Thursday, May 7, 2026
Home Blog Page 280

Win Gruening: Mired in bureaucracy, Juneau’s long-term flood fix advances at glacial pace

By WIN GRUENING

During meetings in Juneau last week, United States Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) officials said it will likely take a decade or more to research and implement a long-term solution to Mendenhall River flooding.

This was not what Juneau homeowners wanted to hear. 

When asked why it takes so long to conduct the modeling and studies required, officials pointed to bureaucracy as the problem. “There’s a lot of agencies involved. There’s the reality of the process of government and democracy, how fast it moves.”  

USACE, U.S. Forest Service, Natural Resources Conservation Service, NOAA, the National Weather Service, and the EPA were examples of agencies that must weigh in.

USACE officials noted that Juneau’s flood mitigation project is only one of many they are working on, and their resources are limited by their budget and staffing.

That’s not to suggest that nothing is happening. The meetings last week focused on short-term mitigation measures that city officials are considering.

USACE has offered to provide four miles of HESCO barriers for free that would be used to block potential flooding along the Mendenhall River. Last month the Assembly approved spending $2 million toward the cost of installing the first phase of the project, now estimated at $7.8 million (including periodic maintenance and removal).

It’s possible the cost could be lower depending on available government programs or grants.

The exact design and placement of the barriers is undetermined and dependent on preliminary modeling/maps that should be available prior to the proposed HESCO barrier installation next March. These studies are important since some fear that partial safeguards could result in moving flood water to a different area of the river where there is less protection.

Most barriers would be placed on private riverfront properties, possibly for as long as ten years. Concerns and objections have been voiced, not the least of which is who bears the cost. The Assembly has introduced an ordinance proposing to split the entire cost 50-50 between the city and affected homeowners through an established Local Improvement District. About 466 homeowners, identified by flood inundation maps as being at risk in the event of a 16-foot flood event, would pay about $8,000 each as part of the proposed LID.

Community feedback will determine whether the LID is approved but the process will delay a final decision until next March.

Regardless of the placement, repayment structure, and final approval of the HESCO barrier project, affected homeowners are looking at the prospect of waiting 10 years or longer for a permanent resolution. They will find it extremely difficult to improve or sell their home while living under the threat of a catastrophic flood.

One citizen group that was formed in response to this emergency, Juneau Flood Solution Advocates, now includes several hundred members. They are actively working to “unite the flood-affected community of Mendenhall Valley in response to the challenges posed by glacial outbursts.”

This group’s primary concern is with the length of time it will take to study, design, and construct a long-term solution. City leaders have proceeded slowly and taken the position they must accept USACE recommendations. This seems overly cautious given that the assessed value of residential structures at risk approaches $1.5 billion.

Why accept at face value that a long-term general investigative study will cost $6 million and take five years or more to complete? 

Why investigate solutions such as tunneling through mountains or bombing glaciers that are risky and unlikely to work? 

Selecting one or two solutions (a Mendenhall Lake levee and diversion channels, for example) which have been proven successful elsewhere could cut study time and cost dramatically. 

Yet, the Juneau officials have committed $3 million in matching funds for this $6 million study that is now stuck in limbo because funding to complete it hasn’t been secured.

Where is the sense of urgency? Can city officials not forcefully advocate for a legislative solution to bypass the bureaucratic foot-dragging inherent in projects like this? Perhaps the Assembly could consider drafting a resolution to our Congressional delegation to begin negotiations for an alternative approach that cuts cost and time.

Juneau homeowners cannot afford to remain solely at the mercy of government agency red tape and timetables.

After retiring as the senior vice president in charge of business banking for Key Bank in Alaska, Win Gruening became a regular opinion page columnist for the Juneau Empire. He was born and raised in Juneau and graduated from the U.S. Air Force Academy in 1970. He is involved in various local and statewide organizations.

Terrence Shanigan: Alaska’s vulnerable election system betrays our Constitution

By TERRENCE SHANIGAN

This is the first part in a three-part series on Alaska election reform.

Alaska is a place where election issues are the norm, not the exception. As an Alaska Native from Bristol Bay, I am keenly familiar with the many issues that have surfaced over the years. 

To list a few: the lack of access to in-person voting; the ability to destroy ballots at the precinct level; the claims that many lack access to voter identification; and irregularities like those seen in the Senate race between Joe Miller and Sen. Lisa Murkowski that re-surfaced during the 2016 House race between challenger Dean Westlake and incumbent Rep. Ben Nageak. We also know that a series of data breaches between 2012 and 2024 compromised the voting data of most Alaskans. 

Cumulatively, cybersecurity failures, judicial activism, perceived bureaucratic interference, and apathy by the executive branch all add up to big problems with our elections. 

I have never stated or implied that fraud is a part of our election system. However, I have identified areas where we have the potential for significant errors, inaccuracies with ballot counting, and the need for strict accountability. The data security vulnerability should alarm everyone. Every Alaskan has had their HIPPA information compromised in the past few years, and 113,000 Alaskans had every part of their voting identifiers stolen by nefarious actors.

Was your information stolen? You may never know because the Division of Elections keeps this information to itself. Where is the callout from the legislature, the Division of Elections Director, or the Office of the Lieutenant Governor to share this information with the public? Full public disclosure should be our right under the law. 

The problems are systemic, and they have been around for decades. As more time passes, they compound without much improvement. The problems we see with our election system are well known, and these dysfunctions are embarrassing and undermine voter confidence.

Three overarching issues have emerged.

  • First, apathy by the executive branch for failing to embrace their constitutional obligation.
  • Second, judicial interference with the intent to undermine existing statutes and obstruct reform by circumventing the intent of the legislative branch.
  • Third, activism at different times by the Division of Elections.  

With such a high transient population, many Alaskans need more historical background of our election woes. Others, due to the passage of time, still need to be reminded of the headlines from past election cycles.

One thing remains constant, however, which is that career bureaucrats and the judiciary outlast short-term election cycles. 

Elections directors come and go, as do lieutenant governors, but all drink from the same glass. Few come in with the necessary knowledge of these problems, and fewer have the will to make the substantial changes we need, which compounds the problem. We have witnessed bureaucrats protect the status quo, not necessarily based on nefarious intent but rather on protectionism.

For years, legislators from both sides have unsuccessfully attempted to make election reforms. Sen. Mike Shower (R-Wasilla) is a long-time champion of election reform. Rep. Sarah Vance (R-Homer) has, in recent years, collaborated to propose meaningful reform. All too often, good legislation is hijacked by legislators filing amendments such as same-day registration with no voter ID—a deal breaker for 84 percent of Americans, according to a 2020 Monmouth University research poll and a 2024 Gallup poll. 

Serious election issues have been an ongoing problem in Alaska since 2010 during the write-in campaign between Joe Miller and U.S. Sen. Lisa Murkowski and, more specifically, legal challenges in House District 40. Here is a brief history of the more notable problems:  

In 2012, the Alaska Department of Health and Social Services (DHSS) breach had a portable hard drive stolen that exposed the personal information of approximately 500 Alaskans.

In 2014, during the hand count of mail-in and questioned ballots for the Bill Walker vs Sean Parnell race for governor, it was discovered that as many as 15 percent of Alaskans were improperly registered, resulting in the in-state legislative portion of their ballot being rejected.

In 2015, the Alaska Department of Administration experienced a cyberattack affecting over 700,000 Alaskans.

In 2016, Democrat primary incumbent Rep. Benjamin Nageak and challenger Dean Westlake experienced legal challenges and judicial interventions similar to Miller vs. Murkowski in 2010 in House District 40. 

In 2020, five days before the election, Alaska’s Online Voter Registration System was breached, and nefarious foreign actors stole the personal information of more than 113,000 Alaskans, enabling ballots to be printed online and cast without your knowledge.

In 2020, amid the Covid-19 pandemic, the Alaska Legislature, before it recessed, took up the question of whether a signature would still be required for mail-in ballots. The Legislature voted to keep the signature requirement and adjourned. Anchorage Superior Court Judge Dani Crosby then ruled in favor of the plaintiffs, the League of Women Voters of Alaska, stating that the witness signature requirement unconstitutionally burdened the right to vote amid the pandemic.

In 2021, another sophisticated cyberattack compromised Alaska’s DHSS system again, exposing all Alaskans’ personal and health information. 

In 2024, an Alaska Department of Corrections data exposure of the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) exposed protected health information to incarcerated individuals.

This pattern of serious security breaches continues to expose the vulnerabilities of Alaska’s election system. There has been a lack of action, which comes down to willful apathy from politicians and bureaucrats who appear content with turning a blind eye to fixing Alaska’s election issues.

The lieutenant governor should turn over every stone—and now—to answer any questions about the vulnerability of our election system before certifying an election. A dive into the many problems with Alaska’s election system will be explored in the second part of this series. If any Alaskan thinks they know a lot about Alaska’s election issues, just wait until you see what is under the hood.

Terrence Shanigan is a lifelong Alaskan of Sugpiaq descent from Bristol Bay. He is also the co-founder of Mission Critical, is a combat veteran, an honored husband and a dedicated father.

A rapid-fire day of Trump appointments

On Friday, Donald Trump announced several new appointments to key positions in his incoming administration.

Scott Bessent was nominated to serve as the 79th Secretary of the Treasury. “Scott is widely respected as one of the World’s foremost International Investors and Geopolitical and Economic Strategists. Scott’s story is that of the American Dream,” Trump said.

Scott Turner was nominated as secretary of the Department of Housing and Urban Development. Turner is chairman of the Center for Education Opportunity and served as executive director of the White House Opportunity and Revitalization Council in the first Trump Administration. He was in the Texas House of Representatives from 2013 to 2017.

Congresswoman Lori Chavez-DeRemer of Oregon, was nominated as Secretary of Labor. She is well-liked by the Teamsters.

Marty Makary MD, MPH, FACS, was named Food and Drug Administration commissioner. Makary is a British-born surgeon, professor, author, and medical commentator who practices surgical oncology and gastrointestinal laparoscopic surgery at the Johns Hopkins Hospital. He was considered a Covid contrarian, in that he opposed Covid vaccine mandates.

Dr. Janette Nesheiwat was named Surgeon General. Dr. Nesheiwat is a double board-certified medical doctor, a Fox News contributor and is medical director at CityMD, a chain of urgent care centers in New York and New Jersey.

Alex Wong was named assistant to the president and principal deputy national security advisor. He was a first-term Trump alum and is a senior fellow at the Hudson Institute.

Dr. Sebastian Gorka was named deputy assistant to the president and senior director for counterterrorism. He is an alum of Trump’s first term. Gorka is a British-Hungarian-American political commentator affiliated with Salem Radio Network and NewsMax TV.

Former Congressman Dr. Dave Weldon was nominated to serve as director of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. In addition to being a medical doctor for 40 years, he is an Army veteran.

Russell Vought, Trump’s former OMB director, returns for second term; has Alaska connection

Donald Trump has named Russell Vought of Virginia as the next director of the Office of Management and Budget.

“He did an excellent job serving in this role in my First Term – We cut four Regulations for every new Regulation, and it was a Great Success! Russ graduated with a B.A. from Wheaton College, and received his J.D. from the Washington University School of Law. Russ has spent many years working in Public Policy in Washington, D.C., and is an aggressive cost cutter and deregulator who will help us implement our America First Agenda across all Agencies,” Trump said.

And Vought knows the Deep State and weaponized government, and will help Trump dismantle the massive and crippling bureaucracy, which voters gave him a mandate to do.

Vought was married to Mary Vought, former aide to then-Rep.Mike Pence and Michele Bachmann, who was hired by Gov. Mike Dunleavy as a communications consultant. Mary Vought grew up in Alaska and attended Colony Middle School in Palmer. The couple has divorced.

Legacy media has tried to paint him as an architect of Project 2025, a plan to reduce the size of government and end its crushing impact on the lives of Americans.

Alexander Dolitsky: Explaining socialism vs. social programs

BY ALEXANDER DOLITSKY

Explaining Socialism vs. Social Programs

Nikita Khrushchev was first secretary of the Communist Party (Politburo) of the Soviet Union from 1953 to 1964; and chairman of the Council of Ministers from 1958 to 1964. 

In the early 1960s, on various occasions, he formally proclaimed that in 20 years, by the early 1980s, the Soviet Union would transition from Socialist socio-economic formation toward a better life under Communist socio-economic formation. In fact, there was a “hope in the air” in the former Soviet Union for a better life under communism; but it ended up being only the “totalitarian socialist regime in the air.”

Socio-economic formation is a theory that describes how social development is driven by material life and social being, rather than human consciousness and moral values. It is a Marxist concept that is considered a cornerstone of the materialist conception of history — historical materialism. The theory is based on the idea that the structure of a society is made up of three fundamental socio-economic factors: productive forces, relations of production, and superstructure. 

Karl Marx used the term “socio-economic formation” in his analysis of society’s economic and political development. He used it as an alternative to “mode of production” to describe the totality of social relations that define a society at a given historic time. 

Although Marx did not formulate a complete theory of socio-economic formations, Soviet historians and political scientists generalized his statements to conclude that he distinguished five socio-economic formations, namely: Prehistory—hunter-gatherers society; Slavery—slaves and masters; Feudalism—peasants and landlords; Capitalism—proletariat (workers) and capitalists; and Communism—all groups of people are socially equal and free from exploitation.

Vladimir Lenin, a Russian revolutionary and political theorist, was the founder and first head of government of Soviet Russia from 1917 until 1922, and of the Soviet Union from 1922 until his death in 1924. Lenin was a loyal student and committed follower of Marxist teaching.

According to classical Marxism-Leninism, socialism is a transitional social state between the overthrow of capitalism and the realization of communism as the last and victorious socio-economic stage of mankind. In short, theoretically, socialism is the first stage of the worldwide transition to communism.

Marxist-Leninist doctrine stipulates that Socialism is an economic and political philosophy, encompassing diverse economic and social systems characterized by social ownership of the means of production, as opposed to private ownership. It describes the economic, political, and social theories and movements associated with the implementation of such systems.

In short, Socialism is an economic system in which major industries are owned by workers rather than by private businesses. It is different from capitalism, where private actors, like business owners and shareholders, can own the means of production.

After graduating from high school at the age of 17, I worked as a layout in the ship-building yard in Kiev for two years, and then for five years in education and academic systems prior to my departure from the Soviet Union to the West in 1977.

Frankly, I don’t recall owning anything in the Soviet Union except for my books and personal possessions. But I do recall a remarkable inefficiency of the Soviet Socialist economic system, including food shortages, long waiting lines to acquire material goods and services, intellectual censorship, ideological indoctrination in the education system, isolation from the West, only one legitimate political party—Communist Party, rejection of world religions, including Judeo-Christian teaching and values, extreme antisemitism, and a remarkable bureaucratic corruption.

It is imperative to clearly distinguish socialism, as a socio-economic stage, from social programs that are intended to provide essential assistance to the public. The United States has many major social programs, including:

  • Social Security: Pays benefits to retired people and others who are unable to work due to disability
  • Unemployment: Helps replace lost wages for eligible workers who are unemployed 
  • Medicare: Provides health insurance coverage to people over 65 and eligible individuals with disabilities 
  • Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP): Also known as food stamps 
  • Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and Children (WIC): Helps with food 
  • Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (TANF): A welfare program 
  • Medicaid: A health insurance program for underemployed 
  • Earned Income Tax Credit (EITC): A refundable tax credit that subsidizes pretax income for low-earning households 
  • Housing assistance: Includes rental and buyer assistance programs, emergency housing, and eviction prevention 
  • Utility bills: Helps with phone, internet, and energy bills 
  • Old-Age, Survivors, and Disability Insurance (OASDI)
  • Workers’ Compensation
  • Temporary Disability Insurance
  • Veterans’ Benefits
  • Government Employee Retirement Systems
  • Railroad Retirement 
  • Supplemental Security Income (SSI)
  • General Assistance (GA)

Considering the short history of our nation, these social programs were developed and refined in a relatively short time, compared to other world civilizations.

In my view, today’s Marxist-Leninist teaching of Socialism is no longer an ideological threat to our society; it must be interpreted in the historic context of the 19th and 20th centuries. In fact, Marxism-Leninism outlived its purpose and validity. However, the far-left neo-Marxism-Leninism of white privilege doctrine, critical race theory, DEI, systemic racism notion, Black Lives Matter, wokeism and ANTIFA are indeed a grave danger to the fabric and ultimate existence of our Constitutional Republic.

True, our American nation is not perfect. Today, there are many far-left neo-Marxist-Leninist flaws and diversions contaminating our democracy and traditional Judeo-Christian lifestyle. Nevertheless, Americans always determine to find the right course in protecting and perfecting Judeo-Christian values of our Constitutional Republic.

Alexander B. Dolitsky was born and raised in Kiev in the former Soviet Union. He received an M.A. in history from Kiev Pedagogical Institute, Ukraine, in 1976; an M.A. in anthropology and archaeology from Brown University in 1983; and was enroled in the Ph.D. program in Anthropology at Bryn Mawr College from 1983 to 1985, where he was also a lecturer in the Russian Center. In the U.S.S.R., he was a social studies teacher for three years, and an archaeologist for five years for the Ukranian Academy of Sciences. In 1978, he settled in the United States. Dolitsky visited Alaska for the first time in 1981, while conducting field research for graduate school at Brown. He lived first in Sitka in 1985 and then settled in Juneau in 1986. From 1985 to 1987, he was a U.S. Forest Service archaeologist and social scientist. He was an Adjunct Assistant Professor of Russian Studies at the University of Alaska Southeast from 1985 to 1999; Social Studies Instructor at the Alyeska Central School, Alaska Department of Education from 1988 to 2006; and has been the Director of the Alaska-Siberia Research Center (see www.aksrc.homestead.com) from 1990 to present. He has conducted about 30 field studies in various areas of the former Soviet Union (including Siberia), Central Asia, South America, Eastern Europe and the United States (including Alaska). Dolitsky has been a lecturer on the World Discoverer, Spirit of Oceanus, and Clipper Odyssey vessels in the Arctic and sub-Arctic regions. He was the Project Manager for the WWII Alaska-Siberia Lend Lease Memorial, which was erected in Fairbanks in 2006. He has published extensively in the fields of anthropology, history, archaeology, and ethnography. His more recent publications include Fairy Tales and Myths of the Bering Strait Chukchi, Ancient Tales of Kamchatka; Tales and Legends of the Yupik Eskimos of Siberia; Old Russia in Modern America: Russian Old Believers in Alaska; Allies in Wartime: The Alaska-Siberia Airway During WWII; Spirit of the Siberian Tiger: Folktales of the Russian Far East; Living Wisdom of the Far North: Tales and Legends from Chukotka and Alaska; Pipeline to Russia; The Alaska-Siberia Air Route in WWII; and Old Russia in Modern America: Living Traditions of the Russian Old Believers; Ancient Tales of Chukotka, and Ancient Tales of Kamchatka.

Listicle: Fun facts about Alaska’s 2024 election

Number of legislative races that went into ranked-choice voting tabulation: 8

Number of legislators elected who are not with a formal party (but are undeclared Democrats): 5

First woman with a “chatoo” chin tattoo elected to the Alaska Legislature: Robyn Burke of District 40, Utqiagvik, seen above in her campaign photo.

Senate race with most write-in votes: Senate Seat B. Although Sen. Jesse Kiehl, a Democrat, was unopposed and won with 96% of the vote, there were 561 write-in votes in that race, or 3.49% of votes cast.

House race with the most write-in votes: House District 24. Nearly tied — Rep. George Rauscher, a Republican from House District 29, was unopposed and got 95.55% of the vote, but 363 voters wrote in a name, about 4.45%. Rep. Zack Fields, a Democrat from House District 17 was unopposed and won 93.56% of the vote for his reelection, but 361 voters wrote in a name, a higher percentage of about 6.44%.

Senate district with the highest voter turnout: Senate District L, Eagle River, 62.69%

Senate district with the lowest voter turnout: Senate District T, Northwest and Arctic region, 38.71%

Number of Alaska Natives or American Indigenous now in the Legislature: 9 — Jubilee Underwood, (Cherokee), Mike Cronk, Donny Olson, Lyman Hoffman, Robyn Burke, Nellie Jimmie, Bryce Edgmon, Neal Foster, Maxine Dibert.

Number of former legislator who were elected this year: 3 — Mia Costello, Chuck Kopp, David Nelson, all elected to the House.

The most number of votes won in a race where there was opposition: Rep. Alyse Galvin of Anchorage, 77.6%

Women rule: This is the first time that the Alaska House has had a majority of women members. No more victim card?

Who did the best in their own hometown? Darren Deacon got 90% of the vote for House District 37 in his hometown of Lower Kalskag, where people know him best. He ended up losing to Rep. Bryce Edgmon, the incumbent.

The Trumpiest precincts in Alaska: Small precinct Dot Lake in District 36, where over 91.8% of the vote went for Trump. Large precinct Delta, with 87% for Trump.

The precincts that went most heavy for Harris: Small precinct Allakaket in District 36, where 92.1% voted for Kamala Harris. Large precinct Downtown Juneau No. 2, with 77.83% for Harris.

Huge swing: Margin of victory for Mary Peltola in last election was 10; this time she lost by 3, so this was a 13% swing into the loss column.

David and Goliath: $11 million to $2 million were the campaign fundraising totals by Rep. Mary Peltola and challenger Nick Begich in the congressional race.

Flips: Alaska’s was only one of five seats to flip from Democrat to Republican nationwide out of over 200 Democrat-held seats.

Generational: When Nick Begich 1 went to Congress, his son, Nick Begich II, was 12. When Nick Begich III goes to Congress, his son Nick Begich IV will be 12.

Adam Ellwanger: An education speech we would welcome from the new secretary

By ADAM ELLWANGER

Imagine these words as the first speech delivered by the incoming Secretary of Education.

Today, I am here to deliver bitter medicine: American education has failed. Teachers and parents, administrators and government—and even students—all bear some responsibility.

The most common explanations for our educational crisis are inadequate funding, overuse of standardized testing, and systemic prejudice. They are false.

  • Our schools do not lack funding—no country spends more on public education.
  • The poor results of standardized tests indicate our failures; they are not the cause.
  • Our schools are not prejudiced—the most aggressive education reforms since 1955 directly aimed to eliminate systemic discrimination.

For decades, we ignored signs of trouble, but the COVID-19 pandemic revealed the depth of our challenges. The problems are so pervasive and complex that there is no quick fix. We cannot merely repair; we must rebuild.

Since 2020, American families have struggled mightily. The declining quality of education prompted affluent families to opt out of public schools, leaving middle- and working-class families with diminished resources and influence to push for reform. States’ refusal to enact school choice reforms widened the wealth gap and limited generational mobility.

But lower- and middle-class families bear some responsibility, too. The rise of single-parent households, less common among affluent families, has been catastrophic. When the only adult in the home works up to 60 hours a week to make ends meet, there is little time for homework help, PTA meetings, or engaging with school officials. Even in households with two working parents, time and energy are often in short supply.

Teachers, for their part, have good reason to despair. Despite the monumental importance of their work, many are underpaid. They face administrators who value standardized test scores above all else. Meanwhile, declining standards for decorum and discipline, often justified in the name of “social justice,” have made schools unsafe for both teachers and students. Violence and insubordination create an environment unfit for serious learning. Some parents treat schools as daycare centers or demand good grades for minimal effort. Worse, parents of disruptive students often refuse to ensure their children do not rob others of the opportunity to learn.

Yet teachers, too, have failed. They inflate grades to keep their jobs but do no favors for students unprepared for future challenges. This, in turn, lowers the quality of education for students ready for more advanced work, driving gifted students out of public schools.

Another harsh truth is that many teachers are unprepared for the job. The education system has failed for so long that many teachers have never mastered the material they are supposed to teach. Colleges steer future educators toward “education” majors, where coursework focuses more on leftist “social justice” ideology than on subject mastery. Some graduates believe their mission is to “dismantle” an “unjust” society by creating anti-American activists.

When these activist-teachers enter classrooms, they often abandon their duty to transmit America’s culture, knowledge, and values. Instead, they teach students to disdain their nation, its people, its past, and its way of life. This undermines social cohesion and deprives disadvantaged students of the tools they need to succeed.

Outdated curricula exacerbate these issues. Most schools still use models from the late 20th century, failing to address how computing, the internet, and artificial intelligence have transformed how we read, write, and learn. Even in innovative schools, teachers often struggle to balance the needs of non-native English speakers with those of native speakers, diluting the educational experience for the latter.

Our colleges and universities are also broken. Admitting underprepared students has lowered academic standards nationwide. General education curricula often assume a need for remediation, leaving motivated students without the challenge or preparation they deserve.

Government-run financial aid has inflated tuition costs while diminishing the value of college degrees. Proposals to cancel student debt signal to universities that they can continue raising prices without consequence, encouraging predatory admission policies that saddle students with unmanageable debt.

How do we revitalize American education?

Nothing short of an academic Sputnik will suffice. Just as Sputnik spurred the urgency that sent Americans to the moon, we need a bold initiative to revolutionize education:

  • We will create K-12 curricula prioritizing history, civics, and an understanding of our government.
  • We will eliminate curricula that divide Americans by race, class, religion, sex, or sexual identity.
  • We will implement school choice nationwide.
  • We will end federal student loan programs, allowing private lenders to evaluate borrowers’ ability to repay. Conditional lending will force colleges to lower tuition and revise admissions and program offerings.
  • We will expand vocational training and enhance opportunities for gifted students.
  • We will raise teacher credentialing standards to ensure advanced subject knowledge.
  • We will enforce decorum and discipline in schools. Uniforms will unify student bodies, and measures like suspension and expulsion will ensure classrooms are conducive to learning.
  • We will revise college accreditation standards to reflect post-graduation success and employment metrics.
  • We will penalize public colleges and universities that engage in discriminatory admissions practices.

And that is just the beginning.

The destiny of our nation depends on education. The effort to revitalize our schools must be as bold as our aspirations. Together, we will bring American education into the 21st century. Together, we will make American education great again.

This article was originally published by RealClearEducation and made available via RealClearWire.

Pete Hoekstra nominated as ambassador to Canada

Former Ambassador and Congressman Pete Hoekstra has been nominated as the next U.S. ambassador to Canada.

He represented Michigan’s 2nd District in Congress for nearly 20 years, where he was chairman of the House Intelligence Committee. This year, he was elected chairman of the Michigan Republican Party.

“I overhauled the disastrous NAFTA Agreement, the worst Trade Deal in the History of the United States, which was switched to the USMCA (Mexico/Canada), which no one thought could be done. We brought Trade with Mexico and Canada to a level playing field for our wonderful Farmers and Working Families. In my Second Term, Pete will help me once again put AMERICA FIRST. He did an outstanding job as United States Ambassador to the Netherlands during our first four years, and I am confident that he will continue to represent our Country well in this new role. Thank you, Pete!” Trump wrote.

Hoekstra was born in the Netherlands and moved to the United States as a child. He was ambassador to the Netherlands from 2018 through Jan. 2021.

Bipartisan-Democrat caucus says it has the votes to control State House in 2025

Following the count by Alaska’s Division of Elections, the House Majority Coalition announced it will take over leadership of the House and will work on exploding budgets for defined benefits for public employees.

The group has begun work on priorities of education, energy, retirement reform, and balanced budgets.

“We have a strong team with a bipartisan leadership, rural and urban representation, and are getting to work now to prepare for the session starting in January,” said Rep. Bryce Edgmon, who identified himself as “Speaker.” In fact, Rep. Cathy Tilton is still the speaker until the House gavels in on Jan. 21.

Edgmon was a Democrat but years ago reregistered as an undeclared candidate, which allows him to pretend he is not a Democrat and move back and forth with the power swings. From Dillingham, he was speaker from 2019-2021.

“Numerous Republican members have been in discussion about joining the caucus, and the House Majority welcomes all members who are committed to balanced budgets, education, energy, and retirement reform,” the press release from the caucus says.

It appears the House will be run by a Democrat and undeclared majority, much like the Senate, with a few Republican peeling off from the minority to join the caucus.

With both the House and Senate organizing as bipartisan caucuses with majority-Democrat members, Gov. Mike Dunleavy will have a challenge on his hands and may find it hard to get his legislation passed. He will likely be presented with a new defined benefits package for some state workers, and he may not have the votes to sustain a veto.

The next legislative session starts on Jan. 21 and runs through May 21.