By WIN GRUENING
Last week’s Juneau School District Board of Education meeting, expected to be perfunctory, was far from routine.
The Thursday, March 7 special meeting was called for the first reading of the adoption of the FY 2025 Budget. The budget had been hammered out after months of many long (sometimes contentious) meetings needed to reach consensus on how to deal with the potentially crushing structural deficit facing the district.
The final budget incorporated a plan to close three schools and consolidate grades 9-12 at Juneau-Douglas High School (JDHS), consolidate grades 7-8 at Thunder Mountain High School (THMS), and move grade 6 back to neighborhood elementary schools. The plan was approved by the Board by a 5-2 vote on February 23, but merging the two high schools had been seriously considered since January.
Despite that, dissident board members, led by board member Amber Frommhertz, supported a motion to consider an amendment to that plan at their next regularly scheduled meeting on Tuesday, March 12. The amendment (which eventually passed 4-3 with Sorenson, Mackey and Siddon dissenting) did not provide details or state its purpose but it later became apparent that it was laying the groundwork for consideration of a grade 7-12 plan that would keep both high schools open by adding middle school grades into JDHS and TMHS.
Frommhertz and board members supporting her motion claimed there was a lack of transparency in the board process and that “additional information” needed to be considered before budget final approval. However, they were either unwilling or unable to present that information during the meeting.
The contention that the public process was flawed is belied by the facts. JSD held fifteen public meetings on the budget since January 9. Input was solicited through multiple community and staff engagement meetings. Almost 600 responses were received to the JSD Budget Survey. JSD launched a public budget newsletter supplementing public announcements on the district web page and social media. Superintendent Hauser was available at all public meetings to answer questions.
What no one could explain is how, in the few days remaining before Tuesday’s meeting, a fully researched budget with reliable numbers can be produced for new configuration models when it took weeks to flesh out the details and fiscal impacts of the currently approved model.
Ironically, Frommhertz admitted during the meeting that she hadn’t had time to review all the information presented for the current model and was having problems following it. Yet, she apparently has no difficulty presenting a brand-new budget for two different models to board members on Tuesday with even less time to review it or consider it for approval.
This new plan, if adopted, would completely reverse the reorganization model presented to the Juneau City and Borough Assembly. This is not insignificant as the board must provide a balanced budget by March 15 to leave enough time to meet state statutory deadlines.
Timelines aside, under a 7-12 model, high school and middle school students crammed into the same building would be forced to compete for gym and library time, and seats in the lunchroom.
Besides the problematic logistical and social issues created by sending this year’s 6th and 7th graders to a school populated by 18-year-old seniors, the 7-12 plan will exacerbate a glaring problem that previous Juneau school boards have neglected to formally acknowledge.
Dilution of core course offerings and electives has plagued both Juneau high schools for years but has been ignored until now. Scores of students are required to take correspondence courses or summer school to graduate because classes are full or not offered. But combining our two high schools means their teachers would be under one roof. This will result in more core class availability and more Advanced Placement (AP) and Career & Technology Education (CTE) electives.
Changing to an unvetted dual high school configuration that houses as many as six different grades in each building with only days to evaluate the financial, educational, and social consequences is foolhardy.
Protecting one high school at the expense of Juneau’s middle school students is not the way forward.
The Juneau School Board can get back on track by adopting the currently approved budget plan, a plan that has been scrutinized thoroughly with input from all stakeholders through a deliberate process.
After retiring as the senior vice president in charge of business banking for Key Bank in Alaska, Win Gruening became a regular opinion page columnist for the Juneau Empire. He was born and raised in Juneau and graduated from the U.S. Air Force Academy in 1970. He is involved in various local and statewide organizations.
I was going to commend the Juneau School Board for doing what’s right. Seems like that wasn’t the plan all along….
You can’t be surprised.
Saddened? Yes.
Dismayed? Yes.
Disgruntled? Yes.
Disgusted? Yes.
Surprised? Not even slightly
When your utility bill arrives, requesting a postponement from AEL&P while you sort out your finances won’t happen. Similarly, the school board cannot delay action by claiming they need more time to assess the current model’s information. The colossal shortfall is a significant financial challenge that demands immediate attention. The school board members’ elected and sworn-in duties are being disregarded by postponing resolution, neglecting accountability, and failing to prevent future occurrences.
The time has come to take decisive action, identify those responsible, and implement all necessary measures to stabilize the budget. This will involve difficult decisions such as school closures and administrative layoffs. However, restoring financial stability to our schools is imperative now!
Our children and their families deserve nothing less!
Juneau stays off course.
There, fixed the headline.
Comments are closed.