interactive voting.

Voting is free and open to all, with ballots typically submitted online during the weeklong event. The 2025 lineup will showcase both experienced contenders and exciting newcomers, sparking enthusiasm on social media about who will win this year’s title.

As preparations progress, Katmai officials urge fans to participate early by watching the live cameras and sharing their favorite bear moments on social media.

For the latest updates, visit

 www.nps.gov/katm or www.explore.org/fat-bear-week. Join the conversation on X to support your favorite bear, and stay tuned for the upcoming bracket reveal to see which bear will be crowned the fattest of 2025.

Brenda Josephson is a board member of Alaska Gold Communications, Inc., the publisher of Must Read Alaska. You can contact her via email at [email protected].

The Rest of the Story

60

By JON FAULKNER

Journalism is tough business. There is always, as Paul Harvey made famous, the “rest of the story”.

The transition of Suzanne Downing from Must Read Alaska has generated speculation about the cause and the future direction of our platform.  Our readers deserve a complete explanation.

Foremost, Suzanne Downing is one of the most talented and accomplished journalists of our age. By any metric, she has accomplished what few have or ever will. Her work has profoundly impacted Alaska and has advanced the conservative cause.

Upon purchase by AGCI in November 2023, Must Read transitioned management from a single person to a corporate board. Every investor shared the same purpose: preserve a free and uncensored press; support Suzanne and provide a “glidepath” for her retirement at a time of her choosing; grow the platform; and ensure its sustainability.

At that time, Suzanne wanted more time with her ailing mother and some monetization of her lifetime of effort. It was uncertain how long she would continue.

MRAK’s board is diverse, consisting of men and women with reputations for success and expertise in their fields.   It is a fully empowered and functioning board, dedicated to a free and independent press. Trust exists among us because we take the time to debate and build consensus. It is impossible, not to mention supreme folly, to hide the truth in such a setting. It is equally true that seven people are not going to risk their personal integrity to engage in deception. We are all Alaskans who care deeply about our state.

So, what exactly happened on Sunday, September 7th, that caused Suzanne’s resignation?

The answer is, shockingly, very little. That Suzanne had been preparing to move on is evident from her owns words, her subsequent actions, and our internal exchange. Why she was prepared to resign is her story, not ours.

To address the topics squarely that have caused the most speculation, here are the facts:

Neither Mr. Taylor nor his campaign ever requested, or received, any favor or action of any kind from AGCI. Political favoritism was creeping into MRAK’s reporting and causing concern among our readers, period. Ms. Downing was advised of AGCI’s desire to maintain neutrality in the Governor’s race long before she resigned.

Ms. Dowing was not fired; she was not pushed out or encouraged to leave. Quite the opposite: Our board sought every possible means to retain her. That door is still open.

Finally, our exchange that day was respectful; at no point was an ultimatum delivered, no single-option demand issued that she take down the article. Quite the opposite.

I asked her respectfully to revise the article to more fairly frame the issue and to quell concerns about favoritism in our reporting. I supplied what I believed to be supporting facts, for example that the waiver was proper protocol and supported by precedent and common sense. My request was summarily dismissed.  

Clearly, the article never came down because its removal was never the primary concern. 

During Ms. Downing’s nearly two-year tenure with AGCI, she insisted on—and received–total editorial control. Effectively, every article had each board member’s name associated with it. And yet, during this entire period, no officer ever intervened to quash an article or compromise editorial independence. Two-way trust was predicated on the understanding that if a line was crossed, it would be resolved through dialogue. Board observance of editorial independence, contrary to press reports, has been exemplary. 

So what happened? MRAK’s original model, under Ms. Downing’s ownership, was free to endorse, or oppose, any candidate of her choosing. AGCI, on the other hand, develops editorial policy collaboratively, and believes neutrality serves the interests of Alaskans. This should not be viewed as dividing conservatives or Republicans. I would like to believe it builds trust and honors our diverse audience of conservative thinkers.

When AGCI acquired Must Read, the publication was “blackballed” by Facebook, meaning we couldn’t post to it.  Twitter had silenced President Donald Trump, and President Biden was using the Justice Department to pressure social media channels to censor conservative content. Ms. Downing needed to take care of her ailing mother. AGCI stepped in to support, not to sideline, this conservative voice.

Change is hard, but it can lead to new and better futures. Must Read Alaska will continue to provide a bulwark of conservative news and commentary in Alaska journalism. Our emphasis may shift, but our mission will remain.

Jon Faulkner is the president of Alaska Gold Communications, the parent company of Must Read Alaska.