Saturday, July 11, 2026
Home Blog Page 1407

Video: Sen. Sullivan blasts Democrats over defense filibuster, Green New Deal

3

Sen. Dan Sullivan blasted Democrats on the floor of the Senate for filibustering defense spending and putting national security in peril

“Since I’ve been in the Senate, there’s been no bill filibustered more by Senate Democrats than the bill that would fund our military,” Sullivan said. 

“My colleagues on the other side of the aisle have, time and again, leveraged funding of our troops to gain political concessions on other issues. The men and women who serve in the military don’t deserve this.

“It’s clear to me that supporting our troops and military readiness is not a priority for Senate Democrats, and I think that’s shameful.” – Sen. Dan Sullivan

“I hope Americans across the country get word of exactly what is happening, contact their Senators, and let them know that filibustering this critical troop funding is unacceptable.”

The Fiscal Year 2020 defense appropriations bill provides:

  • $694.9 billion in funding for the Department of Defense, including $1.7 billion in disaster recovery funds
  • A 3.1 percent pay raise for America’s troops
  • Funding for 96 F-35 fifth-generation fighter aircraft
  • Funding for a hypersonic and ballistic tracking space sensor, vital to the future of America’s missile defense
  • Funding for the U.S. Army’s 58 Brigade Combat Teams, 6 Security Force Assistance Brigades and 11 Combat Aviation Brigades

Senate Democrats are withholding support because the bill has funding for the southern border wall sought by President Donald Trump, and they don’t want to give Trump any kind of victory going into an election year. The bill failed on a procedural vote of 51-41, short of the 60 votes needed.

“I’ve been here for almost five years. One of the big reasons I ran for the Senate was to stop the gutting of our military and take care of our troops.” Form 2010 to 2015, readiness plummeted, defense spending plummeted. We’ve turned that around…this congress, Republicans in control, with a Republican in the White House, we’ve turned that around,” Sullivan said.

Sullivan gave credit to those Democrats who realize that the Obama era cuts were harmful to national security.

The package of spending also included money for the Departments of Labor and Health and Human Services.

Grace Jang heads to DC to work for Murkowski

14

The former communication director for Gov. Bill Walker has a new gig and a new scene: Grace Jang starts next week as the communications director for the Senate Energy and Natural Resources Committee, chaired by Sen. Lisa Murkowski.

Jang was a television news anchor up until the 2014 General Election, when she jumped over to become the communication director for Walker. Later, she also took on the title of deputy chief of staff. She is a close associate of Scott Kendall, Walker’s former chief of staff who is leading the recall campaign against Gov. Michael Dunleavy.

Murkowski’s chairmanship of the Senate Natural Resources Committee ends in one year. Thus, the communication job has a shelf life of up to 12 months, as a new chairman will bring in his or her own staff.

As a Bill Walker alumnus, Jang opened up a communications consultancy focused on crisis communications.

The job she takes in Washington pays unusually well, over $171,000 per year. The most recent communication director for the committee was Nicole Daigle, who left in May of 2019. Robert Dillon, longtime Alaska journalist, held the position prior to Daigle.

Jang handled the meltdown of the Walker Administration. As journalists started asking too many questions, she asked them to back off and give the administration time to grieve after the resignation of Lt. Gov. Byron Mallott.

[Read: Governor’s Office asks journalists to take one for the team]

Her crisis communication skills may come in handy in Washington during the coming election year, when a lot of turmoil is brewing, although Murkowski herself is not up for reelection until 2022.

LISA MURKOWSKI, DONALD TRUMP IN THE HEADLINES

A Washington Post White House reporter quoted President Donald Trump at a GOP event in Washington at the Trump International Hotel on Thursday.

Trump asked if Sen. Lisa Murkowski was there, but she was not. 

“She hates me. I kind of like her but she really doesn’t like me. We do so much for Alaska you’d think we’d get her vote for something one of these days,” the president told the crowded ballroom.

Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell has given the President some advice about surviving a Senate trial, according to Fox News’ Ed Henry:

“Forget about Ukraine. Talk to Senator Lisa Murkowski from Alaska, McConnell said, about her energy plan, instead of talking about Ukraine. Make her important on these issues. And stop talking about Ukraine. Focus on policy. She’s a swing vote. Somebody who could turn against the president. She was a swing vote on Kavanaugh.”

Saturday: Congressman Young meets AMAC seniors

3

Congressman Don Young will be the featured guest at the Saturday meeting of the Association of Mature American Citizens, Saturday, Nov. 9, at 11 am. at the Palmer Senior Center, 1132 S Chugach Street, Palmer, AK 99645.

AMAC is a conservative’s alternative for AARP, focused on protecting the interests of America’s seniors, fighting taxes, excessive government overreach and calling for accountability at all levels of government. AMAC advocates for the values of faith, family, and freedom.

Veterans Day events around Alaska this weekend

0

Friday, Saturday, Nov. 8-9: Military Care Package event at local Harley dealers. Last days to drop off donations.

Saturday, Nov. 9, 9:30 am: Veterans Day run at the Brotherhood Bridge in Juneau, 8K and 1 mile fun run and walk.

Saturday, Nov. 9, 9:30 am: Veterans Day Memorial Shoot at the Juneau Gun Club. Standard PITA 300 Target Shoot 100 Singles 100 Handicap 50 Pair Doubles.

Sunday Nov. 10, 6 pm: Elks Lodge, 1003 Pioneer Road, Fairbanks, has a spaghetti and meatball dinner upstairs in the antler room, open to all vets, active duty and family. There will be a guest speaker.

Sunday, Nov. 10, 1-3 pm: Veterans Day dinner at Grace Lutheran Church, 47585 Ciechanski Road, Kenai.

Sunday, Nov. 10, 3 pm: Veterans Day concert, at the Glenn Massay Theater in Wasilla, with the Matanuska-Susitna Orchestra. Free concert. Details.

Monday, Nov. 11, 10:30 am: The Department of Military and Veterans Affairs will have a Veterans Day Ceremony at the Alaska National Guard Armory, Joint Base Elmendorf-Richardson.

Monday, Nov. 11, noon: Ceremony at Glenn Massay Theater honroing Mat-Su Valley resident and World War II POW Walt Fergus.

Monday, Nov. 11, 5 pm: Veterans Day Dinner, Elks Lodge No. 420, 9321 Glacier Highway in Juneau.

Monday, Nov. 11, 9:45 am to 11:45 pm: Veterans Appreciation Event at the Alaska Airlines Center, 3550 Providence Drive, Anchorage.

Monday, Nov. 11, 2 – 6 pm. American Legion Post 28, 7001 Brayton Drive, Anchorage. The grill will be fired up and members will be bringing pot luck. It will be a great day to join in fellowship and remembrance. Donations appreciated.

Monday, Nov. 11, 11 am-12:30 pm: Fairbanks Veterans Day at the Westmark Fairbanks Hotel & Conference Center, 813 Noble St., Fairbanks. Live music with the US Army Alaska Arctic Warrior Band. Formal Ceremony. Displays, coffee and cake.

Nov. 20, 6-7:30 pm: Veterans Town Hall at the Anchor Point Senior Center.

Nov. 21, 5-6:30 pm: Veterans Town Hall at the Kenai Visitor and Cultural Center.

Time for elected sheriffs? A long-term solution

19

By LARRY WOOD

Gov. Michael Dunleavy has started his comprehensive public safety plan by putting an end to the insanity that was SB91.  However, the plan has yet to address the 1,200-pound polar bear in the room, which is the lack of any law enforcement in many villages in the Bush.

It is time that the State get serious about amending the Constitution to allow for elected sheriffs as part of a long term solution.

The U.S. Attorney General has announced a total grant of $42M to be applied to the problem. There has been as of yet no announcement as to how the money will be spent. If it goes to the villages directly, kiss it good-bye. 

Without addressing the need to upgrade both the courts and Corrections in the Bush, more police officers will produce more offenders, but there will be no way to process them, or imprison them, given the growing backlog of cases and the closure of Palmer Correctional Center.

It is unlikely that the $42 million would buy enough new police officers to make a difference, given the lack of qualified candidates. 

Neither the Alaska State Troopers, Corrections, or the National Guard are able to meet their recruiting quotas, because of the lack of qualified candidates. The integrity of America’s core demographic is rapidly disintegrating.

 Over 72 percent of those 17-24 across the country are ineligible for military service due to physical, criminal, and/or education disqualifications. 

In Alaska, it is the 17-34-year-old demographic living in the Bush that reflects the systemic failures in our education system, the collapse of the family, and a lack of respect for education and the law.  Greater than 99 percent of those ages 17-34 living in the Bush are ineligible for military service due to education and/or criminal record disqualifications.

If you can’t enlist, you certainly cannot hope to become a police officer or corrections officer.

 So, how can this $42 million produce any benefit or act to relieve the suffering of those abused? The bodies are simply not there to provide the qualified first responders.  And, there is a decided lack of criminal justice infrastructure to support a major increase in law enforcement in the Bush.

The regional Native corporations and the village corporations need to be willing to act to work in concert with the state and federal government to provide the criminal justice and law enforcement facilities, mental health and substance abuse facilities and the training for personnel in the Bush. And, it is time they paid their fair share of the cost of providing those facilities.  The onus would also be upon the organized an unorganized boroughs to bear part of  the cost of their sheriff’s departments.

In the face of the law enforcement crisis in the Bush, the federal government continues to act to restrict Alaska’s ability to produce revenue from royalties from mineral, timber, and fish and to restrict tourism by maintaining the abuse of our Statehood Compact that is the Alaska National Interest Lands Conservation Act — ANILCA. 

Either the federal government cough up sufficient funding, and $42 million is just a drop in this bucket, or the federal government can repeal ANILCA and return the management of federal lands to the state, end any other restrictive land use changes, and let the state have at the process of putting the land to work for the people.  In either case, the federal government has a tremendous liability in this issue.

The reality of the Bush is the lack of law enforcement manpower, the lack of qualified applicants, geography, time and distance. The sheriffs and their deputies would need to be more peace officer than police officer, like the old Territorial Police. 

Alaska Police Standards Council standards would need to be set aside for the sheriffs departments until time, money, and qualified candidates were forthcoming. 

The Department of Corrections might have to ignore APSC standards for Bush positions for the same reason.

The courts would need to get serious about televising court proceedings to allow an offender in any Alaska village, town or city to appear in court.  More jails would need to be built with facilities to televise a court proceeding and to house corrections and sheriff’s deputies on their “rounds” between villages. Every court room in the state should have a televised hearing capability.

The sheriff would be elected for a four-year term by the qualified voters of a borough or unorganized borough. 

The Village Public Safety Officer program would end, and the VPSOs would become deputies providing a core for future expansion.

An amendment authorizing an elected sheriff’s office would give accountability to the people of the organized and unorganized boroughs in how their law enforcement operated.

The villages would see sheriffs and deputies more than they would the Alaska State Troopers. The deputies would be known to the villagers and sufficiently trained as VPSOs to serve as “frontier” deputies to a sheriff.

The burden in the Bush would be reduced for the Alaska State Troopers.

 The fed’s $42 million would either be a good start to a long term solution, or a really good time for a few families in the Bush.

Larry Wood is a 65-year Alaska resident living on Lazy Mountain.

Judge rules legislature can appropriate future funds

42

DOESN’T BUY DUNLEAVY ‘FUNDS NOT IN HAND’ ARGUMENT

An Alaska Superior Court judge has upheld the Legislature’s right to appropriate future unknown funds for programs it deems important.

The decision, if it stands, will have a substantial impact on lawmaking and budgeting going forward. Legislators may decide to do extensive forward funding programs during an election year, when a new governor is likely to take office. That governor would not be able to reach back and veto funding made and approved in previous years, and may lose the ability to veto for multiple years.

The issue went to court because the Dunleavy Administration argued that appropriating funds that were not yet in hand is unconstitutional.

But Juneau Superior Court Judge Daniel Schally disagreed, writing that “While Alaska’s constitutional framers sought to protect state control over state revenue and to ensure legislative flexibility over the disposition of revenue sources, and to limit certain powers and to avoid certain pitfalls, it is also apparent that the framers did not intend to prevent the state from experimenting and adapting to changing circumstances.”

Scally continued, “Simply put, the forward-funding appropriations here do not constrict the legislature’s power over free disposition of state funds to such a degree that they exceed the legislature’s freedom to experiment and adapt to the changing circumstances and hurdles of the day, particularly in the field of public education.”

Read the entire decision here:

The matter will now go to the Alaska Supreme Court on appeal.

“This decision upends the appropriations process as we know it and could lead to one legislature and governor setting the budget five, six or more years in advance,” said Attorney General Kevin Clarkson. “Although the education funding at issue here was only for one year in advance, following the superior court’s logic, there is really no time limit to speak of on the legislature’s decision to future appropriate, aside from political will. By the superior court’s decision, budgeting five years, six years, even 10 years out is fair game.

“We fundamentally do not believe that is what our constitutional framers envisioned when they discussed an annual budgeting process. This issue is too important not to appeal and get final guidance from the Alaska Supreme Court, so we all know going forward what the rules are.”

In 2018, the Legislature passed an appropriation bill that committed future revenues, not revenues on hand in the State treasury in fiscal year 2019, to pay for education in the future fiscal year 2020.

Clarkson issued a formal Attorney General opinion on May 8, 2019, concluding that the appropriation was unconstitutional and a new appropriation was needed.

The Legislature disagreed and decided not to pass a new appropriation, which left education, in the opinion of the Attorney General, without any constitutional source of funding. The Legislature ultimately sued the governor in order to resolve the dispute.

The Dunleavy Administration has been releasing funds to the education community on a monthly basis under a court-approved stipulation agreed to by both parties.

The current stipulation remains in effect until a final judgment is entered.

Lawsuit filed in Homer over residency of council member

QUESTION: DID STORM HANSEN-CAVASOS LIVE INSIDE CITY LIMITS?

Former Homer City Council member Tom Stroozas has filed a formal election contest with Anchorage Superior Court today, challenging the election and seating of Council member Storm Hansen-Cavasos.

The lawsuit claims that Hansen-Cavasos was not an eligible candidate in the Oct. 1, 2019 City Council election because she failed to meet the residency requirement; Homer City Code requires candidates for the City Council to be residents inside city limits for at least one year prior to the date of the election.

Photo of Storm Hansen-Cavasos being sworn in
Council member Storm Hansen-Cavasos gets sworn on Oct. 28, 2019.

Under Homer City Code, a candidate or 10 registered voters are allowed to contest a municipal election. This involves filing a contest with the City of Homer, and seeking judicial review by filing a complaint with the Superior Court.

“Although, I am sure some partisan types will attack me by saying that this lawsuit is just sour grapes, but this is about election integrity and the rule of law,” said Stroozas. “I have already publicly stated that I will not be seeking the seat on the City Council for myself even if the court orders a new election to be held.”

Prior to the certification of the election, Stroozas filed a formal challenge with the city.

[Read: Homer City Council winner faces residency challenge]

Evidence provided with his challenge were numerous documents and sworn statements showing that Hansen-Cavasos was living in a leased house off East End Road, in Fritz Creek up until Aug. 2019.

[Read: Investigation into candidate’s residency done]

Additionally, in April 2019, some six months before the election, Hansen-Cavasos filed a voter registration claiming her address off East End Road as “the residence address where [she] claim[s] residency.” Hansen-Cavasos’ signed the voter registration “under penalty of perjury” affirming the information provided on her registration form was “true and accurate.” Providing false information on a voter registration form is a Class A Misdemeanor under Alaska Statute 15.56.050.

[Read: Homer council seats member whose residency was challenged]

“Alaska statutes create a strong presumption of residency at the address listed in the voter registration that can only be overcome in very limited circumstances that don’t exist in this case,” said Keri-Ann Baker, attorney with the law firm of Reeves Amodio LLC, which is representing Stroozas in the case.

“What is also unique is that this isn’t a case of someone failing to update their voter registration at their new address, but a candidate filing a voter registration and later claiming it contained false information,” Stroozas said.

Hansen-Cavasos didn’t register to vote at an address inside Homer city limits until August 8, 2019, the same day she filed her Declaration of Candidacy. In her candidate declaration, she claimed to having been a resident of the City of Homer since May 2018. Hansen- Cavasos later submitted an affidavit to the election contest claiming to have moved to Homer in June 2018.

In 2019, Hansen-Cavasos also claimed her address off East End Road as her residence on her Permanent Fund dividend application. Stroozas also provided evidence of several text message and social media postings where Hansen-Cavasos refers to her address off East End Road as her “home”, including one text message on July 4, 2019 where Hansen- Cavasos states that she “will be living in town soon.”

“Ms. Cavasos can’t provide a straight answer on why, if she lived in the City like she claims, she has filed multiple documents with the State of Alaska and other government entities listing a false address,” Stroozas said. “And it’s not like this was a one-time offense. Quite simply, she is either filing multiple false documents with the government under risk of criminal penalty or she is lying to the voters – and she needs to answer for that.”

The City of Homer and the Homer City Council are defendents in the case.

With today’s Anchorage Superior Court filing, Stroozas is seeking a declaration from the court that Hansen-Cavasos was not legally qualified to be a candidate in the election and asks that her election invalidated.

The complaint also seeks a restraining order preventing Hansen- Cavasos from remaining seated on the City Council and from performing official acts as a City Council member until the full case can be heard. Stroozas has also requested that the Superior Court hear the case on an expedited schedule.

Stroozas is represented by Keri-Ann Baker and Tom Amodio of the law firm Reeves Amodio LLC.

“These disputes can be politically charged,” said Baker, “but frankly we are simply focused on the law and ultimately, we are confident that once our client has the opportunity to present all the evidence, he will prevail in this case.”

The case has been assigned to Judge Andrew Guidi.

Cassie Lawver, a conservative activist who originally identified the residency problem with Hansen-Cavasos, is taking contributions to pay for the attorneys. She can be reached at caslawver @ gmail.com.

State asks judge for rehearing on campaign donation limit ruling

9

ANCHORAGE JUDGE EXPANDED $500 CONTRIBUTION LIMITS TO PACS

A little-known liberal advocacy group in Washington, D.C. has won an important ruling from an Anchorage judge to limit future contributions to Alaska super PACs and independent expenditure groups.

The limit would be $500 per person, the same limit that state law applies to candidates’ campaigns.

Now, the State of Alaska has challenged the October ruling, asking for a rehearing because some important elements were left out of the case.

Anchorage Superior Court Judge William Morse ruled in favor of “Equal Citizens,” which brought the lawsuit on behalf of three Alaska Democrats against “Interior Voters for John Coghill,” “Working Families of Alaska,” as well as the Alaska Public Offices Commission.

The case stems back to the 2010 “Citizens United” Supreme Court decision, which said that political action groups may accept donations and influence elections through independent groups that do not coordinate with candidates’ campaigns. That ruling held that the free speech clause of the First Amendment prohibits the government from restricting independent money spent for political communications by corporations, nonprofit corporations, labor unions, and other private associations.

[Read: Citizens United v. Federal Elections Commission]

Such was the case with Interior Voters. It was a group formed by the late Scott Hawkins, founder of the now-disbanded Accountability Project, which Hawkins set up as a pro-economy grassroots activist group after the 2010 Citizens United Ruling.

Interior Voters was registered with the Federal Elections Commission for campaign work for less than a month’s worth of effort leading up to the November, 2016 election; the effort included printed postcards, online digital media, radio and cable television ads, and door-to-door, get-out-the-vote work.

Hawkins died in August of 2019. The chair of the Interior Voters for John Coghill, Kathleen “Mike” Dalton of Fairbanks, died in February. Because both were in failing health in the last year of their lives, no legal defense was mounted on behalf of Interior Voters.

But back in 2016, Hawkins and Dalton had raised funds and sent mailers out in support of their favorite candidate, Republican Sen. John Coghill, and they opposed Democrat Luke Hopkins, the former mayor of Fairbanks. Coghill ended up winning that race.

With The Accountability Project on the rise in Alaska, backing and winning races, the Equal Citizens group took note, and filed a lawsuit.

The other group named in the lawsuit, Working Families of Alaska, was formed in 2011 by Local 341 of the Labor Union. It had worked on behalf of Democrats for many years, having been formed right after the Citizens United ruling came down from the U.S. Supreme Court.

It wasn’t until conservatives in Alaska started making strides with these independent expenditures that it became a problem for the liberal Equal Citizens group, which had ignored the union expenditures for years.

Equal Citizens with its strong Democrat Party and Washington D.C. connections filed on behalf of three Democrats. The litigants hope to take the case all the way to the U.S. Supreme Court to begin to erode some of the provisions of Citizens United. The Accountability Project made an easy target in a cheap state in which to litigate.

The judge’s ruling orders the Alaska Public Offices Commission to institute a $500 limit per person to a political action committee or independent expenditure group, to align with Alaska’s extremely limiting campaign laws that allow no more than $500 per person given to a candidate during a calendar year. In 2006, voters supported the measure with 73 percent of the vote.

That 2006 law against larger campaign contributions has not been applied to the independent groups — until this judge’s order.

Because the Alaska Public Offices Commission is named as a defendant, the State Department of Law asked for a rehearing of the matter on Monday.

[Read original MRAK story from 2018: Outside group complains about Alaska super-PACs]

The case has the likelihood to go back to the U.S. Supreme Court, which had already ruled that free speech rights extend to these independent groups. But Equal Citizens is looking for another bite of the apple, through the liberal and cheap-to-litigate Alaska Court System.

A deeper dive into the recall signatures: Juneau tops list

13

THE MOOD IN THE SEAT OF GOVERNMENT IS FOR A NEW GOVERNOR

The district that had the most people signing the Recall Dunleavy application petition was downtown Juneau, with 3,012 people signing in House District 33. That was followed by University of Alaska stronghold Fairbanks District 4, where 2,709 people signed the petition.

Third highest in signatures was Anchorage south hillside House District 28, with 2,183 putting their name on the list. That district is represented by Rep. Jennifer Johnston, and is dense with University of Alaska professors and employees in the medical field.

But although some districts are nearly as blue as Downtown Juneau, they are not dense, and not as easy to collect signatures in. For example, Rep. Tiffany Zulkosky represents the blue District 38, whose hub community is Bethel. It’s a far-flung region, and signature gatherers just focused on the town.

In the downtown Juneau area, signature gathering was a cakewalk, centering in the beehive neighborhoods around the capital, where last year voters went heavily for Mark Begich for governor, with Precinct 2 voters favoring him with 597 votes to the 111 votes given to Michael Dunleavy.

It’s normal for Juneau: In 2012, the capital city led the state in percentages of those voting for Barack Obama for president. And in 2016, not a single precinct in the capital city had Donald Trump in the lead, and in downtown Juneau only 15 percent of the voters picked Trump.

[Read: Media moguls in Alaska sign recall petition]

Here’s the snapshot of all the House districts from across the state, with how many of their voters signed the recall petition. Under this snapshot is a downloadable spreadsheet with the same information: