The witch-hunt against doctors prescribing early treatment for Covid has begun

And you know she’s doing this out of the goodness of her heart……

Is Dr. Leslie Gonsette’s middle name “Karen”? Maybe the State should ban travel to the state by anyone questioning “The Party Line”? As with most medications, the longer that they are in use the less effective they are in regards to their initial promotion. Several have been removed from the market even after full approval by the FDA for lesser complications. The “vaccines” , by studies, appear to lose effectiveness rather quickly. Long term effects are still uncertain. Should serious long term side-effects be discovered, how will the proponents of vaccination defend their actions? A major question is whether the literature has gone through appropriate peer review or been subject to peer censorship?

“First they came . . .” by Martin Niemoller

First they came for the Socialists, and I did not speak out—
Because I was not a Socialist.

Then they came for the Trade Unionists, and I did not speak out—
Because I was not a Trade Unionist.

Then they came for the Jews, and I did not speak out—
Because I was not a Jew.

Then they came for me—and there was no one left to speak for me.

— Martin Niemöller

All this talk of the majority always being right, mainstream this and that.. Don’t they know that a majority of the German people voted for Adolf Hitler? COVID is about killing uniqueness and individuality.

Please, move to LA for the sake of all of us in Alaska. The “sound advice” they are following has led to the untimely deaths of many from being ventilated. All these people care about is their stature within the community. These are shallow excuses for human beings.

Now that the truth has been revealed about the failed protocol the mainstream doctors are taking, they want to double down on it anyways. This only reveals that they are activists for their own beliefs rather than people who actually care about the health and wellbeing of others.
I am happy I do not participate in the medical system in any way. Not even Tylenol.
I am super healthy and have TONS of stamina.
The system is going down and they are hanging on to a sinking ship.
We The People, are our own life boats.

Good bye medical mafia.

Ugg.

So one doctor is calling for punishment and censure for physicians who don’t share her diagnosis on patients she’s likely never seen?

Guess she skipped medical ethics class. Or considered herself above it.

I’ve heard people like Porcaro object vigorously over nazi comparisons, despite their obvious validity. Wonder if their mindsets will change when their doctors get punished or their treatments of choice are denied for partisan political reasons.

Still clinging to the fiction Alaska is conservative?

EVERY article I’ve read is missing critical data necessary to make informed decisions about masks or vaccines.
At point of hospital intake the following data should be collected:
     date
     age
1)  date/brand of last shot
2)  date/brand of first shot
3)  date/brand of booster shot
4)  admitted to ICU or general?
5)  volunteer auditability?
The same data sans ICU/general should also be collected at point of vaccination and should be available in real-time.
Both datasets should be auditable by the 4th estate.
Federal dollars should be used to ensure data is collected correctly without becoming a profit center for for-profit hospitals.
If medical experts can reasonably distinguish cases where primary cause of intake is something else that process should be formalized so everyone is capturing the same data.
This data should be available as soon as Covid is confirmed and federal dollars should provide the necessary resources to ensure accurate testing occurs in less than 24 hours or some economically practical time window.
IF sewer monitoring can be shown to have a reasonable degree of accuracy that data should be collected and reported daily. Otherwise capturing non-hospitalization infection rates is never going to be useful since it cannot be statistically accurate within any reasonable degree of error.
The data above can then be used in apples to apples comparison as we decide on mask and/or vaccine mandates.
So far the “professionals” have not bothered to collect and disseminate actionable data. The only solid data to date is that two weeks on a ventilator costs over 400 thousand dollars. The vax is around a thousand per shot, and the pill will be close to that.
To make matters worse, the medical “Karens” are suppressing any voice different than what has become the politically correct one. Dr. Leslie Gonsette is but the tip of the iceberg.
It’s no wonder the public believes that it’s all about big pharma’s outrageous profits, kickbacks, bribes, and hiding the real facts.

Obviously Gonsette gets her info from the MSM.
Anti-Science goose-stepper.

Excerpt – “At the time of writing, the UK’s 422 deaths and 8,077 known cases give an apparent death rate of 5 percent. This is often cited as a cause for concern, contrasted with the mortality rate of seasonal flu, which is estimated at about 0.1 percent. But we ought to look very carefully at the data. Are these figures really comparable?
Most of the UK testing has been in hospitals, where there is a high concentration of patients susceptible to the effects of any infection. As anyone who has worked with sick people will know, any testing regime that is based only in hospitals will over-estimate the virulence of an infection. Also, we’re only dealing with those COVID-19 cases that have made people sick enough or worried enough to get tested. There will be many more unaware that they have the virus, with either no symptoms, or mild ones.
That’s why, when Britain had 590 diagnosed cases, Sir Patrick Vallance, the government’s chief scientific adviser, suggested that the real figure was probably between 5,000 and 10,000 cases, 10 to 20 times higher. If he’s right, the headline death rate due to this virus is likely to be 10 to 20 times lower, say 0.25 percent to 0.5 percent. That puts the COVID-19 mortality rate in the range associated with infections like flu.”
John Lee is a recently retired professor of pathology and a former NHS consultant pathologist. The full article was originally published in The Spectator’s UK magazine.

Excerpt – “The simplest way to judge whether we have an exceptionally lethal disease is to look at the death rates. Are more people dying than we would expect to die anyway in a given week or month? Statistically, we would expect about 51,000 to die in Britain this month. At the time of writing, 422 deaths are linked to COVID-19 — so 0.8 percent of that expected total. On a global basis, we’d expect 14 million to die over the first three months of the year. The world’s 18,944 coronavirus deaths represent 0.14 percent of that total. These figures might shoot up but they are, right now, lower than other infectious diseases that we live with (such as flu). Not figures that would, in and of themselves, cause drastic global reactions.
Initial reported figures from China and Italy suggested a death rate of 5 percent to 15 percent, similar to Spanish flu. Given that cases were increasing exponentially, this raised the prospect of death rates that no healthcare system in the world would be able to cope with. The need to avoid this scenario is the justification for measures being implemented: the Spanish flu is believed to have infected about one in four of the world’s population between 1918 and 1920, or roughly 500 million people with 50 million deaths. We developed pandemic emergency plans, ready to snap into action in case this happened again.
At the time of writing, the UK’s 422 deaths and 8,077 known cases give an apparent death rate of 5 percent. This is often cited as a cause for concern, contrasted with the mortality rate of seasonal flu, which is estimated at about 0.1 percent. But we ought to look very carefully at the data. Are these figures really comparable?
Most of the UK testing has been in hospitals, where there is a high concentration of patients susceptible to the effects of any infection. As anyone who has worked with sick people will know, any testing regime that is based only in hospitals will over-estimate the virulence of an infection. Also, we’re only dealing with those COVID-19 cases that have made people sick enough or worried enough to get tested. There will be many more unaware that they have the virus, with either no symptoms, or mild ones.
That’s why, when Britain had 590 diagnosed cases, Sir Patrick Vallance, the government’s chief scientific adviser, suggested that the real figure was probably between 5,000 and 10,000 cases, 10 to 20 times higher. If he’s right, the headline death rate due to this virus is likely to be 10 to 20 times lower, say 0.25 percent to 0.5 percent. That puts the COVID-19 mortality rate in the range associated with infections like flu.
John Lee is a recently retired professor of pathology and a former NHS consultant pathologist. The full article was originally published in The Spectator’s UK magazine.