By WIN GRUENING
Leading up to Juneau’s Oct. 4 municipal election, arguments for and against several ballot propositions dominated social media, Juneau Empire pages, radio airwaves, and yard signs. Candidates on the ballot ran unopposed which focused even more attention on ballot issues.
It’s rare when an Assembly-sponsored bond proposition doesn’t pass muster with the electorate and even more uncommon when a city and borough ordinance is repealed by voters. But both of those outcomes have come to pass.
Two of the four ballot issues, Proposition #1 and Proposition #4, were the subject of some controversy. The first authorized issuance of $35,000,000 in general obligation bond debt to partially pay for construction of a new City Hall and the second repealed recently enacted CBJ Code requiring disclosure of prices realized in private real estate transactions.
The first round of election results showed the new City Hall funding losing narrowly and the repeal of real estate disclosure passing narrowly – both by less than 1%. Later mail-in votes widened those margins considerably. It’s virtually impossible now for any remaining outstanding votes to change the end result.
City leaders need to ask themselves, what happened?
The last several years of Covid relief have effectively masked deficit spending that has proceeded unchecked at City Hall and allowed the Juneau Assembly to delay taking the necessary steps that would balance revenues and expenditures. Instead, city leaders have ignored the growing concern of taxpayers over the mounting list of expensive projects being promoted along with the recent steep escalation in commercial and residential property taxes.
Juneau’s economy has also shifted somewhat over the past two years. Voters have found it hard to ignore the vacant commercial office space and the number of empty storefronts, not to mention Juneau’s stagnant population and dwindling school enrollment.
With that as a backdrop, the Assembly and city staff rationale for a brand-new city hall with a $42 million price tag apparently did not reassure voters. The city’s own financial analysis indicated it would take 52 years to break-even and that was based on a lower construction cost and smaller bond amount than presented to voters.
Mandatory real estate disclosure, while not a tax measure or an authorization for expenditures, also failed to resonate with the public. Many voters rejected the Assembly-passed mandatory real estate disclosure because it was viewed as an over-reach and invasion of privacy (Juneau would have been the only city in Alaska with this requirement) coupled with a public distrust of city tax assessment policies.
City staff explanations that mandatory disclosure would “equalize” property taxes and make them “more fair” did not convince property owners after many saw their tax bill increase dramatically and may have suffered through a long, contentious, and unsuccessful tax assessment appeal process.
Election results were probably also influenced by the Assembly’s single-minded determination to continue spending public funds on planning for a new ($77 million) civic center that included a grandiose arts and cultural facility component despite a less expensive project being rejected by voters in 2019. This could explain some voters’ reluctance to approve additional spending elsewhere.
Will this election be a wake-up call for the Juneau Assembly?
Expenditure reductions, facility consolidations or closures, and elimination of sales tax exemptions should top the Assembly agenda before consideration of expensive replacements to city buildings serving staff and arts patrons.
Most importantly, economic development should be a high-priority topic at the Juneau Assembly’s next annual retreat on Dec. 11. Years ago, the CBJ out-sourced economic development to the Juneau Economic Development Council which has been generously funded.
But, as noted in Mark Lautman’s book, “When the Boomers Bail,” economic development is not simple. Lautman posits that almost everything that economic development specialists have traditionally promoted will be mostly useless in the coming decades. Shifting demographics, the lack of a properly educated workforce and competition to attract qualified talent will challenge even the most prosperous communities.
City leaders can meet this challenge by focusing more on growing the economy and less on growing the budget.
An expanded economy has always proven to be the key to avoid saddling taxpayers with unnecessary taxes and debt.
After retiring as the senior vice president in charge of business banking for Key Bank in Alaska, Win Gruening became a regular opinion page columnist for the Juneau Empire. He was born and raised in Juneau and graduated from the U.S. Air Force Academy in 1970. He is involved in various local and statewide organizations.
Reasons for ballot rejection: Signatures, postmarks
Win Gruening: A poetic moment in Alaska history, with Don Young and Nick Begich III
Win Gruening: Juneau’s hard municipal election choices — no, yes, no, yes
They will build it, anyway. Leftists have an”edifice complex” gotta build monuments to themselves. But not plan a way to maintain them.
Every dime goes to hire an assistant to the assistant’s assistant….. union happy for dues…….. No planning on building maintenance because we can bond for that. At only a latte a month per the mainstream super spreader shame narrative control.
Chuck! Fantastic comment above. So true of that Juneau Bunch, (makes me long for the old dirty dozen).
They will have their “edifice”, whether it’s atop the Main Street Parking Garage or somewhere in the Sub-Port area. The Juneau Junta always gets what it wants.
Sadly, Win’s wisdom above will pass as quickly as a Taku Gust down Seward Street! Hold on!
Like the supposed “rightists” don’t have a propensity to throw government dough at dumb and unnecessary projects? Check out the boondoggles advanced by the Alaska Industrial and Export Authority (“AIDEA”), in Alaksa, that include sub-optimal roads for entities located in Canada or other places. There is a great deal of spending unnecessarily on dim-bulb projects across the political spectrum.
Win’s points are on target. The campaign to build a new city hall in Juneau was turned down by the voters for a lot of obvious reasons, not least being providing a nifty new home for bureaucrats is not believed to be a priority. The CBJ Assembly says housing for humans is a huge issue. So what do they do? Float a proposal to borrow a pile of money that doesn’t address human housing and instead provides a new clubhouse for bureaucrats. Interestingly enough, there was no organized campaign to stop this borrowing scheme. The supposedly liberal electorate in Juneau figured out all by themselves that borrowing millions that didn’t include the full cost of the proposed project was not in the public interest and inconsistent with the stated goals and values articulated by the CBJ Assembly.
What is really interesting, post-election, is whether the CBJ Assembly will actually consider what happened and whether there are lessons to be learned. Odds are, they will not. Give it a year and a slightly modified proposal to build a new city hall will get floated and maybe even pass. That’s been the course a number of capital project proposals have followed over the years. Lose, give it a rest, tweak the proposal and run it up the flagpole again and citizens will get worn down and acquiesce to the will of the bureaucracy is the tried-and-true pattern. Time will tell, but the likelihood that the CBJ Assembly will actually take stock and apply the rejection of the City Hall proposal by the citizens is low.
Win, you’ve lived here long enough to know they’ll build it anyway.
Comments are closed.