Saturday, November 15, 2025
Home Blog Page 1656

Lawsuits, liens, and asset filings: Alice Rogoff bankruptcy continues

5

 

 

LEGAL FILINGS POUR IN

The lawsuits and liens are flying around bankrupt publisher Alice Rogoff and the Alaska Dispatch News.

The company that owns the building where two printing presses of the Dispatch are lying dormant are now suing Dispatch owner Alice Rogoff because her contractors, which she has not paid, have put a lien on the building.

Arctic Partners, the owner of the property at 59th and Arctic Blvd, says Rogoff signed a 10-year lease on Nov. 1, 2016, for $43,577 per month, plus all utilities, costs and expenses associated with the lease. She hasn’t paid her rent for months.

In other court filings, it appears Rogoff owes over $21.4 million to various creditors, split about even between secured creditors like Northrim Bank, and unsecured creditors like M&M Wiring. The court bankruptcy trustee now believes Rogoff will not make good on her debts, and also writes of the confusion surrounding who is responsible for what.

Rogoff’s list of business assets have been filed with the court, which include more than $12 million in personal property and no real property. The newspaper has nearly $1 million owed to it in accounts receivable.

At the 5900 Arctic Blvd property, Rogoff left unfinished the installation of the two presses.

With M&M Wiring now putting a lien on Arctic Partners’ property because of $508,000 in construction costs and damages, and with other companies now getting lawyered up, the lawsuits are starting to pile up.

The company gave Rogoff notice in July that she was in default, but she ignored the notice, and then transferred interest in some of her personal property in order to hinder, delay, or defraud Arctic Partners, the landlord asserts.

Arctic Partners is saying Rogoff is personally liable. That’s what the other creditors are trying to do, too, because she does have personal assets that have not been revealed to the court.

ROGOFF STILL IN CONTROL

The Binkley Company was given the title “publisher” of the newspaper at the time the Dispatch went into Chapter 11 bankruptcy. But Rogoff has not allowed the company to make any substantive changes that would stopped the hemorrhaging. No one has been laid off.

Even Rogoff’s executive vice president Margy Johnson has been kept on staff at the insistence of Rogoff, even though Jerry Grilly has been hired by the Binkley Company to run the operation. Grilly was once the publisher of the Anchorage Daily News, the former name of the Dispatch. But his hands appear to be tied while the bankruptcy proceeding continues, because Rogoff has not relinquished her authority.

ENTIRE OPERATION HEADING TOWARD CHAPTER 7

As the Dispatch heads for the auction block on Sept. 11, a bankruptcy trustee is recommending the case be converted to Chapter 7 bankruptcy, since there is so little likelihood that Rogoff will make good on her debts.

In an Aug. 30 filing, Attorney Kathryn Perkins in the U.S. Trustee Office says Rogoff “will face no reasonable likelihood of rehabilitation.” In other words, she’ll essentially skip out on her debts, with her personal assets untouched.

Chapter 7 bankruptcy would mean whatever remaining assets there are after the sale of the paper would be sold off and payments would be made to creditors.

Rogoff  has made a deal with the Binkley Company, but she is also believed to be in private side discussions with a group formed by Mark Begich and liberal billionaire Tom Steyer to make a bid on the newspaper at the next hearing, which is on Sept. 11. A third bidder has been rumored to be circling the newspaper as well.

The Binkley Company has loaned the newspaper up to $1 million to keep it alive until the sale. That is also the amount the Binkley Company is paying for the paper, which means nothing will be left for Rogoff’s creditors.

If the Binkley Company is not successful as a bidder, the buyer will have to pay off the $1 million loan at closing.

Special session to be held Oct. 23

There will be a fourth special session  of the Legislature Oct. 23 and it will deal with taxes, according to a memo from Governor Walker’s legislative director.

Darwin Peterson contacted all 60 legislators with this note:

Dear Legislators,

I hope you’re all having an enjoyable interim and getting lots of quality family time. There has been a lot of talk about a special session in October. It has been and remains the Governor’s intent to call the Legislature into a special session this fall on the subject of revenue. The Governor has talked to both the Senate President and the Speaker about timing for a special session and has settled on Monday, October 23rd as the best time to convene the Legislature in Juneau for the 4th special session. An official proclamation will be forthcoming, but I wanted to give you all as much notice as possible.”

House Minority leader Charisse Millett responded: “I appreciate  the Governor giving us a long lead time for his 4th special session call, however, if the Governor is advocating for new or increased taxes on Alaskans, and Alaska businesses. I believe the 4th special session will not have a positive outcome. We still need to have a honest conversation about the size of government, and continue to make smart reductions, and eliminate wasteful spending before reaching in Alaskans wallets.”

The session is scheduled for immediately following the Alaska Federation of Natives annual convention in Anchorage, which ends Oct. 21.

The governor is likely to bring a sales tax proposal to the Legislature since his income tax proposal failed during regular and special sessions earlier this year.

House Majority Leader Bryce Edgmon welcomed the opportunity to work on taxes:

“The facts are that low oil prices are likely for the foreseeable future and we currently have less than one year’s worth of savings to fund essential state services like public education and public safety. That means it is time for all of us to put aside politics and come together to find a sustainable fiscal solution for Alaska,” the Democrat from Dillingham said. “The members of the Alaska House Majority Coalition are prepared to go back to work to finish what we started earlier this year when we passed a full fiscal plan that included new revenue to fill the budget gap. I am concerned that if action is not taken this fall the politics that inevitably spring up during an election year will get in the way of real and comprehensive fiscal solutions next year.”

However, there are billions of dollars in reserves that could hold the state for years to come if the governor would trim the budget. He has been unwilling to make those cuts and has sought higher taxes since taking office in 2014.

 

Governor rejects Exxon’s Point Thomson plan of development

0

EXPANSION PLANS TOO VAGUE, ADMINISTRATION SAYS

In a six-page letter of dense legalese posted somewhere on the Division of Oil and Gas web site, the Walker Administration has rejected ExxonMobil’s expansion plan to develop gas at Point Thomson. The division has done so without noticing either the company or the public.

Must Read Alaska got ahold of the letter this morning. It demands Exxon make much more specific commitments to produce gas from the leases it has.

The governor ordered Exxon to go back to the drawing board and submit a revised plan by Oct. 13. It was a split decision: The initial production system that is under way is approved, but the Administration has nothing good to say about the expansion plan.

The move is in line with other approaches the Walker Administration has taken to companies operating in Alaska’s oil patch. But it also reveals an underlying old grievance he has against Exxon and a settlement that he once sued the state over. Exxon has always been a burr in Walker’s saddle.

The “Division … finds that the Expansion Project Planning POD is inconsistent with the Settlement Agreement and on that basis denies it,” the Administration wrote in a letter signed Aug. 29.

In a brief statement, the company said it was aware of the letter from the Department of Natural Resources, but had not reviewed it and was unable to comment. But the company also said “ExxonMobil has been, and will continue to be, in full compliance with the Pt. Thomson Settlement Agreement.”

The expansion plan covers increased production of condensate and shipment of gas to the Prudhoe Bay Unit.

With the Alaska LNG Project a pipe dream, ExxonMobil plans to reinject natural gas from its Point Thomson field into the Prudhoe Bay oil and gas pool, which would satisfy the 2012 settlement agreement with the Parnell Administration.

That particular agreement was fought in court by Gov. Walker when he was a private practice oil litigator. The case was never resolved before he became governor, which made it awkward, since he was now suing the state in which he was the top official. He ended up dropping the lawsuit.

ExxonMobil submitted its long-term plan, which was a concept, to the Division of Oil and Gas at the end of June. The idea to reinject the gas now to get more oil from fields makes sense, because the value of gas is low and there is no way to commercialize it in Alaska at this time.

Exxon had hoped to be part of the Walker Alaska LNG project, but that is not consistent with settlement agreement, since they are on different timelines.

But for the Administration, the Exxon plan conditioned certain deliverables on being able to get commercial contracts. In other words: All the risk of developing a gas project without a market. The company’s plan also didn’t go into enough detail for the Walker Administration:

“Exxon’s proposed POD is also inconsistent with the Settlement Agreement because it lacks the level of detail the WIOs committed to provide with this POD. For example, Paragraph 4.6.4(b) requires the POD to include ‘the number of drill wells, well locations, and completion plans.’ The proposed POD states only that “[t]wo new production wells and one new disposal well would be drilled at Central Pad.’ Exxon failed to include the bottomhole locations of these potential wells or any detail about its plans for completing the wells.

ExxonMobil operates Point Thomson, with BP as its primary partner, and has poured $4 billion into developing the gas field since the settlement with the State in 2012. Production of oil and gas condensate started last  year, and now the company is expected to expand production, but must have the Walker Administration’s approval.

Getting the gas from Point Thomson to Prudhoe calls for a 62.5-mile gasline that would link three new wells at Point Thomson, according to the plan, bringing the total number of wells to five.

Exxon would prefer to create a gasline project, but there is none on the horizon. However, ExxonMobil Alaska Production Manager Cory Quarles has committed that the company will make gas available to Walker’s Alaska LNG Project effort, “under bilateral, mutually agreed and commercially reasonable terms.”

The company just as likely could walk away from the leases and work elsewhere in the world. And it might have to, since the State has taken such a hostile position over the past three years.

 

The Walker Administration had not released any announcement of the rejection of Exxon’s plan by mid-morning.

This story is developing and will be updated.

Heads and Tails: Walker’s whirlwind campaign trips, Dispatch employee hosts fundraiser

CAMPAIGNING ON THE PUBLIC DIME? Gov. Bill Walker has been making the rounds in Kodiak, Kotzebue, and Bethel of late. And he’s traveling with an entourage.

In fact, nearly his entire cabinet went to Bethel with him. The cost of a trip like that has been in the works for weeks, and the cost to the public won’t be known for weeks, but with 14 of his core team plus security detail, it’s well over $20,000.

Walker signed a bill in a careful photograph that had only children in sight, and convened his cabinet behind closed doors in Bethel. Governor Walker, Lieutenant Governor Byron Mallott, and the Cabinet also hosted a community reception for Bethel residents.

Bethel is the hometown of Commissioner of Health and Social Services Valerie “Nurr’araaluk” Davidson. Davidson is reported to spend her summers in Bethel.

“I’m very pleased Lt. Governor Mallott, our commissioners, and I had the chance to engage with students in Bethel today and hear residents’ concerns,” Governor Walker said. “Convening the Cabinet in Bethel has been a goal of mine, and I thank the community for the warm reception. Hearing from Alaskans across the state keeps us all engaged and grounded, and equips us to continue pulling together for our state.”

There’s that, plus the fact that he had filed for re-election just a week prior.

ZINKE INVESTIGATION DROPPED: The Interior Department’s inspector general dropped its investigation into a reported phone call in late July from Zinke to Sen. Lisa Murkowski and Sen. Dan Sullivan telling them there would be dire consequences for Alaska due to Murkowski’s obstruction of Obamacare reform.

Evidently both senators refused to participate in the investigation over the content of those calls, so Interior Deputy Inspector General Mary Kendall said she was pulling the plug.

DISPATCH CHIEF NOW CO-HOSTING FUNDRAISER FOR WALKER: Two and a half years ago, one of the top managers of the Alaska Dispatch News was fired by owner Alice Rogoff because she had accepted a position on the Mayor Ethan Berkowitz transition team. Oddly, Rogoff announced the firing to a room full of business leaders at a Chamber of Commerce meeting.

“Our executive vice president for advertising is no longer with us. She became close to the Berkowitz campaign and is now a member of that transition team. It crossed a line that to me is … the appearance is somehow associated with our newspaper. we will never be active in political campaigns,” Rogoff told the group on May 21, 2015.

But now, the remaining titular executive vice president Dispatch, Margy Johnson, is cohosting a fundraiser for her longtime friend Gov. Bill Walker’s re-election.

Word is that Rogoff has asked Johnson to stay on until the newspaper changes hands. As executive vice president, she’s no longer listed in the staff box, but evidently taking a paycheck well into next month to keep an eye on the place for Rogoff. And with one foot out the door, getting onboard with the Walker camp may be a strategic career move.

So much for ADN non-involvement in political campaigns.

SPOTTED: In the Legislative Information Office yesterday, leftist political strategist and owner of the MidnightSunAK blog, Jim Lottsfeldt, who was in Rep. Jason Grenn’s office meeting with his staff.

Lottsfeldt is the money guy behind a new political action committee formed with Outside money to push Grenn’s anti-corruption initiative.

They probably won’t need much money because everyone is against corruption, right?

Here’s the donor list for the Massachusetts-based group that is behind the ballot initiative.

JUSTIN PARISH WANTS INCOME TAX: Juneau’s Rep. Justin Parish is still all-in on an income tax. At a townhall meeting last night, 16 people showed up to hear his pitch for their pocketbook.

“It’s my conviction that we should pay for our government rather than kicking it down the path,” Parish said, as quoted by the Juneau Empire. “I’m convinced, as I was from the time I ran, that the wisest course would be to implement a light income tax.”

And by light, he means those who are still working and haven’t received a raise for two years — and that would be many working in Alaska — would be asked to skim off some of their income so the State of Alaska doesn’t have to reduce the size of its workforce or trim its very generous social welfare programs.

Melania Trump’s stilettos turn critics into heels

2

When Michelle Obama had her first official portrait showing her in a sleeveless dress, the critics clucked that it was inappropriate for her to show her bare arms in a business setting like the White House.

But Politico defended her: “The sleeveless look is very much in keeping with what we’ve seen from Michelle Obama,” said Politico White House reporter Malika Henderson in 2009, writing of the first lady’s attire. “It is very much her signature look, so I wasn’t that surprised.”

Michelle Obama went sleeveless a lot. It was her signature look. By the end of the Obama presidency, she was showing a lot more than arms. She wore the lowest cut gowns of any first lady in photographic history — and no one blinked.

First Lady Melania Trump wears stiletto heels when she leaves the White House. It is her signature look. For a woman of a certain age — and yes, she is 47 — that is devotion to style. By her age, most Alaskan conservative women have chosen function over fashion. But Mrs. Trump is an urbanite, and a pair of XtraTufs have never slouched in her doorway, much less on her feet.

Not good enough for the critics, however. On a day when one of the worst disasters in U.S. history has swamped the Gulf Coast, and when North Korea has launched a missile at Japan, the critics took a break from the serious to criticize the First Footwear.

Politico wrote: “But on Tuesday, she appeared to put the wrong foot forward when she boarded Marine One, en route to visit emergency responders in hurricane-ravaged Texas, wearing towering black snakeskin stilettos.

“The emblematic first image of the first lady heading off to visit a hurricane in heels — a moment that the president has seized on as an opportunity to project strength and show off decisive leadership — instead became another symbol of a White House that can often seem out of touch.”

“On board Air Force One to Corpus Christi, as the picture of the delicate heels ricocheted across the Internet, Melania Trump changed into a pair of bright, white sneakers, which looked fresh out of the box.

Even Sarah Palin’s 2008 campaign stylist jumped in to tut-tut: “it was a mistake in the message it relays. A lot of eyes were on them. They’re going to a devastated area. She should be dressed accordingly.”

For those who lived through the Sarah Palin vice presidential wardrobe controversy, the moral outrage over a pair of high heels while walking to Air Force One is a reminder that there are few women in the public eye who can escape the scathing remarks of the critics.

And like most of the reflexively negative coverage of the Trump presidency, the story is subtly misleading.  It makes much of the heels she wore when boarding the plane, and rather little of the fact that she did not wear them when disembarking in Texas nor while visiting the hurricane damaged areas.

But so far as we know, the notice on the Gov. Bill Walker fundraiser for Sept. 5, which said “No stiletto heels” was not a microaggression against the First Lady.

And just for fun, we are sure it was not an unintentional commentary on the governor’s footwear of late:

Gov. Walker and his aide John-Henry Heckendorn don heels for the “Walk a Mile in Her Shoes” event in April.

Walker’s cohost for his first fundraiser: Lots of liberals on board

13

Mark Begich told his supporters to “keep your powder dry.” He is probably running for governor.

But for the Sept. 5 fundraiser for the re-election of Gov. Bill Walker and Lt. Gov. Byron Mallott, there’s a liberal flair on the co-host list that should make Begich nervous: From Walker’s longtime supporters Malcolm and Cindy Roberts, Margy Johnson (of the Alaska Dispatch News) to Juneauite Bruce Botelho, there are also a good number of die-hard Democrats. But it’s telling that very few Republicans signed on to co-host the event, which is probably the best poll out there for Mark Begich: Walker is carving out a piece of the Left. The event is being held at the home of his cabinet level oil adviser, John Hendrix. “No stiletto heels, please,” usually means they will have it under tents out on the expansive lawns behind their Atwood Estate home that is now known as “The Marilaine.”

 

 

Harvest season includes first full cannabis crop in Alaska

IT’S HIGH TIME TO PICK THAT POT

September is harvest season in Alaska and the fields are getting a haircut, while farmers’ markets in Southcentral are teeming with carrots and kale, potatoes and leeks, and a variety of other vegetables such as mizuna, snow apples, and daikon radish.

But for the first time, there’s a big new crop: Cannabis. Its harvest is well under way. By Sept. 21, the air is just too cold in most parts of Alaska — and the ground too — to do the plants any good. The end of the season for sativa plants has arrived.

With as many as 50 licensed commercial cannabis growers around the state working the short-but-intense Alaska growing season, the fall of 2017 will be the first year when a flush of legally grown Alaska marijuana is harvested.

Proposition 2 passed with the voters in 2015, allowing the growing and selling of marijuana. But that led to a long regulatory process that caused last year to be only a partially productive season for commercial cultivators.

This year, those knowledgeable in the industry predict that as much as 3,000 pounds of finished product will address what has been an undersupply problem that has been keeping pot prices in Alaska, ahem, high.

The marijuana industry has been one of the only job-growth sectors in Alaska’s long recession, which started about the time Gov. Bill Walker took office in 2014.

Each of the commercial growers in the state employ about five people, and with harvest season there is a burst of employment for about 30 people for each of these growers. These “trimmigrants” are skilled workers who understand how to make a bud worth hundreds of dollars.

Trimmers snip small leaves away from the bud and make the appearance as aesthetic as possible, since consumer decisions are highly influenced by the look of the bud. Often trimmers get paid by the pound.

“A good trimmer can make $30 an hour and a bad trimmer can turn $1,000 worth of weed into $500 pretty fast,” said one industry insider. Aesthetics of bud trimming, evidently, is a learned skill.

The harvest continues August through September, with growers walking a fine line to get all the plants harvested before the temperatures get too cold.

Most of the harvest will be done in the Mat-Su Valley, where growers use large “high-tunnel” greenhouse systems. To force the plants to bud before they’d normally be ready, growers induce artificial darkness midway through the season by draping their greenhouses for as much as 12 hours a day. The plants are sensitive to the cycle of the sun.

Because of the cold temperatures setting in, most outdoor growers will get only one harvest per year, but that harvest can be worth millions of dollars.

More than 700 Alaskans are said to be working in the cannabis industry, with cultivators averaging five employees each — and up to 30 during the harvest. With about 30 retail stores now open, each employing 5-10 people, and processing, manufacturing and testing labs employing up to another 100, the marijuana industry is a rare economic bright spot in a state that has the highest unemployment in the nation. That doesn’t count the marketing, packaging, transportation, security, and other spin-off economies.

Some of the jobs in the industry require specialized knowledge and experience, according the Alaska Cannabis Institute:

  • Cannabis cultivators, who need to know about nutrients, growing mediums, light and temperature control, diseases and breeding.
  • Extraction technicians, who manufacture concentrates through the use of dry ice, propane, butane and other hazardous materials.
  • Food preparation, such as candy makers and bakers. An experienced cannabis chef can demand up to $30 an hour.
  • Budtender, like a bartender for cannabis, is the point-of-sales person advising and selling all the products to the consumer. The hourly rate can start at about $15.

SOCIAL CLUBS, CAFES NOW UNDERGOING REGULATORY REVIEW

The next stage of legalized marijuana use is under consideration, which would allow for social clubs or cafes that would operate similar to bars that serve alcoholic beverages.  Regulations to enable such public consumption are under consideration and are currently open to public comment.

It’s a move that been requested by a diverse cross-section of the population — tourism, local government, and consumers have all requested it.

The tourism industry has wanted a solution to tourists buying cannabis and then using hotel rooms or rental cars to consume it. They prefer a licensed establishment where tourists can use product safely. Consumers of pot who rent in pot-free buildings also have been seeking places where they can get high, proponents say.

The Walker Administration has slow-walked this part of the regulatory process, while publicly claiming to support the voter initiative that was Ballot Measure 2. His administration has let the tourism season go by without providing a viable mechanism for tourists to actually consume the pot they buy in Alaska.

However, last week, the State of Alaska posted a notice of a change in regulations that would allow retail licensees to apply for onsite consumption permits.

Under the proposal, the state would allow cannabis buying and consuming on site, either by vaporization or smoking,  in one gram limits. No concentrates would be allowed but pot-laced consumables and pot-free food could be sold. There is a proposed rule that would protect cannabis cafe workers from exposure to marijuana smoke while working.

Comments are being received no later than 4:30 pm, Oct. 27 at the Alcohol & Marijuana Control Office at 550 West 7th Avenue, Suite 1600, Anchorage, AK 99501 and by email at [email protected].

The control board is also taking questions about the changes they propose in these regulations, and people may submit those questions at least 10 days before the end of the public comment period. The agency will aggregate its responses to similar questions and make those available on the Alaska Online Public Notice System.

 

Nome Native corporation sues to remove three directors from board

2

Sitnasuak Native Corporation has filed a lawsuit to remove three of its directors for breaking the law.

The legal move is to preserve election integrity, transparency, and the confidence shareholders have in a corporation that has both profit and cultural preservation as its core missions.

The Nome-based corporation says the three breached their fiduciary duties to Sitnasuak and its shareholders when they coordinated and sent anonymous proxy solicitations to corporation shareholders.

If true that would be a violation of Alaska banking and securities law, and is a felony.

The anonymous proxy mailer misinformed Sitnasuak shareholders and damaged the corporation, the lawsuit alleges. It was sent in advance of the June 3 meeting, which failed to reach a quorum and has been rescheduled to Sept. 30 in Anchorage.

The mailer was sent from “SNC Shareholders for Free Speech” to 1,000 shareholders, and did not identify the persons behind the message that backed candidates Barbara Amarok and Helen Bell, and opposed Jason Evans, who was running for his second term. It also gave the readers false and misleading information regarding voting and how the proxy system works, the lawsuit alleges.

Evans is a newspaper publisher of the Homer Tribune, the Arctic Sounder and the Dutch Harbor Fisherman/Bristol Bay Times, and is part of the business group attempting to purchase the Alaska Dispatch News through the newly formed Binkley Company LLC.

One of the three accused of violating the board election process and attempting to remove Evans is Edna Baker, who is a former Division of Elections supervisor.  Until last year, Baker oversaw elections in Western Alaska. She retired from her position prior to the voting fraud scandal that rocked District 40 and swung the election from Rep. Ben Nageak to challenger Dean Westlake.

The other two that Sitnasuak is requesting being removed for colluding on the election mailer are Barbara Amarok and Charles Fagerstrom Jr.  Chuck Fagerstrom Sr., the former president of the corporation, had been released by the corporation earlier.

“Our number one priority is to protect the rights of all shareholders and we cannot do that if our elections are compromised,” said Sitnasuak Chairman Bobby Evans, who is the brother of Jason Evans.  “Today, we must look to the future and work together to protect our shared legacy while strengthening our values.”

The lawyer from Holland & Knight said it was about complying with banking and securities laws: “In order to comply with state securities law, Sitnasuak Native Corporation needed to take appropriate legal actions to protect shareholders’ rights and the integrity of future elections,” said Howard Trickey of the law firm representing Sitnasuak.

The new date for the Sitnasuak annual meeting is Sept. 30. On the agenda is the election of four directors to the board.

Sitnasuak shareholders number more than 2,800 and most originated in Nome and villages in the Bering Strait region of Northwest Alaska.  The are Iñupiaq, Yup’ik and St. Lawrence Island Yupiks. The corporation paid more than $2 million in  economic benefits to shareholders in 2016, including special elder dividends, bereavement benefits, heating fuel and rent discounts, and regular dividends.

Voices of Alaskans are heard in health care reform

GUEST OPINION

By SENATOR DAN SULLIVAN and
CONGRESSMAN DON YOUNG

After the enactment of the Affordable Care Act (ACA), we began to hear stories from Alaska families and small businesses that were experiencing fewer healthcare choices and paying skyrocketing costs for health insurance.

In the past few years, those stories have continued with greater frequency and urgency, including those we have heard from Alaskans this summer.

These are tragic stories of real Alaskans, desperately hurting as a result of the ACA. Somehow, these people’s voices have been lost in the ads recently run in Alaska and in the larger political discussion across the country centered on the ACA. Helping these Alaskans and so many others throughout the state is the reason we have been fighting to repeal and repair the Affordable Care Act, as we promised to do.

To be clear: The specter of tens of thousands of Alaskans getting kicked off Medicaid, as depicted in these ads and related political commentary, was incorrect. We would have not have voted for a final health care reform bill that had this result.

We have been against the ACA from the beginning because we believed that, in the end, it would not deliver affordable, quality care for Alaskans. While it’s true that more Alaskans are now insured, it’s also true that many Alaskans now can’t afford the very limited insurance options that are available to them.

Here are just a few of their stories:

One of our constituents lives in Eagle River. He’s worked hard, makes a good living and is solidly middle class. He’s paying more than $30,000 a year in premiums and his deductible before he receives coverage. We’ve heard versions of his story over and over again.

Another Alaska small business owner is being forced to pay $32,000 a year for coverage. She makes close to $100,000 a year — too much for much of a subsidy. But she’s supporting her disabled husband, and two sons. We’ve heard versions of her story over and over again.

A chiropractor in Soldotna is losing customers because of the high cost of insurance. His predicament is compounded by the $3,000 a month he must pay for insurance for his wife and three children, plus a $6,500 deductible per-person. “We are HURTING!” he wrote.

We’ve heard versions of his story over and over.

Another Alaskan constituent said that she and her husband used to pay $200 a month in premiums for insurance. Now they pay $2,000 a month. “We’re just working class people,” she said. “Obamacare has taken everything from us. It’s the first time in our lives we’re without health insurance because we can’t afford it.”

The promises made by those promoting the ACA — Alaskans would have more choices, keep their doctors and their plans, see their premiums and deductibles decrease — haven’t materialized.

To the contrary, since 2013, premiums in the individual market in Alaska have increased 203 percent. The average premium in Alaska is close to $1,100 a month for a plan to cover just one person. These are the most expensive premiums in the nation by far. These premium spikes have coincided with the number of insurers in Alaska’s individual market falling from five to just one.

Many Alaskans are being subsidized by taxpayers to pay these crushing costs. But many aren’t and are having to pay exorbitant premiums and deductibles or pay a penalty to the federal government for refusing to do so. Indeed, as of 2014, when the numbers were last available, about 23,000 Alaskans either could not afford health insurance under the ACA, or bristled at the individual mandate requiring them to purchase coverage, choosing instead to opt out of coverage altogether and pay a penalty to their own federal government.

Just as people who before couldn’t get insurance because they couldn’t afford the high cost of what was available in the high risk pools, the many Alaskans who receive little to no subsidy and have to pay the full cost, cannot be ignored.

They are our middle class. Our job creators. Our entrepreneurs. They are the backbone of Alaska’s economy which is already struggling through a recession. We cannot afford to lose more middle class Alaskans and we have not, and will not, stop fighting for them.

Although we are the first to admit that we could have done a better job explaining our health care form efforts, Republicans in Congress did have a plan to repeal and repair the ACA — one that we and our staffs had been working on nonstop for months — and one that we were confident would help Alaskan families who are being financially devastated by the ACA while at the same time protecting those Alaskans who became covered under the ACA.

We want to emphasize that the plan would not have pulled the rug out from under anyone in our state, particularly vulnerable Alaskans in our Medicaid population.

Congress’ most recent effort on healthcare, the Better Care Reconciliation Act (BRCA), included the following provisions, many of which we played a key role in ensuring were in the bill, and ones that we will continue to fight for:

— Retaining key ACA protections, including continuous coverage for those with preexisting conditions, allowing dependents to stay on their parents’ insurance plan until they are 26 years old, and continuing to disallow lifetime or yearly caps on coverage.

— Repealing the ACA’s onerous mandates, like the individual and employer mandates, and burdensome taxes, like the so-called “Cadillac tax,” which will further drive up costs and will have an enormous negative impact on the vast majority of health care plans in Alaska.

— Providing more flexibility to Alaska to design its own health care system and bring down premium costs, while supporting such state-based innovations with billions of dollars of federal support, including specific federal funding set-asides for states like Alaska with the highest premiums in the country.

— Establishing a $45 billion fund to help states, like Alaska, that are struggling with mental health and drug addiction epidemics, like opioids and heroin. Alaska would have received tens of millions of dollars from this BRCA provision to help those in recovery.

— Dramatically increasing funding for Community Health Centers throughout the country, 160 of which are in Alaska, constituting 10 percent of America’s community health centers and serving more than 100,000 Alaskans per year.

— Protecting the significant advances made by the Alaska Native health care delivery system, which has been a bright spot for health care in our state.

Finally, the BRCA would have begun the important process of putting our nation’s Medicaid system on a sustainable and equitable path for America and Alaska, protecting our most vulnerable citizens and future generations who need this vital program. We worked for months on this important and complex topic. We were confident that any final health care reform bill would have protected Alaska’s disabled, blind, low income, and expansion populations under Medicaid and would have brought more, not less, Medicaid funding to Alaska.

Unfortunately, the BRCA did not receive majority support in the U.S. Senate and the ability to continue to move forward with these important reforms means that, for the short term at least, the status quo will remain.

But we haven’t given up. Going forward, we will continue to advocate for many of these provisions included in the BCRA. We will also be examining other ways to address the ever-increasing costs of health care in America, including lowering pharmaceutical prices, dis-incentivizing the practice of excessive defensive medicine, instituting medical malpractice reforms, and continuing to focus on our mental health and drug addiction challenges.

We will also continue working with the heads of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services and the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services to encourage them to focus on the specific challenges we have in Alaska, and to bring much needed relief to spiking premium and deductible costs as best we can through the current law and regulations.

We are confident that the granting of Alaska’s 1332 waiver by the Trump administration, the first of its kind and a model for other states, will bring some relief to our citizens with a decrease in premiums in the individual market for the first time in years.

The healthcare debate over the last nine years has been beset by many promises. When advertising the original ACA legislation, Democrats made extensive promises that didn’t come true. Republicans also made a promise to repeal and repair the ACA. As of now, none of these promises have been kept.

Breaking these promises can breed cynicism in the political process, especially in such politically challenging times. Our promise to Alaskans is to continue to work relentlessly for you, educating others about Alaska, listening, and taking input from all sides and then developing legislative proposals to help address Alaska’s unique challenges.

We still believe that the best course for Alaska and our nation is to repeal and repair the ACA. We fear that without serious reforms to our health care system, chaos and uncertainty will continue. Without reforms, our middle class will continue to suffer. Our state will continue to lose workers and our businesses will be forced to pay increasingly higher health care costs and lower wages to their employees.

“There is nothing affordable about my health insurance options.” – long-time Alaskan

“There is nothing affordable about my health insurance options,” one long-time Alaskan wrote. Her monthly premiums in 2016 would have been $1,441, with a $5,250 deductible. She decided to risk being uninsured.

“Those fees, on top of the $300 a month for the necessary thyroid and statin medications I require, have brought me to the point where I will not be able to afford health care.”

She’s 62 years old. Her husband is 70. They own a small business, hire people and pay taxes. He should have retired by now, but he can’t because they need to save up in case something happens to her health. She’s a tough Alaskan, but for her, it’s infuriating, and it’s frightening. “We’re gambling,” she said. “But there are no other options.”

Doing nothing for this Alaskan, and thousands of others in similar dire circumstances, is not an option that should be acceptable to any Alaskan.

Don Young represents Alaska in the U.S. House of Representatives. Dan Sullivan represents Alaska in the U.S. Senate.