Tuesday, July 8, 2025
Home Blog Page 1648

Craig is first tribe applying for federal trust status

0
screen-shot-2016-10-25-at-2-19-28-pm
Craig, Alaska, from city-data.com

A MARIJUANA BUSINESS IS THE BUZZ

The Bureau of Indian Affairs has received its first request from an Alaska tribe to bring its land into “trust” status with the Federal government.

The State of Alaska was notified earlier this month and has until Nov. 9 to comment on the application of the Craig Tribal Association, which is requesting that a one-acre lot in the City of Craig be placed under federal management.

The land in question is the location of the tribe’s administrative building, tribal hall, a Head Start program, and commercial space. It also includes parking. The City of Craig currently exempts the property from the tax rolls, so there will be little impact to the city’s budget.

[Related: Indian Country just days away]

But moving the land into trust would allow the tribe to start a gambling casino in Craig, a town of 1,200 people, although no such plans have been announced.

The tribe has, however, spoken openly about starting a marijuana business on the property.

Prior to this summer, the State of Alaska had stood in opposition to allowing tribes to put their lands into federal control, effectively as reservations.

That was until Gov. Bill Walker stepped away from the legal challenge this summer, allowing tribes to request of the BIA the special status that had been denied them under the Alaska Native Claims Settlement Act.

Some municipal leaders are concerned. One told us: “The State is starving the municipalities because the State budget problem, and now taking lands right in the heart of downtowns and taking them off the tax rolls — this is going to hurt some communities.”

The Alaska Municipal League meeting in Anchorage on Nov. 14-16 will delve into the lands-into-trust issues with a workshop, and the Alaska Conference of Mayors, headed by Craig Mayor Dennis Watson, will also take up the issue and how it affects communities when it meets on Nov. 17 in Anchorage.

The State of Alaska is gathering information about the application and any jurisdictional problems or land-use conflicts that may present themselves.

The period for submitting comments to the State of Alaska has passed, but comments can be sent to the BIA’s Alaska Regional Office at 3601 C Street, Suite 1100, Anchorage, AK 99503.

Craig’s city council has sent a letter to the BIA asking a wide range of questions and requesting that the agency send fact-finding staff to the Prince of Wales Island community to fully vet the proposal and help residents understand the implications of lands-into-trust. The city council has also asked for an extension of time for the comment period.

For another take on the transition Alaska is making to Indian Country, read what Don Mitchell had to say earlier this year. Mitchell is a former general counsel for the Alaska Federation of Natives and the author of Wampum: How Indian Tribes, the Mafia, and an Inattentive Congress Invented Indian Gaming and Created a $28 Billion Gambling Empire.

Why is Robin Brena spending so much?

0

robin brena

QUARTER-MILLION-DOLLAR MAN

Who is Robin Brena, cunning lawyer and political needle-mover in Alaska?

Until a couple of years ago, no one had much heard of him.

Since 2012, Brena has poured a quarter million dollars into Alaska Democratic races and to independent groups opposing Republicans.

And that’s only the known amount. No other single Alaskan is putting so much money into campaigns — no Republican, no Democrat, no undeclared. Only the Gottstein empire comes close.

In 2014, Brena also purchased Gov. Bill Walker’s law firm for an undisclosed amount, although records show it was between $200,000 and $400,000.

What does he get out of being the kingmaker? He becomes the governor’s top adviser. He calls the governor and you can be sure Walker picks up the phone. This is a tight relationship, and it’s what is running government in Alaska today.

To see what Brena and Walker are pushing, one need only observe his drumbeat on the “Our Fair Share” theme to know that there is something in the works to raise taxes on oil companies. His Alaska Dispatch News column of Oct. 24, 2016 is the foreshadowing of what is to come because Brena is not giving out money for no reason. The people he supports will need to follow his direction in oil and gas taxation or he can just as easily take them out during the next election cycle.

THIS YEAR’S TALLY

Since the beginning of 2016, Brena and his wife Barbara have spent what is technically known as gobs of cash on Democratic races in Alaska, making them the biggest players in Alaska politics today.

Here’s the tally from this year, as reported through the primary. Make no mistake, any of these politicians who are elected will take a call from Brena at any time of day, for any length of time. And they won’t argue with him.

Robin and Barbara Brena’s known contributions for 2016:

01/27/16 $ 500.00 Shirley Ann Cote’
02/09/16 $5000.00 Alaska Democratic Party
10/13/15 $ 500.00 Matt Claman
06/29/16 $ 500.00 Jason Grenn
07/15/16 $ 500.00 Paul Seaton
07/12/16 $ 500.00 Jim Colver
06/27/16 $ 500.00 Harry T. Crawford Jr.
07/01/16 $500.00 Jonathan Kreiss-Tomkins
06/23/16 $5,000.00 Alaska Democratic Party
06/27/16 $ 500.00 Daniel (Dan) H Ortiz
06/25/16 $ 5,000.00 House Democratic Campaign Committee
06/24/16 $ 500.00 Matt Claman
06/29/16 $ 500.00 Les Gara
06/27/16 $ 500.00 Zach Fansler
07/10/16 $ 500.00 Adam Wool
06/27/16 $ 500.00 Ivy A Spohnholz
06/12/16 $ 500.00 Luke Hopkins
06/27/16 $ 500.00 Dean Westlake
08/03/16 $35,000.00 Together for Alaska
08/13/16 $ 500.00 Louise B. Stutes
08/15/16 $500.00 Jeff Landfield
09/29/16 $500.00 Patricia Faye-Brazel
06/29/16 $500.00 Jason Grenn
06/24/16 $500.00 Matt Claman
06/27/16 $500.00 Ivy Spohnholz
06/12/16 $500.00 Luke Hopkins
06/27/16 $500.00 Harriett Drummond
08/01/16 $478.87 Dean Westlake
Total: Brena known 2016 expenditures to date: $61,978.00

BRENA REFRESHER COURSE:

Alaska’s George Soros 
Brena’s ‘Our Fair Share’ drumbeat
Governor targets Nageak through surrogate hit squad

Governor starts pushing Rogoff’s Port Clarence — again

0

 

screen-shot-2016-10-23-at-11-25-07-pm
Port Clarence is on the Bering Sea, to the right of the satellite photo in what looks like a shark’s mouth.
Gov. Bill Walker once again appears to be doing the bidding of the publisher of the Alaska Dispatch News.
In a letter to the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Walker has asked that Port Clarence once again be included in plans for an Arctic port. Alice Rogoff, who owns Alaska’s largest newspaper, has long had a desire to see a deep water port built there. She has financial interests through her advisory capacity at PT Capital, an Arctic investment entity, and her husband’s firm, The Carlyle Group, which has developed an Arctic investment strategy.
PT Capital’s cofounder is Hugh Short, who also sits on the board of the Alaska Gasline Development Corporation, which is tasked with building a gasline to tidewater.
During the last legislative session, the capital budget included $1.6 million for the Nome Deep Draft Arctic Port design at the behest of the conservative majority. The money was appropriated to the City of Nome as a grant, allowing Nome to take over as the 50/50 cost sharing partner on the project.
Sen. Anna MacKinnon and the Senate moved the project forward by adding the needed $1.6 million to a very slim capital budget to help the project stay on track.
Once design work is complete, the project will go to Congress for construction funding.
The project goes back many years: In 2011, the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers began studying a port deep enough for large ships that would eventually traverse ice-free Arctic waters.
The option finally chosen by the Corps will expand the Port of Nome, dredging the harbor to a depth of 28 feet. Port Clarence lost out in that decision.
The Department of Transportation had previously been the cost sharing partner but Gov. Bill Walker neglected to include the cost share money in his DOT budget.
rogoffEnter Alice Rogoff.  She has been a proponent of the Port Clarence project both publicly and privately. And her relationship with the governor is probably closer than any publisher in America has with a sitting governor.
She’s been part of Walker’s financial restructuring advisory team — a group of highly accomplished Alaskans who have met with the governor at his invitation to help him navigate the financial crisis. Many Alaskans believe she also worked hard to get him elected.
Why is Port Clarence not in contention for the project any longer? Because after a year of study and evaluation, the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers selected Nome as more economical and more likely to be an ice-free port first.
While Nome has a protective jetty that shelters a large outer harbor, and boasts a fully functional airport, housing, roads, electricity, Port Clarence has none of these things. In fact, Port Clarence would require a 70-mile road to complete the project.
In his Oct. 20 letter to the U.S. Department of Defense, Walker has asked the federal government to not only re-insert Port Clarence, but to call it the Nome/Port Clarence project.
The governor’s letter echoes the opinion piece signed by Rogoff in her newspaper in 2013.
Funding for two Arctic ports in Alaska is unlikely, but delaying the entire project to open up a two-port alternative could be the result of Walker’s actions.
Why does the governor insist on returning to the Port Clarence discussion?
There are myriad business interests afoot in the Arctic, and Rogoff has ties to many of the known players.
In a 2014 news story in the Dispatch, Sen. Lesil McGuire said she had met with Guggenheim Partners, Carlyle Group, and Citibank Energy. “There’s nearly $100 billion in development planned, but it may not come to Alaska,” she said. Carlyle Group is run by the husband of Rogoff, David Rubenstein.
In Foreign Policy Association blog in 2011, the Carlyle-Guggenheim-Rogoff relationship came to light:

Countries, non-profit organizations, indigenous peoples, and natural resource companies are all interested in obtaining a part of the Arctic. Now, we can add a hedge fund to the list. Guggenheim Partners, the financial services company which manages over $125 billion in assets, has confirmed that it is looking into establishing an investment fund in the Arctic, perhaps with a focus on Alaska. Alice Rogoff, publisher of the online newspaper Alaska Dispatch and wife of the co-founder of the Carlyle Group, David Rubenstein, first announced the news at the World Affairs Council’s “Politics of Global Climate Change” conference at University of Alaska Southeast in Juneau earlier last week. Rogoff also suggested that one investment possibility for Guggenheim would be to privately fund the construction of an icebreaker, which it could then lease out to the U.S. Coast Guard. However, Lawson Brigham, a professor and retired Coast Guard captain, observed that this would likely not be practical, given that the Coast Guard would need full and unrestricted access to a federally-funded ship during war, should it ever break out in the Arctic.

Rogoff added, “The single biggest source of investment dollars in Guggenheim’s or probably anybody’s fund will be China.” This would be an indirect way for China to invest in and potentially profit from the Arctic even though it does not have any territory there. This would not be the first instance of private Chinese investment in the Arctic: Businessman Huang Nubo is planning to buy a swath of land equal to one percent of Iceland to turn into an ecoresort.

Guggenheim spokesman Jeffrey Kelley remarked, “We are in the very early planning stages for an Arctic investment fund. At this point in time it would be premature to comment further about potential structure or investment parameters.” Guggenheim reportedly posted a link to the article in Alaska Dispatch about the fund, but they seem to have removed it from their website, as I am unable to locate it.

Read the entire story here.

With Chinese money in the mix, and in the interests of transparency, Gov. Walker should come clean and tell Alaskans why he is trying to change the Arctic Deep Water Port project, who will benefit from the inevitable delay of the Nome deep water port, and why he’d take such a risk with a project that is already so difficult to fund.

Norway understands value of roads

0
norway-floating-tunnel
Norway is weighing a new innovation – floating tunnels.

By WIN GRUENING

Long admired by uber-liberals for its socialistic-style welfare state, Norway is often held up as an example for Alaska to follow — despite its lack of fit with Alaskans’ independent, self-reliant image.

However, I’ll be the first to admit Norway does some things right and similarities abound.

Norway occupies the same latitudes as Alaska, with an Arctic climate in the north and a more moderate marine climate in the south. Its soaring mountains —the highest of which are less than half the height of Alaska’s tallest peaks — are every bit as beautiful. Its rugged coastal terrain and spectacular fjords could easily be mistaken for Alaska’s southeast coast.

Norway’s economy, like Alaska’s, is over-dependent on the oil industry and faces serious pressure due to collapsing oil prices. The country has wisely amassed a large sovereign wealth fund — similar to our Permanent Fund — but unlike us decided long ago to use it to partially offset the cost of government.

Norway views transportation infrastructure differently as well. While Alaska struggles to build a mere 50 miles of road to connect our state capital with the rest of Alaska and the continental road system, Norway has embarked on an ambitious project to re-route and modernize its E39 highway, stretching 800 miles along their west coast, by eliminating all seven ferry crossings along the route.

Predictably, delays have stalled the project, although not for reasons you might suspect. Local mayors campaigned hard to get the new route built through their municipalities, because of the job opportunities the project would create and new residents it would attract. Arguments over the route caused long delays, drawing criticism over the length of the planning process. 

“There have been several different alternatives for the transition ……,” Norwegian Prime Minister Erna Solberg explained. “That has meant it has taken time to go through it. It is a decision that has large local significance. It is clear that where the road goes, it will also give economic injections…”

How different that sounds from the years of delay the Juneau Access project has endured because of environmental opposition and nuisance lawsuits. It’s certainly different than the frantic claims from road opponents that death, destruction and environmental degradation will result by building a road that reduces transportation costs, increases capacity and makes travel more convenient.

It’s interesting that technological challenges in building the East Lynn Canal Highway pale in comparison to those Norway faces in crossing seven different fjords — some over two miles wide and 4,000 feet deep — to provide hard road links the entire length of the route.

Instead of throwing up their hands and saying it can’t be done, Norway chose a visionary process that embraces new technologies to tunnel through mountains, or construct underwater floating tunnels or floating suspension bridges unlike any in the world today.

The reason Norway is investing in a project of this magnitude — a ferry-free main national highway — is because the benefits of doing so far outweigh the cost. The current 21-hour travel time will be cut to 11 hours. Economic expansion will naturally follow resulting in more jobs and an increase in population and tax revenue.

Norway realizes that over time, roads are far less costly in capital and operating costs. Replacing ferry routes with road extensions will greatly increase capacity, frequency, travel opportunity and offer significant travel time and user cost savings. Ferries, because of their limitations, essentially restrict demand, reduce flexibility, and make transportation more costly or prohibitive. Ferry subsidies tend to be very high, increase over time, and continue in perpetuity.

Yet Alaska, facing the same fiscal challenges and sorely needing the economic benefits this road would provide, continues to wrestle with the decision. It’s puzzling why this is so. The federal government would pay for 90 percent of road construction, and the state contribution, already appropriated, is paltry compared to the economic return.

Contrary to opponent’s claims, the Juneau road would not be a “dead-end.” While we cannot make the Lynn Canal Highway a hard road link yet, the benefits of a longer road coupled with a 6-mile shuttle ferry would be enormous, reducing the seven-hour travel time of a mainline ferry to three hours.

Travelers from Juneau could drive to Katzehin and catch a short 27-minute shuttle ferry ride to Haines and beyond. The cost would be $15 plus $4.50 per passenger — 88 percent less than the current $274 one-way ticket for a vehicle and four passengers.

It would also strengthen our existing ferry system, allowing mainliners to serve other ports more frequently while lowering overall system costs. 

From President Eisenhower’s big bet on the interstate highway system to Norway’s groundbreaking project, history continues to favor those who build roads. They will always lead us to greater places.

Win Gruening is retired as the senior vice president of business banking for Key Bank. Born and raised in Juneau, he active in community affairs and is involved in local and statewide organizations.

Bright, shiny objects: Events

0

Oct. 25, 5:30 PM – 7:30 pm: Midnight Sun Republican Women’s Club annual membership meeting, Morris Communications Building conference room, 301 Arctic Slope Drive, Anchorage. Side door. Speakers are Natasha von Imhof, Liz Vazquez, and Jennifer Johnson, all candidates for office.

Oct. 26, 6 pm: District 25 meeting at 1227 E. 75th Street. Agenda includes electing new vice-chair for district. Contact: mistymmay at hotmail dot you-know-what.

LISA MURKOWSKI DEBATES
Oct. 26 – Senate Debate on the Arctic, hosted by Iñuit Arctic Business Alliance (IABA) in Barrow
Nov. 3 – Debate for the State, hosted by Alaska Public Media in Anchorage

DON YOUNG DEBATES

Oct. 24: Fairbanks Chamber of Commerce Candidate Forum, Carlson Center, Fairbanks
Nov. 3: Debate for the State, Alaska Public Media

 

johnston-giessel

screen-shot-2016-10-22-at-8-55-04-pmscreen-shot-2016-10-22-at-10-41-59-am

Sally Jewell: Feds are all-in on Native-federal land trust

0

screen-shot-2016-10-21-at-4-31-28-pm

Secretary of the Interior Sally Jewell met with Gov. Bill Walker for a good three hours on Thursday during the Alaska Federation of Natives’ annual convention in Fairbanks.

It was a private, unnoticed meeting prior to Jewell’s Friday announcement that she has signed Order 3342, which directs her department to cooperate and collaborate with Alaska Native tribes on more of a government-to-government basis.

The directive follows court actions that unwound provisions of the Alaska Native Claims Settlement Act, whereby reservation land was disallowed in Alaska. Gov. Walker chose to not fight the court ruling to the Supreme Court.

Today’s eight-page ruling directs the federal government to begin working toward co-management of Native lands. The new relationship between the tribes and the federal government makes no mention of the State of Alaska as an entity with any  cooperative or collaborative standing. The State of Alaska simply doesn’t factor in with tribes who align with the federal government.

The action came after the settling of Akiachak Native Community v. Department of the Interior, which allows the Bureau of Indian Affairs to begin taking title to land in Alaska on behalf of Alaska tribes. This is the introduction of “Indian Country” into a state that has been without it for decades. It will leave the State of Alaska with no civil authority over large sections of Alaska land. There will be no taxes paid by the lands that go into federal trust. It’s a whole new world.

The order includes collaborative management of fish, wildlife, plant material, historical sites, landscapes, resources, maintenance and information relating to tribal, cultural, or educational activities.

No announcement of the Jewell meeting or reaction to the order was given by the Governor’s Office or Lieutenant Governor’s Office. Lt. Gov. Byron Mallott has long been a proponent of Indian Country in Alaska and has patiently prodded Gov. Walker to not challenge the court ruling in favor of tribes and against the State of Alaska.

“This Secretarial Order reflects the Obama Administration’s deep commitment to strengthen respect between the United States government and Native American and Alaska Native leaders and communities while boosting our efforts to increase tribal self-determination and self-governance,” said Secretary Jewell in a statement. “This kind of collaboration with tribal nations will help ensure that we’re appropriately and genuinely integrating indigenous expertise, experience and perspectives into the management of public lands.”

The order applies to all the agencies in the Department of Interior, including the National Park Service, Bureau of Land Management, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Bureau of Ocean Energy Management and Bureau of Reclamation, directing them to identify opportunities and try to partner with tribes in the management of their lands and waters.

Together for Alaska uses grieving widow to attack Coghill

0

When Brandy Johnson’s husband was killed by gunfire on May 1, 2014, she and her three daughters were left grieving and without health coverage.

That’s because her husband was Sgt. Scott Johnson, an heroic Alaska State Trooper, and his health care benefits ended along with his life when he was shot while responding to a call in Tanana with fellow trooper Gabriel Rich, who also died that spring day.

Gov. Sean Parnell responded quickly to the situation and directed the state to pay health care benefits for the widow and her children, at a cost of about $66,000 a  year. They continue to this day.

Now, Johnson is being used in Together for Alaska’s latest savage political attack ad against Sen. John Coghill.

In the ad, Mrs. Johnson infers that Coghill is what’s wrong with the system that left her and her children without health coverage.

Except that they weren’t without coverage. Parnell made sure of that.

together-dividing-2

TOGETHER FOR STRAFING ALASKANS

Together for Alaska, funded by a union under the umbrella of the AFL-CIO and Gov. Walker’s surrogate lawyer Robin Brena, are using the same scorched earth tactic that Mark Begich used against now-Sen. Dan Sullivan, when Begich rolled out a patently false portrayal of Sullivan’s culpability in the Jerry Active murder case.

It backfired on Begich badly.

There’s no disputing the tragedy in Tanana reverberates through the lives of survivors, who will feel the pain for the rest of their lives, as their beloved family members never return to the family table.

But Brandy Johnson has been transformed into blunt instrument against a man of character, principle and faith; a man who has always tried to do the right thing for the people of Fairbanks.

Her grievance is House Bill 66, which didn’t pass the Legislature last session. HB 66 would change current state retirement policy and provide health care coverage for families of those killed in the line of duty, until they can claim retirement benefits. The children of the deceased law enforcement officer would have health care coverage until age 26, covered by the State of Alaska.

The tug of war over the bill happened mainly in the House, because the bill had some problems.

Coghill’s only interaction with the bill was in trying to squeeze it into SB 91, the criminal justice reform bill. Lawyers said that violated single subject rule.

The remedy? Have the bill introduced again this session. Make it a single subject bill. Help it be the right bill that passes a constitutional test. Ask the Fairbanks delegation to introduce it.

Instead, Together for Alaska has taken advantage of a grieving widow. Brandy Johnson has received her benefits for two years, and there’s no reason to think she will not continue to receive her benefits far into the future.

In fact, if she wanted these benefits to be codified, rather than part of the operating budget, she needs only to prevail upon Gov. Bill Walker to promulgate regulations, which he could do in a heartbeat. Why doesn’t he? Perhaps he prefers the pomp of an actual bill.

The tragedy of Sgt. Johnson and Rich’s deaths touch us Alaskans deeply, but dividing Alaskans in this way is something that Together for Alaska has gotten away with for months.

Who will call Together for Alaska Chairman Tom Wescott, and main funders lawyer Robin Brena and Union Boss Joey Merrick out on this video, which is intended to prop up support for Democrat Luke Hopkins through treachery?

We will — it’s beneath them and it’s an affront to all that Alaskans stand for.

 

Young, Lindbeck at forestry forum

0

img_4390

Alaska Congressman Don Young prevailed like a boss over Democratic challenger Steve Lindbeck during Thursday’s Alaska Forest Association / Resource Development Council Forum.

Compared to debates on the national level, the exchange was positively civil. Only friendly jabs were thrown and the two men, who have known each other for decades, landed no big punches.

In fact, during the forum at the Captain Cook Hotel, Lindbeck agreed with almost all of the positions espoused by Young, with the exception of these:

  1. Lindbeck feels Young should have intervened in a private contractual matter involving escort vessels in Prince William Sound. Rep. Young said it would be an ethics violation to try to pick winners and losers in the business-to-business dealings of Alyeska Pipeline Service Company.
  2. Lindbeck believes that Hillary Clinton will be elected president and that if the former journalist wins Alaska’s only congressional seat he’ll have access to the White House. Young feels that the majority of a congressional representative’s job is in Congress and he hopes Hillary Clinton doesn’t win.
  3. Lindbeck said the Pebble Mine is a bad project. The mine was prevented from proceeding with an application for permits by an overreaching Environmental Protection Agency and Lindbeck admitted that the EPA had exceeded its authority. Young offered no opinion on the project but said he is mad that the company was denied its due process: It wasn’t even allowed to present its plans for evaluation.

OLD GUYS MATTER

Both candidates think the other is too old. Lindbeck said: “Forty-three years is a long time to get a lot of post offices named.” He wondered rhetorically why Young had not fixed all the problems he identified with the EPA, federal overreach, and the Endangered Species Act. “It’s not rocket science. I don’t think it’s impossible to figure out how to work in Congress. I will represent Alaska’s interests by working with everyone.”

Young joked that Lindbeck was getting a late start at the ripe old age of 61: ” If you were elected you…wouldn’t be chairman of anything for 20 years, and you are a little long in the tooth for that.” He left it alone that Lindbeck was conflating him with former Sen. Mark Begich, whose only bill ever passed was to name a post office. Of the 77 bills that Young has gotten passed, not one named a post office or courthouse.

“I do work with everyone,” Young added, offering as proof that he is one of the top four lawmakers in Congress for getting legislation passed.

FIXING IT FOR THE UNION

A theme Lindbeck returns to time and again in his campaign is Alyeska Pipeline Service Company’s inking of a 10-year deal with Louisiana shipbuilder Edison Chouest to escort tugs in Prince William Sound. Lindbeck is upset that Young did not intervene and keep the contract with Crowley.

However, Crowley did not bid on the contract when it came up for renewal. It’s a contract it had held for decades.

Lindbeck has made that grievance a centerpiece of his campaign. “This is Alaska oil going through Alaska waters. We cannot make our economy stronger if we outsource the jobs to other companies. I will stand up for Alaska workers.”

Edison Chouest is based in Galliano, La. fully 600 miles closer to Alaska than Jacksonville, Fla., where Crowley is headquartered.

The matter really boiled down to this: Edison Chouest is a nonunion shop. Crowley is union. Lindbeck won the support of the union representing the Crowley workers.

IF THEY VISIT, THEY’LL UNDERSTAND US

Lindbeck offered that the way to get federal cooperation is to make sure that decision makers in DC understand Alaska. He would bring other representatives and officials to see the state for themselves, as then they would understand the size and potential for resource development.

Without acknowledging the irony, he mentioned the John Sturgeon case is an example of how federal officials should have helped a stranded hunter get safely home, rather than cite him for navigating a river in his air boat.

Of course, having federal officials on the ground in Alaska did little to help curb their appetite for overreach in the Sturgeon case, when Park Service officers harassed rather than aided a hunter, but Rep. Young let the opportunity pass to slap at Lindbeck’s logic. He didn’t need to: The audience already had identified the cognitive dissonance.

NO PEBBLE FOR LINDBECK

Finding the proposed Pebble Project the “wrong mine in the wrong place,” Lindbeck waffled on the proposed Donlin Mine, saying he would be interested to know if the local people think Donlin is the right project for them: “We’ll wait and see what the people of Southwest Alaska decide,” he said.

Donlin has received little of the negative attention that Pebble received, possibly because the proposed mine is on Native-owned land, while Pebble is on state-owned land. Environmental groups may be averse to taking on a Native corporation for political reasons. The mining project is located in the Calista Region and has one of the largest known undeveloped gold deposits in the world.

Young said that federal permitting roadblocks and overreach, such as the Environmental Protection Agency pre-emptively ending the permitting process on Pebble, is a deterrent for investment in Alaska. That likely was the position of 99 percent of the audience at the Resource Development Council.

CLOSING THE SALE

In his opening statement, Lindbeck said, “I come to you as an Alaskan Democrat, in that order. I will work with whoever it takes to get things done on behalf of our state. As you can imagine, I will be taking issue with my party on some issues.” He supports opwning the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge to hydrocarbon development. He supports Outer Continental Shelf drilling. He supports mining, but not the Pebble mine. He wants enough timber harvest in the Tongass National Forest to keep a small industry alive.

In his closing statement, Lindbeck was gracious in thanking the organizations for the opportunity to debate, while Rep. Young passionately asked the audience for their vote:

“This is about the Congress, and whether we have a freshman or a senior, a fighter or a beginner,” he said. “I’m the one who will speak up and has done the job and will do the job. I’ve still got the fire. Alaska is my home, and Alaska is my pride. I will fight for you side by side. I’ve put my hands in traps, I have been somewhat aggressive at times. But I do it because I believe I am the best person for this job all the time.”

“I am your fighter and because of that I believe you will vote for me,” Young said. “I do it because of my friendship, my compatibility, and yes sometimes as I mentioned, I’m different. I am a fighter. I’ve always been, I always will be. I’ll never give up. Perserverance overcomes intelligence and I’m a classic example of that.”