Tuesday, September 23, 2025
Home Blog Page 75

Alex Gimarc: The greens are in control of Chugach Electric, so now what?

By ALEX GIMARC

Suzanne Downing’s article on the most recent Board election of the Chugach Electric Association got me thinking, usually a dangerous, painful action.  

If the Alaska Center and the Renewable Energy Alaska Project (REAP), two sides of the same coin, now are in charge of the Chugach Board of Directors, what is it that they have actually won? Are they in position to do some actual damage to energy here in Southcentral, or are they in the same position that a dog that has been chasing vehicles up and the down the streets for years after he finally catches one? What do they do next?

With any luck, it will be the latter, though I expect they will make every attempt to do the wrong thing, supporting the most expensive, the least efficient, the most unstable, the least reliable, and the least environmentally friendly generation choices humanly possible. Yes, this means renewables.

Their problem is that the climate change world has changed. It started changing Nov 5, and that change has only accelerated since Jan 20, Inauguration Day.  

We discovered several things over that time. First, and most importantly, is that climate change and all renewable projects (renewables for renewables sake) ended up being  simply a form of grift, where tens of billions of dollars were disbursed to build all manner of wind and solar projects, most of which were expensive failures from a generation standpoint, but spectacular success in putting money in the pockets of donors to future democrat election campaigns. Rural broadband is similar grift here in Alaska.  

That is what the $93 billion in grants, loans and commitments pushed out of the Department of Energy over a period of 76 days following Trump’s election is all about. In its previous 15 years, the Loans Programs Office committed only $42 billion.  

It was that money that the renewables advocates on the Chugach Board were counting on to fund their hoped for large solar and large wind projects in the MatSu. That money is gone, and won’t be back for at least three years, if not longer.  

What to do next? One observation is that we are now hearing noises from the Alaska Center / REAP crowd about their support of “all forms of energy,” a mix of generation sources all happily playing together in the same generation portfolio. You’ve got to give these guys credit for turning on a dime and changing their message in near real time.

But what does all forms of energy really mean?  For one thing, it means we are going to be seeing reactors, small modular Generation IV (GenIV) reactors in Alaska. The first one will show up at Eielson Air Force Base courtesy of the congressional delegation. The Trump Administration is pushing small modular reactors, particularly at military bases, so we will be seeing a lot of them. I could envision several more in Alaska, all sited at military bases. Of course, the Alaska Center / REAP crowd managed to defeat the two board candidates knowledgeable of and willing to consider reactors.

The other thing we have in the not-so-distant future is a natural gas pipeline of some sort from the Slope. How long that takes is anyone’s guess, but I think we are a lot closer than we have been in years.  

What does the new landscape look like? Big Wind and Big Solar are off the table for years. Reactors and natural gas are on the table. While I would personally like coal, coal to liquids (Fischer Tropsch, CTL) and gas to liquids (Fischer Tropsch GTL) on the table, I’ll take what I can get.  

Three additional observations for your consideration.  

The first is that wind farms operate by virtue of waivers allowing them to kill large numbers of birds. Remove those waivers, better yet simply treat them like we currently treat natural gas and oil exploration, and they can no longer operate.

Second, is that wind turbines and solar arrays are notoriously difficult to recycle. Today, they are simply dumped. The 2023 photo at the top of this column is a wind turbine dump in Sweetwater Texas (Texas Monthly.) Somewhere along the line, this toxic waste will need to be dealt with.

Finally, all is not lost, as battery technology is moving very quickly.  While it is not good enough yet to be economically viable on a regional basis, that technology is making large strides. Given Tesla’s commercial involvement in this field, nothing 4-5 years down the road would surprise me. I would expect home-sized battery backup will become economically viable first.  

The Alaska Center and REAP managed to catch their prize. We are about to find out if they are smart enough to operate in the Brave New World of 2025. 

Happily, whatever happens, there will be another board election next year for at least two board members.  

Alex Gimarc lives in Anchorage since retiring from the military in 1997. His interests include science and technology, environment, energy, economics, military affairs, fishing and disabilities policies. His weekly column “Interesting Items” is a summary of news stories with substantive Alaska-themed topics. He was a small business owner and Information Technology professional.

Alexander Dolitsky: It takes courage to confront antisemitism and terrorism

By ALEXANDER DOLITSKY

Courage is the ability to face fear, discomfort or danger. It is about acting in the face of adversity, whether that’s physical hardship, moral opposition, or personal loss. Essentially, courage is about doing what is necessary even when it’s difficult or scary.

An example of courage is when someone speaks up against injustice or stands up for their beliefs and values, even if it means facing opposition or potential consequences. This could involve refusing to go along with a group that is doing something wrong, or simply helping others in need.

Historically, the famous “Dreyfus Affair” exemplified a courage and determination that tore through late 19th century France and rocked the country’s claim of “Liberty, Equality and Fraternity.” It was the Dreyfus Affair that convinced Theodore Herzl, the founder of Political Zionism, of the need for a Jewish state, which became a reality in 1948 with the creation of Israel by the United Nations.

The “Dreyfus Affair” was an espionage trial that took place in France in 1894. Captain Alfred Dreyfus, a Jewish officer, was convicted of treason for allegedly passing military secrets to the Germans. He was sentenced to a solitary confinement for life on the Devil’s Island, France’s notorious penal colony off the remote coast of South America. How could this happen in 19th century France, in which Jews had been equal citizens?

On Jan. 13, 1898, the most famous front page in the history of journalism appeared in a French paper L’Aurore (Aurora) beneath a two-word headline: “J’accuse” (I accuse!). In a long and fearless article, France’s leading novelist, Emile Zola (1840-1902), accused the French government of having orchestrated the conviction of an innocent man, Alfred Dreyfus.

Zola’s brave article immediately caused French society to split into Dreyfusards and anti-Dreyfusards. At the heart of the Dreyfus Affair was a toxic and rapidly growing anti-Semitism in France. In fact, the Dreyfus Affair and anti-Semitism in France contributed greatly to the rise of Jewish political leader Theodor Herzl and Zionist movement. Thus, Zionism was a nationalist and political movement that advocated for the establishment and maintenance of a Jewish state in the historic Land of Judea (Israel).

Zola’s intention in publishing “I accuse!” was to provoke the French government to prosecute him for libel, so that the emerging and exculpatory facts of the Dreyfus case could be, for the first time, publicly heard. Accordingly, he was tried, convicted, and sentenced to jail for his provocative (courageous) act—a penalty Zola evaded by urgently fleeing abroad.

In short, in 1898, the prolific writer Emile Zola took a courageous stance in defense of the falsely accused Dreyfus and was himself threatened with imprisonment. As a result, he urgently fled to England to avoid incarceration, without luggage, without sufficient resources, and unable to speak fluent English. Dreyfus was finally vindicated in 1906 or four years after Zola’s death in 1902.

Indeed, the patterns of history tend to repeat. Today’s pro-Palestinian and anti-Israel rhetoric masks deep-rooted antisemitism in our country and worldwide, regardless of who advocates either for or against Israel, or those who demand a release of remaining Jewish hostages that are still been held in the tunnels of Gaza by Hamas terrorists.

My good and long-time friend, via private correspondence, had a courage and intelligence to clearly assess the situation in our country, regarding the subject matter and a lack of courage on the part of American Jewry in confronting antisemitism:

“It really is surprising how silent most Jews seem today about all the widespread antisemitism sweeping the United States and Europe. Your Juneau synagogue does not seem unusual in that respect. I suppose so many Jews, at least in the United States, find it confusing to be so strongly committed to the Democrat party and then see that party embrace the “Palestinian” cause, even with its extreme and violent antisemitism. Maybe that’s an example of how we can become some political self-image of who they are. (‘I’m a liberal Democrat,’ cries my brother as he spouts the latest party talking points taken without question from Democrat politicians). But, wow, you’d think a lot of Jews would be questioning their unswerving allegiance to a political party in this case, by now. Your points [in the article ‘Free Palestine’ is a call to destroy Israel and exterminate Jews‘] about the historical background of Mideastern nations is an important perspective, too. As very few people alive today (including myself) know anything about that history and simply assume that all those nations have had very long histories as such, like so many of the major nations of the world. If it weren’t for all the petroleum in that region, all those “nations” would still be poor and ‘backward’ (primitive, undeveloped). But even though Israel has real and very long historical claims to its “homeland” and nationhood there, they are at a disadvantage of being a minority; peaceful religion surrounded by religious fanatics of an especially violent religion and basically having been given their land by a political fiat at the end of World War II. I don’t see how today’s politics cannot be terribly upsetting to any Jewish person anywhere in the world.”

Clearly, “Free Palestine” is not just a slogan, it is a genocidal call echoing the darkest chapters of history. It takes courage for all peace-seeking people, regardless of their political and religious affiliations, to stand proudly against this terrorist organization, its virulent movement and antisemitic agenda.

Alexander Dolitsky was born and raised in Kiev in the former Soviet Union. He received an M.A. in history from Kiev Pedagogical Institute, Ukraine in 1976; an M.A. in anthropology and archaeology from Brown University in 1983; and enrolled in the Ph.D. program in anthropology at Bryn Mawr College from 1983 to 1985, where he was also lecturer in the Russian Center. In the USSR, he was a social studies teacher for three years and an archaeologist for five years for the Ukrainian Academy of Sciences. In 1978, he settled in the United States. Dolitsky visited Alaska for the first time in 1981, while conducting field research for graduate school at Brown. He then settled first in Sitka in 1985 and then in Juneau in 1986. From 1985 to 1987, he was U.S. Forest Service archaeologist and social scientist. He was an Adjunct Assistant Professor of Russian Studies at the University of Alaska Southeast from 1985 to 1999; Social Studies Instructor at the Alyeska Central School, Alaska Department of Education and Yukon-Koyukuk School District from 1988 to 2006; and Director of the Alaska-Siberia Research Center from 1990 to 2022. From 2006 to 2010, Alexander Dolitsky served as a Delegate of the Russian Federation in the United States for the Russian Compatriots program. He has done 30 field studies in various areas of the former Soviet Union (including Siberia), Central Asia, South America, Eastern Europe and the United States (including Alaska). Dolitsky was a lecturer on the World Discoverer, Spirit of Oceanus, and Clipper Odyssey vessels in the Arctic and Sub-Arctic regions. He was a Project Manager for the WWII Alaska-Siberia Lend Lease Memorial, which was erected in Fairbanks in 2006. Dolitsky has published extensively in the fields of anthropology, history, archaeology and ethnography. His more recent publications include Fairy Tales and Myths of the Bering Strait Chukchi, Ancient Tales of KamchatkaTales and Legends of the Yupik Eskimos of SiberiaOld Russia in Modern America: Living Traditions of the Russian Old Believers in AlaskaAllies in Wartime: The Alaska-Siberia Airway During World War IISpirit of the Siberian Tiger: Folktales of the Russian Far EastLiving Wisdom of the Russian Far East: Tales and Legends from Chukotka and Alaska, and Pipeline to Russia: The Alaska-Siberia Air Route in World War II.

Paul Fuhs: Sustainable energy conference struck a balance that protesters somehow missed

By PAUL FUHS

There have been several editorials lately that call out the Governor’s Sustainable Energy conference as having “left out” information and supported only the state’s fossil fuel assets.

As the sponsor of a geothermal hydrogen project in the Aleutians, this outlook couldn’t be further from the truth. Did the writers of these criticisms actually attend the conference?

I found it to be really balanced with most of the panels focused on technological breakthroughs in alternative energy. I found the section on geothermal energy particularly useful, and of course we have many potential geothermal projects that are under development.

Perhaps what the writers found distasteful was the press coverage on the three energy related secretaries who travelled to Alaska at the invitation of Gov. Mike Dunleavy, an unprecedented accomplishment.

While support was shown for all the alternative energies, we have to accept the fact that our economy is strongly supported by the oil and gas industry and is the source of our incredible Alaska Permanent Fund, which just reached a record $83 billion in value. In addition to earnings from investments, the oil industry still contributes over $100 million to the fund every year.

This oil industry funded fund now provides a majority of state funding for critical state services, while allowing Alaskans to benefit from them without having to pay taxes. In addition, the oil industry represents about one third of the jobs in Alaska.

Incredibly, one of the writers stated that “the people of Alaska drive the economy, not some outside corporations.”  Excuse me for saying this, but without these ‘outside’ companies, the ‘people’ wouldn’t even have a job.

Likewise, there were protesters near the conference.  I saw one banner, held up by well-meaning people saying “Extraction is not our way of life.”  I guess this was intended to drive a wedge between industrial development and subsistence hunting. Did they ever stop to think if the moose, caribou or salmon that they killed consider themselves to be extracted?

Of course, the human race has “extracted” resources throughout time on earth, or we wouldn’t even be here.

Criticizing the Sustainable Energy conference with such arguments is just pure foolishness.  Alaskans and the whole world will need the energy resources that Alaska represents, and we shouldn’t be discriminating against any of them.  The conference certainly didn’t.

Paul Fuhs is former Commissioner of Commerce and Economic Development for Alaska, Former Mayor of Dutch Harbor and is currently promoting geothermal and related hydrogen industries in the Aleutian Islands.

Five years, no verdict: Judge swap adds twist in Gabrielle LeDoux voter fraud case

The long-running criminal case against former Alaska State Rep. Gabrielle LeDoux has taken another unexpected turn with the reassignment of the trial judge, nearly five years after charges were first filed.

Judge Kevin Saxby, who oversaw the first trial that ended in a hung jury, has now been replaced by Judge Josie Garton, a liberal judge in the Anchorage Superior Court.

LeDoux, now 76, is facing a retrial on 12 charges related to alleged voter misconduct during the 2018 elections.

ormer Alaska Rep. Gabrielle LeDoux’s long-delayed election misconduct trial started in Anchorage in Nov. 18 and lasted seven days. The closing arguments were held Nov. 27, and the jury has had the long Thanksgiving weekend to deliberate. As of this writing, the date has yet been published for when the jury will be asked for its verdict in an election fraud case that was brought by the State of Alaska in 2020 and which has been delayed several times, but it is expected to be early this week.

LeDoux was accused by state prosecutors in 2020 of encouraging people who did not live in her district to vote for her in the 2018 primary and general elections. 

The case continued in 2021, when an Anchorage grand jury, after hearing the evidence, indicted LeDoux, Lisa (Vaught) Simpson, and Caden Vaught on multiple counts of voter misconduct in the first degree, charges stemming from an investigation that started in 2018 after the Division of Elections identified irregularities in absentee ballot applications and absentee ballots returned for the primary election. The Alaska State Troopers, in conjunction with the Federal Bureau of Investigations, were involved in the two-year investigation.

These charges include five felony counts and seven misdemeanors, including accusations that she and her associates orchestrated improper voting activities in House District 15, which is an area of North Anchorage that is now mostly in District 19 after 2020’s redistricting.

The Alaska Department of Law decided to retry the case after the first trial ended in a mistrial on Dec. 2, 2024, when Anchorage jurors failed to reach a unanimous verdict on any one of the charges.

The case has been marked by repeated delays and complications since it began in 2020. At the heart of the allegations are claims that LeDoux and her campaign team, which included her former chief of staff Lisa Simpson manipulated voter registrations and encouraged ineligible votes during the 2018 primary and general elections.

A trial-setting conference was scheduled for Feb. 3, and there have been numerous trial-setting hearings, but a new trial date has yet to be set.

LeDoux’s defense attorney Kevin Fitzgerald is trying to convince prosecutors to drop the case entirely, arguing that it has dragged on too long and lacks merit.

However, state prosecutors are reportedly moving forward with preparations for a second trial and are addressing ongoing disputes over expert testimony.

The reassignment of the case to Judge Garton may shift the legal dynamics. Garton is known for her progressive rulings, including a recent decision allowing non-physicians to perform abortions in Alaska, a decision that stirred considerable debate.

Her involvement in the LeDoux case now gives the judicial system the appearance that it will not treat election integrity with the seriousness it deserves.

The irony is that a case centered on voter fraud has now stretched into its sixth year without resolution. Despite the severity of the original charges, which if proven could have served as a deterrent for future misconduct, the prolonged timeline may instead suggest the opposite.

For now, the case remains in limbo, with no date set and a new judge at the helm. It is yet another chapter in what has become Alaska’s most drawn-out political trial in its short history.

Fairbanks Daily News-Miner under scrutiny after ‘cake for a shooting’ threat by opinion writer

A Fairbanks News-Miner opinion columnist is facing scrutiny and potential legal consequences after publishing a vitriolic social media post calling for the death of a conservative activist in Interior Alaska.

In her column in the Fairbanks Daily News-Miner targeting Borough Assembly member Barbara Haney, Rebekah McNabb, a featured opinion writer at the News-Miner, penned a column accusing Barbara Haney of being a promoter of fascism and associating her with extremist ideologies. She called for a protest at a Fairbanks Chamber of Commerce event on Tuesday, which prompted extra security to be stationed at the door of the Westmark Conference Center. In addition to the governor’s own usual security team, there were State Troopers posted at the door.

The column, which lacks substantive evidence and singles out the local elected official and sitting governor for personal vilification and claims of “fascism,” has raised questions about the judgment of the newspaper that serves Interior Alaska.

The controversy escalated sharply after it was revealed that McNabb, posting under the name “Rivka Dean” on social media, wrote a disturbing message a week ago referencing another conservative activist in Fairbanks, saying, “she’s gonna get herself shot one of these days lol I’ll have a cake when it happens.”

The post is an incitement and endorsement of violence. The woman’s social media account has since been suspended by Facebook due to going against “community standards.”

McNabb’s column had framed the planned protest as resistance to what she described as a “creeping fascism” in local politics, a claim not only inflammatory but possibly dangerous in light of her subsequent online threat. About 25-30 people showed up at her protest on Tuesday.

While opinion writing is protected by the First Amendment, statements that defame a public official and those that threaten violence may not be.

If the victim of the social media post were to pursue legal action, McNabb could be exposed to civil liability for calling for the death of someone, with the insinuation of a reward.

Activist Kelly Nash, the subject of the violent social media post, has called for a criminal investigation.

Ranked-choice voting on the table in Juneau: Reform or risk?

The Juneau Assembly is moving toward adopting ranked-choice voting for future local elections. On June 2, the Assembly unanimously voted in favor of an ordinance proposed by Assembly member Ella Adkison to implement RCV beginning in 2026. The measure will first get a public hearing and final vote scheduled in late July.

Adkison says, without evidence, that the RCV system encourages consensus-building and allows for more nuanced voter expression. The Legislature demonstrates this is false — political observers say they’ve never seen so much dysfunction as this year’s RCV crop of lawmakers. Adkison is a legislative staff member for Juneau state Sen. Jesse Kiehl, raising issues of ethics, access to voter information that citizens don’t have access to, and competing loyalties.

Juneau voters have shown support for ranked-choice voting in the past. When in 2024 a statewide referendum to repeal ranked-choice voting was on the ballot, 61% of voters in Juneau’s District 3 and 74.3% in District 4 voted against repeal. Statewide, the repeal lost by just 664 votes.

If adopted in Juneau, the capital would be the first city in Alaska to use ranked-choice voting in local races, although it would not be ready for this October’s municipal election.

Some of the most cited problems with ranked-choice voting are complexity and delay of results. Unlike traditional elections where voters select a single candidate, RCV requires voters to rank multiple candidates in order of preference. This creates confusion and may discourage participation, particularly among older voters or those less familiar with the process. In many races since it was implemented statewide, it has appeared to suppress both voter and candidate participation.

Unlike traditional elections where winners are typically known on election night, RCV elections often require several days of tabulation and multiple rounds of vote reallocation before a winner is declared. This lag can erode public confidence in the process and open the door to mistrust in election outcomes.

In RCV, ballots that do not rank all candidates may be “exhausted” during the tabulation process, meaning a voter’s ballot no longer counts in the final rounds if all their ranked candidates have been eliminated. In close races, this can result in a candidate winning with fewer total votes than were cast in the first round, undermining the perception of a “majority victory.”

Implementing RCV is not cost-neutral. Municipalities must modify voting systems, retrain poll workers, and launch extensive public education campaigns to ensure voters understand how to fill out their ballots correctly. These upfront costs can be significant, particularly in smaller jurisdictions with limited resources.

Despite these concerns, the Juneau Assembly is planning a public outreach campaign ahead of the July decision. The campaign aims to gather community feedback and educate voters on how the system works. Assembly members have emphasized the importance of public participation in shaping the final decision.

Still, the debate over ranked-choice voting is far from settled in Alaska. While Juneau voters have leaned in favor of the system, another statewide repeal effort is under way in Alaska and other states are now banning the novel and insecure method that is being rapidly adopted by liberal jurisdictions.

Priorities: Juneau Assembly approves $1 million for ‘civic center’ planning expenditures, while flood concerns remain in the valley

The Juneau Assembly has approved a formal agreement to begin design work on a new $60 million Capital Civic Center, to be built on the site of the current Juneau Arts & Culture Center — an aging National Guard Armory building.

Last month, the Assembly passed Resolution 4007, authorizing a memorandum of agreement with The Partnership, Inc., the nonprofit leading the fundraising effort for the arts and performance facility. This agreement launches the design phase of the project, which has been rebranded from its previous designation as an “arts” center. The city has pledged up to $1 million in public funds toward a $5 million budget, just for the construction plans.

The decision comes less than a year after catastrophic flooding caused by a glacial dam outburst from Suicide Basin destroyed homes and infrastructure in the Mendenhall Valley. Scientists warn that such flooding may become more frequent due to continued glacial melting. Still, the Assembly is moving forward with a project that voters have historically not prioritized. In response, city leaders rebranded the project as a “civic center” in an attempt to make it more appealing to taxpayers, who will ultimately bear the cost of construction and operations.

The arts center project has long been championed by local arts advocates and big-government supporters, including Bruce Botelho, a former mayor who in many ways acts as a shadow mayor in Juneau. The advocates view the venue as a cultural anchor and a potential tourism draw for downtown Juneau.

The newly approved spending documents outline the roles and responsibilities of both the city and The Partnership. Under the agreement, The Partnership must provide updated operational business plans, a life cycle cost analysis, and conduct value engineering reviews to inform Assembly decisions as the project progresses.

The Partnership, Inc. (EIN 46-4451460), is a nonprofit made up of local activists in arts, business, and tourism. It has secured some of the funding for the design phase from private donors. Juneau musician Bob Banghart serves as executive director and point person for the Capital Civic Center, coordinating efforts with groups such as the Juneau Arts & Humanities Council, Travel Juneau, and the Juneau Chamber of Commerce. Local firm NorthWind Architects has been selected to lead the design work.

While planning for the arts-civic center is now accelerating, some Mendenhall Valley residents are still waiting to see whether mitigation efforts along the Mendenhall River will protect their homes and businesses from this year’s flood season. The flooding disasters of 2023 and 2024 displaced families, damaged property, and overwhelmed drainage systems. In response, large Hesco barriers are being installed along vulnerable sections of the riverbank. But whether they will work this year is still a big unknown.

Despite the ongoing threat posed by the glacier-fed Suicide Basin during the warmer months, city leaders have chosen to prioritize arts and culture spending. For now, the rebranded civic center project moves forward, with schematic design work expected to continue through 2025. Residents can follow project updates at NorthWind Architects’ downtown office, located at 125 Seward Street.

Sean Boily of NorthWind Architects defended the project that his company will benefit greatly from. On Facebook, he wrote, “yah we need more hotel and housing and providing support for homes built (without foresight) in a flood area. We need to do this concurrently … stop trying to block city commitments to development of that type down town – that’s where visitors and seasonal employees want to be.”

His complete post in response to a Juneau doubter was:

“This will be a City owned asset at the end of the day, and largely NOT paid for by you. The arts council has proven it can operate the Centennial Hall facility more efficiently than the CBJ ever could, so we have a good operator that will keep operations out of the red. The Partnership is a nonprofit development arm of the arts council and community supporters for this project. In the last decade they have pulled together more than half of the funding for this facility, which is on track to be THE LARGEST philanthropically funded project with the least government support in Alaska. CBJs $1m plus access to the property to do it is pretty tiny investment in expanding capacity of Centennial Hall. This does have support from our visitor industry – they use the current facility, see it aging out, and see benefit in expansion. We also have new neighbors to accommodate: the future expanded USCG base next door. We are providing infrastructure capacity with this facility. 2) yah we need more hotel and housing and providing support for homes built (without foresight) in a flood area. We need to do this concurrently. It ALL gives people a reason to live here. And in part because of this vision there are developers starting to look more seriously at Juneau in the hotel/housing world. Read some assembly packets, attend some meetings, stop trying to block city commitments to development of that type down town – that’s where visitors and seasonal employees want to be. 3) I see people keep misconstruing costs of “design”, clearly having no clue what that means. That is all planning, engineering (mechanical, electrical, structural, civil, environmental, energy, fire protection) plus acoustical, lighting, architectural, parking, landscape, theater, estimating etc. – three years of design and construction administration services, that’s mostly by a few dozen LOCAL professionals who also pay taxes here. Then on top of that will be scores of people in the construction trades to build. This, compounded with other projects on the boards, makes an economically strong community for a long time to come.

“We should have gotten this done a decade ago when it would have cost half as much. Too much resistance to support then, this has negatory affected the perception of outside developers considering investment here now,” he continued. “Are you all just banking on a state or federal handout to enhance our town assets? Not likely to happen without some local commitment like this.”

Mendenhall River flood, 2024

There is no transparency at this point on the cost to taxpayers for building or maintaining the palace to the arts.

Meanwhile, a citizens’ group monitoring and advising on the flood risks in the Mendenhall Valley will have its next meeting at 6 pm, June 18 at Chapel by the Lake, next to Auke Lake. Attending will be Congressman Nick Begich III’s state director Rick Whitbeck.

Anchorage Assembly members propose ordinance to penalize unauthorized squatters on public property

Three members of the Anchorage Assembly will on Tuesday introduce a new ordinance that would reinstate criminal penalties for unauthorized camping on public property. The effort is meant to address the lawless criminal encampments that have overtaken much of the city.

The proposal, sponsored by Assembly Members Keith McCormick (South Anchorage, Girdwood), Scott Myers, and Jared Goecker (both representing Chugiak, Eagle River, and Birchwood), would amend sections of the Anchorage Municipal Code to classify unlawful camping on public premises as a class B misdemeanor. The ordinance also includes enforcement protocols that aim to comply with recent court rulings, including the US Supreme Court’s decision in City of Grants Pass v. Johnson, which gives localities the authority to police and abate these encampments.

In 2024, the Assembly debated two previous ordinances that attempted to reintroduce criminal penalties for squatting on public land. One of those ordinances, AO 2024-26, had its criminal provisions stripped before the final version (AO 2024-26(S)) was adopted. Another proposal, AO 2024-39, which retained those penalties, was postponed indefinitely despite strong public testimony in favor of enforcement options beyond simple abatement.

Since then, the municipality has had to rely solely on abatement measures outlined in Title 15 of the code to address illegal encampments, a process that has proven slow and ineffective at reducing the spread of camps in children’s parks, trails, greenbelts, along waterways, and in parking lots and other public spaces.

The ordinance directly addresses the gaps left behind by previous legislative efforts and provides law enforcement with a tool, used successfully in other cities like Tacoma, to help restore public safety and the shared use of our public spaces.

Davis Park in the Mountain View neighborhood has been a frequent site for dozens of encampments that can grow elaborate into multi-story structures. Chester Creek, Ship Creek, Campbell Creek greenbelts, Third and Ingra, and Spenard are also locations of notable encampments, some that feature things like like stolen outhouses and generators.

Modeled after Tacoma’s 2022 “Use of Public Property” ordinance, the Anchorage proposal would apply to individuals who knowingly camp or store personal belongings on public land, and violations would be charged as misdemeanors. The ordinance also includes provisions designed to align with a legal framework established by federal courts, which have emphasized that cities must ensure adequate shelter options before enforcing anti-camping laws.

A year ago, the Assembly’s homelessness chairman Felix Rivera said no such ordinance would ever pass.

“It is important to note that the ruling addresses the criminalization and prosecution of people sleeping in public space. It has never been the practice or policy of the Municipality to actively prosecute people experiencing homelessness for the simple act of camping in public,” Rivera said at the time. “Most recently, this April, the Assembly indefinitely postponed AO 2024-39, an ordinance proposed by the Bronson Administration which would have amended Title 8 to criminally penalize public camping.”

Rivera said “Today, the Municipality has all the tools we need to humanely address life, health, and safety in our community. Abatement is only one of the many tools and the Assembly approved AO 2024-55(S), As Amended, revising the regulations that prioritize abatement just last month.”

Rivera’s opposition to the ordinance last year may indicate that this year’s effort will also fail to pass the Assembly and that the vagrant camps will simply be moved around through periodic abatement efforts.

Although the ordinance will be introduced at Tuesday’s regular meeting, public comment will not be taken until June 24, at the earliest, before the measure can proceed to a vote from the entire 12-member Assembly.

The meeting is in the Assembly Chambers at the Loussac Library, 3600 Denali, Room 108. starting at around 5 pm. The complete agenda is at this link.

Live Streaming and Archived meetings/Podcasts at http://www.muni.org/watchnow

Live Streaming available on Youtube at https://www.youtube.com/@moameetings 

Anchorage Assembly may sue State of Alaska for not treating mentally ill, homeless Alaskans

The Anchorage Assembly will consider a resolution to be introduced during Tuesday’s meeting by Assemblyman George Martinez that would have the city attorney explore the possibility of suing the State of Alaska over its handling of homelessness and behavioral health services.

The resolution highlights a public health and safety crisis in Anchorage, which Martinez blames on the State’s failure to provide adequate behavioral health services, as required by Article VII, Section 4 of the Alaska Constitution. Martinez, formerly with Occupy Wall Street and other leftist activities in New York City, asserts that the State has not maintained an effective behavioral health system, particularly in rural areas, resulting in widespread deficiencies in mental health and substance use treatment.

Anchorage has become a hub for behavioral health crisis response, his resolution says. The city bears a disproportionate burden managing issues such as homelessness and untreated mental illness that stem from statewide service gaps. Rural communities send their misfits to Anchorage, where they line the streets, doorways, and green belts, as they cope with their mental health, criminal habits, and illegal drug issues.

The Martinez resolution outlines some of the economic and social impacts on Anchorage, including strain on public safety resources, increased costs for businesses, reduced tourism and hospitality revenue, and challenges in workforce recruitment. He also notes that Anchorage spends between $6 million and $10 million annually on emergency shelters, encampment abatement, and related services.

Behavioral health concerns account for about 20% of police activity, more than 15,000 EMS calls annually, and over 400 monthly Mobile Crisis Team calls, services that lack consistent state funding, the resolution says.

The resolution formally calls it a crisis and a sustained public health and safety issue caused by State of Alaska failures, and says Anchorage shoulders an unfair share of related costs and burdens. It directs the Municipal Attorney to explore legal remedies against the State, including tort claims, reimbursement for unfunded mandates, public nuisance actions, and claims of constitutional violations. The Municipal Attorney would be required to report findings and legal strategies within 90 days.

Additionally, the resolution encourages collaboration with other municipalities, Tribal governments, and stakeholders to advocate for statewide accountability.

If passed, the resolution will take effect immediately, triggering a potential legal challenge against the State to hold it accountable for its constitutional obligations and to address the city’s disproportionate burden related to homelessness and mental illness.

Martinez and other Marxist members of the Anchorage Assembly sabotaged former Mayor Dave Bronson’s proposed navigation center, where people who were having life crisis issues could get the specific help they needed, whether it was temporary housing, drug rehabilitation, or mental health services. The Assembly, which has been taken over by Democrats and socialists, is now the “dog that caught the car,” but is planning to push the responsibility to the Dunleavy Administration.

Resolution No. AR 2025-191 directs the Municipal Attorney to explore all legal remedies against the State of Alaska and other entities it holds responsible for the Anchorage homelessness and mental health crisis.

Additionally, Resolution No. AR 2025-192 urges the Anchorage Administration and Health Department to create a targeted strategy to support unsheltered individuals with untreated serious mental illness or behavioral health conditions. It emphasizes collaboration with partners to develop health-based interventions and establish stabilization facilities, aiming to provide compassionate, health-focused solutions rather than relying solely on law enforcement or emergency services.

The meeting is in the Assembly Chambers at the Loussac Library, 3600 Denali, Room 108. starting at around 5 pm.

Live Streaming and Archived meetings/Podcasts at http://www.muni.org/watchnow

Live Streaming available on Youtube at https://www.youtube.com/@moameetings