Thursday, July 24, 2025
Home Blog Page 69

Win Gruening: Should food be taxed in Juneau?

By WIN GRUENING

Why have Juneau city leaders supported an extensive list of municipal sales tax exemptions over the years, but are unable to seriously consider exempting basic necessities like food or utilities?

While seniors in Juneau do benefit from such an exemption, the majority of citizens do not.

The Affordable Juneau Coalition recently filed and will be collecting signatures on two ballot initiatives and a charter amendment designed to make Juneau more affordable. One of those initiatives would exempt food and utilities from CBJ sales tax.

Taxing basic necessities like food and utilities disproportionately penalizes lower-income households as these taxes represent a larger percentage of disposable income. Not taxing these basic necessities is seen as a way to make the tax system less regressive and to provide relief to young families and low-income individuals. It is an effective way for policymakers to help constituents, especially during times of high inflation or economic stress. Most states and a majority of counties in the U. S. already exempt groceries from sales tax, reflecting broad public support for the idea.

Of the 45 states with a sales tax, 33 states and the District of Columbia exempt groceries. Only 12 states still charge sales tax on food items. Washington State, our nearest neighbor, doesn’t tax food at the state or local level and, like Alaska, has no income tax. 

Of course, the reduction in tax revenue must be offset by other revenue adjustments or a reduction in expenditures. Municipal entities that have implemented food tax exemptions have employed a combination of both.

Which brings me back to the question: Why does the City and Borough of Juneau (CBJ) exempt taxes from purchasers who expect to pay sales tax and are financially capable of doing so?

There are 35 different municipal sales tax exemptions currently in place and, if some were repealed, it would increase tax revenues – with minimal impact on most residents.

These include but are not limited to, exemptions for lobbyists, medical doctors, optometrists, acupuncturists, counselors, therapists, funeral directors, and travel agents. CBJ also exempts membership dues to labor unions and fraternal organizations, long-term residential rentals, bank fees, leasing commissions, and sales to and from certain non-profit organizations and federally recognized Indian tribes (except for pull-tabs).

Some exemptions are not significant enough to warrant much consideration and some may be worthy, but one of the most striking is the one exempting sales to or from certain non-profit entities or Indian tribes. On its face, this exemption doesn’t make sense. Only a handful of states provide broad exemptions for sales by nonprofits. In Washington State, for example, nonprofits are required to collect and remit retail sales tax on their sales of goods and services. 

One could argue that exempting certain non-profits from paying sales on their purchases helps them and, thereby, benefits society generally. No such argument can be made to justify exempting retail purchases by Juneau residents and visitors when they buy goods or services from non-profit retail businesses or tribal entities. 

Indeed, some exempt organizations operate businesses in Juneau that sell products that often compete directly with private sector businesses that have no such advantage. 

Sealaska Heritage, Discovery Southeast Glacier Gift Shop, Juneau Arts and Humanities Council, and DIPAC are examples of non-profit sellers that don’t collect sales taxes on retail sales such as art, books, jewelry, souvenirs, tours, and other tourism related activities. Tlingit-Haida Central Council, a federally recognized tribal entity, operates two cafes and a motel in Juneau and is not required to collect sales tax from customers. (They do collect hotel tax).

When cruise ship visitors spend money in these venues, why not collect CBJ sales tax? It’s the cruise ship passengers, not the non-profit, paying the 5% tax.

It shouldn’t matter who operates the retail store, or which business a customer chooses to patronize. All businesses should be collecting and remitting the 5% sales tax when selling goods and services to the public. CBJ can then use this previously uncollected 5% to help compensate for removing tax on groceries and utilities.

Citizens will have an opportunity this month to sign a petition to place a food and utility tax exemption on the ballot. 

From a budgetary standpoint, exchanging unwarranted tax exemptions for socially desirable ones is a fiscally prudent policy as well as a fairer one.

After retiring as the senior vice president in charge of business banking for Key Bank in Alaska, Win Gruening became a regular opinion page columnist for the Juneau Empire. He was born and raised in Juneau and graduated from the U.S. Air Force Academy in 1970. He is involved in various local and statewide organizations.

Greg Sarber: District 6 Republicans take bold steps to sanction Sen. Gary Stevens, Lisa Murkowski

By GREG SARBER | SEWARD’S FOLLY

During the last two sessions of the legislature, the Alaska Republican Party has been unable to prevent RINO party members from joining with the Democrats to form governing caucuses.  The Republican Party’s inability to prevent this has been well documented, but things might be changing thanks to actions at the grassroots level.  

Recent articles on my Sewards Folly Substack have shown how other states have held miscreants accountable in similar circumstances, but there has been nothing but crickets from the leadership of the AK GOP.

Where the state leadership has failed, grassroots party members have stepped up to take the lead on this issue.  In a meeting earlier this month, members of the GOP’s District 6, located on the southern Kenai Peninsula, voted to censure both state Sen. Gary Stevens (R-Kodiak) and Sen. Lisa Murkowski (R-Alaska).  While censure resolutions have been made in the past and accomplished absolutely nothing, things may be different this time.

I recently met with representatives from GOP leadership in District 6, who filled me in on the details of what they are attempting, and it sounds like something meaningful could finally get accomplished.

The first step in holding the Gang of Seven accountable is a change adopted to the Alaska Republican Party Rules in July of 2024.  Article VII was added, and it includes language which says: “Any candidate or elected official may be sanctioned or suspended for any of the following reasons… (e) Forming a majority caucus in which non-Republicans are at least 1/3 or more of the coalition.”

Given this language, it is clear that each member of the Gang of Seven in Juneau has violated this part of the AK GOP bylaws.  Article VII also specifies potential punishment: “Sanctions may include censure, declaring elected officials or candidates ineligible for endorsement or support by the ARP or its affiliates, recruiting a challenger, and prohibiting participation in ARP events, or any other appropriate sanction not disallowed by ARP or RNC rules.”  

The significance of these rule changes is that censured Republicans could lose financial support from the party, be prevented from attending state GOP nominating conventions, or face a GOP-backed challenger in their next reelection campaign. These are real sanctions with real teeth to them.  

With the new rule changes now in effect, the District 6 leadership convened a meeting on April 5th and voted to censure both Sens. Stevens and Murkowski. Sen. Stevens has violated the new rules adopted in February, and Sen. Lisa Murkowski receives their ire because she has been subversive to President Trump’s policies and is frequently aligned with the Democrats back in Washington, D.C.

The one problem with this round of sanctions is that although District 6 voted to censure both RINOs, District 5 did not, which prevents the full impact of the sanctions from taking effect, at least for now.  

Alaska Senate districts are each composed of two House districts. Sen. Stevens represents District C, which is composed of House Districts 5 and 6. District 6, located in Homer, voted to censure the senator and begin the sanction process, but District 5, located in Kodiak, did not pass the same articles of censure, which is probably no surprise.  

RINO Sen. Gary Stevens lives in Kodiak.  The local party knows that having their senator hold the position of Senate President benefits them.  Since AK GOP rules require both House districts comprising a senate district to vote for censure, this might seem like another failed attempt by the Republicans to police their members.

However, today’s Republicans aren’t your daddy’s GOP anymore; they are made of sterner stuff and aren’t taking no for an answer.  There is a second part to the AK GOP’s February rules change, which also permits the sanction of a state senator if 19 of the 37 organized GOP House districts in Alaska also vote to censure the individual.  

District 6 members have contacted other districts around the state, asking them to vote to approve Sen. Gary Stevens’s censure. If 19 of the statewide districts approve the resolution, Sen. Stevens could face the punishments documented in Article VII, which could hurt his reelection chances next November.  More importantly, if the censure resolution can be passed against the sitting Senate President, then every other party defector today and in the future could face similar punishment.  If the AK GOP can punish Sen. Gary Stevens, it will be a “Come to Jesus” moment for the rest of the Gang of Seven.  

As a reminder to voters around the state, the Gang of Seven GOP political traitors includes House Representatives Louise Stutes (R-Kodiak) and Chuck Kopp (R-Anchorage) and Sens. Bert Stedman (R-Sitka), Gary Stevens (R-Kodiak), Jesse Bjorkman (R-Nikiski), Cathy Giessel (R-Anchorage), and Kelly Merrick (R-Eagle River).

Each of the organized House Districts around the state should vote to approve District 6’s censure resolution of Sen. Gary Stevens. Additionally, the House districts shown in Table 1 above should vote to censure their respective senators and representatives who have violated the AK GOP bylaws by joining governing caucuses with the Democrats.  

Sometimes getting things done politically in this state is like trying to turn a supertanker.  Those ships take a long time to turn, but given enough time and patience, it can be done.  It is time for the Republicans to get their ship headed in the right direction, and for the first time in a long time, it looks like that just might be possible.

Valley Republican Women’s Club issues stinging statement about HB 57 vote — and some lawmakers are not going to like it

The Valley Republican Women of Alaska minced no words on Thursday: “Primaries are coming.”

In writing about the Republicans who voted for and against the Democrats’ education funding bill that has passed the House and Senate, the VRWAK executive team was direct. They praised those who voted against House Bill 57, and gave those who supported it a dose of tough love.

Here’s what the women posted on their Facebook page early Thursday:

From the VRWAK Executive Team:

We want to start by thanking the legislators who stood their ground and voted NO on 57 today. Your courage to defend conservative principles and make the right choice for Alaskans did not go unnoticed.

But let’s be honest, the Valley Republican Women of Alaska are done playing nice with the career climbers and political chameleons who fold under pressure.

PICK A LANE: Are you fighting for conservative values, or just wearing red while selling out the base?

We don’t rally behind politicians slithering their way for approval from the middle…or worse, the left.

We campaign and work hard to raise funds for those who speak truth, stand firm, and FIGHT, FIGHT, FIGHT their way unapologetically to the Right.

And before the usual guilt trips roll in about “attacking our own,” let’s be clear: this is what accountability looks like.

True accountability doesn’t happen behind closed doors or whispered gently in your ear. It happens out loud, in public, with clarity and conviction. You are elected servants of the grassroots public. If we won’t hold our own to this standard, who will?

This is not about division, it’s about direction. We’re not here to babysit the status quo.

We’re here to take our state back.

Primaries are coming.

Only eight legislators in the House and three in the Senate voted against HB 57, which was the bill that became the Democrats’ funding mechanism for raising spending on schools. Originally, it was a bill only about cell phone use in schools, but it now appears that Rep. Zack Fields, the lead sponsor, always intended it to be the vehicle for a major increase to the Base Student Allocation. Fields is the former communication director for the Alaska Democratic Party and field coordinator for AFL-CIO.

The Republicans who voted with the Democrats appeared to be just “done with it,” worn out by the process and ready to move on, settling for what they thought was the best they could get, as the last day of session approaches.

But the Republican base around the state appears dissatisfied with the bill that spends $220 million or more per year on education, but with very little expected in return from school districts. Alaska ranks 6th in the United States for K-12 spending per pupil, with an expenditure of approximately $21,325 per student annually. Yet it is second from the bottom in terms of student competencies.

What’s more, Gov Mike Dunleavy, who has made education one of his top issues, has his own bill that adds annual spending for schools but has many policy improvements to help students and families, particularly those who want to start charter schools or who are studying via correspondence programs. The Democrats in charge of the House and Senate have not given Dunleavy’s bill a hearing in their highly partisan Game of Thrones.

Sponsors for the controversial HB 57, which may be vetoed by the governor, are all Democrats except for these Republicans: Sen. Rob Yundt, Sen. Mike Cronk. Sen. Bert Stedman, Sen. Jesse Bjorkman, Sen. Kelly Merrick, and Sen. Gary Stevens.

In the Senate, only Republican Sens. Mike Shower, Robert Myers, and Shelley Hughes voted against the Democrats’ bill.

In the House, the no votes were Reps. Jamie Allard, DeLena Johnson, Kevin McCabe, Mike Prax, George Rauscher, Rebecca Schwanke, Cathy Tilton, and Frank Tomaszewski, with David Nelson excused from the floor.

That means there were several legislators who voted for the bill and who have now raised the ire of Republican activists: Rep. Mia Costello, Julie Coulome, Bill Elam, Chuck Kopp, Elexie Moore, Justin Ruffridge, Dan Saddler, Will Stapp, Jubilee Underwood, and Sarah Vance.

Of those, Rep. Elexie Moore, Rep. Jubilee Underwood, and Sen. Rob Yundt — all first-term legislators — are in the Mat-Su Valley district and might lose the support of one of the major grassroots campaign groups in the region.

Here are our previous stories on the twisted path of HB 57, which now awaits the governor’s pen:

Glamming it up at West: Anchorage high school club helps students play bingo with drag queens

It’s the Wild, Wild West at West High School in Anchorage. Students from 14 to 18 years at West High have the opportunity to explore their sexual expression and possible fetishes during the lunch hour, as the Gender and Sexuality Alliance hosts “Drag Themed Bingo,” with food and drinks provided.

The GSA club was formed in 2001 by two English teachers “for students who may be questioning their sexuality, students who seek support from peers and adults, and students who know who they are and want to express themselves,” according to an account in the school’s newspaper in 2019.

In that report, club advisor and English teacher Barb Clark said, “At the time [2001], having a GSA club was still kind of cutting edge…it had a bad reputation, and was quite controversial. There was still some agitation, not from inside, but more on the outside on whether this was appropriate. But the club pushed through and now thrives with varying numbers of students attending meetings each week.”

Now, in 2025, the club is pushing the envelope further with drag queen activities for students, far out of the orbit of their parents. This is a twist on Drag Queen Story Hour, but instead of young children, this is for teens who want to experiment. Parents in the West High School community have not been informed about this activity on campus during school hours and have no reasonable means of keeping their 14-year-olds out of the gender-bending event.

According to the Wink Bingo website, drag bingo is a twist on traditional bingo where a drag queen hosts the game, blending the classic number-calling format with drag performances, comedy, and bawdy audience interaction. It often features risqué humor, lip-syncing, dancing, and glamorous costumes, creating a festive, “inclusive atmosphere.”

The event originated in Seattle in the 1990s, it has grown into a game that is popular in gay bars, nightclubs clubs, and even Players mark bingo cards as numbers are called, but the real draw is the drag queen’s charisma, banter, and ability to engage with the room.

“Drag queen bingo has been an unequivocal success in helping to popularise both of its facets: bingo and drag queen entertainment,” the website states.

According to the GSA club’s official profile on the school’s website, GSA is for “Promoting understanding and dispelling prejudice amongst gay, straight, transgender and bisexual students at West.”

And now it has an additional draw — normalizing transvestism as a form of appropriate entertainment for teens who are just beginning to explore sexuality, and holding that entertainment during school hours.

Senate and House resolve one unconstitutional aspect of education funding bill, leave another

House Bill 57 has passed — again. In the end, most Republicans in the House and Senate backed a spending bill sponsored by Rep. Zack Fields, one of the most hardline Democrats in the Legislature and the former communication director for the Alaska Democratic Party and former labor organizer for the AFL-CIO.

HB 57, which has seen twist and turns, took a few more turns on Wednesday, as the Senate fix one section of the bill that was unconstitutional.

HB 57, which began as a “cell phones in schools” bill but which is now an education funding bill, contained a provision from Sen. Rob Yundt of Wasilla that tied reading grants to the passage of another bill, a tax bill that he had voted for earlier in the session.

His amendment said the reading grant would be paid for from the tax, should it pass the House. That created a designated fund, which is unconstitutional. This called for a do-over in the Senate on Wednesday.

One of the major features of the bill is a $700 per student increase to the Base Student Allocation, which is the funding formula the state uses to appropriate funds to the school districts. Yundt’s amendment is in addition to that $184 million addition to the state budget.

Three Republican senators voted against the bill after it was sent back for constitutional fixes and then reappeared on the floor. They were Sen. Robb Myers, Sen. Mike Shower and Sen. Shelley Hughes.

The three had different reasons for objecting to the bill, but one of the main reasons was that Sen. Rob Yundt’s amendment, crafted in cooperation with Democrats, had some other technical issues with which they were not aligned.

Another part of the bill that could be considered unconstitutional is the amendment that has the state Department of Labor and Workforce Development tracking Alaska high school graduates for 20 years after they leave school, and compiling information on their lives.

Research to determine if any other state has such extensive tracking of high school graduates came up with none — Alaska will be alone in monitoring the activities of its graduates. It may violate the state Constitution’s privacy provision.

When the bill was returned to the House for concurrence on Wednesday, the body quickly agreed to the massive changes that had been made by the Senate, with only eight members voting against the bill.

The votes in the House and Senate means that most Republicans in the Legislature voted for a bill that was sponsored by a member who has worked hard to get them unelected, giving him a huge political win, when they could have demanded that the governor’s bill, which increased Base Student Allocation and had more policy aspects in it, be given a fair hearing.

The governor’s bill, HB 204, has yet to be heard in committees, as both the House and Senate are dominated by Democrats and is moot, ow that HB 57 has passed.

It’s unclear if the governor will veto the bill. If so, it would take 40 out of the 60 votes in the Legislature to override his veto. This will put the Republicans who voted for the legislation in a spot — do they stick with the hardline Democrats or do they support the highest-ranking elected Republican in the state?

Breaking: Dunleavy has private meeting with Trump

Alaska Gov. Mike Dunleavy, who traveled to Washington, DC this week with a few dozen business leaders in Alaska, got a private meeting on Tuesday with President Donald Trump.

Although details of that meeting have not been revealed, it was likely concerning the Alaska LNG Project, which Dunleavy has been working on for many months, along with the Alaska Gasline Development Corporation and the Alaska Industrial Export and Development Authority.

The gasline is also one of President Trump’s major priorities, articulated by him on the first day of his presidency when he signed an executive order to unleash Alaska’s energy potential.

Dunleavy and several Alaska business leaders, such as Alaska Oil and Gas Association Executive Director Kara Moriarty, also met with Interior Secretary Doug Burgum while in the nation’s capital.

The next steps on the gasline might be an announcement in coming weeks related to front end engineering and design (FEED) and partners for Phase 1, which would prioritize getting gas to Alaskans, apart from the export facilities.

The Legislature is also a factor. House Minority Leader Rep. Mia Costello has a resolution in support of the project, a resolution that would give investors some comfort that the Legislature supports the project. As the Legislature is in the home stretch for the FY 26 budget, decisions about the AGDC budget may send a critical message to oil and gas investors.

Welcome to downtown Anchorage: A pictorial tour of how Mayor LaFrance is managing the visitor season

As the saying goes, nothing good happens after midnight. It applies to downtown Anchorage, where the city blocks continue to be congested with sleeping or inebriated people often found right at the doors of businesses.

Visitors venturing downtown at night are likely to encounter this scene all summer, as Mayor Suzanne LaFrance finishes her first year in office. She ran on “competence,” accusing the former mayor of lacking the competence to run the city, after having led the opposition against his plans for a navigation center for those without shelter.

Earlier this month, Must Read Alaska gave readers a tour of some of the elaborate shelters being built in the greenbelts of Anchorage, where the city’s trails are no longer safe for citizens to use. Some of the structures have become multi-story sprawling shantytowns such as you might see in a third-world country. That pictorial tour can be seen here:

Downtown Anchorage is where the vagrants without the ambition to set up shantytowns have made their stand, so to speak. The city workers are found most mornings hosing off the sidewalks in front of buildings such as City Hall and the Alaska Performing Arts Center, where human excrement is evident, sometimes smeared across buildings.

Here’s a gallery of what we found late Tuesday night and early Wednesday morning in downtown Anchorage:

Mayor LaFrance has not been engaged in solving the downtown vagrancy problem, but she has been busy.

Last week, LaFrance announced the winners of her city snowplow naming competition. The winning names of the snowplows are: The Berminator, Taylor Drift, Blizzard Wizard, Luke Sidewalker, and Bladey Gaga.

“Now – just in time for the plow equipment’s spring hibernation – the ‘win’-ters have been selected and names have been assigned,” her press team merrily wrote on her behalf. “For the Municipality’s graders, Berminator froze out the competition, coming in first place. Bladey Gaga clinched second, and The Big Leplowski and Plowasaurus Rex tied for third. Other winning names for graders include Ctrl Salt Delete, Darth Grader, Knik of Time, Plowabunga, Betty White-Out, Blizzard Buster, Austin Plowers and Arctic Blade. 

“Taylor Drift was the top name for the city’s sidewalk clearers. Blizzard Wizard and Luke Sidewalker tied for second place, while Flurrious George and Sweeping Beauty came in third. Other winning names include Clearopathra, Pathfinder, Drift Destroyer, Drift Lifter, Edgar Allan Snow, Nunhdecheni (“One that eats snow”) and Snow Big Deal.”

In March, the mayor announced $5 million in federal funds that would be distributed directly to people in the form of housing assistance grants, and in April, she announced that she will create 10,000 more homes in Anchorage in 10 years.

Murkowski urges Alaskans to protest Trump

72

Just before the May Day protests schedule for Thursday, Alaska Sen. Lisa Murkowski took to the statewide airwaves to encourage Alaskans to protest President Donald Trump.

On Alaska Public Radio’s “Talk of Alaska,” she praised the 50501 group that has been organizing regular resistance activities against Trump since Inauguration Day, Jan. 20. The group has been active in all 50 states, including Alaska.

Murkowski spent an hour on the show, with much of her time focused on criticizing the Trump Administration. She was speaking to her base of Democrats, but over 54.5% of Alaska voters cast their ballots for Trump, so she was speaking to the resistance. Murkowski found not one good thing to say about the president.

May Day protests will take place on May 1. It’s the socialist holiday that is being repurposed into another “never Trump” day for Democrats. Big protests are expected across Alaska and the nation.

“I think that type of engagement is important and people shouldn’t feel discouraged because, ‘well, I haven’t seen anything change since the last week that I went to go protest.’ Keep the engagement up,” she told the listening audience.

Earlier this month, she told nonprofit leaders in Anchorage that “We are all afraid,” of President Trump and even she fears speaking out against him.

Murkowski is increasing her profile as the leader of the opposition to Trump, along with Sen. Bernie Sanders. She has a memoir coming out in June about her life as a politician, and all publicity is good publicity for sales as she nears her book launch.

Bob Griffin: The twisted path of education legislation and a compromise that annoys everyone

By BOB GRIFFIN

I’ve been following the twisting path of education legislation this year in Juneau. Education seems to dominate the conversation every year, as lawmakers fervently search for a compromise that manages to annoy both sides equally. This year is no different.

House Bill 57, recently passed by the Senate, now appears to be the leading “education bill” of this legislative session and a textbook example of the “annoy everyone” approach.

Democrats are unhappy because their original demand was for a 30% increase in formula funding with no strings attached.

Republicans are equally displeased. Their initial position called for little to no increase in formula funding, preferring instead targeted investments in reforms proven to yield results in other states.

The compromise? HB 57 delivers a modest 12% increase in formula funding but is light on meaningful reform. In other words, everyone’s unhappy.

We have a divided government. Democrats narrowly control both the Senate and the House. The Republicans’ only real leverage is the Governor’s veto pen — an extremely powerful tool given the slim majorities in both chambers.

While the veto can help Republicans win some battles, overusing it carries long-term strategic risks.

Unfortunately, the nuances of the Republican position are difficult to explain in the kind of bumper-sticker sound bites that seem to resonate most with low-information swing voters — the very people who will determine the future makeup of our state government.

Republicans face a tougher messaging challenge. They must counter the simplistic and widespread belief that more money automatically equals better outcomes in education.

I’ve tried to make it clear over the years that there is no consistent correlation between increased K–12 spending and improved student performance. Sadly, most voters aren’t as well-informed as the regular readers of this column.

I, too, am disappointed in HB 57, although it isn’t entirely without merit. One positive: it incentivizes early reading by rewarding schools for students who are at grade level or showing improvement in reading through grade six.

However, the bill does little to address the core problem in Alaska’s education system: the lack of meaningful competition for the existing education monopoly.

At this point, time is likely running out to sway the outcome of this session from “good enough” to “could be better.”

Should the current agreement fall apart, it would empower the “burn it all down” faction that’s pushing for a “no agreement” end to the session. That outcome wouldn’t just harm our kids, it would also complicate Republican messaging in the next election, particularly with swing voters drawn to simplistic narratives.

The most successful education reform efforts in the country have come from states with strong Republican majorities. I’d love to see those reforms in Alaska. But to borrow a phrase from President Trump: Right now, “we don’t have the cards.”

If the few reforms we’ve managed to pass in recent years begin to show real results, perhaps we’ll be better positioned to build the majorities needed for major change.

Bob Griffin is on the board of Alaska Policy Forum and served on the Alaska Board of Education and Early Development.