Monday, July 6, 2026
Home Blog Page 1308

‘Fair is fair’: Eagle River Republicans ask Anchorage to grant Bear Paw permit

14

The executive committee of the District 14 Republicans in Eagle River has sent a letter to Mayor Ethan Berkowitz, asking him to reconsider the municipality’s decision to withhold permits for the 39th annual Eagle River Bear Paw Festival, scheduled for July 8-12. The letter was also addressed to the Anchorage Assembly and copied to the Eagle River Chamber of Commerce.

“We understand that the most recent Anchorage COVID-19 emergency declaration submitted by Mayor Berkowitz and approved by the Anchorage Assembly has been extended until July 31, 2020. The Administration, however, established a precedent to allow public gatherings, even during this period of emergency declaration. One example is the ongoing Saturday Markets,” the group wrote.

“To disallow the Bear Paw Festival is an inconsistent application of Municipal policy. We would like the same opportunity as others to create a positive community event in Eagle River, one that has huge ramifications for recharging the entire municipality, as well as to help the economy and small businesses to recover,” the letter continued.

The group said that Eagle River would be able to have the beloved festival with appropriate safety measures, and that the Bear Paw Festival is a much-needed break after four months of “hunkering down.”

The letter was signed by Julie Blackley, the chair of GOP District 14.

While the municipality has denied permits for the annual Eagle River event, Mayor Ethan Berkowitz joined hundreds of protesters in Anchorage to express disapproval for police brutality in a Black Lives Matter rally.

Here he was, speaking to protesters at the rally on June 6:

Michael Tavoliero, a Republican activist in Eagle River, said no group seems to be coming forward to defend the economic, social, and spiritual events in communities across the state, whether it’s the State Fair, Mount Marathon, or the Eagle River Bear Paw Festival.

Another group that had trouble getting a permit from the Municipality is a gathering of Christians will come together at the Delaney Park Strip on Friday — the very place where the mayor was speaking on June 6 at an event that had several hundred people at it.

The “Civil Righteousness: Unified Prayer for Racial Healing in Alaska” group said they were finally able to get a permit for their event, planned for Friday at 6 pm, after they promised no more than 500 would attend.


Civil Righteousness: Unified Prayer For Racial Healing in Alaska

Breaking: Mayor Pierce wins endorsement of both area Republican women clubs

GOP WOMEN EVEN PASS OVER THEIR PAST CLUB PRESIDENT

At the campaign kickoff for Kenai Peninsula Borough Mayor Charlie Pierce on Saturday, both Republican women’s groups on the Kenai Peninsula brought in big endorsements for the incumbent mayor.

Kenai Peninsula Republican Women of Alaska and the Republican Women of the Kenai endorsed Pierce over another Republican, Linda Hutchings, who is also running for borough mayor.

The position of mayor is nonpartisan, but the support from both conservative women’s groups comes as a bit of a surprise, since Hutchings is the past president of one of the women’s groups — the Kenai Peninsula Republican Women’s Club.

Hutchings ran for mayor in 2017 and some voters felt her campaign launched a vicious personal attack against Pierce’s family. It was considered one of the nastiest attacks in local politics seen in Alaska in years. Hutchings is also a well-known ally of Rep. Gary Knopp, who is viewed by some Peninsula Republicans as a traitor, after he helped form up a coup against the House Republican leadership and installed Democrats in control.

The women from Hutchings’ old club voted unanimously to not endorse Hutchings this time around.

“The Kenai Peninsula Republican Women’s Club enthusiastically endorses Borough Mayor Charlie Pierce for reelection. Today at his campaign kick-off event we donated $500 to his campaign. We believe he is the conservative candidate who has kept his promises as our mayor and he has earned our support,” the group announced on Facebook.

Mayor Charlie Pierce sports one of the name tags for his fundraiser.

At his kickoff event, several local lawmakers and political figures praised Pierce, including Rep. Sarah VanceRep. Ben CarpenterSen. Peter A. MiccicheHouse candidates Ron Gillham and James Baisden, Wayne Ogle and Tuckerman Babcock, former chair of the Alaska Republican Party, who received a standing ovation. Incoming Alaska Republican Party National Committeeman Mike Tauriainen, who represents Alaska on the Republican National Committee, gave the opening prayer.

The other club, the Republican Women of Kenai, club endorsed Pierce in 2017.

Close to 75 people attended the event at The Catch Restaurant in Soldotna, which was emceed by John Quick, who is Pierce’s former chief of staff.

The official candidate filing period is Aug. 3-17 for the election, which will be held Oct. 6. More election information is at this link.

Recover Alaska help pass alcohol tax, possibly illegally

By THE ANCHORAGE DAILY PLANET

The Alaska Public Offices Commission this week heard its staff complaint against Recover Alaska’s actions in the April election, where voters approved a 5 percent alcohol retail tax they had killed only last year.

APOC made no decision after the Wednesday hearing and has 10 days to reach a finding.

Recover Alaska, a nonprofit, is a coalition of groups trying to reduce the harm of excessive alcohol consumption in Alaska. Its website indicates its has several “funding partners,” including the Alaska Mental Health Trust Authority, a state corporation, and the Alaska Department of Health and Social Services, a state agency.

Recover Alaska failed to register with the campaign watchdog agency as a campaign group, as required by law, and did not reveal its income and spending, APOC staff says.

The nonprofit polled Anchorage voters to discover what messages would get them to support an alcohol tax, then it worked to persuade voters and have them return their mail-in ballots.

Recover Alaska gave the campaign’s public face, “Yes for a Safe, Healthy Anchorage,” at least $70,000 of the nearly $250,000 it received in contributions. There also were Facebook and radio ads.

“These expenditures required Recover to register and report their activity. Staff now files this complaint and believes the facts will show that Recover violated provisions of campaign disclosure law,” the APOC staff complaint states.

While the commission decides what to do, or not do, with Recover Alaska, we, and all Alaskans, are left to wonder whether any state money – through Recover Alaska’s “funding partners” – made its way into the campaign to pass the tax.

Read more from The Anchorage Daily Planet here.

Breaking: Tom McKay wins huge endorsement from GOP officers for District 24 House

8

Tom McKay, who has challenged Rep. Chuck Kopp for House District 24, had a big week. He won his District pre-primary endorsement, and now he has won the endorsement of the entire State Central Committee of the Alaska Republican Party.

That means the Republican party can spend resources to get him elected, and won’t help incumbent Kopp, who many see as having helped engineer a political coup against the Republican majority in the House.

McKay had another win this week. The Anchorage Republican Women’s Club voted to endorse him. That means he will have an army of volunteers helping him, and the club will likely make a donation to help McKay win the primary, which is Aug. 18.

McKay is a retired petroleum engineer and the former chair of the Alaska Republican Party.

“I am and will always be a committed Republican, dedicated to the principles that have worked so well for our state and nation. Unlike some legislators, my values are not for sale,” McKay said. “We need to get back to the fundamental principles which made America and Alaska great.”

Millennials taking over the workplace: 3 things to know

By JOHN QUICK

Now that America is hiring again, it’s time to take a look at our workforce because it will look very different from here on out. Millennials are taking over during this era, as older workers head for the exits.

Like it or not, these millennial workers are a management challenge.

The tips I’m about to give you are not going to be easy to hear because it will require you to make the changes. Millennials, those between the ages of 26 and 40 (born between 1980-1994) won’t bend to fit old molds.

I’m a millennial myself and I understand them.

I’ve worked with them for years and (kind of) know how to manage them toward success — success for my businesses and success for their own career path.

So, please bear with me while I lay out the realities that will help you avoid frustration.

Millennials Like to Have Fun at Work and Need to Have Purpose

They have a strong urge to enjoy what they are doing. Their dad may have worked as a mechanic his entire life and only saw his job as a paycheck. The pendulum tends to swing to the opposite of that for almost all millennials in professional jobs. They have to get satisfaction from what they are doing. Not only do they have to have fun, but some also need to feel a deep sense of purpose in their jobs.

That you can give them.

If you own a business and are hiring millennials and want to keep them, make sure your enterprise has both a mission and vision statement. These statements should trickle down to roles and responsibilities of each job. These mission and vision statements should also bleed joy and meaningful impact into day-to-day operations of your businesses.

9-5 Does Not Work for Millennials

Nine to five needs to be thrown out the window, if at all possible for your work ecosystem.

Millennials don’t like being told to show up for a job Monday-Friday 9 a.m. to 5 p.m.

You have two choices here: you can fight them and go through handfuls of new hires who leave through the back door every three weeks, or you can go along to get along.

Create an environment that gives them space to think creatively, which includes not micromanaging them and their schedules by the minute.

Give them goals and things to accomplish and remove the walls of your box that you typically like to have people accomplish these things in. Measure their successes by their fruit and not by their ability to fit into a mold that worked for you and your generation.

You can always get someone to show up 9 a.m. to 5 p.m., but you can’t always get someone to buy into your company, and because they are sold on the mission and vision of your company, go to great lengths to make sure it’s a success.

And yes, these workers require a bit more “avocado toast and macchiato” handling in the mornings. But if you find the right fit for your company, and if you can adjust to their night owl ways, you’ll find them loyal and mission driven.

Millennials Need Positive Reinforcement

We live in a world where people are glued to their phones, and they see the false narratives of this world 24/7 via this little screen. Because of this bombardment of negativity, they want to have a positive space in their lives, which includes their work.

If you want what will bring the most success to your company and you employ millennials, use positive reinforcement as often as possible.

No one wants to work for a negative, screaming boss.

Millennials will not put up with this and although they won’t make it into a big deal; they will move on. If a job is just a paycheck, then you put up with negativity.

If a job is a calling to make a significant impact in the world, then you will leave a job that lacks the vision and look for a work environment that could be all this, and more.

Millennials have to enjoy their work, have flexibilitflexibility, y in a work schedule, and need positive reinforcement. If your business goals are to make an impact and make money, then this should not be a big deal.

If your goal is to control everything and make employees fit your stereotype, then you’ll face a lot of frustration with your millennial workforce.

One of John Quick’s many super powers is to help your business discover how to best use social media and technology to connect with customers, drive traffic, tell your authentic story, and increase sales. He’s entrepreneur and a former regional director for Samaritan’s Purse, and is known as “chief implementor and red tape cutter.”

Lone dissenter? Juneau man protests in support of police

18

Jerry Nankervis of Juneau had heard enough of the anti-police rhetoric that’s been sounded ’round the nation.

In a moment of inspiration on Friday, he appeared at City Hall for about 90 minutes with a sign, which said “Thank you JPD” on one side and “Support and Fund Our Police” on the other.

Nankervis is a retiree from the Juneau Police Department and a former member of the Juneau Assembly. He ran for House in 2018, but as a Republican, he didn’t win in the General Election, which went to Rep. Andi Story.

Nankervis isn’t your typical protester, but said he considered what was happening in Seattle and thought about the quote from Edmund Burke: “When bad men combine, the good must associate; else they will fall, one by one, an unpitied sacrifice in a contemptible struggle.”

In Seattle, a Socialist summer camp has taken over a large section of Capitol Hill and is calling it the Capitol Hill Autonomous Zone, where no police are allowed. This occurred after days of rioting, looting, and clashes with police.

Nankervis’ admittedly lone quest on the corner of a quiet, non-touristed downtown Juneau was generally met with approval by passing drivers, about 15-1 in favor of his message, which he found encouraging.

Jerry Nankervis

Just two drivers visibly disagreed: One stopped to shout, “Defund the police! They have tanks!” He gave Nankervis the finger and told him to “Grow the f– up” before driving off. The other apparent dissenter just rolled his eyes and drove on.

“I didn’t do it for the attention, I did it because it has to be done,” Nankervis said.

Nankervis spent 24 years on the Juneau police force, from which he retired as a captain. He is active in youth hockey, in addition to his former work on the Assembly.

First Amendment rights? Only for the Left

By WIN GRUENING

Americans were horrified by the senseless killing of George Floyd, an unarmed black man, by a white Minneapolis police officer. 

Subsequently, Americans were horrified by the indiscriminate looting and vandalism that accompanied the demonstrations in scores of cities across our nation.

Sadly, the destruction, as well as the violence directed at police forces attempting to maintain order and protect lives and property, were dismissed by many in the media as an unfortunate by-product of frustration and anger of protesters.

To be fair, many peaceful demonstrators, black and white, decried the violence and attempted to prevent more destruction.  

There were reports that organized extremists instigated looting and participated in burning down stores, churches, and even a police station. 

Unable to distinguish between legitimate protesters and criminal vandals and looters, police were put in an impossible situation, and, in some cases, ordered to stand down while lawlessness prevailed, and cities burned.

In our country, peaceful protest is protected. All citizens have a right to be heard.  But the message of the protesters was undermined by the violence and mayhem that occurred.

The media’s treatment of Black Lives Matter (BLM) protests, often describing them as mostly peaceful, while labeling nearby rioting mobs as “uprisings”, was clearly at odds with what America witnessed on their television screens.

Even more stark was the media’s selective reversal on Covid-19 mandates.  Aided by politicians and talking-heads, organized BLM protests were enthusiastically endorsed throughout the media.  In contrast, earlier public positions and protests by business-owners, churches, and organizations advocating for opening up the nation’s devastated economy were roundly condemned.

Both groups were exercising their 1st Amendment right to protest unwarranted or unlawful government authority. Yet, the reaction to them by the public, local authorities and the media was often diametrically opposed.

  • Amid nation-wide coronavirus fears, citizens were publicly shamed for not wearing masks or observing social-distancing guidelines.
  • After months of complying with hunker-down orders, financially strapped shop owners were arrested or cited for re-opening “non-essential” businesses.  Their crime: allowing employees to go back to work in order to support their families.  
  • NY Mayor de Blasio directed the NYPD to arrest violators in large groups. “This is about stopping this disease and saving lives,” he said.

Black Lives Matter protests were treated quite differently. 

  • In a nation where funerals, church services, and large gatherings were prohibited, the massive demonstrations of people across America were given a pass. Many demonstrators openly ignored health warnings to wear masks or exercise social-distancing. 
  • Hollywood, predictably, joined the chorus of protesters and contributed money for funds to bail lawbreakers out of jail.   There were few consequences for criminals – the few arrested were released within hours of their arrest.
  • Two newspaper editors were forced to resign for daring to publish op-eds deploring the destruction or suggesting that federal troops be used to curb violence.

As protests continued, along with public memorial services for George Floyd, it became abundantly clear that Covid-19 mandates weren’t meant to be applied to everyone – just those not demonstrating for an acceptable cause.  Governors and mayors across the country encouraged and joined the BLM protests – all the while insisting that other large gatherings remain strictly forbidden for health reasons.

Just weeks before, Alaska shop owners objecting to health mandates were widely criticized for “putting the lives of their fellow citizens at risk in the pursuit of profits.”

Anchorage Mayor Ethan Berkowitz, who joined peaceful protests, also thought lives were at risk, but not in the way you might think.  During a recent community radio address, he elevated Black Lives Matter protesters to hero status by saying “I see people who are risking their lives to protest…in spite of a pandemic”.

That comment diminishes the sacrifice of thousands of real heroes in our country’s history who risked and lost their lives defending the constitutional right of all Americans to protest.

The coronavirus doesn’t distinguish between conservative and liberal protests. According to some, apparently our 1st Amendment rights do.

The complex and deep-seated issues facing our country won’t be solved by quelling debate and limiting personal freedoms of those expressing opinions with which we disagree.

Win Gruening retired as the senior vice president in charge of business banking for Key Bank in 2012. He was born and raised in Juneau and graduated from the U.S. Air Force Academy in 1970. He is active in community affairs as a 30-plus year member of Juneau Downtown Rotary Club and has been involved in various local and statewide organizations.

Ratepayers need full disclosure on ML&P and Chugach Electric deal

8

WHAT THE RCA APPROVED IS NOT WHAT WE VOTED ON

By BOB MAIER

“The transaction as conceived by ML&P and Chugach was not straightforward.”

So states the Regulatory Commission of Alaska’s – 152-page decision released May 28 concerning the sale of Municipal Light and Power to Chugach Electric.  

There are myriad issues addressed in the order, including Beluga River natural gas, creation of a tight power pool with Matanuska Electric, economic regulation of the Anchorage Water and Wastewater Utility, the Eklutna Power Project, creation of a new Municipal Utility Municipal Hydro Power, the portion of the billion dollar purchase price known as the acquisition premium, the promise of “No Increase of Base Rates,” the environmental remediation of the ML&P campus, the dividend restriction placed upon ML&P, the “Payment in Lieu of Taxes,” and the Municipal Utility Services Assessment.

The issue I will focus on is the solemn promise of “No Increase on Base Rates,” along with the up-coming rate increases as mandated by the RCA decision.

Prior to the April 03, 2018 Anchorage Municipal election, Chugach and ML&P were involved in an extensive advertising and educational campaign leading up to the vote on Proposition 10, which is the sale of ML&P to Chugach Electric.  

Despite the ballot language and all of the public assurances, when Chugach filed their application with the RCA on April 1, 2019, Section IV titled “Approvals Requested” informs the RCA that the transaction cannot be completed unless the RCA authorizes in advance Chugach’s recovery of all costs of the transaction through future rates. 

The RCA, recognizing the promise made in Proposition 10 and the full retreat from that promise made one year later in Chugach’s application, has taken the issue even further.  On pages 106 and 107 of the decision the RCA states the following.

“No Increase in Base Rates. Base rates for existing ML&P and Chugach Electric ratepayers would not increase as a result of the transaction.”  Proposition 10 includes the following provision: “No Increase in Base Rates.  Base rates for existing ML&P and Chugach Electric ratepayers would not increase as a result of the transaction.”

For the reasons discussed above, these prohibitions of base rate increases as a result of the transaction are inconsistent with our obligations and Chugach’s obligations under AS 42.05.  

We are specifically mandated by AS 42.05.431(a) to ensure that Chugach’s rates are sufficient to meet its debt covenants.  

We cannot allow Chugach to be subject to legal claims under Section 6.21(b) for specific performance of the requirements of Ordinance No. 2018-1(S) or Proposition 10, when such performance may put Chugach’s financial health at risk.  

To be clear, we declare under our authority in AS  42.05.141(a)(3) that any covenant by Chugach to comply with the rate provisions of Ordinance No. 2018-1(S) or Proposition 10 quoted above is an unreasonable practice that is void and unenforceable.

The case has been made, indeed mandated, by the RCA that base rates must rise despite all of the promises and ballot language that no such thing would occur.  These higher rates will be uniform from downtown Anchorage to Hope.

Ratepayers now need to be presented modeling showing what the average $100 per month electric bill will look like if this $1,000,000,000 sale is completed.  

Chugach ratepayers need to be informed of the environmental liability risk they will be assuming by taking on the ML&P properties.   

Issues not discussed in the RCA decision, such as the expansion of the CIRI Fire Island Wind Farm and the amount of the surcharge current ML&P ratepayers will be charged, must also be presented. 

I began this piece with a list of the issues addressed in the RCA’s decision but have only discussed the solemn promise to not increase base rates.  Each other issue carries with it an impact on the ratepayers and the taxpayers.

What the RCA approved is not what we voted on.  

An explanation needs to be forthcoming from our elected officials as to just what is going on here.  

And then another vote needs to be held on the current terms of the sale of ML&P to Chugach Electric.  The voters need to take another look.

Bob Maier is an Anchorage utility ratepayer who has provided testimony to both the RCA and the Anchorage Assembly on the sale of ML&P.  

Permanent Fund check: $992

32

The Alaska Department of Revenue announced the amount of the 2020 Permanent Fund dividend is $992.

Beginning July 1, an estimated 580,000 Alaskans, representing nearly 90 percent of PFD applicants, will receive their dividend by direct deposit or check.

The decision to distribute the PFD three months early was made by Gov. Mike Dunleavy in response to the economic impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic.

Alaskans who are determined eligible by June 19, 2020 and chose direct deposit will see funds in their bank accounts on or shortly after July 1. Eligible applicants receiving a paper check will have their checks in the mail starting on July 1.

Dividend applications that have not been determined by June 19 will be paid out on a monthly basis by check or direct deposit beginning July 23. This year, the Permanent Fund Dividend Division saw a record number of Alaskans sign their application electronically, at 92 percent.

Alaskans are encouraged to use the state’s website MyPFD to check the status of their PFD application.

2020 marks the 39th year Alaskans have received their share of the state’s natural resource wealth. Following the 2020 dividend payment, the estimated total of all funds disbursed to Alaskans, including the one-time 2007 Resource Rebate, will exceed $25 billion dollars.