Monday, September 1, 2025
Home Blog Page 1598

The election of a predator

11

WHAT DEMOCRATS DID TO GET DEAN WESTLAKE IN OFFICE

The Alaska Democratic Party was successful beyond its wildest dreams in 2016.

Campaign operative John-Henry Heckendorn had delivered: Dean Westlake beat incumbent Rep. Ben Nageak by eight votes. That was what they needed in order to flip the House of Representatives.

The Alaska Democrat machine hired Heckendorn, who had been the communication director for the Alaska Democratic Party and had launched the Ship Creek Group, to bring home the seat in District 40 for them.

Heckendorn partnered with Jim Lottsfeldt, a Democrat lobbyist who runs numerous independent expenditure groups to help Democrats, and who owns MidnightSunAk, a blog that he finds useful to his Democrat and union clients.

Although they had to defend a fraudulent 2016 primary election in court, the Democrats, Heckendorn, and the Division of Elections made it work.

WHY DID DEMOCRATS EAT THEIR OWN?

Nageak, a moderate Democrat from Barrow, had caucused with the Republicans, as rural Democrats often do. Political parties don’t take kindly to their members caucusing with the opposition. (Republicans are now dealing with the same problem with Reps. Louise Stutes, Gabrielle LeDoux, and Paul Seaton).

Rep. Ben Nageak

Everyone loved Bennie on both sides of the aisle. He was the head of the House Natural Resources Committee, important to his district. Nageak had to be beat in order for the Democrats to take over the House.

It was nothing personal — this was just politics.

The obvious choice to replace him was the man who had run for the seat in 2014 — Dean Westlake of Kiana and Kotzebue. He had come within striking distance. He had name recognition.

And he had a problem. He was a known predator. He had a history of domestic violence. He had impregnated a 15-year-old girl while he was a police officer. Democrats knew about at least some of the problems — they’re all over the court records. Others were widely known in Kotzebue and Kiana. In the small towns and villages, women knew.

But that didn’t matter. Kay Brown, then executive director of the Alaska Democratic Party, did not listen to locals any more than she listened to the majority of Alaska Democrats who said they wanted Bernie Sanders for president, rather than Hillary Clinton. Casey Steinau, the chair of the party, ignored local objections to Westlake as well.

Kay Brown

Earlier this month a woman who worked for the Alaska Democratic Party in 2016 castigated party leaders for not listening to the locals in that race.

Olivia Garrett said that local Democrats told Anchorage Democrats about Westlake, “but you don’t listen,” she said. She described how, since he had been in office, Westlake had harassed at least eight women, including herself, “and there probably are more.”

Westlake was forced out of office this week after allegations started piling up on him. His resignation letter is here.

ACTORS WHO PLAYED A ROLE IN WESTLAKE VICTORY

Anchorage Democrats took the lead. Hiring John-Henry Heckendorn’s Ship Creek Group, and with an independent expenditure group financed by people like Gov. Walker’s surrogate Robin Brena and the AFL-CIO’s Vince Beltrami, the Democrats set out to defeat Nageak.

He was hard to defeat because his only fault was caucusing with Republicans, but they made that a capital offense.

Hosting the Anchorage fundraiser for Westlake on the expansive lawns of the Brena estate were Democratic Party regulars: Mark Begich, Casey Steinau (chair of Alaska Democrats), Kay Brown (executive director), Stephen Blanchett, Colin McDonald, Agatha Erickson, Kate Consenstein, Chris Tuck (then Democratic House minority leader), and other Democratic legislators: Les Gara, Andy Josephson, Harriet Drummond, Geran Tarr, Sam Kito, Adam Wool, Scott Kawasaki, and Ivy Spohnholz.

Mark Begich campaigned for Dean Westlake in 2016.Westlake’s harassment problems were well-known in District 40.

Also cohosting were union representatives Joelle Hall, Tom Wescott, Joey Merrick, plus names readers will recognize from their Begich connections: Forrest Dunbar, Eric Croft, David Ramsuer, Susanne Fleek, Schawna Thoma, and Elvi Gray-Jackson.

Democrat Rep. Les Gara, wrote this in 2016: “Whether you’re from rural or urban Alaska, we are all in this together. A better legislature helps us all! I’m joining friends from Western Alaska and Northwest Alaska to help.”

[Read: Governor targets Nageak through surrogate hit squad]

The Division of Election helped, too. In places like Shungnak, election workers made sure that everyone — especially Democrats — voted two ballots in the primary. That way they could vote for Sen. Lisa Murkowski on the Republican ballot and still vote the Democrat ballot.

In Buckland, an anomaly occurred that had an excessive number of “personal representative” ballots being cast — as though a disease had somehow raced through the community and everyone had to send their ballots in via a couple of Democratic activists. More personal representative ballots were cast in Buckland, population 426, than in all of Wasilla.

Lieutenant Gov. Byron Mallott called the election a success. Must Read Alaska begged to differ, calling it fraud.

[Read: Unbelievable: Byron Mallott declares election a success]

[Read: Voter fraud suspected in District 40]

The Alaska Republican Party sued over the result, and won in the first round in Superior Court.

The Democrats brought in Heckendorn as their expert witness for Alaska rural elections. Although he had only been in the state a few years, he told the court he had spent a lot of time traveling District 40, putting up signs, and he was sure that the people of Shungnak favored Westlake. He had spreadsheets, although on cross-examination he admitted that the numbers added up wrong.

[Read: John-Henry Heckendorn for the defense]

Lt. Gov. Byron Mallott appealed the ruling, saying, “We are disappointed that the Superior Court ruled that a poll worker error in Shungnak was sufficient to change the outcome of the House District 40 Primary Election. We have already appealed the ruling to the Alaska Supreme Court. We want absolute clarity on the issues involved and will follow whatever measures the Supreme Court deems appropriate in order to secure a fair election for the two Democratic legislative candidates in House District 40.”

Republicans were able to mount only a head-fake challenge — they didn’t have the money to take it all the way. The Division of Election prevailed and certified the election for Westlake.

“We believe all voters in rural Alaska should be able to vote in a legal election,” said Tuckerman Babcock, of the Alaska Republican Party, in September of 2016. “And we have provided the Division of Elections with appropriate remedies for solving the problems that the Division created when it allowed illegal voting to occur. Not only in Shungnak, but in the Barrow precincts as well, the process was so flawed that no one knows how the people really voted.

“[Casey] Steinau says the people of District 40 have spoken. Well, the voters tried, but the Division of Elections messed up. Many voters were confused, told they could not vote when the law said they could, and even voted twice when they should have voted once. It’s stunning that the chair of the Democratic Party would want her favored candidate to win so badly that she openly endorses illegal voting,” Babcock said after the court’s decision went for Westlake.

Rep. Dean Westlake escorts Gov. Bill Walker to the podium for his 2017 State of the State address, with Sen. Tom Begich. (Photo from Westlake’s newsletter).

THE DEMOCRATS’ COVER-UP

As a legislator, Westlake was known for drinking parties in his office. And he was known to say lascivious things to women.

Last March, Olivia Garrett filed a complaint against Westlake. She gave her letter, addressed to House Majority Leader Chris Tuck and House Speaker Bryce Edgmon, to Tuck, who had coached her on how to word it. Tuck, she thought, was going to take care of it quietly and counsel Westlake to behave.

Garrett, then an aide to Rep. Scott Kawasaki, was out on a limb by herself, and waiting months, while no action was taken. She finally quit the Legislature.

What did the Democrats do in the meantime? They ginned up a whisper campaign against Sen. David Wilson of Wasilla, and suckered the media into following that story, which had never had an actual complaint filed, all the while sitting on a letter accusing Westlake of real harassment.

 

Amory Lelake, legislative aide to Speaker Bryce Edgmon, with Westlake earlier this year. Lelake became the central figure in a whisper campaign against Sen. David Wilson, which ended in his exoneration this month.

 

The Democrats also went after Rep. David Eastman for saying that women in rural Alaska were using pregnancies to get to the city for abortions. They demanded an apology from him. The media could not get enough of this story and Democrats used it to consume days of legislative time last spring.

While Edgmon was expressing outrage toward Eastman over his comments, he was quietly sitting on a very credible complaint he had about Westlake over groping.

Cynically, Westlake even signed the letter demanding an apology from Eastman:

[Read: While ginning up fake accusations, Edgmon’s posse sat on a secret]

This month, the jig was up. Garrett blew the lid on Democratic leaders who had to have Westlake prowling the halls of the Capitol, preying on women. She told all.

The Alaska Democrats called on Westlake to resign. Westlake refused.

On Friday, reporter Liz Raines of KTVA brought the final death blow to Westlake’s ascent. She reported that as a 28-year-old police officer, Westlake fathered a child with a 15-year-old.

That would be rape. Westlake knew the story was coming. He huddled with a few political operatives in Anchorage. And then he resigned.

Raines’ story is here.

JUSTICE DENIED

Today, those who rallied around Westlake in 2016 are nowhere to be found for him. Those who called him a friend are busy scrubbing their Facebook feeds of any mention of the man.

Heckendorn, who brought Westlake into office, is now the defacto campaign manager for Gov. Bill Walker, and is on the state payroll as his “special assistant”.

[Read: Governor beefs up campaign staff on public dime]

What happens to District 40’s representation now? The Democrats from District 40 will offer the governor three names, and he will pick one to serve out Westlake’s term. They won’t offer Ben Nageak, who lost the fraudulent election by only eight votes and very probably won it but for the Mallott-sanctioned fraud.

He or she will likely be a reliable Democrat vote, something that Westlake might not have been and Nageak was certainly not.

As reported this week in Must Read Alaska, a source that has asked not to be identified said Westlake may have been blackmailed with the March complaint that had been filed with Reps. Edgmon and Tuck.

Westlake had become noticeably paranoid after March of 2017, and told people that Tuck was watching him. And he quickly switched his vote on HB 111, oil tax legislation, to line up with his party. When asked, he held his finger to his head as though he had a gun pointed at him. He said he had not choice.

No investigation of Speaker Edgmon, House Majority Leader Tuck, or Rep. Kawasaki has been launched to determine why they buried the allegations against Westlake and allowed him to continue to prey on women in Juneau.

He’s done: Westlake letter of resignation

4

Here is the letter of resignation submitted by Rep. Dean Westlake today.

Honorable Bryce Edgmon
Speaker of the House of Representatives State Capitol Room 208
Juneau AK, 99801

December 15, 2017

Mr. Speaker,

Over the past few days, I have heard from colleagues, constituents, and friends who have continued to advise me on how to address recent events and the allegations against me. I have spent time deliberating on their guidance, and it is with a heavy heart that I respond now and announce that I will be resigning as a member of the Alaska State Legislature.

I ran for office to serve my district, my home, and my community. I wanted to be an advocate for the people whom I care so much about and make positive changes on their behalf.

As recent allegations of my behavior have superseded discussions about my constituents, my ability to serve them has been diminished. The conversation about my behavior has been elevated above the needs of my district, and that is not why I ran for office. I am not more important than the people who put me in my seat. My district has, and always should, come first.

Some people are angry with me; more are disappointed. I am too. To the women who came forward, thank you for telling your story. I am inspired by your bravery, and I am sorry for the pain I have caused. To my constituents, I am sorry to havelet you down. These allegations do not reflect who I am, nor who I want to be. I will learn from this experience and be a better man because of it.

It has been a privilege to work alongside my many amazing colleagues, and I am proud of the work we have been able to accomplish. But much more than that, it has been the greatest honor to serve you, the residents of House District 40.

As a citizen, I will work tirelessly to earn back your trust and esteem and act as an activist. Together, we can continue to tackle the many problems that lie before us as both a region and a state.

Thank you for your support, guidance, and trust.

Dean Westlake

While ginning up fake accusations against a senator, Edgmon’s posse sat on a secret

National Geographic’s cynical polar bear play

Last week, the venerated National Geographic organization posted a video of what is evidently a starving polar bear, with yellowed fur and a bony frame, wandering around Somerset Island, Canada in search of food.

The social media world was aghast.

“This is horrible!” people intoned. “What have we done?” they asked Facebook friends, looking for answers from the mob. “This is living proof of our demise… So so cruel!”

All of a sudden, everyone was an expert.

There’s little doubt that bear was a goner, and his death scene was excrutiating. The piano and cello music that accompanies the footage made akin to the death of Mimi in La Boheme.

However, the timing for the release of that video was curious, and the fact that an environmental activist group (SeaLegacy) was responsible for it is not an accident.

SeaLegacy states its mission is “to create high-impact visual communications that propel people to take action to protect our oceans.” They went to the Arctic to document climate change impacts and they stumbled on a doozy.

Some of the organization’s work is positively stunning. And some, like this video, is downright misleading.

 

THE CLEVER TIMING 

The footage was taken in July, but not released until December.

“This is what climate change looks like,” the caption reads, at about the 10-second mark. The captions continue, saying that shrinking sea ice is causing this starvation.

But just as the opening of the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge for oil and gas exploration was moving into congressional conference committee last week, National Geographic decided that now is the time to roll out the video?

It was a hail Mary pass for the vast environmental industry. They were even fact-checked by Snopes.com, and the organization declared the video “True.”

Inuit hunters fact-checked it and come up with a different viewpoint.

The Inuit in Canada are likely the world experts on polar bears, and they not only pushed back at SeaLegacy’s assertions.

“Climate change has very little to do with it,” said Eric Ootoovak, vice-chair of the Mittimatalik Hunters and Trappers Organization on Baffin Island. “You can really tell he’s sick. He’s not starving. If he was starving, he’d be able to move a bit more than that.”

Baffin Island hunters have been monitoring polar bear populations for generations — long before the bears became the poster-child animals for global warming.

“There’s too many bears in our area,” Ootoovak said, adding that they are becoming a menace to people. “My grandmother used to tell me stories from when they lived in sod houses and they would never see polar bears. When there was finally a bear, people all over spoke about it. Today, it’s impossible to camp without having a bear watch.”

[Read: The problem with polar bear propaganda]

But SeaLegacy doubled down on the hunters:

“Inuit people make a lot of money from polar bear trophy hunting,” SeaLegacy co-founder Cristina Mittermeier told CBC radio. “Of course it is in their best interest to say that polar bears are happy and healthy and that climate change is a joke, because otherwise their quota might be reduced.”

The July video was captured by SeaLegacy filmmakers on Somerset Island, near Baffin Island in Nunavut, where they were shooting a documentary about the effects of climate change.

Scientists with a contrary view have been largely ignored. The IUCN Polar Bear Specialist Group says the global population of polar bears is between 22,000 and 30,000.

One thing is certain: Polar bears are at the top of the food chain with no natural predators other than an occasional Inuit hunter. They are more likely to die of old age and age-related diseases than other species, such as whales, which are harvested or whose lifespans are even more difficult to document.

The population of polar bears appears to be increasing in some areas, while decreasing in others.

A 2016 scientific working group report on the Baffin Bay and Kane Basin polar bear populations was released in February, and confirmed what local Inuit have been saying: The populations are stable. The report received scant coverage from the media.

[Read the report on Baffin Bay and Kane Basin polar bear population trends here.]

Yet with cameras and polyester puff jackets, environmental propagandists will continue to descend on the Arctic.  In the name of storytelling, they will document a lot more of these deaths — natural or otherwise — in their effort to warn us all of an apocalyptic future where zombie polar bears roam the tundra and chew on the rubber seats of snow machines for sustenance, while cello music plays in the background.

A sign that Begich isn’t running for governor

7

WALKER CRACKS OPEN UNION SUPPORT

One of the favorite dinner party conversations among politicos this season is whether or not former Sen. Mark Begich is going to make a run for governor of Alaska.

On Aug. 25, Begich was certainly still in the hunt. In a letter to his supporters he wrote: “I wanted to let you know that in response to many urging me to run, I am considering it, but Deborah and I have not made a decision yet. I hope to make a decision and share that with you in the next few months. In the meantime, I ask that you keep your powder dry.

“As I think about this decision, I’d love to hear from you. Should I or shouldn’t I run for Governor? Do you think Alaska is on the right path? What are your biggest hopes and concerns for our future?”

We may never know what answer Begich received, but a fundraiser for Gov. Bill Walker and Lt. Gov. Byron Mallott just a few weeks later was flush with people one would expect to be at a Begich fundraiser — Jane Anvik and Vic Fisher, Barbara and Hal Gazaway, Bruce Botelho, Diane Kaplan. You know, the usual suspects.

Some of those keeping their powder dry in September are now all in on a fundraiser the Walker-Mallott ticket that the campaign will hold on Dec. 18 at the home of former Gov. Bill Sheffield.

They are the union representatives. They were nowhere to be seen during the governor’s first few fundraisers. But they are part of the Walker party now.

Alaska AFL-CIO President Vince Beltrami, center, is joined by AFL-CIO President Richard Trumka, at a labor protest against the Anchorage Hilton and Sheraton Hotels in this 2012 file photo.

Vince Beltrami is on board with Gov. Walker once again. He’s head of AFL-CIO in Alaska and was instrumental in Walker’s first win, cobbling together the slate of Walker and Mallott.

Tom Wescott, head of the firefighters’ union, has now thrown his support to Walker.

Joey Merrick, business manager for Laborers’ Local 341, has joined the co-host list.

Alaska Democrats, tired of losing, gave up having a gubernatorial candidate in 2014, and it worked out well for them. They have control the Governor’s Office, and now the House of Representatives, which they took control of by running “independents.” It worked beyond their wildest dreams.

But would Democrats really go for two election cycles without having someone from their party run for governor, especially when Begich appears eager to jump in? Walker seems to have convinced the Democrats to stick with him for another cycle.

Walker’s fundraiser next week is co-hosted by mostly the same people who hosted his September fundraiser. Overall, the list boasts fewer names.

A few new co-hosts, like former Rep. Jim Colver, appear, but one name is conspicuously absent from the invitation: Rep. Dean Westlake, who was supported by Walker and his key surrogate lawyer Robin Brena, but who is now under attack by his own party for sexual harassment. Westlake was a co-host in September, but not this time.

Brena’s name is not on the list, although he’s surely working on a parallel effort to elect Walker-Mallott through an independent expenditure group.

Has Begich decided not to run? Has Walker promised Democrats he will run in their primary? Both of those seem more likely this week, with the unions coming over.

YOUR INVITE

Here’s the invitation for the Dec. 18 fundraiser, and the co-hosts who are no longer keeping their powder dry for Begich. (Compare it to the September list here):

Slow Obamacare enrollments head into final day

0

SURGE WEEK

This week is the home stretch for signing up for Obamacare for 2018. The enrollment period ends Friday, Dec. 15.

Health care experts are now saying enrollment will be down by 18.5 percent from last year.

Find out more about enrolling in a health care plan here.

So far, Alaska (population 740,000) has the lowest number of people enrolled in the nation, at 10,633. The next lowest is Delaware, with a population of 950,000 and an Obamacare enrollment of 11,553, as of Dec. 9.

TOTAL ALASKA ENROLLED TRENDS 

2016 = 23,029
2017 = 19,145
2018 – 15,600 (projected by Must Read Alaska)

Number of Alaskans enrolled as of Dec. 9: 10,633

Oddly, Alaska enrollments to date actually appear 22 percent higher than last year, according to the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services. That is likely due to a shortened six-week open enrollment period, compared to 12 weeks last year.

EFFECTUATED ENROLLMENT (ENROLLED & PAID FIRST MONTH PREMIUM)

Enrolling in health care is one thing, but paying for it and having it actually cover you is another. Many enrollees drop out of coverage before they pay their first premium. Cost is a factor: Alaskans pay some of the highest premiums in the nation.

Here’s where the real Alaska enrollment numbers come in:

2016 = 15,252 effectuated
2017 = 14,177 effectuated
2018 = 10,800 +- (effectuated, projected by Must Read Alaska)

Republican lawmakers will overturn the mandate to purchase insurance, a cornerstone of the Affordable Care Act, which passed with only Democrats voting for it.

As it stands, the law now requires all to have insurance or pay a fine. This portion of Obamacare hits small businesses and sole proprietors hard, since they typically do not have company-provided health care plan. Many Alaskans report premiums and deductibles that are more than their home mortgages, such as this example sent to Must Read Alaska.

The Internal Revenue Service has announced the fines will be enforced when people file their taxes between Jan. 1-April 16, 2018. The release of that fine would not go into effect until the following year, unless something changes.

The tax bill now being worked out in a congressional conference committee between the House and Senate has the end of the individual mandate written into it.

While ginning up fake accusations against a senator, Edgmon’s posse sat on a secret

7

SEN. WILSON WAS A CONVENIENT DISTRACTION FROM WESTLAKE

On June 15, 2017, Sen. David Wilson engaged in what amounted to a verbal dispute with an aide who stood at the door of the House Speaker’s Chambers in Alaska’s Capitol.

Behind the door, a caucus meeting was being held, with loud music playing.

Wilson pretended to record the music through the door. The aide told him to move along. It all happened in a few short seconds in full view of at least two members of the media, including Liz Raines of KTVA, and James Brooks of the Juneau Empire. Other people were in the hall, as they are during sessions.

Over the course of several months, a whisper campaign started from the Democratic side of the aisle, and Wilson, a Republican, was being accused of sexually harassing the aide. It was all done via rumor — no complaint has ever been filed against Wilson in this matter. No complaint needed to be filed, as the media would provide death by a thousand cuts.

[Read: Much ado about up-skirting-possible-lawsuit]

After the encounter, the Speaker’s legislative aide appeared to want nothing to do with the allegations, and neither she nor the Speaker filed a complaint.

They also didn’t deny the rumors.

By fall, two members of the media reported that Wilson had placed a camera-phone under the skirt of the aide, and that rumor took off like a rocket.

Those reporters, James Brooks of the Juneau Empire, and Liz Raines of KTVA, went on record.

Brooks was quoted by Raines in her story: “What I saw was David Wilson, Sen. Wilson, as I remember it, approaching the door and appearing to listen in or act like he was listening in. I couldn’t hear any conversations or I don’t remember them. At that point, a staffer came up and physically stood in front of the door and blocked him from coming up. At that point, he took his cell phone and appeared to press it against the door between the staffer’s legs. It didn’t seem like there was anything malicious in it. It came and went pretty quickly.”

Raines had given her account to Senate President Pete Kelly and House Speaker Bryce Edgmon.

BUT IT DIDN’T HAPPEN LIKE THAT

We now know that the truth eventually got on its shoes and tried to catch up with the rumor.

The official report, released this week, debunks the reporters’ account. Skiff Lobaugh, in charge of personnel for the Legislative Affairs Agency, reviewed the video tape of the hallway encounter and described it this way as he put to rest the false allegations:

  • Senator Wilson was in front of the Speaker’s Office talking with HSE on June 15, 2017.
  • HSE moved to stand between Senator Wilson and the door to the Speaker’s Office.
  • Senator Wilson took out what appears to be a cellphone.
  • Senator Wilson lowered the cellphone to a height level with the hemline of HSE skirt, at a distance of about one foot to two feet away from the skirt.
  • Senator Wilson did not physically touch HSE or her skirt with his hand or his cellphone.
  • The cellphone was angled towards both the HSE’s skirt and the door of the Speaker’s Office The door was directly behind the HSE. Senator Wilson was looking at the phone at this time, not at HSE or the door.
  • The cellphone was at skirt level for four seconds. The cellphone was lowered at 4:58:19 pm and raised at 4:58:23 pm.
  • Something was said, and Senator Wilson left the area. He headed towards the Senate side of the Capitol.

EDGMON LET LEDOUX DO HIS DIRTY WORK

Speaker Edgmon allowed Rep. Gabrielle LeDoux, the Rules Committee chair, to be the attack dog, and she was eager:

“The Senate needs to figure out what to do with this guy,” said LeDoux on camera, with righteous indignation, irritated that Senate President Pete Kelly had called for a review and strengthening of harassment policies. That was going to be her play, and Kelly messed up her plans to shame Wilson and the Senate leadership.

Reporter Liz Raines, right, continued to report on the story to which she had become a central witness. Her account of what happened between David Wilson and legislative aide Amory LeLake has been refuted by an official investigation. Here, she interviews House Rules Chair Gabrielle LeDoux, who gave credence to the accusations.

“It’s one thing to write letters about this, but right now, the Senate is protecting exactly a person who did that, and I am referring to Sen. David Wilson, you know, the guy who hit the reporter, who is alleged to have stuck a telephone between a staffer’s legs,” LeDoux told reporter Raines, who continued to report on the story to which she had become central.

At the time, it seemed Wilson didn’t stand a chance against the account of the reporters.

LEDOUX CONTINUES ATTACK

Rep. LeDoux took over the lead role in the attack against Wilson, while Speaker Edgmon and Majority Leader Tuck remained silent for months:

“They’ve [the Senate leadership] sent a letter [to ask for strengthening policies], but they haven’t bothered to do anything when one of their own members apparently acted inappropriately. It’s one thing to send letters; it’s another thing to do something,” Rep. Gabrielle LeDoux told the Empire.

Her idea of doing something was to continue to attack Wilson.

“In deference to the victim — I’m not going to mention the victim’s name — but there have been rumors in this building about an incident which occurred … in June involving David Wilson, Sen. Wilson,” LeDoux continued, as she played judge and jury, trying Sen. Wilson in the court of public opinion. She had a victim card, even if there was no victim.

The media was a willing partner. The House Democrats, with LeDoux in front, played them like a fiddle.

But then, something happened that the Democrats perhaps did not see coming: Legislative aide Olivia Garrett had had enough.

EDGMON, TUCK, KAWASAKI WERE SITTING ON A SECRET

While Sen. Wilson fought for his reputation, repeatedly denying allegations, Speaker Edgmon and Tuck knew something that Republicans in the Senate and House didn’t know:

Months earlier, Garrett, an aide to Rep. Scott Kawasaki, D-Fairbanks, had lodged a complaint against Rep. Dean Westlake, D-Kotzebue.

Dean Westlake

Garrett in early March had gone to Majority Leader Tuck and told him of the harassment she had been subjected to by Westlake.

She asked what she should do. Tuck told her to write a letter detailing the complaint. On March 13, she finalized the letter to Edgmon and Tuck, gave the letter to Tuck, and then she waited.

And waited.

Nothing ever came of it. April, May, June, and July went by. The Democrats were ginning up accusations against Sen. Wilson, fueling the media with rumors, and nothing was being done about her actual complaint. She was ignored.

By August, Garrett quit her job. Still no action was taken. In early December, she went public with her accusations.

It’s highly likely that at least three members of the Legislature knew of Garrett’s complaint back in March: Chris Tuck most surely, as he had coached her on how to write the letter, and had received the letter from her; Speaker Edgmon, who has admitted he knew of the complaint in March and was addressed in the letter. It’s also just as plausible that Rep. LeDoux knew.

And then there was Rep. Scott Kawasaki, who was Garrett’s supervisor.

Kawasaki has his own trail of harassment rumors behind him, going back years — taking place in the Capitol and in bars in downtown Juneau.

Surely Kawasaki knew that Garrett was filing a complaint, and yet he, too, remained silent, not advocating for justice for either Garrett or the accused, Rep. Westake.

Edgmon, Tuck, and LeDoux have not apologized to Sen. Wilson for allowing LeDoux to run roughshod over truth and justice. Neither have they apologized to legislative aide Olivia Garrett for ignoring her complaint. Kawasaki has all but disappeared from the public eye.

There appears to be no internal mechanism for bringing charges against the House leadership for complicity and possible collusion in allowing Rep. Westlake to continue harassing women in the Legislature for months after the complaint was filed. This isn’t something Legislative Affairs Agency is likely to do.

History tells us that those in power are not able to investigate themselves for wrongdoing. Who, then, will ask House Speaker Edgmon, House Majority Leader Tuck, Rules Chair LeDoux, and Rep. Kawasaki to take an oath and give a sworn statement about their actions?

Did these House players know of real harassment, and keep silent, while allowing unfounded and ugly accusations to become very public and drawn-out against a member of the Senate? The public may never know.

Quote of the day: Holleman on pedophiles, molesters

5

We give you a social media exchange between Anchorage School Board member Andy Holleman and Forrest McDonald, a campaign consultant (and candidate for House) who gives free advice on a platform for Holleman’s next campaign, (which is “mildly paraphrased” in his sample ad).

Holleman is a reliable liberal vote, while McDonald is conservative, and who is known to have an acerbic wit.

 

 

 

 

 

 

Did Edgmon and Tuck conspire to cover up Westlake complaint?

3

What did they know and when did they know it?

Did the House Speaker and House Majority leader agree to keep a complaint of sexual harassment under wraps? Did the two ever plan to act?

Legislative Affairs is now investigating the original complaint of sexual harassment of a legislative aide by Rep. Dean Westlake. The complaint was made in March, and the agency’s Human Resource Director Skiff Lobaugh is in charge of the report.

But who is investigating why Speaker Bryce Edgmon and House Majority Leader Chris Tuck stuck the complaint letter in a drawer, and left a legislative aide fearing for her job? The aide eventually quit.

There is no investigation into what appears to be a cover-up of something that is, by Alaska Statute, a crime.

THE BACKGROUND

On March 13, legislative aide Olivia Garrett gave a letter to House Majority Leader Chris Tuck, detailing two incidents of harassment from Rep. Dean Westlake.

WHAT WAS TUCK’S ROLE?

Majority Leader Tuck had given Garrett specific guidance on how to write the letter, Garrett said. She followed his advice closely, fearing retaliation from Tuck, who is currently the second-most powerful person in the Alaska House, if she didn’t abide by his instructions, Garrett told KTUU.

Garrett said she especially heeded Tuck’s instructions to write that she wanted to “move forward in a professional manner,” and not “embarrass or damage” anyone.

In other words, Tuck helped her write the letter.

Tuck may or may not have shown the letter to Speaker Bryce Edgmon, although it was addressed to both of them. Edgmon has alternately said he didn’t know about the letter, and that he knew about it in March.

“I wrote the letter, gave Rep. Tuck a hard copy, and never heard from him again,” Garrett told KTUU. Garrett, who was a legislative aide for Rep. Scott Kawasaki during session, left legislative service in August. She has in recent days filed a Human Rights complaint against Westlake.

But did the House Speaker know, and for how long? Tuck isn’t saying what he did with the letter, but Edgmon is now admitting he saw it in March.

“In an interview earlier this week, Edgmon, a Democrat, said he became aware of the complaint in March and spoke with Westlake, a first-term lawmaker from Kotzebue,” the Associated Press reported.

Edgmon earlier said that if there are any substantiated claims of harassment, there should be consequences.

“When I say substantiated, I think it has to go through a full investigation process,” he told a reporter.

[Read: What Edgmon said when the harassment complaint became public.]

But complaints can’t be investigated and substantiated if those in power conspire to keep them secret.

Instead, once the complaint became public, Edgmon and House Democrats immediately called on Westlake to resign. So did the Alaska Democratic Party.

Now, neither Edgmon or Tuck will discuss anything about the case because they say it is now a confidential investigation.

Rep. Colleen Sullivan-Leonard has asked for an independent investigation into the entire matter.

WESTLAKE APOLOGIZES, WON’T QUIT YET

For his part, Rep. Westlake has issued a statement of contrition and apology:

I would have preferred to publicly respond to recent allegations, but I am still in recovery from heart surgery and must make a written statement only. These allegations have become a confidential personnel matter, and in respecting the process I cannot discuss the details. I very much wish that I could. However, I will say the following:

I want to once again apologize to any woman whom I have made uncomfortable with either my actions or words. I never intended to hurt anyone, but I understand now that I have. I am truly sorry for that, and I want to thank anyone who came forward. Doing so required strength and bravery.

In the midst of a national moment that has empowered many women to come forward with their painful experiences, I have found myself re-examining my own actions and thinking through how they have affected the women with whom I work and interact.

I, like many men, have learned a lot from the women who have shared their stories over the past few weeks. I used to think of certain actions as friendly or funny, but I have come to understand that they can be offensive and intrusive.

I am imperfect, and I know I have disappointed many people who trusted me to represent them. Let me be clear, I am committed to being better and to changing my behavior. I will learn from this experience, and I will be an ally and supporter of women moving forward.

Many people in the past few days have called for me to resign. I have thought seriously about it, and I have asked for counsel from friends, family, native leaders, Elders, and God. I have decided not to.

I am proud to represent House District 40, which is not a Republican or Democrat district- it is an Alaskan district. I will continue to work on behalf of the people of my district and of Alaska more broadly.

I want to thank everyone who has supported me throughout this time. These stories do not reflect who I am, and I am determined to make it right.

Power play: House members set up own harassment reporting system

 

 

Power play: House members set up own harassment reporting system

1

REP. MILLETT SAYS MEMBERS NOW DON’T TRUST SPEAKER, DUE TO INACTION

House Minority Leader Charisse Millett today announced that because Speaker Bryce Edgmon and House Majority Leader Chris Tuck have shown an inability to properly handle accusations of sexual harassment, she has assigned two members of her caucus as “Harassment Resource Officers.” Call it a safety net, if you will, just in case this ever happens again.

House Minority Leader Rep. Charisse Millett

 “In light of the recent deficiencies displayed in our current policies regarding reporting procedures and process, I am designating Representatives [Jennifer] Johnston and [Dave] Talerico inside our caucus as ‘Harassment Resource Officers”.- Rep. Charisse Millett

Reps. Johnston and Talerico will get training in how to handle reports of harassment, and Millett said.

The “displayed incompetence of the current Speaker of House, his leadership group, including the Majority Leader and Rules Chair,” have resulted in a lack of trust by their fellow lawmakers and legislative employees, who learned through the media that a report of sexual harassment was kept secret by Edgmon and Tuck for nine months.

On March 13, the two were notified by former legislative aide Olivia Garrett of sexual harassment she endured from Rep. Dean Westlake. The letter to the two was never acted on, and the aide, who quit working for the House in August, finally made the letter public through KTVA this month after she went public with her accusations in front of a “truth and reconciliation” meeting of the Alaska Democratic Party.

Speaker Edgmon has told the media he cannot speak about the matter because it is private, and he has not revealed what action, if any, he took once informed of the harassment.

“This is a confidential personnel issue and I am not able to comment on details of the incident or the complaint,” he said in a statement. “Unwanted sexual advances and other forms of harassment are unacceptable and hinder the work of the Alaska Legislature to do the people’s business. Any victim who comes forward must be respected and should know their concerns will be heard, investigated, and addressed with fairness and transparency. Our priority is to ensure a safe and respectful work environment where no one feels threatened. We strongly encourage anyone who has been subjected to sexual harassment, assault, or aggravation in or related to their place of work to come forward. We want them to feel confident that their personnel matters will remain confidential and private, and that the Legislature will listen and follow through.”

However, the Associated Press is reporting that Edgmon knew of the letter from the aide back in March.

Tuck has remained silent about why he didn’t act on the letter he was given on March 13, which detailed the harassment accusations. Rules Chair Gabrielle LeDoux has also remained mum on the matter, and is believed to be in Cuba.

LEGISLATIVE STAFFERS OFFER THEORY

Several legislative staff members, speaking on the condition of anonymity, have offered the theory that Edgmon, Tuck and LeDoux were using the letter as a form of blackmail against Westlake, to ensure he voted for higher tax rates on oil companies. Westlake comes from a district that depends on oil for its economy and ran on a pro-oil platform. But in early April, his behavior changed and he began acting “paranoid.” He suddenly had a change of heart on oil taxes and on April 10 voted with the Democrats on HB 111. That bill passed the House 21-19 along party lines. Westlake’s vote was essential to its passage.

A call to Westlake for comment was not returned. He is said to be recovering from a surgical procedure on his heart and not available. But he has issued a statement saying that he does not plan to resign his position, even though House Democrats and the Alaska Democratic Party have called on him to resign.

PARALLEL REPORTING STRUCTURE CREATED

Reps. Jennifer Johnston and Dave Talerico

Rep. Johnston and Talerico “will be empowered to receive reports and assist in referring concerns and incidents to the Legislative Affairs Agency’s Personnel Office and Human Resources Manager. They are both committed to taking all reports seriously, without partisan or personal biases,” Millett said in a statement. “These officer positions are not meant to take the place of any existing reporting tools or channels, simply to supplement the Legislature’s current policies, and add to any forthcoming revisions to those policies.”

“All members and staff deserve to feel safe coming to work, and to feel that their reports will prompt action – not fall on deaf ears. Please contact my office, along with Representatives Johnston and Talerico, with any questions about this policy addition,” Millett said.