Tuesday, December 30, 2025
Home Blog Page 1147

Judge denies Lance Pruitt a do-over for D-27 election

20

Republican Rep. Lance Pruitt lost in his court challenge of the flawed election in District 27.

Pruitt had claimed that the moving of a polling location and the lack of voter notification by the Division of Elections led to his loss. He was asking the court for a do-over or other remedy.

The Alaska Supreme Court said in a brief statement that Pruitt had not “met the burden” to overturn the election of Liz Snyder, the Democrat who had challenged Pruitt for the second time. But the actual reason the Supreme Court denied the challenge won’t be provided to the public by the justices for as long as two years.

Pruitt’s attorneys said that by not notifying voters of the polling location change, the Division of Elections had disenfranchised them. The State attorneys arguing for the Division said that the COVID-19 pandemic had made elections particularly tricky this past year, and they were doing their best.

Judge sides with Dunleavy on commission appointments, denies injunction

3

A Superior Court judge has refused to give the Legislative Council a preliminary injunction over a series of commission and other executive appointments that the Legislature never confirmed.

The 94 appointments the governor made, including the commissioner of Revenue, had not been approved by the Legislature when it gaveled out in May of 2020.

Technically, those appointments were to expire at the end of the year. But Dunleavy kept them. The lawsuit was to determine if he had the right to keep them, even though the Legislature did not perform its duty of holding confirmation votes.

Judge Pallenberg said that keeping the appointees in place has not caused irreparable harm to the authority of the Legislature, as the Legislative Council had claimed. Nor have any of the appointees committed some egregious act that has harmed the public welfare, and they’re not likely to over the next 11 days, before the Legislature convenes again.

“The injury complained of is an abstract one,” Pallenberg wrote of the Legislative Council’s argument.

“I am also not persuaded that this harm to the Legislature would exceed the harm that would result to the executive branch if the court abruptly removes 94 people from office, nor that the executive branch can be adequately protected against this harm,” Pallenberg wrote. The preliminary injunction was denied, but the case still remains to be decided by the court.

Murkowski says she may have to walk away from Republican Party

Sen. Lisa Murkowski stated today that if President Donald Trump doesn’t resign from office, she is not sure she has a place in the Republican Party.

Murkowski may be finally free to speak her mind, now that Ballot Measure 2 has passed, which many politicos believe make it far easier for her to win reelection. Murkowski might fare well under an open primary system if she registers as an undeclared or nonpartisan. She is up for re-election in 2022.

“I want him out. He has caused enough damage,” Murkowski told a reporter on Friday.

Alaska Republican Party Chairman Glenn Clary said he had not had a chance to discuss the issue with but welcomes the opportunity to do so.

“Lisa will have to do what Lisa thinks is best for her, and voters of Alaska will decide what’s best for them,” he said.

House Speaker Nancy Pelosi might give Murkowski an opportunity to once again vote on impeachment. Pelosi said that next week she may move to impeach Trump for the second time over what she said was his role in inciting a violent attack on the U.S. Congress in the U.S. Capitol.

Several House Republicans may this time support impeachment, which would be a first in history, as no president has been impeached twice, and none has been impeached during his final two weeks of office.

Pelosi told reporters today that she spoke with Gen. Mark Milley, the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, to discuss taking away the president’s access to the nuclear codes, to prevent him from detonating a bomb.

Felix Rivera kicks Jamie Allard off of chairmanship of Assembly Audit Committee

Anchorage Assemblywoman Jamie Allard wanted to do an independent audit of the CARES Act fund disbursement in Anchorage.

The next thing that happened was she was kicked off as chair of the Assembly Audit Committee, as she was coming out with the annual plan for the audit.

Chairman Felix Rivera “deplatformed” Allard from her role as head of audit, because he said he doesn’t like her tone. He replaced her with South Anchorage Assemblywoman Suzanne LaFrance.

Rivera has also censored Allard during Assembly meetings.

Rivera told Allard in an email message that, “I don’t appreciate your tone in replying Mr. Alex Slivka (Chief Fiscal Officer and chief adviser on the Corona Virus Relief Fund. “I believe this committee will be better served by having a more seasoned chair.” Allard is still a regular voting member of the committee.

Allard has question about what happened to the summer workers who worked on the trails, paid for with CARES Act funds, and what the Girdwood Clinic did with the money the Assembly awarded it.

Ronna McDaniel reelected chair of Republican Party

19

At the Republican Party’s winter meeting in Jacksonville, Fla, Ronna McDaniel was reelected chair of the party. She was unopposed. Under normal circumstances, the head of the RNC would be blamed for the loss of the presidential election and two Georgia Senate runoffs. But in this case, there is strong party support for McDaniel.

Many Republicans feel that COVID-19 brought chaos to the elections, and that not enough fraud was proven that it would have changed the outcome.

“Being chair of the Republican National Committee has been an honor of the lifetime, and I’m so honored to be re-elected. We have a lot of work to do heading into 2022 and I’m ready to make sure Republicans up and down the ballot have the resources they need to win!” she wrote.

Co-chair Tommy Hicks was also re-elected.

Representing Alaska at the four-day meeting at Amelia Island was Alaska Republican National Committeewoman Cynthia Henry of Fairbanks and party Finance Chairman Craig Campbell of Anchorage.

One item of discussion at the end of the meeting was the sudden statement by Sen. Lisa Murkowski, who said unless President Donald Trump resigned she doesn’t know if she has a future in the Republican Party.

What I saw at the revolution: ‘A mixture of anger and a lot of love for this country’

78

While the mainstream media and politicians are calling them extremists, rioters, and terrorists, that is not how one Alaskan saw the Save America rally-goers in Washington, D.C., which turned aggressive, ending in the death of one protester and the death of one member of the Capital Police.

Our traveler reported to Must Read Alaska at various times during the Save America protest in Washington, D.C. on Wednesday until the cell service in the District of Columbia was jammed by authorities in mid afternoon.

He takes exception to the media characterizing protesters as extremists, terrorists, or “a mob.” Most were peaceful, he said. Less than one percent were at the aggressive end of the scale.

“They were extremely patriotic,” he said. “They believe in the Constitution and they support the United States of America. We were praying, and thanking each other for coming and standing for the country.”

Our contact flew into Washington, D.C. the day before the rally. That night, he mingled with others who were arriving, and he got oriented to where the rally would be held the next day. He and his friends stood in line for 12 hours to get a close-up view of President Donald Trump, who was scheduled to speak to the rally-goers on Wednesday. The crowd size was over one million, he reported.

When asked if he felt Trump incited a riot, our contact said, “Absolutely not.” About three quarters of the way through Trump’s remarks, over one quarter of the people started walking toward the U.S. Capitol, where most people assumed there would be a peaceful march around the building.

One quarter of a million people was a big crowd converging on the Capitol. Our witness was at the end of a crowd of people over two miles long. The building was barricaded, and there was no way to march around it.

By the time our witness arrived, the barriers around the Capitol had already been broken down by the few at the front who were aggressive. Police had decided to just let people through.

The people behind the ones in front — tens of thousands of protesters — arrived at the Capitol not knowing there had ever been barriers to be broken. They thought the place was open, as police were letting them through. It was a bit of a festival-like atmosphere for a few minutes. Grandmothers, families, men and women, young and old, black, white, Samoan, and Asian filled the steps going up to one of the doors. It looked like a Trump rally. Our witness joined one woman who was praying for the police who were present.

Law enforcement alternated between lax and intense. There would be no evidence of law enforcement, and then all of a sudden tear gas was sprayed into the eyes of the protesters, and concussive blasts would go off, echoing between the buildings.

What our witness saw was mainly peaceful protesters, many who were praying, some on their knees. Others who made it into the Capitol acted with respect, staying within the velvet cords as they made their way.

“There were four kinds of people: People who were confused, not knowing what to do; people who were serious, and who were fervently praying; people who wanted to take part in something; and people who actively wanted to get into the Senate,” he said.

“It was a mixture of anger and a lot of love, love for this country,” our witness said. He is reluctant to give his name because he has seen reports that an FBI dragnet is underway to arrest people who attended the rally.

The scene became more chaotic. Our witness saw one man being carried down a set of stairs unconscious, and with urine-soaked jeans. A grandmother came toward our witness and said she was only there to defend the country for her grandchildren. Her eyes were burning with tear gas.

According to our witness, between 1,500 and 2,000 went into the building, with about 100 getting quite a ways inside.

“I heard yelling and all of a sudden a whole group of people started pushing to get out. They had been pepper sprayed.”

Most of the people were trying to prevent things from getting out of hand, he said.

“They chanted “Respect the house.” They were yelling “Don’t wreck anything, this is our house,” he reported.

“These Trump supporters are patriots and have been spending months and even years doing their own research,” he said. “Everybody was like a brother or sister, and they’ve been doing reporters’ jobs for months. Everybody was expecting to hear our path forward to continue our republic.”

“I did not meet one person at the Trump rally who thinks Democrat politicans are Americans. They’ve been bought by the CCP (Chinese Communist Party). They want to achieve an alternative form of government in the form of socialism.”

As our witness made his way back to Alaska, he was still somewhat stunned and emotionally drained by all he had witnessed. He is worried that the FBI is going to round up grandmothers who attended and charge them as terrorists. He is concerned that President Trump will be charged with sedition. And he is deeply worried about the future of the country under what he and millions others still view as a stolen election.

Art Chance: Preserving the Republican homeland

21

By ART CHANCE

Note: I wrote this in early 2007 as Barack Obama took office.   I was consistently a front-pager on RedState.com back in those days and this ran on the front page for weeks.  Substitute any reference to Barack Obama with Biden – Harris and it remains relevant.  Some of it is a little dated, as in nobody uses Blackberries anymore; back then they were the ultimate status symbol in government. – AC

The real Homeland exists in the states and local governments where Republicans still govern. Right now at the national level, we have no airspeed, no altitude, and no ideas. It’s going to be a while before we fly nationally. But, we do still govern about half the states and a lot of local governments. So, how do we defend this homeland?

First, a Republican officeholder in a safely Red state must understand that the fact that s/he has a good hold on his office doesn’t really mean much anymore.

Every office has been nationalized and that rag-tag band of greenies or union organizers that you could safely ignore in the past now have almost unlimited funds and the full power of the federal government behind them. So, here’s a to-do list for Red state officeholders.

Take out the trash! Get the holdover Democrats out of your government. Most state and local governments were either built by Democrats or model the federal government, which was built by Democrats.

No Republican could find enough loyal competent Republicans to fill all the political appointments in a Democrat-built government so they put their friends in the visible places and in places where they really need change and otherwise leave the government in the hands of Democrats.

Then they wonder why they’re constantly leaked, thwarted, and sabotaged. Now, when that a Republican got elected, some “friend” told him/her that he couldn’t fire too many people because it would be too disruptive and the government had to be kept running smoothly. That is an outright lie. The very hardest thing you could try to do is to stop a government from running. The only thing that was threatened with disruption was that “friend’s” contact list in the bureaucracy.

Fire everybody that you have a colorable legal right to fire, and a few extra just to show you can; God and the courts can sort it out. The left/media will whine and snivel about how the heartless Republicans savaged these dedicated public servants and they’ll probably have somebody’s wife with cancer who just lost her health insurance on the 6 pm news the night you do it. It’ll all be lies but in this game lies are better than the truth if you can get fools to believe them. You just stay the course, say you’re going in a new direction, and let them bleat and wail. The news cycle is very short and it won’t be long before a car chase, a missing baby, or a celebrity sex scandal chases those selfless former public servants off the news.

Don’t be coy about this and use Gov. Palin’s root canal over “Troopergate” as your what-not-to-do manual. The rule for true political appointees is “any reason, no reason, but not an illegal reason.” No reason is best; just say you’re going in a new direction and you’re putting in a new management scheme. And don’t do anything else. Every single wrongful or constructive discharge involving a high level employee I ever lost, I lost because somebody in management said to somebody, “I’m going to get that SOB.”

Positions are better left vacant than filled with holdover Democrats; the bureaucrats will keep it running just because it is easier to keep it running than to restart it if it is stopped. Governments run in spite of political appointees, not because of them. Most governments have a tool called “acting status” with which you can give the highest career ‘crat something like the pay of the fired appointee. They’ll appreciate it and appreciative people tend towards loyalty.

Use your limited supply of loyal competent Republicans to control the money, people, and stuff of the government and to run the places where you most need change. Do not put the general counsel of a horse breeding association in charge of a major function because he is a good ole boy who raised some money for somebody. You’ll have enough trouble without defending incompetence. Likewise, friends’ kids may be fine for decorating high-level offices but don’t give them real jobs.

Get unwired. Immediately prohibit all but de minimis personal use of government electronic resources such as computers, faxes, phones, PDAs, etc. and give notice that employees have no expectation of privacy in their use of such resources.

A blanket prohibition is pointless; your employees are going to take calls from their kids and get the grocery list by email; let them do it but the price is their grocery list, or the date they made, is a public record.

Put the best bad thoughts and bandwidth monitors you can buy on your IT systems and fire a few people for porn and gambling. Make smoke and noise doing it and you won’t have to do many. This won’t stop your employees from cc’ing their favorite reporter with a copy of a letter or memo, but it will make it harder for that reporter to use the leaked document. He’ll be forced to ask for it under your public records law so he has a legal copy to use, so you’ll know about the leak before you read it on the front page and can take necessary steps.

Stow the Blackberries. Direct your management that there will be no discussion of personnel or policy by email. Even cell phones are dangerous if you have powerful enemies; there are some really good scanners out there. Again, using Gov. Palin as an example of what not to do, the private account dodge is just that, a dodge and the only advantage it has is that it is easier to delete files. The fact that you deleted files is probably more damning than the files themselves, so bear that in mind. If you are a public officer, however you do the public’s business is the public’s business, and your stuff will come out. The best rule is to never put anything in an email that you don’t want to read on the front page of the paper that hates you most.

Stop the memos. You want trusted advisors and you make decisions in face to face or telephonic meetings with them. Briefing memos and decision memos are for leaking and for covering people’s butts. Nobody takes notes in your meetings and nobody writes one of those “set out my understanding of your decision” cover-your-butt memos after the meeting. The only time one of these memos gets written is when you want to leave it on a copier to spread disinformation.

Control the money. Most of the federal money you get is aimed at some Democrat constituency; always remember that you’re feeding the hand that bites you. Hire yourself a very good, non-political government accountant and listen to her. Republican officials are going to be under attack by federal auditors and investigators for the forseeable future; you don’t want to give them anything to work with.

Just understand, that it is almost impossible to fully comply, so if you get a disallowance or some beef with them, just buck up; you don’t have the power to call your Senator and get them off your back anymore.

Fire some of your friends. Because they had untrammelled power for 50 years, most of the ways that Democrats steal are nominally legal. Republicans have to steal the old fashioned way and some do. They’re usually pretty hamfisted about it and get caught; fire them and move on. If Duke Cunningham had been a Democrat, he’d have just set up a bunch of non-profits, earmarked a bunch of money to them, and had a good accountant who made sure his piece got raked off. He’d now be a respected multi-millionaire Senator instead of a convicted felon.

The other side of your being straight with the money, is that you can make the other guys be straight with the money. You are feeding all sorts of non-profits that hate you. Your government, through its labor, education, health and so-called services, and environmental conservation departments, and others sometimes, is giving grants and contracts to the people who hate you and work against you every day.

Find out who runs every outfit that you give a grant or contract to and cross reference who they contribute to and what political jobs they’ve had. You’ll probably find a goodly number of those Democrat holdovers you just fired working for them. You can’t just take away their grants and contracts because they’re a Democrat front, but you can make their lives interesting.

Audit all your contracts and grants. Make them file their reports; most can’t. They’ve never had to account for their expenditures, so they don’t usually have systems that allow them to keep adequate expenditure records. This is true of unions also, but that is another game and another diary. No expenditure and performance reports, no money. That’ll take them a while to overcome. Some of them will have been outright stealing.

If it is federal money, turn them over to the Department of Justice. DOJ won’t do anything to them in a Democrat administration, but you can rail about that, too. Just for the record, DOJ won’t do anything in a Republican administration either unless it is seven figures or somebody a holdover prosecutor really doesn’t like.

Do the work with government employees. I know this is anathema to Republicans, but Republicans got beaten in the outsourcing game. The Rs drove the out-sourcing iniatives and the Ds fought it but lost. The Rs thought the game was over. The Ds just set up non-profits and picked up the outsourced work. Government employees are usually little or no more expensive if all costs are considered and you can control them and keep them mostly out of politics. You have almost no control over a contractor’s employees.

Watch the stuff. Stealing stuff is easier than stealing money and corruption in government procurement has been legendary since time immemorial. The Egytians probably had miles of papyrus scrolls setting out the procurement codes. Fundamentally some poorly trained, poorly paid nameless, faceless procurement specialist or contract officer is tasked with dealing with some of the richest, most powerful, and most corrupt people in your state or city. His temptations are at least as great as those of the narcs and vice cops, and we know they’re all honest, don’t we? Keep a sharp eye on your procurement people. If they’re living beyond their means, they probably have other means and understand, it may well be one of your friends and contributers who is providing those other means. Put somebody in jail.

This is of necessity only bright colors and broad strokes. There are specialists out there who know the details. Republicans need to hire them and listen to them. We must be Caesar’s wife so Democrats’ minions can’t put us in jail or perp walk our friends and supporters. The added benefit of our being Caesar’s wife, is we can force the Democrat front groups to be Caesar’s wife and they can’t do it. They require graft and corruption to live. Clean it up and they can’t live – and that’s a good thing.

Art Chance is a retired Director of Labor Relations for the State of Alaska, formerly of Juneau and now living in Anchorage. He is the author of the book, “Red on Blue, Establishing a Republican Governance,” available at Amazon. 

State arguing that residency doesn’t matter in elections

17

Rep. Lance Pruitt, who lost by 11 votes to Liz Snyder in District 27, will be arguing on Friday that specific actions by the State of Alaska Division of Elections led to his loss. Those specific actions were that the Division didn’t notify voters in Precinct 915 that it had changed the voting location.

In a brief filed with the court, the State of Alaska is arguing to the Alaska Supreme Court that Pruitt’s claims are “false and reckless allegations against dozens of innocent voters …”

The State of Alaska’s brief strangely delves into a matter that is not actually part of the case, and asks the court to do something extraordinary: The State of Alaska is asking the court to clarify that post-election residency challenges cannot void an election. It is saying that research done by campaigns after an election cannot be used to void the results.

The State says that Pruitt’s team harassed voters by calling them after the election and asking them if they live in the district, and that Pruitt’s team combed through public records to see if voters had sold their homes and moved, making them voters in another district.

Pruitt’s team, in fact, found several who had voted in the district but who did not live there, including campaign staff for Rep.-elect Liz Snyder. But this portion of the election is not under appeal.

A reader would not know that, however, from the State’s brief filed before Friday’s Supreme Court hearing.

“He [Pruitt] accused a long list of voters—by name in public court filings—of wrongdoing. [R. 196, 314-15] Although Mr. Pruitt has since abandoned these claims, these voters’ names—and Mr. Pruitt’s accusations of them—remain in the public court file. The Court should discourage this kind of voter harassment and speculative accusations in future close elections by making clear that such residency claims cannot void an election.”

Some of the residency claims were resolved through further research, while others were not — enough to possibly change the election results.

What the State is arguing, however, is that a final election cannot be challenged based on residency once that election is certified.

“… the history of this case should inspire the Court to consider clarifying the law so that losing candidates have no incentive—in either an election contest or a recount appeal—to harass voters and comb through their property records after an election in an effort to void a close election result.”

In an earlier court hearing, Judge Josie Garton refused to place an emergency injunction on the election because she didn’t think that Pruitt’s case would win on appeal, and because, she stated, it is important that Liz Snyder be sworn into office this month, when the Legislature convenes in Juneau.

The State lawyers may be attempting to shift the focus from the lack of notification of the voting location to something else. But that something else may be asking the Supreme Court to do something that is on weak constitutional grounds, which is to say that legal research cannot be used to change an election outcome.

When do the people have a right to rebel against their government?

70

By BERNADETTE WILSON

For better or for worse, history has been made this week.

Lost in all the commotion is a most critical question that deserves a thoroughly contemplated answer.

Millions of Americans watched as our house, “the People’s House“ was breached and security fences torn down. Windows were bashed in and lives were lost, one of them being inside the U.S. Capitol Building itself, at the hands of an officer.

Social media erupted in debate as to who was to blame, as photos surfaced suggesting that a few of the rioters that spoiled it for the protesters, were actually Black Lives Matter and Antifa activists. 

It was heartbreaking. It was infuriating. And it was embarrassing, all at the same time.

Condemnation of the heinous acts was so prevalent, it makes one question how the Antifa riots continued in the fashion that they did in 2020 for as long as they did. Their riots lasted months. Admonishment was entirely warranted back then.

I read statements and social media comments stating that Republicans are the “party of law“ and that this was not the way to get real change. And I found myself agreeing.

Yet a question burned in my heart: What action does justify the American people storming their Capitol? What warrants a civil war?

I know what warranted a Civil War in the 1860s. I know how we justified the Revolutionary War.

But for Americans today, in the year 2021, what act is so egregious that it would justify a civil war? At what point is it acceptable to throw the tea into the harbor?

Alaska’s congressional delegation and Gov. Mike Dunleavy all issued statements admonishing the behavior of the rioters in Washington D.C. I can’t say I disagree with any of them.

But there is a burden on our elected officials to tell us, through their eyes, when is it OK for Americans to rebel?

Senator Lisa Murkowski, Senator Dan Sullivan, Congressman Don Young, and Gov. Dunleavy: What action could be so bad? Do the people ever have the right to overthrow their government? If so, when?

As elected officials, time and time again, you have told upset Americans to take their grief to the ballot box, but when the ballot box is broken, what do they do?

When the only vehicle that guarantees a say in all of their other freedoms is wiped away from them, what do they do? 

Republicans are not the party of law and peace, as too many have stated. We are the ones that led the Civil War. And thank God we did.

And for my fellow Alaskans, and Americans, most importantly this question should be asked of you. History shows the decision is yours.

No government entity, no citizen, wants to go to war with their neighbor. Yet the crusades took place, Joan of Arc went before us, a Revolutionary War and a Civil War were fought and every day, average Americans became heroes.

What we do know is the answer to the question of “when” is surely not “never.”

For the last 60+ years, Americans have subscribed to a mantra of “peace not war.” Was this the beginning of our conditioning by our government to give the government free rein?

Let me be very clear, I am not condoning a civil war. Nor is this “when” a question for which I have an answer.

What I am asking all of us is what I believe we owe each other: a considered conversation about what could be so egregious that a civil war or a government takeover by the people would be warranted?

We know it’s not the killing of millions of innocent babies. No civil war erupted after abortion became legal.

We know it’s not the stripping of our religious rights. Our churches were shut down in March of last year. Again, no war. 

Even our freedom of speech has been chipped away at dramatically. Yes, Facebook and Twitter are private companies and can do as they please. However the fact that they do not appreciate our American values of free speech, even to the extent that they silence our president, has sparked no nationwide violence. 

Prayer and the Pledge of Allegiance in our schools has been largely removed. 

Even the very heart of our republic – transparency and fair elections – are not egregious enough to constitute a civil war, society says. 

So what does? 

When a woman asked Benjamin Franklin as he left the Constitutional Convention, “What have you given us, Mr. Franklin?” he replied, “A republic, Madam, if you can keep it.”

And so a most critical question that deserves a thoroughly contemplated answer must be addressed : How will we keep it?

Bernadette Wilson is a business owner, mom, and civic leader in Anchorage.