By WIN GRUENING
Last week, during a scheduled Juneau City and Borough Assembly Finance Committee meeting, City and Borough of Juneau staff introduced the FY2024 draft budget for consideration. This was the first of many meetings examining the budget prior to final Finance Committee action on May 17 and adoption by the full Assembly on June 12th. In conjunction with the budget, the FY2024 millage rate and Capital Improvement Plan budget will also be adopted.
According to the City Manager’s Budget Message accompanying the presentation, the FY24 budget will break new ground with higher revenues and expenses than in any prior year in Juneau’s history.
Without question, impacts of continued inflation and lingering effects of the pandemic have contributed to a higher budget, but Assembly actions have also been a crucial factor.
Recurring FY24 expenditures are expected to grow by nearly $10.6 million over FY23. That increase is offset by revenues but doesn’t include $16.0 million of one-time spending, to be funded from the city’s unrestricted fund balance. That one-time expense includes $10 million for a proposed new city hall, bringing the total amount already appropriated for that project to $16.3 million.
The City Manager states a new city hall will substantially reduce CBJ’s long-term operating costs. He contends that current office space conditions are unacceptable and that the city’s continued rental of space is an inefficient use of the public dollar.
Yet, a bond issue for $35 million to partially pay for that project was turned down by voters last October. While that election wasn’t a yes/no vote on the City Hall project, per se, it was a pretty good indication that voters either don’t want to pay for it or that they believe there are better, less expensive options than new construction.
The CBJ Assembly, however, has taken the position that the electorate just doesn’t understand the benefits of a new city hall, so they are plowing ahead with the plan anyway and intend to spend $50,000 on a public campaign to “educate” voters.
Regardless of the fiscal gymnastics, whether the city pays cash or borrows the money, the full costs (both capital and operating) will be borne by taxpayers. It seems like the Assembly should be listening more closely to them. It’s not as if voters don’t believe city employees should have decent working conditions. Or, in the case of the proposed $75 million Capital Civic Center project, that arts and culture doesn’t play an important part in the quality of life in the community. Most voters do believe that.
But Juneau’s cost of living is also an integral and vital component of quality of life. Public projects that have indeterminate recurring costs and one-time expenditures that have outsize impacts on the budget must be balanced against the need to keep basic living expenses low. Food and housing prices and taxes need to be within a range that encourages economic development and attracts new residents, thereby allowing the tax base to grow organically.
Unfortunately, Juneau’s demographic trends are working against this. With school-age and working-age population dwindling, required taxes will continue to increase at the individual level making it even more expensive to live in Juneau.
A look at the latest increase in Juneau’s residential property tax assessments shows how this is beginning to play out. 2023 assessments increased nearly 16% for single-family homes. In response, the City Manager has recommended a reduction in the millage rate of .28 mills, from 10.56 to 10.28. Any reduction is welcome, but that is trivial in comparison to the increase in city revenue. For example, if a property assessment went from $475,000 to $550,000, the owner will pay, and the city will gain, an additional $638 in taxes next year. That is only $154 less than would be paid without the millage rate reduction – less than a quarter of what the city gains through increased valuation.
In other words, the proposed millage rate decrease is minor compared to what property owners will shell out and the city collects in increased taxes. That difference is what is funding the 2023 budget increase.
But the city can claim it is “reducing taxes” and the budget is “balanced.”
You be the judge.
After retiring as the senior vice president in charge of business banking for Key Bank in Alaska, Win Gruening became a regular opinion page columnist for the Juneau Empire. He was born and raised in Juneau and graduated from the U.S. Air Force Academy in 1970. He is involved in various local and statewide organizations.
Win Gruening: Legislature dives into perilous waters with state workforce, retirement issues
Win Gruening: Education funding is complicated, political
Reasons for ballot rejection: Signatures, postmarks
Win Gruening: Juneau muni elections outcome should give the Assembly pause about new City Hall
Win Gruening: Juneau muni elections outcome should give the Assembly pause about new City Hall
Win Gruening: Juneau muni elections outcome should give the Assembly pause about new City Hall
Win Gruening: School boards must learn to adapt to changing demographics
