Uber, Lyft fees to soar at Anchorage airport
(2-minute read) COMMENT PERIOD ENDS JAN 31
Independent ride-sharing drivers may have to charge their riders $2.50 more to be picked up and dropped off at the Anchorage and Fairbanks international airports.
The $5 roundtrip fee the State seeks to charge riders who ride in an Uber or Lyft to the airport, rather than a cab, is the subject of a comment period that ends on Jan. 31 at 4:30 pm.
Transportation Network Companies, or TNCs as they are called, don’t pay a fee to drive people to and from the airports. They were only approved to operate in Alaska in 2017 after passage of a bill sponsored by Sen. Mia Costello and Rep. Adam Wool.
But cab companies pay $75 per year in Anchorage and $150 a year in Fairbanks, per cab. Limos in Anchorage pay $150 a year to access the airport.
IS IT FAIR?
Uber and Lyft are two TNCs that operate in Anchorage.
In 2018, about half of the active drivers made 95 percent of the trips to the airport. Those trips averaged out to 187 trips per driver. A $2.50 fee for those drivers would mean $467 a year in fees, meaning that Uber and Lyft users would pay more than four times the fees that cabs are paying — and passing along to their customers.
Last year’s TNC driver with the most number of trips to the airport would have paid $4,993 to the Ted Stevens International Airport, if the fee structure applied in 2018.
The public hasn’t heard much about the proposed fees, and information on it is buried in the State of Alaska website.
Sending in a public comment on it will require some effort, as there is no email address provided by the State to submit messages electronically. You’ll need to do it the old-fashioned way by writing to:
Keith Day, Controller
Alaska International Airports System
P.O. Box 196960
Anchorage, AK 99519-6960
Comments may also be hand-delivered to Room C-3588, South Terminal, Ted Stevens Anchorage International Airport during business hours.
Should this murderer go free? Help Parole Board decide
(1-minute read) DEADLINE APPROACHES FOR COMMENT
The Alaska Parole Board has heard from more than 220 Alaskans about the pending parole hearing for killer Jonathan Norton, since news of his upcoming parole hearing was covered earlier this month in MustReadAlaska.
The parole board will meet on Feb. 4 to hear Norton’s request to be set free after serving just one third of his sentence for the horrific murder of Duane Samuels in 1989.
Jonathan Norton rang the doorbell of Duane Samuel’s house one October morning, demanding his car keys and then shooting him three times. It was one of the most notorious murders of the era because it was both premeditated and a stranger murder.
Friends of the Samuels family have since created a website about Duane to give people more information, should they want to help the family keep Norton off the streets.
The parole board must receive letters of support for his release or continued incarceration by noon, Feb. 1. So far, most letters are opposing his release, MustReadAlaska has learned.
Write to the Parole Board here:
Parole Board: [email protected]
The Office for Victims Rights: [email protected]
The MustReadAlaska story about Duane Samuels’ murder is linked below. Caution: details are gruesome:
Don Young is ‘in’ for 2020
(2-minute read) LONGTIME CAMPAIGN MANAGER RETIRES, NEW TEAM FORMING
Congressman Don Young will be a candidate for U.S. House again in 2020.
His State Director Chad Padgett said this morning that Young’s long-time campaign manager has retired and a new campaign team is in the early stages of organizing. Jerry Hood had run Young’s campaign since 2012.
On March 8, 2019, Young will become the longest serving Republican in the history of the House and Senate. He is serving his 24th term in the House as Alaska’s congressman since 1973. He is the last remaining member of Congress who has been in office since the Nixon Administration. He became the Dean of the House of Representatives on Dec. 5, 2017, after the resignation of John Conyers from Michigan.
Rep. Joseph Gurney Cannon of Illinois served in the House for 46 years to the day, but his service was not continuous. Don Young has served for 45 years, 325 days, as of Jan. 26, 2019.
In the Senate, Sen. Strom Thurmond of South Carolina served 47 years, 5 months and 8 days, but he started his Senate tenure as a Democrat, for his first 10 years in office.
Young moved to Alaska in 1959 and settled in Fort Yukon, above the Arctic Circle. He worked in gold mining, trapping, and construction. He also captained a tugboat, running a barge operation on the Yukon River. In the winters, he taught at the local Bureau of Indian Affairs elementary school.

Hood came to Alaska in 1970 and worked in the broadcast industry before joining the Teamsters Union in 1973, where he was a shop steward, editor of the union’s newsletter, business representative, and executive director of the Teamster’s political action committee, among other roles.
No replacement for Hood has been named, Padgett said.
Dunleavy announces dozens of board, commission appointments
(2-minute read) CHANGES 5 OF 7 ON BOARD OF NURSING
Gov. Michael Dunleavy announced 44 appointments to State boards and commissions. He replaced five of seven members of the Board of Nursing, and replaced all three members of the Clemency Board.
The Nursing Board regulates and approves applications for licenses and permits, and discipline of nurses.
The Clemency Board makes recommendations to the Governor to grant a pardon, commutation, reprieve or remission of fines and forfeitures concerning state crimes. Dunleavy removed Bruce Botelho, Jim Cantor and Nancy Shaw. He named Ralph Samuels, Carol Fraser and Scotty Barr to the board.
The state has over 140 boards and commissions. Many citizens get their start in politics by serving on one.
Alaska Commission on Aging
- Nona Safra of Anchor Point
- Mike Coons of Palmer
Alaska Commission on Judicial Conduct
- Trevor Shaw of Ketchikan
Alaska Judicial Council
- David Parker of Wasilla (reappointment)
Alaska Police Standards Council
- Jennifer Winkelman of Juneau (Correctional Administrative Officer)
- Rebecca Hamon of King Salmon (reappointment)
- Chief Stephen Dutra of North Pole (reappointment)
- Chief Burke Waldron of Bethel (reappointment)
Alaska Workers’ Compensation Board
- Bob Doyle of Wasilla
- Bradley Austin of Juneau (reappointment)
- Sarah LeFebvre of Fairbanks (reappointment)
- Dr. Christopher Twiford of Kodiak
- Albert Haynes of Wasilla
- Sara Faulkner of Homer
- Randy Beltz of Anchorage
- Julie Duquette of Fairbanks
Big Game Commercial Services Board
- Tom Harris of Anchorage
- Jason Bunch of Kodiak (reappointment)
- Cash Joyce of Wasilla (reappointment)
Board of Direct-Entry Midwives
- Cathy Mosher of Willow
Board of Governors of Alaska Bar Association
- Jedediah Cox of Anchorage
Board of Marine Pilots
- Edward Sinclair of Juneau
Board of Massage Therapy
- Julie Endle of Palmer
Board of Nursing
- Julie Tisdale of Anchorage
- Danette Schloeder of Anchorage
- Marisha Dieters of Eagle River
- Wendy Monrad of Anchorage
- Shannon Connelly of Palmer
Board of Social Work Examiners
- Geoffry McCormick of North Pole (reappointment)
- Colleen Vague of Wasilla
Board of Psychologists and Psychological Associate Examiners
- Dr. Erin Johnson of Anchorage
- Dr. Matthew Dammeyer of Soldotna
Board of Veterinary Examiners
- Scott Flamme of Fairbanks
Executive Clemency Advisory Committee
- Ralph Samuels of Anchorage (Chair)
- Carol Fraser of Anchorage
- Scotty Barr of Kotzebue
Fishermen’s Fund Advisory and Appeals Council
- Moses Toyukak Sr of Manokotak
Marijuana Control Board
- Vivian Stiver of Fairbanks
- Lt. Christopher Jaime of Soldotna
Personnel Board
- Craig Johnson of Anchorage
Professional Teaching Practices Commission
- Todd Smoldon of Wasilla
State Commission for Human Rights
- Marcus Sanders (Anchorage)
Violent Crimes Compensation Board
- John Francis of Wasilla
Workers Compensation Appeals Commission
- Charles Collins, Jr of Juneau
Are Juneau officials misleading public about cruise industry lawsuit?
By WIN GRUENING
SENIOR CONTRIBUTOR
There was a great deal of speculation about how City and Borough of Juneau officials would react to Federal Judge H. Russell Holland’s recent ruling on the cruise industry (CLIA) lawsuit. CLIA lodged the lawsuit in 2016 in an attempt to clarify the legal and permissible uses of Juneau’s marine passenger fees and port development fees.
The suspense is over.

In two public presentations last week, Juneau City Manager Rorie Watt laid out the city’s case.
Watt described issues surrounding the lawsuit as “a ball of spaghetti”. While the city has chosen “not to litigate these issues publicly in the past,” Watt explained that now it’s time to take their case to the public.
The timing seems odd since Judge Holland ruled that many of the proposed projects and services to be funded by passenger fees would be considered unconstitutional under the U. S. Constitution’s Tonnage Clause because they do not provide a service to cruise ship vessels.
Has the city chosen to abandon legal arguments in favor of a public relations campaign thereby hoping to gain negotiating advantage?
Perhaps. But is that the best way to encourage a mutually agreeable settlement or does it foment further acrimony between the community and the industry?
Watt claims that not much will change as a result of the ruling because the city “won” the lawsuit on two major points:
- The ruling reaffirmed the collection of marine passenger fees and port development fees is constitutional.
- The ruling didn’t say the use of past fees was illegal.
Both points, while technically true, ignore that they were not issues CLIA contested.
CLIA has acknowledged the collection of these fees is not necessarily unconstitutional but contend many of Juneau’s uses of revenue generated by the fees are unconstitutional.
Moreover, Judge Holland’s decision concerned prospective uses of the fees and therefore did not address the issue of past fees.
Here’s what relevant portions of Judge Holland’s 35-page order did say:
- “Expenditure of marine passenger fees and port development fees for services to passengers only, such as crossing guards, repair and maintenance of sidewalks” are unconstitutional “because they do not constitute a service to a vessel.”
- Furthermore, the order states, “…the question… is not whether Juneau’s use of marine passenger fees and port development funds benefits passengers. Passenger benefits are not relevant. The proper question as to each category of expenditure by defendants is: Does the expenditure provide a service to a vessel? If the answer is yes, the expenditure is constitutional. If the answer is no, the expenditure is unconstitutional….”
- And finally, “Expenditures or fees imposed upon vessels which enhance the tourist experience of passengers brought to Juneau by plaintiffs’ members’ vessels do not qualify as a service to a vessel, even though the enhancement of passengers’ experience at Juneau may benefit plaintiffs’ members financially.”
Despite the decision’s clear wording, City Manager Watt maintains that expenditures solely serving cruise passengers also benefit the vessel.
Questioned on this point, Watt posits the proposed Archipelago project on the Juneau wharf and debt service funding for the new Juneau cruise ship docks as expenditures that could be jeopardized under CLIA’s interpretation. Yet, the docks clearly benefit the vessel and would be certainly constitutional. The Archipelago project is one that could be a subject of negotiation due to its proximity and connection to the cruise dock.
I have no personal knowledge of the legal strategy of Juneau or the cruise industry. Nor is it my intention to defend the cruise industry. They have plenty of people capable of doing that. My concern is getting the fairest deal for all concerned.
Everyone needs to consider, what are the risks of prolonging this litigation?
With city legal costs approaching $1 million, the longer this lawsuit drags on, the costlier it will be.
Further judicial pronouncements could be more specific and may enforce compliance. How would this affect potential negotiations with CLIA?
With this latest ruling already setting a precedent, further rulings may further cement precedent limiting the uses of similar fees imposed by other ports in Alaska.
How can legitimate concerns about the funding of infrastructure to support the growing numbers of cruise ship visitors be addressed while embroiled in a legal battle with the industry?
Public assertions by city officials that don’t square with the facts of the case or Judge Holland’s order complicate opportunities for negotiation.
Mischaracterizing the possible consequences of the judge’s decision do not help encourage elected assembly members to work cooperatively with the cruise industry or to resolve any ambiguities.
It can be a fine line between “spin” and misleading the public.
No one is well served by the latter.
Win Gruening retired as the senior vice president in charge of business banking for Key Bank in 2012. He was born and raised in Juneau and graduated from the U.S. Air Force Academy in 1970. He is active in community affairs as a 30-plus year member of Juneau Downtown Rotary Club and has been involved in various local and statewide organizations.
Marilyn Stewart accepts position with Dunleavy
(1-minute read) KNOWN AS LISTENER, COMMUNICATOR
A former candidate for House District 21 is now the deputy director for community relations for Gov. Michael Dunleavy. She will be based in the Anchorage office and be engaged in outreach work to various communities across Alaska.
Stewart is originally from Alabama. She came to Alaska with the U.S. Army and was stationed at Fort Richardson.
In 2012, she was awarded the Freedom’s Sister Award by Ford Motor Company for her community outreach. Previous recipients included Myrlie Evers-Williams, Barbara Jordan, and Rosa Parks.
She is the former director of the Office of Equal Opportunity under Anchorage Mayor Dan Sullivan, small business development program manager at the Alaska Department of Commerce, deputy director of community relations for Gov. Frank Murkowski, and constituent relations aide to Gov. Tony Knowles.
Stewart was the first executive director of Bridge Builders of Anchorage, and president/CEO of the Alaska Black Chamber of Commerce.
She was a volunteer on the re-election campaign of Gov. Sean Parnell, and ran for State House in 2016 and 2018 against Rep. Matt Claman, losing both times to the incumbent Democrat.
Breaking: Two appointees out: Quick and Chance
QUICK QUIT, AND CHANCE TURNED DOWN APPOINTMENT
Two appointees of the new Dunleavy Administration have withdrawn from their appointments.
John Quick, the Department of Administration commissioner, offered his resignation today. It was accepted after too many irregularities in his resume were revealed in the media.
Art Chance, who was offered a position in the Department of Administration, decided to not accept an offer of employment. Chance, a rough-hewn labor negotiator, had a social media presence that would have been a distraction to the Administration. He has been a columnist at Must Read Alaska, but it’s his sometimes raw language on Facebook that was becoming an issue, in light of the dismissal of former Assistant Attorney General Libby Bakalar, who kept a savage and coarse blog going during the Walker Administration.
Chance had shut down his Facebook page upon deciding to work for the Dunleavy Administration, but the trail of social media is long and unforgiving.
When asked for comment, Gov. Michael J. Dunleavy stated the following: “This decision is for the best.”
Gov. Michael Dunleavy named Paula Vrana as Acting Commissioner of Administration.
“Earlier this evening, Commissioner Designee Jonathan Quick resigned. I appreciate his willingness to serve the people of Alaska and wish him the best in his future endeavors,” Governor Dunleavy said in a press release.
“I appointed Paula Vrana as Acting Commissioner of Administration.
“Acting Commissioner Vrana is an attorney who joined the Department of Administration on Jan. 2, 2019. She immediately immersed herself in your department’s important role to the State of Alaska, and I am confident you are in good hands,” Dunleavy wrote in a letter to Department of Administration employees.
Quick, in his letter of resignation, strongly refuted some of the claims made against him, but said he didn’t want to become a distraction.
For Commissioner Designee Quick’s letter of resignation, click here.
This story will be updated. Check back.