Tuesday, May 13, 2025
Home Blog Page 1548

Heads and Tails: Walker’s whirlwind campaign trips, Dispatch employee hosts fundraiser

CAMPAIGNING ON THE PUBLIC DIME? Gov. Bill Walker has been making the rounds in Kodiak, Kotzebue, and Bethel of late. And he’s traveling with an entourage.

In fact, nearly his entire cabinet went to Bethel with him. The cost of a trip like that has been in the works for weeks, and the cost to the public won’t be known for weeks, but with 14 of his core team plus security detail, it’s well over $20,000.

Walker signed a bill in a careful photograph that had only children in sight, and convened his cabinet behind closed doors in Bethel. Governor Walker, Lieutenant Governor Byron Mallott, and the Cabinet also hosted a community reception for Bethel residents.

Bethel is the hometown of Commissioner of Health and Social Services Valerie “Nurr’araaluk” Davidson. Davidson is reported to spend her summers in Bethel.

“I’m very pleased Lt. Governor Mallott, our commissioners, and I had the chance to engage with students in Bethel today and hear residents’ concerns,” Governor Walker said. “Convening the Cabinet in Bethel has been a goal of mine, and I thank the community for the warm reception. Hearing from Alaskans across the state keeps us all engaged and grounded, and equips us to continue pulling together for our state.”

There’s that, plus the fact that he had filed for re-election just a week prior.

ZINKE INVESTIGATION DROPPED: The Interior Department’s inspector general dropped its investigation into a reported phone call in late July from Zinke to Sen. Lisa Murkowski and Sen. Dan Sullivan telling them there would be dire consequences for Alaska due to Murkowski’s obstruction of Obamacare reform.

Evidently both senators refused to participate in the investigation over the content of those calls, so Interior Deputy Inspector General Mary Kendall said she was pulling the plug.

DISPATCH CHIEF NOW CO-HOSTING FUNDRAISER FOR WALKER: Two and a half years ago, one of the top managers of the Alaska Dispatch News was fired by owner Alice Rogoff because she had accepted a position on the Mayor Ethan Berkowitz transition team. Oddly, Rogoff announced the firing to a room full of business leaders at a Chamber of Commerce meeting.

“Our executive vice president for advertising is no longer with us. She became close to the Berkowitz campaign and is now a member of that transition team. It crossed a line that to me is … the appearance is somehow associated with our newspaper. we will never be active in political campaigns,” Rogoff told the group on May 21, 2015.

But now, the remaining titular executive vice president Dispatch, Margy Johnson, is cohosting a fundraiser for her longtime friend Gov. Bill Walker’s re-election.

Word is that Rogoff has asked Johnson to stay on until the newspaper changes hands. As executive vice president, she’s no longer listed in the staff box, but evidently taking a paycheck well into next month to keep an eye on the place for Rogoff. And with one foot out the door, getting onboard with the Walker camp may be a strategic career move.

So much for ADN non-involvement in political campaigns.

SPOTTED: In the Legislative Information Office yesterday, leftist political strategist and owner of the MidnightSunAK blog, Jim Lottsfeldt, who was in Rep. Jason Grenn’s office meeting with his staff.

Lottsfeldt is the money guy behind a new political action committee formed with Outside money to push Grenn’s anti-corruption initiative.

They probably won’t need much money because everyone is against corruption, right?

Here’s the donor list for the Massachusetts-based group that is behind the ballot initiative.

JUSTIN PARISH WANTS INCOME TAX: Juneau’s Rep. Justin Parish is still all-in on an income tax. At a townhall meeting last night, 16 people showed up to hear his pitch for their pocketbook.

“It’s my conviction that we should pay for our government rather than kicking it down the path,” Parish said, as quoted by the Juneau Empire. “I’m convinced, as I was from the time I ran, that the wisest course would be to implement a light income tax.”

And by light, he means those who are still working and haven’t received a raise for two years — and that would be many working in Alaska — would be asked to skim off some of their income so the State of Alaska doesn’t have to reduce the size of its workforce or trim its very generous social welfare programs.

Melania Trump’s stilettos turn critics into heels

2

When Michelle Obama had her first official portrait showing her in a sleeveless dress, the critics clucked that it was inappropriate for her to show her bare arms in a business setting like the White House.

But Politico defended her: “The sleeveless look is very much in keeping with what we’ve seen from Michelle Obama,” said Politico White House reporter Malika Henderson in 2009, writing of the first lady’s attire. “It is very much her signature look, so I wasn’t that surprised.”

Michelle Obama went sleeveless a lot. It was her signature look. By the end of the Obama presidency, she was showing a lot more than arms. She wore the lowest cut gowns of any first lady in photographic history — and no one blinked.

First Lady Melania Trump wears stiletto heels when she leaves the White House. It is her signature look. For a woman of a certain age — and yes, she is 47 — that is devotion to style. By her age, most Alaskan conservative women have chosen function over fashion. But Mrs. Trump is an urbanite, and a pair of XtraTufs have never slouched in her doorway, much less on her feet.

Not good enough for the critics, however. On a day when one of the worst disasters in U.S. history has swamped the Gulf Coast, and when North Korea has launched a missile at Japan, the critics took a break from the serious to criticize the First Footwear.

Politico wrote: “But on Tuesday, she appeared to put the wrong foot forward when she boarded Marine One, en route to visit emergency responders in hurricane-ravaged Texas, wearing towering black snakeskin stilettos.

“The emblematic first image of the first lady heading off to visit a hurricane in heels — a moment that the president has seized on as an opportunity to project strength and show off decisive leadership — instead became another symbol of a White House that can often seem out of touch.”

“On board Air Force One to Corpus Christi, as the picture of the delicate heels ricocheted across the Internet, Melania Trump changed into a pair of bright, white sneakers, which looked fresh out of the box.

Even Sarah Palin’s 2008 campaign stylist jumped in to tut-tut: “it was a mistake in the message it relays. A lot of eyes were on them. They’re going to a devastated area. She should be dressed accordingly.”

For those who lived through the Sarah Palin vice presidential wardrobe controversy, the moral outrage over a pair of high heels while walking to Air Force One is a reminder that there are few women in the public eye who can escape the scathing remarks of the critics.

And like most of the reflexively negative coverage of the Trump presidency, the story is subtly misleading.  It makes much of the heels she wore when boarding the plane, and rather little of the fact that she did not wear them when disembarking in Texas nor while visiting the hurricane damaged areas.

But so far as we know, the notice on the Gov. Bill Walker fundraiser for Sept. 5, which said “No stiletto heels” was not a microaggression against the First Lady.

And just for fun, we are sure it was not an unintentional commentary on the governor’s footwear of late:

Gov. Walker and his aide John-Henry Heckendorn don heels for the “Walk a Mile in Her Shoes” event in April.

Walker’s cohost for his first fundraiser: Lots of liberals on board

13

Mark Begich told his supporters to “keep your powder dry.” He is probably running for governor.

But for the Sept. 5 fundraiser for the re-election of Gov. Bill Walker and Lt. Gov. Byron Mallott, there’s a liberal flair on the co-host list that should make Begich nervous: From Walker’s longtime supporters Malcolm and Cindy Roberts, Margy Johnson (of the Alaska Dispatch News) to Juneauite Bruce Botelho, there are also a good number of die-hard Democrats. But it’s telling that very few Republicans signed on to co-host the event, which is probably the best poll out there for Mark Begich: Walker is carving out a piece of the Left. The event is being held at the home of his cabinet level oil adviser, John Hendrix. “No stiletto heels, please,” usually means they will have it under tents out on the expansive lawns behind their Atwood Estate home that is now known as “The Marilaine.”

 

 

Harvest season includes first full cannabis crop in Alaska

IT’S HIGH TIME TO PICK THAT POT

September is harvest season in Alaska and the fields are getting a haircut, while farmers’ markets in Southcentral are teeming with carrots and kale, potatoes and leeks, and a variety of other vegetables such as mizuna, snow apples, and daikon radish.

But for the first time, there’s a big new crop: Cannabis. Its harvest is well under way. By Sept. 21, the air is just too cold in most parts of Alaska — and the ground too — to do the plants any good. The end of the season for sativa plants has arrived.

With as many as 50 licensed commercial cannabis growers around the state working the short-but-intense Alaska growing season, the fall of 2017 will be the first year when a flush of legally grown Alaska marijuana is harvested.

Proposition 2 passed with the voters in 2015, allowing the growing and selling of marijuana. But that led to a long regulatory process that caused last year to be only a partially productive season for commercial cultivators.

This year, those knowledgeable in the industry predict that as much as 3,000 pounds of finished product will address what has been an undersupply problem that has been keeping pot prices in Alaska, ahem, high.

The marijuana industry has been one of the only job-growth sectors in Alaska’s long recession, which started about the time Gov. Bill Walker took office in 2014.

Each of the commercial growers in the state employ about five people, and with harvest season there is a burst of employment for about 30 people for each of these growers. These “trimmigrants” are skilled workers who understand how to make a bud worth hundreds of dollars.

Trimmers snip small leaves away from the bud and make the appearance as aesthetic as possible, since consumer decisions are highly influenced by the look of the bud. Often trimmers get paid by the pound.

“A good trimmer can make $30 an hour and a bad trimmer can turn $1,000 worth of weed into $500 pretty fast,” said one industry insider. Aesthetics of bud trimming, evidently, is a learned skill.

The harvest continues August through September, with growers walking a fine line to get all the plants harvested before the temperatures get too cold.

Most of the harvest will be done in the Mat-Su Valley, where growers use large “high-tunnel” greenhouse systems. To force the plants to bud before they’d normally be ready, growers induce artificial darkness midway through the season by draping their greenhouses for as much as 12 hours a day. The plants are sensitive to the cycle of the sun.

Because of the cold temperatures setting in, most outdoor growers will get only one harvest per year, but that harvest can be worth millions of dollars.

More than 700 Alaskans are said to be working in the cannabis industry, with cultivators averaging five employees each — and up to 30 during the harvest. With about 30 retail stores now open, each employing 5-10 people, and processing, manufacturing and testing labs employing up to another 100, the marijuana industry is a rare economic bright spot in a state that has the highest unemployment in the nation. That doesn’t count the marketing, packaging, transportation, security, and other spin-off economies.

Some of the jobs in the industry require specialized knowledge and experience, according the Alaska Cannabis Institute:

  • Cannabis cultivators, who need to know about nutrients, growing mediums, light and temperature control, diseases and breeding.
  • Extraction technicians, who manufacture concentrates through the use of dry ice, propane, butane and other hazardous materials.
  • Food preparation, such as candy makers and bakers. An experienced cannabis chef can demand up to $30 an hour.
  • Budtender, like a bartender for cannabis, is the point-of-sales person advising and selling all the products to the consumer. The hourly rate can start at about $15.

SOCIAL CLUBS, CAFES NOW UNDERGOING REGULATORY REVIEW

The next stage of legalized marijuana use is under consideration, which would allow for social clubs or cafes that would operate similar to bars that serve alcoholic beverages.  Regulations to enable such public consumption are under consideration and are currently open to public comment.

It’s a move that been requested by a diverse cross-section of the population — tourism, local government, and consumers have all requested it.

The tourism industry has wanted a solution to tourists buying cannabis and then using hotel rooms or rental cars to consume it. They prefer a licensed establishment where tourists can use product safely. Consumers of pot who rent in pot-free buildings also have been seeking places where they can get high, proponents say.

The Walker Administration has slow-walked this part of the regulatory process, while publicly claiming to support the voter initiative that was Ballot Measure 2. His administration has let the tourism season go by without providing a viable mechanism for tourists to actually consume the pot they buy in Alaska.

However, last week, the State of Alaska posted a notice of a change in regulations that would allow retail licensees to apply for onsite consumption permits.

Under the proposal, the state would allow cannabis buying and consuming on site, either by vaporization or smoking,  in one gram limits. No concentrates would be allowed but pot-laced consumables and pot-free food could be sold. There is a proposed rule that would protect cannabis cafe workers from exposure to marijuana smoke while working.

Comments are being received no later than 4:30 pm, Oct. 27 at the Alcohol & Marijuana Control Office at 550 West 7th Avenue, Suite 1600, Anchorage, AK 99501 and by email at [email protected].

The control board is also taking questions about the changes they propose in these regulations, and people may submit those questions at least 10 days before the end of the public comment period. The agency will aggregate its responses to similar questions and make those available on the Alaska Online Public Notice System.

 

Nome Native corporation sues to remove three directors from board

2

Sitnasuak Native Corporation has filed a lawsuit to remove three of its directors for breaking the law.

The legal move is to preserve election integrity, transparency, and the confidence shareholders have in a corporation that has both profit and cultural preservation as its core missions.

The Nome-based corporation says the three breached their fiduciary duties to Sitnasuak and its shareholders when they coordinated and sent anonymous proxy solicitations to corporation shareholders.

If true that would be a violation of Alaska banking and securities law, and is a felony.

The anonymous proxy mailer misinformed Sitnasuak shareholders and damaged the corporation, the lawsuit alleges. It was sent in advance of the June 3 meeting, which failed to reach a quorum and has been rescheduled to Sept. 30 in Anchorage.

The mailer was sent from “SNC Shareholders for Free Speech” to 1,000 shareholders, and did not identify the persons behind the message that backed candidates Barbara Amarok and Helen Bell, and opposed Jason Evans, who was running for his second term. It also gave the readers false and misleading information regarding voting and how the proxy system works, the lawsuit alleges.

Evans is a newspaper publisher of the Homer Tribune, the Arctic Sounder and the Dutch Harbor Fisherman/Bristol Bay Times, and is part of the business group attempting to purchase the Alaska Dispatch News through the newly formed Binkley Company LLC.

One of the three accused of violating the board election process and attempting to remove Evans is Edna Baker, who is a former Division of Elections supervisor.  Until last year, Baker oversaw elections in Western Alaska. She retired from her position prior to the voting fraud scandal that rocked District 40 and swung the election from Rep. Ben Nageak to challenger Dean Westlake.

The other two that Sitnasuak is requesting being removed for colluding on the election mailer are Barbara Amarok and Charles Fagerstrom Jr.  Chuck Fagerstrom Sr., the former president of the corporation, had been released by the corporation earlier.

“Our number one priority is to protect the rights of all shareholders and we cannot do that if our elections are compromised,” said Sitnasuak Chairman Bobby Evans, who is the brother of Jason Evans.  “Today, we must look to the future and work together to protect our shared legacy while strengthening our values.”

The lawyer from Holland & Knight said it was about complying with banking and securities laws: “In order to comply with state securities law, Sitnasuak Native Corporation needed to take appropriate legal actions to protect shareholders’ rights and the integrity of future elections,” said Howard Trickey of the law firm representing Sitnasuak.

The new date for the Sitnasuak annual meeting is Sept. 30. On the agenda is the election of four directors to the board.

Sitnasuak shareholders number more than 2,800 and most originated in Nome and villages in the Bering Strait region of Northwest Alaska.  The are Iñupiaq, Yup’ik and St. Lawrence Island Yupiks. The corporation paid more than $2 million in  economic benefits to shareholders in 2016, including special elder dividends, bereavement benefits, heating fuel and rent discounts, and regular dividends.

Voices of Alaskans are heard in health care reform

GUEST OPINION

By SENATOR DAN SULLIVAN and
CONGRESSMAN DON YOUNG

After the enactment of the Affordable Care Act (ACA), we began to hear stories from Alaska families and small businesses that were experiencing fewer healthcare choices and paying skyrocketing costs for health insurance.

In the past few years, those stories have continued with greater frequency and urgency, including those we have heard from Alaskans this summer.

These are tragic stories of real Alaskans, desperately hurting as a result of the ACA. Somehow, these people’s voices have been lost in the ads recently run in Alaska and in the larger political discussion across the country centered on the ACA. Helping these Alaskans and so many others throughout the state is the reason we have been fighting to repeal and repair the Affordable Care Act, as we promised to do.

To be clear: The specter of tens of thousands of Alaskans getting kicked off Medicaid, as depicted in these ads and related political commentary, was incorrect. We would have not have voted for a final health care reform bill that had this result.

We have been against the ACA from the beginning because we believed that, in the end, it would not deliver affordable, quality care for Alaskans. While it’s true that more Alaskans are now insured, it’s also true that many Alaskans now can’t afford the very limited insurance options that are available to them.

Here are just a few of their stories:

One of our constituents lives in Eagle River. He’s worked hard, makes a good living and is solidly middle class. He’s paying more than $30,000 a year in premiums and his deductible before he receives coverage. We’ve heard versions of his story over and over again.

Another Alaska small business owner is being forced to pay $32,000 a year for coverage. She makes close to $100,000 a year — too much for much of a subsidy. But she’s supporting her disabled husband, and two sons. We’ve heard versions of her story over and over again.

A chiropractor in Soldotna is losing customers because of the high cost of insurance. His predicament is compounded by the $3,000 a month he must pay for insurance for his wife and three children, plus a $6,500 deductible per-person. “We are HURTING!” he wrote.

We’ve heard versions of his story over and over.

Another Alaskan constituent said that she and her husband used to pay $200 a month in premiums for insurance. Now they pay $2,000 a month. “We’re just working class people,” she said. “Obamacare has taken everything from us. It’s the first time in our lives we’re without health insurance because we can’t afford it.”

The promises made by those promoting the ACA — Alaskans would have more choices, keep their doctors and their plans, see their premiums and deductibles decrease — haven’t materialized.

To the contrary, since 2013, premiums in the individual market in Alaska have increased 203 percent. The average premium in Alaska is close to $1,100 a month for a plan to cover just one person. These are the most expensive premiums in the nation by far. These premium spikes have coincided with the number of insurers in Alaska’s individual market falling from five to just one.

Many Alaskans are being subsidized by taxpayers to pay these crushing costs. But many aren’t and are having to pay exorbitant premiums and deductibles or pay a penalty to the federal government for refusing to do so. Indeed, as of 2014, when the numbers were last available, about 23,000 Alaskans either could not afford health insurance under the ACA, or bristled at the individual mandate requiring them to purchase coverage, choosing instead to opt out of coverage altogether and pay a penalty to their own federal government.

Just as people who before couldn’t get insurance because they couldn’t afford the high cost of what was available in the high risk pools, the many Alaskans who receive little to no subsidy and have to pay the full cost, cannot be ignored.

They are our middle class. Our job creators. Our entrepreneurs. They are the backbone of Alaska’s economy which is already struggling through a recession. We cannot afford to lose more middle class Alaskans and we have not, and will not, stop fighting for them.

Although we are the first to admit that we could have done a better job explaining our health care form efforts, Republicans in Congress did have a plan to repeal and repair the ACA — one that we and our staffs had been working on nonstop for months — and one that we were confident would help Alaskan families who are being financially devastated by the ACA while at the same time protecting those Alaskans who became covered under the ACA.

We want to emphasize that the plan would not have pulled the rug out from under anyone in our state, particularly vulnerable Alaskans in our Medicaid population.

Congress’ most recent effort on healthcare, the Better Care Reconciliation Act (BRCA), included the following provisions, many of which we played a key role in ensuring were in the bill, and ones that we will continue to fight for:

— Retaining key ACA protections, including continuous coverage for those with preexisting conditions, allowing dependents to stay on their parents’ insurance plan until they are 26 years old, and continuing to disallow lifetime or yearly caps on coverage.

— Repealing the ACA’s onerous mandates, like the individual and employer mandates, and burdensome taxes, like the so-called “Cadillac tax,” which will further drive up costs and will have an enormous negative impact on the vast majority of health care plans in Alaska.

— Providing more flexibility to Alaska to design its own health care system and bring down premium costs, while supporting such state-based innovations with billions of dollars of federal support, including specific federal funding set-asides for states like Alaska with the highest premiums in the country.

— Establishing a $45 billion fund to help states, like Alaska, that are struggling with mental health and drug addiction epidemics, like opioids and heroin. Alaska would have received tens of millions of dollars from this BRCA provision to help those in recovery.

— Dramatically increasing funding for Community Health Centers throughout the country, 160 of which are in Alaska, constituting 10 percent of America’s community health centers and serving more than 100,000 Alaskans per year.

— Protecting the significant advances made by the Alaska Native health care delivery system, which has been a bright spot for health care in our state.

Finally, the BRCA would have begun the important process of putting our nation’s Medicaid system on a sustainable and equitable path for America and Alaska, protecting our most vulnerable citizens and future generations who need this vital program. We worked for months on this important and complex topic. We were confident that any final health care reform bill would have protected Alaska’s disabled, blind, low income, and expansion populations under Medicaid and would have brought more, not less, Medicaid funding to Alaska.

Unfortunately, the BRCA did not receive majority support in the U.S. Senate and the ability to continue to move forward with these important reforms means that, for the short term at least, the status quo will remain.

But we haven’t given up. Going forward, we will continue to advocate for many of these provisions included in the BCRA. We will also be examining other ways to address the ever-increasing costs of health care in America, including lowering pharmaceutical prices, dis-incentivizing the practice of excessive defensive medicine, instituting medical malpractice reforms, and continuing to focus on our mental health and drug addiction challenges.

We will also continue working with the heads of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services and the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services to encourage them to focus on the specific challenges we have in Alaska, and to bring much needed relief to spiking premium and deductible costs as best we can through the current law and regulations.

We are confident that the granting of Alaska’s 1332 waiver by the Trump administration, the first of its kind and a model for other states, will bring some relief to our citizens with a decrease in premiums in the individual market for the first time in years.

The healthcare debate over the last nine years has been beset by many promises. When advertising the original ACA legislation, Democrats made extensive promises that didn’t come true. Republicans also made a promise to repeal and repair the ACA. As of now, none of these promises have been kept.

Breaking these promises can breed cynicism in the political process, especially in such politically challenging times. Our promise to Alaskans is to continue to work relentlessly for you, educating others about Alaska, listening, and taking input from all sides and then developing legislative proposals to help address Alaska’s unique challenges.

We still believe that the best course for Alaska and our nation is to repeal and repair the ACA. We fear that without serious reforms to our health care system, chaos and uncertainty will continue. Without reforms, our middle class will continue to suffer. Our state will continue to lose workers and our businesses will be forced to pay increasingly higher health care costs and lower wages to their employees.

“There is nothing affordable about my health insurance options.” – long-time Alaskan

“There is nothing affordable about my health insurance options,” one long-time Alaskan wrote. Her monthly premiums in 2016 would have been $1,441, with a $5,250 deductible. She decided to risk being uninsured.

“Those fees, on top of the $300 a month for the necessary thyroid and statin medications I require, have brought me to the point where I will not be able to afford health care.”

She’s 62 years old. Her husband is 70. They own a small business, hire people and pay taxes. He should have retired by now, but he can’t because they need to save up in case something happens to her health. She’s a tough Alaskan, but for her, it’s infuriating, and it’s frightening. “We’re gambling,” she said. “But there are no other options.”

Doing nothing for this Alaskan, and thousands of others in similar dire circumstances, is not an option that should be acceptable to any Alaskan.

Don Young represents Alaska in the U.S. House of Representatives. Dan Sullivan represents Alaska in the U.S. Senate.

Heads and Tails: Millett running for something

WE HAVE A RACE: Rep. Charisse Millett spent several days fishing on the Kenai Peninsula and then finished it off by filing a letter of intent with the Alaska Public Offices Commission. She’s running for something — either her House seat in District 25 or the Senate seat she expects Sen. Kevin Meyer to vacate as he (possibly) runs for lieutenant governor.

Millett is House minority leader and represents somewhat of a swing district. Rep. Chris Birch, District 26, has already filed his letter of intent, and he indicated he’s running for Senate. Pat Higgins, who ran against Millett in 2016 has filed a letter of intent, without indicating what he’s running for — House or Senate.

The awkward part is that Sen. Meyer has not indicated he is actually running for lieutenant governor. He is still considering it.

Millett has been preparing for her run by looking for a replacement for District 25, and word has it that Josh Revak and Millett have been discussing the District 25 race. Revak is an Army veteran, and if you see him, have him call Must Read Alaska.

DISTRICT 23 PRIMARY CONTEST: Republican Connie Dougherty, a hair stylist who lives in District 23, has filed for the House seat currently occupied by Rep. Chris Tuck. She’s a small-business Republican who understands making payroll. Forrest McDonald, also Republican, had filed for the seat earlier, setting up a primary contest.

Also filing today was Indie-Democrat Dan Ortiz, for his Ketchikan seat. He caucuses with the Democrats running the House of Representatives. Gabrielle LeDoux, who is House Rules Chair, filed her candidate registration report for reelection in her District 15 seat. She caucuses with the Democrats running the House.

LeDoux was officially denounced by the Alaska Republican Party earlier this year, although she showed up at the quarterly meeting to fight the divorce proceedings. She can receive no campaign funds or support from the Alaska Republican Party or its subdivisions at this time. However, she’s still officially registered as a Republican. Awkward.

Maybe she doesn’t need the party. She has her own Gabby’s Tuesday PAC, where she scrapes money out of lobbyists’ wallets. It’s legal, because the legislation that would have stopped her behavior got stranded in … wait for it … her Rules committee.

NAME CHANGE POLL: Must Read Alaska ran a poll on Facebook about whether Alaskans want the “Dispatch” name dispatched under the new owners, and the results — not scientific — were overwhelming: 150 said they want the name changed, and 7 indicated it’s fine the way it is.

SPOTTED: At the Tongass Democrats’ picnic this weekend, copies on the tables of the book, “Why Mommy is a Democrat.” It’s for children. Or it might be a satire for adults. And it’s illustrated by a Russian emigre, because Democrats love irony, too. Available from third-party sellers on Amazon.

Academic freedom: License to shill a politically correct doctrine

It was all the rage earlier this year when a UAA art professor painted an image of Donald Trump’s bloodied, severed head and displayed it on campus.

Now, another UAA professor has put pen to paper to call his own university racist, for simply encouraging students to be tolerant.

Professor Eric “EJR” David has something to get off his chest: “White Supremacy is winning in my university.”

His university is the University of Alaska Anchorage.

In the online Huffington Post, psychology professor David takes UAA to the woodshed for a memo sent out campus-wide after the Charlottesville clash last week that left one protestor dead.

The memo from Interim Chancellor Samuel Gingerich encouraged people to be tolerant, to reject hate, and to welcome all. That was the problem: You cannot welcome all in David’s world.

The wording on the memo, Professor David says, is proof that that “white supremacy is winning” at UAA:

“Dear UAA Community,

In light of events in Charlottesville, Virginia, and in the aftermath that is playing out across our nation, we must affirm UAA’s commitment to diversity, tolerance and inclusion, the values that underpin the University’s Diversity Inclusion and Action Plan.

The UAA community must reject hatred and violence, and be a place that is welcoming to all, including those of different races and ethnicities, national origins, sexual orientations, gender identities, religions and cultural backgrounds. While opposing hatred and violence, and the groups that espouse hatred and violence, we must and will honor and encourage tolerance.

We value and celebrate our diverse community. As a campus, as a Cabinet and I, as Chancellor, honor this commitment. This is inherent in our mission: to maintain a campus where all can teach, learn and serve.

I invite you to join me on Sept. 12, from 1-3 p.m. in the Lew Haines Conference Room, Library 307, to learn more about the Diversity Inclusion and Action Plan and how you can help with its implementation.”

The UAA prof is making a living on the grievance industry, paid for via oil dollars that flow into the State treasury. Race-baiting and gender-baiting has become his stock-in-trade.

One of his works-in-progress is titled,  “The Sexist Microaggressions, Experiences and Stress Scale (Sexist MESS): Initial Scale Development and Mental Health Implications.” 

And because this is Must Read Alaska, here are his publications:  “Brown Skin, White Minds: Filipino -/ American Postcolonial Psychology” and the editor of “Internalized Oppression: The Psychology of Marginalized Groups.” He has two upcoming books, “The Psychology of Oppression” (Springer Publishing) and “We Have Not Stopped Trembling Yet” (SUNY Press).

No doubt some of these are required reading for his classes and textbook sales provide him royalties.

The University system received $317 million in state funding for 2017-18, which was $8 million lower than the $325 million it had in 2016-2017. But it’s still a public dollar contribution of more than $15,850 per student enrolled in the system. That’s one third higher than the national average for public universities.

Heads and Tails: Begich wonders what to do with his life; Mallott forgets his manners

WHAT TO DO WITH MARK: While Mark Begich, one-term Democrat senator for Alaska, mulls a run for governor, he has asked his supports what they think. Should he run?

Some of them think he’d be handing the win to the Republican nominee, whomever that is.

Meanwhile, Begich was the “Sold Out!” keynote speaker at the Democrats’ Lee Hamilton Dinner in French Lick, Indiana tonight. It’s a cooperative fundraiser held with the Indiana Democratic Editorial Association. You read that right: There is such a thing.

ALASKANS FOR INTEGRITY, BROUGHT TO YOU BY JIM LOTTSFELDT? A new independent expenditure group has filed its first report with the Alaska Public Offices Commission.

Alaskans for Integrity, spearheaded by Democrat and campaign strategist Jim Lottsfeldt, shows tens of thousands of dollars in contributions from a liberal Massachusetts firm called “Represent.Us.”

The group wants to end closed primaries (like the Alaska Republican Primary), wants progressive voting (ranking of your preferred winners on the ballot), wants to restructure how redistricting is accomplished (their way is best, surely), and a host of other suggestions.

It’s likely some type of voter initiative will be on the 2018 General Election ballot that will swing the state more to the blue side, as that is the ultimate goal.

Lottsfeldt lobbies for unions, for Anchorage Mayor Ethan Berkowitz, and he ran former Sen. Mark Begich’s super-PAC Put Alaska First, which spent tens of thousands of dollars opposing Dan Sullivan, who eventually beat Begich.

BYRON MALLOTT TO CHARGE COMMISSION FOR VOTING DATA: The Presidential Advisory Commission on Election Integrity can have whatever anyone else can have in the voter database.

Any citizen can get the information from the Division of Elections for $21, so the lieutenant governor going to charge the commission the same. And force the commission to file a public records request for it.

LG Mallott seems unaware that Alaska gets more money from the federal taxpayers than any other state on a per capita basis. Total federal spending per capita in Alaska is $17,762.

But political activist David Nees of Anchorage says, “No problem.” He’s already sent the commission the information it asked for — and didn’t charge a penny.

 

CECIL ANDRUS, RIP: Former Interior Secretary Cecil V. Andrus, who managed the lock-up of millions of acres of Alaska land during the Jimmy Carter administration, has died at 85.

He served four terms as Idaho governor. Halfway through his second term, he resigned to become Carter’s secretary of the Interior and he stayed in that role through Carter’s term, which ended in 1981. Andrus ran for governor of Idaho again, and became the first four-term governor of the state, but was also the last Democrat to serve in that position.

Carter signed the Alaska National Interest Lands Conservation Act (ANILCA), making 104 million acres of land unavailable for resource development. Much of the land was set aside as wilderness over the objections of Alaskans, including the late Sen. Ted Stevens and Congressman Don Young.

DISTRICT 10 HAS A ‘D’ CHALLENGER ALREADY, BUT IS SHE? Patricia Faye-Brazel is a lifelong Democrat living in Houston, Alaska. Last year, she filed to run against Rep. David Eastman, who is her opposite politically. Eastman won.

Faye-Brazel is a Bernie Democrat, and in May, 2017 she filed once again for the Wasilla House District 10 seat, for the 2018 race.

Except now on Facebook she says she’s quit the Democrat party because of what happened during the 2016 primary cycle when the party machine engineered a win for Hillary Clinton over Bernie Sanders. Has she become one of Bill Walker’s new nonpartisans?