Thursday, August 28, 2025
Home Blog Page 271

Peltola demands more foreign workers in Alaska, while blasting Nick Begich for his international businesses

Ads running for Mary Peltola’s campaign harp constantly about how Republican candidate Nick Begich, who has specialized in start-up businesses in the private sector, owns a company that hired IT workers in India.

But Peltola is now on record stating that Alaska needs more foreign workers pumped into in the state because there are not enough people in Alaska to do the work.

Alaska has seen its population drop in recent years by thousands, and its unemployment rate is currently 4.5%, with about 16,700 people considered unemployed.

Speaking to a “summit” of Alaska Natives convened by Peltola on the outmigration problem in Alaska, Peltola said, “Our challenge has been outmigration for over 10 years. In fact, we need J-1 visas like nobody’s business, because we need foreign people to come and help us fill our sectors.”

Her campaign criticizes Begich for finding highly skilled IT workers to perform extremely specialized application development tasks, but she wants low-skilled jobs in the fishing industry, which could be performed by residents without so much as a graduation equivalency diploma and the homeless population, to go to foreigners.

According to the Alaska Department of Labor, Alaska doesn’t need to import foreigners. “Every year thousands of people inquire about working and living in Alaska. Alaska has adequate numbers of qualified people to fill most jobs,” the department says on its website.

Nick Begich no longer employs any international workers. In the information technology sector, many jobs and tasks are now being replaced by artificial intelligence in what is a rapidly changing field.

The companies he has worked with and invested in in the United States were early-stage start ups, many of which went on to create hundreds, or in some cases thousands of U.S. jobs that would not have existed without a unique model developed by Begich, in which his team coached and mentored start up companies as they developed their technology. Two Harvard University case studies have been written about Begich’s unique business model and his model has been covered by the Wall Street Journal.

Peltola’s attack on Begich is message-tested by her campaign team. But she has now stepped in her own mess, by advocating to replace Alaska’s jobs with foreigners.

Earlier, Peltola stated that only those who have had a career in government should run for public office.

Alex Gimarc: Those ranked-choice voting ads are all bought and delivered by Outside dark money

The second round of pro-ranked choice voting ads rolled out last week. The ads exhort the listener to vote against the repeal or ranked-choice voting in November.  They trot out three arguments in support of their “no” vote:

  • RCV outlawed dark money
  • Repealing RCV removes the freedom of an open primary
  • The repeal effort is entirely the creation of party insiders and political elites

Let’s take a closer look:

The ad is backed by three entities: Unite America, Final Five Fund, and the Action Now Initiative. 

A look into the most recent IRS Form 990 submittals for the people funding the ads find that Unite America is located Denver.  It had revenues of $8.2 million in 2022.  None of the contributors are listed.  Final Five Fund is headquartered in Chicago.  It had revenues of just over $12 million in 2022.  None of its contributors are reported either.  Our final participant is the Action Now Institute, also from Chicago.  It had $388,000 revenue in 2021.  Like the others, no individual contributors were listed.

We see that all three non-profits backing RCV here in Alaska are Outside non-profits. They do not report their contributors, while piously running an ad claiming RCV outlawed dark money. 

If RCV outlawed dark money in Alaskan elections, why are these guys able to run their dark-money-funded ads defending RCV?

The second claim is that repealing RCV removes the freedom of an open primary. This is a return to the original pro-RCV campaign in 2020. There have always been a group of our neighbors who believe they have the right to select candidates for other political parties. But do they? A political party is a voluntary group of like-minded people who select their own representation. Once that process is complete, the parties attempt to get their choices approved by the larger electorate on election day (primary, general, run-off).

The original campaign to pass RCV concentrated on this point, and didn’t go so well, so the backers focus-grouped their argument and pivoted to the promised ban on dark money in Alaskan elections, something I just demonstrated is a complete lie.

Finaly, the ad pounds the notion that all of this is something out of party insiders, the political elites. The fact of the matter is that the repeal was entirely a grassroots effort, fought at every turn by Team Lisa Murkowski and her lawfare proxies. 

In this case, it is the political elite, Team Lisa that is in full-throated support of RCV. They wrote it. They figured out how to pass it. And they want to retain it at all costs because it benefits their political future.

If RCV is such a good thing, why do its supporters believe they need to continue to lie about it and hide their funding from the general public?  We are fast approaching the point with this crowd that the only thing we need to know that proves they are lying is that their lips are moving.  

Rather than damaging the repeal effort, every time the pro-RCV side runs an ad like this, they strengthen the case in support of a repeal.  

Alex Gimarc lives in Anchorage since retiring from the military in 1997. His interests include science and technology, environment, energy, economics, military affairs, fishing and disabilities policies. His weekly column “Interesting Items” is a summary of news stories with substantive Alaska-themed topics. He was a small business owner and Information Technology professional.

Alaska Democrats’ conspiracy-theory lawsuit in elections case reassigned to new judge

A lawsuit brought by the Alaska Democratic Party against the Division of Elections to stop the general election ballot from being printed until it conforms to the party’s demands has been reassigned to a new judge and oral arguments are set for Monday at 9 a.m.

Originally, the case was assigned to Superior Court Judge Adolf Zeman, but on Thursday it was administratively reassigned to Judge Ian Wheeles.

It appears that Zeman, who is on the ballot for judicial retention in November, wanted off the case, since he is already in hot water with Republicans over his ruling earlier this year that said that the state’s correspondence schools were unconstitutional, a ruling that was overturned by the Alaska Supreme Court.

Many Republicans plan to vote against Zeman’s retention, and no matter which way he would rule on this lawsuit from the Democrats, it could cost him his job by either further infuriating Republicans or giving Democrats a reason to not retain him.

Judge Wheeles also serves in the Third Judicial District in Anchorage, where he has lived his whole life. Wheeles graduated from Dimond High School, played baseball at Illinois Tech, completed his undergraduate degree at the University of Alaska Anchorage and earned his law degree at the University of Idaho. He practiced criminal defense, family law, and was appointed by Gov. Mike Dunleavy in 2022 to serve on the court.

The case against the Division of Elections’ certification of the ballot is on a fast-track in the courts since the election is in just 60 days and ballots need to be mailed to overseas voters within two weeks. The State has submitted its brief on Friday morning, and the Democrats will file their brief later Friday.

The original lawsuit by the Democrats can be seen here:

The gist of the case is that the Alaska Democratic Party is demanding that the name of Democrat candidate Eric Hafner be removed from the congressional portion of the November ballot. The Democrats claim that since he finished in the open primary in sixth place, he cannot be moved up, even after the third and fourth-place finishers dropped out after the primary. They also claim that since he is a felon serving time in prison, he can’t possibly be an Alaska resident. They claim people might be confused and vote for Hafner and not rank Rep. Mary Peltola, the party’s endorsed candidate.

Hafner got onto the certified general election ballot because two who finished before him declined to continue and dropped before the Sept. 2 deadline. Nancy Dahlstrom and Matthew Salisbury, both Republicans, withdrew from contention to give Republican Nick Begich a better shot at winning the congressional seat in November.

The Democratic Party, in its lawsuit, claims it was a Republican conspiracy to move Hafner up into the fourth slot for the November ballot. Also moving up was John Wayne Howe of the Alaskan Independence Party.

The Democrats’ claim that since Hafner cannot live in Alaska if he wins election, he is ineligible to serve would be a post-election challenge, not something that could be challenged in advance of Nov. 5. Clearly, the Democrats are afraid that even a few hundred votes for Hafner could cost them the seat in Congress.

It’s a difficult set of arguments, since on the one hand, predicts that Hafner would not be granted a pardon by Joe Biden in order to help flip the U.S. House to Democrat control. Also, there are many who are serving in federal prisons around the country who are Alaska residents. Alaska voter registration laws allow those who “intend to return” to Alaska to maintain their voting rights if they don’t register in another state. Hafner could claim he intends to reside in Alaska.

Intention in residency is something the courts have recently considered in a similar Alaska lawsuit filed by Republican candidate Liz Vazquez against Democrat state Rep. Jennie Armstrong in 2022. Vazquez wanted to kick Armstrong off the ballot since, as a recent transplant to the state, Armstrong had clearly not lived in Alaska and or her district long enough to qualify to serve. The courts held the challenge for candidate eligibility expires 10 days after the filing deadline in June. The challenge was not timely in 2022 and Armstrong went on to win a seat representing the Turnagain neighborhood in West Anchorage.

Defending the Division of Elections and Director Carol Beecher in the current case are state attorneys Katherine Demarest and Thomas Flynn. Alaska Democrat election attorney Thomas Amodio and the Democrat law firm of Marc Elias in Washington D.C. are representing the Alaska Democratic Party.

Nick Begich’s campaign battle station opens in Anchorage

6

Sixty days before the November general election is over, Republican congressional candidate Nick Begich, who is running to unseat Democrat Rep. Mary Peltola, has a new team headquarters. The resources are rolling in, along with positive polling numbers, and a surge of enthusiasm from Alaskans.

The Begich “battle station” will have its open house on Saturday, Sept. 7 from 11 a.m. to 2 p.m. The headquarters is located at 207 E. Northern Lights Blvd. Suite 111, with entry on the west side of the building.

Campaigns across the state will move into high gear now that the primary has been certified by the Division of Elections.

Hunter Biden changes plea in tax evasion case

Hunter Biden, business partner with his father President Joe Biden, is attempting to make a no-contest plea to avoid his tax evasion case going to trial in California.

An Alford plea, as it’s know, would mean he would not admit he did anything illegal, but would acknowledge enough evidence has been presented to convict him.

His attorneys were in court in Los Angeles Thursday morning making the case to the court. Prosecutors objected because federal courts do not accept these Alford pleas. The judge recessed the proceedings to consider the decision.

He is supposed to face trial in California on charges he avoided paying $1.4 million in taxes even as he spent plenty of money on an extravagant lifestyle.

Update: The judge did not accept the plea and Biden has now pleaded guilty to avoid trial.

In June, Hunter was found guilty by a Delaware jury of making false statements while purchasing a firearm, unlawful possession of a firearm, and making other false statements regarding information kept by federally licensed firearms dealers. 

Those prior charges stem from his use of and alleged addiction to illegal drugs at the time he was buying a Colt Cobra .38-caliber on Oct. 12, 2018, and lying about his drug use on purchasing forms. Federal law bans users of illegal drugs from possessing firearms.

New poll shows Begich pulling neck-and-neck with Peltola

A new poll conducted by the National Republican Congressional Committee shows that Rep. Mary Peltola and Republican Nick Begich are in a statistical tie, with Peltola leading 45-45%, and a margin of error of 4.86%.

The poll was conducted after Republican Nancy Dahlstrom dropped from the race for Congress two weeks ago. The polling company, Cygnal, surveyed 400 likely general election voters from all political stripes.

This is the first poll that has been released since the Aug. 20 primary.

The Cygnal survey shows Alaska’s congressional race to be one of the most competitive in the country. While Begich has been outspent by Peltola by more than 10-to-1, he has outworked her and the poll shows he has a favorability rating of +10. Some 47% are favorable to Begich and 37% are unfavorable.

Peltola has a 51% favorable and 43% unfavorable rating.

When people are given reasons to support Begich or to not support Peltola, the numbers were overwhelming.

“We are not a purple state. Alaskans bleed red. Republicans have got to do a better job at getting out their message and executing campaign strategy, because the electorate is no-doubt with us on the issues,” said Bernadette Wilson, owner of Moneyball Strategies and senior advisor to the Nick Begich for Congress campaign.

Telling in this calculus is that the Peltola campaign has not released any polling data for months.

Complicating things for Peltola is that her party is now suing to get another Democrat off the general election ballot. Eric Hafner, a prisoner serving time for bomb threats and other threats, is a Democrat who wants to represent Alaska, and he could shave hundreds of votes off of Peltola.

In order to rig the elections, the Alaska Democratic Party has hired the nation’s top Democrat election lawyer, Marc Elias, and has sued the Division of Elections to get Hafner off the ballot and give their preferred Democrat a better chance. This could backfire on Peltola if voters see that she and her party are trying to misuse their ranked-choice voting system that they support by litigating against other candidates. It’s a bad look for the Democrats in Alaska and shows how desperate.

Breaking: Alaska Democrats sue to force their Democrat felon off the Alaska ballot in November

The Alaska Democratic Party is steaming mad that a Democrat, who is also a felon serving time in a federal penitentiary in New York, is on the final-four ballot for Alaska’s congressional seat in November. They are suing the Division of Elections to get him off the ballot so Mary Peltola can win.

Open primaries and ranked-choice voting was designed by liberals to ensure more Republicans would be on the November ballots than Democrats and split the campaign donations, volunteers, and momentum of conservatives. But it just didn’t work out that way on the second election to use the new system.

“Congresswoman Mary Peltola won the August 20 primary election with a clear majority of the votes cast. The next three highest vote-getters were all Republicans. But as an apparent result of last-minute machinations at the expense of Alaska voters, two of those three Republican candidates dropped out, and Defendants [Division of Elections] certified late Monday that they intended to place the fifth and sixth-place finishers on the general election ballot in their place,” the lawsuit says.

It goes on to say that the sixth-place finisher, Eric Hafner, the felon who has made violent threats against political figures, judges, and others, cannot and should not be on the ballot.

“Alaska law does not provide for the inclusion of the sixth-place primary finisher on the general election ballot under any circumstances. But if it did allow for such inclusion, Mr. Hafner would need to be replaced by the seventh-place finisher: Mr. Hafner is disqualified from representing Alaska in Congress for two reasons. First, because he is not and cannot possibly become an inhabitant of Alaska—as the U.S. Constitution requires—while he is serving a federal prison sentence in New York until 2036. And second, because he failed to list his full residence address on his declaration of candidacy, as Alaska law requires,” the lawsuit says.

The Democrats have been promoting open primaries and ranked-choice voting method, with the top four finishers in the open primary going on to the November ballot.

Now, however, they want to revise the rules to fit their desire to get Peltola reelected. And the lawsuit alleges, without proof, that the withdrawal of both Republicans was orchestrated by the Alaska Republican Party.

“On information and belief, the withdrawals of Lieutenant Governor Dahlstrom and Mr. Salisbury were orchestrated by the Alaska Republican Party in an effort to ensure that only one Republican candidate appears on the general election ballot,” the lawsuit reads. Even if it was, there is nothing in law to prevent a political party from acting in a politically advantageous way. It’s how the Democratic Party operated to get Al Gross off the ballot in 2022, so Peltola could win for Congress.

The lawsuit’s “information and belief” is based on dark-money news organization reporting from the Alaska Beacon. But weakening the case is the fact that the Democrats did not sue over Hafner’s name being on the ballot for the primary. The party only was interested after Hafner made it to the general election ballot, where he may peel votes away from the Democrats’ incumbent.

In addition to Anchorage attorney Thomas Amodio representing the Alaska Democratic Party, the Elias Law Group of Washington, D.C. is representing the plaintiff. David R. Fox is a partner at the law group that signed off on the lawsuit. He specializes in ballot access issues for the group. The firm was a key player in the Russia hoax, and Marc Elias was the man who paid Fusion GPS for the Steele dossier when he was at Perkins Coie. He is the biggest “lawfare” attorney the Democrats have nationally. Elias represented Sen. Bob Menendez and Hunter Biden’s business entities.

According to the Washington Examiner, Elias is using “fringe” theories to sow 2024 election chaos.

This story will be updated. Check back.

Alaska’s open primary, ranked-choice voting system: So slick it put a felon on Nov. 5 ballot for Congress

The open primary, ranked-choice general election has delivered for Alaska: Thanks to the new system, Eric Hafner is one of two Democrats who will appear on the November general election ballot for Alaska’s congressional seat.

Twelve people were on the primary election ballot. The top four are supposed to appear on the general election ballot.

But Hafner came in sixth, even though his address is a storage unit in South Dakota.

His actual residence is a federal prison where he is serving 20 years for making serious bomb threats and other murder threats, extortion, and bribery. The 467 votes for him from Alaskans may have simply been Democrats protesting the waffling and weak performance of Democrat Rep. Mary Peltola, who holds the seat for Alaska. And yet, even as the fifth-place candidate, he will still be on the November top-four ballot.

Alaskans voted in this system in 2020, persuaded by lawyers and operatives supporting Sen. Lisa Murkowski, who was no longer a viable candidate for the Republicans’ semi-open primary. They made it so that in 2022, she would not have to compete against a Republican to advance — she could advance with the help of Democrats.

The new election method, not used in any other state, was pushed and paid for by dark money from liberal billionaires outside Alaska, and the messaging was that better-quality candidates would be the result of the ballot measure that they bought and paid for.

With Alaska’s new system being used for the second time, the top four vote getters in the primary this year also proceed to the November ballot, regardless of party.

But with third-place Republican Nancy Dahlstrom and fourth-place Republican Matthew Salisbury dropping after the primary, that means the fifth- and sixth-place vote getters will appear on the general election ballot.

Hafner, whose candidate bio for the Alaska Division of Elections can be found here, got less than half a percent of the vote, and AIP candidate John Wayne Howe squeaked out a little more than half a percent, yet both now will advance. Together, they represent 1,088 votes of the 108,906 ballots cast — about 1% between them.

This means Peltola, who won over 50% of the vote in the primary, could see votes peeled off by Hafner, who is slightly to her left politically.

The Alaska Democrats are on record supporting this system of voting and are working to preserve it as Alaskans are trying to repeal it in November. Again, the same dark money is coming into the state to protect it and the Democrats who support it.

The U.S. Constitution only says congressional candidates must be at least 25, and must a U.S. citizen for seven years. If elected, the candidate must then be a resident of that state after the general election. This is the same way that Hillary Clinton became a U.S. senator for New York, even though she was not a resident when she ran. (Article 1, Section 2).

Alaska often sees people from outside the state file for federal office. But being a candidate from prison outside the state and advancing is a new twist, brought to Alaska by the open primary, ranked-choice general voting scheme.

Hafner has a long history of political activism. Between July 2016 and May 2018, while residing in the Mariana Islands to escape the long arm of the law, Hafner made threats to numerous individuals located in and around Monmouth County, N.J. and elsewhere. According to the Department of Justice, the victims were elected officials, judges, police officers, attorneys, and their families. Hafner sought to extort $350,000 from some of his victims. Hafner also made false bomb threats to an elected official’s office, a county courthouse, a police department, two law firms, and a business.

In 2018, Hafner ran for Congress against Democrat Rep. Earl Blumenauer of Oregon’s 3rd congressional district, and in 2016, he sought the nomination to represent Hawaii’s 2nd congressional district, and won 44% of the vote. He called himself a Hawaiian nationalist and an advocate for marijuana and criminal law reforms. He did not live in either of those localities when he ran for Congress. He was essentially homeless in 2018, he reported then, as he was trying to evade arrest.

Read about the bomb threat case at the Department of Justice at this link.

Alaska judge says it’s OK for midwives to kill unborn

63

Certified midwives, known for helping bring children into the families of Alaska, are now allowed to suction them into the fresh air for the express purpose of destroying them.

An Anchorage Superior Court judge has ruled that not only can doctors perform abortions in the state, licensed “advanced practice clinicians” can give out abortion-inducing pills and suction out living unborn children from mothers’ wombs. The decision is in advance of Garton’s decision in an underlying case brought in 2019 by Planned Parenthood of the Great Northwest, Hawaii, Alaska, Indiana, Kentucky.

The trial took place in November, when Planned Parenthood argued that physician assistants, nurse practitioners, and certified nurse midwives are entitled to provide both medication and “aspiration” or suction abortion, even though it is “beyond the scope of their practice.”

The pro-abortion group says that the ban is the only law in Alaska that targets the type of care an advanced practice clinician can provide. The claim is not factual; there are many sideboards put on the care that advanced practitioners can perform.

Planned Parenthood asserts that the law violates Alaskans’ fundamental right to abortion and the state constitution’s equal protection guarantee. Alaska has one of the most lenient abortion standards in the country, allowing the practice all the way up to the moment of birth.

Judge Josie Garton said that the group is likely to succeed in its argument that the law curbing the practice of abortion to doctors only is unconstitutional. She also said that the clinicians have a right to perform abortions.

Alaska’s Supreme Court has long been pro-abortion, believing it is a privacy matter, and Garton has now signaled that her decision on the underlying case will also be pro-abortion.

Witnesses in the trial testified that that the law delays access to abortion without any medical benefit and causes unique harm to rural Alaskans and those “experiencing intimate partner violence.”

“Every person in Alaska deserves the freedom to seek abortion from trusted health care providers in their own community,” said Rebecca Gibron, CEO of Planned Parenthood Great Northwest, Hawai’i, Alaska, Indiana, Kentucky (PPGNHAIK) in November“Allowing advanced practice clinicians to provide abortion will ensure that patients are able to better access the time-sensitive care they need. We are hopeful that this court will again rule in favor of reproductive freedom and permanently block this outdated and medically unnecessary restriction.”