Thursday, October 15, 2026
Home Blog Page 39

Fourth Icebreaker Announced for Homeporting in Alaska

0

Due to a coordinated effort by Alaska’s Congressional Delegation, the President, and the U.S. Coast Guard, four Arctic Security Cutters or icebreakers have been secured for homeporting in Alaska. The securement of the first three icebreakers for Alaska was announced April 16, this year. The addition of the fourth icebreaker was announced this morning, June 11th.

The existing icebreaker, the Storis, was commissioned in Juneau, August 10, 2025. The next two icebreakers will be homeported in Kodiak following construction and the fourth will be homeported in Seward.

Congress has secured funding for a total of 11 Arctic Security Cutters for America. The first two to be built will go to Kodiak. The icebreaker to be homeported in Seward will be the sixth or seventh icebreaker built.

“Seward is going to be the next great Coast Guard city,” stated Senator Dan Sullivan during a press conference.

Senator Lisa Murkowski commented: “The investment is long, long overdue… The U.S. was lagging woefully behind.” Murkowski emphasized the need for Alaskans to focus on homeporting preparations related to housing, schools, childcare, affordable energy, shoreside infrastructure, and roads. 

Senators Sullivan and Murkowski both highlighted the need to address the energy needs of new Coast Guard families brought by the homeporting. They also both encouraged Alaskan coastal communities to continue port projects that enable more icebreakers to be homeported in Alaska.

Sullivan stated, “The Coast Guard is really pushing for speed.” Murkowski expressed appreciation for the Coast Guard’s willingness to converse with each member of the Alaska Congressional Delegation and with community leaders regarding the homeporting decision.

U.S. Representative Nick Begich commented in a press release: “Alaska is America’s gateway to the Arctic, and for too long, our nation’s icebreakers have been stationed thousands of miles from the waters they are built to navigate. Homeporting these icebreakers in Seward and Kodiak puts them exactly where they belong, closest to the mission and ready to project American strength across the Arctic at a time when our adversaries are racing to expand their own presence.”

Through the 2025 Working Families Tax Cuts Act (WFTCA), the Alaska congressional delegation secured $4.3 billion for the procurement of two new Polar Security Cutters, with substantial progress toward a third, and $3.5 billion to procure three Arctic Security Cutters, the nation’s next-generation medium polar icebreakers. Additionally, they championed $816 million for more than ten new light and medium domestic icebreaking cutters. They also helped secure over $3 billion for shoreside infrastructure to support the homeporting of these assets, including the $300 million needed for the homeporting of the Storis in Juneau. These investments and announcements mark the most significant expansion of icebreaking capability in U.S. history.

Beyond icebreakers, the WFTCA included major investments across the Coast Guard’s fleet: $1 billion for approximately 10 Fast Response Cutters (FRC), $4.3 billion for approximately nine Offshore Patrol Cutters (OPC), $2.2 billion for approximately 40 MH-60 helicopters, and $1.1 billion for approximately six HC-130 aircraft.

“Let’s Build This Damn Line:” Laborers, Union Leaders, and AK LNG Project Leaders Gather to Sign Labor Memorandum

This morning, June 11, Glenfarne Alaska LNG and Alaska’s Building Trades signed a memorandum of understanding (MOU) regarding labor for the Alaska LNG gasline. According to Joey Merrick, President of the Alaska Petroleum Joint Crafts Council, the MOU ensures Alaskans will be prioritized for jobs created by the gasline project and that every Alaskan who wants to work on the project has an opportunity to do so.

Laborers, union leaders, and project leaders gathered at the Alaska Laborers Training School to announce the signing of the memorandum.

“Today is about opportunity. It is about Alaska workers. It is about Alaska’s future,” stated Merrick. He emphasized the 12,000 jobs that the project creates, which will be filled first by Alaskans with the remaining jobs filled by lower 48 laborers. Merrick commented: “This is what this agreement represents: partnership, accountability, and opportunity.”

Adam Prestidge, President of Glenfarne Alaska LNG, gave a brief speech, stating that Glenfarne is “thrilled by the fortitude and commitment” of Alaskan laborers and leaders. Prestidge said, “today gives a resounding yes” to the question of whether the gasline can be built.

“First and foremost, [the MOU] is about prioritizing Alaska workers,” stated Rex Canon, Co-President of 8 Star Alaska, a subsidiary of Glenfarne Alaska LNG. Canon emphasized that every Alaskan who wants to participate and is qualified will get a chance to work on the project. According to Canon, working with the labor unions will help ensure the project “gets done on time and on budget.”

President of the Fairbanks Building and Construction Trades Council, Lake Williams commented on the current lack of opportunities in the state: “We see outward migration. People are going elsewhere for opportunity. Our kids are leaving.” According to Williams, the LNG project is the answer. He calls for the Legislature to “put their differences aside and do what’s best for Alaska.”

“Let’s build this damn line,” concluded Williams. “It is now or never. Let’s get it done.”

Bronson Frye, President of the Building and Construction Trades Council of Southcentral Alaska highlighted the “once in a generation” opportunity that the project offers and the “simple principle” that the gasline should be built by Alaskans. “That principle matters,” said Frye. “When we build something worthwhile, we build it together.”

Must Read Alaska has requested a copy of the MOU and will share it with readers when it is received.

Fleeting Highs, Layered Heartaches: Sin’s Cause-and-Effect

0

From the opening pages of Genesis to the digital headlines of the twenty-first century, humanity’s story repeats a single unlearned lesson: separation from God is never the answer. This is not ancient myth or abstract theology. It is the lived experience of every soul. Novels, films, and nightly news echo the same tension: free creatures choosing autonomy over the Creator. The choice is never “one and done.” It is daily, hourly, moment-by-moment. Each person confronts the same three unrelenting enemies: the flesh, the world, and the devil. Beneath every glittering temptation lies a three-letter reality: sin. 

At the heart of every fall lies pride — the root of every sin — and concupiscence, the disordered inclination toward sin inherited from the Fall. St. Thomas Aquinas maps the interior mechanics with clinical precision in the Summa Theologica (I-II, qq. 77–78). Original sin wounds the soul: the intellect darkens, the will weakens, and the passions rebel. Temptation then follows an exact sequence: 1) suggestion, the external lure from the world or the devil; 2) delight, the lower appetites savoring the forbidden; and finally, 3) consent, when the person acts on ungodly desires. Each consent disorders the soul further, making the next surrender easier. This is not metaphor. It is the lived psychology of every human heart since Eden. 

The pattern opens in Paradise. Adam and Eve, offered intimate friendship with God, preferred the serpent’s whisper: “You will be like gods” (Gen 3:5). Pride turned the will from Creator to creature. Cain chose murder over repentance (Gen 4). Noah’s descendants at Babel sought to “make a name for themselves” rather than call upon the Lord (Gen 11:4). Moses descended Sinai to find Israel adoring a golden calf of their own making (Ex 32). Even David, “a man after God’s own heart,” saw Bathsheba, delighted in what the eye suggested, and consented to adultery and murder (2 Sam 11). The mechanism never changes: suggestion, delight, consent, separation. Contrary to every moral lesson history offers, humanity stubbornly insists on knowing better than God and turns from the very boundaries He set for those who desire peace and joy. 

Jesus enters history as the New Adam. In the wilderness He faced the identical triad: flesh (stones into bread), world (all kingdoms for one act of worship), devil (cast yourself down)— and He refused every suggestion (Mt 4). On the Cross He crushed sin at its root, restoring grace and the possibility of rightly ordered desire. Yet the Church He founded was not spared the trial. Early martyrs resisted imperial power, and heresies arose to twist the apostolic faith, only to be put down by faithful saints. By the sixteenth century the disorder erupted publicly. The Protestant Reformation, whatever its grievances, fractured visible unity. Private judgment replaced the Church’s authority; the darkened intellect and weakened will lost their stable guide. Suggestion found easier consent. 

The pattern accelerates. Enlightenment rationalism, industrial materialism, and the sexual revolution armed the world’s allure with technology and artificial contraception. The flesh promised pleasure without consequence; the devil reframed autonomy as liberation. Inside the Church, post-conciliar decades witnessed a subtle erosion: doctrines on the Real Presence, mortal sin, marital indissolubility, and the uniqueness of Christ were psychologized or reduced to “pastoral options.” The same interior sequence operated: suggestion that mercy means accommodation, delight in cultural approval, consent that dilutes truth to avoid conflict. 

Today the separation is measurable. Belief in Christ’s divinity, the Resurrection, and even the existence of hell has plummeted. Families fracture, nations enshrine what Scripture calls abomination, and millions of the baptized live as practical atheists. Screens stimulate the passions around the clock. The intellect calls evil good; the will chooses comfort; the passions clamor for instant gratification. 

Yet the soul knows one thing with crystalline certainty: objective Truth. When the soul aligned with God’s will encounters that Truth, it stands affirmed and experiences peace. But the soul not following God’s will, when confronted with His Truth, recoils like a serpent in the grass and strikes at the bearer. Augustine’s confession names this restlessness: “Our hearts are restless until they rest in You, Lord.” God created humanity male and female and declared it “very good” (Gen 1:27, 31). Jesus reaffirmed the divine architecture: “What therefore God has joined together, let not man separate” (Mt 19:6). St. John names the perennial triad: “the desires of the flesh, the desires of the eyes, and the pride of life” (1 Jn 2:16). Romans 1:24–27 warns that exchanging truth for a lie leads to dishonorable passions and a debased mind. 

The Church Fathers diagnosed the disorder with prophetic clarity. St. Irenaeus condemned those who serve their own lusts while puffed up with pride, rejecting the Creator’s order. St. John Climacus declared, “Pride is the cause of every passion.” Aquinas crowns the analysis: pride is the “queen of all vices,” an inordinate appetite for excellence that elevates self above God (II-II, q. 162), rooted in the same three fountains: concupiscence of the flesh, concupiscence of the eyes, and pride of life. Unchecked, they produce disorder on every level whether spiritual, psychological, relational, or societal. 

Contemporary culture rebrands these vices as identity. When confronted with God’s design for marriage and sexuality, the response is rarely sorrow leading to repentance— it is hostility: “How dare you!” Yet population studies quietly affirm the ancient wisdom. Individuals in disordered lifestyles show significantly higher rates of depression, anxiety, and substance abuse, while stable, lifelong heterosexual marriage correlates with lower psychological distress, greater life satisfaction, and resilience. These statistics do not prove theology; they illustrate its outworking. Disordered passion yields fragmentation, not flourishing. What begins as elation unravels into layered heartache. 

Jesus did not abolish the flesh, the world, or the devil. He conquered them. Through the sacraments He supplies actual grace that heals the wounds Aquinas diagnosed. The sequence that leads to sin can be reversed by vigilance, prayer, and confession. The witness of martyrs and saints proves it is possible. 

Humanity’s story, therefore, is not inevitable decline, but repeated divine invitation. From Eden to this present hour, God cries: “Return to me with all your heart” (Joel 2:12). The deposit of faith has never changed; only our willingness to live it has. The question for our generation is whether we will at last consent to the grace that alone can reorder the human heart. Until then, humanity will chase fleeting highs and layered heartaches— restless, until it rests solely in God. 

10 Republicans File Formal Complaint Against ARP District 25 Chair Steve Johnson

Ten Republicans have filed a formal complaint against Steve Johnson, Chair for the Alaska Republican Party District 25. Steve Johnson is the husband of the current Alaska House Minority Leader, Representative Delena Johnson.

The complaint lists six reasons why the signatories have filed the complaints: 1) false statement regarding knowledge of precinct leaders, 2) refusal to hear a motion to reconsider mishandled endorsements, 3) refusal to properly follow Roberts Rules of Order, 4) refusal to seat present precinct leaders who requested seating, 5) conflict of interest and obstruction of endorsement process, 6) pattern of gatekeeping and exclusionary conduct.

Signatories sent the complaint letter to ARP Chairwoman Carmela Warfield, asking for an “immediate independent investigation into the conduct” of District Chair Johnson and the “temporary suspension of chair duties pending completion of the investigation.” If the investigation substantiates the allegations, the signatories ask that Johnson be removed from his position as Chair and other remedial measures taken.

Must Read Alaska reached out to the principal signatory, Joshua Hanson, to inquire whether a response has been provided by Chair Warfield and whether that response could be shared with the public. Hanson replied that Warfield responded but requested that the information not be shared with third parties.

“At this point I think it is safe to say we are hopeful that the next steps are in motion and will be announced in the near future,” stated Hanson.

Read the full formal complaint below:

House Finance Moves Gasline Bill Out of Committee

Today, June 10, 2026, House Finance moved the Alaska LNG gasline bill (HB 381 version T, and as amended) out of committee with a vote 11-0.

During the hearing, Representative Jamie Allard stated that the bill is “good for every single child, man and woman across the state of Alaska. And I think this is pretty historic, so I really appreciate everybody coming together, whether we disagreed or not, moving this out and moving it forward.”

Governor Dunleavy commented on X following the vote: “This legislation provides the certainty and stability needed to move the Alaska LNG Project forward, strengthen our economy, create thousands of good-paying jobs, and deliver long-term benefits for Alaskans. I appreciate the committee’s work and look forward to continued progress as this important bill now moves to the House floor and on to the Senate.”

https://x.com/i/status/2064829864834892047

The House Finance Committee includes Representatives Jeremy Bynum (R-Ketchikan), Sara Hannon (D-Juneau), Nellie Unangiq Jimmie (D-Toksook Bay), Alyse Galvin (NA-Anchorage), Will Stapp (R-Fairbanks), Elexie Moore (R-Wasilla), Jamie Allard (R-Eagle River), Calvin Schrage (NA-Anchorage), Andy Josephson (D-Anchorage), Neal Foster (D-Nome), and Frank Tomaszewski (R-Fairbanks).

Opinion: Two Dan Sullivans and the Death of an Honest Ballot 

6
Incumbent U.S. Senator Dan Sullivan

By State Representative Kevin McCabe (R-Big Lake)

I have often argued that Ranked Choice Voting, and especially the jungle primary that came with it, rewards political camouflage and punishes political clarity. It encourages candidates to blur distinctions, avoid firm positions, and present themselves as something they are not. I have called it structured dishonesty built into the system itself. What I did not expect was to see the camouflage become this literal. 

As of this week, Alaska voters may find themselves looking at two Dan Sullivans on the ballot in the 2026 US Senate race. One is our sitting United States Senator, a retired Marine, former Attorney General, and a public servant, Dan S. Sullivan, whose record is well known to Alaskans. The other is a relatively unknown candidate from Petersburg who filed at the eleventh hour and whose campaign materials have been linked to a progressive political consultant. The National Republican Senatorial Committee has raised concerns about what many Alaskans are already wondering: when you cannot beat a candidate on his record, do you try to make it harder for voters to find him on the ballot? 

To be fair, facts matter. The Peltola campaign denies any involvement. The second Mr. Sullivan says he is running a legitimate campaign. I do not know who encouraged whom to run, and I will not pretend to know facts I cannot prove. 

But I do know this: a system that creates an opportunity for this kind of tactic has a problem. 

And make no mistake about why anyone would bother. This race was never just about Alaska. 

Chuck Schumer recruited Mary Peltola into it himself. His allied groups have already spent millions going after Senator Sullivan, and the campaign has barely started. Senator Sullivan has said Schumer is prepared to spend millions more to beat him. They are not spending that kind of money because they care about Alaska. They are spending it because control of the United States Senate may come down to this one seat. If Schumer flips Alaska, he and the same anti-Alaska Democrats who fight our drilling, our development, and our way of life are one step closer to running the Senate. What happens on our ballot will be felt far beyond our borders, and it will be felt here in Alaska for decades. 

Call it the RCV Nuclear Option. 

If political operatives believe they cannot beat an incumbent, they find someone with the same name and put that person on the ballot. Maybe it works, maybe it does not. That is not really the point. The fact that anyone would even consider it a viable political strategy tells you something important about the RCV system itself. Voters should never have to wonder whether the name they marked is actually the person they intended to support. 

Some defenders of the current system will point out that ballots include middle initials and other identifying information. Fair enough. But if election officials have to explain to voters how to tell two candidates with the same name apart, the problem is already obvious. Elections are supposed to be straightforward.  The incumbent Alaska Senator, the Republican Senator, is Daniel S. Sullivan and voters should not need a guidebook to figure out which candidate is which. The burden should be on the system to provide clarity, not on voters to navigate confusion that never should have existed in the first place.  

This is the rotten fruit of Ballot Measure 2. 

I have said since it was first placed on the ballot, that the greatest weakness in Alaska’s current election system is not even the ranking process itself. It is the jungle primary, where every candidate from every party is thrown onto the same ballot and the top four advance. That is exactly where two identical names can do their damage. Confuse enough voters, split enough support, and a strong candidate can be pushed down the field before the ranked-choice process even begins. What was once an occasional accident in a crowded race becomes a tactic available to anyone willing to exploit the rules. 

This would have been far less likely under the system Alaska had before outside money sold voters on “reform.” Republicans selected a Republican nominee. Democrats selected a Democratic nominee. Candidates appeared on the general-election ballot with clear labels and clear distinctions. The genius of that system was not that it was perfect. It was that it was legible. A voter could read it. 

Supporters of Ranked Choice Voting promised more civility, broader appeal, and elections that better reflected the will of the people. Instead, every election cycle seems to reveal another weakness. We have seen exhausted ballots. We have seen outcomes that leave voters questioning whether they were fully represented. And now we may see two candidates with the same name competing for votes in one of Alaska’s most important races. 

In November, Alaskans will again have the opportunity to decide whether this system should remain in place. Wherever you stand on that question, we should all be able to agree on one basic principle: elections should be clear, transparent, and worthy of public trust. 

Two Dan Sullivans on one ballot is not transparency. 

It’s a sneaky magic trick. 

And Alaskans deserve an election, not a sleight of hand. 

Alaska Lt. Governor Investigates Validity of Petersburg Dan’s Filing for U.S. Senate Against Incumbent Dan Sullivan

A man of the name Dan Sullivan from Petersburg has filed to run against incumbent U.S. Senator Dan Sullivan for Alaska’s U.S. Senate seat up for election this November. Petersburg Dan, who filed as a Republican, stands accused of running with the intention to confuse voters and cheat incumbent Dan Sullivan of votes.

Alaska’s Lieutenant Governor, Nancy Dahlstrom, opened an investigation into Peterburg Dan’s campaign validity. She sent a letter to Petersburg Dan, stating, “I’m troubled by the allegation that you filed for office in coordination with another campaign with the intention of confusing Alaskan voters in a way that will benefit one candidate over another. If true, it suggests that your declaration of candidacy, which was submitted under penalty of perjury, was not genuine and not properly filed. For these reasons, this letter serves as notice that I have requested an investigation of your recent declaration of candidacy for United States Senate before determining whether you can appear on the ballot and, if you can appear, in what manner your name will appear on the ballot.”

In her letter, Dahlstrom says there are “credible allegations” that Petersburg Dan filed “out of intention to confuse and manipulate voters by capitalizing on the fact that you share a first and last name with the incumbent senator.”

Dahlstrom writes that Petersburg Dan sent a letter on June 3 “responding to these allegations,” but that the letter “did not adequately respond to the specific allegations.” She then asks Petersburg Dan to respond to several specific questions regarding certain campaign decisions and potential connections to Democratic strategists. She asks whether he would object to his name appearing on the ballot as “Sullivan, Daniel James Jr. (non-incumbent)” to avoid voter confusion.

Petersburg Dan must provide his responses in an affidavit signed under penalty of perjury on or before noon on Wednesday, June 10, 2026.

Senator Sullivan, who believes Petersburg Dan is a “sham” candidate recruited by Democrats, stated he would file a lawsuit if Petersburg Dan remains on the ballot. “He is a liberal progressive,” said Senator Sullivan in an interview with CNN’s Manu Raju. “We’ve seen his donations to all the far-left groups. He’s donated to Peltola. And his whole purpose of running is to confuse Alaskans to make Alaskan voters think that somehow he’s me, so they could rig the vote in favor of Mary Peltola.”

Senator Sullivan is the target of a large-scale Democrat smear campaign to manipulate voters.

Readers can access Dahlstrom’s June 8th letter and Petersburg Dan’s June 3rd letter here:

Opinion: The Hard Job of Conserving America’s Identity and Fighting Progressive Chaos

The nation is buzzing with excitement with the upcoming 250th Anniversary of the United States of America, this July 4, 2026. Celebrations are being organized throughout the states, Americans are taking time to reflect on the state of our nation, and the desire to fight for the good of America is being rekindled in all who love our dear country.

America turns 250 years old during a time of intense political polarization and animosity. On the left are Americans who believe America has an evolving identity that should progress toward a universal world order that secures what they believe to be human happiness.

On the right are Americans who believe America has a fixed identity that must be protected, conserved, and honored. To the conservative mind, progressive policies do not improve America, they confuse her. They befuddle her with a myriad of contradicting philosophies and leave her in a state of mental crisis.

A strong sense of identity is essential to a strong and healthy mind. Identity confusion creates chaos, instability, and mental crisis whether in a individual’s life or in a country’s cultural life.

So, who is America?

That is the question every conservative must face if they hope to be effective against progressive forces. For what it is worth, liberals know what they want. They have a utopian vision that they are working toward with fierce consistency and strategy.

Love requires deep understanding of whom you love. If we are to love America, we must understand her, not recreate her. That is where conservatism begins.

Unfortunately, partly due to leftist efforts in education and media, many conservatives either lack a deep understanding of America’s identity or they simply have given up fighting for it.

No man or woman is an island. We exist in society, in what Aristotle coined the polis. According to Aristotle, humans are political creatures. To exist outside the polis is to deny part of your identity as a human being.

Conservation does not happen as a default. On the contrary, decay is the default, a law we see in nature as well as in politics. Conserving America’s values, principles, history, and identity is hard work.

Similar to the impossibility of expressing a loved one’s entire identity in a few words, we cannot expect to capture America in her essence without writing volume after volume. And indeed, volume after volume have been written seeking to answer that question. Yet, there are qualities of our dear America that ought to unite conservatives across the nation.

Politically, America is a Democratic-Republic with a governing structure that gives the power to the people first and foremost, insists on checks-and-balances between three branches of government (Executive, Legislative, and Judicial), and rejects despotism.

Economically, America is a free-market capitalist country. Socialism and communism are foreign to her and poisonous.

Culturally, America is God-fearing. Despite how far our country has wandered from her founding principles enshrined in our founding documents, America cannot reject God without rejecting her own identity. The Declaration of Independence is clear: We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness. Inalienable rights are endowed by the Divine Creator without whom there is no basis for our rights other than whatever rights the government decides to bestow. The principle that God, not the government, gives us our rights is essential to America’s identity.

These founding principles are the lifeblood of America and if we do not protect her, her heart will grow cold, and she will be buried among the other nations who were once great.

Help Us Provide Conservative Media for Generations to Come

Alaskans deserve honest, quality conservative media that delivers not only now, but in every generation. We are building a Must Read Alaska to last through generations as each generation steps forward to love and defend America.

In honor of America’s 250, we are offering a 25% discount on all plans now through July 4th for American patriots who join us in promoting logical, conservative, pro-industry, pro-family values in media and politics.

In For News: Get just the Must Read news to your inbox daily plus more benefits! $5/ month $3.75/ month or $50/ year $37.50/ year
All In: Get the Must Read news and opinions to your inbox daily plus more benefits! $10/ month $7.50/ month or $100/ year $75/ year
In For God and Country: Get ALL Must Read content to your inbox daily, ad credits for your local Alaska business, plus more benefits: $500/ year $375/ year

To Claim Your 25% Discount:
1. CLICK HERE
2. Choose your plan
3. Enter code: MRAK25

Thank you for reading Must Read Alaska!

Alaskan – Conservative – Innovative – Enduring

Opinion: The “Why Now” Answer to the LNG Special Session Is Tied to Deadline for Carbon Credits

The following article is a partial reprint of the article “The AKLNG Pipeline’s 30-Day Window,” originally published on the author’s personal Substack, June 1, 2026.

In December 2022, three and a half years before this special session, Governor Dunleavy published an op-ed titled “Alaska’s Map to Clean Hydrogen Leadership.” He wrote that natural gas is a key ingredient for hydrogen production, that increasing global demand for low-carbon hydrogen is fueling progress for Alaska LNG, and that Alaska is well positioned to compete because of its geology suited for carbon capture and its vast gas supply. The op-ed was published on RealClearEnergy and hosted on the AGDC website.

That same month, AGDC submitted a concept paper to the U.S. Department of Energy seeking $850 million in federal hydrogen hub funding. The Alaska Hydrogen Hub concept anticipated producing more than 600 tons of clean hydrogen per day, using North Slope natural gas feedstock via the Alaska LNG project and sequestering the captured carbon dioxide in underground geological formations. AGDC initially refused to release the concept paper. The DOE discouraged the application.

In June 2022, Governor Dunleavy concluded a trade mission to Japan. The AGDC newsroom described his meetings as covering Alaska’s potential to export blue and green hydrogen as part of Japan’s energy transition, alongside LNG.

In 2025, Dunleavy’s Alaska Clean Energy Week proclamation described the Alaska LNG project as including a “carbon removal and sequestration plant” and characterized it as “among the lowest carbon impact projects on the planet.” That is not a description of a natural gas export project. It is a description of a carbon credit architecture.

None of this appeared in the urgency argument for the special session. The urgency argument was “LNG market window.”

The Deadline Nobody Will Name

The Legislature’s own oil and gas consultant, GaffneyCline Senior Director Nicholas Fulford, told the Senate Finance Committee on May 27 that natural gas “is not the driver” of the project’s economics and that it “is not worth much.” If the LNG market window is the urgency and LNG is not the driver, the urgency argument contradicts itself in testimony from the state’s own paid advisor.

There is one deadline in the public record with a specific date attached to this project’s actual economic architecture. The One Big Beautiful Bill Act, signed into law on July 4, 2025, extended the Section 45V clean hydrogen production tax credit but moved the construction commencement deadline forward to December 31, 2027. The special session’s bill, SB 2001, contains a construction commencement trigger of January 1, 2028. Those two dates are identical. That is not a coincidence in drafting.

The 45V credit pays up to $3 per kilogram of qualifying clean hydrogen produced, for ten years, to projects that begin construction before January 1, 2028. On the separate 45Q carbon capture side, the credit is worth approximately $85 per ton of CO2 sequestered, an estimated $595 million annually to the project operator at projected volumes. Alaska’s return from that activity under HB 50, the 2024 carbon storage law, is $2.50 per ton. Less than three cents on every dollar of federal credit value generated using Alaska’s geology.

The Governor has been describing this architecture in public since 2022. He described it as Alaska’s hydrogen leadership map. He described it at trade missions in Japan. He described it in AGDC’s federal funding applications. What he has not described, in this special session, is the December 31, 2027 IRS construction commencement deadline that explains the 30-day clock better than any LNG market condition.

The State’s Own Advisor Said Wait

GaffneyCline’s December 2025 report to the Legislative Budget and Audit Committee, written by the same Fulford who testified in the special session, stated plainly that a definitive fiscal framework for the project “cannot yet be contemplated” because the required detailed economic model does not exist. Six months later, the special session is being asked to pass exactly that definitive fiscal framework, permanently, in 30 days, without the model.

The state’s own chief economist told Senate Finance that the project’s cost could reflect a 100% increase over the $46 billion public figure, putting the range between $46 and $92 billion. The Senate Finance co-chair called the $46 billion figure “complete garbage.” Fulford called the cost baseline “wishful thinking.” No updated figure has been provided by the developer.

The legislature is being asked to set a permanent tax rate on infrastructure of unknown cost, on a 30-day clock, to meet a federal tax credit deadline that nobody in the urgency campaign will name, while the social pressure apparatus attacks legislators who order dinner during remote hearings.