Tuesday, April 14, 2026
Home Blog Page 1327

Juneau Assembly passes quarantine for those coming to the Capital City

4

The Juneau City Assembly has passed a resolution mandating a 14-day self-quarantine for all people coming into the community, with vast exceptions for members of mainly government jobs that are considered critical.

Resolution 2886 A Resolution Mandating People Traveling into the City and Borough of Juneau Must Quarantine Related to COVID-19 exemptions include:

State workers, transportation and logistics, agricultural operations, including fishing and fish-processing, energy – including oil and gas production, critical manufacturing, raw material production for manufacturing, including mining and timber, water, wastewater and sanitation, government functions, public safety and first responders, healthcare and public health, financial services, communications and defense.

There was much left unclear about what happens if people come to Juneau for medical care or hospitalization, such as a pregnant woman in labor, or people coming into town to catch a flight or ferry to another community, but who are stuck due to weather or logistics and have to spend a night or more at a hotel. There is no exemption made for shoppers coming to town from Haines or Skagway who need to load up at Costco and return to their communities. [Clarification: That applies to those communities that have confirmed cases]. In fact, the scenario that passed the Juneau Assembly is a stunning impact on neighboring communities that consider Juneau the commercial hub.

There is no way to enforce the quarantine, noted Mayor Beth Weldon, who said the six police officers are already busy with their regular law enforcement duties.

There’s also no practical way to notify people from other areas in state and out of state to not come to Juneau. But for Juneauites, most residents are likely to comply on the honor system.

The motion passed 6-3 and is effective today at 11:59 pm. Assembly members Loren Jones, Wade Bryson, and Mayor Beth Weldon voted against it.

Economist Ed King files letter of intent for Juneau House District 34

5

Economist Ed King of Juneau has filed a letter of intent to run for House District 34.

It’s a district that in 2016 did not reelect longtime moderate Rep. Cathy Munoz, but put far left Justin Parrish in her place. He lasted two years before bowing out, and school board member Andi Story ran for the seat, beating Republican candidate and City Assemblyman Jerry Nankervis in 2018.

King is a registered nonpartisan who will not run in the August primary but go straight to the General Election ballot. He is an economist and owner of King Economics Group.

“I’ve been analyzing, advising, and assisting with the state’s finances for 7 years now,” he wrote on Facebook. “Or, I should say my advice has been mostly ignored by the commissioners, governors, and legislators I’ve advised for the last 7 years.”

“The reactionary and politically motivated decisions of the past have lead us to the place we are today. Watching it unfold in real time has frustrated me to the point of quitting some well-paying jobs,” he wrote. King said he can’t stand on the sidelines and watch the state walk off a fiscal cliff. He intends to try to break up the partisanship in the Legislature.

“I’ve filed a letter of intent to run for State House as an independent. Over the next week or two, I’ll be seriously contemplating the decision,” King wrote.

“Anyone that really knows me understands that I am a centrist and a realist. I don’t follow any party line and I reject rhetoric. I follow the data, and I’m willing to update my understanding when better data arrives. I seek objective truth and try to dismiss hyperbole. Most of the time, that leads me to politically unpopular and contrarian conclusions. But, it also tends to lead me toward better, unbiased decisions,” he wrote.

King has a bachelors degree in economics from the University of Washington, an MS in applied economics from the University of Alaska Fairbanks, and a certificate from Stanford University in strategic decision and risk management. He runs a blog on economics of Alaska at King Economics Group.

Legislature’s response to coronavirus is predictable, and irresponsible

33

By REP. DAVID EASTMAN

The mess in our Legislature in Juneau today is far greater than any one legislator will be able to fix, but that does not mean that every single legislator should not be working earnestly today to do their part to fix it. I am committed to doing my part, day in and day out, which sets me at odds with the status quo in Juneau.

When I first expressed concern about the coronavirus in January, I cautioned those in Juneau and other parts of the state to take this virus seriously. The response was sadly predictable. The response from ADN and the political blogs was to mock the one legislator who was willing to call attention to it at the time.

When I wrote in January about the censorship of doctors in China, who were trying to warn their countrymen about the disease, there was still significant reluctance to talking about it in the state capitol building.

When I highlighted the first discussion about the virus in the U.S. Senate, and then passed on advice that “The Time to Prepare is NOW” on February 3rd, Juneau was still not ready to take this virus seriously.

I responded by simply reminding the critics that “All truth passes through three stages. First, it is ridiculed. Second, it is violently opposed. Third, it is accepted as being self-evident.” (Arthur Schopenhauer)

It is a very familiar progression, as it is a path that I have walked down many times since first becoming a legislator. We walked down that path for three long years in the effort to repeal SB91. We were repeatedly told that it was impossible, that there was no stopping it, that we would simply have to let SB91 “run its course”, that those in Juneau who supported it were too powerful. Thankfully, there were some in Juneau (including then Sen. Mike Dunleavy) who were willing to persevere anyway, and SB91 is now repealed.

I have been walking a similar path with the Coronavirus for the last two months, and we have now reached the point where the crisis of the coronavirus is now accepted as being self-evident everywhere; everywhere except Juneau that is.

To Juneau, everything is political. The political angle is the focus. Everything else is blurry. This is what is meant when you hear someone say that those in Juneau are blind. It’s not actual blindness, it’s simply an extreme case of tunnel-vision. This becomes painfully clear with something as tangible and as terrible as the coronavirus. It is coming. We know it is coming. It is coming to Juneau, just as it is coming to any community in Alaska that maintains passenger traffic with other parts of the state and nation.

And yet, the legislature has literally done nothing to prepare for the arrival of the virus in Juneau. If the coronavirus were to be identified in the capitol building this morning, unlike legislatures in other states, the Alaska Legislature has no contingency for how to conduct business without assembling all legislators together into a single room.

The White House has advised all Americans to avoid groups of more than ten people due to the extremely contagious nature of the coronavirus. The response in Juneau has largely been “it won’t happen to me”, and so, other than shutting the capitol building to the public, we have largely continued with business as usual.

Each day, the House of Representatives assembles, as usual, putting more than 50 people in the same room, a number of whom are senior legislators in the 70’s.

Yesterday, the entire Georgia legislature was urged to self-quarantine after a Georgia senator tested positive for the coronavirus. Do we think this won’t happen here?

Over the last ten days, we have debated bills on electric bicyclesnotaries, and changing the name of a road. This is Juneau. You aren’t dreaming; this is what it’s really like. While other nations are enduring conditions not seen since World War II, we have prioritized debating a new law for electric bicycles.

I’m sure, simply for writing this, my colleagues in the legislature will be looking for new ways to punish and silence me, but if no one has the courage to call a spade a spade, legislators will continue to walk the streets of Juneau wearing little more than the invisible clothes that exist only in their imagination.

The first item of business when the legislature gathers today should be passage of a bill that establishes legal authority for the legislature to conduct business without physically assembling more than 50 people in the same room. That’s it. That should be our first order of business. No exceptions.

Other states have passed similar bills. Why not Alaska?

It hasn’t happened in Alaska yet because doing so would deprive some legislators of a helpful excuse to rush their favorite bills through the process unvetted.

Juneau is so hopelessly mired in politics today that, rather than spur the legislature to action, the threat of the virus is simply seen as a political tool to accomplish old political agendas. Last week, it was used as an excuse to push through an absolutely awful “mental health budget” (what fighting against the U.S. Supreme Court’s Janus decision has to do with mental health is your guess as well as mine), and was used yesterday as an excuse to pass the largest supplemental budget in state history, only a small fraction of which had anything to do with responding to the coronavirus.

Juneau needs help today. It needs concerned Alaskans to take note of the mind-boggling decisions that legislators are making. It needs concerned Alaskans willing to ask legislators the hard questions that few in Juneau seem willing to ask. And when legislators offer unsatisfactory answers, it needs individual Alaskans who won’t take a non-answer for an answer and, when the time comes, will be willing to vote against maintaining the status quo in Juneau.

Perhaps most of all, Alaska needs a handful of good men and women who are willing to make the personal sacrifice to take a tour of duty and deploy to Juneau for six months or more each year to protect their neighbors from the damaging, long-term decisions the legislature will continue to make if they do not. Otherwise, the status quo will continue.

It didn’t have to be this way. But it is. So let’s deal with it and each do our part to fix this mess.

Rep. David Eastman represents District 10, Wasilla.

Back PFD payments are the stimulus Alaskans need now

32

By SEN. MIA COSTELLO

As Alaskans face the current COVID-19 outbreak, we face a lot of uncertainty about how severe the disease’s spread will be. We hope that the disease’s spread can be slowed, and Alaska’s public health community is doing yeoman’s work to slow it.

But we already know that with this health crisis comes a severe economic crisis. We already face business closures, layoffs, and wage losses. And we aren’t out of the woods yet, far from it.

Alaskans will get through this as we always do: with tenacity, hard work, and caring for one another. But part of that means that we in state government need to do everything we can to help Alaskans ride out this economic crunch as best we can.

Economists disagree about many things, but nearly all of them agree: in times of economic crisis, the monetary authorities need to inject liquidity – cash – into the economy.

The federal government knows this well, and regularly takes steps to increase the money supply in times of economic crisis, usually by slashing interest rates.

But there’s a limit to how low interest rates can go, and we’re almost there already. Fortunately, there’s another solution: direct cash payments to Americans.

Sounds like something Alaskans know well, doesn’t it?

In Alaska, we know that our permanent fund dividends always provide a boost to our economy. We see it every year. The federal government knows it too, which is why President Trump and Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell each have proposals to pay cash directly to Americans.

Paying cash to every American is a big job, and it will take some time for the federal government to get set up to do that. But here in Alaska, we are already prepared – we do it every year. We already have the applicants, their eligibility has already been verified – because we paid them just a few months ago.

The Permanent Fund Dividend is part of being Alaskan – but it is so much more than that. It has been found to significantly reduce obesity in Alaskan children. But most importantly, it has been found to lift between 15,000 and 25,000 Alaskans – especially children, rural residents, and Alaska Natives – out of poverty every year.

There really is no way to seriously address our looming economic crisis without giving this serious consideration. Many Alaskans are already finding themselves without income. The dividend is income. It’s the most direct solution, providing direct relief to the specific problem Alaskans are facing.

There are numerous examples of how Alaskans might use their dividend as relief from the hardships of this outbreak. A family in Chevak might use it to pay for fuel costs in rural Alaska; elderly Alaskan who can pay $500 a month for incontinence products not covered by Medicare could use it to pay for three months of adult diapers; a laid-off single mother could use it to put food on the table.

If this payment means that a family can pay their rent one month more, that by itself can keep them from losing their housing, having to go on expensive state services, and having their lives permanently and negatively disrupted.

The legislature should immediately vote to pay the remaining dividend of $1,300 from our reserve account. This account currently has $18 billion dollars. A withdrawal of $750 million from this account would cover the back dividend from 2019 – and would fulfill a promise made to Alaskans in law. Another dividend should be paid to Alaskans in October.

This can’t wait. Restaurants, bars, schools, and many, many other gathering places and businesses have already been closed all over the state. They will remain closed for the duration of this COVID-19 outbreak – and we don’t know how long that will be.

The Great Alaska COVID-19 Recession is already here, and we need to act now to help Alaskans get through it as best we can. Alaskan wage earners are already finding themselves without hours to work – and staring down bills they don’t know how to pay. It’s not a distant future, or even an imminent one – it’s here now. We can help Alaskans now, and we should.

Sen. Mia Costello is a lifelong Alaskan who represents West Anchorage in the Alaska Senate.

Seven new cases in five communities: Sterling, Soldotna, Anchorage, Fairbanks, Ketchikan

0

In addition to the three new cases of COVID-19 in Ketchikan identified today, two more cases have popped up on the Kenai Peninsula, according to the Kenai Peninsula Borough Office of Emergency Management, bringing a total of five statewide.

[Read: Three more cases in Ketchikan; citizens ordered to shelter in place]

Across the state, seven new cases of COVID-19 were detected five communities that include Soldotna, Sterling, Anchorage, Fairbanks, and Ketchikan.

One of the Peninsula cases is in Soldotna and the other is in Sterling, bringing the total to three known cases of COVID-19 for the Kenai Peninsula. The first case on the Peninsula was diagnosed in Seward earlier this week. No other information on these cases was available.

The Soldotna and the Anchorage cases were both travel-related with travel to the Lower 48.

All of the other cases were non-travel related and are currently being investigated. All cases were in adults; none was hospitalized.

“All of the new cases are isolating themselves at home and their close contacts are being asked to self-quarantine for 14 days and monitor for symptoms,” said Alaska’s State Epidemiologist, Dr. Joe McLaughlin. “Our thoughts go out to these people, their families and their communities. All of these individuals are being conscientious and cooperating fully with public health officials.”

McLaughlin added, “The biggest challenge in our containment effort is when people continue to interact with others when they have symptoms.  I can’t underscore this point enough: If you feel even mild symptoms of a respiratory infection, you need to immediately go home and stay away from others until your symptoms resolve.” 

“It is vital that every person is doing as much as possible to slow the spread of this disease,” added Alaska’s Chief Medical Officer Dr. Anne Zink. “Social distancing is critical. Stay home as much as you can and, even if you’re healthy, stay away from those more vulnerable to severe illness, including those 60 or older, or anyone who might have an underlying medical condition.”

Travelers arriving from anywhere outside of Alaska should self-quarantine for 14 days, per the March 20th Alaska Health Alert. Find more information about how to keep yourself and your family healthy at coronavirus.alaska.gov.

Three more cases in Ketchikan; citizens ordered to shelter in place

1

The Alaska Department of Health and Social Services says there are three new positive cases of COVID-19 in Ketchikan, for a total of six.

The three individuals, upon experiencing symptoms of illness, self-isolated and sought testing by a local provider, according to Ketchikan Emergency Operations.

Two of the individuals were close contacts to the first identified positive case in Ketchikan. One of the individuals was a close contact with the second identified positive case in Ketchikan.

The mayors of the City of Ketchikan and the Ketchikan Gateway Borough have issued a “shelter in place” order, as follows:

Joint Mayoral Proclamation Under State of Emergency to Shelter in Place

Because the COVID-19 virus is so highly contagious, it has already spread rapidly in Ketchikan. In the last few days we have gone from one positive case to six positive cases. This rapid spread is known as exponential growth. If the growth continues at the current rate, by the end of the week Ketchikan could have over 20 positive cases of COVID-19 in the community. We need to stop the spread now.

Due to the exponential spread of the COVID-19 virus in Ketchikan, and in accordance with the recommendations of the Ketchikan Emergency Operations Center (EOC), the mayors of the City of Ketchikan, City of Saxman, and Ketchikan Gateway Borough have issued a joint proclamation strongly urging the citizens of Ketchikan to hunker down, shelter in place, and stay home, in order to contain the spread of COVID-19.

In keeping with the mandates issued by Governor Dunleavy on March 21, 2020, we remind our citizens to practice social distancing and that no gatherings of more than 10 people may take place, and if a gathering does take place people must be 6 feet apart from each other. Owners of businesses which are non-essential, to the extent possible, are urged to close for a period of at least 14 days.

We want to assure the public that vital services such as emergency, fire, police, and grocery stores will remain fully functioning and open and available. The flow of goods to Ketchikan is continuing and grocery store shelves will remain stocked.

Residents who are healthy and do not believe they have been exposed to COVID-19 may shop at grocery stores, but are asked to do without lingering. If you go out, practice health directives such as handwashing and social distancing by staying six feet away from others. Please help stop the spread of COVID-19 in Ketchikan. We encourage citizens to follow these CDC recommendations:

  • Wash your hands with soap and water often;
  • Avoid touching your nose, face and mouth;
  • Use sanitizer that is at least 60 percent alcohol;
  • Avoid people who are sick to help protect yourself;
  • To protect others, stay home if you are sick, cover coughs and sneezes, clean and disinfect surfaces,and remember that you could be asymptomatic but still carrying the virus.If you are sick or suspect that you may be infected with the COVID-19 virus, you should take steps to help prevent the disease from spreading to people in your home and community. If you think you have been exposed to COVID-19 and develop a fever and symptoms, such as cough or difficulty breathing, call your healthcare provider for medical advice. Additional current information on COVID-19 is available through the Alaska Department of Health and Social Services (DHSS) at www.coronavirus.alaska.gov. EOC information and the response to the COVID-19 outbreak in Ketchikan is updated daily on the COVID-19 Response page at https://www.kgbak.us/913/COVID-19-Response.

Mayor Berkowitz’ order says pot, liquor stores can stay open, but gun shops to close

MARIJUANA, LIQUOR ARE ESSENTIAL; GUN SALES NOT SO MUCH

Need a bouquet of flowers from your local florist? A new tube for your flat-tire bike? How about a new firearm or some ammo?

Get going now, Anchorage. You’re running out of time.

All businesses in Anchorage have been ordered closed on Sunday at 10 pm, except for those that Mayor Ethan Berkowitz of Anchorage has deemed critical. The order to remain closed lasts through March 31. That includes gun shops.

Small businesses will be hit the hardest during this closure. While a family florist’s merchandise will perish within a few days, the flower departments at Carrs and Fred Meyer, backed by major parent companies Safeway and Kroger, will continue to be open for business, because those flower shops are inside the grocery stores.

There are workarounds. Some small businesses are interpreting the rules by saying they do delivery and they’ll allow curbside pickup. You just cannot go in their small stores. They’ll continue to do business until the police come and shut them down.

Meanwhile, grocery stores in Anchorage are now packed to the gills as though it is Thanksgiving. Shoppers are more exposed to each other in grocery stores at this point than they would be at a flower shop.

Liquor stores are not specifically on the mayor’s list for critical businesses, but he mentions stores that sell “beverages” are considered essential, and so the liquor stores are sticking with that policy and will remain open.

Animal shelters are not included on the mayor’s list of exemptions; according to his list, they will close on Sunday night.

Critical businesses that may remain open include:

  1. Businesses providing any services or performing any work necessary to the operations and maintenance of”Critical Infrastructure,” including, but not limited to, the Port of Alaska, public works construction, construction of housing, airport operations, water, sewer, gas, electrical, oil production, roads and highways, trucking and shipping companies, public transportation, solid waste collection and removal, internet, and telecommunications systems;
  2. First responders, emergency management personnel, emergency dispatchers, court personnel, and law enforcement personnel;
  3. Critical Government Functions, meaning all services needed to ensure the continuing operation ofthe government agencies and provide for the health, safety, and welfare of the public. Federal and State of Alaska employees should follow direction of their employer regarding whether and where to report to work;
  4. Defense and national security-related operations supporting the U.S. Government or a contractor to the U.S. government;
  5. Grocery stores, supermarkets, food banks, pot shops, convenience stores, and other establishments engaged in the retail sale of food, beverages, or other household consumer products (such as cleaning and personal care products, pet food and pet supplies). This includes stores that sell groceries and also sell other non-grocery products, as well as stores that sell products necessary to maintaining the safety, sanitation, and operation of residences;
  6. Food cultivation, including fishing, hunting, farming, and livestock;
  7. Businesses that provide food, shelter, and social services, and other necessities of life for economically disadvantaged, unsheltered, or otherwise vulnerable individuals;
  8. Newspapers, television, radio, and other media services;
  9. Gas stations and auto-supply, auto-repair, towing companies, and related facilities;
  10. Banks, mortgage companies, insurance companies, and related financial institutions;
  11. Hardware stores;
  12. Plumbers, electricians, exterminators, and other service providers who provide services that are necessary to maintaining the safety, sanitation, and operation ofresidences and critical businesses;
  13. Businesses providing mailing and shipping services;
  14. Educational institutions for purposes of facilitating distance learning;
  15. Laundromats, dry cleaners, and laundry service providers;
  16. Restaurants, bars, and breweries and other facilities that prepare and serve food and beverages, but only for delivery or carry out under the restrictions laid out in the Mayor’s Emergency Order E0-01;
  17. Businesses that supply products needed for people to work from home;
  18. Businesses that supply other critical businesses with the support or supplies necessary to operate;
  19. Businesses that ship or deliver groceries, food, goods or services directly to residences;
  20. Businesses that provide transportation services of passengers or goods, including the Alaska Railroad;
  21. Home-based care for seniors, adults, or children;
  22. Hotels, residential facilities and shelters for seniors, adults, and children;
  23. Professional services, such as legal or accounting services, when necessary to assist in compliance with legally mandated activities;
  24. Childcare facilities, subject to new recommendations for increased hygiene and social distancing. Childcare facilities should be used only by those who need childcare to work at a critical job.

If business owners do not see their business category on the list, they may ask the mayor for an exemption.

Also beginning at 10 pm on Sunday, March 22, all residents of the Municipality of Anchorage must stay at home as much as possible, except to work in certain critical jobs, to get food and supplies, to receive or provide healthcare and to recreate outside without contacting others. 

On the limited occasions when individuals leave home, they should maintain a distance of at least six feet from anyone outside their household, the mayor ordered.

Although the gun sales are locked down in Anchorage as of Sunday night, Southcentral residents still may be able to find open gun stores in the Mat-Su Valley.

Political judges invite political pressure

17

By LOREN LEMAN

The Alaska Supreme Court has received an unusual amount of criticism lately, as it grapples with litigation challenging the effort to recall Governor Dunleavy. Chief Justice Joel Bolger, speaking at the 2019 Alaska Federation of Natives convention, said, “…we are facing a great deal of political pressure.”

Under different circumstances, I might empathize with his plight. However, the court’s troubles are mostly self-inflicted. When judges impartially interpret the law, we tend to leave them alone.

But when they instead impose their political ideology, disguised by a thin veneer of legal rhetoric, we respond differently. When judges behave like politicians, the public will naturally treat them like politicians.

Evidence of the court’s political activism stretches back decades. In 1970, in a case called Baker v. City of Fairbanks, the Supreme Court astonishingly claimed they possessed the “liberty to make constitutional progress” by writing their own interpretations of our Constitution into the law.

“It is our duty,” the Court declared, “to move forward in those areas of constitutional progress which we view as necessary to the development of a civilized way of life in Alaska.” “[W]e are free,” they told us, “and we are under a duty to develop additional constitutional rights and privileges…”

Let those words sink in. If a legislator wants to amend our constitution, it is an arduous process. A resolution must be introduced, committee hearings are held, and the proposed amendment must be approved by a two-thirds supermajority in both the House and the Senate. That by itself is an incredibly high hurdle.

But then the amendment must be placed before Alaska’s voters, and the supporters must be prepared to wage an expensive statewide campaign. I know—I have been involved in four successful amendments as a legislator.

Yet the Court declared that just three unelected judges can change the substance of the constitution, regardless of voter intent. The Baker decision is not some forgotten relic that is ignored by the court today. On the contrary, it is frequently quoted approvingly in modern-era decisions whenever the court tries to justify a ruling with no basis in either constitutional or statutory law.

For example, the court cited Baker in its 1997 Valley Hospital decision, in which it opined that abortion is a state constitutional right. Look hard to find the word “abortion” in the constitution – you won’t find because it’s not there. Nor did our constitutional convention in 1955-1956 mean to create a right to abortion. Abortion was illegal in the Territory—and it remained so for more than 11 years after Alaska became a state.

The fraudulent “right to abortion” has been interpreted in bizarre ways. In 1997, as a State Senator, I introduced a bill to ensure that a doctor could not perform an abortion on a minor girl without a parent’s consent. About 40 states have similar laws, and the U.S. Supreme Court has repeatedly upheld them. Yet the Alaska Supreme Court struck down this law, simply because 3 of 5 justices said they preferred a law requiring only parental notification.

Though I strongly disagreed with the decision, one-parent notification is better than none at all and I took the court at its word. In 2010, I was one of three citizen sponsors of a ballot initiative to enact a parental notice law. It was approved by 56 percent of Alaska’s voters.

Shockingly, the Supreme Court reneged on its earlier promise, and declared the notice law “unconstitutional.” Its decision is 64 pages of convoluted legal nonsense. Justice Craig Stowers, as the sole dissenter, wrote, “The court’s decision today… makes a mockery of its earlier proclamations of the proper and fundamental role parents have traditionally played in their children’s lives.” I agree.

The late U.S. Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia once criticized his liberal colleagues on the court, writing, “The Court must be living in another world. Day by day, case by case, it is busy designing a constitution for a country I do not recognize.” Alaska’s judges are guilty of the same behavior. They have worked for decades to design a state constitution that is getting harder to recognize. Under these circumstances, pressure the Court considers political is not likely to abate any time soon.

Loren Leman is an engineer and fisherman who served 14 years in the Legislature and one term as Lieutenant Governor, from 1989 through 2006. He and his wife Carolyn live in Anchorage.

###

Alaska Supreme Court: Recall to be argued by phone, out of sight of Alaskans

15

FULL SPEED AHEAD FOR PURELY POLITICAL MATTER

State emergency? National crisis? No worries. The Alaska Supreme Court will hear oral arguments on Wednesday, March 25 in a purely political matter — the partisan attempt to recall Gov. Mike Dunleavy.

For the State Department of Law, one lawyer — Margaret Paton-Walsh — will represent the Division of Elections, which decided the merits of the recall case did not qualify for a recall. She will argue that the law and Alaska Constitution never intended that the recall process should be used for frivolous partisan and policy disputes over how large the budget cuts should be in a time of fiscal crisis. She’ll argue that appointing a judge a few days after the statutory deadline is not the same as “breaking the law,” especially when there was no judicial vacancy. She’ll argue that all communications from the Governor’s Office are political, and that attacking a governor for being political is absurd, when he occupies a political office.

For the Recall Dunleavy Committee, former members of the Walker Administration will argue that it’s not for the Division of Elections to decide what is worth a recall — they followed the process outlined by Alaska Statute to the letter. Former Attorney General Jahna Lindemuth and former Walker Chief of Staff Scott Kendall will tell the Supreme Court that it’s up to voters to decide the merits of the recall, not for the Division of Elections.

The two lead lawyers from the Walker Administration won’t be alone, however. They have three support lawyers in Anchorage-based Samuel Gekler Gottstein and Susan Orlansky, and Seattle super lawyer Jeffrey Feldman.

One lawyer against five lawyers seems daunting, but in fact most Alaska political and legal observers think the Supreme Court has already made up its mind and that this is merely a small bump in the road for the Recall Dunleavy Committee.

Last month, Chief Justice Joel Bolger was pressured to recuse himself from the case because he had made several statements that appeared prejudicial against Gov. Mike Dunleavy. He eventually relented.

Another Supreme Court justice is married to a highly compensated employee at the University of Alaska, an organization that took a 17 percent cut from the Dunleavy Administration in last year’s budget, and will get a similar cut this year. If Dunleavy is removed from office, the University may escape a cut that the Board of Regents negotiated with Dunleavy for next year. That justice, Daniel Winfree, has a direct conflict of interest due to his wife’s job, but has not recused himself.

[Read: Under pressure, chief justice recuses himself from recall case]

The arguments in front of the Supreme Court will be heard via telephone, since the courts are practicing social distancing as a result of fears over the COVID-19 coronavirus. All criminal jury trials have been postponed for now, but it appears the Supreme Court wants to clear this political trial off of its calendar.

The Alaska Supreme Court advises that the public may be able to witness the event by watching Gavel Alaska, although there is no guarantee that the public station will be broadcasting it. No members of the public will be allowed in the courtroom.

Not all oral arguments are videotaped and with the State ban on nonessential travel, there’s no guarantee this one will be available. Sometimes these Supreme Court arguments broadcast are broadcast live and one with the level of interest this case generates will surely fall into that category with Juneau-based KTOO, which operates Gavel Alaska. That is, if the current Anchorage shelter in place orders from the mayor and the current travel bans from the Department of Health and Social Services do not apply.

Oral arguments before the Alaska Supreme Court typically air on Sundays, from 4 p.m. to 7 p.m. Check the Gavel Alaska website for the schedule.

Here is the exact recall petition language that will be considered by the Supreme Court at 1:30 pm on March 25:

Statement of Grounds: Neglect of Duties,Incompetence, and/or Lack of Fitness, for the following actions:

  • Governor Dunleavy violated Alaska law by refusing to appoint a judge to the Palmer Superior Court within 45 days of receiving nominations.
  • Governor Dunleavy violated Alaska Law and the Constitution, and misused state funds by unlawfully and without proper disclosure, authorizing and allowing the use of state funds for partisan purposes to purchase electronic advertisements and direct mailers making partisan statements about political opponents and supporters.
  • Governor Dunleavy violated separation-of-powers by improperly using the line-item veto to: (a) attack the judiciary and the rule of law.
  • Governor Dunleavy acted incompetently when he mistakenly vetoed approximately $18 million more than he told the legislature in official communications he intended to strike. Uncorrected, the error would cause the state to lose over $40 million in additional federal Medicaid funds.