Friday, May 8, 2026
Home Blog Page 301

Ballot boxes set ablaze in Vancouver, Wash. and Portland, Ore.

Ballot drop boxes with completed ballots were set on fire overnight in Vancouver, Wash. and Portland, Ore., home of the radical Antifa movement. Vancouver is a slightly conservative community across the river from Portland. Police suspect arson in both of the fires.

The Portland drop box had a fire suppression system inside the box, and only three ballots were damaged.

Hundreds of ballots were damaged north of the river, however, in spite of the fire suppression system supposedly installed in the “secure” ballot drop box. The drop box was on the east side of Vancouver, near Fisher’s Creek, which closer to Camas, a very conservative-voting area.

That region of southwest Washington is the state’s 3rd congressional district and where one of the tightest races in the country is happening.

First-term Democrat Rep. Marie Glusenkamp Perez, who is co-chairs the Rural Antifa Blue Dog Democrats in Congress with Alaska Rep. Mary Peltola, is facing a Republican challenger — Joe Kent.

Earlier this month, a ballot drop box was set on fire in Portland and police say all three arson instances appear to be connected.

Last week in Phoenix, about 20 ballots were destroyed, and others were damaged when a fire was set in a mailbox.

Red sky in the morning, the nation has had its warning

By TOM BURBAGE | REAL CLEAR DEFENSE

We are a nation somewhere between the proverbial “Red Skies.”

The warning signals have been sent. It remains to be seen if they are enough to clear the troubling skies or not. There is a historical resilience to our unique constitutional republic form of government that pulls our nation back from the brink in times of desperation. ย The fundamental roots run deep and have weathered the storms of time so far.

But there has been a long-term corrosion infecting those roots. We have a generational responsibility to preserve the America we inherited from earlier generations and leave a legacy for those that come behind.

All sailors have a healthy respect for corrosion. It can sink their ships and end their livelihood. Webster defines corrosion as the long-term gradual deterioration of materials in reaction to their environment. As a firm believer that the laws of nature are much more powerful than the laws of human logic, the analogy applies well to the political world we now find ourselves and our nation in.

In nature, the roots of corrosion take time and have many tentacles. In politics, these same tentacles have been allowed to run deep over the last few decades. Their slow deterioration of American ideals is now playing havoc with our ability to even recognize the America we were handed from our fathers and forefathers. The pillars of our constitutional republic are rusty and getting rustier.

When was the last time schools taught Americaโ€™s core virtues and values in a classroom that also had an American flag in the corner? Who can list the fundamentals of our Constitution; three equal branches of government; free and fair elections; patriotism; Judeo-Christian fundamentals; government by the people? Does it really matter? The rust is getting thicker.

Galvanizing is another law of nature that provides a layer of protection for the impervious nature of rust. It also has a second definition โ€œto cause someone to suddenly take action by shocking or exciting them in some way. The rust on our American Dream cannot be reversed without galvanizing a national willingness to preserve those virtues and values.

Sometimes rust creeps in and we donโ€™t really notice it until we see a leak in the roof (or the hull of our sailorโ€™s boat). Examples of creeping rust include indoctrinating our youth by gaining control of public schools and teachers unions. Manipulating opinions by controlling the news media and Hollywood. Corroding fundamental value systems by denigrating the role of the family and the church. Reducing parental rights and fundamentals by making transgenderism and sexual perversion seem normal, natural and healthy.

Once the rust becomes obvious, it spreads faster and has greater impact. Who can explain the rusting logic of dissolving borders which are clearly bankrupting social welfare systems and influencing free and fair election processes? Why are we allowing rust into our free and fair election processes under the guise of continuing questionable pandemic exceptions when we are clearly not in a pandemic.

Time to stop incentivizing rust and once and for all galvanize the American boat. It has a severely rusting hull. Take the time to understand the precipice our nation is on and understand that the only rust repellant is a strong vote for galvanizing the Constitution.

Hoping for a red sky at night soon.


Captain Tom Burbageย (USN, ret.) is a Naval Academy graduate (class of โ€™69) and President of theย Calvert Task Group.

This article was originally published by RealClearDefense and made available via RealClearWire.

Environmental activists draft plan for Kamala Harris to clamp down on fossil fuels

A new report from Bloomberg reveals that there’s a “Project 2025” under way for Kamala Harris, should she become president, and it involves taking an aggressive stance to cut fossil fuels and American energy production.

Bloomberg says the plan is largely secret and the environmental groups behind it are trying to keep undecided voters in the key battleground states from being spooked.

The plan involves using the president’s executive powers on Day 1 to:

1. Limit liquefied natural gas exports.

2. Shut down Energy Transfer LPโ€™s Dakota Access Pipeline, which carries oil from North Dakota to Illinois.

3. Push for a swift end to oil and gas production using special emergency authority to bar crude exports.

4. Curb U.S. public investment in foreign fossil fuel projects.

5. Open a federal investigation of the oil and gas industryโ€™s approach to the “climate crisis.”

“Environmentalists and former advisers have outlined their prescriptions for ways a victorious Harris could build on Biden-era climate initiatives โ€” including the sweepingย Inflation Reduction Actโ€” to drive more US clean energy deployment and winnow planet-warming pollution worldwide. And some activists are pushing a harder line, developing blueprints for Harris to stanch flows of US oil and gas if the Democrat prevails over Republican Donald Trump,” Bloomberg writes in its Green Daily newsletter.

John Stossel: Do we need laws that allow for free-range kids?

By JOHN STOSSEL

What does it take for a parent to get arrested?

Surprisingly little.

Scott and Heather Wallace of Hewitt, Texas, encourage their three boys to play outside on their own to build independence.

One day, driving home from karate practice, 8-year-old Aiden misbehaved. So, half a mile from home, Heather stopped the car and told him, โ€œWalk the rest of the way on your own.โ€

Heโ€™d done it before. But this time, before he got home, someone called the police.

โ€œThereโ€™s a little boy walking down the sidewalk,โ€ the individual told 911. โ€œHeโ€™s a perfect target for somebody to kidnap!โ€

Police picked Aiden up and drove him home.

โ€œYou werenโ€™t worried about [Aiden]?โ€ I ask them.

โ€œNot at all,โ€ says Heather.

Scott adds, โ€œItโ€™s a safe neighborhood.โ€

Itโ€™s true. Based on data from the FBI, their town is among the safest in Texas.

Nevertheless, the cops arrested Heather! They kept her in jail overnight.

โ€œIt was terrifying,โ€ she tells me. โ€œI was just waiting, crying.โ€

The cop told her, โ€œTo have an 8-year-old โ€ฆ walk by himself, thatโ€™s a big problem. โ€ฆ We donโ€™t know whoโ€™s in that white van.โ€

Thatโ€™s just dumb, says Lenore Skenazy, author of โ€œFree-Range Kids.โ€

โ€œ99.99% of white vans are guys coming to fix your toilet or mow your lawn.โ€

She says ignorant media misleads us about whatโ€™s really dangerous. News reports cite Justice Department data and claim โ€œ460,000 kids are reported missing every year!โ€

But that just means: โ€œ460,000 children are late for dinner, stayed at school and forgot to tell their mom. โ€ฆ The definition of โ€˜missingโ€™ is missing for an hour!โ€

Kidnappings by strangers are extremely rare. Just being in a car is 400 times more dangerous.

โ€œYou donโ€™t see people saying, โ€˜I could put Johnny in the car, but what if weโ€™re T-boned?โ€ Skenazy points out. โ€œWeโ€™ve come up with a culture that sees a kid outside and fantasizes not just something bad but the very worst-case scenario.โ€

The officer who picked up Aiden argued the worst-case: โ€œYou have a lot of crazy people out here,โ€ he told Heather. โ€œI donโ€™t trust my child out of range [of] about 20 or 30 feet from me.โ€

20 or 30 feet?

โ€œIt was a lot of his opinion,โ€ Heather tells me.

Police officers can act on their opinions.

Local prosecutors went even further. They indicted Heather, claiming she placed her son in โ€œimminent danger of deathโ€ and acted โ€œagainst the peace and dignity of the state.โ€

Really!

When her employer heard that, Heather lost her job.

Good thing officials werenโ€™t this obsessed with stranger danger when I was a kid. I walked half-a-mile every school day.

Crime was much worse then. Even including recent upticks, crime has dropped sharply over the past 30 years.

Whatโ€™s changed is media hysteria. Any dramatic incident, anywhere, appears instantly on our phones. Frightened, gullible, math-illiterate officials say, better safe than sorry.

Now Scott and Heather say that, too.

โ€œWill you drop your kids off again?โ€ I ask.

โ€œNo!โ€ says Heather. โ€œWeโ€™re scared.โ€

โ€œItโ€™s not that we donโ€™t think it was the right decision,โ€ says Scott, โ€œBut what they decided for us was not very affordable. [Now] we donโ€™t even leave them in the car to go into the convenience store.โ€

โ€œNot because someoneโ€™s going to take them,โ€ Heather adds, โ€œbut because someoneโ€™s going to see and call the police!โ€

Lenore Skenazy has persuaded eight states to pass โ€œchildhood independenceโ€ laws. They clarify that letting kids do things on their own isnโ€™t abuse.

โ€œYou donโ€™t want the government telling you when you can let your kids do things,โ€ she says. โ€œYou know your children better than they do.โ€

Every Tuesday at JohnStossel.com, Stossel posts a new video about the battle between government and freedom. He is the author of โ€œGive Me a Break: How I Exposed Hucksters, Cheats, and Scam Artists and Became the Scourge of the Liberal Media.โ€

The views and opinions expressed in this commentary are those of the author and do not reflect the official position of the Daily Caller News Foundation.

Does Murkowski really believe in ranked-choice voting? Maybe not so much

No sooner had Sen. Lisa Murkowski starred in an advertisement supporting the preservation of ranked-choice voting, than she evidently has no intention of ranking in the presidential race. Ranking, evidently, is for suckers.

Murkowski, a registered Republican, told the Anchorage Daily News she will not vote for either Kamala Harris or Donald Trump. If she is telling the truth, that leaves her the choice of ranking six other candidates.

That leaves her candidates like radical Aurora Party Cornel West, Libertarian Chase Oliver, or Green Party Jill Stein. It’s difficult to imagine that moderate Murkowski would vote for any of those arguably fringe candidates.

Ranked-choice voting was, Murkowski and proponents promised, going to provide more moderate candidates. The system in Alaska was designed to help Murkowski avoid going through a party primary, which she would never again be able to win after her hostility to President Donald Trump.

But the presidential candidates go through the party nomination or petition process, and are not subject to the open primary. Thus, they are candidates who reach the ballot the old fashioned way — via the parties themselves — a system she cannot support.

But she’s also said she was voting for Democrat Mary Peltola for Congress, and appears to be unlikely to fill in the bubble for Nick Begich as her second choice. She has refused to even meet with Begich. Murkowski mentioned Peltola in her endorsement to sympathetic news media outlets, and did not indicate she would be ranking anyone else.

Dunleavy makes appearance at NYC Trump rally, while Kamala Democrats call Trump ‘Hitler! Fascist!’

Alaska Gov. Mike Dunleavy was an invited guest of former President Donald Trump at a campaign rally at Madison Square Gardens in New York City.

Tens of thousands came to the event to hear Trump speak. Also spotted at the event was former Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin and several sitting congressional representatives. Among invited speakers were former first ladyย Melania Trump, vice presidential candidate Ohio Sen. JD Vance, business entrepreneurย Elon Musk, political commentator Tucker Carlson, former presidential candidate Robert F. Kennedy Jr. and others.

People waited for as long as 24 hours to get into the event, in which Trump channeled President Ronald Reagan, asking the crowd if they are โ€œbetter off than you were four years ago.โ€ The response was a resounding “NO!”

The Democratic National Committee, meanwhile, is on the “super-Nazi” theme — and it’s everywhere in their messaging across all media.

The Democrats projected digital bright images onย Madison Square Garden’sย exterior during the Trump event, which compared Trump to Adolf Hitler. That message was echoed throughout the Democrats’ other digital messaging, including in words uttered by Kamala Harris this past several days, comparing Trump to Hitler, who was responsible of the mass extermination of Jews, which led to World War II.

Asked on CNN if she thinks Trump is a fascist, Kamala Harris said this week, “Yes, I do.”

Even Minnesota Gov. Tim Walz stuck to the Democrats’ Hitleresque talking points. As the vice presidential nominee for Harris, he said Trumpโ€™s Sunday rally at New Yorkโ€™s Madison Square Garden was just like one that Hitler held there in 1939.

โ€œDonald Trumpโ€™sย got this big rally going at Madison Square Garden,โ€ Walzย said atย anย event inย Nevada. โ€œThereโ€™s a direct parallel to a big rally that happened in the mid-1930s at Madison Square Garden.โ€

Henceforth, anyone who has an event at Madison Square Gardens will be smeared with the same Nazi brush, since it was a venue once used by the leader of Germany.

According to the Democrats’ logic, that will also stretch back to President John F. Kennedy in 1962, and President Bill Clinton in 1992. For that matter, the Democrats are smearing the Nazi brand on President Franklin D. Roosevelt, who spoke there in 1936. All were Democrats.

In his 1936 campaign speech at Madison Square Gardens, FDR called the banking industry and military hardware industries “enemies of peace.”

“For 12 years this Nation was afflicted with hear-nothing, see-nothing, do-nothing Government. The Nation looked to Government but the Government looked away. Nine mocking years with the golden calf and three long years of the scourge! Nine crazy years at the ticker and three long years in the breadlines! Nine mad years of mirage and three long years of despair! Powerful influences strive today to restore that kind of government with its doctrine that that Government is best which is most indifferent,” FDR said at Madison Square Gardens.

“For nearly four years you have had an Administration which instead of twirling its thumbs has rolled up its sleeves. We will keep our sleeves rolled up. We had to struggle with the old enemies of peaceโ€”business and financial monopoly, speculation, reckless banking, class antagonism, sectionalism, war profiteering,” FDR said.

“They had begun to consider the Government of the United States as a mere appendage to their own affairs. We know now that Government by organized money is just as dangerous as Government by organized mob. Never before in all our history have these forces been so united against one candidate as they stand today. They are unanimous in their hate for meโ€”and I welcome their hatred,” FDR said. His entire speech transcript can be read here.

FDR then spoke like Donald Trump does now, except that the Democrats now see that as Nazism.

Harpies for Harris take the stage to scream at men

The joy is gone, and the rage is on stage at the Kamala Harris for president campaign. Harris was joined by former First Lady Michelle Obama on Saturday at a campaign event in Michigan, during which the two scolded and screamed men for not supporting Harris without question.

After a generation of feminists denigrating men, the event in Kalamazoo may have been a bit tone deaf for the men watching from afar. Men in America may have lost interest in being being nagged into voting for someone who promises to deliver four years of scolding.

“To the women listening: We have every right to demand the men in our lives do better by us. We have to use our voices to make these choices clear to the men that we love. Our lives are worth more than their anger and disappointment,” Michelle Obama harped. “Your rage does not exist in a vacuum.”

As for Harris, she ranted about Trump, screaming at the audience that he should never stand behind the seal of the presidency again. It’s a line she uses repeatedly at rallies.

The Harris campaign, like the Mary Peltola campaign, is berating men into voting for Harris with “vote for Kamala or we’ll withhold our love and affection” messaging.

Glen Biegel: A conservative’s voting guide

By GLEN BIEGEL

I have been involved in politics for a long while here in Alaska.  Over the years, I have interacted with you in various ways, and year over year I produce this voters guide. These are my opinions and include research I have done to ensure Christian and liberty-minded ideals are well represented in government. 

2024, stark choices locally and nationally

Here is a good voter guide for Alaska.  Use your phone to take a picture of it, and take into the booth with you!

Locally in District 11/Senate F

I’ve had a chance to work closely with Julie Coulombe and James Kaufman over the last few years.ย  Truly citizen legislators, and fighting to keep government in its lane, and business well regulated, but healthy.ย The top local issues I have followed or discussed with them are:

Fiscal Responsibility:

-The Conservative Majority tried to get two pieces of a Fiscal Plan passed; a spending cap(HJR2) and passing a constitutional amendment to put the PFD in the constitution (HJR7).  HJR7 did not signify an amount, just a simple phrase โ€™shall be paid.โ€™  The Democrats voted against both.  The Democrat Minority also put forward a multitude of budget amendments and legislation that would have added hundreds of millions of dollars to the state budget.  The Majority stopped the proposed spending. They also voted against multiple amendments Reps Coulombe and Carpenter put forward to cut the operating budget.

Protecting girls:

-The Majority passed HB 183 that prevents men and boys from playing in womenโ€™s and girls’ sport competitions. The Democrats voted against it.

Cook Inlet gas shortage:

-The Majority supported oil and gas development. The Minority, through unreasonable process, taxes, or stability, regularly thwarts oil and gas development.   For instance, the Conservative Majority voted for and passed additional gas storage (CSHB394) to make sure we have enough gas during the coldest winter months. Most of the Minority voted against it, including the Anchorage delegation (Anti Hilcorp). The bill was rolled into a bigger bill and was ultimately passed and signed.  The Minority also consistently fought against Royalty relief, the Majority supported it because it applied only to NEW gas and oil drilling in the Cook Inlet.  The Democrats aren’t sufficiently concerned about reliable gas to heat our homes.

Coloumbe’s District 11 race (This plays out across Anchorage and Alaska generally):

  • Coulombe has repeatedly demonstrated her intent to smartly reduce the size of government and put more resources into public safety and infrastructure. A surprising distinction is Featherly appears to believe the State should drill in Cook Inlet, instead of the private sector.
  • Featherly, the house candidate, has said at multiple forums he doesnโ€™t think we spend enough on government and wants to grow the size of government. This is a consistent position difference between the parties and the Democrats’ push for larger government which jeopardizes the dividend and will swiftly lead to an income tax.
  • Featherly supports Ballot Measure 1 which is anti small business, Coulombe opposes it. 
  • A strong dividing line between parties also plays out in public funding of abortion. Coulombe opposes and Featherly supports public funding. 

Kaufman and Park had position differences that echo the differences between Coulombe and Featherly.  For those outside of District 11 and Senate F, I have tried to concentrate on consistent differences between the two ideologies/parties.  

I strongly support Kaufman and Coulombe.

Nationally and Statewide:

Again, please take a look at the voter guide.

Most haven’t heard Nick Begich speak much less sit with him for 2 hours at dinner.  It’s kind of funny, not like funny ‘haha’, when I watch the political ads.  I watched the one about creating jobs in India. 

I graduated from UAA in 1993 with a computer science degree.  There were 9 computer science graduates.  There were 200+ sociology, 200+ psychology, 200+ general majors (enough credits, but no specific major).  The problem with the ad complaining about Nick’s business is that he doesn’t pick what degree people graduate from college with.  

I have to say, I like Nick. His biggest recommendation to be our Representative is that the Washington elites didn’t want him, and it took a huge effort from Party leadership to convince Washington that we needed only one candidate and that was Nick Begich. 

Nick is a pro-life conservative businessman, who will be fiscally responsible. 

The problem for Democrats (and they are all nearly identical ideologically, especially if you count that Peltolaย supported Hakeem Jeffries 18 times for speaker) is they are dealing a bad hand for Alaska.ย  Biden (with Harris’ support) has had 66 executive ordersย limiting or terminating development and other rights in Alaska.ย  Democrats are a bad match for Alaska, our jobs, our freedoms, and our security.

I also support Donald Trump for his demonstrated ability to select Supreme Court Justices, his successes in keeping energy costs low, inflation down, and his endless support for Alaska.  

Please vote.

Glen Biegel is a technology security professional, Catholic father of nine, husband to a saint, and politically active conservative.

Willow weasel busted: Peltola slammed for taking credit for oil project, when her record is anti-oil

Congressman Pete Stauber of Minnesota has a few words for Alaskans who are being told by Rep. Mary Peltola that she should get credit for the Biden Administration’s approval of the Willow project on the North Slope.

Stauber says she is lying.

“Alaskans need to remember that it was Donald Trump that approved the Willow Project, not Joe Biden,” Stauber said. “In fact, it was the Biden-Harris Administration that halted this project in its tracks and ultimately curtailed the scope and size of the project. While Rep. Peltola may have voiced her concern about the Biden-Harris Administration’s attempt to stop the project, it was Democrats who jeopardized its future in the first place.”

Biden finally allowed the project to go forward after being warned by federal attorneys that he would lose in court.

“I know that Nick Begich will stand with the people of Alaska against the overreach by out-of-touch Washington Democrats,” Stauber said.

Peltola is being challenged by Begich, a Republican, in what is one of the most watched congressional races in the country. He is pro-business, pro-freedom, and pro-Alaskan. Peltola has been coopted by the Democratic National Committee and its subsidiaries, which are anti-oil, anti-freedom, and anti-Alaska. Her anti-Alaska votes are demonstrated by the 18 times she voted for New York Rep. Hakeem Jeffries for House Speaker.

Earlier this year, when Stauber tried to help Alaska’s economy by sponsoring the Alaska’s Right to Produce Act, Peltola double-crossed him and burned the olive branch he was trying to extend to her across the political aisle.

After signing on as a sponsor, she refused to vote for the legislation to open back up the oil patch on the North Slope, and she slipped a note to her Democrat colleagues, telling them to vote against her own bill, which pass the Republican-led House.